RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Hannity on Obama’s Flag-Stomping Boss and Benefactor

Because we are so pleased that a MAJOR news outlet like Fox News is covering this story — and very well, I might add — we forgive Sean Hannity for claiming the color photo is an “exclusive” even though it was our very own Patrick Henry who discovered and sent the photo to Larry and me yesterday.

We posted the photograph, along with perspectives on Mr. Ayers and his relationship to Barack Obama here in our story:

“His Country Beneath His Feet, A Terrorist Holds Fast His Violent Visions (With Comment from Larry).”

ADDITIONALLY, Larry had already published a black-and-white version of the same photograph, scanned from a book, in this post on SATURDAY: “Stomp on This?

NOW we await some MSM coverage of Greta Van Susteran’s superb two-part interview of John Murtagh who, at age 9, was nearly burned to death by William Ayers and his wife Bernardine Dorhn:

Greta Van Susteran, John Murtagh and I Have Some Questions:” (and do NOT miss the two videos there if you’ve not seen them)

:::::::::::

What is behind all of this? Why, to Barack Obama it’s all about “The Game of Expedience.”

:::::::::::::

THEN there is THIS essential reading by Larry Johnson:

Why is Obama Hiding the Truth About William Ayers? Follow the Money

::::::::::::::

Special thanks to V, who also created a YouTube channel for No Quarter!

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post48 Comments »

Comment by Lyn | 2008-05-06 10:21:54

I wish people would quit saying their kids go to the same school. since that is a proven lie. They SHOULD say Axelrod lied and said their kids go to school together but since Obama’s kids are 6 and 9 and Ayers are 27 ish and 30. This is just another one of the proven lies the Obama camp puts out that reporters just repeat and can’t even be botherred to google. I found out Ayers kids ages, in the same NYtime article that came out on 9/11, it is just a couple paragraphs below the we didn’t do enough quote, if I am remember right, They are talking about how they are middle age, facing empty nest because their kids are in college ect

 

Comment by secularhumanizinevoluter | 2008-05-06 10:27:04

THIS IS TOOOOOO FUNNY! The moron Combs says “dosen’t Senator barrak Obama have his own record, his own legeslation his own….” Well the answer dipshit is NO. Did you get that? Let me say it slowely for ya N-O!!! And whoever the pathetic “Dem supporter of obamalamadingdong…HOW THE FUCK IS THIS CLOWN EVEN IN THE RUNNING!?! And I mean for DOGCATCHER, not EVEN President of The United States?!? Just when you tell yourself it CAN’T get any weirder BAM another obamalosion goes off! I LOVE POLITICS! Never ending entertainment so fuckin BIZARO screen writers could NEVER EVEN COME CLOSE!!!

Comment by Catriley | 2008-05-06 11:14:19

Don’t forget that Colmes actually inserted “his books” in that sentence. Yeah.. his books. WTF? Colmes also tries to dimiss it as “neighbors” and “maybe someone he had dinner with once”, while totally disregarding all of the other ties between them. Colmes is so useless.

 
 

Comment by Zee | 2008-05-06 10:29:28

I was disappointed in this coverage. It doesn’t even touch the most important part of the story: Obama got his start from a fundraiser held at Ayers’ house, he worked with Ayers, and he LIED about the extent of the relationship!

 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-06 10:29:55

Great Post…..Congratulations to NQ for continuing to inform the American Public…..Obama is responsible for HIS POLITICAL FAMILY……
AYERS…..CRAZY CRACKER MOFO ANARCHST STILL ON BAD ACID…..
WRIGHT…..CRAZY FASCIST PREACHER DEMAGOGUE OBAMAS AYATOLLAH…..
REZKO……INDICTED POLITICAL FIXER WITH TIES TO MIDDLE EAST MONEYMEN…..

TO NAME A FEW……
VERITAS…VOS….LIBERABIT…..
( The Truth Shall Set You Free…)

 

Comment by Leisa | 2008-05-06 10:30:37

I am amused that Liz Chadderdon is saying that there is media bias now that Obama is getting more scrutiny. This should have happened months ago. This is called vetting, not media bias.

I do not think the media is piling on him and rushing to report anything negative they can find.

I do not think I could bear to hear him whine if he becomes the nominee and the scrutiny comes out for real… I think the problems with Obama are withheld from the MSM so they can be used to a greater effect if he gets the nomination.

