RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Obama’s Books: Composite Characters, False Memories

People here have inquired about the accuracy of the books written by Barack Obama. Hundreds of thousands of people have read these books, and probably believe every word. However, several newspapers have verified that Obama admitted that he used composite characters in the books. Then there’s the investigative biography — over six full pages long — at the Chicago Tribune (and this link takes you to just ONE of the long articles exploring Obama’s past at the Tribune). Below, I quote from it. The quotes are long, but fascinating, particularly since the Chicago Tribune reporters wrote Obama’s history, and investigated his accounts, so thoroughly. While I’d ordinarily not quote so much from an article, it is so very long that you’ll want to go to the original article to read it in full. I am only excerpting the portions I recall from first reading it in December that relate to Obama’s false recall about his history.

First, there’s this quote from “The Delusional Style in American Punditry,” by the New Republic’s Sean Wilentz, Dec. 19, 2007 (”Forget experience: Opinion-slingers are mooning over Barack Obama’s instincts. Don’t they remember how badly that worked out last time?“):

The Boston Globe, in an ideal specimen of the delusional style, ran an editorial that endorsed Obama because he is biracial and grew up in “multi-ethnic cultures”–adequate substitutes, by the editorial’s lights, for serious background and expertise in foreign affairs. Obama, according to the Globe, has engaged in “a search for identity” and taken “a roots pilgrimage to Kenya,” all of which supposedly displays a “level of introspection, honesty, and maturity” that the newspaper longs for in a president. “Obama’s story is America’s story,” the Globe intoned–a sentence that comes as close as any distinguished newspaper ever has to perfect emptiness.

Let us hold aside that the book the Globe relied on in discovering these singular Obamaesque virtues, Dreams From My Father, contains composite characters and other fictionalized elements–not exactly a portrait of sterling honesty or authenticity. What is especially delusional is the Globe’s confidence that its own projections about Obama’s character and personality, as well as the mystical conclusions it draws from his ethnicity, are serious grounds for endorsing any candidate for any office, much less the presidency.

Now for the Tribune biography:

Here are instances of fabrication or colored memories or false memories, whatever you wish to call them from the Chicago Tribune story. For ease of reading, and brevity, I won’t indent these quotes:

[...]

At the same time, several of his oft-recited stories may not have happened in the way he has recounted them. Some seem to make Obama look better in the retelling, others appear to exaggerate his outward struggles over issues of race, or simply skim over some of the most painful, private moments of his life.

The handful of black students who attended Punahou School in Hawaii, for instance, say they struggled mightily with issues of race and racism there. But absent from those discussions, they say, was another student then known as Barry Obama.



In his best-selling autobiography, “Dreams from My Father,” Obama describes having heated conversations about racism with another black student, “Ray.” The real Ray, Keith Kakugawa, is half black and half Japanese. In an interview with the Tribune on Saturday, Kakugawa said he always considered himself mixed race, like so many of his friends in Hawaii, and was not an angry young black man.



He said he does recall long, soulful talks with the young Obama and that his friend confided his longing and loneliness. But those talks, Kakugawa said, were not about race. “Not even close,” he said, adding that Obama was dealing with “some inner turmoil” in those days.

”But it wasn’t a race thing,” he said. “Barry’s biggest struggles then were missing his parents. His biggest struggles were his feelings of abandonment. The idea that his biggest struggle was race is [bull].”



Then there’s the copy of Life magazine that Obama presents as his racial awakening at age 9. In it, he wrote, was an article and two accompanying photographs of an African-American man physically and mentally scarred by his efforts to lighten his skin. In fact, the Life article and the photographs don’t exist, say the magazine’s own historians.



Some of these discrepancies are typical of childhood memories — fuzzy in specifics, warped by age, shaped by writerly license. Others almost certainly illustrate how carefully the young man guarded the secret of his loneliness from even those who knew him best. And the accounts bear out much of Obama’s self-portrait as someone deeply affected by his father’s abandonment yet able to thrive in greatly disparate worlds.

[...]

Yet even Obama has acknowledged the limits of memoir. In a new introduction to the reissued edition of “Dreams,” he noted that the dangers of writing an autobiography included “the temptation to color events in ways favorable to the writer … [and] selective lapses of memory.”



He added: “I can’t say that I’ve avoided all, or any, of these hazards successfully.”

[...]

Memories of a racial awakening?



Obama has told the story–one of the watershed moments of his racial awareness–time and again, in remarkable detail.



