RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Obama Is Too Old and Confused to be President

sultanknish.jpgBY SULTAN KNISH (photo left)

McCain is too Old and Confused to be President. That’s the message that Obama supporters are trying to put out and they have a point. After all McCain is clearly old. McCain is an aged 71 while Obama is a spring chicken at the tender age of 46.

Unlike McCain, Obama is unconfused and on the ball all the time.

For example Obama knows that there are 57 states in the Union and he’s visited every one of them. Particularly Mars.

Obama knows that 10,000 people died in a Kansas tornado that killed only 10 people. Clearly math was never his strong subject.

obama.jpgAt Selma, Obama informed us that his parents met four years after he was born and that his Kenyan diplomat father had a flag draped coffin.

He knows that Canada’s Prime Minister is actually a President

Obama knows they speak Arabic in Afghanistan and that there are poppy fields in Iraq

Obama knows that Matt Lauer is really Tim Russert

Obama had no idea whatsoever that his home church and the reverend with whom he had a 20 year relationship was a crazy america hating racist.

Hell Obama couldn’t even figure out how to use the voting buttons in the Illinois State Senate

Barack Obama angered fellow Democrats in the Illinois Senate when he voted to strip millions of dollars from a child welfare office on Chicago’s West Side. But Obama had a ready explanation: He goofed.

“I was not aware that I had voted no,” he said that day in June 2002, asking that the record be changed to reflect that he “intended to vote yes.”

On March 19, 1997, he announced he had fumbled an election-reform vote the day before, on a measure that passed 51 to 6: “I was trying to vote yes on this, and I was recorded as a no,” he said. The next day, he acknowledged voting “present” on a key telecommunications vote.

He stood on March 11, 1999, to take back his vote against legislation to end good-behavior credits for certain felons in county jails. “I pressed the wrong button on that,” he said.

Obama was the lone dissenter on Feb. 24, 2000, against 57 yeas for a ban on human cloning. “I pressed the wrong button by accident,” he said.

On Nov. 14, 1997, he backed legislation to permit riverboat casinos to operate even when the boats were dockside. Moments after its passage he rose to say, “I’d like to be recorded as a no vote,” explaining that he had mistakenly voted for it.

Maybe Obama was just tired all these years and needed a nap. Let’s just hope he manages to figure out how the nuclear button and the intercom button works before he blows up the planet while trying to order some Spanish ham.

But don’t worry, when Obama’s campaign makes a mistake, it’s always his staffers who are at fault.

After the Politico raised questions about questionnaire Obama filled out in 1996, Obama supporter Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wa., took to Tucker Carlson’s MSNBC Show to say, “He didn’t fill it out and he did not support those positions then . . . That was a questionnaire filled out in his first state Senate campaign back in 1996 not by Senator Obama but by somebody on his staff that didn’t get it cleared.”

Well that sort of thing can happen once or twice, right? Or over and over again. But what can you expect from a guy who doesn’t even know what letters he’s writing or for whom?

In a March 2008 interview with the Chicago Sun-Times to answer questions about Tony Rezko, Obama was asked about the fact that Obama had told the newspaper in November 2006 that he had never been asked to do anything to advance Rezko’s business interests. But the Sun-Times had subsequently learned about a October 28, 1998 letter Obama wrote to city and state housing officials on behalf of a housing project for seniors that Rezko was working on.

Responded Obama: “I wasn’t even aware that we wrote the letter. The answer that I gave at the time was accurate as far as I knew…This was one of many form letters, or letters of recommendation we would send out constantly for all sorts of projects. And my understanding is that our letter was just one of many. And I wasn’t a decision maker in any of this process.”

Who does the buck stop with? Not with Barack Obama who barely even knows when he’s writing a letter in support of building a senior center on a toxic chemical spill waste site for the guy closely tied to his law firm who raised hundreds of thousands of dollars for him. I mean whatdaya expect anyway? He’s not a decision maker.

But with all of Obama’s confusion and his ignorance of how many states there are and his constant inability to keep his staff from fooling him, maybe Obama is just too old and confused to be President.

