RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Writers Strike at DailyKos [Updated]

This is an open letter to the progressive blogosphere.  This is cross-posted and on the Recommended List at DailyKos.com. (Warning: There are 1,200 comments; this link takes you to the story-only version.)

UPDATE by SusanUnPC: Alegre’s strike has been picked up by Mark Ambinder of The Atlantic magazine; he is one of the top political bloggers out there. Sat. AM UPDATE: Picked up by Jake Tapper at ABC News, Taylor Marsh, Raw Story, and Tom Watson (a great blog to check out, and don’t miss his eloquent story on the strike, “The Left Splits: Writers Flee DailyKos Over Clinton-Bashing“).

I’ve been posting at DailyKos for nearly 4 years now and started writing diaries in support of Hillary Clinton back in June of last year.  Over the past few months I’ve noticed that things have become progressively more abusive toward my candidate and her supporters. I’ve put up with the abuse and anger because I’ve always believed in what our on-line community has tried to accomplish in this world.  No more. DailyKos is not the site it once was thanks to the abusive nature of certain members of our community.

I’ve decided to go on “strike” and will refrain from posting here as long as the administrators allow the more disruptive members of our community to trash Hillary Clinton and distort her record without any fear of consequence or retribution.  I will not be posting at DailyKos effective immediately.  I will not help drive up traffic or page-hits as long as my candidate - a good and fine DEMOCRAT - is attacked in such a horrid and sexist manner not only by other diarists, but by several of those posting to the front page.

Instead, I will put my energy into posting at sites where my efforts aren’t routinely trashed, spammed and ridiculed by a handful of angry, petty and spiteful folks who clearly have too much time on their hands.  

This is a strike - a walkout over unfair writing conditions at DailyKos. It does not mean that if conditions get better I won’t “work” at DailyKos again.  As a regular contributor to the discourse in our community, I would certainly hope to take part in the conversation at DailyKos again some day if we ever get to the point where we’re engaging each other in discussion rather than facing off in shouting matches. But not now. Writers need a safe place to reach out and exchange ideas, to communicate and challenge one another. DailyKos should be that place, but its tone, its essence has evolved into something ugly and destructive. Good writers can’t survive in that kind of atmosphere.  Democrats shouldn’t have to put up with that from fellow Democrats.

Sadly, the majority of the administrators have allowed this hostile environment to develop in our online community for anyone who isn’t planted firmly in the Obama camp.  They’ve routinely ignored personal attacks and allowed disruptive, spam-like posts to go unchecked whenever anyone expresses support for Hillary or challenges something their candidate has said or done.  There are however several front-pagers who have managed to avoid taking part in the attacks on Hillary and for that I’m grateful.  But the site has grown to the point where they simply can’t - or won’t monitor it.  

As a result, our community has become little more than an echo chamber with an attitude that harkens back to the early days of Dubbya’s administration - yer either with us or yer a’gin us, heh!  The attackers and disrupters are no better than Chris Matthews with their sexism, hate, lies, and obsession with bashing - all - things - Hillary.

No, I won’t post specific attacks here. That would just be repeating the lies and the hate, but I will note that one of my fellow Kossaks (someone with whom I thought I could agree to disagree) went so far as to suggest that others try to dig up real life information on the pro-Hillary members of our community.  To what end?  Was his aim to find enough information on us to try to get us fired from our jobs and leave our families homeless - or worse?  Suggesting that they dig up real life information on us is the lowest form of intimidation and goes way beyond the limits of all things civil and reasonable.  It’s nothing more than the worst form of thuggish, hateful and intimidating behavior toward other members of our community.  

Now in all fairness, that diarist saw just how far over the line he went with that post and eventually took it down.  But the fact that he posted it in the first place shows us the kind of mob mentality that has been allowed to develop, grow and fester at DailyKos.

Either way, is that the kind of behavior that Obama would be proud of?  Do the venomous attacks and lies about fellow Democrats represent him and all he stands for in an accurate and fair manner?  Does this spiteful and vindictive behavior reunite our party?  Would outing this working mother represent hope?  Would it bring about change?  Would Obama encourage that sort of anger, bullying, intimidation and hate from his followers toward another Democrat and her supporters?  Do those followers of his help his cause at the end of the day?

I have been working for decades to get countless good Democrats elected - going back to the early `70s when I stuffed envelopes and walked precincts for George McGovern (ok so I was 10 back then but I still helped and gladly - Nixon sent several of my uncles to Vietnam).  The causes I’ve worked for are those which Obama’s followers at DailyKos claim to care about.  As a Yellow-Dog-Democrat and a progressive, I am deeply saddened to see what’s happened to our community.  

I’ve also been a posting to discussion boards and blogs since the mid-90s, and have worked for and written about a wide range of causes from: women’s rights; the environment; an end to the genocide in Darfur; benefits and decent equipment for our troops; an end to domestic violence; the protection of children; education; strengthening our economy; healthcare; impeachment; alleviating poverty; peace… the list goes on and on and on.  Many of those diaries have generated hundreds and hundreds of comments - several having topped the thousand comments mark (take THAT Keith Olbermann!).

