These are Barack Obama’s Supporters
By SusanUnPC on May 11, 2008 at 11:18 PM in Barack Obama, Daily Kos
From a diary at the orange place titled, “Cheers to Hillary is 44, Taylor Marsh and MyDD“:
[…] [S]ome of Clintons “supporters” managed to do what the Clinton campaign could not, assure us a true candidate for change in the general.
Thank you for turning off numerous Super-Delegates with your threats to vote McCain. Thank you for revealing the depth of your disdain for our electoral process by feeding the likes of Hannity and Fox News.
Thank you for revealing your racial bias by referring to commentators as “brillo head”, Obama as “Osama” and for attempting to marginalize the votes of hardworking African American citizens. [WHAT? NEVER THAT I’VE SEEN ANYWHERE! HAVE YOU? ANY OF YOU? IF ANYONE SAID THAT HERE, THEY’d BE BANNED IN A HEARTBEAT.]
I don’t include good and reasonable Clinton supporters such as Trix and others in this thank you. But for Jerome Armstrong and others who insisted on making statements such as “He is unelectable”, thank you. You managed to create an atmosphere of hate so great that many good Clinton supporters, Super Delegates and voters could take no more.
Now watch “Hope” win the nomination, win the general, and bring this nation together, without absorbing or condoning such destructive behavior.
As I watch the Supers roll in for Obama I wish I could buy you all a round of Kool-Aid.
THE REALLY rich stuff - including quoting Mao (!) — is in the comments section, where Larry Johnson and I are named, as well as Taylor Marsh and (astonishingly) Jerome Armstrong, who co-authored a book with Kos:
We need to separate the 90% of Clinton supporters who are indeed good logical people and the Kool Aid Cultists like Jerome, Alegre, Lanny Davis, Susan Hu and Taylor Marsh.
The quicker we ditch these cancers, the better we all are.
I shall not rest until right wing conservatives are 4th party gadflies limited to offering minor corrections on legislation once or twice a year.
by davefromqueens on Fri May 09, 2008 at 01:01:10 PM PDT
TO WHICH SOME NITWIT “BraveheartDC” REPLIED:
Peas in a pod…
“We must separate loyal party members from counter-revolutionaries. The first shall inherit our glorious future. The second must be purged from us and history”.
-Mao Zedong
1953We need to separate the 90% of Clinton supporters who are indeed good logical people and the Kool Aid Cultists like Jerome, Alegre, Lanny Davis, Susan Hu and Taylor Marsh.
The quicker we ditch these cancers, the better we all are.
-davefromqueens
2008“I drank what”? -Socrates
by BraveheartDC on Fri May 09, 2008 at 03:35:39 PM PDT
::::::::::::::
I guess it is excrement like these people that Barack Obama is going to bring into his big new tent when he takes over the Democratic Party.
And this?
“We need to separate the 90% of Clinton supporters who are indeed good logical people and the Kool Aid Cultists like Jerome, Alegre, Lanny Davis, Susan Hu and Taylor Marsh.”
Preceded by a quote from Mao? You’ve got to be kidding me! Is that what this country is going to be returned to?
I’m proud — PROUD — to be in such company. As Larry once said, rather famously, “FUCK KOS.”
The call to exterminate Clinton supporters does not surprise me, for all Obama partisans are violent.
they exterminated us out of all of the democratic blogs.
They started by harassing, and eliminating posting rights, then when some remained, they threatened to “out” them.
Democratic Underground did basically the same, and all that remains in their political blog, are Obama supporters echoing each other. The Clinton supporters are out.
For a while, MyDD was a refuge for Clinton supporters. Then mysteriously, people like FleaFlicker, found themselves suddenly unable to post. This happened to me as well.
They hijacked our democratic blogs, and they are now hijacking democracy.
I left my beloved DU after 7 years because of the constant and vicious attacks on me by the OBama supporters… and this was earlier in the primary, when John Edwards and everyone else was still in there. The Clinton supporters did NOTHING to deserve that treatment, but the Ohbama supporters came out swining.
