“Obama office adores psychotic Marxist thug”
By NoQuarter on February 12, 2008 at 12:12 AM in Barack Obama, Chicago politics
Think the right will lay off Obama because he’s so unifying? That instead of attacking him, they’ll join hands and dance in a joyful circle of “oneness” with him? Think again. They’re already out there scouring everywhere for any dirt they can get on him, including a major “hit” movie (see below). Right now, numerous ‘winger blogs are crowing over this story: “A Flag Obama Supporters Salute?,” from Captain’s Quarters blog: “Oh, my. Barack Obama may want to call his new Houston office and suggest some decorating ideas. Take a look at the flag flying in the office at the moment: …”
Blogger Ed Morrisey continues:
No, that’s not a Texas state flag with a picture of Obama on it. It’s the flag of the Castro-led Cuba regime, with Che Guevara’s face superimposed on the side. A Fox report from Houston captured this image as it showed Obama supporters celebrating his momentum after Super Tuesday.
Does Obama know his Houston supporters honor a terrorist in his campaign office? I’m sure he doesn’t. However, it would behoove him to ensure that the flag gets taken down and that he renounces any affinity for Che and the Fidel Castro regime. …
Me? I think there’s a knuckle-headed idiot in Obama’s Houston office who doesn’t have the basic common sense not to display such a flag.
Well, now that I think about it, there actually is a lot more to it. It calls into question the level of knowledge and extent of political sophistication — as well as a basic lack of good ol’ common sense — of a lot of Obama followers. And where in the hell was the paid staffer in charge of that office? Didn’t he or she object and demand its removal? Especially before a local Fox News affiliate filmed the office for a news report? My god. How STUPID can you get.
I have 100% certainty that you’d ever find such a clueless enraptured-by-the-left staffer or volunteer in EITHER the Hillary Clinton or former candidate John Edwards campaign offices anywhere in the U.S. Let alone such a flag in any of their offices.
Click here to see how many other ‘winger blogs are all over this, including influential blog Little Green Football’s “A Che Guevara Flag in Obama’s Houston Office.”
Matt Bramanti at Lone Star Times minces no words:
Obama office adores psychotic Marxist thug — Che Guevara, the chief executioner of Fidel Castro’s brutal revolution, was a bank robber, a cold-blooded murderer, an enthusiastic torturer and generally an evil, sociopathic bastard. He’s quite literally the poster boy for everything wrong with socialism. …
News Busters also takes a whack:
Democrat Presidential candidate Barack Obama already has an issue with wearing American Flag lapel pins, and even with putting his hand over his heart when the American National Anthem is playing. It will be interesting to see how he’ll react (if at all) to the flag hanging in one of his new campaign offices in Houston, Texas.
Yep, that’s right — that is the national flag of Cuba hanging on the wall with none other than Che Guevara superimposed on it.
Check out the video here.
Getting a picture here?
The right is going to portray Obama as an unpatriotic (whisper Muslim) leftist who consorts with all types of extremist leftists. (Then they’ll add to that his remarks that he’d be willing to meet with Chavez et al. without any preconditions, and they’ll paint him into a corner he can’t get out of.)
Think what you will about where the ‘winger bloggers are coming from. I ask again: What in the name of god were the paid staffers and volunteers NOT thinking when they allowed that on their Houston office walls? And I guarantee you’d never find such paraphenalia on a Clinton office wall anywhere.
Ed Morrissey at Captain’s Quarters also has some observations about Obama’s 60 Minutes appearance in “Not Ready For Prime Time“:
Not Ready For Prime Time
Barack Obama appeared on 60 Minutes last night, and once again he offered change. Unfortunately, the kind of change offered appeared to be the same he accuses his opponents of offering — waffling on the status of troops in Iraq. After cheerfully misrepresenting John McCain’s “100 years” comment, he then left himself the leeway to make exactly the same kind of decision: …
[...]
And then, risibly, Obama makes the exact point that Bush, McCain, and even Hillary make about Iraq. As a CinC, he would have to have the options for staying open to him if the strategic situation called for an extended deployment. What if that remained true for the next five years? The next ten? What if the need to counter Islamist terror remained for the next 100 years?
Obama has a gift for communication and a heart in the right place. What he lacks is a specific agenda, an ability to make decisions, and a platform other than the vapid redundancy of “change”. He isn’t ready for prime time.