He is 9 years old, living in Indonesia, where he and his mother moved with her new husband, Lolo Soetoro, a few years earlier. One day while visiting his mother, who was working at the U.S. Embassy in Jakarta, Obama passed time by looking through several issues of Life magazine. He came across an article that he later would describe as feeling like an “ambush attack.”



The article included photos of a black man who had destroyed his skin with powerful chemical lighteners that promised to make him white. Instead, the chemicals had peeled off much of his skin, leaving him sad and scarred, Obama recalled.

“I imagine other black children, then and now, undergoing similar moments of revelation,” Obama wrote of the magazine photos in “Dreams.”



Yet no such Life issue exists, according to historians at the magazine. No such photos, no such article. When asked about the discrepancy, Obama said in a recent interview, “It might have been an Ebony or it might have been … who knows what it was?” (At the request of the Tribune, archivists at Ebony searched their catalogue of past articles, none of which matched what Obama recalled.)



In fact, it is surprising, based on interviews with more than two dozen people who knew Obama during his nearly four years in Indonesia, that it would take a photograph in a magazine to make him conscious of the fact that some people might treat him differently in part because of the color of his skin.



Obama, who has talked and written so much about struggling to find a sense of belonging due to his mixed race, brushes over this time of his life in “Dreams.” He describes making friends easily, becoming fluent in Indonesian in just six months and melding quite easily into the very foreign fabric of Jakarta.



The reality was less tidy.



Obama and his mother joined her new husband, a kind man who later would become a detached heavy drinker and womanizer, family members in Indonesia say. Their Jakarta neighborhood resembled a village more than the bustling metropolis the city is today. Electricity had arrived only a couple of years earlier. Half the homes were old bamboo huts; half, including the Soetoro house, were nicer, with brick or concrete and red-tiled roofs.



Former playmates remember Obama as “Barry Soetoro,” or simply “Barry,” a chubby little boy very different from the gangly Obama people know today. All say he was teased more than any other kid in the neighborhood–primarily because he was bigger and had black features.



He was the only foreign child in the neighborhood. He also was one of the only neighborhood children whose parents enrolled him in a new Catholic school in an area populated almost entirely by Betawis, the old tribal landowning Jakarta natives who were very traditional Muslims. Some of the Betawi children threw rocks at the open Catholic classrooms, remembered Cecilia Sugini Hananto, who taught Obama in 2nd grade.



Teachers, former playmates and friends recall a boy who never fully grasped their language and who was very quiet as a result. But one word Obama learned quickly in his new home was curang, which means “cheater.”



When kids teased him, Obama yelled back, “Curang, curang!” When a friend gave him shrimp paste instead of chocolate, he yelled, “Curang, curang!”



Zulfan Adi was one of the neighborhood kids who teased Obama most mercilessly. He remembers one day when young Obama, a hopelessly upbeat boy who seemed oblivious to the fact that the older kids didn’t want him tagging along, followed a group of Adi’s friends to a nearby swamp.



“They held his hands and feet and said, `One, two, three,’ and threw him in the swamp,” recalled Adi, who still lives in the same house where he grew up. “Luckily he could swim. They only did it to Barry.”



The other kids would scrap with him sometimes, but because Obama was bigger and better-fed than many of them, he was hard to defeat.



“He was built like a bull. So we’d get three kids together to fight him,” recalled Yunaldi Askiar, 45, a former neighborhood friend. “But it was only playing.”



Obama has claimed on numerous occasions to have become fluent in Indonesian in six months. Yet those who knew him disputed that during recent interviews.



Israella Pareira Darmawan, Obama’s 1st-grade teacher, said she attempted to help him learn the Indonesian language by going over pronunciation and vowel sounds. He struggled greatly with the foreign language, she said, and with his studies as a result.



The teacher, who still lives in Obama’s old neighborhood, remembers that he always sat in the back corner of her classroom. “His friends called him `Negro,’” Darmawan said. The term wasn’t considered a slur at the time in Indonesia.



Still, all of his teachers at the Catholic school recognized leadership qualities in him. “He would be very helpful with friends. He’d pick them up if they fell down,” Darmawan recalled. “He would protect the smaller ones.”



Third-grade teacher Fermina Katarina Sinaga, now 67, has perhaps the most telling story. In an essay about what he wanted to be when he grew up, Obama “wrote he wanted to be president,” Sinaga recalled. “He didn’t say what country he wanted to be president of. But he wanted to make everybody happy.”



