<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nuke transportation story has explosive implications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-35182</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 16:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-35182</guid>
		<description>Denny, 
-Finally someone said something.  Those people just happened to tragically die (most before this incident even happened).  I guess the next time I read the Air Force Times and see the pages of deaths for active duty airman I should just assume they were all stationed at Minot or Barksdale and that Chaney used his hidden missle to kill them all in traffic accidents.  Geeze people, listen to your selves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Denny,<br />
-Finally someone said something.  Those people just happened to tragically die (most before this incident even happened).  I guess the next time I read the Air Force Times and see the pages of deaths for active duty airman I should just assume they were all stationed at Minot or Barksdale and that Chaney used his hidden missle to kill them all in traffic accidents.  Geeze people, listen to your selves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred C. Dobbs</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-32725</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred C. Dobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 13:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-32725</guid>
		<description>Given the nature of the clowns we now pay taxes to pull the levers of our government, and the fact that some extragovernmental players appear to have successfully employed techniques like non - judicial homicide (JFK and Wellstone come to mind) to advance their agendas without regard to the will of the people, be advised that the truth is always worse than we can imagine, in our wildest, most paranoid dreams.

That said, Occam's Razor applies, even as the data accumulate.

Thousands devote time and energy pointlessly speculating about what REALLY happened to the RMS TITANIC, the HINDENBURG, TWA Flight 800, Judge Crater, the Lindberg Baby, etc.

Almost no one expends any energy trying to find out what the LUSITANIA was really carrying, an issue which might be of some interest to hundreds of thousands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the nature of the clowns we now pay taxes to pull the levers of our government, and the fact that some extragovernmental players appear to have successfully employed techniques like non - judicial homicide (JFK and Wellstone come to mind) to advance their agendas without regard to the will of the people, be advised that the truth is always worse than we can imagine, in our wildest, most paranoid dreams.</p>
<p>That said, Occam&#8217;s Razor applies, even as the data accumulate.</p>
<p>Thousands devote time and energy pointlessly speculating about what REALLY happened to the RMS TITANIC, the HINDENBURG, TWA Flight 800, Judge Crater, the Lindberg Baby, etc.</p>
<p>Almost no one expends any energy trying to find out what the LUSITANIA was really carrying, an issue which might be of some interest to hundreds of thousands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Competing against our own? : NO QUARTER</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-32696</link>
		<dc:creator>Competing against our own? : NO QUARTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 05:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-32696</guid>
		<description>[...] Read Rob&#8217;s October 8 op-ed, re-posted here: &#8220;Nuke transportation story has explosive implications.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read Rob&#8217;s October 8 op-ed, re-posted here: &#8220;Nuke transportation story has explosive implications.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FightTheFuture</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-32103</link>
		<dc:creator>FightTheFuture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-32103</guid>
		<description>So when the bright flash blisters your face to the bone and blows your ass away, how will that double-wide look to you then?  Will you build it up, or just swallow the dreamy delusions for sanity and roll it into reality world?

Some things are better off assuming the worst.  Given Bu$hitCo + Nuclear Warheads and very disturbing stories from whistleblowers about them, I will assume the worse!!  I can always say sorry later, but to call it tinfoil is the real disservice here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So when the bright flash blisters your face to the bone and blows your ass away, how will that double-wide look to you then?  Will you build it up, or just swallow the dreamy delusions for sanity and roll it into reality world?</p>
<p>Some things are better off assuming the worst.  Given Bu$hitCo + Nuclear Warheads and very disturbing stories from whistleblowers about them, I will assume the worse!!  I can always say sorry later, but to call it tinfoil is the real disservice here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FightTheFuture</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-32102</link>
		<dc:creator>FightTheFuture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-32102</guid>
		<description>Oh wow!!!   Well, that makes it &lt;em&gt;all &lt;/em&gt;better!  &lt;strong&gt;NOT!!&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh wow!!!   Well, that makes it <em>all </em>better!  <strong>NOT!!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: serena1313</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-32009</link>
		<dc:creator>serena1313</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 06:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-32009</guid>
		<description>Fred Thanks. 

I've read WMR at times, but I cannot verify the veracity of his reports either. However a lot of the same information has been published elsewhere in various media sources. 

WMR seems to be pretty much on the up-and-up. I do not recall reading any news sources that refuted the information in his stories. On the otherhand, if I remember correctly, not all of the information he supplies can be readily verified either. 

Insofar as the Minot A/F Base deaths: only 2 of the six died prior to 30 August 2007, both on the 20 July 2007. And Barksdale A/F Base, I believe Larry mentioned, is the jumping off base for planes headed for the Middle-East. 

