RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Will Barack Throw Mama From the Train? [Update Two]

COMMENTS ARE NOW CLOSED because we’ve surpassed 600 comments, BUT MAY BE VIEWED. CONTINUE YOUR DIALOGUES ABOVE.

I now have it from two three four sources (three who are close to senior Republicans) that there is video dynamite–Michelle Obama railing against “whitey” at Jeremiah Wright’s church. Republicans may have a lousy record when it comes to the economy and the management of the war in Iraq, but they are hell on wheels when it comes to opposition research. Someone took the chance and started reviewing the recordings from services at Jeremiah Wright’s United Church of Christ. Holy smoke!! I am told there is a clip that is being held for the fall to drop at the appropriate time. The last thing Barack and Michelle need is a new clip that raises further questions about her judgment and temperament. Here’s what the Republicans are currently using in Tennessee:

When the ugly video tapes about Jeremiah Wright’s racist ravings first broke Barack Obama told us he could no more disown Jeremiah Wright than his own Grandmother. Well, we all know how that turned out. So will Barack stand by Michelle when the tape emerges of her verbally attacking “whitey?” Republicans, who are otherwise gloomy about prospects in November, recognize that this recording will create real problems for Barack and give them a shot at the White House. It is their October surprise.

Does Barack have an obligation to tell the Democrats, super delegates in particular, about this tape? Did Barack and his campaign do their basic homework and identify this tape as a potential problem? And, more importantly, do they have a copy? Probably better to deal with this issue before the convention rather than wait for October. What do you think?

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post639 Comments

Comment by Truthteller | 2008-05-15 18:48:33

I also heard this rumor. She is a liability, and she will render Obama even more unelectable than he already is with the diatribes against “whitey” she uttered in Reverend Wright’s God Damn America Church in inner city Chicago.

Comment by Pheonix | 2008-05-15 18:56:08

render Obama even more unelectable than he already is

He is the Obamessiah, he can make the impossible happen! I did not think he could ever possibly be more unelectable but since he can part the Red Sea anything is possible I guess.

Comment by larry | 2008-05-16 13:30:54

this has got to be a necon republican site. This is the most hate fill site next to Taylor Marsh that I have ever been to. You guys are not democrats just Hillary worshipers.

Comment by Bob Kite | 2008-05-16 14:31:24

The media and the GOP have been hellbent on putting Clinton on the ticket. Why would they hold onto something like this? And if the context of how she said it was damaging, why is the word out of context? Would a member of this congregation run to the GOP with such a video? And how much would the Clintons pay for such a thing? Hail Mary. Full of shit.

 

Comment by Softy | 2008-05-16 14:34:58

What are you talking about? If she said things like these, then who’s to blame? The people that found it or her? I would rather find out how she feels about a group of Americans before they get into office rather than after it’s all over.

 
 
 

Comment by Clara Barton | 2008-05-15 20:09:49

Have all the church videos been removed from the website? Do we know if anyone has checked to see if there is truly such a video of MO? If there is or was, why in God’s name hasn’t it surfaced before now?

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-05-15 22:00:43

Probably the same reason why ABC news didn’t find David Vitter’s phone number on the DC Madam records. They didn’t CHOOSE to.

The “fix” is supposed to be in. They don’t want to float that tape until Barack is locked and loaded.

See, they WANT Obama as the nominee. That way, it’s easy to wipe the floor with him. Put McCain up against Clinton and we’ve got trouble for the GOP in River City….

If this is true, it’s a frigging bombshell. And depending on what MO has to say, it could be ‘all she wrote…’

Comment by Patrick Knif | 2008-05-15 23:57:13

You’re 100% correct. Republian leaders don’t want McCain to face Clinton in a general election because her record & qualifications are such that McCain would lose to her. Not so with Obama. Thus the Republican-owned & controlled media has attempted to blitz Clinton & get her out of the race while–at this time– repressing unfavorable reports about Obama. If Obama became the nominee, the media would turn on him with the same tactics it’s been using on Clinton, and he’d lose easily.

