RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

“N.C. GOP releases Rev. Wright ad”

UPDATE: This is about coattails. How much of a drag will Barack Obama be for state candidates, especially those who’ve endorsed him early on? Particularly in the South and in the West. Did you know that Barack Obama is polling behind John McCain in New Mexico? Besides the obvious example below of candidates in North Carolina — we have to think about the effect of endorsing Obama on Democratic candidates in states like New Mexico and Arizona.
________________________

The first video that Laluchasigue showed us this morning has no voiceover. This ad, running in major N.C. markets (starting tomorrow, I hear), has voiceover. Its title? “EXTREME.”

From the Charlotte Observer, which links the above video:

A new TV ad from the N.C. Republican Party tries to link two Democratic candidates for governor to Barack Obama’s controversial former minister.

“For 20 years, Barack Obama sat in his pew, listening to his pastor,” the ad says, segueing into video of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright shouting, “No, no, no. Not God Bless America. Goddamn America!”

The ad continues, “Now, Bev Perdue and Richard Moore endorse Barack Obama. They should know better. He’s just too extreme for North Carolina.”

[…]

The ad is titled “Extreme.” Republican chairwoman Linda Daves, of Charlotte, appears briefly at the end.

It is believed to be the first time nationwide that Republicans have used Wright’s comments in a TV advertisement since the comments first drew scrutiny last month.

Daves said at a news conference that the ad would begin airing statewide Monday during evening news shows. She said she did not know how much money the party plans to spend on airing the ad. The money is coming from individual donors, she said.

McCain denounced the ad, calling it “offensive” and saying it “degrades our civics and distracts us from the very real differences we have with the Democrats.” …

Here’s how this works: John McCain can stay above the fray by denouncing the ad, while the state GOP weakens its state Democratic opponents.

Here’s how this will work nationwide: This ad, and others of its ilk, will be used against every Democratic candidate across the nation who endorsed Barack Obama.

Now, surely GOP 527s would produce anti-Hillary ads if she’s the nominee. But they won’t be able to tar her as anti-American or consorting with unrepentant terrorists or a minister who hates “Amerikkka.”

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post96 Comments »

Comment by Nobama | 2008-04-23 20:30:15

Comment by Yvette | 2008-04-23 21:00:22

Oh my…I’m still laughing! Thanks.

 
 

Comment by Uppity | 2008-04-23 20:33:18

A lot of Democrats are going to lose races because of this jerk.

Comment by DisenfranchisedVoter | 2008-04-23 20:42:47

Sigh. I agree Uppity. We all knew this was going to happen. McCain can denounce these ads all he wants just like Bush “denounced” the swiftboat ads but that won’t stop them from airing. The GOP does this every election. This will not only bring down Obama but it will bring down the entire Democratic Party and it will take another Clinton-esque Democrat (should we wait another 20 years for Chelsea?) to bring back the Reagan Democrats and white working class vote. The Democrats are so screwed. This isn’t fun and games anymore. This is truly scary and Obama’s campaign would be dead by now if Hillary had dropped out sooner. The GOP would then have reason to pay full attention to Obama and smear him from now until November.

 

Comment by NomNomNom | 2008-04-23 20:56:08

Perdue and Moore both deserve to lose for endorsing Obama. Obama blocked the revote and tried (tries) to keep late states from having a meaningful vote [You can vote for Stalin or not vote for Stalin]. I’m a N.C.ian, and I was going to vote Perdue. Not now. The DNC has earned what’s coming to it. Best thing: Dean will go home and Obama can eat his waffle.

Comment by barbh | 2008-04-24 07:59:10

I was going to vote for her too, don’t know who I’ll vote for now maybe no one. I was real disappointed for her endorsing BO, I betcha she is wishing she had not now.

I really don’t want McCrory to be gov. I think he is in the pocket of every land developer around Charlotte, unbridled growth under his tenure without the infrastructure to support it..he will do the same thing statewide.

 
 

Comment by Kourian | 2008-04-23 21:37:18

No shit. This should have been a slam dunk for the Dems after eight years of W. Now Barry’s gonna crash the entire fucking party. MIGOD. Who else could fuck it up so bad? Unfuckingbelievable. Barry has to get out NOW to save the party.