FOX did not bring up how half of the story in regard to his ties with Ayers. I felt like they are holding back…

Comment by v4hill | 2008-05-06 10:39:23

Liz Chaddderdon? The Obama shill, who tells us she’s up on politics, and has never heard of this story before? Did she miss the debate in Philly and the subsequent uproar from the Obamabots? WTF?

She kind of reminds me of the local Texas official/Obama surrogate that Chris Matthews nailed because he couldn’t name even one accomplishment by Obama.

Obama continues to attract the sheeple.

Comment by Catriley | 2008-05-06 11:22:18

Liz Chadderdon made me think that anyone could call themselves a “political strategist.” How could she honestly say she’d never heard of this before? Apparently you can be a political strategist and never actually look at any political sites on the internet?

I remember meeting a “political strategist” that was working for Andrea Seastrand, against Rep. Walter Capps, in California. The strategist was an interesting guy, very slick. I asked about his background and he told me point blank that anyone could call themselves a strategist and get work. I had a background in TV and an interest in politics, he’d encouraged me to print up some cards and go for it.

So.. I’m thinking the term “political strategist” is a rather loose one. Cuz.. Liz Chadderdon was about as lame as you could get.

 
 

Comment by scott | 2008-05-06 10:47:25

“FOX did not bring up how half of the story in regard to his ties with Ayers. I felt like they are holding back…”

Of course they are holding back the want him to get the OFFICIAL nomination before unloading on him to secure POTUS for McCAIN.

Every one of us has emailed Hannity with the full story as we know it regarding Barky and Ayers. And all they say is their friendly.

Remember FOX is a right wing new agency the only reason they are covering this is that they hate all Dems equally. As soon as its between us and them the will be all over us like white on rice.

 
 

Comment by JoeySky | 2008-05-06 10:41:47

Liz Chadderdon said she never heard about this before. It make me wonder how much more she doesn’t know about her man.

 

Comment by pm317 | 2008-05-06 10:43:25

That dem strategist (whatever that means) is a joke. She says she is a politically learned person — and then she had not heard of this story until she came on that show. Who the hell is she kidding? (Do some googling for a change before you advise clients of strategy.) What is wrong with these people?

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-06 11:53:49

LOL….She is so politically learned she avoids the internet altogether….
Smart for a party strategist…..OH BROTHER !……

 
 

Comment by llamajockey | 2008-05-06 10:44:08

You can not “contextualize” this sort of crazy and win an election. I don’t care if you have an ivy league PHD . It can not be done.

No matter what happens today in North Carolina or Indiana today, Obama will be radioactive by the end of the month. Almost every down ticket Democratic candidate from Senator and Governor to school board by convention time will be demanding that he remove himself for consideration as the party’s nominee. Still I pray NC grants us a miracle and it is all over for Obama today.

I have never been a Hillary supporter. But I am a Democrat. Unless Obama supporters are willing to make a credible case for the drafting of an alternative candidate like Edwards or Al Gore, than we must all act like responsible adults and support Hillary with all our might.

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-06 11:24:34

Al Gore is on NPR : Fresh Air Terry Gross
He is discussing his book The Assualt on Reason…..For those that are interested…..
What he says about how deceptive Bush was about Iraq explains why the Senate voted the way it did…..Helps Clinton……

 
 

Comment by usedmeat | 2008-05-06 10:46:57

It’s not like this stuff on Obama is recently unearthed.
It’s been there all along but I think the Old Media didn’t touch on it until the Hillary campaign was circling the drain for two reasons. One to turn the Democratic primary into a horse race again for ratings. Secondly to put Clinton out of the race then skunk Obama in the GE so McCain wins. .

 

Comment by secularhumanizinevoluter | 2008-05-06 10:50:09

Over at raw story they’re starting to sound a little worried Hillary’s gonna do it!

 

Comment by Tom Maguire | 2008-05-06 10:51:23

For lots more links and background on Ayers, Obama, and the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, this post is useful. (FWIW, critics have noted that the LJ post asserts correctly but without evidence that Obama was involved with the Chicago Annenberg Challenge).

 

Comment by llamajockey | 2008-05-06 10:57:12

Just wait until somebody finds photos of the Obamas together with Ayers/Dohrn in a professional or social setting.

Then if Obama still gets the nomination the easiest job on the planet will be McCain’s campaign chairperson.

