RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Just a Guy in Barack’s Neighborhood

Obama Ayers Dorhn

Barack Obama is running on his “judgment” and “integrity in government.” He tells us that Washington is broken, and he is the one who can fix it. But looking back at his fast rise up out of the slime of Chicago politics, one can legitimately question where he got the “creds” to fulfill what he professes.

Rev. Wright has probably used up most of his 15 minutes of fame. But why Obama chose to attend and financially support a church whose religious leader screeched anti-American diatribes remains unclear. However, far more telling about Obama’s character is his statement that he could no more disown Rev. Wright than he could disown the Black community, followed shortly thereafter by tossing him into a ditch when Wright resurfaced spewing essentially the same old rants. What firm commitments would he make as President that are subsequently turned upside down? What impact would such 180 degree turnarounds have on our people or our country?

Tony Rezko, major fund-raiser and house hunting-purchasing companion remains on trial (as of this writing) for wire fraud, bribery, money laundering, and attempted extortion. But enough is out there to expose Rezko for lining his own pockets at the expense of the poor who lived in the slums of Obama’s state senate district.

Obama gave the estimated $250,000 bundled by Rezko to charity, but that doesn’t erase the relationship itself, nor does Obama’s characterization of the home-lot-buying caper as “boneheaded” expunge this bizarre transaction from the record. What other “boneheaded” decisions would Obama make as President, and what will the consequences be?

However, to me the relationship that will ensure that Obama could never win a general election is his complex business-political-friendship with Bill Ayers and wife, Bernadine Dohrn. These unrepentant home-grown terrorists of yesteryear, whose group planned and set off bombs at the Capital, Pentagon and other buildings resulting in several deaths, were instrumental in getting Obama’s career off the ground. [Note: Ayers was never tried for the crimes he has never denied committing, because of a violation in FBI surveillance tactics.] Obama is trying to discount his relationship with this couple as casual, but numerous reports suggest that it was otherwise.

Obama’s campaign excels at word-spinning, especially the art of the ambiguous. To wit is his answer to George Stephanopoulos’ questioning during the recent debate on ABC about the extent of the relationship, Obama replied: “This is a guy who lives in my neighborhood… He’s not somebody I exchange ideas with on a regular basis.” What is “regular?” It sure isn’t “never.” Upon reviewing their mutual involvements over many years, it is clear that Ayers and Dohrn are not just a couple who Obama waves to while out walking the dog.

Before I get labeled as a traitor to the Democratic Party by creating another cartoon that questions the judgment of the individual who could be our nominee for President, let me assure you that my single concern is wanting a Democrat to move into the White House in January of 2009. Obama says that Clinton has attacked him. Well, he hasn’t seen anything yet! The Republicans already think Christmas is coming in June.

When they run McCain on a national security theme, the Ayers relationship, in particular, will play out in ways that will devastate Obama’s candidacy. Republicans are unconcerned with the fact that Obama was only 8 years old when the bombs exploded. Images of that devastation, followed by highly disturbing images of 9/11, paired with the details of the relationship between the two men will be broadcast repeatedly into everyone’s living room. I don’t make this stuff up—it’s all out there already.

The only remaining question is, “Will the Super Delegates see the neon-bright writing on the wall in time?”

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post155 Comments »

Comment by american sawbuck | 2008-05-07 18:45:38

Finally First

Comment by requiemforadancer | 2008-05-07 19:29:01

I always try to stay in the back, myself.

 
 

Comment by AF catfish | 2008-05-07 18:45:40

The Ayers and Dhorn clothing is priceless. (Wonder if other readers won’t know who the guy on the left and woman on the right are?)

 

Comment by victim.of.violence.of.obama.supporters | 2008-05-07 18:48:49

the behavior of violent obama supporters leads me to believe that they enjoy his deep and lasting lies with terrorists.

Comment by John | 2008-05-07 19:49:42

I can’t believe anyone with half a brain reads any of this. What tripe.