At 46 isn’t it time for Barack Obama who has had a dignified record of pressing the wrong buttons in the Illinois Senate and a hundred days or so in the US Senate voting Present on many major issues, to be put out to pasture and retire so he can finally enjoy the good life?

Far be it from me to mock Obama’s premature senility but it would seem that his age and mental confusion makes the Presidency a too high pressure job for someone with his fragile memory and awareness.

Instead maybe it’s time for the Democratic party to let in some fresh new blood such as 32 year old Rep. Patrick McHenry from North Carolina or 21 year old superdelegate Jason Rae. They clearly have the fresh ideas and the experience garnered from years of videogaming to figure out which buttons to press to vote on crucial issues.

If younger is better, than we can certainly do better than Obama. It’s time for new ideas and less confusion. It’s time for Obama to take his nap and make way for the younger generation. The fact is he’s clearly too old and confused to be President anyway.

::::::::

Visit my blog, Sultan Knish: “from NY to Israel Sultan Reveals The Stories Behind the News.”

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post174 Comments »

Comment by Northwest rain | 2008-05-19 22:07:16

Well early onset Alzheimer disease does exist. A friend started showing symptoms at about Obama’s age.

Either that or Obama has Ray-Gun’s disease.

Comment by Gregoryp | 2008-05-19 22:47:06

I was going to suggest that maybe Obama ought to get tested for this. After all he has children and they would be at risk if it has a genetic component. Of course, there are other things that can cause these symptoms as well. Could be as simple as not getting the proper nutrition. What is clear is that we don’t need another idiot for a president no matter the reason. Been there, done that. Let’s not do it again.

Comment by President Hillary Clinton will defeat Obama and his troll army! | 2008-05-19 22:58:30

He admitted drug use in his past. Do you think it is possible he is still a user? That could explain some of his behavior.

Comment by Musical Notes | 2008-05-19 23:07:59

I wouldn’t care if he was still using drugs. Stuff like this has no influence on people who vote on the issues. This is all gutter politics. We’ve had enough of this kind of stuff from Karl Rove. Thinking Americans now vote on the issues and will vote for Barack Obama over John McCain this fall!

Comment by President Hillary Clinton will defeat Obama and his troll army! | 2008-05-19 23:13:47

I wouldn’t care if he was still using drugs.

I would think he would lose his security clearance if he was using drugs. I assume he has one as a Senator.

But I was asking the question since it might explain the behavior we are seeing. And he did admit drug use in his past in case you forgot.

As to your “Thinking Americans” they are not pod people like yourself and they will never vote for Obama knowing what we know about him.

Comment by John | 2008-05-20 06:25:48

tells you all you need to know about Obama supporters, doesn’t it? Musical Notes doesn’t care if Obama is using drugs. Probably doesn’t care if Obama is a racist, or a closet muslim, or a friend of domestic terrorists, or a bag man for the nuke industry.

All Musical Notes cares about is that it’s Barack Obama. That’s the issue. He’s the Chosen One. Vote for him, or you are a Rovian fool. Because we must care about The Issues- you know, the ones Obama slides past while making those Amazing Speeches.

Comment by President Hillary Clinton will defeat Obama and his troll army! | 2008-05-20 07:14:49

“Historic speeches.”

 

Comment by haypops | 2008-05-20 10:38:38

Actually past drug use does permanetly change the brain’s chemistry. I’m not to sure how important this as President Bush was a past drug user. Look how ell that turned out (sat.)!