THERE’s more coming, including an anti-Obama film, via the NYT Caucus Blog:
Anti-Obama Film On the Way
By Leslie WayneA conservative group -– Citizens United -– that has produced a film now in distribution attacking Hillary Clinton called “Hillary, the Movie,” has its sights set on a new target: Barack Obama.
The group has budgeted about $1 million to produce a documentary film about Mr. Obama that is set to be distributed this summer. At the moment, Citizens United has its researchers poring over Mr. Obama’s records as a community organizer, state legislator and United States senator in the same way that it scoured Mrs. Clinton’s record with a highly critical eye and a sharply conservative point of view.
“Obama is a completely clean slate,” said David Bossie, president of the group. “We will develop the image that we want the people to see. We’re doing the hard work of the research right now. The American people don’t know much about Obama, except that they like his speaking style.”
If the Obama movie is anything like the one about Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Obama had better prepare himself. “Hillary, the Movie,” and promotional ads for it, present statements from Dick Morris, Ann Coulter, Robert Novak, Jeff Gerth (a former New York Times reporter), Newt Gingrich and others in which she is called everything from a liar, to a European socialist to being more devious than Richard Nixon. …
Gee, do you think the name Tony Rezko might come up?
Susan,
Keep it up and you’ll have every horrid smashmouth on the net coming to NQ and Hillary will be no closer to winning.
I’m so worried.
This site has no character whatsoever, and makes the New York Post look like an edifice of responsible dialogue.
What’s next? “Here’s Joe Wilson proving that Obama is the bat-winged brother of bin Laden himself!” or similar?
I mean, shit, come one: someone has a poster on the wall in a building somewhere and you try to make an issue out of it.
News flash: to people who DIDNT support the Batista dictatorship in Cuba, and to people who DONT support the ongoing strangulation of Cuba in this half-century-old pissing match between the Washington Consensus and people who want control over their own land, Che G. was not simply a “Marxist Thug”.
I mean shit, RED-BAITING? Didn’t that go out with the Cold War?
Not only do you lack any character whatsoever, but your grasping at miserable straws as your precious candidate loses state after state because the voters can sense how vacuous she is.
blah -
Great!
Then we can accept this as your promise to leave forever, right?
Don’t let the door hit you on the ass on your way out!
Sociopaths will not reason, are not open to reason, in fact view the reasonable as weak, attacking even more fiercely.
I think the republicans like to SEE themselves as dirty rotten bastards, underneath it all, they’re really cowardly, but they will not respond to a handshake, they only respond when intimidated, period.
Reason was already tried with the republicans, it failed, and it will fail, again.
But Obama already thinks like a Republican, so I expect he won’t have too much trouble.
Republicans just can’t lose, either McCain or Obama, no wonder they’re so enthusiastic about his candidacy.
Is James Wolcott more worthy of your consideration? Here, he’s not talking about the ‘winger bloggers I quoted, but the “erudite” conservative pundits who get to occupy a lot of air time and ink:
I have to include this one short additional quote from James Wolcott’s piece:
A practical man. Not dreamy-eyed and in a rapture. A man who wants what’s possible, not only what happens in dreams.
See also the latest post in David Seaton’s blog:
http://seaton-newslinks.blogspot.com/
where he links to an interesting article about Obama from The Australian:
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23182456-28737,00.html
An epigraph:
“Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard.” H. L. Mencken
The copy’n'paste queen, SusanUnPC, strikes again. Why have a unique idea of your own when you can copy and paste someone else’s boilerplate in an attempt to convey on yourself some sort of authority?
Oh, wait! Here comes another copy’n'paste of Paul Krugman! That means you should agree with Susan!
blah -
I thought you and your complete lack of insight were leaving?
Don’t let the door hit you on the ass on your way out!
I don’t think winning caucuses agrees with Obama. He’s becoming more psychotic by the day. He wants the super delegates if they support him but doesn’t want the votes to count in Florida and Michigan. I think he has a hard time with Democracy–because he can’t stand competitors. He hates boomer women and gays. I hope if Obama is the flavor of the month for February — by March he is just a sick afterthought.
Great post Susan! I don’t know how you do it, but you are a wonder woman.
The flag is the kind of thing impressionable kids eat up. They wear Che’s pic on shirts all the time. Of course, in Chicago, they also wear shirts about not talking to the police if you witnessed a murder…
Thank you, Mike. Tell you what it is: I am fucking pissed off. Four years ago, I got John Kerry shoved down my throat because he was supposedly “electable” — that’s what the media told the sheep-like Democrats who voted for him in my caucus. Now the sheep think that Obama is some kind of wunderkind, never thinking through first the kind of fight he’d have in a general election (and how many independents would prefer a far more experienced man like McCain), or the paralysis he’d face in the White House if he made it. He’d get so little done, it’s pathetic. God I wish people would wake the fuck up.