Comment by victim.of.violence.of.obama.supporters | 2008-05-07 20:01:19

it is true. all obama supporters are vicious and violent, and they will do anything in order to ensure that their messiah hussein is elected to the presidency. they enjoy his affiliations with reverend wright, louis farrakhan, odinga, who has slaughtered christians, and ayers, the terrorist who bombed the pentagon. motivated by rage and by impulse, obama supporters are low information terrorists who harass supporters of other candidates.

and just observe their behaviour on the blogs and in the field. they tear clinton signs, throw objects at clinton supporters, write hate mail to clinton supporters and even attempt to have clinton supporters fired from their jobs.

these terrorist supporters convinced this democrat to vote against obama in the general election.

Comment by requiemforadancer | 2008-05-07 20:13:49

As hyperbolic as this sounds, it’s true.

So, should we minimize it, or wait, until it develops into further violence?

What do you think, “john,” you have control, Axelrod has control?

That is simply a projection, now, isn’t it?

Looks like a bunch of amateurs in chaos.

Comment by emilyR | 2008-05-07 20:46:36

I like that “amateurs in chaos.” nicely put.

 
 
 

Comment by Uppity | 2008-05-07 20:09:17

You’re reading it.

Comment by hillarysmygirl | 2008-05-07 20:21:04

LOL! As usual, like Hillary, you’re smarter than the boys.

Comment by Nancy K | 2008-05-08 05:46:36

What does LOL mean?

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-08 06:25:13

Nancy…LOL = laugh out loud
LMAO = reduction in size of ass due to laughter….
RFLOL = Rolling on the floor laughing and may result in the reduction of ass size or spilled coffee or minor injury…Kay ?

 
 
 

Comment by scott | 2008-05-07 20:41:37

Uppity you are the best.

 
 

Comment by Prem | 2008-05-07 20:36:59

Go ahead, bury your head in the sand. It reminds me of Bush supporters in 2004—they just didn’t want to look at the glaring negatives and look what we got. So many Obama supporters just don’t want to admit that Obama has any negatives. The folks I talked to in Indiana when I phone-banked for Hillary said the Wright connection to Obama was a problem and they were not going to vote for him for that reason.

 

Comment by pm317 | 2008-05-07 21:24:59

 

Comment by JohnnyB | 2008-05-07 22:46:36

Wake up you kool-aid drinker, you have been bamboozled.

 
 

Comment by Bob Sakowski | 2008-05-07 20:07:25

Indeed. They do make Freepers seem civil.

Comment by Uppity | 2008-05-07 20:09:43

Just warming up.

 
 

Comment by Nancy K | 2008-05-08 05:43:35

I’ve heard Black pundits and politicians threaten uprisings worse than the 1968 Chicago riots, bloodshed, and even civil war if Obama is not the nominee. Black women on TV have said they have been ostracized and threatened by family and friends for supporting Hillary Clinton. Obama supporters have been threatening and intimidating in their speech and behavior, notably in blogs and at caucuses, while Obama rallies seem overtaken with mindless religious fervor. When Hillary attended the Black State of the Union meeting recently, Tavis Smiley had to talk his audience down and remind them that it’s wrong to threaten violence and that they should be polite to Hillary.
Obama is strongly supported by the New Black Panther Party which (I read) is more violent than the old Black Panther Party. I saw their website before it was taken down, and it was plastered with Obama worship. While the Obama campaign says Hillary “will do anything to get elected,” he seeks and accepts funds and support from even criminals and terrorists. He didn’t denounce/reject or otherwise dissociate himself from Rev. Wright, Antoin Rezko , Louis Farrakhan, William Ayers, Bernadine Dohrn, or The New (or old) Black Panther Party as long as it seemed these benefited his candidacy.
What should be of great concern to Obama’s supporters and others is that his loyalty seems to go as far as his personal self-interest. He has avoided being publicly associated with Black groups and leaders. A Saturday Night Live skit showed comically how he avoids associations with Black leaders (Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson). He didn’t even attend the State of the Black Union. And what did he do for the Blacks in New Orleans - not to mention the poor people living in Rezko Chicago slums without heat? Moreover, while Black voters threw Hillary and Bill Clinton under the bus to support a Black candidate who so far has done nothing substantial for them, Barack Obama did the same to Rev. Wright along with his White grandmother in order to court the White vote. WHAT WILL HE DO TO ISRAEL WHEN HE COURTS MUSLIM FAVOR?