The Edwards supporters, I’d noted, were always pretty positive, the Hillary supporters were mostly positive, but after so many attacks some began sticking up for themselves. Most of us just left. DU was my sanity when Bush was innagurated instead of Gore, and they got me through 9/11, and many other tragedies around the world. We’d celebrated births and good news, and we rallied around each other during the deaths of some DU members. I was sick to see I was no longer welcome there..
I want my PARTY back!!
I was really suprised to see DU turn into a place where only around 50% of the registered Democrats are welcome. When you consider just how man “new” Democrats Obama has brought to the table, it’s even less then that.
Which makes me really wonder just why these “new” Democrats are somehow more important then those of us that have been Democrats for years. Where have these new people been? What took them so long to become Democrats? Where were they in the build up to the 2004 Presidential election? Maybe if some of these Kool-Aid drinkers had gotten off the fence and helped us elect an electable candidate then, we wouldn’t have gotten stuck with Kerry.
ME TOO. I have been a member of DU since they started after the 2000 election theft. I probably know you.:) I’m here under a different screen name. I see flyarm and fooj are here too! I’ve known them both for YEARS.
I had to leave. I knew some people there were radicals, but they usually hung out in the I/P dark hole dungeon most of the time. I never thought I’d see the day that Skinner would allow the Obamarhoids to take it over. I’m finished with DU until Hillary wins the nimination and then I MAY go back to rub it in their faces.:)
I hear you loud and clear. DU was a great place and kept me sane during the Bush years. Now, it’s horrible. I don’t feel like I’m a part of my party anymore. The Hillary bashers in DU are vile. The things some of these people like “Frenchy Cat” get away with saying are repulsive.
I can see DU itself getting T/S’d soon. They’ll never see another dime from me.
The only places I have been unable to post are taylor marsh and hillaryis44 - why is that?
I believe it is a result of your inability to offer anything remotely interesting to any discussion on politics.
No that would be an accurate description of you and all the other Obama trolls. Instead of working for your candidate you are so stupid that you insult people that will help to defeat your candidate if they should be alienated enough. And many Hillary Supporters are that alienated. But keep it up Troll, the more people you alienate the happier many of us will be.
We may dislike McCain, at least I do, but I hate Obama and his supporters with a passion.
OBAMAS’ SUPPORTERS WILL HIJACK THE VOTING MACHINES AS WELL…
FASCISM…..BERLIN 1933…..
I agree. these folks sound worse than republicans in their tactics. they are truly scary. Anybody But Obama folks - don’t forget - you have safe harbor at savagepolitics.com too!
Nah. They are controlled by republicans. If there’s any fixing going on it will be for them.
Or maybe they can hire the mayor of Gary Indiana to count the votes for them.
This appears to be your basic panic attack by Obama supporters. Someone finally ran the numbers, perhaps in the SuperDelegates perhaps Kos he’s actually competent with polling advice, so someone ran the polling numbers as they affect the EC. You remember that venerable institution.
And…..
Barry come up snake eyes vs. McSame. Go look at the upper corners of MyDD. Play around with FL and MI.
Then check out this guy who ran over 10,000 Monte Carlo sims:
http://hominidviews.com/?p=1509
Note: Barry’s position is getting worse.
The shock must be profound. I know it was when I told my D/L meatspace folks that Barry was a certain loser to McSame. And these are mostly Edwards supporters to begin with. They don’t want to vote for Barry but because the MSM sez, ‘Barry be the winnah!’ They’ve internalized it. I had a wonderful two hours confronting six people on everything from the scientific method, evolutionary psychology, Hitler, ‘bitterness’ and a raft of shit that Barry has stirred up.
In the end they were reduced to buh….buh…..buh….
The clincher? It’s clear as the nose on yer face that the MSM wants Barry.
Knowlegeable Dems know that means there is indeed something rotten in Denmark.
And now that the Oborg see their dream slipping away because ‘The One’ looks to be….