Bring it SusanUnPC; just watch the stitches. ok?
The 1 million dollars spent to whack the new guy on the block. They should spend it on veterans care; or as Larry suggested popcorn for the show.
Susan, I agree with your comment about Larry’s starting to morph into a parody of a decent blogger, but your comment about Kerry shows how little you know about Presidential politics. Do you have any idea how hard it is to strike down an incumbent President? Any? Don’t screech about Kerry’s non-electibility when he came within a gnat’s eyelash of taking down Bush. Without electoral fraud Bush would have been sent back to Crawford. Johnson raises valid points about Obama’s candidacy and Obama had damned sight better start addressing them if he wants to turn his potential blowout into a real one. Otherwise, you (and I others desiring change) will be looking at the hind end of the blowout against McCain.
You are not addressing the biggest problem Kerry had. With Iraq going as bad as it was he should not have had a problem winning by a solid margin. He got trashed by the Swiftboat crowd as well as by the media who were willing to jump in with the right wing talking points about him being an effete elitist. (Read not manly enough.) Granted the media was not as hard on him as they were on Clinton and Gore, but they still kept mocking him for a lot of things, repeating right wing spin. They actually talked about how Kerry should have known better than to - gasp - windsurf! His campaign did not respond quickly enough, but the real problem, as Bob Somerby keeps pointing out at dailyhowler.com, was that Democrats passively sat back and let it happen. It is always more effective when others defend a candidate. If he or she has to do this themselve, they look defensive, which always appears weak.
There has been a well organized right wing grass roots attack network that jumps in when their guys get criticised, faily or not, but Democrats seem to sit around waiting for Mommy and Daddy to fix things. And Democratic leaders are reluctant to defend their own, fearing to get dirtied by the fray or offend their buddies in the media. This happened in the 90’s with the Clintons and again with Gore and Kerry. We all bear some of the blame.
The good thing this time around is that people are starting to push back as MSNBC is beginning to learn. I am afraid, though, that Democrats will only do this if they see racism or sexism, not just unfair bias against our candidates. We have to make it clear to the media that there will be as big a price to pay for unfair treatment of Democrats as there has been for being hard on Republicans.
Bernie -
Pour it on!
Thanks for educating me. Perhaps I wasn’t precisely clear. (For the record, I was a Deaniac.) Am aware of the history of presidential politics, but thought there was a better-than-usual shot to bring Bush down.
At my caucuses and on the media, everywhere, endlessly, all I heard was that John Kerry was the “electable” one. (That was after the media had descended on Howard Dean and turned him into the looney he wasn’t, and Kerry/Gephardt had secretly run vicious TV attack ads against him in Iowa.)
That was his one big selling point — I’m electable! Turns out he had a heck of a time impressing average voters (who of course don’t take the time to really study issues, and didn’t know that, for one thing, he’s a wonk on energy and the environment).
Then those debates! Bush was so bad that if he merely made it through, the press praised him. But I couldn’t imagine how people could watch that embarrassingly ignorant, inarticulate boob and ever manage to vote for him.
I did support him — even held a fundraiser for him, and I showed his film about his Vietnam years at the public library. And I repeatedly replaced the Kerry/Edwards signs that Bush goons tore down in my front lawn, and removed the Bush bumper sticker they put over my K/E sticker.
I was plenty pissed off when he just folded and didn’t fight the Ohio illegalities … although I could see that it would take a horribly long time and he’d be crucified for doing it. (He should have unleashed John Edwards and let him lead the fight.)
susanunpc-
It’s painfully coming back to me. I get sick each time I hear Dean artfully quip in realtime. He should have been the candidate.
The DNC sold Dean out because the Ketchup King made it easier to raise cash for the DNC and because Dean hollered! So fucking what - Bush was a cheerleader for God’s sake!
Now numnuts want a corrupt Urkle cause their hip-hop kiddies like him! How cute and how fucking stupid.
Susan, I agree with you completely. And also with Teak-about your health.
Remember when Peter Jennings had someone on his news show who had made a big deal about the “scream” and she admitted what was being shopped around the news was not how an accurate reflection of how it sounded at the noisy gathering? I do miss Peter Jennings.