Comment by ChrisXP | 2008-05-16 01:44:11

Thus the Republican-owned & controlled media

That’s non-sense partisanship. Not truthful, not helpful, and full of BS.

The conservative media has been the most fair with Hillary. They’re not doing it out of the kindness of their heart, but because Hillary is taking their votes from their own backyard.

They never thought that Hillary would appeal to those very voters, considering all that’s been said in 8 years. Within a few months, things change, as well in a few months during the GE.

Comment by Adrienne Grey | 2008-05-16 03:10:27

All the media is the conservative media, including MSNBO. They’re all owned by parent companies who thrive off the GOP death and destruction economy. Don’t tell me they had you fooled by FOX pretending to support Hillary while all the others attack her! Silly…

*****A

Comment by PB | 2008-05-16 13:05:14

It sounds good, I know. But the facts don’t support it.

According to a story on NPR (source: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1919999) a Pew Study on Journalists and Liberal Bias, “found that a majority of American journalists say they are liberals.”

Study can be found here: http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?PageID=830

 
 
 

Comment by PB | 2008-05-16 12:55:30

Hillary’s campaign manager, Terry McAuliffe said himself that the “Republican-owned & controlled” Fox News has been more favorable to Hillary than any other news outlet. He actually thanked them for their “fair & balanced” coverage. I think what’s going on here is that Obama is the darling of the liberally-biased mainstream media, e.g. CNN. I have people very close to me who work at CNN, and they tell me that there is a strong, institutional bias towards Obama. They want him to be the next President, not Hillary or McCain. But you can bet they would take Hillary over McCain if they had to choose.

 

Comment by Softy | 2008-05-16 14:38:59

You’re dreaming. If Hillary is the democrat’s candidate, they will lose 90% of the black vote.

 

Comment by RMJ | 2008-05-16 14:55:53

They aren’t in the business of healping the Democratic Party putting out the best candidate to beat them.

Michelle has proven through her attitude that there is a good chance such video exists. Even if she wasn’t on camera more than once, doesn’t mean she wasn’t in the pews on numerous occasions.

 
 

Comment by s. hall | 2008-05-16 02:00:43

No matter what Michelle has said to the congregation of this hate-filled church if she preaches racism against White Americans than Obama candidacy is toast. We don’t need a racist Nominee for President of the United States. I want to see Howard Dean resign as DNC Chair because he has chosen to ignore Obama’s racism. All he had to do was read his book to see the feelings he harbors against White Americans. The fact that Michelle Obama feels the same way just states the obvious — these two people have no business running this country.

Comment by Michele | 2008-05-16 13:36:37

The stunning idiocy of comments such as this is shown in the willful “forgetting” or “ignoring” that Senator Obama’s mother is white, and that he was raised by white grandparents who he speaks lovingly of in his first book and during his speeches.

You people deserve resounding defeat. Forever and always.

 
 
 

Comment by RepublicanMule | 2008-05-16 01:07:48

The media is corrupt!

Why are the 2M+ voters not being counted when “they” never agreed to these terms or “so called” rules?

Why would the voters in FL and MI ever agree to have their voting rights taken away?

Why did it take over 1 year for the MSM to break the story of Wright, Farakhan and Ayers, not to mention all of the others that have close relationships with Obama?

Why havent thr MSM and DNC fight to make this a fair election rather than fighting to end this election?

Why is the DNC choosing to act as a “Dictator” rather than employing the “Democratic Process” to resolve FL and MI

Why has the (corrupt) MSM failed to see that very basic fact that the democrat elites are trying to force a desicion when the option for a re-election has always been available?

If Obama is truely the strongest, why wont you haver another election in FL and MI to prove it?

Why is this “So Called” man of “change and unity” not fighting for the voters right now?