Well, the two words used by the bloggers I know who know ‘the math’ on this are:
‘Dukakis’
and:
‘McGovern’.
So the panic has set in. So what. Markos if yer readin’ this I’d keep those sports blogs of yours ticking over ’cause pal….
dKos is done….toast…burnt…fried…..ovah!
It won’t be long before folks will be saying….Kos? Who is that? Because Mr. Great Orange Satan…..
Americans have no use for losers.
.
When all is said and done in November, and Obama loses by a landslide due to his and his supporters’ race-baiting and arrogance, DKos will become the place for irrational excuse-makers whining about why they lost.
And they’ll blame everyone except themselves.
Even at Hullabaloo, under a diary posted by dday admiring Matt Stoller’s “Obama machine taking over the party” meme, comments included “Feminist white women aren’t shit.”
Foolish foolish foolish.
And they claim to want “unity.”
I think we all know who will have rendered the Democratic Party divided, ineffective, and out of office.
They don’t want “unity”. They want to get their way. I saw this kind of crap 40 years ago. If you weren’t with them, you were against them. If you did not agree you were purged. Fanatics are always the same no matter what part of the political spectrum they infest.
I am really coming to believe, and I find this astonishing, that it would be best for the country if McCain wins if Obama is the nominee. I can’t believe I just typed that. I cannot believe it.
Amazing, isn’t it, Marge, that perceptions will be that McCain is MORE moderate than Obama and his radical supporters.
But Americans do not fall, as a majority, into either far-left or far-right.
They fall into the middle, leaning left or right.
Forasmuch as I personally despised Richard Nixon, his “Silent Majority,” per 1972 landslide election, was a correct assessment of the American people.
The more Obama’s supporters present themselves as radical left, riots in Denver, yada yada, the more Americans move away from them.
If any of these “youngsters” supporting Obama had actually READ some political history, they’d understand that their own comments/behavior will result in their own defeat.
Americans don’t LIKE people who threaten to riot if they don’t get their way. And Americans don’t like party leadership that craters to those threats.
Bottom line.
They are operating on the assumption that Whomever Screams The Loudest Wins. I am pleased. This is a remake of the McGovern movie.
That same assumption gave us Tricky Dicky, did it not? People were tired of riots and unrest. Many of the voters that Obama would need if he were the nominee are people, like myself, who are old enough to remember those days. And we don’t want a repeat. Especially over a candidate that we don’t support or like.
I wonder that I stayed a Democrat for as long as I did. I don’t usually care much for people that are corrupt, lack integrity, and whose only real talent is for losing elections. (Except for that evil Bill Clinton of course. The only two term Democrat in the last 40 years.)
“…Bad reasoning….as well as good reasoning….is possible…and this FACT is the foundation of the practical side of logic”
YES WE CAN = FAULTY LOGIC
IT IS THE SLOGAN OF THE SIMPLEMINDED….
” …Americans have a genius for inventing new phrases to replace old ones with which we are no longer comfortable….The reality doesn’t change..only our way of describing it….” Ernest Conine. LA Times.
4/6/1975
Mmmmmm, brain food. Sounds like my type of debate.
Links to these snakepits? Especially now since the concert is over, and adults have to do the real nomination work?
Checked out the Clinton vs. McCain analysis:
http://hominidviews.com/?page_id=1160
He running historical averages of EC votes, and it shows time and time again, moderates win the day. Especially moderates who are more like 99.9% of the population they serve — not Moonbats.
Nice to see a more scientific analysis, and not one just talked down to us, you know “down-scaled” folks they think can’t understand these things. :rolleyes:
I don’t think BraveheartDC is a nitwit. I think she/he was pointing out the absurdity of the statement by Dave from Queens. I think you read it wrong and owe Braveheart an apology.
So one question, how do these high school and college kids expect to pay the bills of the Democratic Party and fund things when mommy and daddy are broke because of Obama’s lousy economic plans, by shared wealth in a democratic communist society?
Irony is dead
I’d wager for some of these people it never existed.