An observation re: the poster with Che–I looked at it several times–is it Che’s face or Obama’s superimposed over Che’s?
I don’t like seeing that Che Guevara flag at the Obama headquarters. Whatever next — Brown shirts for his young supporters?
Relax s.hall, it could be a whole lot worse.
Nice fellow this Che. Educated (dentist), close to the people, ready to go into the woods to further the revolution, assassinated by the US/CIA which makes him, presto, a good guy!
Yes, it could be MUCH worse: it could have been a krucifix and a pic of the djeezus on that wall!
Now, speak of a blood-drenched arch evil: a legendary and imaginary character whose septic-tank “philosophy” has been responsible for countless millions of victims around the planet over the past twenty centuries, and you can see how every US politician and his/her blabbering submission to kristian superstition is far worse, FAR WORSE, than a pic of Che on a Cuban flag can ever hope to be!!
Yeah the young people ate of the Hitler crap too.
Susan -
There’s a jerky guy who writes for Rolling Stone who dressed up in an ape suit and met John Kerry during that ill-fated campaign. He said Kerry was dull as dirt. Meanwhile Bush’s bus was a regular frat party. So, guess who the press adored?
Now that same group of hacks is partying with Barack Hussein Obama.
If Hillary Rodham Clinton can just get the nomination, she’ll have to be more fun than cranky old McCain…
If the people actually want positive competent change - let’s start Larry’s campaign now!
What the heck is Larry’s middle name? Is he an LBJ? 2012!
In fairness to Che, he wasn’t our guy. Castro was, until Ike flip-flopped and refused to meet him when we took him to the White House.
Well, it may have been the OVP’s office/mansion to be more exact. So basically you could say Castro was on the table of denial plausibility.
Better the evil you know than the evil you don’t know. Che was seen as a wild one, Castro was one who would act in predicted and trained fashion. Pity the tobacco lobby owned so much a stake in our foreign policy dictates of the time.
That’s what made him an enemy. We could of had a democratically chosen leader backed by popular votes from common folk. The power firms and Wall St. types wanted a classic venture capital puppet instead.
Still, putting that banner up in a campaign office is a bit of a reach. Not ready for prime time, though it could be photo shop for all I know….
Mr, Murder besides the power firms and Wall St. types, the mob was mighty sore as well; still are.
I was but knee high to a grass hopper back then so maybe they were all the same back then.
Kids and bands use his iconographic image today. Including the band Rage Against the Machine, which toured Cuba to standing room only crowds and sold American music to Cuba’s young adults.
It’s not a very politically savvy move for traditional or conservative votes though.
I wear a Che shirt at times, a gift from a former business partner. He said I was the revolutionary type, it never sold at his store. Music downloads killed the record store. It was a way of life for him, it was a hobby for me. Getting paid to jam music and read HST as a fringe benefit, then the Bush boom and happened and the store closed.
So much for being all about the music. If it can be that way for a little time in your life, it’s worth its weight in gold, every second of it.
That’s why it’s so much fun to see musical friends share experiences here, brings back some really good times.
When I get really bored, I “think” in music, ie, music as a replacement for the spoken word, even without lyric.
So, I “hear” the emotion in, say, a Marshall Crenshaw guitar solo, a Neko Case sustained vocal note, or Chopin’s Prelude in E minor, and I try to understand what the musician is communicating, non verbally, matching it to other non verbal cues.
It doesnt mean anything, but it’s fun.
Makes boring, pretentious people (criminal politicians being the worst offenders) more tolerable, the little girls DON’T understand, and Dick Cheney can really boogie to Jerry Lee, did you know? .
Speaking of, when I see Obama, lately, I hear Marvin Gaye’s “Trouble Man: moving down the line…, This I know, baby.”
Hey! Isn’t that the SAME flag that all those “Freedom Loving Cuban Peoples” (each and every one a damned good Republican!) who were protesting the return of Elian Gonzales to Cuba?
Just sayin’…
If this isn’t a fake photo, then Obama should fire the idiot. End of story. Even if the right tries to make an issue of this, I doubt it will play well. Just run a few ads with McCain saying, “10,000 year in Iraq” and “bomb, bomb, bomb, Iran”.
You didn’t see Hillary break a sweat or break stride once her numbers started slipping, did you? She axed her campaign manager and moved on.
You need to take a page from her book and steady your nerves. This thing will go on until August and and through a floor fight at the convention.