Announcenments of their deaths:
http://www.kfyrtv.com/News_Stories.asp?news=10465
http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070915/BREAKINGNEWS/70915012
http://www.kxmc.com/News/161562.asp
http://www.kxmc.com/getArticle.asp?ArticleId=140988
http://www.bismarcktribune.com/articles/2007/07/20/news/state/136489.txt
http://www.komotv.com/news/local/9679367.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I think Bush's father has more common sense in his little finger than his son:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"By Michael E. Salla, M.A., Ph.D.

"The discovery of the nuclear armed B-52 was, according to Hans Kristensen, a nuclear weapons expert at the Federation of American Scientists, the first time in 40 years that a nuclear armed plane had been allowed to fly in the U.S. LINK. Since 1968, after a SAC bomber crashed in Greenland, all nuclear armed aircraft have been grounded but were kept on a constant state of alert. After the end of the Cold War, President &lt;strong&gt;George H.W. Bush&lt;/strong&gt; ordered in &lt;strong&gt;1991&lt;/strong&gt; that nuclear weapons were to be removed from all aircraft and stored in nearby facilities. ..."
 http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18374.htm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"09/13/07 "The Canadian" --- - Critically exploring whether or not there was a covert attempt to instigate a catastrophic nuclear war against Iran is illuminated through an introduction using the recent B-52 Incident. On August 30, a B-52 bomber armed with five nuclear-tipped Advanced Cruise missiles travelled from Minot Air Force base, North Dakota, to Barksdale Air Force base, Louisiana, in the United States. Each missile had an adjustable yield between five and 150 kilotons of TNT which is at the lower end of the destructive capacities of U.S. nuclear weapons. For example, the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima had a yield of 13 kilotons, while the Bravo Hydrogen bomb test of 1954 had a yield of 15,000 kilotons. The B-52 story was first covered in the Army Times on 5 September after the nuclear armed aircraft was discovered by Airmen."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
YOU TUBE:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7i06cWfmnrw
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Anyhow this story has gotten, at best, little attention in the US press. 

I find it alarming Bush was that close to dropping &lt;strong&gt;nuclear&lt;/strong&gt; weapons on Iran. Did anyone in Congress know? 

I wonder ... had Bush &#38; Cheney not been stopped if Congress would have started impeachment hearings? What is it going to take!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred Thanks. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read WMR at times, but I cannot verify the veracity of his reports either. However a lot of the same information has been published elsewhere in various media sources. </p>
<p>WMR seems to be pretty much on the up-and-up. I do not recall reading any news sources that refuted the information in his stories. On the otherhand, if I remember correctly, not all of the information he supplies can be readily verified either. </p>
<p>Insofar as the Minot A/F Base deaths: only 2 of the six died prior to 30 August 2007, both on the 20 July 2007. And Barksdale A/F Base, I believe Larry mentioned, is the jumping off base for planes headed for the Middle-East. </p>
<p>Announcenments of their deaths:<br />
<a href="http://www.kfyrtv.com/News_Stories.asp?news=10465" rel="nofollow">http://www.kfyrtv.com/News_Stories.asp?news=10465</a><br />
<a href="http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070915/BREAKINGNEWS/70915012" rel="nofollow">http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070915/BREAKINGNEWS/70915012</a><br />
<a href="http://www.kxmc.com/News/161562.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.kxmc.com/News/161562.asp</a><br />
<a href="http://www.kxmc.com/getArticle.asp?ArticleId=140988" rel="nofollow">http://www.kxmc.com/getArticle.asp?ArticleId=140988</a><br />
<a href="http://www.bismarcktribune.com/articles/2007/07/20/news/state/136489.txt" rel="nofollow">http://www.bismarcktribune.com/articles/2007/07/20/news/state/136489.txt</a><br />
<a href="http://www.komotv.com/news/local/9679367.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.komotv.com/news/local/9679367.html</a><br />
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br />
I think Bush&#8217;s father has more common sense in his little finger than his son:<br />
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~</p>
<p>&#8220;By Michael E. Salla, M.A., Ph.D.</p>
<p>&#8220;The discovery of the nuclear armed B-52 was, according to Hans Kristensen, a nuclear weapons expert at the Federation of American Scientists, the first time in 40 years that a nuclear armed plane had been allowed to fly in the U.S. LINK. Since 1968, after a SAC bomber crashed in Greenland, all nuclear armed aircraft have been grounded but were kept on a constant state of alert. After the end of the Cold War, President <strong>George H.W. Bush</strong> ordered in <strong>1991</strong> that nuclear weapons were to be removed from all aircraft and stored in nearby facilities. &#8230;&#8221;<br />
 <a href="http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18374.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18374.htm</a><br />
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~</p>
<p>&#8220;09/13/07 &#8220;The Canadian&#8221; &#8212; - Critically exploring whether or not there was a covert attempt to instigate a catastrophic nuclear war against Iran is illuminated through an introduction using the recent B-52 Incident. On August 30, a B-52 bomber armed with five nuclear-tipped Advanced Cruise missiles travelled from Minot Air Force base, North Dakota, to Barksdale Air Force base, Louisiana, in the United States. Each missile had an adjustable yield between five and 150 kilotons of TNT which is at the lower end of the destructive capacities of U.S. nuclear weapons. For example, the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima had a yield of 13 kilotons, while the Bravo Hydrogen bomb test of 1954 had a yield of 15,000 kilotons. The B-52 story was first covered in the Army Times on 5 September after the nuclear armed aircraft was discovered by Airmen.&#8221;<br />
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br />
YOU TUBE:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7i06cWfmnrw" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7i06cWfmnrw</a><br />
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~</p>
<p>Anyhow this story has gotten, at best, little attention in the US press. </p>
<p>I find it alarming Bush was that close to dropping <strong>nuclear</strong> weapons on Iran. Did anyone in Congress know? </p>
<p>I wonder &#8230; had Bush &amp; Cheney not been stopped if Congress would have started impeachment hearings? What is it going to take!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred C. Dobbs</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-31872</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred C. Dobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-31872</guid>
		<description>"The B-52H bomber can carry up to six AGM-129A missiles on each of two external pylons for a total of 12 per aircraft. The AGM-129A provides the bomber the ability to attack multiple targets without penetrating an air defense system."