This election is as phony as a 3 dollar bill!

Wake up sheeple, you are getting screwed! (again) by the MSM the DNC and the Elite left wing

Clinton or McCain 08

Comment by s. hall | 2008-05-16 02:08:46

The word is out — On Tuesday Obama will announce he is the winner of the nomination and because so many Americans know nothing about delegates and the election procress they are going to try to brazen their way through this. In my opinion this will end up being Obama’s Mission Accomplished moment. But they can’t stop Clinton and if this thing goes much further she will surpass him. This is not going to sit well with the American people who are fundamentally fair and are watching this woman being railroaded out of a nomination which should be hers. Florida and Michigan will only be counted when the Party is assured that Obama is the nominee. I have never seen anything like this in my life. They think we’re stupid — they have no respect for us as voters or as party members. I hope and pray that Hillary Clinton will run as an Independent but I fear that they are threatening her — to stop her from running.

 
 

Comment by Uppity | 2008-05-16 10:44:48

why in God’s name hasn’t it surfaced before now?

Well if the Republicans have it why would they release it now? Obama is easy fodder for them later.

 
 

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-05-15 20:40:51

Whoa! Really?????

 

Comment by NO WAFFLES PLS | 2008-05-15 21:17:59

EVERYONE

EVERYONE

EVERYONE

OBAMA HAS 400 PAID BLOGGERS TO WASTE UR TIME

SO DO NOT WASTE UR TIME

*****

******

*****

LETS DO A REVOLUTION

NO MORE USING A REGULAR NAME

EVERYONE USE A SYMBOLIC NAME LIKE

NO BARRY
NO WAFFLES
NO HUSSIEN
NO DRAMA OBAMA
NO 786(ITS MUSLIM LUCKY NUMBER)
NO BHO
NO SWEETIE
NO 130 PRESENT VOTES
NO KERRY
NO KENNEDY
NO EDWARDS
NO OPRAH
NO PASTOR WRIGHT
NEVER OBAMA
LOSER OBAMA
OBAMA IS A SUCKER
OBAMA IS A LOOSER
SAY NO TO OBAMA

OR JUST USE POSITIVE NAMES OF HILLARY

AND U KNOW ALL THAT

Comment by won't fall in line | 2008-05-15 22:20:13

 

Comment by ChrisXP | 2008-05-16 02:10:04

Or signatures like this plastered everywhere…

“And yet, even as I imagined myself following Malcolm’s [X] call, one line in the book stayed with me. He spoke of a wish he’d once had, the wish that the white blood that ran through him, there by an act of violence, might somehow be expunged.”

~ Barack Obama, “Dreams of my Father”

[This is why Barry went to a Black militant church; married a Black militant and “bitter” wife; and even threw his White grandmother under the bus: his core motivation, since he can’t rid White people from his veins, is to rid them externally instead]

 
 

Comment by RepublicanMule | 2008-05-16 01:02:43

The 2M+ voters that are not being counted never agreed to any of these “so called” rules!

Why would the voters agree not to have their votes count?

Why did it take over 1 year for the MSM to break the story of Wright, Farakhan and Ayers, not to mention all of the others?

Why havent thr MSM and DNC fight to make this a fair election rather than fighting to end this election?

Why is the DNC choosing to act as a “Dictator” rather than employing the “Democratic Process” to resolve FL and MI

Why has the (corrupt) MSM failed to see that very basic fact that the democrat elites are trying to force a desicion when the option for a re-election has always been available?

If Obama is truely the strongest, why wont you haver another election in FL and MI to prove it?

Why is this “So Called” man of “change and unity” not fighting for the voters right now?

This election is as phony as a 3 dollar bill!

Wake up sheeple, you are getting screwed! (again) by the MSM the DNC and the Elite left wing!

Clinton or McCain 08

Comment by Uppity | 2008-05-16 10:46:35

Don’t worry. Florida and Michigan will get another chance to re-vote–the kind the Obama camp can’t block. In November. And Barky will learn the hard way.