McCain could spend all summer and fall sitting on his front porch sharing mint juleps with the media except for an afternoon press conference where he answers a few softball questions, makes a few pronouncements and holds up pictures of himself as a Navy pilot and POW vs Barack Obama and the flag stomping Ayers.

Ayers & Dohrn are the proverbial “dead girl & live boy”

Comment by Untilthelastdogdies | 2008-05-06 11:38:42

Then if Obama still gets the nomination the easiest job on the planet will be McCain’s campaign chairperson

LOL! I actually thought that about Donna Brazile when she managed Gore’s 2000 campaign against W.

Speaking of which, I haven’t seen her much this week…wonder what she’s up to…planning the Rules Committee meeting at the end of the month??

 
 

Comment by Mel | 2008-05-06 10:58:30

Oh fuck vote for Obama, he gives good speeches!

Forget doing research on the person you support who will impact your daily lives and forget:

He wrote a book of lies.
He lies about his inner city work.
He lies about how he was raised.
He lied about Rezko continually.
He lied about NAFTA continually.
He lies continually about his legislation.
He lies about his position at U of C.
He lies about his type of law practice.
He lies about Rev Wright.
He lies about Bill Ayers.
He lies about his being transparent.
He lies about his State schedules.
He lies about his experience.

But vote for him anyway, he gave a good speech and deserves to be POTUS because Michelle says so, the media wants us to believe so and Tim Russert has not had an erection like this in years!

Comment by Garlic-Nosed Guitarist | 2008-05-06 11:06:17

Obama is the Viagra of the masses? :)

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-06 11:26:31

An Overdose or Long Term Usage of Viagra leads to Blindness…..
amongst other things…..

 
 
 

Comment by Strawberrybitch | 2008-05-06 11:00:43

Larry, if you are reading…(sorry I’m still sort of stunned someone like Obama can get this close to the White House without someone noticing) but anyhow, there are quite a few of us reading right now, who’ve had to have background checks in order to get government jobs. From every little PFC to folks like you, working for the CIA. And I just have to ask, wouldn’t something like this disqualify you from getting hired, let alone get a security clearance? Hell, my husband damn near lost his Top secret clearance just because we fell behind on a credit card. But yet, it’s OK for a known and unrepentant terrorist to raise money for you? I have a headache in my eye.

Comment by rwc | 2008-05-06 11:49:44

I do know that for higher level clearances Barry’s associates would be cause for denial.

The only way he could get a clearance was for his senate buddies like Lieberman or Reid to pressure DISCO into overlooking his nefarious associates.

Of course the other possibility is that he doesn’t have a clearance which I suspect is the case. Why? because any thorough background check would have uncovered a truck load of dirt on Barry which could leaked out and be used against him in a presidential run.

And maybe that lack of a clearance is the reason he’s never visited NATO or held meetings of his committee.

He can’t because he’s a security risk.

 
 

Comment by sandyR | 2008-05-06 11:04:09

It just dawned on me this morning that Obama is a terrorist. (I suppose it has dawned on others far before me.) The old “birds of a feather flock together.” Of course such sayings aren’t always true.. but in this case…
Everyone (not everyone, but) has been saying that it isn’t that Obama shares these beliefs, etc.,etc…
But that it’s a question of his judgement in having any kind of relationship with them at all.
Now I think I will just sidestep the issue of whatever ideologies might be kicking around out there, and focus instead on method.
Terrorism is defined in my OED (abridged) as:
the unoffical or unauthorized use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.
And terror: from L terror. Terrerre “frightener.”
It is the mindset of what is appropriate behavior that I think Obama shares with Wright, Ayers, Dohrn..etc. It is the belief of what connotes
“appropriate behavior.” Dohrn, and company clearly believe appropriate behavior includes bombing, murder, intimidation, all violence.
Obama (and must we still say “campaign” or “supporters” when we point out bad behavior? Because I think I’m just gonna lay it all at Obama’s doorstep where it belongs) is using intimidation and violence.
The behavior at the caucases by Obama’s squad. The disallowing of democracy through threats and intimidation, “if Michigan and Florida are counted there will be violence in the streets.” If Obama doesn’t get the nomination there will be violent
uprising in Denver.
This is the calculated mechanizations of a domestic terrorist. Death threats to Clinton supporters, attempted destruction of carreers to those who oppose Obama. All orchestrated, all set in motion
with unity at the drop of a hat.
This is organized domestic terrorism.
Obama is a terrorist. And that’s why he sees no problems in hanging out with Ayers. They are kindred spirits.