When Obama was in 4th grade, the Soetoro family moved. Their new neighborhood was only 3 miles to the west, but a world away. Elite Dutch colonists once lived there; the Japanese moved in during their occupation of Indonesia in World War II. In the early 1970s, diplomats and Indonesian businessmen lived there in fancy gated houses with wide paved roads and sculpted bushes.

[...]


Obama, however, was not a part of that group, according to Anthony and Smith. Both of them seemed surprised to hear that in “Dreams”–which neither of them had read–Obama writes about routinely going to parties at Schofield Barracks and other military bases in order to hang out with “Ray,” who like Anthony and Smith was two years ahead of him in school.



”We’d all do things together, but Obama was never there,” Smith said, adding that they often brought along the few other black underclassmen. “I went to those parties up at Schofield but never saw him at any of them.”



Obama devotes many words in his book to exploring his outsider status at Punahou. But any struggles he was experiencing were obscured by the fact that he had a racially diverse group of friends–many of whom often would crowd into his grandparents’ apartment, near Punahou, after school let out.



One of those kids was Orme, a smart, respectful teenager from a white, middle-class family. Though Orme spent most afternoons with Obama and considered him one of his closest friends, he said Obama never brought up issues of race, never talked about feeling out of place at Punahou.



“He never verbalized any of that,” Orme said during a telephone interview from his home in Oregon. “He was a very provocative thinker. He would bring up worldly topics far beyond his years. But we never talked race.”



Whatever misgivings Obama had about Punahou, attending the school was largely his decision.


[...]

“Junkie. Pothead. That’s where I’d been headed: the final, fatal role of the young would-be black man,” Obama wrote in “Dreams.”



In the book, Obama discusses race and racism at his high school with one other Punahou student, “Ray,” the young black man described in detail in “Dreams” as perpetually angry at the white world around him. “It’s their world, all right,” Ray supposedly shouts at Obama. “They own it and we in it. So just get the f— outta my face.”



But Kakugawa, in the interview Saturday, said Obama’s recollection of that conversation was mistaken. “I did say we were playing in their world,” he explained, “but that had nothing to do with race. He knew that.”



Kakugawa explained that he had meant they were playing in the world of the elite people who populated and ran Punahou–famous Hawaiian families like the Doles, owners of the pineapple fortune, or the original developers of Waikiki, the tourist mecca. “It just wasn’t a race thing,” he reiterated again and again.



Obama confirmed in an interview earlier this month that the Ray character in “Dreams” actually is Kakugawa.



In another passage from the book, Ray complains that white Punahou girls don’t want to date black guys and that he and Obama don’t get enough playing time as athletes, speculating that they’d be “treated different if we was white. Or Japanese. Or Hawaiian. Or f—— Eskimo.”



But Kakugawa, a convicted drug felon, said Saturday that he had never been the “prototypical angry black guy” that Obama portrays. Because of his biracial heritage, he said, he was “like everyone in Hawaii, a mix of a lot of things.”



A close friend and track teammate of Kakugawa, John Hagar, also said he was surprised by Obama’s description of the character representing Kakugawa as an angry young black man. “I never picked up on that,” Hagar said. “He was just one of those perfect [ethnic] mixes of everything you see in Hawaii.”



Asked Saturday about Kakugawa’s recollections, the Obama campaign declined to make the senator available. But spokesman Bill Burton said Obama “stands by his recollections of these events as related in his book.”



“There’s no doubt that Keith’s story is tragic and sad,” Burton added.



While Obama rocketed to political prominence, his friend headed down the troubled road Obama had feared he was following. Since 1995, Kakugawa has spent more than 7 years in California prisons and months in Los Angeles County Jail on cocaine and auto theft charges.



Another story put forth in “Dreams” as one of Obama’s pivotal moments of racial awakening checks out essentially as he wrote it. Obama recounts taking two white friends, including Orme, to a party attended almost entirely by African-Americans.



According to the book, the characters representing Orme and the other friend asked to leave the party after just an hour, saying they felt out of place. The night, Obama later wrote, made him furious as he realized that whites held a “fundamental power” over blacks.



“One of us said that being the different guys in the room had awakened a little bit of empathy to what he must feel all the time at school. And he clearly didn’t appreciate that,” Orme said. “I never knew, until reading the book later, how much that night had upset him.”


Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post43 Comments »

Comment by AF | 2008-02-19 00:47:02

Well the most damaging is this part:

Yet even Obama has acknowledged the limits of memoir. In a new introduction to the reissued edition of “Dreams,” he noted that the dangers of writing an autobiography included “the temptation to color events in ways favorable to the writer … [and] selective lapses of memory.”