 
 

Comment by weltec2 | 2008-05-16 03:40:24

Seriously, we need you techies. We have got to get this video and expose it NOW before anymore super-deligates side with Obama. Once Obama has the nomination it’s going to be too late. They will wipe up the floor with him.

 

Comment by Kathy | 2008-05-16 08:25:35

This is only one reason why he won’t be elected. I do believe that there is more coming out on him. I would first question and have an audit done on where his funds are coming from and how he started the campaign with $100 million. Now that is a story.

 

Comment by jack kashinsky | 2008-05-16 10:09:41

We are Liberal-Centrists who will vote for McCain if the Lefty Loonies and the Liberal Elitists and the Black Maffia succeed in taking control of our party.

Please help us by signing our petition.

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/petition/819530914
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/tell-a-friend/576927

Jack Kashinsky,
Coordinator, “Give ‘em Hill in ‘08″

 
 

Comment by Lucinda | 2008-05-15 18:56:17

Don’t hold it until November. Show it now! So that the Democratic leadership can see it before the convention. We need to know everything that we possibly can before it’s too late.

Comment by Andy | 2008-05-15 18:58:08

I don’t think Larry has it…

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2008-05-15 19:56:55

What a honey-pot of un-vetted Democratically endorsed hypocrisy.

Get ready for a clip that will be nationally VERY painful.

Yes there will be outrage! But then we will hear tapes of Nixon in the Oval office….and the moral relativism will kick in or some other saint of victim-hood.

The truth is that had Obama NOT used the race card directly and by proxy the country would not be on this road.

Will BO deny being there? His kids? I would think if your spouse is speaking at the podium chances are you would be there.

I have witnessed the results of “Just words”.

“Call me Ishmael”…

Comment by Jill L | 2008-05-15 21:01:12

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2008-05-15 21:34:10

Me? Pardon?

Comment by Jill L | 2008-05-15 21:44:53

okay… I got you… I was too busy dancing in celebration to properly read the rest of your post… my sincere apology… Can Christmas really come in May? … ok, back to dancing!!

Hillary ‘08

Comment by kanaught | 2008-05-15 23:49:59

i demand they release it now. get him out now and let hillary win in november already please. get your heads out of your butts dnc and good old boys club. obama is trouble and hillary will have missed her opportunity to become the first female president this year in 2008. she has worked so hard to win this and to lose it to a guy who is going to lose in november is just plain mean. the dnc are aholes. sorry but i am so upset with their lack of leadership and not picking the obvious winner…

Comment by weltec2 | 2008-05-16 03:48:03

and this is WHY the supers were created in the first place… frevenzakes!

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by StatBabe | 2008-05-15 23:01:42

The truth is that had Obama NOT used the race card directly and by proxy the country would not be on this road.

Man, are you right about that! I was listening to Alex Bennett on Syrius Left today, and he made this SAME point. An Obama supporter called in and complained about what he was saying–accused Alex of giving Hillary a “free ride”. Alex pointed out that he had been hard on Hillary, too, but that all the race business had been totally concocted by the Obama people. As Bennett pointed out, Obama was desparate before the South Carolina primary because Hillary was polling BETTER with blacks than Obama was. So what did Obama and his surrogates do? Why, they cried “racist” at EVERY SINGLE THING coming out of the Clinton campaign! And of course, the idiot media played right along! To this day, I will NEVER understand what was wrong with Hillary talking about the role that LBJ played in civil rights. Even MLK recognized this, and it galled me no end when the Obama campaign tried to make Hillary into a racist for merely reflecting on some of the other players in the civil rights movement besides MLK!