You guys have done amazing work on Ayers. Thank you.

Comment by Strawberrybitch | 2008-05-06 11:16:58

Sandy, ya know, maybe it’s the Vicodin and a very active imagination, but sometimes I think Obama is part of a larger plan by the right to insure a permanent right wing majority by electing the scariest left wing nut job, and having him take the fall for the economy, Iraq, etc. Then impeach him over stuff like Ayers. Thus insuring democrats be the permanent minority for decades to come. But hey, what do I know, I’m just a typical, white house wife.

Comment by Salo | 2008-05-06 11:22:16

Nah.

the worst that he represents is a rebranding of America as a non-racist imperial power.

 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-06 11:31:07

It is the STATED GOAL of The Republican Party to obtain a PERMANENT MAJORITY IN BOTH HOUSES OF CONGRESS……
You are not paranoid…..How is this to be acomplished ?
One strategy can be studied by examining the JERRYMANDERING of congressional districts in TEXAS…..

REPUBLICANS THINK IN ERAS….

 

Comment by rwc | 2008-05-06 12:15:56

The GOP isn’t that bright.

Never underestimate the Democratic party propensity for self-destruction.

The thing is the Democratic party has been grooming Obama for president since his speech at the convention. He’s was their politically correct multicultural champion and GOP slayer all in one content free telegenic package.

The Democratic Ronald Reagan.

And it almost worked. It failed because the party bosses were too much into identity politics and political correctness and didn’t checkout Barry the way they should have. They incorrectly assumed that voters would overlook Barry’s many character flaws and nefarious associates because he is half-black and for fear of the racism card.

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-06 12:34:59

RWC….all I can say is to suggest the research….What the GOP was not able to accomplish in DC…they did in Texas….check it out….

Comment by rwc | 2008-05-06 16:30:06

Ohh I do believe you that the GOP is playing very dirty and won’t hesitate to steal the election if they can.

Like voting in Democratic open primaries for Obama.

 
 
 
 

Comment by Jeff | 2008-05-06 13:03:13

“It just dawned on me this morning that Obama is a terrorist.”

If you find yourself writing statements like “Obama is a terrorist”, you need to back off, get some R&R, and up the prescription.

Folks, if this is what happens to you under the pressure of a tough primary season, where you suddenly decide your opponents aren’t just political opponents, don’t just have different ideas that you don’t agree with, but that they are actually “terrorists”, then politics isn’t for you. Some feudal or tribal society where disputes are dealt with violently perhaps, but not a functioning democracy.

Rev. Wright’s labelling of American military actions as “terrorism” has been rightly (and universally) decried on this site. The same should be done to people who take their language like this one gigantic, incendiary leap too far, just like Rev. Wright.

 
 

Comment by scott | 2008-05-06 11:06:18

I know a lot of us want Larry and Susan to moderate some of the troll but I could NOT believe what CNN has posted as a comment on a story today.

“RON
May 6th, 2008 9:15 am ET

cnn does not like OBAMA

BUT we will burn down the studios in atlanta…. mark my words”

Real nice.

Comment by John | 2008-05-06 12:25:46

I saw that, but was on my way to class so I didnt have time to cut and paste. Thank you.

And that post was not a stand-alone. There were many, many others just as stupid and vicious.

Most of them just bleat talking points they’ve heard on tv and Air Obama radio- “the math doesnt’ favor Hillary…” “nobody voted in Michigan and Florida…” “Obama has an insurmountable lead in pledged delegates so the remaining contests dont matter…” “Why won’t Hillary drop out…” blah blah blah.

Worthless crap from worthless sheep.

 
 

Comment by Talktruth | 2008-05-06 11:06:47

FOX News will turn on us with teeth and claws bared once Senator Clinton gets the nomination, but for right now, I grateful that somebody is covering the Ayers story to some extent. Sean has definitely talked about BO kicking off his state senate campaign at Ayers house, etc. I listen most every night at 9:00. But you’re right, they didn’t go into every detail last night.

 

Comment by Catriley | 2008-05-06 11:29:00

I think the mistake Hannity and others are making (though I TOTALLY appreciate coverage of this story) is that it should be couched in the terms of electability. It was briefly touched on by Colmes (the most ineffectual person on TV), but that is the most important aspect of all this.