“psychotic Marxist thug”
Jaysus Feckin’ Christ! He was on half the T-shirts in Ireland last summer (Grandmother from Galway, a Lynch, I believe, one of the original Galway tribes)
This is an obvious right wing nutter whack job. Moreover, it’s obviously from the right wing nutter fringe since the mainstream reactionaries are puffing up Obama and praying to every god they can find that the Democrats will nominate him.
Take a deep breath and contemplate this.
(1) Have you been able to vet the photo? I’ve only found it on right wing blogs and we all know what truth-tellers they are.
(2) No democrat operative on the Gulf Coast flies the Cuban flag or a picture of Che in their office. Christalmighty people, these operatives have life-sized photos of Oboma on the wall, not Castro or Che. Do the math.
Smilin Jim, it not about the truth and more about SY-ops and 1 million dollars buys a lot of that. I just want to see who’d buying tickets for the show.
That would make an interesting man on the street interview video.
Exactly.
It’s like a relative of mine calling me to tell me that Obama’s middle name is Osama.
Doesn’t matter that it’s incorrect. It’s the whisper far and wide on the streets.
It’s like the e-mail a neighbor sent me that he’d received on a big mailing to lots of local people — full of factual errors about Obama and very negative inferences about the church he attends in Chicago (although its exclusive black membership and preference for ties to Africa rather than the U.S. are worrying).
It again doesn’t matter that it’s incorrect.
MILLIONS and MILLIONS of people will get this stuff, or hear the whispers in barber shops or across backyard fences, and they will believe it.
Then combine those items with some factually true items — like his long association with the Chicago crook Tony Resko and Resko’s pals including that crooked multi-millionaire Iraqi businessman — and it’ll get explosive!
The Swiftboating of John Kerry will seem like child’s play next to what they’ll do to Obama.
I have been wondering why Microsoft Office spell checks Obama and wants to replace it with Osama…freaky shit.
Hope is a very easy emotion to “beat” out of someone…despair? much harder.
No sweat, I kaint spell Oboma neither.
Oy vey. That’s just dumb.
I said the same thing when Michelle Obama made her “I’ll have to think about it” remark. Dumb. And unnecessary.
She thinking “Do I get to keep the house?”
“They’re already out there scouring everywhere for any dirt they can get on him…”
And you guys here are providing them with one hell of a source!
I hope, if he does get the nomination, that you people are prepared to deal with the fact that you might just have helped bring about another Republican administration.
Well, Shirin, it actually is more a public service. Every candidate will attract their share of hysterical detractors. If anyone is going to sniff out problems, these people will. However, I do find it fun to debunk their claims or otherwise conclude their “mountains” seem really to be molehills. For example, the wildly crazy arguments that Obama is in bed with that Auchi guy.
My favorite made up fact so far is the assertion that Obama’s people sent Dick fricking Morris to Kenya to stir up that hornet’s nest. Low point was strained arguments that a racist comment was really a statement of cultism. Fun stuff, otherwise.
Well, I have to tell you that this Auchi thing is very strange in a number of ways.
You know, Auchi is a very big, important, and well-known Turkmen clan in Kirkuk, but I never heard of any Chaldean Auchi, and so far I cannot find anyone I know who has either, and yet this guy is supposedly Chaldean?
And he was supposedly such a big, important person to Saddam, and yet most people, some of whom were very well-connected to the regime, have not heard of him at all.
And yet suddenly he financed 9/11, was “Saddam’s right hand man” (a bit of patent nonsense), and Saddam’s primary supplier of weapons (another bit of demonstrable nonsense), and - miracle of miracles! - he is a critical influence in Barak Obama’s life, only no one can present anything but pure speculation by way of substantiation. There is nothing real, and nothing that does not require a huge stretch of credulity to connect Auchi with Barak Obama politically or in any other way.
It all just might be a bit too convenient and well timed, perhaps? I don’t know. I don’t support Obama, I don’t support Hillary (largely for many of the same reasons), and I am getting a bit sick and tired of the “all Obama all the time” zone around here.
Sorry, but Morris did go to Kenya to work on Odinga’s campaign and there is evidence that former Clinton staffers who now work for Obama got him to go. Since Obama has supported Odinga, this is not a big stretch.
Jacek -
Why don’t you get Barack Hussein Obama on record re: helping Auchi enter the country?
Oh yeah, and Obama supporters would NEVER hand mud over to the GOP to toss at Hillary. NEVER.
Give me a break. No one here is saying anything the Republicans don’t already know. “Oooh, now you’ve said ‘Obama’ sounds like ‘Obama!’ The Republicans will use that and it will be all your fault!” Get a grip.
