RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Hillary Rap (& Open Thread)

UPDATES: Hillary has two new superdelegates: (1) Bill George, DNC member since 1996 and President of the Pennsylvania AFL-CIO (because Hilary is the most “electable,” and (2) Luisette Cabanas at the Universidad del Sagrado Corazon (Puerto Rico). ALSO from that MyDD diary: “This makes 6 new Super delegates (if I count correctly) added to Hillary Clinton’s column since her impressive victory in Pennsylvania last week. Now, if Barack Obama has all the super delegates he needs ‘in the wings’, as his campaign would like you to believe, why would Democratic officials, especially such high-profile ones as Governor Easley of North Carolina.”

See also: Politico’s Ben Smith on why No. Carolina governor Mike Easley’s endorsement yesterday was so important: “New Clinton supporter is a potent symbol.”

Enjoy!


What else is going on in the world? (I have a new story coming up that should cause some shockwaves in Barry’s world.)

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post125 Comments »

Comment by waldenpond | 2008-04-30 11:45:26

Fox was just showing this video.

Comment by Kourian | 2008-04-30 12:46:31

FOX had it on? Oh wow. That’s good! It’ll spread! Great!

 
 

Comment by votehillary08 | 2008-04-30 11:48:39

love this video! It has the same tough, confident attitude that our girl, Hill has.

Comment by Kourian | 2008-04-30 12:47:47

You mean that’s not her in the video? That’s not her in the bubble bath drinking champagne? ;)

 
 

Comment by it'snotme | 2008-04-30 11:50:30

LOL! I love it!

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-04-30 12:04:18

So glad you posted this…..I love this…..

 
 

Comment by Paul F. Villarreal AKA "Universal" AKA "RokSki" | 2008-04-30 11:53:17

Who is that woman? I like that video!

Here are a series of videos discussing Wright & Obama in the wake of Obama’s poll-test-mandated press conference yesterday:

Barack & Wright: After the Press Conference

Comment by Uppity | 2008-04-30 12:04:46

I have no idea who she is but she sure did a great job.

Comment by beebop | 2008-04-30 12:17:41

The laugh is what sells me … I am your Daddy! SMACK!

 

Comment by sonia | 2008-04-30 12:28:57

i know u r a true supporter

so i am pasting my message below here too ,,,,,,,take action pls
rep lois capps switched her support to ,,OBAMA TODAY

SHE IS IN CA( hill won ca)
i am in ca,,,,

so i called her and gave her the sh,,,t she deserves

here is the number ,,Phone: (202) 225-3601daniel will pick up

everyone call this 70yr white b,,,

Comment by Andy | 2008-04-30 12:56:08

Probably Obama threw a few thousand dollars her way. Obama has been showering money to SD.

Is she up for re-election?

 

Comment by Andy | 2008-04-30 13:01:29

She looks like Pelosi in blond … Probably got her arm twisted by Nancy. But the $$$ BO probably gave her got to her.

People in this blog from CA should phone her.

 
 

Comment by Kourian | 2008-04-30 12:48:37

Rachael Drummond and her brother Alex IIRC.

 
 
 

Comment by John | 2008-04-30 12:00:09

For brain-dead Obamabot ranting on the net,nothing beats a visit to Taegan Goddard’s Political Wire. I encourage any of you who want a laugh to check it out and try to carry out a conversation with the regular posters. Demolishing their inconsistent arguments is like shooting fish in a barrell; the SAME posters have argued in recent weeks that

1. The popular vote is what matters in determining a nominee
2. The popular vote has nothing to do with picking the nominee, only delegates count
3. If the Superdelegates nominate Hillary, they are evil
4. Superdelegates can do whatever they want (now that they are going for Obama)
5. Superdelegates need to support the candidate who won their state
6. Kerry, Kennedy, Patrick, Richardson etc. have every right to support Obama even though Hillary won their states.
8. Any rules that favor Obama are good– posted just today: “Hillary won the popular vote in Texas and got steamrolled in the caucuses? OH BOO HOO!” (That’s the level of discourse you get there. But when Hillary airs an effective ad? She’s being unfair and racist.)
9. Any poll that is favorable to Obama is worth publishing, no matter how obscure. Even if it’s an online poll.

Goddard even published as a “news” story a remark by David Axelrod that Clinton can’t win and should withdraw. Yeah, that’s “news.”

