RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Four Reasons, By a Father I’ve Come to Know

This diary is by MarkJay, a wonderful, intelligent man I’ve come to know recently. His story was originally posted at MyDD.com (a great participatory blog about all the candidates) and DailyKos.

Hillary supporters are sometimes criticized for focusing too much on the polls or the horserace, and not enough on why they support their candidate.  Well, below are four heartfelt reasons I support Hillary.

1. Our first son
Our first son was born in 2002, after several years of infertility.  It was the happiest time of our life.  But everything came crashing down in August 2003 when, at the age of 10 months, he died in my car in circumstances I can’t even bear to recount.  I swore to myself that I would do whatever I could to prevent other families from facing this kind of tragedy.

I got involved in a group called Kids and Cars, which works to prevent children dying from non-traffic automobile incidents, such as kids being backed over by vehicles, trapped in power windows, or inadvertently left in cars.  Hundreds of children a year die from these incidents, and most of them could be prevented by simple, inexpensive safety technologies. However, like many safety devices used today, such as seat belts or air bags, the car manufacturers are resisting them.  And the National Transportation Safety Association (NTSA) doesn’t even monitor these types of non-traffic incidents, let alone work to prevent them.  Kids and Cars has been working for years to get national legislation past mandating that the NTSA monitor these incidents and investigate safety devices that could prevent them.

It’s been tough going, but there has been one Senator (out of 100) who has sponsored this legislation year after year, and worked tirelessly with her staff to try to get it through.  Yes, that’s Hillary Clinton.

We came close last year, and we are in excellent position this year.  There are now 36 co-sponsors (including 7 Republicans, and including presidential candidates Chris Dodd, Barack Obama, and John McCain, for the Senate Bill Hillary has sponsored, S. 694, the Cameron Gulbransen Kids and Cars Safety Act of 2007, and its companion bill, H.R. 1216 is also making progress.  (The Consumers Union has set up a site where you can easily send a message to your House and Senate members asking them to support this legislation.)


So, in memory of our first son, I am proud to support the Senate who quietly and without fanfare has worked so that other children like him will not needlessly die.

2. Our second son

Our second son was born less than a year after our first son died.  Our joy turned to concern when we learned he had a congenital heart defect and down syndrome.  After heart surgery at three months of age and a number of other medical emergencies his first year of life, he became a healthy, happy, loving little boy.  Though he was later diagnosed with autism as well, he is highly sociable, interactive, loving, and intelligent.  We just need to find the right ways to reach him, to communicate with him, and to help him learn.

Hillary Clinton has been fighting for the rights of children for special needs for decades.  In her first job out of law school working for the Children’s Defense Fund, she conducted research that led to Congress passing the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, the landmark bill mandating that all children with disabilities be educated in the public school system. later, she helped improve the education of children with special needs by working to reauthorize the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act.  In 2005, she sponsored an amendment to increase funding for the act by $4 billion dollars.  She also cosponsored the Personal Excellence for Children with Disabilities Act, a bill that promised to help schools recruit and retain new special education teachers, and better prepare general education teachers and staff to work with children with special needs.

Most recently, she has called for greatly expanded funding to the National Institute for Health to investigate treatments for children with disabilities.  And she has put forth a comprehensive and detailed plan to help children and families affected by autism, with numerous elements that correspond very closely to what families in the autism community have been demanding for years.

So, in honor of my second son, and that he might have rights to the most appropriate education so as to help him meet his full potential, I am proud to support the presidential candidate who has worked tirelessly toward that end for decades.

3. Our daughter

Our daughter was born in 2006.  Precocious, highly communicative, and with a great personality, she has the entire world before her.  At least I hope so.  Like any parent, I would give anything to ensure that my daughter has every opportunity in the world, and never has to feel that certain avenues are closed off to her.

But I am also cognizant of the fact that there are many glass ceilings that prevent women from reaching their full potential in our society.  For more than half our nation’s history, women could not vote.  And, even today, women make up only 11% of the Supreme Court members and 16% of the Senate.  And there has never, in the 231-year history of our country, been a woman president.
I would never support a candidate for president simply because she were a woman, but I am filled with pride and pleasure to know that the best candidate in the race this year is a woman.  In honor of our daughter, I am pleased to support the candidate that will become the first female president of the U.S. and thus the ultimate shatterer of glass ceilings.

4. Our youngest son

Our youngest son was born in 2006, a twin of our daughter described above. He loves to read, knows three languages, and makes me laugh every day.  As he is the youngest of our children (albeit by a few minutes), I think often of his future.  What kind of world will he live in?  Will he be able to fulfill his dreams?
And when I think of these things, I think of the Bill Clinton administration, and the eight years of peace and prosperity we had.  For the first time in my life, there was a president that understood the transition from an industrial to a post-industrial world, and could carry out the responsible domestic and international policies to thrive in that world.  The U.S. was respected throughout the world, and we had the strongest economy in our nation’s history, with record gains in economic growth (116 straight months of economic growth at an average rate of 4.0 percent per year), job creation (22.5 million new jobs), income (median family income up nearly 15%), home ownership, and a historic drop in poverty (down 15%), all while overcoming the budget deficit and putting our country in the black.