I meant “sounds like ‘Osama’” of course. Oooooh, I did it again! I bet the GOP would NEVER have noticed that!
Hey everyone don’t mention Obama’s middle name, either. Maybe we can keep that a secret from the Republicans this fall, too.
well, to chime in, without advocating, but relaying…I don’t know where the office was set up, but i’m quite familiar with Houston’s political cliques…especially the lefties…
Che is viewed quite different than a “thug” or a “terrorist” in many of the circles around here. To many, don’t know how many, Che represents both resistance to American empire, but to white colonial empire especially. The roots of this should be noticed above the image that people stop at.
I admit, I know nothing about Che, outside a timeline of events. I know I don’t support restoration of the Batiste Cuba of corruption and I generally support nationalism as an intermediate step to true sovereignty. After a while nationalism becomes something entirely different. But to a people like Venezuela, Bolivia, Cuba, it seems that it was a logical consequence to outside manipulation.
The US cuban policy is disgusting. It is the blight of our hemisphere and has only served to keep Castro in power, if you think thats a bad thing. Chavez feeds from the same misfortune and the United States still hasn’t learned.
I may be politically naive, but what Iraq did in 1971 with nationalizing the oil, with Morales doing the same thing, I can’t imagine I’d do much different if you elected me to the highest offices of those countries.
The same is true of a small sense of national identity I have when I consider multi-national corporations who take from our federal, state and local systems and give nothing back and fight like hell for their own sovereignty. Halliburton didn’t like our laws so they relocate their headquarters during the middle of a war. Microsoft is almost as powerful as the united states governement. You name it, we have conflicting interests to our national interests.
Che represents resistance to this in the minds of many younger active folks down here. The Marxist ideal is alive in many of them, and I can see why. They are sick of McNation. They are sick of racism, sexism, and bigotry. I don’t believe they have a workable, pragmatic future unless they are counting across many generations.
I will say, I respect their dedication, ability to work together to mount protests about police brutality, minute men immigration bigots, and many more causes they find important.
I don’t know where this picture was taken. Just calling it Obama’s office isn’t enough. I’ll see where it is taken and provide context.
I acknowledge what is being said about how this will be spun, especially by Fox…but then I’m moved to say, To hell with Fox, I don’t give a shit what they say…or was that MSNBC….I’m so confused.
2 miles from the beast in Houston.
final note on nationalism.
God Bless Scotland, to hell with Great Britain, restore independence, long live SNP.
over
Oh, great plan. I hope Obama responds to the sign by giving a clear, coherent argument like you just did, instead of just telling the idiots to take it down. In fact, I hope he buys a half-hour of television to explain why the sign isn’t so bad because Che represents many things to many people.
As a Hillary supporter, I really hope you are an advisor to the Obama campaign.
chris i daresay i must disagree with you … not on your che primer, that was fair and to the point … but for you to assume that obama supporters would even know all the details of che’s life and struggles is a bit of a stretch. most of the young oborgs i have spoken to aren’t aware of much except american pop culture. they do not represent the best of the critical thinkers of their generation.
bamabarrron,
I didn’t assume anything about “obama supporters”, i’m only relaying what I know about the locals, not assumption, based on the photo, and even said, I don’t know where that location is. Often here, one location serves several organizations. A Campaign office might be in the same center as a ‘peace and justice’ organization.
And I would be cautious about assuming what “young oborgs” are aware of, and limit them to our experiences. I know what you mean and I experience the same thing with young Ron Paul supporters who overlap with Alex Jones peeps. They cannot handle that I will not accept their 9/11 theories, though I can rattle them off verbatim to them. I don’t put my feet on sand and call it stable.
But…where do we disagree now? as you basically still agree with me, i think….could be wrong.
cheers
Ah, Scotland..one of the best places in the world. great place to drink a pint and call the English a bunch of wankers.
Any place that sends us the amber heather dew and Sheena Easton is alright by me. Only the weather and the English made my ancestors leave for Virginia.
you betcha. i really might not understand nationalism feeling if not for Scotland. You mention anything Scottish and every cell in my body wakes up and headbutts ye.
god bless belhaven. I’d love to have a belhaven with all of ye. and I promise to tip a cheer your way next time I do.
We can thank them for the recent spree of Planespotting as well.
Rendition being a USA/EU item.