But let me make one thing crystal clear here - this is not a GBCW post. If and when the community I once respected and of which I considered myself a valued member returns to its roots and stops attacking and maligning Hillary and other good Democrats in such a hateful and destructive manner, I’ll be happy to return as an active member of what used to be the online community of progressive activists.  It is my hope that the day will come sooner rather than later.

Until that day, I’ll participate in other sites such as MyDD & Talk Left etc., and focus my energy on building them up to help fill the void that DailyKos has left in the progressive blogosphere.

Until then, I’ll take up the WGA strike motto: “We write. You wrong.” when it comes to DailyKos, and say the following to anyone reading this diary right now…

If you’re sick of the way Hillary - a good and decent Democrat - has been vilified and attacked… if you’ve EVER recommended one of my dairies on this or any other site then please join me in this effort.  Let’s take a stand here and now and tell the world we will no longer remain silent in the face of the sexism, anger, irrational hate, lies and attacks against Hillary.  Nor will we add to the bottom line of a site that continues to lead the charge in fueling it.

The double standards, the distortions, the hateful, irrational, personal attacks, and the lies about Hillary and her long and distinguished record of public service stop here - and they stop now.

So I hereby announce the formation of a new labor union - The American Federation of Concerned Bloggers (AFCB).  

This is a writer’s strike - who’ll join me on the picket line?

By the way…

Are you current on your union dues?

Pony-up folks.

U P D A T E

Here’s that video I tried to post in the comments. I wasn’t going to post it in the body of the diary but what the heck - we’re all friends here right? :) I really am going to miss posting at DailyKos. The fact that I made it up onto the Rec List over there tonight gives me hope that we can come together again as a community when the time comes to take out John McCain in the general election.

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post165 Comments »

Comment by S. Markom | 2008-03-14 21:59:16

I found precisely the same thing with one me,ber trolling me with every question I have about Obama and even stating that they don’t want Hillary supporters in Daily Kos.

Not all, but some of these people need help. More importantly who’s in charge?

With Obama going down like the Titanic at this point what will these crazies do after they’ve lost Edwards and now lose Obama?

Comment by Nick | 2008-03-15 16:00:00

It’s tough to think of two states more different than Wyoming and Mississippi.

But we won Wyoming on Saturday, and we won Mississippi by a large margin.

Between those two states, we picked up enough delegates to erase the gains by Senator Clinton last Tuesday and add to our substantial lead in earned delegates. And in doing so we showed the strength and breadth of this movement.

But just turn on the news and you’ll see that Senator Clinton continues to run an expensive, negative campaign against us. Each day her campaign launches a new set of desperate attacks.

They’re not just attacking me; they’re attacking you.

Over the weekend, an aide to Senator Clinton attempted to diminish the overwhelming number of contests we’ve won by referring to places we’ve prevailed as “boutique” states and our supporters as the “latte-sipping crowd.”

I’m not sure how those terms apply to Mississippi and Wyoming — or Virginia, Iowa, Louisiana, or Idaho for that matter.

I know that our victories in all of these states demonstrate a rejection of this kind of petty, divisive campaigning.

But the fact remains that Senator Clinton’s campaign will continue to attack us using the same old Washington playbook. And now that John McCain is the Republican nominee, we are forced to campaign on two fronts.

Comment by Bently | 2008-03-16 04:11:38

Why are you so upset that Hillary is criticizing Obama when he is doing the same thing to her? That is politics, but you don’t seem to get it. Besides that, their criticisms of each other are fairly mild and on the issues. It’s supporters, like you, who get all bent out of shape and ratchet up the rhetoric.

And what is with the continued harping on Geraldine Ferraro? She took the hit and stepped down. Hillary clearly said she didn’t agree with or support what Ferraro said. What don’t you get about that? Are you equally upset about what Rev. Wright, who is arguably closer to Obama than Ferraro to Clinton, said about Hillary? Perhaps you haven’t heard it? If you haven’t, it is much, much worse, I promise you.

Winning Wyoming and Mississippi is great for the Obama campaign, except that those states will be nearly unwinnable by the Democratic candidate in November. How many people exactly voted in those caucuses? And how many people voted in those states in 2000 and 2004 for which candidates? Do the math. Obama supporters think they are running just against Hillary. Better keep your eyes on the real prize or be saying ‘President McCain’ next January.

 
 

Comment by RobertS | 2008-03-15 16:07:51

calling Obama and Edwards supporters “crazies” while you cry about how uncivilized other posters are to Clinton supporters.
You should understand the Obama supporters are frustrated because Clinton has effectively lost the nomination and is now trying to steal it by way of super-delegate. And at a time when we should all be coming together and backing Obama. That is why are so uncivilized to you. We already had one election stolen in 2000, don’t want to see it happen in the dem primaries.

Comment by Smilin' Jim | 2008-03-15 16:46:58

Cya at the credentials committee this August.

Welcome to Stalingrad, Obama Worshiper.

Comment by RobertS | 2008-03-15 18:38:07

there we go again - more name-calling by the Clinton crowd - it is just SO ironic…

 
 
 
 

Comment by Mary Jo Kopechne | 2008-03-14 22:00:17

I admire your courage and principles and support your strike. Sexism permeates every act, speech and innuendo of this primary season, and it’s allowed. There’s lots of liberal white guilt that causes people to cave-in when accused of racism, but sexism and misogyny–focused like a laser beam on Hillary Clinton–goes unnoticed and unchallenged.

