<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s Shallow Credentials on National Security Are Dangerous for the Country</title>
	<atom:link href="http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/obamas-shallow-credentials-on-national-security-are-dangerous-for-the-country/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/obamas-shallow-credentials-on-national-security-are-dangerous-for-the-country/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Remember When Obama Said He Chaired the Banking Committee (Chris Dodd&#8217;s Committee)? : NO QUARTER</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/obamas-shallow-credentials-on-national-security-are-dangerous-for-the-country/#comment-796579</link>
		<dc:creator>Remember When Obama Said He Chaired the Banking Committee (Chris Dodd&#8217;s Committee)? : NO QUARTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 18:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/obamas-shallow-credentials-on-national-security-are-dangerous-for-the-country/#comment-796579</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Obama’s Shallow Credentials on National Security Are Dangerous for the Country&#8221; by Joseph [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Obama’s Shallow Credentials on National Security Are Dangerous for the Country&#8221; by Joseph [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Palin To Meet Karzai : NO QUARTER</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/obamas-shallow-credentials-on-national-security-are-dangerous-for-the-country/#comment-754907</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Palin To Meet Karzai : NO QUARTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 21:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/obamas-shallow-credentials-on-national-security-are-dangerous-for-the-country/#comment-754907</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8212; last but by no means least, as you will see &#8212; from Joseph Wilson&#8217;s &#8220;Obama&#8217;s Shallow Credentials on National Security Are Dangerous for the Country,&#8221; March 20, 2008, republished from Huffington Post: Senator Obama is clearly a gifted [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8212; last but by no means least, as you will see &#8212; from Joseph Wilson&#8217;s &#8220;Obama&#8217;s Shallow Credentials on National Security Are Dangerous for the Country,&#8221; March 20, 2008, republished from Huffington Post: Senator Obama is clearly a gifted [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AX10</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/obamas-shallow-credentials-on-national-security-are-dangerous-for-the-country/#comment-488739</link>
		<dc:creator>AX10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/obamas-shallow-credentials-on-national-security-are-dangerous-for-the-country/#comment-488739</guid>
		<description>Which is why he is but tied with McCain in the polls.
McCain has the experience, Obama has nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which is why he is but tied with McCain in the polls.<br />
McCain has the experience, Obama has nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/obamas-shallow-credentials-on-national-security-are-dangerous-for-the-country/#comment-181773</link>
		<dc:creator>simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 22:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/obamas-shallow-credentials-on-national-security-are-dangerous-for-the-country/#comment-181773</guid>
		<description>This week's TIME magazine has a report on Tony Lake, and Richard Holbrooke, Clinton's foreign policy adviser.

One of the suggestions  Clinton's campaign has made is the appointment of a US diplomatic envoy, to shuttle between Afghanistan, and Pakistan, an on site presence to help iron out and negotiate difficulties between those countries, and "Iraq's warring parties, too."

Holbrooke, with experience in Bosnia, would, according to TIME, make an excellent candidate, the man able to accomplish this mission. 

(As would Mr Wilson, no doubt).

Clinton has opened a door to a civilized, workable solution, US brain power as muscle to bring about some control, as opposed to this mess of military and mercenary jello we now see in the Middle East, courtesy of Bush.

Perhaps NATO does not want to contribute more in terms of troops and money because the Bush administration is so incompetent, as evidenced, well, everywhere.

Would you invest in Cheney's Pentagon team, Cheney's corrupt Pentagon?

Of course not.

Now imagine Obama in charge of this operation.

Why do people take him seriously? 

Because he makes them feel so hopeful.

Just don't mention real work, ok?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week&#8217;s TIME magazine has a report on Tony Lake, and Richard Holbrooke, Clinton&#8217;s foreign policy adviser.</p>
<p>One of the suggestions  Clinton&#8217;s campaign has made is the appointment of a US diplomatic envoy, to shuttle between Afghanistan, and Pakistan, an on site presence to help iron out and negotiate difficulties between those countries, and &#8220;Iraq&#8217;s warring parties, too.&#8221;</p>
<p>Holbrooke, with experience in Bosnia, would, according to TIME, make an excellent candidate, the man able to accomplish this mission. </p>
<p>(As would Mr Wilson, no doubt).</p>
<p>Clinton has opened a door to a civilized, workable solution, US brain power as muscle to bring about some control, as opposed to this mess of military and mercenary jello we now see in the Middle East, courtesy of Bush.</p>
<p>Perhaps NATO does not want to contribute more in terms of troops and money because the Bush administration is so incompetent, as evidenced, well, everywhere.</p>
<p>Would you invest in Cheney&#8217;s Pentagon team, Cheney&#8217;s corrupt Pentagon?</p>
<p>Of course not.</p>
<p>Now imagine Obama in charge of this operation.</p>
<p>Why do people take him seriously? </p>
<p>Because he makes them feel so hopeful.</p>
<p>Just don&#8217;t mention real work, ok?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The So Called &#8220;Hillary Lies About Bosnia&#8221; : NO QUARTER</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/obamas-shallow-credentials-on-national-security-are-dangerous-for-the-country/#comment-165741</link>
		<dc:creator>The So Called &#8220;Hillary Lies About Bosnia&#8221; : NO QUARTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 04:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/obamas-shallow-credentials-on-national-security-are-dangerous-for-the-country/#comment-165741</guid>
		<description>[...] [See No Quarter&#8217;s trove of stories on Obama&#8217;s failure to convene a single significant hearing of his European Affairs subcommittee (which covers NATO), or to visit any European countries. See in particular Joseph Wilson&#8217;s &#8220;Obama’s Hollow “Judgment” and Empty Record&#8221; and &#8220;Obama’s Shallow Credentials on National Security Are Dangerous for the Country.&#8221;] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [See No Quarter&#8217;s trove of stories on Obama&#8217;s failure to convene a single significant hearing of his European Affairs subcommittee (which covers NATO), or to visit any European countries. See in particular Joseph Wilson&#8217;s &#8220;Obama’s Hollow “Judgment” and Empty Record&#8221; and &#8220;Obama’s Shallow Credentials on National Security Are Dangerous for the Country.&#8221;] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cruz del sur</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/obamas-shallow-credentials-on-national-security-are-dangerous-for-the-country/#comment-164930</link>
		<dc:creator>Cruz del sur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 06:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/obamas-shallow-credentials-on-national-security-are-dangerous-for-the-country/#comment-164930</guid>
		<description>Gaming the system? Every single candidate plays by the same rule. It is not like the caucases are something new.

