RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Enough

It’s hard to post when your bloggy compatriots are doing such an able job of covering and analyzing the salient points of what’s amounting to be a debacle, but after last night I thought it was time to emerge from my bunker and have at it.

What we’re looking at here is one of the most blatantly dishonest, rigged elections seen in any country in recent years, including (fill in the name of a banana republic here). You thought Lyndon Johnson’s ballot box 13 episode stunk? Or that the Florida recount was a travesty? Well pull up a chair, folks, and get a good look at Election 2008.

This is not the ranting of a bitter, gun-clutching, God-lovin’ Obama hater. This is fact.

Florida and Michigan are still unaccounted for. Repeat: There is still no solution to the Florida and Michigan mess. Oh sure, Howard Dean promises to “do” something, but all that we’ve seen is that in this case inaction IS action; keeping Florida and Michigan out of the calculus is achieving the goald that so many in the party and press long for.

And yet, and yet. Despite features with adorable, fair and balanced titles like “Hillary Deathwatch”, the senator CONTINUES to blow Obama out of the water in key states. And no, she’s not Reanimator. She’s what we in the biz call “a candidate” participating in a thing called a “campaign”, where you don’t throw in the towel until all the goddamned votes are counted and there’s a clear winner. And what a nudnick her husband is! Only an insufferable blowhard would say the following about the Florida and Michigan mess:

“The Democrats said, ‘We’re going to decapitate them, smudge them, step on them, act like they never existed, act like they never voted,’” the former president said. “It’s very strange that the Democrats would be more authoritarian and more hostile to the voters.”

Good God! Who does this man think he is?? But then again, according to the Obamatrons, he’s just a racist anyway so whatever he says is driven by his twisted, KKK-mindset.

Just think about what happened after Florida 2000. Michael Moore became a gajillionaire. The Democrats becamed the wronged party, the party that stands for one-person-one-vote. Now Michael Moore is uncharacteristically silent on the subject of enfranchisement and Democratic leaders are shrugging their shoulders or, in the case of Donna Brazile, sending out unhinged e-mails to critics. We’ve come a long way, baby.

And for those of you who are bitchslapping Larry for speaking the truth, well, screw you. If he was a standup guy for, well, standing up for Valerie Plame and calling bullshit on Iraq, well then maybe, just maybe, you oughta give him the benefit of the doubt on this politics thing. They taught him a lot of cool stuff at the Farm besides how to stalk and kill people (not that I would know first hand that this is what they teach at that place, but I saw The Recruit).

Meanwhile, the DNC plans to empty the clown car hold a meeting of the rules committee on May 31 to decide…something. Maybe when to meet next. Or what sort of snacks should be provided in the VIP skyboxes in Denver.

And what, may I ask, will they decide that couldn’t have been arrived at weeks, if not months, ago? And what exactly constitutes a “fair solution” to this problem? A do-over? How about handing all the delegates over to Obama outright, and canceling the upcoming matches in Puerto Rico, Montana and South Dakota and calling it a day? Or how about turning over all of Hillary’s delegates won in contests that “aren’t important”, like races in hillbilly states?

Nothing would surprise me at this point. Except, of course, for a fair, equitable solution where voters are enfranchised and the delegates are apportioned fairly and small-d democratically. But the fix is in. Don’t hold your breath.

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post472 Comments »

Comment by **== President Hillary Clinton **== | 2008-05-21 13:16:07

We have a week to scream bloody murder at the DNC at turn the heat up so high they have to do the right thing.

I am very optimistic if we stay focused we can get them to do what they should have done all along.

I appreciate the reality of the situation but we have it within our power to change the outcome.

Keep fighting your ass off. Victory is within reach. Naysayers beware.

Comment by Nancy Sabet | 2008-05-21 13:28:46

Obama has turned out to be one of the most divisive political figures since Nixon.The candidate who said he has this great talent for unifying people, a talent that shows up nowhere in his past, has created more divisiveness in the Democratic party than any figure in history.But the issue that has caused one of the most serious divisions is the one that Obama himself has created over race.
In CNN last night reporter said, that Obama comes here in Iowa, but very different from when he started here; he has managed to crush the huge Democratic Party machine, the Clintons..well it says it all, I wonder what the Republicans thinking of it..bravo BHO!!

Comment by Kourian | 2008-05-21 13:51:58

Obama has turned out to be one of the most divisive political figures since Nixon.