He added: “I can’t say that I’ve avoided all, or any, of these hazards successfully.”

And his claim to have learned Indonesian in just six months - if the teacher recalls it differently, that he had trouble with the foreign language, and therefore the rest of his studies, why didn’t he include that in the new introduction to “Dreams”? Weird.

Interesting.

Comment by Simon | 2008-02-19 00:53:29

“I can’t say that I’ve avoided all, or any, of these hazards successfully.”

Wasn’t this also his line in regard to the Chicago corruption?

Boy, he really is bereft of ideas.

Comment by Mike Howell | 2008-02-19 08:57:33

Barack Hussein Obama doesn’t try to avoid hazards - he seeks them. Did someone force him to write 2 crappy books? Did someone force him to hit up Rezko for a mansion?

He’s all about the quick cash!

Michelle Obama, his wife was asking for corporate experience e.g. Board of Director spots as soon as he got the Senator gig.

The Charlatan from Chicago isn’t interested in morals and ethics; he’s about the quick cash!

Obama was the star in the corrupt Daley machine. He went against all of the reform candidates. Do you really think he cares about anything, but pay to play?!

 
 
 

Comment by AF | 2008-02-19 00:48:25

I’ll read the full Chicago Trib bio.

 

Comment by reader | 2008-02-19 01:07:21

Interestingly, most of what is written about Obama is usally spent examining autobiographical details.

With Clinton, there is little of that sort of thing. Some of that is of course due to the fact that she is a known quantity, but it is also due to the fact that she has a great deal of policy and professional achievement that people can debate and examine.

That is one of the questions Democrats should ask themselves, are they better off going with the platform or the personality. It is said that generals often make the mistake of fighting the last war, can the same be said of parties? There is no question that in 2000 and 2004 many voters cast their ballots based on perceived personal likeability (Gore v. Bush, Kerry v. Bush). But might 2008 be the year they choose substance over style so-to-speak, particularly given the serious issues facing the nation. If so, McCain likely wins in November against the relatively inexperienced, and details-lite candidate Obama.

 

Comment by Sandy | 2008-02-19 01:07:46

Honestly, I’m afraid for this country if he wins it.

 

Comment by Gabriele Droz | 2008-02-19 01:35:50

Susan,

I can’t find a way to sign up to No-Quarters. Some commenters’ posts are highlighted/linked, and some are not. I’d like to sign up here if that’s an option. One of the few sane places that retains a long-term perspective. The Obama folks are swarming like termites to take over all the blogs everywhere, and I’m so sick and tired of it. It’s happening at MYDD, Talk Left, Left Coaster, and even here. It’s sickening, and dis-heartening. I’d like to make a difference here. I’m not an expert writer, but I can speak from my heart.

Comment by SusanUnPC | 2008-02-19 04:42:31

Hi, Gabriele. You may sign up for our daily news letter — that’s over in the right column. It arrives once daily.

NOW, we have a new option. As you post a new comment, just above the Bold, Italic, and other buttons, you’ll see a “Subscribe to comments via email” and you can click that button. i believe you’ll need to do that for each thread.

I hope that begins to answer your request. If you have other ideas, we can explore them within the always-changing options for WordPress. Many of our readers’ requests have led us to new options that help regular visitors.

 

Comment by Missy | 2008-02-19 19:37:53

I got banned from Americablog.com because I kept pointing out the hypocracy of the Obama campaign and his supporters. Americablog is only for Obama lovers and Clinton haters.

 
 

Comment by Alien | 2008-02-19 02:18:56

Bahasa Indonesian is not a difficult language to learn s-.Most people can pick it up in 6 months of living there.At 9 years it should have been relatively easy .

Comment by chris | 2008-02-19 02:22:35

but the point is, didn’t his teacher say he had a real hard time learning it and it led him to isolation?

 
 

Comment by DisenfranchisedVoter | 2008-02-19 02:22:09

I am of mixed race and I do sympathize with Obama. I am going to guess that he was probably a very confused, lonely, and awkward boy growing up. From the other accounts I’ve read about him, he’s always been quite aloof. He probably shares some resentment and bitterness towards the world which is okay. I think experiences like this make people stronger and more motivated to go into professions like politics to not only change the world but to build that lack of self-esteem and self-importance that was probably missing in his life which is why he has felt the need to make things up and embrace his current role as a messiah.