And when they can’t refute your arguments for Hillary, you are a racist, and I won’t type what Hillary is.

I used to go there just for fun, now I feel like I’m just banging my head against the wall.

Comment by Uppity | 2008-04-30 12:06:30

Love this John. mind if I use it sometime? With appropriate recognition of course!

Comment by John | 2008-04-30 12:11:52

You can use anything I type and I will be nothing but honored. Have you checked out Goddard’s site? I think it’s a refugee camp for people who find the level of discourse at HuffPo and MoveOn above their reading level.

Comment by Uppity | 2008-04-30 12:14:33

Can you give me a link? I love circular stuff from them.

Comment by John | 2008-04-30 12:18:43

http://politicalwire.com/

I encourage everyone to visit and try to argue, just get ready to be called a moron or troll or RACIST! when it becomes obvious to the person you are talking to that you are much smarter than the average visitor. I’ve even been accused of wanting to “date” a poster I was trying to have an argument with- that’s not an uncommon response when they’ve run out of intelligent arguments, which does not take long.

Comment by Uppity | 2008-04-30 12:28:13

 
 
 

Comment by Jeff | 2008-04-30 12:19:26

“I think it’s a refugee camp for people who find the level of discourse at HuffPo and MoveOn above their reading level.”

Don’t you mean below?

Comment by John | 2008-04-30 12:24:44

No, I mean the posts at PoliticalWire are even more vapid than the ones at HuffPo.

 
 
 
 

Comment by Kourian | 2008-04-30 12:55:50

How old are these people? They sound like they’ll be first time voters in 2020. ;)

 
 

Comment by secularhumanizinevoluter | 2008-04-30 12:02:30

I L-O-V-E this video!! Clinton should offer to do a cameo in a redo! FUNNY and the women are HOT! JUST likr Hillary!

 

Comment by Kefa | 2008-04-30 12:06:30

ot—Damage Control????

As it applies to Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), blowback may well be the unintended consequences of this week’s public relations blitz, with appearances by Rev. Jeremiah Wright, pastor of Chicago’s Trinity United Church of Christ, at the NAACP, on PBS with Bill Moyers, and a press conference at the National Press Club, with damage control orchestrated on his behalf by David Axelrod, Obama’s chief strategist.

On April 29, 2008, the Washington Post reported the Obama campaign said Rev. Wright “had rebuffed their recent offers of public relations assistance, and they stressed that they had no warning about a media blitz.”

However, Greg Sargent reported the following April 3, 2008, at Talking Points Memo:

Here’s an interesting peek at some of what was going on behind the scenes in Chicago during the controversy over Jeremiah Wright, the pastor at Obama’s Trinity church.

I’m told that top Obama adviser David Axelrod privately tried to help Trinity with its raging public relations problem by asking one of Chicago’s top P.R. firms to go in and help the church deal with its P.R. mess.

Axelrod confirms to me that amid the controversy, Trinity put out word that it was overwhelmed by media calls and in need of help. Axelrod confirms that he called Jim Terman, the president of Jasculca-Terman and Associates, a major Chicago P.R. outfit that specializes in doing crisis P.R. management for corporations and large institutions.

“I called Jim Terman and asked if they were interested in helping out and they followed up with the church,” Axelrod emails, adding that his involvement ended there.

Terman himself confirmed that Axelrod had asked him to help Trinity — and confirmed that his firm was currently doing pro bono work on the beleagured church’s behalf.

“Trinity is a well respected institution in this town, though you wouldn’t believe it from the national press,” Terman said, adding that he has known Axelrod for 25 years. “David was interested in helping the church — the guy he’s working for happens to be a member of the church.”

It’s unclear whether Axelrod was operating partly out of worry about how the controversy was impacting Obama — after all, the church was the first to sound the call for help. But this is nonetheless noteworthy — a glimpse at a previously-unseen aspect of the Obama camp’s efforts to deal with the whole situation.

http://rezkowatch.blogspot.com/

You be the judge.

Comment by Uppity | 2008-04-30 12:38:14

I love that Rezkowatch blog. That person is really putting his/her heart into following that thief.