Interestingly, Alex Bennett said that the Obama-bots had been calling him right and left and accusing him of being a “right winger” with many even calling Alex a “racist” for not bowing down and kissing Obama’s ring. He complained about this, too–he said that the extreme lefties were just as hateful and destructive as the right wingers. On that point, I totally AGREE with Alex–authoritarianism is bad, whether it comes from the right or the left! Sadly, from what I have seen thus far, there are a lot of authoritarian types associated with the Obama campaign, and I’ve seen little out of “The One” to indicate to me that he has tried to rein these people in. The crowd in Michigan that booed John Edwards for saying nice things about Hillary is a perfect example of this. Over half the crowd were booing, and if Obama had exhibited any sort of positive leadership, that would not be occurring to such a great degree.

Comment by kanaught | 2008-05-15 23:55:45

yeah i will never understand how the words “kid” in reference to obama and “fairytale” an ever be interpretted as racist. i guess i can never read any of those famous fairytales we grew up with to any of the kids i know… whoops i said fairytale, i must be a racist… man how the heck can you ever spin the words fairytale, get real media jerks and nobama.

Comment by Uppity | 2008-05-16 10:49:52

yeah i will never understand how the words “kid” in reference to obama and “fairytale” an ever be interpretted as racist.

It’s racist when South Carolina is coming up and you know that the AAs in America are torn between Hillary and the new black guy. It was necessary for Barack Obama.

 

Comment by tzada | 2008-05-16 13:41:23

Ya about that fairytale remark, I never figured it for racial either. I did think it had some reference to Larry Sinclair or Donald Young though.

 
 

Comment by fooj | 2008-05-16 01:31:18

Positive Leadership? His behavior was disgraceful.

 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-16 06:12:06

It was the only way Obama could win….Devide and conquer…
It’s not like he had a record that was comparable. Good heads up Larry….I hope it leaks before it’s too late for Clinton….

 

Comment by beebop | 2008-05-16 06:28:30

I am so happy to be out here in small town Ohio where when the back lash starts it will be relatively milder than it will be up the road in places like Cleveland. How much good has screaming “racism” done so far?

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-16 06:51:56

Amazing how 13% of a large population can hold the other 87%
psychological hostage….No ? And what about AA supporters of Clinton or even AA republicans….Obama should have put an end to this instead of used it….The tunnelvision of His campaign is truly incredible….and frightening…..Berlin 1933

Comment by Uppity | 2008-05-16 10:51:11

The problem is, this “hostage” thing can’t work in a private voting booth.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-05-16 07:35:12

Those tapes were bought by some sane person in the Democratic party, they just haven’t put the same amount of research as the Republicans. They will now.

I hoping the Clinton campaign goes nuclear at the convention and show all of this on the convention floor.

Its time to let the truth out. Its time for a Revolution against the Obama campaign, his backers, and his bought and paid for media.

The country comes first, people second, party third.

 
 

Comment by ChrisXP | 2008-05-16 02:21:11

Don’t hold it until November. Show it now!

They can’t and won’t, because it’ll give Obama time to spin against it. It’s why the Swift Boat ads were so effective.

Time is the deciding factor here, and October surprises hurt the worst.

It’s how to “seal the deal”.

All the Republicans can do with Hillary is bring up tired old news from White Water and Bill’s escapades (did the same dirt hurt Nixon in ‘72? No).

But with Obama, he’s playing with fire, fire that gets innocent people killed and lynched. Such an ego that kills others so he can be some token Black, is what makes him so diabolical.

“And yet, even as I imagined myself following Malcolm’s [X] call, one line in the book stayed with me. He spoke of a wish he’d once had, the wish that the white blood that ran through him, there by an act of violence, might somehow be expunged.

~ Barack Obama, “Dreams of my Father”

[This is why Barry went to a Black militant church; married a Black militant and “bitter” wife; and even threw his White grandmother under the bus — his core motivation, since he can’t rid White people from his veins, is to rid them externally instead]

Comment by rjj | 2008-05-16 02:54:55

Nah. It’s called puberty.

Think back. Having something like race to hang all that turmoil on would have been handy.