That said, his story should not be a reason to vote for him, especially when much of that story has been embellished. It is unfortunate that Obama, who had the unique ability to address issues of race head on as a mixed person, has instead used race to divide the Democratic party even further in order to portray his opponents as racists. His tactics in this election have made me lose even more respect for him. The plagiarism was just the cherry on top of a campaign that has strayed so far from reality that I would have problems even voting for him in the general election. This image Obama and Axelrod have invented might resolve a lot of the self image issues from Obama’s childhood but it is disillusioning our youth and people who need a psychologist rather than a president to make them feel good about themselves.

I am also disappointed in the many Democrats who have proven that our party can be as fickle and ignorant as Republicans. Didn’t we learn anything from Bush? Are we really planning to elect someone because he is “likable” and has an entertaining memoir on the bestsellers list? What happened to the issues in this campaign? It’s amazing that even after blatant plagiarism and a nearly exact campaign as Deval Patrick, his followers are still defending him rather than thinking about how they’ve been duped this entire time to worship a man rather than do the right thing for our country’s future.

I don’t know when people will start coming around and analyze his record. Hopefully after this plagiarism story a few Obamabots will start to see the light and realize thata Obama is a flawed man and not the second coming of Jesus.

Comment by Simon | 2008-02-19 09:10:02

He probably shares some resentment and bitterness towards the world which is okay. I

Not if he intends to be President, it’s not.

Bitterness as a motivator is highly destructive, in the end, he will make decisions from shallow emotion, “poor me,” (sound familiar?) as opposed to a soaring world vision. Bush also felt, feels a tremendous amount of resentment toward his parents. There must be something to the idea men who suffer from infantile narcissism, Bush and Obama, for instance, (IMO) gravitate toward Rovian tactics.

Rove hated the boomers, too, liberal boomers, though really, IMO, he is simply projecting his self hate.

 
 

Comment by SusanUnPC | 2008-02-19 05:24:42

My daughter found this in the review of Obama’s book at Amazon:

91 of 127 people found the following review helpful:

Fun message, but shallow vision for real progress, March 27, 2007

By F.Faulkner “F.F.” (Hartford, CT USA) - See all my reviews

This review is from: The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the
American Dream (Hardcover)

I read the book after buying it at a book signing. It was my second
Obama book. It was very readable, entertaining and people-pleasing. I
don’t think his messages have much to say to seniors or baby-boomers. He should be a youth counselor and mentor, not president.

After his book signing, as I waited for my ride home, I watched for an
hour as people met Mr. Obama to get their book signed. With “young”
people under 40-ish, he was animated, smiling, pouring on the charm.

With folks over 40-ish, he appeared bored and had nothing much to say to them. Watch it on c-span sometime and see what you think. It was incredibly obvious and made me read the book even more closely to see what his message is. I was not ultimately left with much of an
impression that he can lead our country and represent the future.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews

[THIS FITS with his disdain for “boomers,” etc. that I’ve heard many times from him. Some have theorized it has to do with his bitterness towards his mother. After all, as you’ll see in the Tribune bio, she shipped him off to Hawaii to live with her parents, and for schooling — but that must have hurt him. Perhaps she was more “into” her young daughter and Indonesian husband. I dont know. I’ve also been perplexed by his TV ad complaining that insurance companies cost his mother her fight against cervical cancer — although he never quite explains how. Nor does he explain how he could not, and did not (?), intervene to fight for her rights, or financially assist her — both he and his wife were making good money as attorneys in Chicago at the time. I’m just wondering — it’s something that’s bugged me.)

Comment by AF | 2008-02-19 07:21:23

He must’ve been in his thirties when she died, maybe around the time that he was writing this book? This is interesting. The commercial says she was more worried about paying her medical bills than getting well.

And he chose to be a community organizer at this time. But I believe Michelle was a corporate lawyer. I didn’t read the books, so I wouldn’t know.

Comment by Mike Howell | 2008-02-19 09:03:19

The books are crap that was written to make a quick buck. His timeline doesn’t add up and he admits that he invented people and events.

Instead read Rezko’s indictment. Sure it’s less imaginative, but it’s more informative and vastly more interesting and insightful.

Comment by AF | 2008-02-19 11:48:47

Mike where is the best timeline that lays out all the Rezko details (OK I’m lazy, but I already voted.)

