RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Rove Indicted–Frog March the Bastard

by
Larry C Johnson

As Freddy Mercury sang, "Another One Bites the Dust".

Jason Leopold beats the Main Stream Media Stenographers again.  Check his story out.

Will we see the following real world?

Rove_in_cuffs

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post29 Comments »

Comment by Patrick Henry | 2006-05-14 00:29:09

Frog went a COURTIN…He Did Go..

CROAK…..

 

Comment by taters | 2006-05-14 01:20:56

Amen, Larry! This is getting closer & closer to Cheney.

 

Comment by Hope | 2006-05-14 01:36:53

I’m so sick of these criminals in the White House! God I hope Jason Leopold is correct!

 

Comment by colorado bob | 2006-05-14 02:01:59

Speaking of more criminal bullshit:
Fired Officer Believed CIA Lied to Congress
Friends Say McCarthy Learned of Denials About Detainees’ Treatment

By R. Jeffrey Smith
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, May 14, 2006; Page A01

A senior CIA official, meeting with Senate staff in a secure room of the Capitol last June, promised repeatedly that the agency did not violate or seek to violate an international treaty that bars cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment of detainees, during interrogations it conducted in the Middle East and elsewhere.

But another CIA officer — the agency’s deputy inspector general, who for the previous year had been probing allegations of criminal mistreatment by the CIA and its contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan — was startled to hear what she considered an outright falsehood, according to people familiar with her account. It came during the discussion of legislation that would constrain the CIA’s interrogations.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/13/AR2006051301311.html

 

Comment by Adm Happy Horatio Hornhonker | 2006-05-14 03:10:17

From an AP Peport at USA Today:

Cheney the focus of CIA leak court filing

Updated 5/13/2006 11:51 PM ET

WASHINGTON (AP) — In a new court filing, the prosecutor in the CIA leak case revealed that Vice President Dick Cheney made handwritten references to CIA officer Valerie Plame — albeit not by name — before her identity was publicly exposed.

The new court filing is the second in little more than a month by Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald mentioning Cheney as being closely focused with his then-chief of staff, I. Lewis Libby, on Bush administration critic Joseph Wilson, who is married to Plame.

With the two court filings, Fitzgerald has pointed to an important role for the vice president in the weeks leading up to the leaking of Plame’s identity.

In the latest court filing late Friday, Fitzgerald said he intends to introduce at Libby’s trial in January a copy of Wilson’s op-ed article in The New York Times “bearing handwritten notations by the vice president.” The article was published on July 6, 2003, eight days before Plame’s identity was exposed by conservative columnist Bob Novak.

The notations “support the proposition that publication of the Wilson Op Ed acutely focused the attention of the vice president and the defendant — his chief of staff — on Mr. Wilson, on the assertions made in the article and on responding to those assertions.”

The article containing Cheney’s notes “reflects the contemporaneous reaction of the vice president to Mr. Wilson’s Op Ed article,” the prosecutor said. “This is relevant to establishing some of the facts that were viewed as important by the defendant’s immediate superior, including whether Mr. Wilson’s wife had ’sent him on a junket,’ the filing states.

The reference is to the fact that the CIA sent Wilson on a trip to Africa in 2002 to check out a report that Iraq had made attempts to acquire uranium yellowcake from Niger.

Wilson concluded that it was highly doubtful an agreement to purchase uranium had been made.

More at: USA Today | Saturday May 13, 2006 | Cheney the focus of CIA leak court filing

 

Comment by Adm Happy Horatio Hornhonker | 2006-05-14 03:12:57

And ….

If your interested in viewing the copy of the notations that Big Dick actually made on his copy of Joe Wilson’s Op-Ed there is a copy of it over at Talking Points Memo…

Here’s the link: http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/docs/cheney-notes/

 

Comment by Jason | 2006-05-14 04:53:39

Larry– someone posted to DU under your name that Joe Wilson had heard about Rove getting indicted and that Leopold has multiple sources. Was that really you or someone abusing your credibility?

Right now, noone but Leopold has run with the story. Have you heard anything from a source not derived from the Truthout article?

