<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hype?  Let&#8217;s talk about &#8220;Hype&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/21/hype-lets-talk-about-hype/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/21/hype-lets-talk-about-hype/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 04:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fall of the Hillites</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/21/hype-lets-talk-about-hype/#comment-143111</link>
		<dc:creator>Fall of the Hillites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/21/hype-lets-talk-about-hype/#comment-143111</guid>
		<description>What a farce.  You've left out a tremendous amount of Obama's substantive legislation (for example, the Lugar-Obama act), including everything he carried out in Illinois (sure, it's state law but it's awfully substantial state law).  "Hillary showed tremendous leadership after 9/11"?  Really?  Where?  She expedited payments and extended deadlines.  That's nice.  Did she mandate providing aid to relief workers?  Did she legislate EPA mandates to ensure people weren't working in dangerous conditions at and around ground zero?  Did she do anything &lt;em&gt;more&lt;/em&gt; than the minimum a NY senator could do after 9/11?  You certainly haven't provided any evidence of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a farce.  You&#8217;ve left out a tremendous amount of Obama&#8217;s substantive legislation (for example, the Lugar-Obama act), including everything he carried out in Illinois (sure, it&#8217;s state law but it&#8217;s awfully substantial state law).  &#8220;Hillary showed tremendous leadership after 9/11&#8243;?  Really?  Where?  She expedited payments and extended deadlines.  That&#8217;s nice.  Did she mandate providing aid to relief workers?  Did she legislate EPA mandates to ensure people weren&#8217;t working in dangerous conditions at and around ground zero?  Did she do anything <em>more</em> than the minimum a NY senator could do after 9/11?  You certainly haven&#8217;t provided any evidence of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: themomcat</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/21/hype-lets-talk-about-hype/#comment-142628</link>
		<dc:creator>themomcat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/21/hype-lets-talk-about-hype/#comment-142628</guid>
		<description>I used to spent a lot of time at "Agent Orange" but since they have declared Obama the "inevitable" candidate and the animosity towards anyone criticizing  him, I only post in neutral diaries that seem to be fewer. Thanks for this balanced look at Senate records.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to spent a lot of time at &#8220;Agent Orange&#8221; but since they have declared Obama the &#8220;inevitable&#8221; candidate and the animosity towards anyone criticizing  him, I only post in neutral diaries that seem to be fewer. Thanks for this balanced look at Senate records.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwrjr</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/21/hype-lets-talk-about-hype/#comment-142610</link>
		<dc:creator>jwrjr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/21/hype-lets-talk-about-hype/#comment-142610</guid>
		<description>I see that the DailyObama has determined that Obama IS the democratic candidate and Clinton should quit with the 'scorched earth' strategy.  While I would hesitate in betting money on Clinton being the candidate, it is more than a little too early to be making that proclamation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see that the DailyObama has determined that Obama IS the democratic candidate and Clinton should quit with the &#8217;scorched earth&#8217; strategy.  While I would hesitate in betting money on Clinton being the candidate, it is more than a little too early to be making that proclamation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeakWoodKite</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/21/hype-lets-talk-about-hype/#comment-142589</link>
		<dc:creator>TeakWoodKite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 22:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/21/hype-lets-talk-about-hype/#comment-142589</guid>
		<description>Simon, If I walk up to you with cash and say make it happen, the cash doesn't care, the banker doesn't care, and voters don't know if it from Karl or Karl c/o Obama. Web sites are not that expensive to set up.

Since they are not asking for money, it avoids certain FEC laws I'd think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simon, If I walk up to you with cash and say make it happen, the cash doesn&#8217;t care, the banker doesn&#8217;t care, and voters don&#8217;t know if it from Karl or Karl c/o Obama. Web sites are not that expensive to set up.</p>
<p>Since they are not asking for money, it avoids certain FEC laws I&#8217;d think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeakWoodKite</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/21/hype-lets-talk-about-hype/#comment-142586</link>
		<dc:creator>TeakWoodKite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 22:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/21/hype-lets-talk-about-hype/#comment-142586</guid>
		<description>Mr McCoy; Sorry, I missed something. I saw nothing to indicate a post that would "question our ethnicity, or racial views." on this thread.
Please clarify if you can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr McCoy; Sorry, I missed something. I saw nothing to indicate a post that would &#8220;question our ethnicity, or racial views.&#8221; on this thread.<br />
Please clarify if you can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamal McCoy</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/21/hype-lets-talk-about-hype/#comment-142543</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamal McCoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/21/hype-lets-talk-about-hype/#comment-142543</guid>
		<description>The notion that the website www.stop-obama.org is racist, is sheer nonsense. 