 

Comment by Northwest rain | 2008-04-23 21:58:17

True — Obama has no coat tails.

I’m expecting Hillary to be the Democratic Nominee.

However, if Howie Deanie and Donna Brazile get their way in spite of what the the real democrats want . . . .

I have decided NOT to vote in the November GE. It was the stupid WA democratic leadership who forced a caucus on the WA state voters — when we voted for a Primary.

So anyway they don’t need my vote — so why bother to vote?

The only way to complete the suicide of the democratic party is to allow it to die. That is if Howie Deanie and Donna B. get the candidate they have been trying to force on America.

 
 

Comment by fran | 2008-04-23 20:38:55

When, for the love of God, are the Dem “leaders” going to wake up?! They think if they continue to shield Obama none of this will come up. Talk about denial.

Comment by Kourian | 2008-04-23 21:38:54

Maybe they’ve been bought off? ;)

 
 

Comment by sjl106 | 2008-04-23 20:42:01

Fox should have a link to the second ad that is running in NC. Hillary just may have a chance in NC…LOL and the whiners thought Hillary was tough?

Comment by barbh | 2008-04-24 08:31:55

Hillary had a good chance before the ads ran, all the talking heads keep talking about a HUGE black population here, only 20% of the population is black. They don’t know what they are talking about. There is close to 1.5 million unaffiliated voters (largely white would be my guess) who will be able to vote for a democratic candidate in the primary, democratic party has 2.2 some million registered dems.

I think the ads will hurt him here. You have to take the polls with a grain of salt, there is a huge number of undecideds and guess who undecideds are pretty consistently swinging to? HILLARY!!!! I don’t think things are quite as rosy for BO as the media portrays.

 
 

Comment by raymo | 2008-04-23 20:53:22

But the babies must have their rattle, so nothing else matters but to get Obama the nomination.

Comment by sandyR | 2008-04-23 21:13:14

 

Comment by Kourian | 2008-04-23 21:40:12

No joke: I know people who are seriously planning to emigrate in such case.

 
 

Comment by Mel | 2008-04-23 20:59:31

Don’t worry folks, this is just the Clinton’s doing it to Messiah Obama again!

The end of November will see a sea of Red and it won’t be anything but the blood of democrats paving the way to major victories for Republicans!

 

Pingback by Unity? Not so much … « The Confluence | 2008-04-23 21:03:18

[…] has an example of what might be in store for us if Obama takes either slot on our ticket — “N.C. GOP releases Rev. Wright ad” — how unifying is […]

 

Comment by sandyR | 2008-04-23 21:03:54

Great ad! I wrote to my two senators and governor
last month. I stated that they needed to support Hillary Clinton because she was the strongest candidate in the Democrat race. I pointed out that because our state votes Republican for President, our holding the two senate seats and the governorship is tenuous. And that were they to endorse Obama, that would cause downticket strength to Republicans. I received back the traditional
computer generated thank you note for my opinion.
But now they and all superdelegates– especially those in red states– can see what happens when you align yourself with Obama.
I will not donate to the GOP, I will not donate to the GOP…

 

Comment by ritamary | 2008-04-23 21:07:38

Those of us with any common sense knew these ads were coming. This is just the beginning.

Comment by Kourian | 2008-04-23 21:42:41

I hate when they bleep things. I wonder if the full effect - the full total scare of Jeremiah - will come through without it. Of course it might play the other way too. But yes - this is just the beginning.

 
 

Comment by scott | 2008-04-23 21:08:40

Barrys coat-tails are on fire. Come November if he ends up the nominee (NO!) the Dems will lose a lot of elections.

Comment by Uppity | 2008-04-23 21:09:57

…including and especially the presidential election.

Comment by scott | 2008-04-23 21:14:11

 
 
 

Comment by secularhumanizinevoluter | 2008-04-23 21:12:38

BWAHAHAHAHA! Maybe obamalamadingdong can whine some about this and the mean menz will jest go away.

 

Comment by Gloria | 2008-04-23 21:14:19

What if Hillary is the nominee and TPTB force Obama on as the VP???? I think that would drag her down!!!

Of course, Obama has said he doesn’t want to be VP… and I pray someone would convince him to actually stick to that…

Comment by scott | 2008-04-23 21:16:11

I think we would get to see a real belly laugh from Hillary now at the prospect of having an anvil on the ticket with her.