Welcome to No Quarter. They don’t kiss up to bullsh*t around here.

 

Comment by helga | 2008-03-14 22:01:47

I agree with everything you said. When posters at DailyKos and other blogs started sounding like Freepers I quit reading. It is a sad commentary when we liberals can not have a calm discussion regardless of who anyone supports. The keepers of these blogs should put a stop to the nasty comments.

 

Comment by Strawberrybitch | 2008-03-14 22:06:10

I stopped reading Kos a few weeks ago even before I decided on who I was voting for. I made an innocent remark about the use of Shillary or Billary bringing down the level of discourse and I was jumped on, vebally assaulted and called a racist Obama hater. Huffington Post and now even my beloved Crooks and Liars seems to have followed suit. I really love Larry but to tell you the truth you guys are a little outta’ my league as far as commenting goes, so I mostly lurk. Why does that make me feel like such a dirty girl?

Comment by Hype-Jersey | 2008-03-14 23:46:09

I used to love Crooks and Liars the absolute best. But they have gone he way of the Obama-pods too. I don’t even visit there anymore. Their traffic probably followed the same kind of trajectory that Obama’s will. They peaked in traffic probably a month or so ago and it’s nothing but down for them now. They deserve it.

Comment by kenoshaMarge | 2008-03-15 08:05:43

It’s really very sad that so many of the “progressive” blogs have become as bad or worse than the rightwing thugs. They have become what they once pretended to abhor.

I don’t like Obama but I cannot imagine saying the things about him I have read from other so-called liberals about Hillary.

I miss going to Crooks & Liars but they are becoming exactly what the title of their blog says.

Ditto TPM, BuzzFlash, and most of the commenters on many other blogs. None are on my favorites list any longer.

Being pro-Obama is fine, no one objects to anyone supporting their candidate, but vile, vitriolic screeds against Hillary Clinton that are exactly like the kind of things the Republicans have been doing for decades.

Given all the things that have been said, I doubt if this Humphty Dumpthy can ever be put back together again. No doubt the Republicans are laughing their asses off.

 

Comment by Adzam | 2008-03-15 11:05:25

“Peaked” the live commentary traffic during the debates has been fantastic. If you have any data to show the decline in traffic then please share. Additionally, if you would please describe Senator Obama’s supposed decline in rational and logical terms. These two statements, while telling a nice “story” is a complete fabrication without data. This is precisely the same thing you are accusing the DKos posters of doing. The only difference is that you use “nicer” language.

Your statement clearly belies your political leanings and is typical of the type of spin your candidate is employing.

 
 

Comment by Kathleen | 2008-03-15 09:43:54

These are similar to the attacks I was subjected to at Jane Hamsher’s website at Firedoglake when the Israeli Palestinian conflict would be brought up and its effect on everything that is taking place in the middle east.

Lots of folks (even the moderator) would attack and hassle. Serious pile ons when this issue comes up.

 
 

Comment by A.Citizen | 2008-03-14 22:08:15

Not that GOS and the slimers over there will miss me but I also will strike. No more comments…no linking to blogswarm action, FDL is the leader in that anyway, no fraternization with the feces-flinging monkeys of CheetoLand.

I feel for the few remaining people of integrity and grit: mcjoan, scout finch, jotter, Kargo X and the irreplaceable Meteor Blades.

Hopefully when the election is over, no this won’t end with the primary, the community will look around and realize that the actions of a few A-Listers such as Kos…Bowers…Marshall have revealed an appalling lack of judgment in regards to what they’ve allowed and indeed actually done to cause the factionalization of the ’sphere all in the name of two candidates who can not by any stretch of the imagination be considered progressive.

I am on strike until those responsible for the ascension of RedState political behaviour in the progressive blogosphere publicaly apologize and, further, relinquish their self-assumed power in our community.

Clearly they do not deserve it.

 

Comment by Alegre | 2008-03-14 22:09:12

So what do you guys think? You in on this strike of ours?

Comment by AF | 2008-03-14 22:23:52

Alegre the original diary busted the comment max. Are you going to start an overflow diary or, add people to your list of strikers in the original?

 

Comment by MarkL | 2008-03-14 22:24:42

I wrote my “Goodbye Orange Republic” diary a couple of weeks ago, Alegre.
[I'm BoringDem there]. I believe that Kos has made it impossible for him or DK to effectively support Hillary if she is the nominee.
Since I favor Hillary—in fact, I think her chances are excellent—I won’t participate there any more.
I am beginning to think that there will be no amicable resolution to the primary difficulties, unless Obama’s current problems (with Wright and Rezko) prove his undoing. One of them is going to crash and burn.
Clearly Obama wants not just to defeat Hillary but to humiliate her. I doubt he will get his desire.

Comment by Sima | 2008-03-15 01:05:04

Wow!

I gave up DK before I could tell you this, but I wanted to thank you, Mark, BoringDem. A while back you wrote a diary on DK about Hillary. I don’t remember the thrust of it, maybe about really looking at what she’s done. And it got me, an Edwards supporter, to look. I put aside my dislike of Bill (for Nafta, not the BJ, I could care less about the BJ) and looked at Hillary herself.