I understand the point you are trying to make but just for fun, what kind of psychotic thug was Fulgencio Batista
The level this site has sunk to is comical. I still come here on occasion just to gloat and watch Chucky and Harpie from Under the Stairs (aka…) smear, flail and grope at straws while their National Security Candidate is going under. Now that the Obama nomination is almost a done deal, it is time to ask: What will Chucky and Harpie do in the fall: Run a Viva McCain/Lieberman site? And who finances that then?
I agree with you Guthman. Bad enough that the rightwingers throw crap on their sites, but to see the leftwing attack their own so viciously? No wonder the Democratic party has never been united, we eat our own too quickly.
If Susan and Larry are so afraid of the impact of anti-Obama attacks, what indeed are they going to do about the ongoing and increasing venom against their star candidate, Mrs. Bill “I didn’t have sex with her” Clinton?
Example at digby’s site: http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2008/02/cpac-dispatch-by-digby-and-then-theres.html
J -
Probably tell you that it’s nothing new and that you sound like a major loser is my guess.
OMG! Some pencil dick doesn’t like Hillary Rodham Clinton. I think that I’ll die from the shock of it all. Wow! That’s news from under a rock for ya!
wow J i feel your pain … you cant find a left wing blog that isnt smearing obama .. can you? this is snark you dumb son of a bitch.
go back to your obama loving blogs if you dont like what you are reading here … try dkos or huffington post … you can get all the obama adulation you can stomach. not much facts but then who cares hey.
wait…left wingers attack their own. This is the problem right here…how do I, or someone else become “left wing” and attack “our own” if, 1) I don’t espouse Left Wing policy, don’t agree with many “left wing” values”, and
2) I ain’t got no “my own” in this game. Obama isn’t my own. Clinton isn’t my own, nor was Edwards, Dodd, Biden, or anyone else. Kucinich is closer to being “my own” but thats only because I’ve actually met him, know about where he stands more than the rest, and had the bravery to call for impeachment.
People who want to impeach and incarcerate this administration and its enablers, are MY OWN. People who want to hold every single asshole in Washington and abroad for their crimes against our citizens and abroad, those are “my own” people.
I come here because this site is no bullshit. If you want Daily Kos, then go there. I hope you’ll stay and open your eyes up that these people, including the drive by jerks, are calling it like they see it. Don’t like it, thats you friend. This is an elective part of the web. Get used to it.
But ya doesn’t have to lump everyone in for your mental convenience. Your “Mrs Bill “i didn’t have sex with her” clinton sexist comment demostrates more of the same old crap.
Here’s the damn irony…weeks ago I said, I will not vote for either candidate. Each and every attack you launch on Hillary Clinton only makes me want to vote for her. And we have a primary in Texas in a few weeks, so buckle up bucko.
(Note My comments are my own, and any disrespectful idiot who cannot handle this reality needs to deal more with their issues than others.)
Whoever put up that flag (in case it was no photo-shop) should be fired for sheer stupidity.
But before going off on Obama let’s not forget Hillary Rodham activily supported the Black Panthers during her days at Yale Law School and the Panthers always displayed their hero Che Guevera.
S.Markom -
Great point! People mature. Why on Earth would mature adults vote for the hip-hop candidate? If I hear one Kennedy say my kids talked me into it I’ll puke.
That is false. Check snopes on it.
Thin-skinned Obama supporters, you’d better strap in. ‘Cause now it’s going to get a whole lotta ugly until March. For the next few days, the Che flag is going to go around the ‘net. Couple that with the narrative out there that Obama supporters are ‘cult-like crazed followers.’ Throw in a dash of uncertainty about Rezko, and you’ve got a storm brewing on the horizon that’ll break right around March 1.
Obama’s the media darling now. But that beast can turn on him on a dime. Bet on it.
every other Reagan-loving Harvard undergrad in the 80’s had a Che poster. it’s the ivy league equivalent of having the stars ‘n’ bars on your wall next to a picture of Molly Hatchet. it’s a juvenile gesture meant to freak out authority figures.
as soon as every office of the young republicans on every college campus purges their confederate flags, then i’ll take seriously such fooferah about a picture of Che Guevara in a democratic campaign office. i’ll bet more than half of the flying monkeys tasked with screeching about this didn’t even know who Che was before they got their marching orders.
as for leftist symbols, dude, Che is so played. everybody knows it’s all about Subcomondante Marcos these days….sheesh, they don’t make naive collegiate leftists like they used to. [although they DO seem to make right wing ranters EXACTLY like they used to - this whole thing strikes me as awfully Nixonian.....]