 

Comment by Dan | 2006-05-14 09:05:44

I have been wondering why many in the blogosphere have been reluctant to run with Jason Leopold’s “scoops” on the Plamegate scandal. I also noticed that Rawstory.com has stopped linking to him. I finally looked him up on Wikipedia where they briefly described a plagiarism controversy over an article of his on Salon.com in 2002. Below is a link to both sides of the story:

http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0210/S00084.htm

I hope he’s not wrong this time and that it truly is Fitzmas!

Keep up the great blogging, Larry…

 

Comment by SusanUnPC | 2006-05-14 10:27:01

Dan, that’s a heck of an account in Salon. I’m blown away.

Then again, I’ve felt occasional mistrust of Truthout since about 2000. In those days, Truthout produced no original content — it just reproduced others’ articles. And it was constantly begging its e-mail subscribers for contributions.

Back then, I was active in a marine mammal protection mailing list. One day, everyone on the list was atwitter about a great story on whales that was published at Truthout. Truthout’s whale story was accompanied by a plea for contributions to keep Truthout afloat. I went Truthout’s original link. Since there was no attribution, I had to assume Truthout had written the piece. Suspcious, however, I pulled some key phrases, and searched for them … my search took me to a Greenpeace article published the same day Truthout published it.

Truthout had published Greenpeace’s article verbatim, and without a link to Greenpeace.

What made me particularly angry was that Greenpeace wrote and sent out this article as its OWN fundraiser, yet Truthout had appropriated it for its own fundraising. I contacted Greenpeace. I don’t know what transpired after that, but Truthout removed the piece a day or so later.

P.S. I think that, if blog writers link to a Truthout article written, say, by Newsweek, it’s important to also mention, and link, the original article at Newsweek. Credit should go where it’s due.

 

Comment by SusanUnPC | 2006-05-14 10:31:11

Btw: This was a long time ago. It was around 2000. Perhaps the operation has become more professional in the time being.

 

Comment by fightingdem | 2006-05-14 11:50:15

Actually, the song that sprang to mind was K.C. and the Sunshine Band’s “That’s The Way I Like It.”

Uh-huh, uh-huh!

 

Comment by J | 2006-05-14 12:00:27

Larry,

it sure looks like the rove indictment will be made public monday morning. notice how ‘convenient’ that bush’s immigration speech is monday night — to draw attention away from rove’s indictment. the bush’s are infamous for changing the subject when they’re boxed into a corner.

notice when the bush white house came out with their announcement that bush would address the nation — after ag gonzales had heard the indictment, and then rushed back to the white house to brief bush & crew.

 

Comment by blog101 | 2006-05-14 13:13:03

That is rather a humiliating photograph of Rove. It would be fun to see Cheney in a similar pose.

blog101.org: http://www.blog101.org
myblogclub.org: http://www.myblogclub.org

 

Comment by wink | 2006-05-14 13:27:39

libby, rove, then cheney.

Cheney is the target and always has been.

Cheney knew Val was Noc.

 

Comment by Leslie | 2006-05-14 14:09:27

I so hope Jason Leopold is correct and Rove is frogmarched out of the White House Monday. Next up: Cheney’s frogmarch.

 

Comment by Gypsy | 2006-05-14 14:56:35

Let the Frog March begin and may Cheney be Rove’s dance partner.

 

Comment by calvinthecat | 2006-05-14 15:45:52

Mr. J., you too, too much. Queen, indeed.

 

Comment by waiting in texas | 2006-05-14 17:55:53

“Frog March the Bastard”

Hey Larry, tell us how you REALLY feel!!! Love that title. Have my fingers crossed that Jason Leopold is spot on in his story.

 

Comment by mboy | 2006-05-14 19:10:20

if leopold is accurate, then let the marching begin.

 

Comment by Agent99 | 2006-05-15 00:50:57

I think Leopold is just too tempting a target…. And, I do not like Truthout because they edit out embarrassing stuff so you can’t refer back to it, and they add in stuff to make it look as if that was how the piece was to begin with. It drives me nuts. For a place called “Truthout” they’re not very honest. Harumph.

 

Comment by thepoetryman | 2006-05-15 10:48:50

The roof of heaven’s whole
Dropped down yesterday
As if a planned demolition;
Story by story she came tumbling,
Slip-knotting tongue, Lie-splattering lips!
The entire luminary came with,
As if a God-bomb had been leveled,
As if upon a house of sticks,
Clipping-truth, distorting-whisper, censoring turncoat!