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-08 06:06:39

LOGICA FALSA OBAMAS’ PHILOSOPHIAM TOTAM SUFFODIANT…..NO ?
( Faulty Logic Undermines Obamas’ Entire Philosophy…..No ? )

* Obama will bring down the DNC if given the nomination and will lose *

Comment by ChrisXP | 2008-05-08 07:08:06

* Obama will bring down the DNC if given the nomination and will lose *

After 2000 and 2004, a failure to win the presidency in 2008 it’s about time the DNC fails royally itself.

First time, shame on me. Second time, shame on you. Third time, better have the bums out by sunrise!

There’s party loyalty, then there’s blind obiedence that actually hurts the party itself. If the Dems can’t deliver in 2008, it’s time for new leadership, TOP down.

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-08 07:24:06

Well ChrisXP….There are some very effective Democrats that are not backing down to bullying by either Obama or the GOP….A vaccum is always dangerous….It leads to totalitarianism….The STATED REPUBLICAN GOAL IS TO ACHIEVE PERMANENT MAJORITIES IN BOTH HOUSES OF CONGRESS….
** I am thoroughly disgusted with much of the current party
leadership….Excepting Clinton….But I’m not a slash and burn extremist sort of person either ( except in my painting )….So I believe that those who are corrupt aand or incompetent should lose their office…..But I do Not ENJOY THE DEMISE OF MY PARTY….I LIVE IN TEXAS AND THE GOP ACHIEVED THEIR FASCIST WET DREAM HERE AND IT AINT’ PRETTY…..**
( Also…..I THINK YOUR ATTEMPT TO SHAME ME IS PRESUMPTUOUS )

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by AF catfish | 2008-05-07 18:48:51

What the Ayers issue highlights for me is not so much Obama’s already-known poor judgement, but the moral relativism of the left.

Can’t believe I’m referring to “the left” as “them” but sorry, I don’t care how intelligent Ayers is, he’s an ass. I can’t believe he has a teaching position at a university.

Comment by haypops | 2008-05-07 18:58:04

Well didn’t Obama get a teaching positon too?

Can someone name a worse Democratic Candidate in the last 25 years?

Comment by requiemforadancer | 2008-05-07 19:32:34

Look at dean, and his skewed judgement, and you understand where the Obama travesty is coming from, in part.

Trippi, who advised Dean on his 04 run, wrote a scathing article about Dean’s behavior, post election, in the Atlantic.

At the time, I thought it was unprofessional, given current circustances, it would probably prove very enlightening.

Comment by Nancy K | 2008-05-08 05:54:14

I’d like to read the Trippi article. Please give as much info as you can about where, date, etc. so I can find it. Thanks.

 
 

Comment by Uppity | 2008-05-07 20:10:23

John Kerry.

 

Comment by John McCutchen | 2008-05-07 21:02:50

The bitch he beat

Comment by beebop | 2008-05-07 21:05:50

Go take your viagra and hump your pillow.

Comment by SensibleWoman | 2008-05-07 22:35:27

ROFLOL! Oh-h-h-h-h-h-h-h, my! LOL! Now I can’t sleep…hehehe…the visions…eee-w-w-w-w-w

 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-08 06:28:48

His……ehemmm…Pillow…..is probably his best friend…..No ?
John you are a PETULANT PILLOW HUMPER…..chuckle/smirk…..

 
 
 

Comment by s. hall | 2008-05-08 02:11:29

hayhops — good question. There has never been a worse candidate for the Presidency then Barack Obama in my lifetime. I still remember when the parties vetted the candidates. He would have never gotten this far had their been any scrutiny.

Comment by Nancy K | 2008-05-08 05:59:27

Is it a fact that “vetting” potential presidential candidates is not practiced today as it was in the past or are you assuming the above because Obama should not or would not have been a candidate if he were properly vetted?