I really liked what I saw. When John dropped out, I moved to Hillary. I did not expect that to happen, but it did. She’s competent and has the expertize we need. Now I’m a delegate in the WA state caucuses for Hillary. Thanks. For arguing lucidly and not putting me down and opening up a new way of thinking for me.

 
 

Comment by miriam | 2008-03-14 23:41:17

Alegre, some of us have got your back over at The Atlantic. Word must have gotten out as some of the rabid kossacks are there. So much for “changing the political conversation” and “unity.” Obama’s candidacy has divided the Democratic party so throughly it may well cause us to lose the election come November. WHAT is Obama’s appeal?

 

Comment by Nellie | 2008-03-15 04:52:00

Absolutely in.

Thank you for such a well stated and rational post. Elton John at the end was Great.

 

Comment by Psychodrew | 2008-03-15 10:09:21

I’ve said it before and I will say it again. Alegre, Hillary is lucky to have you on her side! Your hard work and dedication has inspired me to work harder!

Andrew

 

Comment by bama_barrron | 2008-03-15 19:04:52

alerge … although i was never a diarist i was a member of the dkos community from almost day one. i went on strike two months ago after i got so tired of being called a racist and a sore (i supported edwards) loser. the straw that broke the camel’s back? i posted a comment urging moderation and had 17 people calling me names for not supporting obama in the manner they thought was necessary.

yes, i support your strike … it goes without saying!

 

Comment by RickWn | 2008-03-16 00:00:11

Recommended!

(Hey, Larry… you’re blog moved above DKos on my bookmark list this week… way to go!! :-)

 
 

Comment by MarkL | 2008-03-14 22:17:23

I would disagree on one point: given that BO’s MO is the political of personal destruction, I am sure he is delighted that his supporters want to dig into people’s personal lives.
Didn’t Ferraro say that her current boss had been called by someone from the Obama campaign urging him to fire her?

 

Comment by grtphoto | 2008-03-14 22:22:11

I don’t read DK - I totally support your efforts. Good for you. Larry and Susan are very organized and receptive. I think you will enjoy the discourse on this blog.

 

Comment by Lorelynn | 2008-03-14 22:22:42

They suspended my posting and rating privileges in early December. Autoban didn’t kick in because nothing I said was out of line. So, they whined to Hunter, and Hunter apparently suspended me. Now, Kos still wants to claim, for advertising purposes, X number registered users, so he doesn’t want to ban us flat out.

it’s funny - I never posted a negative diary on any candidate. To this day, if someone dares post a diary critical of Obama, someone will suspect it’s me. I’ve been gone 3 months and they are apparently still wounded by and talking about my commentary. The other day I was accused of being Lanny Davis. LOL

If Kos was as smart as he thinks he is, he would have called a halt to the endless stream of “don’t run Hillary” diaries that began infesting the place about a year and a half before she announced her candidacy. There was never anything to them but misogyny and that should be an inexcusable reason for a Democrat to object to a candidate. But by not stopping those diaries, as he stopped the 9/11 conspiracy diaries (a move I agree with), he gave tacit permission to the misogyny. Once she announced, it became overwhelming pretty quickly. Ten or twelve anti-Hillary diaries a day.

I never got why it was okay to lie about Clinton’s voting record but no one elses. For all the squawking about Clinton’s AUMF vote, you didn’t hear a peep about Dodd or Biden’s. Clinton superb record on judicial appointments was never acknowledged. Dengre was allowed to post fictional news paper accounts claiming that Clinton received money from sweatshops for her presidential campaign - a talking point he took directly from Byron York. Never mind that within a few weeks of the Tan donation to her senatorial campaign, she voted for the minimum wage bill that the Tans were opposed to. Never mind that the Clinton administration was as aggressive as they could be on sweatshop violations in the Marianas. Never mind any of those things. Dengre was allowed to pretend that there was something genuinely wrong in that donation. I called him on it and got TRd to a fare-thee-well.

Good riddance to bad rubbish. To avoid electing a woman, they’ve aligned themselves with old fashioned snake oil salesman whose campaign, as of tonight, is probably over. I bet Kos is gonna have a terrible hangover in a few days.

Comment by MarkL | 2008-03-14 22:26:00

Lorelynn, I have referred to the bad news coming out about Obama as “lorelynn’s revenge” both at Orange Republic and Mydd.

 

Comment by Five Thirty | 2008-03-14 23:03:16

Lorelynn: I never thought it was misogyny at DKos but rather an anti-DLC ideology. Markos Moulitsas wants to crash the (DLC) gates and he has opportunistically decided to consider the Clinton campaign as representative of the DLC.

Comment by dkmich | 2008-03-15 08:11:08

I, too, would love to see the DLC die a death of a thousand cuts; but… I do not want my community members or my fellow Democrats burnt at the stake to do it. One can take a position, stick to it and defend it without resorting to frat house insults, pie fights, and gang trolling. I have no dog in this fight. The voting records show that there isn’t much difference between Obama and Hillary. They are, in fact, consumate insiders who have done little while in DC to oppose trade or stop funding the war. Having said that, we all know that almost anybody is better than McBush.