I only knew two Kenyans plus one Luo, but that self-indulgence and self-aggrandizement seem very much a whitey thing (probably explains his broad appeal), so he may have a point

 
 
 

Comment by Andy | 2008-05-15 18:56:34

Obama cares about Obama and he will bring the Dems down into the hall of shame come Nov. Obama’s life achievements are MIA and his life relationships a disgrace.

 

Comment by Pheonix | 2008-05-15 18:59:58

Someone else will dig up that footage and release it shortly now that we know it exists. No level of damage control can ever save BO from this one. It would be devastating.

Comment by ginaswo | 2008-05-15 19:40:16

yep One more hypocrisy from the Obama camp

playing the race cad left and right and they sat in a pew for 20 years and now Michelle was herself ranting against whites in the pulpit??

and we get treated to his great race speech on front of 12 flags telling us typical white people have to acknowledge the legitimate grievances of people like Wright who went to nice schools and got their phd/law degree etc etc

oh forget it

he is done
done

give us Hillary SDs PLEASE!

Comment by NO WAFFLES PLS | 2008-05-15 21:20:26

EVERYONE

EVERYONE

EVERYONE

OBAMA HAS 400 PAID BLOGGERS TO WASTE UR TIME

SO DO NOT WASTE UR TIME

*****

******

*****

LETS DO A REVOLUTION

NO MORE USING A REGULAR NAME

EVERYONE USE A SYMBOLIC NAME LIKE

NO BARRY
NO WAFFLES
NO HUSSIEN
NO DRAMA OBAMA
NO 786(ITS MUSLIM LUCKY NUMBER)
NO BHO
NO SWEETIE
NO 130 PRESENT VOTES
NO KERRY
NO KENNEDY
NO EDWARDS
NO OPRAH
NO PASTOR WRIGHT
NEVER OBAMA
LOSER OBAMA
OBAMA IS A SUCKER
OBAMA IS A LOOSER
SAY NO TO OBAMA

OR USE POSITIVE NAMES OF HILLARY

 
 

Comment by s. hall | 2008-05-16 02:16:06

phoenix — I agree. The fact that Larry got this from three separate sources means that there are people in the Republican Party who want Obama candidacy finished now. Last week I heard on Fox News that Hillary has what they called a nuclear option — something on Obama so devastating that it would bring down his candidacy. Others have this and maybe Hillary’s campaign has this also. So many people know about this thats its bound to surface.

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-16 06:23:38

I agree with you S.hall….The New Politics of OBAMAS’ CAMPAIGN upset and disturb old styl pols from both sides of the aisle…
It is one thing to argue over policy or ethics….The usual….But injecting Race especially in WarTime and Nationwide Economic Stress is volatile….

OBAMAWRIGHTFARRAKHANISTAS = FASCISM….IT IS RACSIM AS DETESTABLE AS THE KKK OR THE NAZIS

 

Comment by Lou | 2008-05-16 13:26:57

400 people from the “gaza strip” yes Gaza strip have been hired by BHO camp to spew racism and hatred . Please take it for what it is. No Amercian would really act like that would they

Comment by Andy | 2008-05-16 13:35:51

Lou: Wow…

I remember watching a video of some guy and his group in gaza doing phone banking for Obama before the elections (fu—— unbelievable)

If they were hired or in any way coordinated with his campaign that would be monstrous….even if they were 10 let alone 400.

How come this is not illegal is beyond me: are we outsourcing the democratic participation process now?

Lou, do you have some link/article/ on this? Thanks.

 
 
 

Comment by DEBI | 2008-05-16 13:08:55

God, I hope the media gets this, but if its like everyhting else,they’ll ingore it.

http://reflections-in-tyme.blogspot.com/

 
 

Comment by Retired | 2008-05-15 19:00:09

I guess my question is: Is Hillary’s team going through the church tapes, pulling out this excerpt, and taking it to the superdels and the DNC? And if so, are these elites so deluded by their sense of the overriding power of “white guilt” (an affliction suffered by elites of pallor, but which working stiffs probably don’t have time for as they commute between their second and third jobs) as to think that a prospective FLOTUS herself caught on national TV in a racist rant can be effectively countered by some mumbo jumbo about Mr. Obama being “post-racial?”