 
 

Comment by Patti | 2008-04-30 12:07:07

loved the video…

 

Comment by vbonnaire | 2008-04-30 12:07:24

Hi Uppity, Larry & Susan UnPC–
I found an article I want you to have Larry. It has names you and Bud White may want to know about — also it is out of Chicago. Also, I just came from Savagepolitics.com and there is a really important piece up over there regarding what we are seeing as an unfolding hate we haven’t seen since the 30’s. I’m pretty sure that given what I have seen in the advertising/marketing end we are looking at a propaganda thing not unlike what happened before once upon a time…like you, the editor over there JC, is very bright and leaves no stone unturned. You can’t dismiss associations you’ve had or people or pastors with a snap of the fingers—you know way more than I of all these things — thanks!

here:
http://www.cdobs.com/archive/our-columns/taking-stock-of-barack,1041/

Comment by simon, too | 2008-04-30 12:14:24

I would think the hate peaked with it’s use by Rove as a means of dividing, and conquering, remember where Obama’s stole his strategy.

Obama’s team, top to bottom, is just so amateur, so unable to execute Rove’s master plan.

Don’t they just strike you as a bunch of wannabe’s, who thought it would be so easy, simply because they have neither the skill, nor the intellect to understand the contingencies?

The A teams, democratic, or republican, did not assemble behind Obama, no matter what the appearence.

Comment by vbonnaire | 2008-04-30 12:26:03

No, Simon. I’m following the target-marketing and the use of subliminals. I’m watching the proletariat, and researching things that are “doubleplusungood” happen. Flineo and I are on the same page with it. I’m just slower!

Comment by apishapa | 2008-04-30 13:18:49

I read your series on Propaganda this week. Very illuminating, and scary.

Comment by vbonnaire | 2008-04-30 13:46:45

thanks! I’m trying to do my part, using my education and my work experiences. My two main careers were at a newspaper, then therapist. I spent a lot of time working for the poor, and so I know what we need to do here, ala WPA, pretty soon, before it gets worse. I’ve been looking at the advertising end because I know that part. The “astroturfing” has led to the obamabot thing happening en masse. Target marketing taken to extremes by Axelrod by using words in propaganda-style manner— like the spin we see–in propaganda this is a tactic, any bad events are respun too fast for the mass to notice–past regimes used this tactic, too.

 
 
 
 

Comment by Escoffier | 2008-04-30 13:24:58

The Center for Public Intellectuals? Ayers, Dohrn, and Obama thy name is vanity. This is hilarious.

 
 

Comment by John | 2008-04-30 12:08:36

Bill Press on Air Obama Radio this morning:

“I dont understand how the Rev. Wright story can continue. It’s over. Obama has denounce the Rev Wright. Why can’t we just let it go? I mean, Hillary had her Bosnia problem, and we’ve let that go. Why not this?

First- talk about a complete non sequitor. What does Obama’s 20-year relatioship with a “spiritual advisor” who turns out to be an unrepentant race-baiting bigot have to do with Hillary’s slightly exaggerating flying into Bosnia? Where is the moral equivalency here?

Second, how have you “let go” something you just brought up, out of the blue, which has no connection to the topic at hand?

Sounds like Press is threatening that if the media keeps bringing up Wright, he’ll keep bringing up Hillary/Bosnia. What the fuck ever, Mr. Press. Blaming Hillary for this problem, and every other problem Obama has is, after all, is what you Obamabots do anyway. Just try to make some sense next time, please.

Comment by simon, too | 2008-04-30 12:16:22

Do they still think the situations are equal, the playing fields equal?

What a bunch of morons.

Comment by beebop | 2008-04-30 12:42:06

Simon:

The Hindenburg crashing wasn’t as spectacular as watching Barry come back to earth. They don’t make wings like they used to, do they Icarus?

http://youtube.com/watch?v=F54rqDh2mWA

 
 

Comment by B-Rob | 2008-04-30 12:33:34

Hillary’s slightly exaggerating flying into Bosnia

The Warrior Queen of Tuzlah did NOT exaggerate anything! They have it on YouTube!

http://youtube.com/watch?v=uHVEDq6RVXc&feature=related

Comment by B-Rob's MOM | 2008-04-30 12:59:04

Well maybe she didn’t but I sure did when I told your father I loved him! And we weren’t protected! And look what’s happened now!

Comment by beebop | 2008-04-30 13:02:27

I love you whoever did this …

I have an idea or two but I don’t want to know.