 
 
 

Comment by bert | 2008-05-07 19:02:06

There is the ‘left,’ AF catfish, and then there is the RADICAL left. I am left. You too probably. Ayres and Dohrn are 60’s RADICALS. Today we call such folks ‘terroists.’ There is a big difference.

Comment by MessyMarcy | 2008-05-07 20:51:44

True, but his point is well taken. Consider further the verbal attacks on women and the elderly that have come from what I call the ivory tower wing of the party. I previously had just considered them rather unrealistic, but I now stand corrected. They are just as bigoted as the ultra right — they just have different targets. I never thought I would see such hatred come from fellow Democrats. Heckuva job, Howie & Barack.

Comment by ChrisXP | 2008-05-08 07:26:53

Consider further the verbal attacks on women and the elderly that have come from what I call the ivory tower wing of the party.

And the disabled, who they feel is “dead weight” and expendable (the Terri Schivos of the world). Ever wonder why euthanasia is pressed h-a-r-d by this sub-group? They don’t want it to be a personal decision, but a State one decided by strangers with different values (so evident in Texas by giving doctors rights to kill patients by their expertise — ask how many folks who have been misdiagnosised how much they trust MDs on THAT decision!).

In other words they want to practice Eugenics on the scale that would be worse than Hilter’s “T4″ “euthanasia” campaign.

They put the State before the individual.

 
 
 

Comment by Linda | 2008-05-07 20:30:43

I think that Ayers comes from a wealthy background and “those” kind of people (like Bush) get privileges that ordinary people do not get. I wouldn’t be surprised if his family didn’t donate enough money to get him a job. Of course, Obama has benefitted because he was “useful” to Chicago movers and shakers.

Speaking of Chicago movers and shakers, what is Oprah up to these days. We haven’t heard from her much lately.

Comment by Nancy K | 2008-05-08 06:07:34

I noticed her disappearance also. I just read an article that said Oprah only took 2 years to understand that it was unwise to stay in Rev. Wright’s church. Do you think anyone believes that Obama didn’t know what Rev. Wright was preaching - for 20 years?

 
 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-08 06:16:50

IMHO….This is an intraparty fight between the New Democrats (centrists)
exemplified by The Clinton/Gore administrations and their current most prominent leader Sen. Hillary Clinton…..And the New Left ( Elite Liberal Power Brokers ) exemplified by Kennedy, Pelosi, Kerry et, al….
The New Left hd a stranglhold on the Democratic party until the Centrists came to prominence with the electon of Bill Clinton and Al Gore….
New Left = ID Politics…….Centrists = Focus on Economics as a way to achieve social policies….This is why the New Democrats are vilified by both the Left and the Right…..After all WHY ACHIEVE ANYTHING WHEN WE CAN SQUABBLE IN AN ENDLESS SHITSTORM OF VICTIMHOOD AND MORAL POSTURING ?

 
 

Comment by fiscalliberal | 2008-05-07 18:54:48

The media has buried the Ayhers and Dorn connection. However the swiftboaters will bring it out.

Does the Democratic Party not have the mechanism to detect these issues before the general election????

Comment by Patriotic Lion | 2008-05-07 20:12:16

Does the Democratic Party not have the mechanism to detect these issues before the general election????

The delegates know all about this. It is logical to assume Obama has not closed the deal because he can’t close the deal. The delegates are looking for cover so they can give the nod to Hillary. The delegates know all about Obama.

Check out my troll advisory for a clue:

Comment by Patriotic Lion | 2008-05-07 15:50:59

Troll advisory, and I am just making this up so nothing to be concerned about:

All the nefarious tactics by the Obama campaign have been compiled into a briefing document and dossier. Obama is being held responsible. Plausible deniability may protect Obama from legal sanctions, but the information has the power where it is needed: to convince the delegates Obama is a threat to national security and our very way of life.

The delegates have this document and it is being updated continually.

By the way, all those votes in Michigan and Florida do count where it counts: the delegates (and not you trolls) who will nominate Hillary.

Since Hillary is actually electable against McCain the nefarious stuff makes her case ab easy sell to the delegates. The delegates posturing you see in public is just that: delegates posturing.