 
 
 

Comment by Hope | 2008-05-19 23:19:03

 

Comment by SKMF | 2008-05-19 23:26:02

musical,

thinking americans?
are you reading this stuff off a card?
you guys get less and less talented, so pathetic, your side really needs to get some better writers…

YOU SUCK…
LOL

 

Comment by Gregoryp | 2008-05-19 23:32:43

What is wrong with you people? Do you not understand the awesome power and responsibility of the Presidency of the USA? The fact that Obama admitted to using drugs should automatically disqualify him for the office for a probably a million reasons. I’ll list:
A. Bad judgment
B. Possible brain damage
C. Weakness of character
D. Addictive personality
E. Bad role model
F. Drugs are illegal/ President is chief law enforcement official in land
G. Possibility of relapse
H. Possibility of physiological damage to heart, other organs or organ systems
I. Unable to gauge consequences of actions aka A.
J. Blackmail possibilities ie national security risk
K. Heightened increase of scandalous activities
L. Has a different set values than most of us (non normative value system)
M. Anyone who does drugs is an idiot
N. No remorse or treatment for actions means sociopathic and narcissistic behavior
O. Did I mention that drugs were illegal in all 50 states? People go to prison for what Obama has admitted to doing.

Comment by Hillary or Bust | 2008-05-20 03:09:15

I don’t have a problem with people who have tried drugs as part of experimentation here and there. I also have great respect for anyone who has kicked an addiction and has totally turned their lives around because of a personal spiritual transformation.

People who *currently* use drugs regularly are bad news, however. And I do not support regular drug use. But of all the reasons as to why Obama is unfit to be president, anti-drug hysteria beside the point.

(Bush did cocaine, apparently, Clinton didn’t inhale, etc.)

And no, I’m not an Obama fan. But this drug hysteria is a bit overblown. Don’t get me wrong - I think consistent drug use is very ill-advised, but so is consistent drinking in my book, and drinking is legal.

Comment by John | 2008-05-20 06:35:55

“I don’t have a problem with people who have tried drugs as part of experimentation here and there. I also have great respect for anyone who has kicked an addiction and has totally turned their lives around because of a personal spiritual transformation.

People who *currently* use drugs regularly are bad news, however. And I do not support regular drug use. But of all the reasons as to why Obama is unfit to be president, anti-drug hysteria beside the point. ”

But wait! By your logic, any drug user is just a guy who hasn’t yet quit, and the moment he does, he’s earned your “great respect”- so why do you have a problem with them?

They are just people you are going to have “great respect for” in the future, after all!

Your post reminded me of a High School graduation ceremony I went to some years back. A girl was giving a speech about overcoming obstacles- she was selected to give the speech because she had been a drug user her freshman year, gotten pregnant, dropped out of school- and then had given up her kid for adoption, gotten tutoring, and returned to school, and here she was, getting her diploma. A Real Story of Courage We Should All Admire.

Except, here she was being celebrated for basically fucking up. Listening to her in the audience were hundreds of kids who had NOT fucked up, but had made the RIGHT decisions all along. Who wanted to hear from them? Losers. They should have been total screw-ups first. Then maybe they could have been up there, giving a speech.

 

Comment by ChrisXP | 2008-05-20 08:07:26

I also have great respect for anyone who has kicked an addiction and has totally turned their lives around because of a personal spiritual transformation.

But it disqualifies him from office, as addiction is a lifelong disease. The risk, under stress (which any president will face) of relapse, is also incredibly high.

Simply can’t take chances of having a Nero as president, either.

 
 
 

Comment by IndayHill | 2008-05-20 00:10:37

musicalnotes, Wise & intelligent Americans will vote for issues and will vote for SENATOR HILLARY CLINTON. SHE IS A HARD WORKING PUBLIC SERVANT FOR MANY YEARS!SHE HAS NO STINKING GARBAGE ! HILLARY IS THE NEXT PRESIDENT!!!
Obama is dangerous !!

 

Comment by PssttCmere | 2008-05-20 00:14:55

I guess then obama followers are not issue voters because they sure lap it up anytime the obama camp smears Hillary or plays the race card. Perhaps you should tell obama you don’t like gutter politics, so he can stop engaging in them.

 

Comment by kenoshaMarge | 2008-05-20 06:18:17

“Thinking Americans” as well as “well-informed Americans” could never support a candidate like Obama. A campaign based on hope and change and tells us little of substance. Perhaps because there is little of substance in the candidate?