 

Comment by SusanUnPC | 2008-04-23 21:17:39

I pray she isn’t forced to accept him on the ticket. IF for any reason, she must, I will stand by her decision because I’ll figure that something absolutely critical forced her to do so. But I am certain that she would otherwise have NO desire to have him on her ticket.

Comment by Uppity | 2008-04-23 23:31:38

I would DEFINITELY not accept her as VP. I am sick of superior women making mediocre men look good. That is out for me. I wouldn’t vote for him if my mother was on his ticket.

 

Comment by J.Foreman | 2008-04-24 20:31:53

If she takes him as VP she won’t live long enough to do anything. He will jump into the first seat that he wants so badly at all costs.

 
 

Comment by Kourian | 2008-04-23 21:44:30

Let’s face it: Obama is a bad politician. How about that San Francisco mayor? Then you get 1) female; 2) black; 3) gay all on the same ticket. Slam dunk!

Comment by Uppity | 2008-04-23 21:49:18

In the Exit polls a full 47 percent of Hillary voters said they will NOT vote for Barack Obama.

 

Comment by Uppity | 2008-04-23 21:56:51

Obama refused to have his pick taken with that mayor. It flew thru the gay community like wildfire. He’s toast with them.

Comment by Kourian | 2008-04-23 23:34:53

That’s what I mean. It’d be perfect.

 
 
 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-04-24 06:08:37

I think it’s oo late for Baby-O on the VP slot…..He has proven to be immature…..His puppeteers should’ve vetted him better…In the internet age where information is accessible to the degree it is this is just arrogant incompetece….This is what Hillary has been sayin all year and now it’s finally catching up…..

 
 

Comment by SJ | 2008-04-23 21:17:29

I just saw a video on Taylor Marsh site where KO of MSNBC is talking about taking Hillary out, and when I say out I dont mean on a date.

Is some of the men in MSM going nuts, to come on the air and openly preach violence against a woman, what is really going on in this country?? I am so disgusted at what I am hearing in this election this has to be the worse election this country has very witnessed.

Comment by Uppity | 2008-04-23 21:50:12

With these thugs, I wouldn’t be surprised.

 
 

Comment by SJ | 2008-04-23 21:18:06

I just saw a video on Taylor Marsh site where KO of MSNBC is talking about taking Hillary out, and when I say out I dont mean on a date.

Is some of the men in MSM going nuts, to come on the air and openly preach violence against a woman, what is really going on in this country?? I am so disgusted at what I am hearing in this election this has to be the worse election this country has ever witnessed.

Comment by scott | 2008-04-23 21:35:35

Went and checked out that video. I think someone needs to take out Keith Im up Barrys Butt Olberman.

It always comes down to “What does barry need to do”.

 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-04-24 06:10:42

Hopefully….HE WILL BE OUTTA THERE…..KO that is…..

 
 

Comment by Mr X | 2008-04-23 21:27:06

Think back as if you were in early 2007. The DNC tells you that this is what they want for a nominee.

1. Someone who lost ALL critical swing states of FL, OH and PA.
2. Someone who lost the popular vote.
3. Someone who kicks FL and MI voters to the curb and then claims their votes and delegates don’t count (thus deceitfully circumventing #2) and claims his name wasn’t on the ballot in MI while at the same time refusing a revote.
4. Someone who insults middle America.
5. Someone who’s only big state win is his home state.
6. Someone who has lost most core democratic states.
7. Someone who has won the majority of red states that will not come into play in November.
8. Someone who will turn guaranteed blue states like Massachusetts into a swing state.
9. Someone who associates with known unrepenting terrorists.
10. Someone who bowls a 37.

Think clearly now. In early 2007, would you have accepted such a nominee? Is this what the DNC is looking for? Or would you have laughed at the above description?

But of course, the delegate count in what matters the most in November, right? Right? Personally, I’ve never heard of delegates counting for anything in November. They mean diddly squat.

Comment by Kourian | 2008-04-23 21:57:59

It’s a job. And when you apply for a job you present a CV. And what’s always at the bottom of a CV? Your references.

What would be at the bottom of Hill’s CV? Almost every general in the US armed forces.