Comment by Mike Howell | 2008-02-19 16:04:35

Comment by Mike Howell | 2008-02-19 19:46:16

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by AF | 2008-02-19 07:24:04

The disdain for boomers is pretty intense, something I’ve noticed a while. “Turn the page” on all that. Made sense, but coupled with very little acknowledgement of the progress made in the 1960s and 1970s was suspect. When he talked about Martin Luther King - well really Hillary talked more about what MLK had to go through, “he put himself on the line, he faced firehoses” Hillary said. Weird.

But now, when Michelle says “for the first time in my adult life, I’m really proud of my country” - all of this together is very strange.

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-02-19 08:34:59

I’d bet that someone is already drawing up the plans for the Baby Boomer Re-Education Camps.

Che would be SO proud!

So, what will be emblazoned on the gates thereof?

Arbeit Macht Frei!” or, “Turn A Page?

 
 

Comment by Cujo359 | 2008-02-19 14:59:35

I’d guessed some time ago, perhaps here, that Obama had abandonment issues, since one parent left him at an early age (two, I think), and the other was a professional who later died of a long illness. It looks like that is true, based on some of the things I read in Larry’s article.

My guess is that when he sees people who are older than 40, he sees his parents, at least a little. That may account for some of the boredom.

 

Comment by Maria | 2008-05-09 12:16:35

As an onlooker from Australia, where we have all felt the effects of the sub prime mortgage disaster in the US due to the catastrophic domino effect on world markets, it appears that this next US election is critical for the health of your nation and for global economy.

A lot of us here are following the Democrats primary voting. It is sad that Obama is caught up in such a terrible fantasy, dragging in so many, like fans at a pop concert!

He might make a good job of it but not with this big two ton block sitting on his shoulder (race issues). Effective politicians implement policies that work - what has he actually done?

The comment regarding his performance at a book signing is very revealing.

 
 

Comment by DCDemocrat | 2008-02-19 07:35:37

I swear to God: If Obama gets the nod, it’s going to make Dukakis look like a super hero.

Comment by SusanUnPC | 2008-02-19 07:40:06

Can you see Obama riding around in a tank with a helmet on? (Snark: I wonder if the helmet will fit over his halo.)

 
 

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-02-19 08:31:29

When Joe Kennedy Sr. hired help to craft JFK’s Profiles in Courage, at least he got some REAL writers!

Comment by Simon | 2008-02-19 08:52:00

JFK could write, though, Obama can’t.

I wondered who the ghost writer was, too.

Obama doesn’t seem to make good decisions, a victim of herd thinking, symptomatic of his generation, his acolytes.

How ANYONE with the slightest bit of information can think this man is qualified to be President is beyond me.

And I’m tired of those people who keep putting their egos ahead of the welfare of this country.

 
 

Comment by Mr.Murder | 2008-02-19 08:53:14

The air base here had a wonderful pallette of race and ethnic backgrounds. Kids moving in would overcome the isolation of their traditional background soon after their arrival. It seems like military life made people adapt faster as well.

Often kids of Asian background would joke how good friends they were when if they lived in the origin countries of their bloodlines it would be improper or forbidden to be friends.

“Mom would hate to find out how nice you are.”

 

Comment by BluestBlue | 2008-02-19 14:07:21

Paging Oprah: Obama’s James Frey moment has arrived!

I wonder if Oprah will devote a show to tearing Obama down when she reads that his memoir shares much in common with James Frey’s book, “A Million Little Pieces”?

Will Oprah feel as duped by Obama as she was by James Frey? Why didn’t she look into Barack Obama a little more closely after being already being duped by James Frey and his memoir? Wasn’t that a watershed moment for her?

From the live blogging link above:

4:00 p.m. Yeah, reading Gawker’s account of the taping earlier today spoiled some of this, but the printed account can’t do justice to the rare sight of Oprah in righteous-anger mode. She begins with a brief recap of the scandal surrounding A Million Little Pieces, up to her phone call to Larry King defending Frey. ”I regret that phone call. I made a mistake, and I left the impression that the truth does not matter.” Snap! ”To everyone who challenged me on the issue of truth, you are absolutely right.”
4:05 Oprah confronts Frey face to face. ”I really feel duped. More than that, I feel you betrayed millions of readers.”

We knew the press was refusing to give us information that would disrupt their lovely narrative of Obama as the worthy contender triumphing over Hillary, but good lord!

Obama’s pilfered remark “Just Words” takes on an added significance now. It truly is “Just Words” for Obama!

The whole discussion of the importance of words and why it mattered that his speeches were not his own words since that is all his campaign was based on… this news about his books raises the “words” discussion to a whole new level of importance!