 
 
 

Comment by jojo | 2008-03-14 22:25:34

I went to the KOS website for a short period of time a couple years ago. Navigating through the multitudes was an exercise in futility in my mind and I deleted the bookmark and never looked back. The same problem with Huffingtonpost in my mind. I know some folks try to cross post in order to get their point of view seen by as many people as possible, but there is a point of diminishing returns to this exercise.

 

Comment by John Cas | 2008-03-14 22:27:28

Alegre is logical, forceful, and respectful of others even while disagreeing with their ill-advised tactics. I fully support Alegre and the Writers strike. Too bad, not all bloggers at DailyKos are not as intelligent and noble as Alegre.

 

Comment by A.Citizen | 2008-03-14 22:30:37

If he doesn’t he can drop by my house and I’ll whap him in the head a few times…metaphorically speaking.

Here’s what Kos…Bowers…Marshall can’t stand:

Progressive Punch ‘Chips are Down’ ratings:

Obama ranks 41st in the Senate

Clinton 24th….

These Senators are ranked more progressive than Obama:

Webb, Feinstein and Ben Nelson.

Now I was trained a physicist not a half-baked journalist like GOS so to me independent well researched metrics about any situation are good things.

I stopped believing in the magic in 1968 the same year I refused the draft.

So….

These make-believe revolutionaries ?

I’ve shit ‘em.

On to ‘More and Better Progressive Bloggers’. When the ones you got are selling out to Goldman Sachs, ‘Empty Suit’ candidate….

Time to get new ones.

 

Comment by myiq2xu | 2008-03-14 22:34:45

I was a regular visitor to GOS but rarely a commenter. It was even one of my start pages. But the HillaryHate got so bad I stopped visiting completely.

I may never go back.

 

Comment by Ellis | 2008-03-14 22:35:29

I have been amazed at the vitriol that has been directed at both Clintons, but until now no one has acknowledged the double standard that exists between the treatment of Hillary and Barack. Because of the mob behavior they demonstrate I have wondered if many of these attackers in fact were nominal Republicans until it became uncool to support Republicans and the Bush administration. Their words and conduct are so excessive that I have trouble believing that they truly understand the tolerance and respect for others that underlie liberal democratic values. I’ll join this strike.

S. Markom - I’m intrigued why you believe Obama is going down like the Titanic. Any details?

 

Comment by Myke | 2008-03-14 22:47:59

I have stayed away from KOZ. I get attacked in too many other places. I am dumbfounded how many people threw Whitewater at me today alone,lol. They must have run out of weed finally but are still right where they were 15 years ago. I leave hateful posts on my blog because I think nothing serves my opinions more than ignorant digression from the truth. I read NO Quarter without fail and reference you on my Vox account. It’s only a small pre-registered blogging site but it has good readership, friendly posters who may even disagree. But it has decorum. It also has co-Voxers who will come to your aid rather than leave you hanging in the wind when you do get attacked. Keep up the good work. These Junior Boomers drive me nuts. Their mouth are as large as their opinions but their fact checking and reason seem to be lacking.

Comment by kenoshaMarge | 2008-03-15 08:15:51

Often in error, seldom in doubt? :)

 
 

Comment by ces | 2008-03-14 22:50:49

–First, I deleted the bookmark of the OrangeGoo site because people couldn’t talk in any positive way about Palestine. (I’m not a big IP ‘devote’ but the censorship bothered me)

–Then it was Booman because he wouldn’t ever again support Gore, because of how Gore wouldn’t play nice after the election. That, and a post awhile back where an Intel (?) ad was being called racist because it had some nerdy white guy was standing in a cubicle area with six black sprinters in the ’set’ position. The regulars were trying to say the ’set’ position was them bowing down?! The hysteria didn’t cease even after I found a track coaches website with images of the proper starting position for sprints. And I asked them if they’d believe the computer were fast if they had a bunch of white guys in spandex? [crickets] I hate double standards.

–Then recently it’s been Puffinton and Josh (dammit, why?!).

–Even Rawstory. And MLW…I’ll still occasionally lurk there because they are usually all over the place, but something just doesn’t feel right….the sense of ‘i must live the quilt of other peoples’ forefathers’ sins’ kinda stinks the place up. BUT, I credit MSOC for generally not deleting posts or banning people just because they don’t agree. That IS something.

–Lastly, and it sickens me because I really want to keep reading/watchin’…..Crooks and any Liar but Obama. I left a comment on there about patterns and asked John to just fess up and endorse BO already. Logan comes back that ‘for the millionth time they haven’t endorsed anybody’. Yeah, but the Clinton bashing continued and finally they just ‘had’ to put up the Ferraro clips. Ms. Belle’s posts were the most suspect. Maybe next year…

–We don’t feel the need to pay for our commercials, so we don’t have cable, so I can’t not watch KO anymore. Well, ok, so I’ve downloaded from C&aLbO most of his special blowups when they were on duh’b'ya, but well, see above. But, I did ‘recycle’ his book to a half-price bookstore yesterday. That and a couple Clancy softbacks got me $5. Felt pretty good.

–But on the flip side, Taylor Marsh rocks. And Larry and Susan. Despite his most assuredly busy schedule he’s actually responded to a couple emails I’ve sent him. The stark sincerity I’ve felt here is awesome.