You know, I clicked on some of those right wing websites just to see their take on this and am reminded exactly why Susan posted this. No democratic nominee is safe from those bastards. None. Every one will write and say odious things about whoever the democratic candidate is and that is just the way it is. So, to all of you who are supporting Obama because you think he is more electable you should have your heads examined. He is going to get the same treatment that Hillary will get. The question is: How will he deal with it? and how will he overcome the right wing smear campaign? These are fair questions that everyone should be asking themselves. If you want to support Obama because you like his message or you like his flip-flopping, or you like his unwarranted arrogance then fine. That is great, more power to you. If you like him because you think the right wingers won’t attack him as much then you need to get a grip. The moral of the story that so many seem to have missed is that EVERY voter should vote for the candidate they like the best and not who the rightwingers find least offensive. I don’t really care if you vote or Hillary or Obama if they are the one you think will be the best president.
For me personally since I am a hard core partisan liberal I have to have the candidate that undoubtedly will stand up for the principles that I adore. That is why I am not voting for Obama. How many times is he going to say that he is not a liberal? How many ways? I want someone who is going to draw a line in the sand and not negotiate with those whack jobs on the conservative side. By stating that he isn’t a liberal Obama has already capitulated. He has already said to the conservatives that you are right and I am wrong. Nothing is more infuriating for me than having a candidate from either party who won’t stand up for the parties agenda or their own ideals. Republicans never have this problem, ever. They always state very clearly that they are conservatives and they dare anyone to attack them on it. Of course no one ever does. Why? Because they are convinced they are right.
Che is NO democratic hero, just a standard bearer for a failed ideology, one that wanted elections decided by a gun, hmmmmm who do we know that espouses that? Regunlicans!
The photo is probably a fake, Obama is no commie lefty, neither is our gal Hillary, they are both progressive democrats………
NOT looking forward to the convention now
tom in seattle
I don’t mean to burst anyone’s right wing bubble, but a)the cold war is over
b)we’re not republicans and do not recoil at the mention of Che
c)that office isn’t run by the Obama campaign, it’s a grass roots office and they can do whatever the hell they like
d)Jesus holy Crap, get a hold of yourselves.
precisely!
a)the cold war is over
With respect; you could not be more incorrect.
I cannot verify the photograph is and Obama office or that is was on Fox. Right wing blogs seem to be the only source. Not good.
Che Psychotic? I think not. Bush Psychopathic? I think so. Cheap shot Susan.
You folks have been reading too much of your own BS.
So now you’re branding the youth of America communist sympathizers while pretending to promote progressive liberalism; smells like Lee Atwater closet conservatism on steroids to me. What other Nixonian dirty little tricks have you got in your bag? You and your sycophants can’t manufacture a movement, movements are spontaneous phenomena that occur when the people have had enough of the type of dissembling and revisionist double speak that has taken over this forum. I am a “super delegate” to the Democrat Convention, and I can assure you all of one thing, there will be many of us there that will not tolerate anything but a fair and open convention; the public good will come before private advantage.
SirScud -
Good for you! I appreciate your voting for Hillary Rodham Clinton!
oh oh, i love drive by punditry, it has that particular funk!
Yes, I’m saying that there are politically active youth that are “communist sympathizers”! You bet! Thats because they are smart enough to see that McCarthy was a wingnut asshole and that a whole generation before them was stupid enough to bomb as much of the world as it could to stop the “communist surge”.
Yes, I’m saying that there are politically active youth that are smart enough to see through your bullshit SirScud, and all the arrogance and piss and vinegar you represent.
How dare you lump a group of people together and say, “You folks have been reading too much of your own BS” then spew out a bunch of crap “You and your sycophants”….and all your blather.
Look, chump, your party is dying from its own arrogance and elitist crap. Your “super-delegate” status can kiss my shiny ass. You will not tolerate anything that doesn’t smack of your perfect elitist view that is disguised as “open” and “fair”.
You claim the “public good” will come before “private advantage” but after announcing that you are a “SUPER-DELEGATE!” Dum-Dum, da, De Dum. How can you claim public good and private advantage in the same damn breath?!
You’ve been reading too much of your own bullshit friend. And you have maligned people en masse. This is the quality of your political culturing? This is the level of political engagement you are capable? Then to hell with your party, your status, and your convention. I’ll wait for your party to crumble, and I can wait longer than you’ll ever be able to imagine.
No incoming?
I can’t imagine what it will be like trying to heard cats amile high.