After all her bragging about her experience in the White House, she realices that she fell asleep during the process in which her husband ran for two elections? Sorry but I don't buy that. 

What I see is a candidate who has lost, and is trying to do anything possible to revert that result. 

Not too long ago, Larry said that what counted was the delegates. Now what counts is the popular vote. For me, trying to change the rules in the middle of the game equals cheating

As for the voters of Mi and Fl, they should have voiced their oposition BEFORE the election took place. And if necesary they should have boycotted the election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gaming the system? Every single candidate plays by the same rule. It is not like the caucases are something new.</p>
<p>After all her bragging about her experience in the White House, she realices that she fell asleep during the process in which her husband ran for two elections? Sorry but I don&#8217;t buy that. </p>
<p>What I see is a candidate who has lost, and is trying to do anything possible to revert that result. </p>
<p>Not too long ago, Larry said that what counted was the delegates. Now what counts is the popular vote. For me, trying to change the rules in the middle of the game equals cheating</p>
<p>As for the voters of Mi and Fl, they should have voiced their oposition BEFORE the election took place. And if necesary they should have boycotted the election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regency</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/obamas-shallow-credentials-on-national-security-are-dangerous-for-the-country/#comment-164742</link>
		<dc:creator>Regency</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 02:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/obamas-shallow-credentials-on-national-security-are-dangerous-for-the-country/#comment-164742</guid>
		<description>I don't think she's either lying or cheating. Frankly, the only cheating in politics is gaming the system (see caucuses for more info).  I think it's perfectly plausible that she realized, assuming she didn't know in the first place, that it would never be plausible not to let the election count or have a do-over. She advocates a do-over or a seating of the original results. Regardless of her orginal stance, that's what voters and FL and MI want to hear right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think she&#8217;s either lying or cheating. Frankly, the only cheating in politics is gaming the system (see caucuses for more info).  I think it&#8217;s perfectly plausible that she realized, assuming she didn&#8217;t know in the first place, that it would never be plausible not to let the election count or have a do-over. She advocates a do-over or a seating of the original results. Regardless of her orginal stance, that&#8217;s what voters and FL and MI want to hear right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cruz del sur</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/obamas-shallow-credentials-on-national-security-are-dangerous-for-the-country/#comment-164508</link>
		<dc:creator>Cruz del sur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/obamas-shallow-credentials-on-national-security-are-dangerous-for-the-country/#comment-164508</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I missed the "NO".

""It's clear, this election they're having is not going to count for anything," Clinton said Thursday during an interview on New Hampshire Public Radio's call-in program, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/11/AR2007101100859_pf.html

Now she wants to count the delegates and/or the popular vote?? Either she was lying then or she is cheating now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I missed the &#8220;NO&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8221;It&#8217;s clear, this election they&#8217;re having is not going to count for anything,&#8221; Clinton said Thursday during an interview on New Hampshire Public Radio&#8217;s call-in program, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/11/AR2007101100859_pf.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/11/AR2007101100859_pf.html</a></p>
<p>Now she wants to count the delegates and/or the popular vote?? Either she was lying then or she is cheating now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cruz del sur</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/obamas-shallow-credentials-on-national-security-are-dangerous-for-the-country/#comment-164503</link>
		<dc:creator>Cruz del sur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/obamas-shallow-credentials-on-national-security-are-dangerous-for-the-country/#comment-164503</guid>
		<description>Exactly! So why try to pin it in Obama now???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly! So why try to pin it in Obama now???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkL</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/obamas-shallow-credentials-on-national-security-are-dangerous-for-the-country/#comment-164454</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 18:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/20/obamas-shallow-credentials-on-national-security-are-dangerous-for-the-country/#comment-164454</guid>
		<description>Well, no, that was not part of the candidates' agreement on those states.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, no, that was not part of the candidates&#8217; agreement on those states.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