See the pic of just exactly this at: 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-129_ACM

also:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:2006_0306_b52_2lg.jpg

From Wikipedia: "AGM-86B missiles can be air-launched in large numbers by the bomber force. B-52H bombers carry six AGM-86B or AGM-86C missiles on each of two externally mounted pylons &lt;strong&gt;and eight internally on a rotary launcher,&lt;/strong&gt; giving the B-52H a maximum capacity of 20 missiles per aircraft."

The missiles in question Minot-Barksdale were ACM-129A's, per numerous reports.

Not the same missile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The B-52H bomber can carry up to six AGM-129A missiles on each of two external pylons for a total of 12 per aircraft. The AGM-129A provides the bomber the ability to attack multiple targets without penetrating an air defense system.&#8221;</p>
<p>See the pic of just exactly this at: </p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-129_ACM" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-129_ACM</a></p>
<p>also:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:2006_0306_b52_2lg.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:2006_0306_b52_2lg.jpg</a></p>
<p>From Wikipedia: &#8220;AGM-86B missiles can be air-launched in large numbers by the bomber force. B-52H bombers carry six AGM-86B or AGM-86C missiles on each of two externally mounted pylons <strong>and eight internally on a rotary launcher,</strong> giving the B-52H a maximum capacity of 20 missiles per aircraft.&#8221;</p>
<p>The missiles in question Minot-Barksdale were ACM-129A&#8217;s, per numerous reports.</p>
<p>Not the same missile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred C. Dobbs</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-31860</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred C. Dobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-31860</guid>
		<description>"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." - &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Carl Sagan&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.&#8221; - <strong><em>Carl Sagan</em></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred C. Dobbs</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-31857</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred C. Dobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 18:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-31857</guid>
		<description>Here is Rob's blog URL: 

http://robinstorm.blogspot.com/

Pretty informative for those of us who have labored on salt water. If I was still doing that work, AND had a fast connection via INMARSAT, I'd have his stuff on the Master's screen before breakfast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is Rob&#8217;s blog URL: </p>
<p><a href="http://robinstorm.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://robinstorm.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>Pretty informative for those of us who have labored on salt water. If I was still doing that work, AND had a fast connection via INMARSAT, I&#8217;d have his stuff on the Master&#8217;s screen before breakfast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAN</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-31853</link>
		<dc:creator>DAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 18:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-31853</guid>
		<description>I am sorry folks but CyberCOM went active about the time of this story.  All of the stories on this subject have false statements - The Advanced Missiles can not be flown on wing mounts they use a rotary internal system.  So the story is a fictional Psyops test.
For Cyber Command.

Totally reminds me of a false flag operational test - Able Danger...

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sorry folks but CyberCOM went active about the time of this story.  All of the stories on this subject have false statements - The Advanced Missiles can not be flown on wing mounts they use a rotary internal system.  So the story is a fictional Psyops test.<br />
For Cyber Command.</p>
<p>Totally reminds me of a false flag operational test - Able Danger&#8230;</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