Irony? Your head is so far up your ass you wouldn’t know the difference between a fake messiah and a shitty candidate. That bubble you’re living in is stinking up the place, so shoo little Oborg.
Thank you for revealing your racial bias by referring to commentators as “brillo head”, Obama as “Osama” and for attempting to marginalize the votes of hardworking African American citizens.
I do remember one person, however, who referred to the Senator from Illinois as “Osama”:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APx2YJ-_jos
Maybe they should be picking on old Teddy Boy?
But one cannot ask Obamabots to be consistent.
very good blueasthesky! thank you for remembering this! great laugh. poor uncle teddy, to him all arabs look alike.
Kookie little things can’t tell what’s up, and what’s down.
That kind of thinking, like K**, lil grandiose Napoleons, and next thing you know, they’ll be wanting to start wars with Iran.
This is the new democratic coalition?
LOLOLOLOLOL
And they don’t get it.
As if any INTELLIGENT person would WANT to be around a marginal loser like K**, anyone with a career to protect.
See how they think they’re the center of the world, this nothing more than a game, as opposed to a situation where the decisions they make will impact their lives in ways they can’t comprehend?
Narcissistic children.
I always think of that song from Paul Simon, “You can call me Al”
Kos supports Obama for one reason and one reason only: Axelrod cash, which is distributed by none other than Antoin “Tony” Rezko and Nadhmi Auchi. Also keep in mind that Kos and Arianna Huffington were recently Republicans.
And I was recently a Democrat. Oh, well. If BO steals the nomination, I’ll vote for some Dems - those who supported her.
There are going to be lots of unhappy shitheads who foolishly think I’m going to keep dispensing cash like an ATM.
After this one state wonder, maybe next time they’ll think twice before they send-up a crook with terrorist friends.
But I doubt it.
How about a Populist Party for the majority of Americans?
I was going to say these ultra left whackjobs need to form their own party, but you’re right, the dems have become so corrupt and have so lost their way, those of us reasonable, rational folks need to forge ahead and create a better, brighter future. let them run the titanic into the iceburg we need NO part of it. thank goodness we have lifeboats like noquarter and savagepolitics.
You found it, I’ll follow it. Clinton/Edwards leading the ticket. Wonder how that would swing as a third party?
The links just won’t post. Must be a Kos allergy. lol.
I mailed them to larry.
Here they are:
http://www.dailykos.com/comments/2008/3/12/02257/1544/165#c165http://www.dailykos.com/comments/2008/5/2/9502/47595/161#c161
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/4/19/11333/7939/418/498923
What the Obamites can’t see or wont see is that I am voting for someone other than Obama NOT because of some resentment.
I will not vote for Obama because of OBAMA.
OBAMA is the problem. I am a Democrat 2ND, an American FIRST. My problem is with the man himself. The information we all have about his judgement and background is disgusting. I do not want HIM to be President. Yes, that is more important than the Democratic Party.
The Cheetos Colored Blog and Huff and Olbermann and the rest REFUSE to question Obama on the most basic issues. This is dangerous. It is Anti-American. It is MAOIST.
It is the behavior of a cult.
This is not a “bad mood” Clinton supporters are in. It is a sea change.
Obama is the problem. Not a “bad mood”. Unless the nominee is someone other than Obama - 30-50% will leave the Democratic Party. Not out of spite - OUT OF WISDOM.
I am not voting for Obama because my principles won’t allow it. I won’t vote McCain because I’m against Obama, its because my principles won’t allow me to vote for him. Its simple: I don’t vote, or I write in HRC.
And that is what Donna Brazille and Howard Dean are counting on….That the other 2/3 of the traditional democratic base stay home….or vote Nader…..What if this shit continues to November….McCain and Obama neck and neck….No clear winner ?
write in HRC, vote nadar, or bite the bullet and vote McCain - but please VOTE! Staying home plays right into Obama’s hands.
“…..Citizens who so value their ” independence ” that they will not enroll in a politicl party are really forfeiting independence….
Because they abandon a share in decision-making at the primary level…..the choice of the candidate…” Bruce L. Felknor. Dirty Politics.