I can’t imagine what else is out there lying in the weeds. We know about Rezko, the fund raiser and the “mansion purchase enabler”, now his fictional autobiography, what else is out there?

 

Comment by Cee | 2008-02-19 14:49:38

She Still Takes a Villager — Hillary’s Authorship Lies
By Warner Todd Huston | December 1, 2007 - 11:40 ET
Venerable book publishers Simon and Schuster have announced that on December 12th they will be issuing a new edition of Hillary Clinton’s starry-eyed 1996 paean to socialist collectivism, It Takes a Village — starring none other than Mz. inevitability herself, Hillary Clinton. I’m sure the rafters will once again tremble with hosannas for Clinton’s “hard work” in writing the book and she will again be heralded as a wonderful stylist. All due praise will be lavished upon the former first lady, current Senator, and unsurprising candidate for the Democrat Party nomination for President of the United States of America. Actually, I’ll have to take that back because Hillary won’t be receiving all due praise for her efforts on the book. She will be getting far, far more than she deserves. Why, you might ask? Because she wrote barely a word of the book that bears her name, that’s why. And worse, since 1996 Clinton has lied repeatedly claiming she wrote it all by herself, refusing to acknowledge that it was ghostwritten by someone else.

Comment by Cujo359 | 2008-02-19 15:12:24

Oh, for crying out loud, she had a ghostwriter:

On April 22nd, 1995, as the book was in the planning stages, The New York Times reported that it was Feinman who was to do the heavy lifting for the project. In their ’95 piece the Times then said,

“The book will actually be written by Barbara Feinman, a journalism professor at Georgetown University in Washington. Ms. Feinman will conduct a series of interviews with Mrs. Clinton, who will help edit the resulting text.”

Even though since publication, Hillary Clinton has claimed to have written the tome herself, the actual writer begs to differ. In a Sept. 2002 piece that appears on the website for The Association of Writers & Writing Programs (AWP), Barbara Feinman Todd told the odd story of Hillary’s blatant theft of credit due Feinman for her work on It takes a Village. Trying her best to downplay Clinton’s outrageous actions and lies,

blah, blah, blah.

You must have known this was BS, Cee, or you’d have provided this link. Neglected ghost writers are a part of the business. It’s to Clinton’s discredit that she didn’t acknowledge she had one, but this seems a pretty minor point. The story, such as it was, was Clinton’s. Her ghostwriter did the editing and some research, it appears. Pretty typical division of labor, I think. It’s also pretty typical for that writer to feel cheated when the book does well and she isn’t well compensated. I know a writer or two, and this sort of thing is sadly typical.

Leave it to Obama people to take something a little hinky and turn it into a federal case.

Comment by Cee | 2008-02-19 15:26:09

LOLOLOLOL! The dog that howls was struck by the stone.

Hillary kicked her ghostwriter to the curb and took the credit herself. She’s a liar.

Comment by norrismorris | 2008-02-19 16:32:18

Totally untrue. Everone knew she had ghost writer. Attribute your material with specfic sources.

Maureen Dowd, an opinion Hillary hit writer at the NY Times, is not attribution. She never attributes on stuff like this. She just trashes Hillary indiscriminately on and an in an opinion column.

Please quote attribution so fact check can resolve the source of this falsely circulated
story which is untrue and repeated by right wing, HuffPo and Dowd long with Bob Novack and Ann Coulter, et al.

This is sickening stuff.

 
 

Comment by norrismorris | 2008-02-19 15:33:17

Absolutely everyone knew that Barbara F was the ghost writer. Anti Hillary screeds and Rovedupes kept making up shit like this. Maureen Dowd is a pathological hillary Hater. To such an extent that her NYTimes column was written by her indicated as in New Hampshire. Dowd was abroad at this time, and a surrogate was on the ground for Dowd as she then called her article in. She’s the predictable Hillary Hit Hater, as was her Editor, the deposed Howell Raines who was one of her boyfriends. This is Journalism?? Please.

Dowd and the entire press have repeatedly mis stated, lied, and exaggerated many stories so often it’s dizzying. I am not saying Hillary is perfect by any means, but some of this smutty dirt is so discredited by reality and simple fact checking, that it doesn’t deserve an answer, but you have swallowed as much kool aid that you can hold. Your comments are traditionally inaccurate and this one takes the prize.