His ability to “inspire” is truly phenomenal. Especially since there is so little that is inspirational and so much that is just Madison Avenue. But we all knew you could fool some of the people all of the time and that would be the Obama supporters.

Thinking Americans also don’t allow someone else to tell them how to vote and who to vote vote. We’re funny that way.

A thinking American, that really wanted to help their candidate wouldn’t be annoying the people at another candidates Blog.

(Didn’t you get the memo meathead, Obama says you are supposed to be “nice” to Hillary supporters. That he had to tell you that and that you still insist on annoying Hillary supporters with your crap says a lot about both him and you.)

Thinking Americans? That would not be you.

 
 

Comment by Gregoryp | 2008-05-19 23:13:44

I don’t think he is a current user and I believe he overstated if not outright lied in his autobiography about his drug use. I think he is so used to playing up to stereotypes that he thought it would help him curry up to the AA community that comprises up his constituency in Illinois. Unfortunately if he did use those drugs the long term effects are not entirely clear. Some people can habitually use these things and seemingly suffer no consequences while other people can use something once with devestating life consequences.

Comment by Hope | 2008-05-19 23:47:53

Gregory
Show us the medical studies reporting that people can habitually use drugs without suffering consequences?

Do you mean to say that people addicted to such as heroin or meth suffer no physical consequences?

I want to see ONE study that supports your statement.

Comment by Gregoryp | 2008-05-20 00:04:04

Actually, I wasn’t trying to imply that at all. I believe if you use either of those substances just once then you will be changed forever. I was thinking more along the lines of cocaine which can kill some people after using it once. But you are right, once a person becomes dependent on a drug their brain is changed forever. I also wasn’t thinking of any studies but some of my family members own battles with drugs several of whom are in prison as I type this. For what it is worth I did take toxicology as a biology grad student but I am certainly not current on it as I am not interested in the subject.

 
 
 

Comment by Margaret | 2008-05-20 07:48:10

Heck, that could explain ALL of his behavior. Along with addiction comes delusions of grandeur and extraordinary narcissim. This is true whether the addict is currently using or not.

 
 

Comment by standard | 2008-05-19 23:03:29

doesn’t extensive drug use lead to brain deterioration later on?

Comment by Tom Plumb | 2008-05-19 23:14:39

it was teh arguement Rezko’s defense used agaisnt Stuart Levine, ie, he is not credible beacuse of his drug use.

Instead maybe it’s time for the Democratic party to let in some fresh new blood such as 32 year old Rep. Patrick McHenry from North Carolina or 21 year old superdelegate Jason Rae. They clearly have the fresh ideas and the experience garnered from years of videogaming to figure out which buttons to press to vote on crucial issues.

Don’t laugh, much of the Iraq war was planned around this premise, morons who game.

Certain people never could see the negatives.

They also think trolling is effective, too…

LOL

Comment by John | 2008-05-20 06:39:11

I love the assumption that because a person is “young,” that person must have “fresh ideas.”

Many young people I know couldn’t find an idea unless you placed it in the refrigerator or wrapped it around their IPod.

 
 

Comment by ndree | 2008-05-19 23:38:19

For sure it does…My sister who is an RN often remarks on his black lips, frequent tiredness and lapses of memory as sure signs of the side effects of extensive drug use.

Comment by Adrienne Grey | 2008-05-20 04:04:56

Smoking’s not good for your brain either. He didn’t stop that long ago, did he?

*****A

 
 

Comment by SueB. | 2008-05-19 23:54:36

standard,
Why yes, it does. Just look at W. (if you can stand it)

BTW, full moon out tonight. Explains alot. ;)

 
 
 

Comment by **Typical* Bitter* White* Sweetie** | 2008-05-19 23:22:49

 

Comment by **Typical* Bitter* White* Sweetie** | 2008-05-19 23:24:26

E-mail Alan Colmes of FOX now!!!!

——————————————————————————–

Alan Colmes on FOX says he wants to “see” the people that are going to vote for McCain if Hillary isn’t the nominee. PLS POST IT ON all the pro-Hillary websites and ask people to e-mail him NOW!

colmes@foxnews.com

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2008-05-20 11:26:16

I would rather blindside these igits.