Hillary Clinton was highly involved in the Clinton presidency, and she and Bill are the closest of political partners.  She is the only Democratic candidate that I have heard speaking about the kind of fiscal responsibility that Bill Clinton exhibited and that we need once again. So, in honor of my youngest son, and so that he and his generation will not be saddled with trillions of dollars of  debt and will instead have a bright and sound future, I am proud to support the next president of the United States, Hillary Clinton.

There you have it–my top four reasons for supporting Hillary Clinton for President of the United States.  I have other reasons, but these are the most heartfelt.
Thank you for reading and I look forward to your comments.  What are your reasons for supporting your presidential candidate? We have a terrific field this year and I will be honored to support whoever wins the nomination.

– From Four Reasons I Support Hillary, by MarkJay, posted originally at MyDD.com which — by the way — is a “grandfather” site to DailyKos, and offers political analyses on ALL the candidates.

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post14 Comments »

Comment by Taters | 2007-12-25 10:22:39

Powerful testimonial. Thanks Susan.

 

Comment by Charles | 2007-12-25 12:57:16

Somehow I doubt anyone could talk you out of that support, Susan. :-)

There’s an important lesson in there for all politicians. Your supporters aren’t giving you their time and money because you have an impressive resume or because you’re a nice person or because you belong to a particular party. They’re there because you did or they expect you to do something of great personal importance.

Comment by SusanUnPC | 2007-12-25 14:21:51

That’s a fascinating remark, Charles.

Probably most voters are looking at the candidates for what each might or might not do for them personally.

I need to think about that — truly interesting, Charles.

Let’s use me as an example. My rational, ideal side always brings up the Supreme Court first: That we need to protect the Court by nominating a Democrat who can win and who knows how to get a Supreme Court nominee confirmed (which takes a lot of experience with the entire process). My very PERSONAL side always goes here first: Social Security. I am truly terrified that if we elect a Republican because we’ve nominated a Democrat who’lll prove easy to beat, my future income and health care will be shredded by a Republican president who’ll privatize and decimate Social Security reserves.

Just an additional thought: MarkJay, a username, is an academic of some note. This is but one of his “diaries,” as they’re called at MyDD and DailyKos. I should have made it more clear in the post, but if you click on his username in the first sentence, you’ll see all the stories he’s written at MyDD:
http://markjay.mydd.com/
— he’s got all kinds of topics there, including universal health care, and even one on autism.

(I’ve gone blank on his username at DailyKos, or I’d give the link to those diaries.)

 

Comment by Marjorie | 2007-12-25 15:28:14

Charles, That is the lesson of the last nine years, isn’t it? So much wealth spread around to CEOs of large corporations, support for companies such as Blackwater, don’t worry about alternative energy sources as long as people are making $$$ from oil-no matter where it is located, and education? No child left behind if their parents can afford private primary and secondary schools. And perhaps the worst lesson of all—that’s what the government elected through voting machine errors and other machinations are for. People who supported those politicians expect that.
I have different expectations from politicians-perhaps because I have little beyond $20 and my vote to contribute. And despite the last nine years, I still believe in several politicians, and in Hillary Clinton in particular. And if she is not elected? I can’t begin to contemplate that. What we have learned in the last nine years about inept, bungling, dishonest politicians makes me despair for the future of our citizens (except, of course, for those in the upper reaches beyond income tax).

Comment by Marjorie | 2007-12-26 12:16:42

Whoops! I meant the “the last six years” not “nine years”. And I meant it three times.

And Taters observation regarding the one toy tester-I did overlook that. Thank you Taters for including it.

Comment by Marjorie | 2007-12-26 12:31:31

Whoops, again. Seven years. Did I get it correct this time?

 
 
 
 

Comment by Taters | 2007-12-25 15:35:30

Not to mention we now have been reduced to one toy tester by the CPSC, of their 400 employees.(And that is an all time low, since their inception.)

Comment by SusanUnPC | 2007-12-25 18:49:34

GREAT addition to the discussion. And the CPSC is run by a woman who’s not an expert in consumer safety, but a former executive.

I’d love to see some powerful legislation get through that gives the FDA, Agriculture, and CPSC a lot of money to hire and train inspectors. Since we can’t get decent inspections in countries like China, we have to have inspectors at the ports to grab every item — at least one per shipment, ideally — and test them. It’d be very, very expensive.

As Leslie pointed out recently, we have problems with products made here but at least we would be able to swoop down on those companies and every plant, and oversee them.

I keep finding things to worry about, it seems. My cats love any wet cat food with fish in it. But I fear that the fish all comes from those horribly polluted fish farms and waters in China — just because that fish is so much cheaper. I’ve promised myself I’m going to call one of the pet food companies this coming week, and ask them if they’ll reveal to me where the fish come from. In the meantime, I’ve got the cats eating organic canned food that is turkey and chicken only, and thankfully they love it. Their favorite brands: Innova/Evo, Evanger’s, and By Nature Organics, all of which are canned in Illinois — and which I buy by the case from Amazon, at great savings, even with the shipping. And I’ve got the UPS drivers trained to knock, give me time to get to the door, and put the package on my sofa.