Actually his rhetoric is a lot like Nixon’s too. We were watching the Sack O’ Shit on the telly the other night and someone said ‘who does he remind you of?’ And after a while we got it: Nixon.

He also has the same attitude about him as if he’s saying to himself ‘this is going to be easy - people are stupid’.

Comment by ChrisXP | 2008-05-21 15:24:56

How about taking your “telly”, and going back with it across the pond?

This is American politics, not Communist/Marxist/Socialist ideology your country has been practicing since the 1920s.

Comment by Lou | 2008-05-21 18:56:17

THIS COMMENT IS RUDE AND UNDESVERVING.
ARE YOU CRANKY?

 

Comment by wry | 2008-05-21 23:32:05

why so nasty? We’re not blogger boyz here.

 
 

Comment by terri | 2008-05-21 16:51:33

You mean the same smirky attitude GWB had? Yup, he’s the Democrats’ GWB–Manchurian Candidate.

What a sad state this country is in.

 
 

Comment by Donald from Hawaii | 2008-05-21 14:31:26

“Obama has turned out to be one of the most divisive political figures since Nixon.”

Let’s cool the hyperbole here. That statement is nonsensical on its face, since it clearly doesn’t take into account one George W. “Mission Accomplished” Bush.

I’m not excusing the race-baiting we’ve seen from the Obama campaign, nor do I make light of the open misogyny expressed by the so-called mainstream media with regards to Sen. Hillary Clinton’s historic run. But as campaigns go, Sen. Barack Obama really has nothing on the amoral conduct of the current White House squatter and his scumbag cronies the Bush administration.

The Clinton campaign’s failure to effectively contest Obama in small states holding caucuses instead of primaries is what accounts for the current differential in the delegate count.

They didn’t even try out here in Hawaii, opting to pick as Clinton’s state chair the State Senate president, who was more interested in garnering the title for her political resume than doing anything substantive, like maybe organizing the precincts. In fact, the day before the February 19 caucuses, she blithely predicted a statewide turnout of no more than 6,000 Democrats.

Instead, 40,000 people showed up - including over 10,00o Clinton supporters who pretty much came out on their own as individuals. By taking 20 of the 29 delegates, the Obama campaign picked up a net advantage of 11 in Hawaii alone, which pretty much offsets Clinton’s subsequent gains in the April 22 Pennsylvania primary.

There will be plenty of time to do a post-mortem after the convention. But for now, suffice to sy that the Clinton campaign under Mark Penn’s helm was never seriously prepared at the outset for a vigorously contested primary campaign, and were both outhustled and out-organized by the Obama campaign.

Rather, it is a testament to the candidate herself and her subsequent campaign manager, Maggie Williams, that they were not blown completely out of the water in the month following “Super Tuesday” on February 5, but instead rallied to make a valiant run for the nomination despite the daunting financial and logitical advantages enjoyed by the Obama campaign.

All that said, it’s not over. Tony Rezko’s fate in his Chicago corruption trial has to be decided by the federal jury, and the politicaal fallout from a “guilty” verdict is yet to be known. Despite the plaintive wailing of the Obama-friendly media, Sen. Clinton scored three smashing victories in succession in Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Kenticky despite being outspent by margins of 3:1. There has been no stampede of superdelegates as of yet.

So, let’s just see how this plays out, do our best to support Hillary Clinton in the homestretch here, and then go from there.

Comment by Cindy | 2008-05-21 14:45:58

Hey, Donald. You happen to be wrong. Obama is VERY much like Nixon. I lived in D.C. during the early ’70’s and saw it firsthand (and had a friend who worked in the White House).
Seeing what this Chicagobama mob has done to Hillary, esp. through the media, is so Nixonian it’s not funny.

Comment by Donald from Hawaii | 2008-05-21 18:10:33

I never said that Obama’s campaign didn’t bear a vague resemblance to Nixon’s campaigns. Please don’t put words in my mouth.

I merely said that the previous post, by stating that Obama was the worst since Nixon, obviously failed to take into account the current occupant in the White House.

Look, I don’t care for Barack Obama, and I’m not here to defend his campaign. But to insinuate that he’s worse than George W. Bush is just nonsense.

Comment by terri | 2008-05-21 18:54:29

He is behaving exactly like George W. Bush and he hasn’t even gotten the nomination yet. If you want to see what an Obama WH would look like see Gov. Rod Blagojovich (sp)–soon to be joining the list of IL governors learning a new trade in the Big House. Big Buds, same fund-raisers, same campaign manager and tied to the corrupt Daley machine big time.

