<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Rashid Khalidi and the Risks for Obama</title>
	<link>http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/18/more-on-rashid-khalidi-and-the-risks-for-obama/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kerry, Irony and Hypocrisy &#171; DONE (Democrats Over Nominating Elitists)</title>
		<link>http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/18/more-on-rashid-khalidi-and-the-risks-for-obama/#comment-434360</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerry, Irony and Hypocrisy &#171; DONE (Democrats Over Nominating Elitists)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/18/more-on-rashid-khalidi-and-the-risks-for-obama/#comment-434360</guid>
		<description>[...] independents, Republicans and skeptical Democrats think of Wright, Rezko, Ayers, Johnson, Auchi, Khalidi, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] independents, Republicans and skeptical Democrats think of Wright, Rezko, Ayers, Johnson, Auchi, Khalidi, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judith</title>
		<link>http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/18/more-on-rashid-khalidi-and-the-risks-for-obama/#comment-238534</link>
		<dc:creator>Judith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 13:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/18/more-on-rashid-khalidi-and-the-risks-for-obama/#comment-238534</guid>
		<description>Unbelievable!  The days of Reporters getting down to the nitty gritty of a story seem to be over.  They've been so busy trying to push the girl out of the race that they've allowed a man to be on the brink of the Presidency without any vetting, whatsoever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unbelievable!  The days of Reporters getting down to the nitty gritty of a story seem to be over.  They&#8217;ve been so busy trying to push the girl out of the race that they&#8217;ve allowed a man to be on the brink of the Presidency without any vetting, whatsoever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The NYT hits and misses in its new profile of Obama [Karl]</title>
		<link>http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/18/more-on-rashid-khalidi-and-the-risks-for-obama/#comment-238518</link>
		<dc:creator>The NYT hits and misses in its new profile of Obama [Karl]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 13:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/18/more-on-rashid-khalidi-and-the-risks-for-obama/#comment-238518</guid>
		<description>[...] paper softpedals that Khalidi was a director of the official PLO press agency when the US State Department considered the PLO a terrorist [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] paper softpedals that Khalidi was a director of the official PLO press agency when the US State Department considered the PLO a terrorist [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uppity</title>
		<link>http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/18/more-on-rashid-khalidi-and-the-risks-for-obama/#comment-207871</link>
		<dc:creator>Uppity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 05:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/18/more-on-rashid-khalidi-and-the-risks-for-obama/#comment-207871</guid>
		<description>To the American public, perception....is everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the American public, perception&#8230;.is everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DianeJ</title>
		<link>http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/18/more-on-rashid-khalidi-and-the-risks-for-obama/#comment-207865</link>
		<dc:creator>DianeJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 05:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/18/more-on-rashid-khalidi-and-the-risks-for-obama/#comment-207865</guid>
		<description>Susan we can also add Jodi Evans and Hatem El-Hady according to reports two "other" interesting ties to Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan we can also add Jodi Evans and Hatem El-Hady according to reports two &#8220;other&#8221; interesting ties to Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susan</title>
		<link>http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/18/more-on-rashid-khalidi-and-the-risks-for-obama/#comment-194990</link>
		<dc:creator>susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 03:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/18/more-on-rashid-khalidi-and-the-risks-for-obama/#comment-194990</guid>
		<description>First Rezko, then Auchi, then Wright, now Ayers and Khalidi...does anyone see a pattern here??? Do we really want these anti-American, anti-Semitic, terrorist, black separatists, racist, criminal types that Obama associates with running through the halls of the White House along with the New Black Panther Party, Hamas, et al??? Wake up, people, and smell the Obama machine's catastrophic world plan!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First Rezko, then Auchi, then Wright, now Ayers and Khalidi&#8230;does anyone see a pattern here??? Do we really want these anti-American, anti-Semitic, terrorist, black separatists, racist, criminal types that Obama associates with running through the halls of the White House along with the New Black Panther Party, Hamas, et al??? Wake up, people, and smell the Obama machine&#8217;s catastrophic world plan!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomchaps</title>
		<link>http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/18/more-on-rashid-khalidi-and-the-risks-for-obama/#comment-194478</link>
		<dc:creator>tomchaps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/18/more-on-rashid-khalidi-and-the-risks-for-obama/#comment-194478</guid>
		<description>One brief point, Larry. I don't know if you snipped off the nasty bits, but what you excerpted didn't read like "hate mail" at all, but someone calling your research irresponsible, and attempting to back it up with evidence. Now, we can have a discussion of that evidence--but surely it's not necessary to call this hate mail. (Especially given the true hate found on all sides here...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One brief point, Larry. I don&#8217;t know if you snipped off the nasty bits, but what you excerpted didn&#8217;t read like &#8220;hate mail&#8221; at all, but someone calling your research irresponsible, and attempting to back it up with evidence. Now, we can have a discussion of that evidence&#8211;but surely it&#8217;s not necessary to call this hate mail. (Especially given the true hate found on all sides here&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomchaps</title>
		<link>http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/18/more-on-rashid-khalidi-and-the-risks-for-obama/#comment-194395</link>
		<dc:creator>tomchaps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/18/more-on-rashid-khalidi-and-the-risks-for-obama/#comment-194395</guid>
		<description>Poll after poll recently has shown that more current Clinton supporters will "defect" to McCain than Obama supporters will, if their candidate is not the nominee. These numbers are going up on both sides, unfortunately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poll after poll recently has shown that more current Clinton supporters will &#8220;defect&#8221; to McCain than Obama supporters will, if their candidate is not the nominee. These numbers are going up on both sides, unfortunately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Resnick</title>
		<link>http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/18/more-on-rashid-khalidi-and-the-risks-for-obama/#comment-190592</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Resnick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/18/more-on-rashid-khalidi-and-the-risks-for-obama/#comment-190592</guid>
		<description>Larry wrote...
&lt;em&gt;we are talking US politics and no national level politician can afford to be perceived as someone who will abandon our special relationship with Israel.&lt;/em&gt;