 
 
 

Comment by President Hillary Clinton will defeat Obama and his troll army! | 2008-05-19 22:10:32

The trolls like their master Obama consistently apply a double standard. They decry racism and are the racists themselves: calling Bill Clinton a racist when he is not a racist makes the trolls and Obama the actual racists. They are ageist against McCain and discrimination is discrimination, you can’t pick and chose what is acceptable to discriminate against. They are sexist against Hillary and her female supporters. Obama and his trolls are despicable human beings and should not be surprised we have been working our asses off to defeat them. And we will defeat every single one of them.

Comment by Gregoryp | 2008-05-19 22:58:34

I’ve always lived by the creed that anybody can be discriminated against at any time. All it takes is the right set of circumstances. As a people we should never accept it in any form because of the sheer insidiousness discrimination represents. And we should never, ever tolerate discrimination just to prop up ourselves which is exactly what the DNC, Obama and the media have done here. Getting people to support you through engendering hate is one of the oldest, sickest and vilest forms of politics ever practiced. It diminishes all of us greatly.

Comment by President Hillary Clinton will defeat Obama and his troll army! | 2008-05-19 23:02:26

Agreed. In the last century we had vast genocide from exactly that type of behavior. People need to wake up. This might be the most important reason we have to stop Obama. We just can’t afford to go that route in America. It is dangerous slippery slope.

Comment by Tom Plumb | 2008-05-19 23:16:28

This century, too.

Darfur, Kenya et al…

Comment by President Hillary Clinton will defeat Obama and his troll army! | 2008-05-20 07:17:46

Good point. I wanted to make an older historic reference but you are correct.

 
 
 

Comment by Hope | 2008-05-19 23:57:54

Gregory

I applaud your values, but sometimes one has to discriminate in order to survive in this world.

 
 
 

Comment by Shainzona | 2008-05-19 22:11:49

So funny - and sadly true. Maybe you’re onto something here!

 

Comment by Dakinikat | 2008-05-19 22:15:13

nah, i’m a professor, i recognize the symptoms of not doing your homework … obama appears to be one of THOSE the staff ate my homework types … remember his debate performance? His brain’s on the teleprompter. He doesn’t do his homework!

Comment by President Hillary Clinton will defeat Obama and his troll army! | 2008-05-19 22:47:37

And does not deserve to hold the office of president. Hillary commands the issues and makes him look like amateur hour.

Comment by ndree | 2008-05-19 23:41:43

GWB redux. Remember the bump on GWBs back during the debates? Rumor had it he was being prompted by his handlers!
God, do we REALLY have to go thru’ this…is there no answer to this collective madness?

 
 

Comment by AnninCA | 2008-05-19 23:55:32

*nodding vigorously in agreement!*

The best description of this race was between the casual bad boy who charmed his way and didn’t do the real work and the prissy girl whose hand always flew up because she had over-prepared.

 
 

Comment by ritamary | 2008-05-19 22:16:46

OT Women are calling in to the Alan Colmes radio show right now saying they will vote for McCain if Obama is the nominee. He appears to be genuinely stunned and amazed! He is saying he doesn’t believe these women are Democrats. An Obamazoid caller has already accused these women of being racists. You can call him or email him. I already emailed him.

Comment by President Hillary Clinton will defeat Obama and his troll army! | 2008-05-19 22:26:27

Typical response, to deny people their voices by accusing them of being Republicans and racists. This type of behavior is not expected in a free society. Apparently the Obama supporters want a totalitarian country to live in under the tyrannical rule of their deity Obama.

Fortunately Hillary is still in the race and her winning is imperative to save our democracy from Obamablivion.

These Obama thought police can go fuck themselves.

Comment by Linda C. | 2008-05-19 22:36:48

We have not had our Obotamy yet. Beware, they will come for you..run run run

Comment by President Hillary Clinton will defeat Obama and his troll army! | 2008-05-19 22:39:43

Whomever called them the pod people is spot on. This election is about something way bigger than the nomination. The pod people have to be stopped from succeeding.