I want to think that at least five or six of you clever souls are capable and would (did) do this….. ;)

 

Comment by Garlic-Nosed Guitarist | 2008-04-30 13:03:08

“B-Rob’s MOM” - LMAO/OAML.

 

Comment by it'snotme | 2008-04-30 13:33:03

ROTFLMAO! B-Rob’s mom gets a THUMBS UP from me! LOL!

 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-04-30 14:01:01

Ehemmm…..I propose B-ROB’S MOM for Sec. of Education in Clinton’ cabinet….chuckle….

Comment by John | 2008-04-30 17:52:41

Oh please! As if anyone would admit be being B-Rob’s mom!

 
 
 

Comment by Andy | 2008-04-30 13:07:11

YAWN…. it’s that the best you got???

 
 

Comment by Jeff | 2008-04-30 13:08:14

“Hillary’s slightly exaggerating flying into Bosnia?”

What planet have you been on? No one “slightly exaggerated” anything. She made it up. No sentient being misremembers being shot at. It doesn’t happen. If you say you were shot at, and shots were never fired, you were lying.

Personally, I don’t think it’s the kind of issue that the campaign should revolve around. But if you’re going to twist the truth, you’re going to get called on it.

 
 

Comment by Garlic-Nosed Guitarist | 2008-04-30 12:12:06

Damage Control????

That would be like trying to patch the Titanic right after it hit the iceberg — the ship is still gonna sink. :)

Comment by beebop | 2008-04-30 13:03:35

Drinking coffee after being caught asleep at the wheel?

Checking all of your pockets after remember that you shoved a telegram in one of them?

 
 

Comment by jwrjr | 2008-04-30 12:18:09

I saw a new NC campaign ad by Clinton this morning. It states that Clinton proposed a plan to help homeowners with their mortgages, and a plan for a federal gas tax holiday which includes how to pay for it. Obama opposed both. Any moment now we will be inundated with complaints about Clinton’s negative campaigning.

Comment by John | 2008-04-30 12:22:16

Hillary Clinton calls for a federal tax on gas holiday and proposes to pay for it with a windfall tax on oil.

The media’s response is to tell us that “John McCain and Hillary Clinton have both called for a federal tax on gas holiday, but Barack Obama disagrees” followed by clips of Obama calling it “another Washington idea which will do nothing to solve the long-term problem,” followed by cheers from his groupies. And then nothing- no plan at all from Obama.

I am so sick of this BS.

Comment by Garlic-Nosed Guitarist | 2008-04-30 12:33:59

We will prove to the world the mainstream media are irrelevant. Let those gasbags continue their flatulence. We’ll see who wins this battle.

 

Comment by apishapa | 2008-04-30 13:27:59

Obama isn’t paying $600/month to get back and forth from work. The big oil companies already owe $10 billion in uncollected taxes. They are making record profits, there is no reason to cut them any slack at all.

In fact, I think farmers might need to lose a few subsidies, too. I expect the neighbors to be outside with pitchforks when I get home, since I live in a rural farming community, but they are cleaning up with $11/bu wheat right now. And still paying shit wages to their employees.

 
 
 

Comment by vbonnaire | 2008-04-30 12:18:40

one more thing…(this place is very conservative and not my usual sort of read but…short and to the same point…catcha later alligators! or should I say PressCorps pals? I don’t know what was said in toto about JFK, but he is sacred ground to me. My whole life grew up around his values, and MLK’s. That is what is making all this so horrible. My world and O’s world? Two different places, completely. I remember my mother in tears watching JackieO — Caroline K and I are same gen.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/04/the_obama_aesthetic.html

Comment by simon, too | 2008-04-30 12:20:57

JFK is sacred to me, too, if you’re speaking of NQ, Susan and Larry are very tolerant, very respectful of others views, it’s America, isn’t it?

Comment by Garlic-Nosed Guitarist | 2008-04-30 12:29:36

They are indeed respectful and this site is a safe haven for Hillary supporters. The dissenters here only further our resolve and serve a valuable purpose. Being a dissenter myself (I opposed the war earlier on than many people) we should never censor, even if we find some views distasteful and/or unagreeable. So as much as the Obama supporters “logic” makes no sense at all to me, they should be welcomed here.