 
 
 

Comment by Northwest rain | 2008-05-21 14:56:46

Shut up troll.

Here he is again folks — Obama’s explainer.

Now we get a dose of well — why don’t we vote for snObama blah blah balh

Hey stupid — go away.

Comment by Donald from Hawaii | 2008-05-21 18:05:32

Why don’t you grow up?

Where exactly in my post did I say that I supported Obama?

If you can’t handle yourself in a political discussion without resorting to name-calling tantrums, then you’re a goddamned fool who offers absolutely nothing in the way of substance to either this conversation or the Clinton campaign, and you’ll what you truly deserve in this life.

Aloha, fool.

 
 

Comment by swannyj | 2008-05-21 15:15:41

Being from Texas, I am forced to acknowledge HRC AND the voting public were not prepared for the impact of the caucuses. This seems to be the case in other states as well. However, this just highlights the majority of Obama’s delegates were not and are not the reflection of the popular vote. I can also attest to the fraud that went on during the Texas caucus. Caucuses disenfranchise voters.

I am very thankful the HRC was able to regroup and gather their strength to press on. Hillary is now leading in the popular vote and this lead DOES reflect actual votes. ALL THE WAY TO THE CONVENTION!

Comment by Donald from Hawaii | 2008-05-21 19:00:26

Your observation about the caucus system is spot-on. It’s a misguided notion that caucuses somehow reflects popular will. Despite the large turnout here in Hawaii last February, I’m convinced that had we held a primary election, such an event would have attracted upwards of a half-million voters to the polls.

Isn’t there a lawsuit being filed in Texas regarding the overt mishandling of the caucuses there?

 
 

Comment by ChrisXP | 2008-05-21 15:29:52

Let’s cool the hyperbole here. That statement is nonsensical on its face, since it clearly doesn’t take into account one George W. “Mission Accomplished” Bush.

Huh? Nixon is what made McGovern possible, and in return, why America didn’t vote for him.

Don’t you know anything about history — or did you shoot dupe in class, instead?

Bush never came close to the Nixon on outright polarization in this country — unless you live in San Francisco or Berkeley, where even saying God would be “FASCIST!!” lololol

Comment by SirScud | 2008-05-21 15:55:54

Yet another closeted conservative outs themself with hate speech! Just thought I’d take the opportunity to “shoot a dupe!”

Comment by ChrisXP | 2008-05-21 16:08:54

I’m not in the closet, dimwit, I’m out and about and damn proud, too. Every regular here know it, even. :)

Nub.

Now go back home to your Black racists, and make sure to get your shackles ready. I’m sure the New Plantation owners will be needing new slaves!

Comment by Nellie | 2008-05-21 21:56:20

Chris,

Scud is one of the Plantation owners who was at the fundraiser for Obama in Marin County California - The same one where Obama dubbed us bitter, gun toting, Bible Clinging people.

 
 
 

Comment by Donald from Hawaii | 2008-05-21 18:38:41

Mahalo for offering your ignorant opinion on behalf of the “Hee-Haw” caucus.

 

Comment by terri | 2008-05-21 18:50:22

I remember the Nixon races and at that time the level of vitriol and polarization associated with George W. Bush was unheard of.

 
 

Comment by Bill Delyon | 2008-05-21 16:11:46

Thanks for that reasoned thoughtful post Donald.

 

Comment by cows4us | 2008-05-21 16:45:49

Oh wow - incredible thinking DNC - giving a state like Hawaii (where Obama was born) that has only 4 electoral votes the same say as a state like PA with 21 electoral votes. Not to mention Hillary winning the state by 200,000 votes! (That’s many times more than HI). Why? Could it be b/c Hillary has roots in Scranton, PA? No - couldn’t be, it’s just stupid DNC rules and that’s why we keep losing for the last 40 years! Anyone who defends this stupid system is undemocratic and should move to a banana republic where’s they’ll fit right in.

Comment by Donald from Hawaii | 2008-05-21 18:31:07

This has nothing to do with state populations. It has everything to do with the overall delegate count. Quit the dick-swinging, and do the math.

By failing to contest the caucus in a small state like Hawaii, which has only 29 delegates, the Clinton campaign incurred a deficit of 11 delegates when all was said and done on February 19.

And for all the hard work she put into winning the April 22 Pennsylvania primary, that inspiring victory garnered for her only 10 more pledged delegates from that state than for Obama.

Add the pledged delegate counts from the two states together, and Clinton is still down one delegate. That’s why Hawaii cancels out Pennsylvania.