Btw, my daughter’s C’mas present to me was a new comforter with a beautiful cover — which I needed badly. It’s so soft and fluffy. The cats, snort, love it. And she made sure it was made in the U.S.A. — Sealy brand. She’s become an expert at finding goods made in the U.S., which can be very tough to find.

Comment by Taters | 2007-12-25 20:23:43

Lol,I’m glad the cats love the comforter too. Kudos to your daughter - it is increasingly tougher to find items made here in the states.

And the CPSC is run by a woman who’s not an expert in consumer safety, but a former executive.

And Nancy Nord flies on junkets paid for by those she’s supposed to regulate. She has turned down money from congress for more personnel and for better enforcement tools.
Years ago when Dan Aykroyd brilliantly portrayed sleazy toymaker Irwin Mainway, I thought it was a funny skit. Who knew it would be so prescient of “the market will take care of it” philosophy of current regulatory standards.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8Bpk5vixuY

Did you see this?

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/23/us/23toys.html?hp

Susan,
Even Scaife funded Joseph Farah’s whacked out World NutNet Daily (A home to such reasoned folk as Coulter,Savage & Corsi, among others)is on the side of the consumer and is expressing a degree of disgust in regards to the influx of lead (and worse)tainted toys via China. And even if it’s xenophobic, it has done some investigation on the matter. Not to mention even a drunken blind hog can occasionally stumble up on an acorn.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59309

And from what I understand,lead ingested by infants and toddlers can lead to an IQ. An example was given as 40-50 points on a SAT.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/business/july-dec07/toys_12-20.html

 
 

Comment by PrchrLady | 2007-12-25 22:24:20

Great thread, got in a laugh or two on Susan’s cats! How many do you have? I currently have two, and have fostered them for rescue over the years… also have two chihuahuas, best watch dogs I have ever had… don’t act crazy around my babies when they are guarding me in my house. You will end up with a bloody leg or hand… and they HATE the UPS man’s brown truck. I know when he turns onto my street, a city block down…

As for the writer of this diary, I don’t think I would try to talk him/her out of voting for Hilary. I would probably feel very strongly about it too. I also believe that Hilary would do a good job as president if she is elected. I will vote for any Democrat, to keep the Republicans out of the White House.

One of the best books I have read during my lifetime is Hilary’s book, It Takes a Village to Raise a Child. After reading it, you can’t help but look at children differently, and how our society impacts on what kind of people they become. I also am not surpised at HRC’s support for the programs that have direct impact on the well being of the children of our society, and indeed the world.

I think there are several democratic candidates out there who would make good presidents. (I’m not setting the bar too high, am I???). I know we must elect a Democrat, but I don’t want to see the candidates, or their supporters trash other Dem or Independent cand. Why give added ammunition to the media for hype and BS??? I am sorry I live in Michigan, and that my primary vote will not count. So, I am just waiting to see who is chosen…

Just got back in town from family gatherings, and am starting to catch up with the blog entries… Had a great week and holiday, and miss the kids who are around the world tremendously, but talked to all of them and everyone is safe and well. I have been praying and hoping that all of you here would have a joyous and blessed holiday, which ever holiday you celebrate personally at this time of year… I also ask you to continue to remember those men and women who are or have served this Nation in its Military and Foreign services and who are away from their family and friends during this time. and above all, I pray for Peace for our World, and all its peoples… May God’s Richest Blessings be on ALL of you. Marlene

 
 

Comment by Taters | 2007-12-25 20:25:03

Beg your pardon,I meant an IQ deficiency.

 

Comment by justsomeone | 2007-12-25 20:51:54

“For the first time in my life, there was a president that understood the transition from an industrial to a post industrial world and could carry out the responsible domestic and international policies to thrive in that world.” huuummm, I bet this guy doesn’t live anywhere in the rust belt or on a small family farm here or Mexico. NAFTA really hurt alot of people. Bush the 41st concocted it & Clinton couldn’t wait to hatch it. Sorry, no forgiveness from my end. Oh & there’s that pesky little Community Reinvestment Act that paved the way for the subprime meltdown we’re in today & the ME & Balkan adventures. I think of it as the Bush/Clinton/Bush waltz & we need new music. I’ve got more examples but you got my drift.

 

Comment by justsomeone | 2007-12-25 21:37:13

Given all the dissatisfaction with the quality of imports coming into our country why is Dennis Kucinich the only canidate talking about getting out of the WTO? Actually this entire posse of canidates has me baffled.

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2007-12-26 14:25:14

Best wishes justsomeone:

The WTO is part of the “New World Order”(not so new but repackaged) that globalists require. Why is it that Bush never files complaints with them? What will happen when there is “nationalitic blowback” ?

 
 

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
noq-adbutton1.gif