** IMHO…MAKE YOUR MESSAGE COUNT IN THE GE IF OBAMA IS THE NOMINEE….MAKE SURE THE DNC HEARS IT LOUD AND CLEAR **
Think about it…..
WCA, I realized over the weekend that if I DON’T vote for McCain, Obama might be president. I must have seen that reasoning before, probably a lot, but it didn’t actually hit me until a couple of days ago.
I have to ask myself, and I am, or used to be, a yellow dog Democrat: Am I willing to risk Obama getting into office?
I’m still freaking out with the answer. It might involve (gulp) voting for a R-R-R…oh, geez, a moderate Republican (who’s trying to appear a little farther right right now, to attract votes).
Dear Lord. Please let Senator Clinton be the nominee!
Remember: Only 2209 delegates is legit!
Talktruth…I sympathize with your dilemma ( a situation requiring a choice between equally undesirable alternatives..Random house dictionary ) Voting republican for me goes against the grain so to speak….I am a life long democrat.
I have had to move beyond my historical party affiliation and my desire to see reforms on the democratic party platform to expand my consideration…..As these are not ordinary times, they require extrordinary concentration of the bigger picture….
OBAMAS’ CANDIDACY REPRESENTS AN EXTRAORDINARY THREAT TO THE FOUNDATION OF OUR CURRENT POLITICAL SYSTEM…
Now the argument can be made that since 2000 the GOP represents a similar threat…..
This is not a specious argument…It is more a matter of degree…
It is my belief that the racism inherent in many of OBAMAS supporters and the RADICAL associations he has is the greater threat…..IT IS FASCISM….IT IS UNSTABLE…IT IS RADICAL….
OBAMA REPRESENTS THE GREATER UNKNOWN….THE GREATER THREAT….HE HAS ALREADY DEVIDED THE PARTY…. HOW MUCH GREATER CAN THIS DEVIDE EXPAND….DOES HE SEEK TO REPRESENT ALL OF US….
So I ask myself which is the greater threat….and I look to the lessons of history….I am not a racist but I have to assume that a candidate who surrounds himself with racists has sympathy for the cause of racists….I have to assume that a candidate who surrounds themself with foreign corruption is tainted by that corruption….OBAMA IS A HYPOCRITE…
I see so many similarities in the rise of OBAMA to the rise of SIMILAR FASCISTS….that for me it is very clear….
IF VOTING FOR McCain WILL STOP THIS DEMAGOGUE FROM ASCENDING TO THE MOST POWERFUL POLITICAL OFFICE IN OUR COUNTRY…I WILL DO IT….TO ME IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY…
** OBAMA THROUGH HIS TACTICS AND HIS HISTORY ( what we know of it ) HAS DEMONSTRATED THAT HE IS THE GREATER THREAT…**
As these are not ordinary times, they require extrordinary concentration of the bigger picture….
Thanks, WCA. You’ve hit the nail on the head. It all boils down to that thing that BO so sorely lacks: JUDGMENT!
I’ve always felt that the greatest strength of the Democrats is not to walk in lockstep, but to take each situation individually. It’s one of the things that makes us seem scattered, but intelligent people can do no less. And that brings us back to your very concise appraisal:
As these are not ordinary times, they require extrordinary concentration of the bigger picture….
Hopefully, we won’t have to make that decision!
THis is true. If we don’t vote at all, we just support the shibboleth that Obama motivates voters in a way that Clinton doesn’t.
I love how turn out was up .way up, in Indiana, which Hillary won, and the blogs attributed it to Obama. We can’t win for winning!
I agree. If Hillary is not the Democratic nominee there is no reason for myself and family to be Democrats any more. This isn’t said out of spite or anger, it is said in the same way Republicans say that they didn’t leave their party, their party left them. Obama and his faux motivation-speaker persona is so obviously unqualified that I can’t believe the leaders of any party could be so dumb and I really don’t want to be associated with jaw-droppingly stupid people.