Comment by Hope | 2008-05-19 23:20:50

I’ve got pod people in my family. It is quite scary.

Comment by AnninCA | 2008-05-19 23:57:15

lol*….you guys are so funny. Pod people. Actually, I think my son who voted for Hillary has been taken over by the Pod People. I love him anyway.

Comment by Hope | 2008-05-20 00:01:03

Annin

I have a pod son also. I have an elderly pod mother and pod father. I am happy they are not pod challenged as am I. It is difficult to travel the times without the proper podpiece. I am sore from my travels.

 
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by standard | 2008-05-19 23:05:28

Yikes - fox might start pushing Obama, if they think it’ll get McCain more votes.

 

Comment by Musical Notes | 2008-05-19 23:15:12

Well they are. Just ADMIT IT for God’s sake. A REAL DEMOCRAT would never vote for another neocon after 8 years of Bush.

http://www.Bush-McCainChallenge.com

Comment by Hope | 2008-05-19 23:22:17

Musical Notes
Who in the hell are you to say who is a REAL Democrat and who is not? No one in here cares about your definition of political correctness. It would behoove you to find another place to spread your virus. We are immune here.

 

Comment by AnninCA | 2008-05-20 00:06:19

I know I’m a real Democrat because I’ve voted straight Democrat for over 30 years. I’ve earned that bragging right.

However, I have completely changed my thinking as the result of this race. I now believe I was a bit lazy in researching, I dismissed some very fine people because of partisanship, and I’m starting to be comfortable with my new-found Independent status.

Everyone has a chance with me these days, and it will all depend on the person’s proven record, history, etc.

I do admit that I think I’m in a much better position to be a responsible Democrat than I would have been in earlier years. I know just enough, at least, to not get caught up in the silly crap.

But the important stuff is really important. And what’s important is a result of judgment based on experience in being a voter.

Comment by so saddened | 2008-05-20 00:26:02

you are so correct, ann.

i’ve voted dem for 4 decades, generally without giving it much thought - just the i’m a dem and my family have been dems for generations kind of thing.

no more blind loyalty. the party is not loyal to me. now anyone who wants my vote has to earn it. and party identification won’t add any points - they have to earn it on their own.

 

Comment by ChrisXP | 2008-05-20 08:22:49

Everyone has a chance with me these days, and it will all depend on the person’s proven record, history, etc.

Best way to vote. Most qualified; best values; most innovative, etc. etc..

But Independent voting requires research, and the ability to read past partisan talking points (each side wants his/her candidate to look good, even if they stink like high hell).

I get a kick of mixed ticket voting. Get literature from both parties, despite I’m not a member of any. ;)

 
 

Comment by Gaylen | 2008-05-20 03:35:33

No self respecting woman should wish or work for the success of a party that ignores her self.

 

Comment by Ulahane | 2008-05-20 08:14:44

From the American Heritage Dictionary

“Democrat: One who believes in social equality or discounts distinctions in rank”

Therefore anyone who accepts distinctions of rank (e.g. “Those undereducated hicks shouldn’t count”) is not a real Democrat. Now which side does this remind you of? Obamabots are neolibs, not democrats!

 
 
 

Comment by greg | 2008-05-19 22:18:07

How many of these statements will appear in Republican ads if Obama gets the appointed the Democratic nominee? How will Obama defend this record against the Republican onslaught? My guess is that he will plead “please stop - this is what is wrong with America and this is why people hate politics - this is old style politics of personal destruction, etc.” We need Hope and Change and blah, blah. Can he sell hope and change with this record? Hello McGovern.

Comment by troll free zone | 2008-05-19 22:44:18

what’s the going price for an ounce of hope, do you think?
I wonder if anybody’s done any research into the up-swell in the market for crank and the obamaphiles crazed behavior?
Seems like I haven’t heard anything about crank lately–perhaps because i can’t watch the polluted news– but it used to be a big, big story.
And the behavior of this little c***s*****
so violent and on the edge and hyper seems pretty methamphetamine-ish to me. I mean a caffeine jag will only go so far, won’t it?