Perhaps it'd be more fruitful to discuss what's actually the most practical, most helpful policy positions... rather than focussing on how they're "perceived"?

None of knows how a politician's stance would be perceived. At best, we can study some past results, draw speculative conclusions about why people voted the way they did, make guesses about how voters will respond in the future, and then pretend that those guesses are truth.

We don't know which stance will be most successful in winning any particular election (let alone which political choices will lead to long-term success, beyond the current election). This strongly argues for less focus on how one's stance will be perceived, and more focus on what's &lt;strong&gt;right&lt;/strong&gt;.

Stuart Resnick
http://stuart-randomthoughts.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry wrote&#8230;<br />
<em>we are talking US politics and no national level politician can afford to be perceived as someone who will abandon our special relationship with Israel.</em></p>
<p>Perhaps it&#8217;d be more fruitful to discuss what&#8217;s actually the most practical, most helpful policy positions&#8230; rather than focussing on how they&#8217;re &#8220;perceived&#8221;?</p>
<p>None of knows how a politician&#8217;s stance would be perceived. At best, we can study some past results, draw speculative conclusions about why people voted the way they did, make guesses about how voters will respond in the future, and then pretend that those guesses are truth.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t know which stance will be most successful in winning any particular election (let alone which political choices will lead to long-term success, beyond the current election). This strongly argues for less focus on how one&#8217;s stance will be perceived, and more focus on what&#8217;s <strong>right</strong>.</p>
<p>Stuart Resnick<br />
<a href="http://stuart-randomthoughts.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://stuart-randomthoughts.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uppity</title>
		<link>http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/18/more-on-rashid-khalidi-and-the-risks-for-obama/#comment-190460</link>
		<dc:creator>Uppity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/18/more-on-rashid-khalidi-and-the-risks-for-obama/#comment-190460</guid>
		<description>zOMG! HALP US BAROK O’BOMBA– WE R STUCK HEAR N ALTOONA!!!!! SAV Uz!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zOMG! HALP US BAROK O’BOMBA– WE R STUCK HEAR N ALTOONA!!!!! SAV Uz!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