What’s at the bottom of Barry’s CV? Tony Rezko, the Daley mafia, and Jeremiah Wright.

You’re head of HR. It’s your call. You have two applicants for the job. Which one do you take? Which one does anyone take?

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-04-24 06:13:28

Ehemmm………Barry does’nt have a CV because he has only been PRESENT in the US senate for a year before he started to run…..Barry has a one page MONSTER resume……And that aint’ enough…..chuckle…..

 

Comment by sjc-tx | 2008-04-25 11:36:58

“”It’s a job. And when you apply for a job you present a CV. And what’s always at the bottom of a CV? Your references.”"

EXACTLYYYYYYY!!!!

Comment by Mars | 2008-04-25 15:18:43

For those of us who are more intelligent than that of a walnut. Your references are to verify that you are who you say you are! They are not representatives. So the rhetoric of someones reference can’t be used to prevent one from getting the job or gettig the job done. Can we please stop the stupidity? It seems to be contagious on this blog!

 
 
 

Comment by Uppity | 2008-04-23 21:58:46

 
 

Comment by Mary Jo Kopechne | 2008-04-23 21:28:03

Here’s a link to a story on Fox online saying that McCain has asked the NC GOP to pull this ad. It goes on to say that McCain states that Rev Wright is not fair game. I’m hoping that this is just pro-forma by McCain.

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/04/23/mccain-disavows-ad-but-calls-obama-bitter-comments-elitist/

Comment by Garlic-Nosed Guitarist | 2008-04-23 21:37:10

McCain states that Rev Wright is not fair game

That’s meaningless. He can disavow the ads and they run them. He benefits from the ads without taking too much heat for them.

He could honestly be against the ads but its meaningless.

And in my view, Wright is fair game — its Obama’s 20 year affiliation with him and Obama’s poor judgment that I call into question — as does America.

Comment by Kourian | 2008-04-23 21:59:35

Of course it’s fair game. It’s a question of your references. As with any job.

Comment by Garlic-Nosed Guitarist | 2008-04-24 00:11:09

Good point!

 
 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-04-24 06:14:40

McInsane is snickering right now…..

 
 

Comment by Uppity | 2008-04-23 22:00:08

Oh Mccain is just doing that so he can say “I tried to stop it, it’s not me”. It’s like the swift boat stuff. The ad will run and you won’t hear from McCain again. It’s hard to believe I may have to vote for him in November.

Comment by Kourian | 2008-04-23 23:38:33

It’s hard to believe I may have to vote for him in November.

‘It’s dirty work but someone’s got to do it.’ ;)

 
 
 
 

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-04-23 21:42:24

Dayum we sent in our absentee ballots a few days ago and I voted for Perdue.

I had no clue she was an Obamabot!
Had I known……. I would have picked another.

We get to see Hillary tomorrow! YaY!!

 

Comment by Garlic-Nosed Guitarist | 2008-04-23 21:49:49

Dayum we sent in our absentee ballots a few days ago and I voted for Perdue.

You could always beg to have your vote changed to “present.” :)

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-04-23 21:56:15

aw shoot Guitarist! I never even considered it! I’m just too opinionated. Saying “present” would just be a COP OUT for me!

but that’s just MY feelings about it (ribrib)

Comment by Garlic-Nosed Guitarist | 2008-04-23 21:58:10

 
 

Comment by Kourian | 2008-04-23 22:01:07

Yes. Change your vote if you can. Obamabot alert: if you support any Dem candidate at all, make sure you know their position on Barry first.

 
 

Comment by Untilthelastdogdies | 2008-04-23 21:50:29

So McCain will once again take the high road whilst HRC will probably get blamed
for this latest round of RAM behavior.

I agree, Wright is indeed fair game and we will be suffering the consequences of that right up until election eve.

 

Comment by Uppity | 2008-04-23 21:52:06

I bet this knuckle head thinks if he picks Hillary as VP that we will all spawn for him. Oh goodie, another superior woman holding up a mediocre man. Let the bastard hang and wait four years if they steal this number. He will never win anyhow.

Comment by Kourian | 2008-04-23 22:02:31

Perish the thought but should it come to that Hill can do a lot more good somewhere else. She’d wither away in the shadow of someone as vapid as he.

 

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-04-23 23:21:52

>>> Oh goodie, another superior woman holding up a mediocre man.