Comment by simon, too | 2008-04-30 12:39:19

They’re logic makes no sense, but when they come to disrupt, which is what they do, we should fight back.

It depends on their intent, doesn’t it?

They intend to troll, should we let them?

They have no intention of compromising, at the very least one must be realistic.

There was no bargaining with Hitler, either.

(Which isn’t a comparison, just a mindset, part of a losing strategy (”NO COMPROMISE!) Yeah, tell the Japanese after two atomic bombs… Why do people still think democrats, or Americans, are dumb? Fighting for peace is not the same as being a pu$$ie.)

Comment by simon, too | 2008-04-30 12:40:12

Their, sorry, and to continue with the last thought there, war changes, war tactics change, they emerge…

 

Comment by Garlic-Nosed Guitarist | 2008-04-30 13:10:08

You have to balance fighting back with not over-feeding them in my opinion. I was not trying to imply appeasement. Judicial use of energy is always in order.

 
 
 

Comment by simon, too | 2008-04-30 12:30:41

As Americans, we really don’t understand the power this country has, due to it’s resources, it’s intellect, and it’s abilities.

Bush almost unilaterally decided to take out Iraq, and did, Iran is threatened, daily, by Cheney’s kooks.

It’s like being married to an abusive husband, or being a boy, physically bullies in high school, I would suppose, you never know when the kook is gonna blow and clean your clock.

Whereas under a sane administration, whether Ford, say, or Clinton, (republican or democrat) America is seen, I would suppose, as the stable ally, the one who will protect the others from the crazies, all things being equal, who will work out solutions without resorting to violence as a first, thoughtless line of defense. Our enemies know how to play our stupid leaders.

Bullying is strategically weak, though bullies don’t understand.

It will be a relief to have a SANE president in the white house again, barring Obama’s election.

And I haven’t really spent enough time watching McCain, yet, to make a judgement there.

I don’t slander people simply because they re republicans, overall, it’s rude, unproductive, disrespectful, and bad strategy.

I will if he’s a corrupt nut, though.

Comment by B-Rob | 2008-04-30 13:25:58

Bush almost unilaterally decided to take out Iraq

Er, no. He got congressional authority first. Remember? And do I need to remind you the name of a certain Senator who voted “yes” on giving that authority? The same woman who talks about “completely obliterating” Iran! You think she would be “sane”, but Obama not? OK.

DSM IV-TR 297.1

Comment by ginaswo | 2008-04-30 16:09:57

are you a psychiatrist then citing dxs from the DSM?

 

Comment by ces | 2008-04-30 17:18:30

DSM IV-TR 297.1: Blob’s new call sign.

Project much?

 
 
 

Comment by vbonnaire | 2008-04-30 12:40:40

no, I meant the link I posted was way more conservative conservative! I love NQ. I feel I know the “voices” that are here as if they are friends! I think I am a liberal Green Democrat. But what Californians call this is not what O represents? The Repubs might want to call us progressive, but to me that means Peace Corps stuff, feed and house the poor, (but right now, U. S. first) we have to! –and work on Green Energy and Solar, no nukes that sort of “progressive”
70’s values…sort of thing. Just basic stuff!

LOL! I think the people here are like that too…that is why it feels very comfortable here!

Comment by simon, too | 2008-04-30 12:45:38

yeah, but you gave us a chance to discuss what it is to be American, there has been so much intolerance, it’s nice to know you can still like someone, be tolerant, consider their point of view, disagree, but still strive to do what is right, for the country, first.

So thanks.

Comment by vbonnaire | 2008-04-30 13:24:11

I bring things here, because of the minds here that know more than I do. I feel like if I see a red flag issue, Larry or someone who knows more about it than I will look into it further. I think that the people writing the editorials here are very, very intelligent, as is the audience. Anyway, I have no problems being bi-partisan in terms of reading what people are thinking about what they are seeing happen especially if it looks like 1930 all over again. What I’m worried about is Fascism, due to Nationalism in any form. We are Americans, and I believe if we ever see that, we will act to stop it. We have to, as part of our creedo. Also, we were loved once, by the world. I want that time back, soon. Go, Hillary…win! and get to work on putting us back where we belong…where we all get along!

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-04-30 12:22:01

Commenting now (will scroll back later)

YIPPEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!