I hope you sleep well tonight knowing that knucklehead you adore and idealize is being walked patiently out the door by a master politician: Hillary Clinton. Hillary still is in the race and pout all you want, she’s going the distance.

Worry for not though, I just made all of this up.

By the way, McGovern telling Hillary to bow out is laughable, considering how successful a “President” he turned out to be. :) Not to mention the D party nominating him.

Comment by alibe | 2008-05-07 20:26:38

Maybe McGovern is hoping that Obama will erase the legacy of McGovern as being the Democratic candidate who lost by the biggest margin.

Comment by Prem | 2008-05-07 20:41:04

That’s good! You’re probably right—how many states did McGovern lose–40? I wouldn’t take his advice at all!

Comment by scott | 2008-05-07 20:46:03

Comment by jwrjr | 2008-05-07 22:38:15

Sort of like taking campaign advice from Donna Brazile.

 
 

Comment by s. hall | 2008-05-08 02:20:25

I believe McGovern carried only one state and that was Massachusetts. Obama would lose Massachusetts to McCain.

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-08 06:33:20

I think that the immenent impeachment of Blagovitch prevents Obama from even carrying his home state of ILL…REZKO…AYERS….REZKO….AUCHI….ETC…..ad infinitum…
ad nauseum….

 
 
 

Comment by Patriotic Lion | 2008-05-07 20:41:15

 
 
 

Comment by AF catfish | 2008-05-07 20:35:41

The Democratic party, or the left, does not get why Ayers and Dhorn are offensive.

Look up Ira Einhorn. He was embraced by the academic elites because he was “brilliant.” He also killed his girlfriend and a lot of people knew it.

Comment by MessyMarcy | 2008-05-07 20:59:22

Good analogy. What was it Ayers himself said? “Guilty as sin, free as a bird.” When his ass was in a crack he didn’t seem too radical to use daddy’s money to be able to walk away without serving any time. I think our system of justice is better than in most countries, but it’s pitiful when sleaze like Ayers is walking around writing books and profiting from his murders, while elsewhere a young poor kid is serving a life sentence for doing nothing more than wearing a Metallica t-shirt.

 

Comment by rwc | 2008-05-07 22:52:57

You nailed it, and I might add why they don’t find Wright and Farrakhan offensive as well.

If they did find them offensive Mobama wouldn’t have made it past Iowa.

I really think large segments of the party especially its activist nutroots/move-on portion actually agree with Wright, Ayers and Farrakhan. Heaven knows I’ve read way too many excuses and outright apologetics from so-called “progressives” who aren’t the least bit enraged by Wrights comments or with Mobama friendship with Ayers. They were more outraged that people found it deeply disturbing.

The thing is if folks are the least bit upset over these sort of associations you have to wonder if these people don’t at some level agree with the Wrights of this world or bloody reign of terror by Ayers.

 
 

Comment by Nancy K | 2008-05-08 06:17:27

The most frightening thought is that IF WE KNOW, THEY KNOW and that “they” are actually intentionally helping the Republicans, the corporate media, the war profiteers, and whatever obscenely wealthy multi-national corporations, hedge funds, governments, etc. benefit from the downfall of the (old) Democratic Party.

 
 

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-05-07 19:04:28

Has anyone heard who Max Cleland has endorsed?

He is another of my heroes I would hate to take OFF my ever shortening list.

First Olberdouche came off
Then Schuster
I don’t know if I can bare to take yet another one off.

Does anyone know? Help an old lady out? ;-)

 

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-05-07 19:11:16

Another question - it may seem simplistic but I really am curious

Doesn’t the President of the US (whether legally elected or not) need to have a security clearance before obtaining the job?

Even me as a lowly Specialist in the Army had a Secret Clearance for my MOS (71Q71R).

Well, if I had friends like Barry they wouldn’t have even given me that!!

And there are a few levels above “Secret” (doh)

just saying - a Pretzeldent should be the TOP level and I don’t think he’ll pass the requirements. If given responsibly and NOT as “exception” due to Affirmative Action BS.

Comment by Melissa | 2008-05-07 19:47:04

I have been asking the same question. PLEASE can somebody (Larry???) give us an answer??? Hoe the hell can Obama get a basic security clearance, never mind the keys and codes to the “football.”