Yeah, none of my ex-wives (I call ‘em all the same name - “Plaintiff”) were real excited about that program, either.

 
 

Comment by Sugar | 2008-04-23 22:05:46

Obama is a cancer to each of those superdelegates who have endorsed him and they may not realize it yet, but that bamboozlement will be show itself to many more soon enough.

Comment by Garlic-Nosed Guitarist | 2008-04-23 22:29:53

Hello Sugar,

I wanted you to know a blog piece you wrote inspired me to write a letter to some black leaders about what you have been going through on your blog.

Discrimination is discrimination. We are supposed to be a free country and you should never be discriminated against because of your Constitutional right to associate with whom you wish. I am speaking of the pressure on you to conform as if you were a cog in a huge machine/monolith of having to support Obama because you are black.

As far as the superdelegate/bamboozlement point you raised:

It is truth that there is a MSM bias towards helping Obama. I’ve predicted if he is nominated that bias will switch to McCain. Maybe it won’t. But maybe it won’t matter:

I get the feeling the super D’s are very nervous now about Obama. Those who have said they support him are probably having major buyers remorse. Those who feel pressured to conform will probably not jump on his bandwagon since he can’t win a big state (other than his own), and all the other well documented issues making him unelectable.

There could be a mass exodus of his super D’s if another scandal breaks. I think he is on the teetering edge of oblivion and it won’t take much to push him over the edge.

Only that fucking idiot Obama and his handlers could turn the first (used to be) viable black candidate into a discrimination-fest.

As I have said before, I am open to all peoples and when a seasoned, empathic and wise black women or man with great judgment is presented to me as a choice for President, I will not hesitate to vote for them. Obama is none of those good things. In fact he is worse — he and his thugs have managed to turn the clock back 50 years on “race” relations.

You will never achieve equality by bullying yourself into power. Nelson Mandella knew this. He achieved equality with his mind and super-human wisdom.

I wrote this to a colleague last night, and I was referring to the Obama/MSM/corporate/far-left-loony alliance:

“What a bunch of clueless fucks, they are slitting their own throats / liberties in the process of “winning” just like has happened time and time again throughout human history. Human beings refuse to get the clue that empires by force are doomed by their own creation.”

Those involved in the desire to control and in the actual empire creation are myopic by nature. If they would have 360-degree vision like some of our great leaders, there would not be an Obama candidate. He is manufactured out of whole-cloth for the purposes of a “Bush III Presidency,” in my view — just another corporate guy that will have his strings pulled by people whose big-fish/little-pond ego and greed-based way if we allow it to continue, will end in doom for our great country.

Thanks for all your hard work and dedication to Hillary! :)

Ciao,

G-N-G

 

Comment by Uppity | 2008-04-23 23:22:56

sugar you and I both know that some of them endorsed via fear.

 
 

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-04-23 22:09:31

Hey Sugar!! :-]

I’ve been lame today and not visited your nice site. I think I’ll go check it out right now.

Cheers to a Great PA victory!!

Comment by Eurogirl70 | 2008-04-23 22:26:22

Did anyone else hear about what Olberman said regarding one of the SD’s needing to take Hillary into a room and “only HE coming out”? First off, there are female super delegate. The anti-Hillary, anti woman bias is alive and well. As if only a man could take her out. Quite frankly, with the way that she has performed with grace under fire, a tube of Kryptonite couldn’t do it!

Second, apparently Olberman had Rachel Maddow on and they both were of the mindset that Hillary has a responsibility to come out against this GOP ad targeting Obama. They said something to the effect that the Obama people should take out an ad that reads: “if Hillary won’t come out in support of her Democratic challenger, why do you think she would come out in support of you?”

Where in the hell do these people come from? Is this a sewing bee or a presidential primary? The GOP takes out an ad in NC and somehow Hillary should bear the responsibility to castigate the NC Republicans for demeaning her competitor! I tell you it all makes sense now as to why John Kerry is so pro-Obama and anti-Hillary. I kid you not, but I think that John Kerry thinks that it was the responsibility of the Clinton’s to defend his war record for him, in the court of public opinion, so that he could stay above the fray.

Comment by Uppity | 2008-04-23 22:44:25

Oh please,I had to hold my nose to vote for Kerry. I will never do that again.