And I saw that Kooky video the other day and was humming that tune for EVER!!! hahaha!

Hysterical! Love it!

LOVE the GOOD NEWS FOR OUR SIDE TOO!
Thanks Uppity, Larry, everyone, for keeping me up to speed!

 

Comment by sonia | 2008-04-30 12:26:28

rep lois capps switched her support to ,,OBAMA TODAY

SHE IS IN CA( hill won ca)
i am in ca,,,,

so i called her and gave her the sh,,,t she deserves

here is the number ,,Phone: (202) 225-3601daniel will pick up

everyone call this 70yr white b,,,

Comment by B-Rob | 2008-04-30 12:29:24

HA HA HA HA HA HA!

So much for “all the hate coming from the Obama people”!

Comment by simon, too | 2008-04-30 12:34:20

No, I would suppose, given Obama’s tactics, there is a kickback involved.

Again, bad news days, well, trot out a paid for superdelegate.

You see, Obama PAYS for his support, people, good strong people who win, can’t be enticed to his side, no matter the sum.

And it shows, doesn’t it?

Comment by B-Rob | 2008-04-30 13:04:29

Keep telling yourself that.

Wonder why, no matter what happens, the supers still keep endorsing Obama over Hill? I guess Rev. Wright or no Rev. Wright, they still understand that Obama is STILL MORE ELECTABLE than the Warrior Queen of Tuzla!

Scoreboard!

Comment by Peter | 2008-04-30 13:19:52

Sorry, I usually just lurk, but you’re too funny to pass up. The only reason a superdee would support Obama, would be because they are too chickensh!t to take back the White House in such challenging times. He is electable because of ‘you know what’ for the primary only. He absolutely is not electable for the GE. You are so scared it is pathetic. If any Obama followers were sure he had the nomination, you’d be out living your lives until it was time to cast your ballot in November. All of you are as much frigging pus/pan/woosies as the 90 lb weakling you support.

I said many months ago… I thought there was a good chance we would have a woman in the White House, I just didn’t realize it was going to be Obama. His display of ’sensitivity’ (waaaa) over Wright was just another demonstration of how weak his is.

You have apparently ‘won’, unhook the kool-aid IV, go outside and get some air and stop with the hand wringing, whinging and whining.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Kefa | 2008-04-30 12:28:02

Mr Press…..I’ll see your Bosnia…..and raise Mr.Wright. We will see what the public thinks.

 

Comment by pm317 | 2008-04-30 12:30:49

What else is going on in the world? (I have a new story coming up that should cause some shockwaves in Barry’s world.)

Can’t wait!

Comment by beebop | 2008-04-30 12:57:24

Hopefully he’s changed his diaper since yesterday!

 
 

Comment by beebop | 2008-04-30 12:31:30

http://nicedeb.wordpress.com/2008/04/28/obama-and-ayers-relationship-predates-woods-fund-board-memberships/

Ayers recommended Obama for a position with a board he created called The Annenberg Challenge?

How crazy is this guy to just lie, lie, lie?

Barack Obama has a new entanglement with unrepentant Weatherman Bill Ayers which I detail below. The gist is this - back in the mid-90’s Bill Ayers was instrumental in the creation and early operation of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, an effort committed to the reform of Chicago’s public schools. Barack Obama was Chairman of the Board of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, which suggests he worked closely with Ayers for several years.

Comment by beebop | 2008-04-30 12:37:13

 
 

Comment by politicsIsdirty | 2008-04-30 12:31:41

Great video !!!

How about another video in “bitter” controversy.

Comment by B-Rob | 2008-04-30 13:09:53

Yeah, need to resurrect that one!

 
 

Comment by Bud White | 2008-04-30 12:44:58

This is off-topic, friendly reminder to donate to Hillary TODAY!!!

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/contribute/GSYS

 

Comment by typical.white.person | 2008-04-30 13:04:27

I heard David Shuster (MSNBC - said Chelsea Clinton was “pimping”) on Air America today.

Was he finally fired by MSNBC, or is he doing double duty?

Comment by Jeff | 2008-04-30 13:11:11

“Was he finally fired by MSNBC, or is he doing double duty?”

He is doing double-duty–he’s been back on MSNBC for weeks.