Comment by troll free zone | 2008-05-19 22:45:22

sorry, should read “these little….”

 
 

Comment by scott | 2008-05-19 22:53:59

I still can’t figure out where he comes up with the slogan of CHANGE. He is in Washington NOW, he is part of the problem he’s pretending he’s going to fix.

Comment by President Hillary Clinton will defeat Obama and his troll army! | 2008-05-19 22:56:31

Axelrod used that for Deval Patrick I recall. It’s a meaningless slogan for pod people.

Comment by Ulahane | 2008-05-20 08:22:12

Virtually every non-incumbant politician uses hope and change as slogans.

Bush in 2000:

“And we will extend the promise of prosperity to every forgotten corner of this country: to every man and woman, a chance to succeed; to every child, a chance to learn; and to every family, a chance to live with dignity and hope.”

“But America’s way is the rising road. This nation is daring and decent and ready for change.”

 
 

Comment by Hope | 2008-05-19 23:49:44

Scott,
He means he wants his diapers CHANGED!

Comment by Ulahane | 2008-05-20 08:23:47

LOL. Or he HOPES he has enough CHANGE for the soft-drink machine.

 
 
 

Comment by Whatever | 2008-05-19 23:41:36

He’ll say, “they’re off limits.”

 

Comment by AnninCA | 2008-05-20 00:08:31

That’s all he CAN say. He has no real defense.

And we already know those of us who went through this primary aren’t listening. We got the chant down. And Republicans aren’t going to care.

The press? Maybe they’ll report it, but it will serve only to reinforce his persona as someone who is whiny and plays the race card when cornered.

Everyone is going to have his number by the time they vote.

 
 

Comment by President Hillary Clinton will defeat Obama and his troll army! | 2008-05-19 22:19:07

MEMO: Mission Accomplished? Not so fast.

While Obama Camp Moves to End Campaign Before South Dakotans Voices are Heard, Clinton Campaign Accepts McGovern Proposal

I doubt Obama would accept. And I understand why Hillary would do this. She has some stomach. You’ll understand when you read.

 

Comment by Doreena | 2008-05-19 22:29:46

Hey, I’m doing some research into an article and was hoping some of you could help me. This is about the group Clinton Supporters Count Too, out of Columbus, OH. The one led by Cynthia Ruccia and Jamie Dixey. I need to verify some things they’ve said online. Here are my questions:

- Is Cynthia dot48?

- Is Jamie curiosityhasme?

Oh, and is Cynthia still a ward leader in Bexley?

I’m going to be quoting them based on postings here and at taylormarsh and, of course, hillaryis44, and I just want to make sure I have my facts triple verified before we go to press.

Thanks in advance!

:)

Comment by President Hillary Clinton will defeat Obama and his troll army! | 2008-05-19 22:36:02

You should contact them directly before quoting them I would think, to verify those quotes actually were posted by them.

 

Comment by 1950democrat | 2008-05-19 23:11:55

doreena,

NOT SO FAST!

Bravo for Cynthia and Jamie, but they aren’t dot48 or curiosity or any of the regular posters at hillaryis44 or at taylormarsh! If they were, they’d be talking about their project there.

H44 has put up a page giving CSCT appearences, so H44 is supporting them (as are most of us posters). We’d love to have them posting at H44.

CSCT doesn’t seem to have any web presence yet. If it were any of us, we’d have had a website up and been promoting it long ago.

There’s discussion of the idea at clintondems.com, particularly a related project “Payable to Hillary OR McCain.” To show DNC now, before it’s too late, that we are serious about defecting, we’re going to write donation checks with Payee: Hillary Clinton Campaign OR John McCain Campaign and send the checks to various reliable people to count and hold till the nomination is decided. Then if Hillary is the nominee, the checks will be mailed to her; otherwise they will be mailed to McCain.