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-04-23 22:47:14

D I T T O!!!

Comment by Eurogirl70 | 2008-04-23 22:53:01

I feel the same way. What I was saying is that every single so-called Democrat who has either come out in support of Obama or who has railed against Senator Clinton has done so because rather than blaming themselves for their own failings, they would rather lay them at the feet of the Clinton’s.

Kerry-loser
Brazile-couldn’t lead a Democratic candidate to victory with a map and a flashlight
Kennedy-remember my name. So I ran against an incumbent president and couldn’t answer the simple question of why I wanted to be president in the first place.

I mean the list of de facto losers on the Democratic side goes on and on. They know that with the Clinton’s they will have to bring their “A game” and they know they don’t have one. They want the position, but don’t want to do the hard work. That is why they have found a kindred spirit in Obama.

 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-04-24 06:18:28

LOL……..Yeah Kerry was a difficult vote…..That’s the last time I consciously vote for a complete loser……Rather stay at home and be able to wake up to myself in the morning…..Just sayin’…A Vote is a terrible thing to waste……

 
 
 

Comment by Garlic-Nosed Guitarist | 2008-04-23 22:49:19

Quite frankly, with the way that she has performed with grace under fire, a tube of Kryptonite couldn’t do it!

Love it!

Worry for not, stick with the plan and keep hammering away at this:

Obama is unelectable due to scandals of his own making, inability to win important states, etc.

The delegates will flip to Hillary given time, and time is Obama’s worst enemy. His cruise control is set to land him into oblivion of the history books, and not as President. :)

 
 
 

Comment by MoodSwingeR | 2008-04-23 22:34:12

I kept saying this all along:

Once the Party commits to a candidate, it OWNS the candidate and all his/her baggage.

If Obama is our nominee, then WE, TOO, STAND BEHIND WRIGHT, REZKO, AYERS, AUCHI, GIANNOULIAS, and countless others.

Our choice.

Comment by Garlic-Nosed Guitarist | 2008-04-23 22:40:38

Hello,

I’m not sure what you mean. But for the sake of argument I’ll assume you are a Hillary supporter warning everyone what a disaster it would be to commit to him because of all his terrible baggage?

 
 

Comment by simon, too | 2008-04-23 22:39:50

I wonder, sometimes, if Obama enjoys an OJ bounce.

Meaning even if AA voters recognize him as the inferior candidate, they vote for him because he, with his OJ defiance, and threats, represents retribution against racist Anglos.

I don’t know if this is true, but I kind of get that feeling, sometimes, reading.

Very sad.

I would see an opening for a strong black leader to emerge, ala MLK, to counter.

I hope.

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-04-23 22:48:50

Maybe Sugar! (and why NOT a woman?)

;-)

Comment by Garlic-Nosed Guitarist | 2008-04-23 22:51:56

 
 

Comment by stodghie | 2008-04-24 00:59:50

it would seem to me that obama has slanted his campaign in that direction. it is often subtle, but lately it is much mor apparent with the rapper hand signals. throw in michelle’s and rev wrong’s snotty attitudes, what you have a a lot of red flags saying beware of these people. humility, kindness, humanity, graciousiness are simply words in a dictionary to them. there is rage that is fueled by a “liberation theology” that tells them they are victims and we are nothing but souless oppressors. now it the good people of illinois want to send him to the senate with the baggage, then fine. if he goes off the rails, others can vote him down. but there is no way he can be president now. i wish he was what he projected himself to be.

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-04-24 06:25:19

Marxism takes no prisoners……Marxism is the social justice solution at the foundation of LIBERATION THEOLOGY….Hard to have a liberal society under MARXISM……

 
 
 

Comment by sam | 2008-04-23 22:54:40

http://youtube.com/watch?v=sN1qZMBE9Gc

Didn’t Barrack from from divorced parent’s? Um, sorry Michelle, open mouth, insert Obama

this woman is a so arrogant ,,,makes me puke

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-04-23 23:26:15

Watch it, or you could get a visit from Winnie Mandela’s…er, Michelle Obama’s Soccer Club.

 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-04-24 06:27:27

Ehemmmmm…….MICHELLE PAY YOUR PROPERTY TAXES…..Nuff said….