We are a group of five writers, only one of whome is white, and he's Jewish! 

We are multicultural, and we don't find any appeal from Obama's nonsense. 

Does He use race to his advantage? 

Damn right! 

Do we have a right to talk about it?

Damn right?

Anyone labeling us racists, has a big problem. 

Our research is honest, solid. Tough. 

I regret that bloggers at this site question our ethnicity, or racial views. 

Its sad. Not only because Obama relies a great deal on his ability to silence debate on the issue, but also because it amounts to a calumny. 

Thank you
Jamal McCoy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The notion that the website <a href="http://www.stop-obama.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.stop-obama.org</a> is racist, is sheer nonsense. </p>
<p>We are a group of five writers, only one of whome is white, and he&#8217;s Jewish! </p>
<p>We are multicultural, and we don&#8217;t find any appeal from Obama&#8217;s nonsense. </p>
<p>Does He use race to his advantage? </p>
<p>Damn right! </p>
<p>Do we have a right to talk about it?</p>
<p>Damn right?</p>
<p>Anyone labeling us racists, has a big problem. </p>
<p>Our research is honest, solid. Tough. </p>
<p>I regret that bloggers at this site question our ethnicity, or racial views. </p>
<p>Its sad. Not only because Obama relies a great deal on his ability to silence debate on the issue, but also because it amounts to a calumny. </p>
<p>Thank you<br />
Jamal McCoy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/21/hype-lets-talk-about-hype/#comment-142541</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/21/hype-lets-talk-about-hype/#comment-142541</guid>
		<description>I know they hide their true campaign affiliation in the same manner they launder money, but, in a case like that, the republicans for Obama, who actually pays for it?

Is it possible for someone to set up a bank account in another's name, say, to channel money, with "plausible deniability?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know they hide their true campaign affiliation in the same manner they launder money, but, in a case like that, the republicans for Obama, who actually pays for it?</p>
<p>Is it possible for someone to set up a bank account in another&#8217;s name, say, to channel money, with &#8220;plausible deniability?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeakWoodKite</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/21/hype-lets-talk-about-hype/#comment-142535</link>
		<dc:creator>TeakWoodKite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/21/hype-lets-talk-about-hype/#comment-142535</guid>
		<description>Who is now in Texas...Can you say frog march?
Dollars to frogs on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is now in Texas&#8230;Can you say frog march?<br />
Dollars to frogs on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nellie</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/21/hype-lets-talk-about-hype/#comment-142519</link>
		<dc:creator>Nellie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/21/hype-lets-talk-about-hype/#comment-142519</guid>
		<description>Okay, I found the prgram I was referring to above. Oh, and I mis-spelled Nina Totenbergs last name - that's with One "T", not two - my bad.

Here is the summary of Nina's Report on&lt;strong&gt; All Things Considered&lt;/strong&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Federal Rules Beat State Laws in High Court Rulings &lt;/strong&gt;

In a major victory for the American business community Wednesday, the Supreme Court ruled in several cases &lt;strong&gt;that broad language in some federal statutes invalidates state tort laws and health and safety laws&lt;/strong&gt;, whether or not that was Congress' intended result.

Among the rulings is one determining that if a medical device is approved by the federal government, consumers may not sue the manufacturer under state statutes. 