For more about related projects, see http://www.ironmyvote.com/neverobama.htm

 

Comment by Hope | 2008-05-19 23:25:18

Doreena
I saw Ruccia (sp) on Fox News with, I believe, the other woman to whom you are referring.

I would think you could Google them, or perhaps go to Fox News site and see if you can’t track them down there.

Comment by Doreena | 2008-05-19 23:37:17

No, the other woman wasn’t Ms. Dixey (I don’t think she’s made any televised appearances like Ruccia). As it turns out, I got my final confirmation and contact information (yes, those are their handles, so they are at H44!), so I’m all set, thanks! And I’ll check out http://www.ironmyvote.com/neverobama.htm to see if there’s something realted to this or future stories. Good luck!

 
 
 

Comment by troll free zone | 2008-05-19 22:36:00

Is there such a catch phrase as
“implausible deniability?” Because I really think Barack would be the poster child for it.

Great post. Thanks.

Comment by President Hillary Clinton will defeat Obama and his troll army! | 2008-05-19 22:36:45

“implausible deniability?”

There is now.

 
 

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-05-19 22:43:29

I’m starting to really like this tv station!
Mondo Stars Poll Results
“Barack Obama has not accomplished anything in his life.”
True
174/53%
False
155/47%
Votes: 329
KGW TV8 This is Oregon!

“We don’t think (Oregon) is a 20-point win for Obama, but it’s likely high single digits, eight or nine percent, and it could be above that,” he said. “I am confident about the outcome; it’s just a question of the margin and who brings out their vote.”

WE’LL SEE!

Comment by Musical Notes | 2008-05-19 23:19:44

I’m betting on a 10 point win in Oregon for Obama & 35 point win for Clinton in Kentucky.

Comment by Nicole | 2008-05-19 23:34:15

Yeah, didn’t you claim that last night, as well? (But using a different moniker, of course.)

 
 
 

Comment by JoeySky | 2008-05-19 22:44:16

Obama also knows that there is the great lake somewhere in Oregon.

And he also promise to take care of Pennsylvania veteran in Oregon, but not the other way around.

Comment by Nicole | 2008-05-19 23:36:27

Yes, and there was that speech he gave recently, on the campaign trail and documented by a British journalist, in which he recounted the tale of his hardscrabble (hardly!) beginnings, and then repeated it verbatim 10 minutes later.

 
 

Comment by President Hillary Clinton will defeat Obama and his troll army! | 2008-05-19 22:44:52

You guys notice only certain topics get a lot of pod people attention?

This clues us in where their vulnerabilities are. That “Whitey” video thread sure scares the living crap out of them.

They don’t seem to care too much when we expose them for their racism, sexism, ageism and all of that. But that video thread really pisses them off. Good.

Comment by HARP | 2008-05-19 23:22:23

They should be nervous. That video is like kryptonite to the pods.,

Comment by Nicole | 2008-05-19 23:41:47

My theory is that there’s just a handful of trolls patrolling most nights, but they keep changing their monikers to suggest there’s an army of Obamatots instead. Tonight, there’s only one: Musical Notes. He/she’s slowly making his/her way through the posts and comments.

Comment by Hope | 2008-05-20 00:04:31

Nicole,

They are like a virus that changes its outer code when it infests the host cell. It is difficult to identify them when they mutate.

 

Comment by ChrisXP | 2008-05-20 08:32:49

Public last 4 digits of their IP, can identify them quick. Especially good in tracking them to large offices and college campuses. It’s better than the first 6, as that’s network octets, and so huge to track down.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by brandy | 2008-05-19 22:47:10

Rita–I emailed him too, and I’m getting my friends to do so as well.

Let’s bombard his inbox!

Please if you have the time and the inclination, let Alan Colmes know that you do not intend on voting for Obama in the GE.

colmes@foxnews.com

Comment by President Hillary Clinton will defeat Obama and his troll army! | 2008-05-19 22:54:10

Obama is going to blow a gasket between now and the convention with millions of democrats (”racists” and “republicans” according to the trolls) telling the nation they will never vote for him. He’s lost the base