Comment by Nancy K | 2008-05-08 06:27:44

Remember Joe Wilson and Valerie Plame. Vice President Cheney and Karl Rove outed a CIA agent for political revenge and intimidation with no repercussions to Cheney and Rove. I think, sadly, in the US today - and maybe it was always so - laws, rules and regulations only apply to those at low levels of power.

 
 

Comment by Bob Sakowski | 2008-05-07 20:10:10

Comment by requiemforadancer | 2008-05-07 20:17:53

I think it is safe to assume a corrupt president does not get the run of the candy store.

Study history, and political opposition.

And I would suppose if the president, or his minions, were a serious security risk, it would be handled.

 
 
 

Comment by Pagan Power | 2008-05-07 19:18:41

Sensational colors on a splendid cartoon.

You are absolutely correct about Ayers and Dohrn. This isn’t a casual relationship. Even Assholerod admits that Obama and Ayers are friendly. I am sure it is just a little more than that. And of course not much is being said about Michelle’s friendship with Dohrn where this relationship actually began.

It really doesn’t matter that Obama was 8 when these two began their reign of terror bombing things. What does matter is that as an adult Obama chose to enter into a relationship with these terrorists. And I am also certain that Obama shares the core belief of the Weathermen, that whites are the enemy. It explains his association with Wright as well.

As Mark Rudd, one of the Weathermen founders said in his unpublished memoir:

At that point in our thinking, there were no innocent Americans. At least not among the white ones. All guilty. All Americans were legitimate targets for attack. I cherished my hate as a badge of moral superiority.

I highly recommend that everyone watch this video and all of the others in the series about the Weather Underground. These are the types of people that Barack Obama associates with. And please remember that these friends of Obama are unrepentant and both of them have not given up on the possibility of doing it again. It should put a chill in anyone that cares about the safety and security of our country.

Great work Pat!

Comment by pm317 | 2008-05-07 21:31:28

I agree. I like your Obama — very funny with the ears.

 

Comment by AF catfish | 2008-05-07 23:23:27

That quote is priceless.

 
 

Comment by PDMM | 2008-05-07 19:19:10

THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU!!

 

Comment by PDMM | 2008-05-07 19:19:10

THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU!!

 

Comment by PDMM | 2008-05-07 19:22:55

Well, part two, I was typing away and got published too soon! Yes, the Republicans think Christmas is coming in June… they have an embarrassment of riches in that war chest for BO and they must be just itching to dig in! If something like one incident, the swift-boat thing, could derail John Kerry, how in blazes does the Democratic party think BO can get through a GE?????

Why couldn’t IN have gone for Hillary big time?? I’m glad she’s not dropping out. You stay in Hillary and be a thorn in that man’s side for as long as you can!!!

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-05-07 19:28:25

They are “trippin”

Plain and simple

Time for the adults to put down their cafe o’lait and start explaining in simple english to the AA Community just what is ahead of them for the FALL and if they really want a DEM President or NOT?

R they really that stubborn and/or stupid that they would throw it all away??? I just can’t believe it.

Comment by requiemforadancer | 2008-05-07 19:39:21

A strong AA leader who would tell the truth would help, but these inculcated attitudes take time to unwind.

But really, anyone willing to tell the truth about Obama, and his corruption, and connections, would help the situation enormously, the pretentious brother stole money intended for the black community.

And those poor fishers, you know, you lie to smear, you still lose.

And you don’t get it.

Man, Obama is whipped, whipped, whipped, whipped.

Comment by victim.of.violence.of.obama.supporters | 2008-05-07 19:41:37

Large support from African-Americans who voted against their economic interests catapulted Obama to victory in NC. Here they are voting for someone whose putative blackness is manufactured by a white man named David Axelord, Obama’s campaign manager. Obama is the product of a white mother and an African man who visited the United States on a student visa: he was raised overseas and in Hawaii, and he never had to endure anything that resembles the African-American experience. Essentially a white man with African blood, Obama has no relationship to the African-American community. But they fell for the minstrel show in blackface put on by David Axelrod, John Kerry, Ted Kennedy, Nancy Pelosi, Howard Dean and other anti-Clinton elements in the Democratic Party. And what has Obama ever done for the African-American community? How has he ever improved their lives? The Clintons did, but I notice they are ungrateful. Motivated by impulse and by an emotional identification with the skin of a man to whom they have absolutely no relation, they voted for pigment and not for their economic interests. I must say I found it all both tragic and telling.