 

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-04-30 13:28:00

A friend of mine on line earlier told me he was filling in for that nasty pasty faced Ed Schultz (he reminds me of Sgt Schultz and just as dim-witted)

 
 

Comment by B-Rob | 2008-04-30 13:17:24

Two more superdelegates came out for Obama today! The odds of Hillary surviving just got a little longer . . . .

Comment by Bud White | 2008-04-30 13:21:22

Two more superdelegates for Hillary today. The odds of BO surviving past May 6 just got longer.

Comment by Garlic-Nosed Guitarist | 2008-04-30 13:25:05

If we see a massive defection to Hillary under way, you think Dean will be keep demanding the remaining SDs decide right away? :)

 
 
 

Comment by sonia | 2008-04-30 13:21:06

Obama is going to have to take Imodium AD after the new polls

——————————————————————————–

Gallup - Hillary vs obama hillary + 1
Rasmussen - hillary vs obama Obama +4, but down -4 in 1 day
Survey Usa - North Carolina Obama +5, down -4
PPD - Indiana Hillary + 9
Survey Usa - Indiana Hillary +8

Rasmussen - mccain vs obama +1 mccain
Gallup - Mccain vs obama +2 mccain
RCP Avg Mccain vs Obama obama +1

Rasmussen - Hillary vs mccain tied
Gallup - Hillary vs mcain hillary +2
RCP Avg Hillary vs mccain +3.3 hillary

AP Ipsos Hillary has a 9 point national lead over mccain, obama only has a 2 pointlead.

This guys numbers have fallen dramatically since pennsylvania

 

Comment by Garlic-Nosed Guitarist | 2008-04-30 13:21:21

The trolls as usual and on purpose when something powerful is pointed out (The video and the MSM coverage of it) don’t address directly the topic at hand. And its not the video that is most important, its the coverage it is getting and the overall momentum switch (the real “scoreboard” that counts in this race) towards Hillary and away from Obama. Quote as many polls as you want, I have my own mind and this is the reality I see via my own truth discernment skills.

 

Comment by Bud White | 2008-04-30 13:26:00

Too bad Obama denounced Wright. Now I can’t play buzz word bingo on the Obamablogs when they say to put Wright’s words in “context.” You know, the context where calling our great nation the US of KKA is acceptable - snark.

Comment by Garlic-Nosed Guitarist | 2008-04-30 13:29:36

I’m sure you will find a way to keep reminding them. :) Its fair game, since they don’t mind harping on Bosnia forever.

 
 

Comment by B-Rob | 2008-04-30 13:27:59

Since Pennsylvania, Obama has gained nine supers to Hillary’s four . . . three of Obama’s coming in the last two days! Yes folks, the tide IS turning. Unfortunately, for you, not in the direction you expected.

Comment by Garlic-Nosed Guitarist | 2008-04-30 13:34:26

The game is far from over. And as someone who loves scoreboards surely you realize having a 14-10 lead at the end of the third quarter does not mean a win at the end of the game.

Comment by B-Rob | 2008-04-30 13:40:53

Well, of course you are right! It is not over until it is over. But you are talking about the middle of the fourth quarter and Obama has the lead, he has the ball, he has a strong running game, and is also completing passes. You guys have to blitz every down to try to create more pressure . . . but that just makes you susceptible to quick hitters up the middle. Which is what just happened today!

Question: even with what happened on Monday at the Nat. Press Club, why do you think Hillary is even further behind than she was before?

Comment by Garlic-Nosed Guitarist | 2008-04-30 14:02:11

I don’t think “Hillary is even further behind than she was before” so I can’t answer. I am measuring the lead by momentum and by how I discern said momentum. Clearly you and I view things differently.

Obama has had a bad week by how I look that things. How it plays out in the end on the final scoreboard is what counts and we’ll see. How you look at things may lead you to believe he had a better week or even a good week based on numbers you find. But I would disagree with that viewpoint en total.

There’s an ebb and flow to elections and I am trying to look at the big curve on the graph as best as I am able. Once again we’ll see what happens.

 
 
 

Comment by it'snotme | 2008-04-30 13:50:49

Since PA., Mr. Hope has plummeted in the polls. Hillary picked up 2 SDs yesterday and 1 PA SD today. Unfortunately for you, not the direction you expected.

Obama is toast.

 
 

Comment by B-Rob | 2008-04-30 13:36:24