 
 

Comment by norrismorris | 2008-02-19 15:21:03

Don’t vote for her, but this does not absolve Obama from being held responsible for his Illinois past, his lobbyist money taking with Exelon, his ties to Rev Wright, Farrakhan admirerer, and pastor and friend of Obama. There is much more and it’s important.

Or being currently advised by Carter’s security and foregn policy advisors, all Palestine hawks and anti Israeli.

Reverend Josiah Wright, Obama’s pastor gave a medal to Farrakhan last year as ,”He epitomized greatness”. Farrakhan who has said, “Judaism is a “gutter religion”, anf Jews are bloodsuckers”.

When distancing himself from friend Rev Wright, Wright told the New York Times, “he feared Obama’s Jewish support will dry up quicker than a snowball in hell”.

Obama also has had trouble distancing from Zbigniew Brzensky, Carter’s security advisor responsible for
his fiasco regarding the Hostage Crisis in being unable to negotiate releasing the hostages which Reagan was able to do.

Zbig is a known hawk hard liner pro Palestine and anti Israel hack and along with him are a cadre of his advisors, as Susan Rice and some other leftover Clintonites and Carterites. This is the NEW Washington?

George Soros, Obama’s main multibillionaire backer Hedge Fund maven, is a known Pro Palestine hawk and would like to see Israel disappear. Soros, a self hating Jew has made his views known many times. He wants to break up the loathsome Israeli lobby currently ensconced in DC, but removing this bunch of hard liners with another group of hard liners is certainly not a solution to creating a lasting detente between Palestine and Israel.

Carter’s administration went down with this policy, but his recently published book with Pro Palestine rant created a firstorm among the Jewish Communties internationally.

So don’t for Clinton. No problem. But being so hypnotized that you don’t know anything, and don’t WANT to know anything negative but hype about Mr GolDen is headed for DISASTER.

 

Comment by TeakwoodKite | 2008-02-19 15:45:51

ghostwritten by someone else.
Who?

 
 

Pingback by More Proof of Plagiarism, Stories Don’t Add Up : NO QUARTER | 2008-02-19 20:38:10

[...] “Obama’s Books: Composite Characters, False Memories” [...]

 

Comment by Smilin' Jim | 2008-02-20 20:42:52

Did he write these books?

Brent Bozell, William F. Buckley’s brother-in-law wrote Goldwater’s books. JFK had help from Ted Sorensen on Profiles In Courage. Why should Obama be different?

 

Pingback by Presidential election 2008 |Republicans Vs. Democrats » Obama’s Books: Composite Characters, False Memories | 2008-02-21 07:30:01

[...] Sarah Ramey wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptPeople here have inquired about the accuracy of the books written by Barack Obama. Hundreds of thousands of people have read these books, and probably believe every word. However, several newspapers have verified that Obama admitted … Read the rest of this great post here Posted by [...]

 

Pingback by Obama Throws His Grandmother From The Train [Updated] : NO QUARTER | 2008-03-19 16:07:24

[...] will want to read it in full for its essential background on the two books by Sen. Obama: “Obama’s Books: Composite Characters, False Memories.” [...]

 

Pingback by Barack Obama’s Typical Awful White Grandmother : NO QUARTER | 2008-04-09 11:04:32

[...] NoQuarter: Obama’s Books: Composite Characters and False Memories [...]

 

Comment by tpevorus | 2008-05-08 09:50:37

I can’t understand why obama insists on focusing on any negative aspect of his youth experience instead of realizing the amazing opportunity that is now in front of him, dispite his poor judgement in picking associates and friends. His wife has the same victim like complex. He has massive support among white voters even thought he sees them as an inferior and bigoted race of people. His beleif system mirrors that of rev. jeramiah wright’s. People fail to see the real obama because the media has created this false image for him in which he portrays almost impecably. His speeches are well written and he reads them well off a telaprompter. So to those who don’t care to look any farther then bias news on cnn and don’t understand government politics this mans an utter genius, a real savior. It reminds me a little of someone else who came along in a great time of need. No one bothered to read his book either. He had all the answers and a great following along with amazing charisma. Yes you guessed it , hitler. I’m not exactly comparing him to hitler, but when you look deeper then the surface and understand what he’s about his speeches will reveal thier coded real meaning. Thats when you will be able to make a rational decision on what his candidacy really is all about. The farahkans, sharptons and rev. wrights of the world understand this all too well. It’s time to wake up.

 

Pingback by Obama Lies Because He Can: « Riggword Weblog | 2008-06-24 14:36:32

[...] [...]

 

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
noq-adbutton1.gif