——————————–
There’s no ‘I’ in Hope.

Comment by ces | 2008-03-14 22:53:21

guilt. [grr]

 
 

Comment by Comrade Rutherford | 2008-03-14 22:52:55

Wow, welcome to the party. I stopped even reading anything at Kos last summer!

I only go there now on an occasional link from someone else.

My feelings about the Presidential race is that both Obama and Clinton are right-of-center Republicans, given their record and stated position on current affairs.

I wanted to vote for a Democrat this election, but the media hounded them all out. So our choices are McBush; former College Republican and board member of that bastion of progressivism -WalMart; or the New Guy who has promised to NOT curb the immoral mecrenary armies of private corporations (among other things Bush has done that he’s promised not to change).

So no Democrats are in the race… Too bad for all of us. At least I did get to vote for my guy in the primary for my state!

Comment by MarkL | 2008-03-14 22:55:19

I disagree that Hillary is a Republican. I do think Obama is a classic liberal Republican—harking back to the famous LR’s of 40-50 years ago.
For me the litmus tests that make Hillary a Democrat are her staunch defense of SS, and her position on UHC. Obama fails in both of those areas to me.

 

Comment by rwc | 2008-03-14 23:50:52

I used to post there when Gilliard was just another user and several things always tended to stand out:
1) Dkos is a watering hole for yuppies and dinks, replete with their perceptions and fears. Basically young Republicans in drag.
2)They never really tolerated any real dissent from the party line. Put it this way Kos’s “Crashing the Gates” was a marketing ploy to generate cash. He was never a reformer, just another cheer leading party hack.

 
 

Comment by MarkL | 2008-03-14 22:52:59

I think the fundamental reason this campaign is turning so ugly is that Obama has almost nothing to run on—-
He’s not experienced enough. He tried to hoodwink and bamboozle the voters to drive the competition out early; once that failed, he was out of substance, so the campaign had to turn ugly, using race, lies, Whitewater, the Clenis.
A couple of months ago I felt mildly positive about Obama. Now? Fuck no.
One final turning point for me was discovering that his vaunted list of successes in IL came from a set of bills that was handed to him in his last year to build his resume for the Senate run.
And then he won’t even do his job in the Senate.
He’s a prima donna—a carbon copy of Bush.

 

Comment by douglasbot | 2008-03-14 22:55:48

Never read Daily Kos, never will. Not because of recent events which sound ridiculous…but because i’ve always felt it’s a clique. If you’re not on the inside you never will be. A shame. The site is considered a powerful voice in politics.

Democrats…liberals…like herding cats.

 

Comment by Reich Winger's NightMare | 2008-03-14 23:03:02

Oh boo hoo. Kos hates us so we’re going to boycott his site. Sheesh.

From the outside looking in, Hillary seems to be little more than Bush with tits. I don’t think she has an original thought in her body, she just repeats what she’s been told to say. Yeah… four more years of white skinned elitist crap. No thanks.

Comment by MarkL | 2008-03-14 23:04:17

So.. vote for Obama because Hillary is a racist.
And you say HILLARY is not original.
ROFLMAO.

 

Comment by Strawberrybitch | 2008-03-14 23:31:43

Case in point. Typical Obama supporter/woman hater. You can’t be a liberal and use those kind of words.

 

Comment by Cornfed | 2008-03-14 23:46:20

Ah, dammit! If he’d just included “America” spelled with a K in his little screed I would have made Trustafarian Hillery Hater Bingo.

Hmmmm, looks like “Billery” or some variation of “Your all loosers and so is Hitlery” (with or without the SPs) would have done it too.

Try harder little bongwater drinker! I’m counting on you.

 

Comment by Cujo359 | 2008-03-14 23:49:10

Yeah… four more years of white skinned elitist crap.

This is the language of bigots. If that’s how you choose political candidates then you deserve the government you now have.

 

Comment by Myke | 2008-03-15 08:00:49

You could have used the pun that she is Bush with a Bush instead of with tits (what a sexise remark) But that’s okay. White skinned also? Jesus you’re a woman hater and a racist. Hard to tell who you are for. Make another pitcher of Kool aid and spread the good word about Obama. He needs another friend like you. That’s what will keep him out of the White House. Not that I’m complaining. He should never be there to begin with.

 

Comment by kenoshaMarge | 2008-03-15 08:29:32

You just made her point for her pinhead.

 

Comment by Smilin' Jim | 2008-03-15 11:44:15

How very troll…..

 
 

Comment by cassie | 2008-03-14 23:04:06

I came to Hillary late in the game, having supported Edwards, but when I sought information about Obama v Hillary I was astonished as the vitrol and Clinton Derangement Syndrome was everywhere. Not just on Kos, who has his own special place in hell, but on TPM and DU as well. I was an avid supporter of all but, right now, I could not tell you the last time I clicked on any of the three. I will not let my clicks contribute one penny to any of them! They’ve drunk the Kool-Aide and it is a bitter tasting one at that! Did I hear 527 anyone?

I haven’t decided what I will do if Obama is the nominee. I’ve never not voted and would do almost anything to ensure McCain’s defeat but I am having great difficulty.

