Comments on: Black Superdelegates Threatened, Pressured

By: Simon

Simon — Sat, 01 Mar 2008 03:04:13 +0000

“Felicia, Jeese,”

Ah, no imagination, no real color, just more drool from the wannabe crowd.

Maybe you should find a real writer, a real talent, instead of these wannbe ops you keep trying to disrupt, with.

You stink, foo.

You have no imagination, no talent, I guess the narcissism of crewbois doesn’t allow them to adequately assess their talent, or lack thereof.

You’re laughable.

You know how Kos and Adam are half assed lawyers, nothing special in Washington, or anywhere, really, a dime a dozen, yet they think they’re pretty hot, because they don’t get it, they just don’t have eyes, they’re narcissistic no talent twits?

You are that.

By: spega

spega — Sat, 01 Mar 2008 02:47:00 +0000

Banquo-
In response to your comment that everybody’s going after the super delegates. That may be true–BUT Obama’s pursuit has been on a wildly different level:
REALITY CHECK:_
“According to the Center for Responsive Politics- __Obama’s political action committee has doled out more than $694,000 to superdelegates since 2005, the study found, and of the 81 who had announced their support for Obama, 34 had received donations totaling $228,000. __Clinton’s political action committee has distributed about $195,000 to superdelegates, and only 13 of the 109 who had announced for her have received money, totaling about $95,000.”

By: felicia

felicia — Sat, 01 Mar 2008 02:17:53 +0000

The moral of the story is missing. That is Black Superdelegates should have automatically respected the will of their constituents. They are criminal in their neglect to do the jobs they were hired to do.
How long should status quo go unchallenged when Black children are shot down in the streets, and deprived of entitlements all other american children get without a fight. Black Superdelegates are showing their evil intent, they are dark hearted, they stand on the necks of Black Babies, they are the biggest threat to Black life in American. They have blood on their hands, they are the evildoers.
They can ignore the fact they are worth 10,000 votes, that is 10,000 black lives their status quo have a murdering hand in each year. The will of the people is the Will of God Speaking, serve my people these are the least of these, otherwise you are the bullies, and child murderers, and internal race extinctioners of our time. Therefore no Blacks can threaten or harass you, for you are the threat and the harrasser, the evil one, the murderers of children, and the shame of your ancestors.

By: Jessie

Jessie — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 06:27:01 +0000

I would like to take the time to thank ***blackcentury.com*** for the wonderful service they have provided. I met my husband through the site 1 year ago, we were two people of different cultures and countries. Yet, because of this great website we were brought together after finding love. Maybe you will love it.

By: Lu

Lu — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 06:06:58 +0000

Well Banquo, I was at a Washington caucus and I found most of the Obama supporters both naive and ill informed, especially on some of the claims they made about Obama. Many were also darn right aggressive. For those who were Hillary supporters it was an aweful experience. Some later told me they were afraid to say anything. How is that fair or democratic?

I kept thinking about the film Being There the 1971 novel written by Jerzy Kosiński. Obama succeeds because he can be everything to everyone — and mainly because nobody seems to know much about him. “He inspires me” is an intellectually vapid reason to vote for someone. I did not think much of him while at Harvard, he spoke well and did . . . nothing. I am at the point where I hope Gore steps in and wins.

By: Lu

Lu — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 05:29:16 +0000

Because he lied more . . .read on . . .They all do it. Even Barrack Obama, the bearer of change. In literature handed out at the Winslow ferry terminal this week, prospective caucusgoers were treated to a fair amount of, well, let’s be charitable and call it hyperbole. As in: “He passed $100 million in tax cuts for working families” during his years in the Illinois Legislature. Sorry, not even a governor can do that by himself. And. “He reformed a death penalty system that had sent 13 innocent people to death row.” Again, it takes more than one state senator to achieve that.–Kimberly Mills

By: Lu

Lu — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 05:25:45 +0000

Perhaps the reason Obama won so big in Washington was that he told the biggest lies that the caucus sheep “yes we ~~canned”~~ conned themselves into believing. Following are some of Obama’s whoppers. This is a consistant pattern of aggrandizing that Obama indulges in. Talk about delusions of grandeur!

On Feb. 9, 2008, the Seattle post-intelligencer ran a column by Kimberly Mills titled Snark Attack. Below is the column:

They all do it. Even Barrack Obama, the bearer of change. In literature handed out at the Winslow ferry terminal this week, prospective caucusgoers were treated to a fair amount of, well, let’s be charitable and call it hyperbole. As in: “He passed $100 million in tax cuts for working families” during his years in the Illinois Legislature. Sorry, not even a governor can do that by himself. And. “He reformed a death penalty system that had sent 13 innocent people to death row.” Again, it takes more than one state senator to achieve that.–Kimberly Mills.

By: Lu

Lu — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 05:02:43 +0000

Now why on earth would you be calling yourself after that scum bag Banquo? After all, Shakespeare borrowed the character from Holinshed’s Chronicles, (a history of Britain published in 1587.) The real Banquo was an accomplice to Macbeth in the murder of the King. Shakespeare, had to do a double cross and pretend that Banquo was something else — the good guy –for King James I, was a descendant of Banquo.

You don’t seem to know who’s who.

By: simon

simon — Sun, 17 Feb 2008 21:25:56 +0000

Quite frankly Hillary was destroyed in EVERY COUNTY in the state including the 2/3 of the state that is Republican territory.

Has anyone heard that republicans are crossing over in the primaries, and voting for Obama, as they think he will be easier for McCain to beat?

MyDD had a very interesting diary on this topic, but it has yet to be thoroughly investigated.

It certainly would explain a lot, wouldn’t it?

By: simon

simon — Sun, 17 Feb 2008 21:21:31 +0000

Lincoln bedroom jammie parties?

Hillary won’t get that far.

Word was the DNC put pressure on the Clinton’s to use the White House for donation purposes.

Bush had Abramoff in that role, and Obama, well, Obama just lies, or uses Rezko.

I wonder who Obama’s new Rezko is, still friendly to middle easterner um, money guys?

I suppose I’ll google “Saudi.”