Could Obama beat a former POW Senator in a General Election with these associations and questionable ties? Obama is getting softballs tossed at him right now, but the Super Delegates and the undecideds who actually CARE if the republicans keep the White House, should ask themselves how this is going to play in the GE???

We cannot CHANCE that Obama would overcome that stuff. We’re getting a sneak preview of what’s to come for him in the media and with the GOP. Thinking people would never vote for him.

ANd my god.. if that Liz Chadderdon person is an example of the “LEARNED” people that support him, he’s absolutely toast against McCain. (and how embarrassing elitist to use the term “learned” in conversation. Methinks shethinks far too much of herself, and then proved that she didn’t know what the hell was going on.

Comment by pm317 | 2008-05-06 12:34:32

Hannity won’t make the case for electability or frame these issues as such. At least he is providing the SDs and the party elites and ordinary voters alike the information that will help. If they don’t see, it is at their own peril.

 
 

Comment by owl06 | 2008-05-06 12:42:15

If he’s the nominee McCain will run away with it.

 

Comment by Heidi | 2008-05-06 12:48:59

I actually read somewhere that Michelle Obama worked at Sidley law firm in Chicago and Bernadine Dorhn also worked there at the same time. Barack Obama later joined the same firm. Has anyone else heard that?

Comment by Jeff | 2008-05-06 13:11:11

“I actually read somewhere that Michelle Obama worked at Sidley law firm in Chicago and Bernadine Dorhn also worked there at the same time. Barack Obama later joined the same firm. Has anyone else heard that?”

Has anyone heard that Hillary Clinton worked for a communist law firm in the 1970’s? Oh wait, I’m not supposed to mention that…

 
 

Comment by Patrick Henry | 2008-05-06 12:54:54

 

Comment by hillarybotsandobamabotsindistinguishable | 2008-05-06 14:05:00

I heard that in his youth Obama once ate in a restaurant that Charles manson had eaten in two days earlier.

Coincidence? I think not.

 

Comment by Pagan Power | 2008-05-06 14:31:04

After watching this video and this Liz Chadderdon person I think that the Cult has some certain side effects on people, namely their inablity to remember anything at all that may be considered damaging in any way to Obama. It may be a side effect created by Obama’s worship of Ronald I Don’t Recall Reagan. And it filters down through the Collective Cult because it is Obama’s personal disease. It surely explains how Obama with those immense ears was unable to hear his pastor say all those horrible things.

 

Comment by Pagan Power | 2008-05-06 14:31:38

After watching this video and this Liz Chadderdon person I think that the Cult has some certain side effects on people, namely their inability to remember anything at all that may be considered damaging in any way to Obama. It may be a side effect created by Obama’s worship of Ronald I Don’t Recall Reagan. And it filters down through the Collective Cult because it is Obama’s personal disease. It surely explains how Obama with those immense ears was unable to hear his pastor say all those horrible things.

 

Comment by hillarybotsandobamabotsindistinguishable | 2008-05-06 14:41:29

I heard that Obama once lived one town away from a town with an Audi dealership.

That makes him an elitist in my book.

 

Comment by yttik | 2008-05-06 17:28:01

Many people have fond memeories of the 60’s. Peace, love, lots of good drugs, LOL.

I do not have good memories, I remember violence and bloodshed. I remember cults, children being sexually abused, the Weathermen, and people praising the Manson murders. I remember a lot of insanity and no one at the helm.

Idealism without wisdom is deadly. Now I understand why I’m so opposed to Obama.

 

Comment by Tom Maguire | 2008-05-06 20:10:35

Just wait until somebody finds photos of the Obamas together with Ayers/Dohrn in a professional or social setting.

I can tell you a great place to look - based on a history of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge the announcement ceremony was a huge photo-op - Ambassador Annenberg’s daughter handed the mayor of Chicago a poster sized check for $49.2 million, presumably to flashing bulbs and the whir of videocameras.

SO, would the head of the group that led the grant proposal be in a photo with the newly annointed chairman? One might think so. But I can’t find a
photo in the Chi Trib or Sun archives.

The event was Jan 1995 at Washington Irving school in Chicago; maybe a society mag had photos; maybe the Annenberg foundation could be contacted.

 

Comment by Mitch | 2008-05-07 14:27:13

Mr O’Bama and Mr Ayers are two of a kind! These two males (they are not men)are Marxists plain and simple.

Keep up the good work Sean!

 

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
noq-adbutton1.gif