 

Comment by Mars | 2008-04-24 13:25:57

She seems arrogant only becuase you’re intimidated!!!! Be a man!

 
 

Comment by jyotinc | 2008-04-23 23:35:22

they’re both toast, for sure i’m not going to vote for them.

 

Comment by Garlic-Nosed Guitarist | 2008-04-23 23:55:36

PAGING UPPITY

Hey Uppity,

That guy who was concerned about the 9.2 vs. 10 figure on the margin:

That post of Hillary on TV video clips Wednesday morning clearly shows the MSM was reporting a 10 point spread. So anyone who used that figure today was doing so without trying to beef up the number as he implied.

At least a couple of the videos show the spread as 10 points. The CNN video caption is:

Clinton captures PA.
Beats Obama by 10 points.

If that guy is reading this, he should complain to CNN and not so much here? :) I kinda thought I was not hallucinating the 10 point figure. But as of a few hours ago, the unofficial spread from the state of PA was 9.2, but that’s not final.

 

Comment by sam | 2008-04-23 23:59:39

Pollster John Zogby: Let me start with the observation that Hillary Clinton did not win Pennsylvania by running a negative campaign. The negatives that came out against Barack Obama were self-inflicted mistakes - his comment about “bitter” Pennsylvanians, his bobbling of questions over why he sometimes does not wear an American flag pin in his lapel, and lingering questions about his Chicago pastor, the Reverend Jeremiah Wright. He compounded his trouble by going negative against Clinton, because in doing so he took himself off his core message of hope, change, and the promise of a new kind of politics. He became just another politician.

And coming under the heading of “Things I Didn’t Need,” these multiple negative issues cropped up against him all at the same time, when he was already running in a state where the demographics were stacked against him. Pennsylvania was never realistically a winner for Obama anyway, but he may have done some damage to himself by responding the way he did. We do not yet know
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1489

 

Comment by sam | 2008-04-24 00:01:13

It would be a colossal error for the Obama campaign to respond to attacks by lashing out at the Clintons and dragging their old scandals back out into the public square. Exit polling from Pennsylvania shows that a significant percentage of Clinton supporters - 43% - would either vote for Republican John McCain in a general election match-up against Barack Obama, or would stay home, and Obama is not going to win those Clinton voters over to his team by bringing all the old Clinton scandals back to life. And should he win the nomination, he will desperately need those supporters.

 

Comment by jtool | 2008-04-24 00:07:30

What a crock - the SF Chronicle’s political reporter (hah) writes an article that quotes some University of San Francisco professor (”teaches classes in race and politics”) who not only accuses Bill Clinton of inserting race into the campaign in S Carolina, but compares Obama’s Wright problems to a “lynching to the 15th power”. Yes, now his supporters are talking about LYNCHING.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/04/23/MN3A10AHNB.DTL

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-04-24 06:22:43

This guy at the SF chronical is inciting violence……Isn’t that ILLEGAL…Even in San Francisco….Yellow Journalism at it’s best….Thse people are makin Imus look like a moderate….Sheeeesh…..

 
 

Comment by rwc | 2008-04-24 00:27:33

The night of the long knives has begun. Barry will be sliced and diced within a month of Denver and the party bosses will go “what happened?” as Barry’s coat tails turn into a ball-n-chain for every sitting Democrat that has endorsed him.

Remember if the GOP can sink a war vet with a impeccable background like Max Cleland imagine what they are going to Democrats who back Barry despite knowing the assholes and anti-American thugs he hangs with.

The carnage will be magnificent and will stand as a testament to the flaming incompetence and arrogance of the party elite.

That said, as others have pointed out the Democratic party has a bad habit of selecting total losers and effete fops for preznit. People that have no appeal beyond the party hacks that vote for them in those caucuses.

The Dems need to get rid of the caucus system if they want a chance at ever getting the presidency. Otherwise WJC will be just a fluke.

The party needs to let working class people have a say for once. Not a bunch of upper income types who have nothing better to do than play charade at the local caucus gathering or let operatives bused in from certain campaigns to game the vote.

And oh yeah…dump Iowa and NH, they had their day in the sun and its time for other states to be first.

 

Comment by JoeySky | 2008-04-24 06:57:01

George Soros will soon realize that Obama was a very bad investment.

&nb