I’m sick of the misogynist remarks. I’m sick of emails and letters to MSNBC with no change. It disheartens me that the pledge of “unity” is so misused. Either candidate is going to need each and every vote in November to put him/her over the top of McCain and the swiftboating has hardly started - from that side of the aisle anyway.

I’m tired of the race baiting. The wink wink, nod nod and the dog whistles. I hoped for change, remember those sunny days when we had three great choices - or the choices were unclear because we had great candidates - but when I saw it was not going to be possible with Obama and his campaign and that each accusation he tossed out, was not allowed to be answered, I’ve given up!

Maybe time will change things. I just hope that I live to see that day a woman can walk into the WH as President. I think it will be a very long time before that happens if it doesn’t happen now. My mother was born before women were allowed to vote. I knew she would have been so proud to see a viable woman as a candidate, nominee and President. I wished she hadn’t died last year so she could witness history. Now, I’m glad that she didn’t live to see what this campaign has become.

And I didn’t think we could go much lower than Dubya.

 

Comment by Susanclare | 2008-03-14 23:25:24

Alegre, thank you. It is about time someone stood up to some aspect of the media. I wish we could get you on the MSM - as a special guest on Hardball, for example….you, rock and I am with you totally…susanclare

 

Comment by miriam | 2008-03-14 23:32:41

I’ve been part of the Daily Kos community almost since its inception. It is no longer the diversely rich, tolerant community it once was. The atmosphere has become toxic for all but the most virulent Obama supporters. Sexism is rampant, expletives serve as discussion points, and the hatred directed at Hillary Clinton and her supporters is untenable. If this an example of the “Unity” that Barack Obama inspires, the country is in for an even more rude awakening than we have experienced in the past 24 Jeremiah-Wright-filled hours.

Comment by RickWn | 2008-03-15 22:41:42

I have also recently decided to move away from DKos for awhile for the very same reasons you describe. Who knows? It’s Kos’s property. He can change it as he wishes, but his website’s tone certainly has changed this election cycle from what it was when I signed up there before Bush won the Electoral College.

I can understand a desperation to have a Democrat win, but I don’t understand the thinking behind the website’s owner (who has bragged for so many years about his “progressive” credentials) choosing to slam one primary candidate over another to such and extent, when both of them admit they are 95% percent in agreement of the issues.

Darndest thing, too, about the Kos love-fest with Obama is that if Obama is “new”, he is only 5% new… not exactly the FDR, JFK, or “walks on water” candidate so many there would have one now believe.

 
 

Comment by Hype-Jersey | 2008-03-14 23:33:23

I have to wonder what took so long for this to happen. I am surprised that you did not leave sooner. I am surprised that others aren’t racing to follow you. What do you think happened to all the readers who found ourselves treated to Hill-bashing every day at KOS and other blogs? Did you think we were hypnotized by the Obama-pod people? Or that we curled up and died? No - we left too. We came in droves to fair-minded blogs like this one. We’ve been quietly carving out a niche for ourselves - just like the first blog-readers of yesteryear… We’re here and we want to read what you have to say. Welcome.

 

Comment by Cujo359 | 2008-03-14 23:45:04

DKos has never been on my “must see” list. It’s always been too big and difficult to navigate. It also seemed to have a good many idiotic commenters.

Nevertheless, it’s sad to see an important blog lose so many good participants because of the incivility and blackballing that’s been going on over there.

This Presidential race ought to be a cause for optimism and hope - all of a sudden it looks like a woman or a black person can be a serious candidate for President. Even if you’re a white man that ought to be good news - the potential talent pool is more than double what it used to be. Yet so much of the discourse has been specious charges of racism and sexism that I’m getting to the point where I don’t want to hear about it any more.

Anyway, Alegre, good for you and the others for taking a stand about this.

 

Comment by miriam | 2008-03-14 23:50:07

Hype-Jersey: You ask what took so long. Mostly it was a sense that some of us should stay simply to act as balance and to counter the most untruthful of the attacks on Clinton. At least that was my motive. But there comes a time when you realize that minds are so closed that they can’t be forced open even with reason and civility. And last week, when Markos himself joined the Hate-Hillary brigade, I saw that kos as it once was could not be resurrected.

Comment by A.Citizen | 2008-03-14 23:56:27

R.I.P.

And Kos when you read this know that we don’t relish this outcome.

Look in the damn mirror podjo.

 
 

Comment by dave | 2008-03-15 00:10:57

I thought I was alone in thinking Markos has gone off the deep end. His blog was supposed to be this community where people could come and support Democrats. Here is what he said when Jake Tapper asked if he endorsed candidates.

“MOULITSAS: We support every Democrat that runs for office. Now, some of them we focus on a lot more and talk about more. You know, we adopt certain races. It’s not an endorsement. It’s a blog of people who are committed to the Democratic Party. So this notion of endorsement, I think, is kind of silly, and it’s an artifact of traditional media where you have to say, ‘I endorse this candidate.’ Well, we technically endorse every single Democrat in the general election. ”

No he still hasn’t endorsed, but what he’s doing now is actually more destructive to his goal. He’s running post after post of anti-Clinton hype, combined with no criticism of Obama. You just cannot do this to liberal regular blog readers. They are too sophisticated to not know when somebody is trying to “sell” them something. It just goes against their nature to be swayed by one-sided commentary. And the thing is, I’ve never seen him address this issue? Surely, some other bloggers have passed along this concern?