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-05-15 22:05:04

The original citation said that the REPUBLICANS are the ones who have this tape. Not the Clinton team. I imagine this will be a topic for discussion NOW. And if I were a superdel, I’d want to see the thing BEFORE I cast a vote.

 

Comment by Carol 17 | 2008-05-15 23:17:26

I heard the Hillary camp knew of an October surprise but didn’t know “how to get out there.”
I hope Sean Hannity gets a hold of it and puts it out there sooo.

Nobama Noshelle 08

Comment by s. hall | 2008-05-16 02:22:28

Carol — I heard that too. I read that the reason that Hillary was continuing her race for the Presidency is because she and Bill know something about Obama which would make him a dangerous person to have as President. Then I saw on Fox the other day that Hillary should not quit the race because another shoe might drop. Same day Pat Buchannon said the same thing.

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-05-16 07:54:57

There are several types of ’shoes’ to drop for Obama.

We have the designer-type with Rezko/Auchi all the way down to the Larry Sinclair/limosine/blow job-glass dick sneaker-type variety.

Kind of exciting actually. I’m just a little antsy about the timing.

It would be ideal if the portfolio is unveiled prior to May 31st rules committee meeting. It
would save face for the Dem party now rather than the bloodbath that will occur in Denver if this charade is allowed to get that far.

 
 
 

Comment by kanaught | 2008-05-16 00:00:03

the thing is that i wish some media out there was unbiased and would have the guts to release it. maybe an npr station or democracy now? any other ideas. someone with some balls needs to release this if the dems united behind hillary will win in november. get it out there man, show obama and his wife for who they really are… they have damn well done enough to be biased against hillary that it is the obamas turn to face the heat and the storm.

Comment by s. hall | 2008-05-16 02:29:04

kanaught — what the media has done is so dangerous. They decided a man with no experience should be president then sold him 24/7 to the American people. They have ignored anything negative about him and now they have decided the race should end in order to give him the nomination. They did all this right in front of our eyes. They will never broadcast anything that hurts their candidate. This should be released on the Internet where it will have more impact and a bigger audience.

 
 

Comment by Lou | 2008-05-16 13:32:09

“MR” Obama= paid “gaza strip” workers.
They will say the most nonsensical things.
Pay attention please.

 
 

Comment by satin.sheets.feminist | 2008-05-15 19:02:55

I notice Michelle Obama did not campaign in WV. If she did, I imagine 80% and not 52% of voters in that state would think he shares the views of Reverend Wright.

Good luck with that, Democrats.

 

Comment by Pheonix | 2008-05-15 19:03:21

We should start a pool. Who will release the video?

Bill O’riely?
Sean Hannity?

I doubt MSNBO or BNN will release it.

Hey Fox News, we know you monitor this blog, go grab yourself the ultimate exclusive ratings booster!

Comment by speaktruth | 2008-05-15 20:58:39

Fox must have it, and is holding it until he is the nominee. They want him as nominee. O’Reilly said already on the air that he has all kinds of damaging stuff from Chicago. Probably Rezco related, and more. This is probably one of many examples.
How can we get this out before he is crowned?