Well said, John Smart. My choice of Hillary for President is based on my detached judgment and yet Obama supporters seem to take it as a personal affront. That’s what I don’t understand about this whole scenario. Why do Obama’s people take my support of Hillary so personally? My support of Hillary seems to hurt them on an emotional level. Why are they so defensive?
‘Cause they know their candidate ain’t shit.
Absolutey what you said… I dont’ support Obama because of Obama. I am concerned about our security and economy, and I don’t believe he has the ability to do the job. He’s not ready for prime-time. He’s a small time politician that has been vaulted into this because he wrote a few books.. bfd.
The problem that Dean & the Elites have not considered is that their changing the rules and rearranging things to suit Obama is meaningless when he would be running against a guy that’s seen a moderate, independent, and likable. I dont’ believe he’s really those things, but public perception is everything. Has Dean asked himself WHY would any voter take a chance of a totally questionable and unproven jr. senator in our current climate if a seemingly moderate and proven politician like McCain is available for the job?
Hillary is the answer… the Party has left us.
I’m concerned about the security of our country, not just because BO is inexperienced but also because he is in bed with terrorist sympathizers. Just look his cronies advising him, giving him money - Zogby, Soros, Khalidi, Ayers, Malley, Wright, Meeks. All these people hate AM and have strong ties to racist radical groups. This is what scares me!
Obama couldn’t get security clearance to work as a defense contractor on a military base with his associates — this would be my guess. What I’m saying is that his associates and background would be checked — his word alone would not be trusted. And they’d check his wife and HER friends.
Speaking of Mao, some Bots are not unlike Red Guards. The the similarity of purging against dissents is uncanny.
They are BROWN SHIRTS…..Berlin 1933…..Hitler took over his party too…
Much like this propaganda poster:
http://www.1930shanghai.com/items/368839/item368839store.html
Complete with head trophies (then they wondered what inspires the Japanese soldiers in 1937?).
I swear, it’s like dealing with the Bushbots all over again, except it’s our side. I am so sad. I would never wish for the death of anyone, even a Bushbot. But they WANT TO KILL US BECAUSE WE WON’T VOTE FOR BARKY?! Damn. Just damn. You would think I killed their mothers…wait, aren’t true liberals against the death penalty? I’m so confused.
The word is TERRORISTS, nothing more!
This is called terroristic threatening. In some states there are laws against this sort of HATE speech.
You’re right, Strawberry.
When I think of the wingnut mob that descended on the Florida recount, and then compare the leftwingnuts at DKos descending on any Hillary supporter posting there, I see little difference.
When I see the media willfully trashing Clinton for any little verbal gaffe and letting Obama slide for same (57 states, etc), I see the same media that trashed Gore to promote our current President FlightSuit.
Frank Rich, Maureen Dowd, Chris Matthews, Tim Russert, Markos Moulitsos, Arianna Huffington, Josh Marshall: ALL of them trashed the Clintons in the 90’s, effusively praised George W. Bush over Al Gore, enthusiastically supported the Iraq invasion and bashed anyone who disagreed.
Why anyone would trust their judgement NOW is a wonder to me.
I don’t trust them - they have been corrupted by the influence they hold as journalists. Who I really blame though are the ignorant, gullible Americans who REFUSE to use their critical thinking skills. Why are so many people willing to swallow BS hook, line and sinker without asking a few questions first. That’s the tragedy.
cc the Average American does not get that involved in politics. They watch and they judge based on their own best interests, values and opinions. Then they pick what they often perceive is the less of two evils. Then they go to the polls. The next day, they get up and go to work. Some things scare them and drive them away. The average 19 year old does not perceive the same way the average 40 year old does. They put a stop to absurdity because they are adults and that is what adults reflexively do. They are also a lot quieter than their kids are, but one this is for sure: they vote. And when they do, they vote against that which scares them, however you want to analyze it. That is how George McGovern lost in a huge way. The silent majority always decides. I wouldn’t worry if I were you. Annoying as he is to us, They will decide. Barack Obama will never be president. He either goes down now or he goes down later. And the next day, the silent majority will get up and go to work, just like always.