Comment by MarkL | 2008-03-15 00:21:38

Well, I have to wonder what financial incentive he has to back Obama.

Comment by alexei | 2008-03-15 00:27:36

I almost posted that over at MyDD. I do wonder about Markos and the other so-called “A” list bloggers.

 
 

Comment by MarkL | 2008-03-15 00:21:54

Well, I have to wonder what financial or career incentive he has to back Obama.

 

Comment by RickWn | 2008-03-16 00:42:20

Recommended, dave!

Gave it a four. :-)

 
 

Comment by Dee | 2008-03-15 00:11:44

I, too, read DailyKos almost from its inception. And I, too, have ‘gone on strike’ since the primary elections started. Somewhere along the way DailyKos seemed to decide to become ‘kingmaker’ because they seem to think ‘what’s best for us’. New politics it ain’t.

 

Comment by hibob | 2008-03-15 01:16:20

If you’ve read Alegre’s diary, you owe it to yourself to read Jeff Lieber’s and DHinMI’s diaries explaining the differences between an online pity party and a strike.

I think Jeff sums it up pretty well:

go out and picket and walk a line for a bunch of months and don’t have any money coming in and spend nights trying to figure out if and when you’ll ever work again and if your friends will ever work again and receive crying phone calls from crew members who have to sell their house and leave the business because they didn’t have savings to cover their asses when things got really bad and have screaming fights with people who you’ve know all your life about whether or not what your UNION is doing is good for the industry or bad for the industry and have neighbors in a panic because their health insurance is about to go away because they haven’t made the yearly minimum and take a hundred phone calls from your family asking again and again whether or not you’re going to be alright and hold fundraisers for people you don’t even know and lobby congress and Wall Street and any one who will listen that the companies you are fighting are REALLY monopolies willing to crush workers rights for profit and try every day just not to go insane from the sheer boredom of waiting for your life to restart.

That’s a WRITER’S STRIKE.

Comment by MarkL | 2008-03-15 01:27:01

hibob,
Jeff seems to be denigrating everyone who writes at DK. You know, SOME people put a lot of work into their writing, even at blogs. Maybe not Kos and the other Obamanauts.. but I know some who do.

 

Comment by Scotch | 2008-03-15 09:47:23

That is just a bunch of whining used to once again deny what is going on at DailyKos. It gives them a chance to avoid the real issue.,

Many of us have been on strike and walked a pickett line. A person has to be really wrapped up in themselves and have their head up their ass to take personal offense at the use of the word in a variety of other ways. It is just more of the mentality that sees racism in every word someone utters. They see it because they want to and it is ammunition to use against the people who are pointing out the elephant in the room , not because it’s there.

 
 

Comment by wahh | 2008-03-15 01:33:36

wahhh sexism wahhh misogyny

there are more reasons to dislike someone than their genitalia, people.

Comment by Cujo359 | 2008-03-15 01:43:35

I dislike your shallowness. The arrangement of your genitalia has nothing to do with that.

Comment by Smilin' Jim | 2008-03-15 11:46:45

Psssst……
Do not feed the trolls

 
 
 

Comment by Ridiculous! | 2008-03-15 01:36:56

You know I read where Paul Krugman complained about the same thing with Obama supporters mean-spiritedness. And probably there are some that sense blood and the possibility of his winning the election. Some people dearly want to see him elected for purely racial reasons, which is NOT the right reason. If he does win the nomination let’s hope it’s because he’s the better of the two Democratic candidates, NOT because he’s black.

THAT SAID, I STRONGLY suspect that A LOT of the admittedly childish infighting going on between Obama and Hillery is being instigated and eagerly stoked by Rove and his henchmen. I wish people would wake up to that probability and stop playing into their hands.

 

Comment by abraham | 2008-03-15 01:46:04

Ugh. You had me then you lost me when you went on and on and on screeching like a banshee. I don’t read Kos and don’t care. The reason people who support Obama hate Clinton is because she’s a hypocrite and a whore (in the political sense). They see a conniving, spiteful, vindictive, spoiled political creature who feels entitled to the presidency by virtual ordination.

I see a pathetic, unstable, over-ambitious, war mongering ex-president’s wife trying to overcome the humiliation she endured when her husband got his dick sucked by a young intern.

Obama’s no peach either: he needs to re-unite his balls with his scrotum and tell the Israeli lobby to go fuck themselves.

Here you are destroying the Dummycratic party as effectively as the Repugnantcans are by nominating that mental giant McCain. I say good! Good, god damn it, good!

A pox on both your god damn war mongering houses!

Comment by A.Citizen | 2008-03-15 01:55:12

Indeed thee are vengeful fellow Mr. A. I’d say you need immediate professional help.

Either that or start taking your meds. Without them you tend to be a trifle overheated in you rhetorical organs, pal.

Comment by abraham | 2008-03-15 02:09:10

Your critique falls flat due to its total lack of content, intelligence, or humor.

My condolences to your dear mother for having failed in your rearing.