Another ruling invalidates parts of Maine's law regulating the transportation of tobacco with the aim of keeping it away from minors.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The full report was 5 minutes and 9 sec - you can listen to it here:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=19211099</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I found the prgram I was referring to above. Oh, and I mis-spelled Nina Totenbergs last name - that&#8217;s with One &#8220;T&#8221;, not two - my bad.</p>
<p>Here is the summary of Nina&#8217;s Report on<strong> All Things Considered</strong>:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Federal Rules Beat State Laws in High Court Rulings </strong></p>
<p>In a major victory for the American business community Wednesday, the Supreme Court ruled in several cases <strong>that broad language in some federal statutes invalidates state tort laws and health and safety laws</strong>, whether or not that was Congress&#8217; intended result.</p>
<p>Among the rulings is one determining that if a medical device is approved by the federal government, consumers may not sue the manufacturer under state statutes. </p>
<p>Another ruling invalidates parts of Maine&#8217;s law regulating the transportation of tobacco with the aim of keeping it away from minors.</p></blockquote>
<p>The full report was 5 minutes and 9 sec - you can listen to it here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=19211099" rel="nofollow">http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=19211099</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/21/hype-lets-talk-about-hype/#comment-142517</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/21/hype-lets-talk-about-hype/#comment-142517</guid>
		<description>Check this out: Its on a site called Republicans for obama in texas
 
Create new accountRequest new password 
About Us
 Why Obama
 Blogs
 Forums
 State Chapters
  
Home » Groups » Texas R.F.O. Primary Petition for Obama
E-mail to send to all your Republican friends
Sat, 02/16/2008 - 10:41pm — afnighthawk 
Attention All Texas Republicans and Independents!!  

On March 4th, Texas Republicans and Independents will have an opportunity to end Hillary Clinton's (and Bill's) presidential ambitions once and for all!  

Since Texas has on open primary, Republicans and Independents should sign in at their polling place and request a Democratic ballot.  They should then vote for Barack Obama.  Even James Carville admits that if Hillary loses Texas, "she's done!"  Republicans can help make this a reality!!!  Just think, no more Clintons in the White House! 

Voting Democratic this one time will have NO effect on your ability to vote in the next Republican primary or obviously on your vote in November.  Since John McCain has the Republican nomination locked up, voting for McCain or Huckabee at this point will have no effect on the outcome on the Republican side. 

After you vote during early voting or on March 4th, you ARE NOT done!  Report back to your regular polling place at 7PM on March 4th to sign the Barack Obama list for caucus delegates.  In a little known Texas voting quirk, 67 delegates to the Democratic convention will be seated because of these caucuses.  This is a full one-third of the total number of Texas delegates.  For Hillary to lose, she has to lose the primary votes AND the caucus votes. I urge you to vote against Hillary Clinton by voting for Barack Obama. 

Please forward this e-mail to all your Republican and Independent friends so that we can help ensure the Clinton's defeat on March 4th!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check this out: Its on a site called Republicans for obama in texas</p>
<p>Create new accountRequest new password<br />
About Us<br />
 Why Obama<br />
 Blogs<br />
 Forums<br />
 State Chapters</p>
<p>Home » Groups » Texas R.F.O. Primary Petition for Obama<br />
E-mail to send to all your Republican friends<br />
Sat, 02/16/2008 - 10:41pm — afnighthawk<br />
Attention All Texas Republicans and Independents!!  </p>
<p>On March 4th, Texas Republicans and Independents will have an opportunity to end Hillary Clinton&#8217;s (and Bill&#8217;s) presidential ambitions once and for all!  </p>
<p>Since Texas has on open primary, Republicans and Independents should sign in at their polling place and request a Democratic ballot.  They should then vote for Barack Obama.  Even James Carville admits that if Hillary loses Texas, &#8220;she&#8217;s done!&#8221;  Republicans can help make this a reality!!!  Just think, no more Clintons in the White House! </p>
<p>Voting Democratic this one time will have NO effect on your ability to vote in the next Republican primary or obviously on your vote in November.  Since John McCain has the Republican nomination locked up, voting for McCain or Huckabee at this point will have no effect on the outcome on the Republican side. </p>
<p>After you vote during early voting or on March 4th, you ARE NOT done!  Report back to your regular polling place at 7PM on March 4th to sign the Barack Obama list for caucus delegates.  In a little known Texas voting quirk, 67 delegates to the Democratic convention will be seated because of these caucuses.  This is a full one-third of the total number of Texas delegates.  For Hillary to lose, she has to lose the primary votes AND the caucus votes. I urge you to vote against Hillary Clinton by voting for Barack Obama. </p>
<p>Please forward this e-mail to all your Republican and Independent friends so that we can help ensure the Clinton&#8217;s defeat on March 4th!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