How badly McGovern lost? This badly…
Richard M. Nixon
Electoral vote: 520
States carried: 49
Popular vote: 47,168,710
Percentage: 60.7%
George McGovern
Electoral vote: 17
States carried: 49 1+DC
Popular vote: 29,173,222
Percentage: 37.5%
Yep, looks like Nixon’s ghost has come back to haunt not only McGovern, the DP.
…Link banning Wikipedia now? AGH!…
Oops, that’s “States carried: 1+ DC” for McGovern.
Carter did even better in 1980, despite all the damage Teddy threw.
Now Teddy is someone who should be purged from the party. That fat ass is a major hypocrite. Always was. He loves the poor just so long as they live FAR FAR away from him. He “champions” women and then boinks anything that moves. He even squashed a windmill project because he realized he might be able to see them at a distance from his own estate. The man is morally bankrupt. That guy isn’t even going do die first before he goes to hell. He’s going to be sucked down bodily.
IN MY HUMBLE OPINION….OBAMA and his supporters work so outside the political spectrum that any comparison to Bush et, al. is irrelevant and perhaps even wishful thinking….The truth is we do not know….
If there is to be an historical comparison it is outside our own American History….
OBAMA ATTENDED A RACIST CHURCH FOR OVER 20 YEARS = FACT
THIS CHURCH AND IT’S DEMAGOGIC PASTOR IS BLACK SEPARATIST=FACT
BLACK LIBERATION THEOLOGY IS THEOCRATIC, RACIST & MARXIST = FACT
BLACK LIBERATION THEOLOGY IS POLITICALLY ALIGNED WITH THE NEW BLACK PANTHERS…THE NATION OF ISLAM… AND PROMOTES AFROCENTRIC SOLUTIONS BOTH SOCIALLY AND POLITICALLY = FACT
LIBERATION THEOLOGY PROMOTES MARXIST SOCIO-ECONOMIC CLASS WARFARE = FACT
OBAMAS’ ENTIRE RELIGIOUS AND POLITICAL IDOCTRINATION IS THROUGH HIS ASSOCATIONS WITH RADICALS AND FASCISTS = FACT
13% OF THE US POPULATION DOES NOT REPRESENT A MAJORITY = FACT
CONCUSION…..OBAMA IS A FASCIST EVEN IF HE SAYS HE IS NOT…
** JOHN McCAIN MAY BE MANY THINGS….BUT HE IS NOT DICATOR MATERIAL….HE IS AN AMERICAN….WITH A DEMONSTATED RECORD OF SERVICE…**
I hate to tell the writer of that article but the Kool Aid doesn’t work over here. I’ve been around the Democratic Party for a LOOONG time/get around to a lot of Clinton fundraisers. I can tell you that the Obamanots are going to be in for a BIGGG surprise if they think that a huge majority of Clinton supporters will coalesce around Obama if he’s the nominee. I’m not quite sure what planet they live on but I will give them a one word answer… MCGOVERN! The man was handed his ass on a plate and I am sure that it’s going to repeat itself this year. As for me, I voted Republican the last time in 1980 and history, again, will repeat itself if Obama is on the Dem ticket! Obama is a HUGE National Security threat to the USA! I’m not willing to even think about risking it so McCain is a safe bet for me!
I agree 100 percent!
Totally agree. Obama is a threat to this nation. He will throw our biggest ally in the Middle East, Israel, to the wolves of Hamas all for the sake of trying to appease Iran.
“….We are going to see increasing efforts by the Islamic world to win the hearts and minds of the American People….Since Muslims have the financial capacity…and the growing appreciation of the importance of public opinion in the West….THERE WILL BE TREMENDOUS INVESTMENT BY ISLAMIC STATES IN ALL FORMS OF INTERVENTION IN AMERICAN SOCIETY…. From the hiring of Public Relations Firms….TO MASSIVE SUPORT OF POLITICAL CANDIDATES…”
MARVIN ZONIS. ” ISLAM ” THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MAGAZINE. SEPTEMBER 1980
This was written in 1980….Have we not seen this come true…..