(No more security clearance.
No more blossoming smirks
No more spin of your collusion.
No more freedom, autonomy, liberty!
The irony’s palpable!)

The world felt the sky’s fist plunge
Willfully into America’s wanton throat;
Strip-mining souls of human-monstrosity,
And wickedness whispered no more!

(Be done with it!
You traitorous bastard
Of the progeny of Satan!
You’ve now your just deserts!)

The sky lunged forth into misery
And extracted her source.
The trees bowed down, limbs, like colossal headstones,
Wedged into the red ground
Making a gruesome sound
That echoed across the world.
Suddenly, out of the chaos, rose the children’s voices,

“Freedom’s come at last!”

 

Comment by wink | 2006-05-15 13:27:11

“I so hope Jason Leopold is correct and Rove is frogmarched out of the White House Monday.”

Wednesday or Friday.

 

Comment by Neil' | 2006-05-15 19:22:27

I’ve heard the Wednesday or Friday meme on the crustier in-the-know sites too. But there’s supposed to be a chance that Rove will bargain out of it anyway, no?

 

Comment by Seixon | 2006-05-19 15:36:28

Let me guess, Rove struck a deal… after he had already been indicted… in an unprecedented move by Fitzgerald…

Time to start spilling the beans Mr. Johnson.

 

Comment by Espella Humanzee | 2006-05-21 16:52:56

I want to know if you neo-left bastards are going to apologize for fabricating this entire indictment fiasco - not only to your gullible readerships, but to Karl Rove as well. As the subject of Leopold & Madsen’s lies he’s due an apology, if you all had any class at all.

What a bunch of incompetents. The world is laughing at you.

 

Comment by Doug Keenan | 2006-05-21 23:01:58

Why drag Joe Wilson’s good name into this?

 

Comment by Thinker | 2006-05-22 00:04:18

Well I’m not laughing Espella Humanzee, well accept at the term “neo-leftist”. What the hell’s that?

At present Rove is in the centre of a hell of a mess. And that is neither left nor right.

Your comment about the World laughing, well it’s on the right track. But I shall put it more accutely. The World, at present, is grimacing at the United States. Some find different people or cirmumstances to criticise. So, if you are looking for credibility here Espella Humanzee, you need to get with the pace. I am not suggesting everyone’s a Bush basher (though I suspect most are, right now), but no-one’s happy. And that means something’s gotta give!

 

Comment by Espella Humanzee | 2006-06-06 11:44:28

Ah, I just caught your snarky remark about “neo-leftists” via a Google search. Excuse me for not visiting more often. I don’t keep up with your daily insanity.

I believe the term “neo-leftists” DOES apply in the sense that the Democratic party has been overrun by liberal fundamentalism. What the Democratic party use to stand for has been replaced by unhinged paranoids bent destroying America and her core values.

As for credibility, I’m not the one who swore Rove was getting indicted. You and your TruthOut buddies have your own credibility issues. But that was a fun weekend watching you all backtrack and post date your claims.

So frog march this, buddy.

“All of this matters because it suggests that Mr. Fitzgerald is scrambling even now to explain why a seasoned attorney such as Mr. Libby would lie to a grand jury. The prosecutor’s original indictment doesn’t mention a motive. And his mention of our editorial suggests he’s now trying to invent a motive out of Mr. Libby’s attempt to defend the White House from Mr. Wilson’s manifestly false allegations at the onset of a Presidential election campaign. (Mr. Wilson joined the Kerry campaign until he was dropped after the official probes destroyed his credibility.)

The more of Mr. Fitzgerald’s case that becomes public, the more it looks like he has made the terrible mistake for a prosecutor of taking Joe Wilson’s side in what was essentially a political fight.” - WSJ Editorial

http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110008476

 

Comment by Mr.Murder | 2006-06-06 20:46:55

Opinion’s all you got. Fitz is dealing with the facts. The law technically doesn’t apply to rove as he had no clearance at the time he helped out Plame.

It applies in whole regarding intent with his “fair game” comment.

 

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
noq-adbutton1.gif