Comment by requiemforadancer | 2008-05-07 19:54:38

I get angry over his financial exploitation of poor people, AA’s included.

Really, the Ayers fund, and the Annenberg Challenge, where DID that money go, too?

And what about Wright, and Rezko?

It is unconscionable that as a black man, he steal from other AA’s, and then hypocritically calls himself an advocate.

I would think that Obama doesn’t like to be reminded by others he is black,(Aa’s or Anglos) I wonder what uppity thinks of this, she’s always good for insight…

Must be a breaking point, or something.

Comment by Kathy | 2008-05-08 05:41:39

Black people hate white people. After listening to Wright and some other AA pastors, I realize more and more that they really do hate us. I guess I can’t blame them when they are inundated with the kind of rhetoric Wright spouts every Sunday.

It certainly is not uplifting or forgiving, and it must inflame hatred for whites every Sunday. How do you get over that when you listen to it for 20 years. I don’t care if you are a Harvard graduate, itt must take its toll.

When I think of 90% of AAs voting for Obama, it also tells me they hate white people. Some of these AAs have to be educated and intelligent and yet they vote for him because he is black (knowing his history–even if only half of them know his history) or because the hate for us is so overwhelming they must vote for him.

Think about a McCain with the same church indoctrinations and the same associations as Obama. Would you vote for him? I sure wouldn’t but AAs will vote for an Obama with those religious indoctrinations and associations.
91% did in North Carolina.

This country is getting scary and we should do something before it gets out of hand.

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-08 06:50:01

Kathy…..It is my belief that Wright does not represent most AA churches or that his rhetoric represents most AA’s any more than the KKK represents the thoughts and feelings of your average CRACKER….I don’t believe that the firey rhetoric of some Latino activists that suggest Latinos take over the US is representative of most Latinos either…..EVERY SOCIAL…POLITICAL…RACIAL…RELIGIOUS…ECONOMIC GROUP HAS THEIR FIREBRAND FRINGE GROUPS…AND EXTREMISTS….

 
 
 
 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-08 06:42:31

Leaders should be elected based on their record of service….Their proposals and platform of solutions….Their capability to lead and How each leader responds ethically to their constituants…..
Obama seems to be really a SPECIAL INTEREST CANDIDATE…..
The American Voter has no idea WHAT OR WHOM THOSE SPECIAL INTERESTS ARE…..BUT THE FOLKS AT NQ ARE REVEALING A DANGEROUS EVIDENTIAL CASE THAT IS A CAUSE FOR ALARM…..

 
 
 

Comment by alibe | 2008-05-07 20:32:34

One does wonder about a few counties in Indiana and their reporting of votes and the strange happenings. Perhaps Hillary won bigger than it shows, but we know that would never happen with an Obama inspired election filled with his honorable supporters.

 
 

Comment by sonia | 2008-05-07 19:31:35

 

Comment by sonia | 2008-05-07 19:34:07

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/pledge-to-vote-against-obama-in-the-general-election

PLS PEOPLE

ASK UR RELATIVES TO SIGN IT TOO

PLS PLS
PLS PLS
ASK UR HUBBIES

ASK UR SISTERS

ASK UR MOTHERS

ASK UR WHOLE FAMILY

ASK UR CO-WORKERS

ASK UR NEIGHBORS

ASK ANYBODY AND EVERYBODY U KNOW

ASK REPUBLICANS TOO

WE NEED TO HAVE AT LEAST 10,000 SIGNS

PLS POST THE LINK EVERYWHERE ,,,ON ALL NEWSNETWORKS,BLOGS,NEWSPAPERS AND EVEN REPUBLICAN BLOGS

 

Comment by orionATL | 2008-05-07 19:43:53

was howard dean, current dnc chairman, involved with barack obama’s rise to power?

check out this web log:

http://www.rezkowatch.blogspot.com.

according to an article entitled “obama and the plan for a “new democratic coalition” “, he was.

note: “new democratic coalition” is a phrase donna brazile likes to use.

howard dean supporters were designing obmas’s career even before dean left the democratic race in feb, 2004.

so,

has dean placed impediments in clinton’s path to keep her from getting the democratic nomination?