Comment by Pheonix | 2008-05-15 21:32:15

Contact O’Reilly and Hannity and tell them it is their patriotic duty. Ask them “Do you really want to wait until October and roll the dice with our nation’s future?” There is no guarantee McCain beats Obama. Do they want to take that chance?

oreilly@foxnews.com
hannity@foxnews.com

Comment by ginaswo | 2008-05-16 11:26:27

Would the foreign press release it and help the American people? Maybe our Canadian press brothers and sisters to the North, the foreign press seems to still be comprised of actual journalists……

 

Comment by Lou | 2008-05-16 13:34:12

Hillary women Dems will not allow their families to be subjected to an Obama presidency.
He hasn’t a chance

 
 

Comment by rwc | 2008-05-15 23:52:33

They are driven by pure pragmatics. It will be released when it can do the most harm to Obama yet protect McCain from facing Hillary.

Comment by s. hall | 2008-05-16 02:34:53

rwc — there is one problem with that senario and that is Obama will continue to run as the younger man — new to Washington’s ways and will make McCain look old and weak and part of the old Washington culture. So by the time the Republicans bring out the video Obama will have given the finger to McCain and will once again make himself the victim of racism. The standard Republican slime machine will not work with Obama –

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-16 13:57:54

It will work if the info shows Obama to be a serious threat to US.
Then Americans would elect anybody….If it means stability and it’s american….Look how many of us here….Committed lifelong democrats and independents who are reacting to the fascism we see already….And many of us are saying we would vote for McCain if it would prevent Obama from getting the POTUS…Not because he is AA but because he is what many of us perceive as a danger to US.

 
 
 
 

Comment by bamaoil | 2008-05-16 00:02:10

Maybe one of the black media outlets will release it.

 
 

Comment by BBB | 2008-05-15 19:04:47

Is there anything besides hearsay on this matter? A rumor?

Comment by Pheonix | 2008-05-15 19:06:19

I now have it from two sources close to senior Republicans that they have video dynamite

Larry Johnson is a straight-shooter. I trust what he says.

Comment by V | 2008-05-15 21:10:16

Oh how I pray this is true!

Comment by Shainzona | 2008-05-15 23:00:13

 
 

Comment by wry | 2008-05-15 22:36:23

I believe Larry %100 but what if his sources are misinformed?
Please, this is too good to be true!

Comment by Pheonix | 2008-05-15 22:38:10

This is why he has multiple sources.

 

Comment by Janicen | 2008-05-15 23:02:16

Yeah. I’ve always believed that anything which seems too good to be true, usually is.

Prove me worng Larry! Please!

Comment by kanaught | 2008-05-16 00:03:46

yeah like when i heard a rumor before pennsylvania that edwards was going to endorse hillary the next day after penn win… i don’t know what went wrong with that one except that nobama probably paid him off or promised him something.

 
 

Comment by s. hall | 2008-05-16 02:40:15

wry — I believe this is true because the Obamas have not been careful to hide their relationships with America haters, Anti-Semites and people who have bombed this nation. The head of the New Black Panther Party has endorsed Obama and Obama has a friendship with Louis Farahkan, a black muslim. Also Obama wrote two books peppered with his anger against white people.

 
 
 
 

Comment by Uppity Woman | 2008-05-15 19:04:53

A video of Michelle being hateful? How can this be?

Comment by Pheonix | 2008-05-15 19:08:37

Well it just can’t be! The WORMS will come out and say “Michelle is being taken out of context” and we are all racists. I just checked, 15 minutes has passed since the last allegation of racism from us. So we are long overdue.

Comment by Pheonix | 2008-05-15 19:11:34

Actually you probably got caught in the spam filter by accident.

Comment by SKMF | 2008-05-15 23:50:05

(a day later…)

i got it, that was funny…

 
 
 

Comment by beebop | 2008-05-15 19:19:21

I know! It is impossible to believe for me too … ;) She is such a delightfully sunny, upbeat and cheery person, don’t you think? Imagine her being nasty or unpleasant? I. AM. SHOCKED? LOL

Comment by Shainzona | 2008-05-15 23:02:20

Did you notice her jaw lately - stuck out like a prow of a ship. That lady is suffering from a big bad painful case of TMJ!

She is not a happy camper! Can you imagine her as First Lady….dooh, no!!!