The author of the article you cite, Morgan Sandlin, resides in New Mexico.
Maybe he’s a neighbor of the traitor Bill Richarsoldout!
Methinks he has a bit of a surprise coming in return for his “loyalty”.
Has anyone (except maybe trolls) ever referred to Obama as “Osama” or “Brillo head” on this blog? I haven’t seen it happen.
Well they had to make SOMETHING up. After all, how else are they going to counter discussing slitting Hillary’s throat and tossing her into the river?
I think we ought to go over there and tell them to Iron our shirts.
I didn’t think so. So all they are skilled at is making up shit. (Sorry for the language, but in this case I mean it literally.)
Those violent posts were also on Obama’s campaign web site.
The article is so mixed. Taylor Marsh has a very pro-Hillary group who over-react like a gang. They interact with each other via comments, and go behind the blog to each other to create a 2 (or more)-against-1 bully campaign. They consistently run off solid Hillary supporters just because they suggest they calm down and think before they act. They had huge posts providing email addresses to all the SD’s, and then they’d post their rabid email message to them and get kudos from their fellow gang members. It is awful to see Hillary supporters behaving so badly. It doesn’t take much to get the media, and the Obama supporters to point out the worst of the Clinton campaign, and they just keep handing them embarrassing proof.
Today Taylor put up a post on the subject of civil discussions and her bigger bully group instantly started listing their excuses and entitlements followed by encouraging behind the scenes communications claiming they were being kicked off the site for bad behavior and needing to figure out where to go. Must be embarrassing for Taylor who is so clearly civil and democratic.
i have never seen it. I’ve been on here faithfully, and on Taylor Marsh often. When someone goes there with anything close to that, I know that I shudder and ignore the person. Frankly, when I see any supposed Hillary supporter using any offensive terms, I just assume they’re either republicans or obamabots trying to make us look bad. But no.. I’ve never seen either of those words used here.
Now this one takes the cake….TaylorMarsh has the most vile hatred on obama and his family than anything I have seen…even worse than here. you can call me a troll and I’ll get lost, but you must be shuddering and ignoring throoughout reading her blog because it is ALL hate for Obama and absolute adoration for Hillary - talk about kool aid!
Brillo-head is a complement compared to what they over at TM usually call him.
Yep you ARE a Troll.
Good - bye — stinky for Barky.
Oh please , Ellen.
The vile hatred for Hillary Clinton all over the Obama blogs is truly despicable.
It is the Obama supporters who have trashed our party “unity.”
Get over yourself, darlin. NObody ever called Michelle Obama a “c*nt” like they did Hillary.
Clean up your own house before you attack someone else’s , please.
Log in your own eye, and all that.
Don’t look so sad, Taylor said she’ll go after McInsane if Obama is elected.
To me, that would be defending Obama, but it’s that party fever stuff. :/
Ellen - That is a BOLD FACED LIE. Taylor Marsh has ALWAYS based her comments and statements on the ACTIONS of Obama and or Michelle not on the color of their skin. Everyone is accountable for their ACTIONS - you don’t get off the hook BECAUSE of the color of your skin which is what most of the media and Obama want us to believe. Obama chose to endorse Rev. Wright by supporting him and his cause financially for 20 years, publicly (giving speeches barely 1 year ago saying “He is a great leader for not only Chicago but for the entire country.”) and politically (5 months ago Obama personally placed Rev. Wright on his Presidential Election Committee). If Hillary endorsed the leader of the KKK financially, publicly or politically she would be held accountable.Those saying we the public should NOT hold Obama accountable to the same standard are the TRUE RACISTS for the only reason not to do so would be what?…THE COLOR OF HIS SKIN AND THAT, IS THE VERY DEFINITION OF RACISM.
Never seen those comments here or at Taylor Marsh. Haven’t been to every pro Clinton blog, but can’t imagine River Daughter or the other putting up with those comments either.