Comment by requiemforadancer | 2008-05-07 19:59:58

Yeah, and then I wonder if he’s involved in the corruption, too.

You take money from terrorist enablers, even the Russian or Chinese government, you risk the security of the US. That’s what they want you to do, risk the security of the US.

Is this ok with that group of cretins?

American intelligence is dedicated to removing and mitigating those threats, did they forget, or think Rove had nullified national security, so they were free to transact?

Rove was supposed to take care of national security, like he was supposed to take care of Fitz?

Who would protect them, then?

That work out for them?

 

Comment by rwc | 2008-05-07 23:11:34

Thats creepy as hell. Dean has set himself up as king maker.

No wonder Edwards got crushed so easily and Hillary has had nothing but a brutal uphill battle.

 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-08 06:53:16

JEEEEZUS !……..Donnidiot Brazeal even stole the NEW DEMOCRAT MONIKER from The Centrist New Democrats……..OH BROTHER !……

 
 

Comment by J in Mn | 2008-05-07 19:45:38

I bet HC will have more of this stuff on tonight.

 

Comment by Paul | 2008-05-07 19:45:40

This site was good when it investigated intelligence gaffs. Now it’s a desperate attempt to smear the inevitable Democratic nominee.

I get that people love Hillary over here, but Obama is nowhere as evil as he is being painted.

My post is probably useless, but try & deal with the fact that Hillary needs to unite the party, show a little class & be a team player.

The focus should be on exposing the criminals in the Bush Admin, like Bloch who just got his office busted by the FBI.

Comment by requiemforadancer | 2008-05-07 20:01:55

Have you met Kevin, and Jeff?

They’re as perceptive as you.

Perhaps you could start a blog, something like the Daily, oh, Moe.

The Daily Moe.

Comment by victim.of.violence.of.obama.supporters | 2008-05-07 20:02:51

they should name their blog the daily terrorists.

Comment by requiemforadancer | 2008-05-07 20:09:32

Moe fancies himself an insurgent.

Comment by beebop | 2008-05-07 20:32:45

Thank goodness there is no moe … ;)

Comment by requiemforadancer | 2008-05-07 20:39:37

Moe Howard would take offense.

There shall always be Moe.

Rise, Moe, Rise.

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-08 07:10:00

The stooges would not vote for the ANTISEMETIC OBAMA….
if Given the chance…..Nuyuk…Nuyuk…Nuyuk….

 
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Mike Howell | 2008-05-07 22:02:26

Paul -

Screw you. The last time I checked this was still allegedly a democracy, which includes things like the right to run for election and voting.

How about the criminally befriended black guy dropping out for party unity?

The lone blue and incredibly corrupt state of IL won’t do anything other than make it a 49 state loss in the GE for Oblamer!

The FBI has already focused on your candidate’s homey and co-conspirator Rezko.

Screw you Paul and the screwed position your moronic cohorts have placed the decent people of this country in.

America deserves better than a criminal co-conspirator and race-baiter like Oblamer.

 
 

Comment by Melissa | 2008-05-07 19:51:41

Christams in June! ROFLMAO- I have been hoping Pat would do THAT cartoon- Rove as Santa with all the goodies! Who is the head elf?? the lead reindeer???

Come on Pat, you know it’s in there just waiting to come out!

 

Comment by blobert | 2008-05-07 19:52:27

Anybody up for a demonstration in front of CNN in NYC, to
tell them to BUTT OUT of this primary.
I am sick and goddamned tired of hearing them tell HRC to
stop the democratic process.
She is running because WE want her to be president.
I would like to personally tell David Gergen where to stick it.
And all the jerks who owe their careers to the Clintons.