And that’s also why it was a foolish decision on Mark Penn’s part to concentrate precious campaign resources on the bigger states, and cede the small states to the Obama campaign. Just add the differentials of Hawaii, Alaska, Idaho, Kansas and North Dakota together, and Hillary’s in the hole by over 50 delegates. Even if you add the Clinton-positive differentials of Ohio, Pennsylvania and California together, she still doesn’t make up that deficit.

Now, I happen to agree that we need to re-think how we choose our nominees, because I do believe that the big states and swing states should be factored into the decision, and that Hillary Clinton is in fact the stronger candidate against John McCain. But by dismissing the small states and the role they have under the current rules, Mark Penn proved himself to be merely a grossly overpaid political dumbbell.

Comment by ChrisXP | 2008-05-21 18:34:37

This has nothing to do with state populations. It has everything to do with the overall delegate count. Quit the dick-swinging, and do the math.

Hehehe!

Obama Math:
——————-

A famous mathematical physicst von Neumann said “If you allow me four free parameters I can build a mathematical model that describes exactly everything that an elephant can do. If you allow me a fifth free parameter, the model I build will forecast that the elephant will fly.”

Comment by Donald from Hawaii | 2008-05-21 18:48:19

And von Neumann’s observation about physics is relevant to the Democratic nomination process - how?

Look, I didn’t write the rules here. Frankly, I don’t like them any more than you do. But it is what it is, and things don’t necessarily have to make sense to still be very real. I prefer to have my feet on the ground, and deal with that reality, rather than console and / or delude myself with visions of what could and ought to be if I had my druthers.

Regardless, this nomination will be decided by the superdelegates, because neither candidate will have garnered the sufficient number to cross the threshold with pleadged delegates alone.

As the famous American philosopher Yogi Berra once said, “It ain’t over ’til its over!”

 
 
 

Comment by PssttCmere | 2008-05-21 20:33:37

Well, I wish obama had been born four years earlier and we wouldn’t even have to deal with him…

 
 

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-05-21 17:15:12

Great post…and on the money. And I agree with you, too, that Maggie and getting rid of Penn was the key to the turnaround.

I also personally think that’s why she’s steely now. She feels responsible in a way for the way this has gone down.

Now we get to see the real Hillary. She’s fabulous. Too bad it didn’t happen earlier.

Comment by ProfessionalMom | 2008-05-21 20:33:25

She has ALWAYS been fabulous, brilliant, responsive, and responsible; people don’t see when their eyes are closed. I’ve been crazy about her from DAY 1. But then, I’m from Arkansas, and I’ve worked with her. There is no better person to be President of these United States.

You go, Hillary!!!!!

 
 
 
 

Comment by alibe4-Hillary | 2008-05-21 14:18:16

I have called the DNC and asked them why they haven’t held a press conference to make sure the facts are out there. They are so defensive it is almost funny. All they say is that they are having this meeting on the 31st of May, but can’t say where or when. They are so busy trying to defend the indefensible that it is sickening. When you ask a question you can hear panic and desparation. It is hard to defend lies and a conspiracy to rig the primary system. I think we should all refer to the DNC as a conspiracy to rig this election. They should be sued by a group. Or charged with fraud. This can not be legal. I would like to hear Donna and Howard have to testify under oath!!!

Comment by terri | 2008-05-21 18:59:29

Unfortunately it has nothing to do with legality. The DNC is a private organization that can make it’s own rules. People don’t have to join. That said, I’m for Hillary going all the way to the convention. There’s nothing the DNC can do to stop her (and still themselves democrats). What’s needed in this country (after Hillary’s 8 years) is MORE political parties that give every American a voice. We’re the only first-world democracy that only has two parties. See how well that works out? You’ve got latte-drinking liberals in OR who don’t have to worry about the economy voting for an empty suit who will do nothing to help hard working Democrats in the swing states. Just a bad system, these people do not belong in the same party.

 
 
 

Comment by gigglechick | 2008-05-21 14:25:37

the MAP shows us that SHE can do it.

It’s the MAP, not the math.

by the way, the map was the inspiration for shirts & buttons

http://www.cafepress.com/gigglechick/5576515

(a portion of the proceeds from what I sell go to Hillary…)

 

Comment by Yes We Will! | 2008-05-21 14:26:28

Hillary wants us to vote Dem in November.

To do less dishonors her wisdom & her wishes.

Let’s be smart like Hillary and work to support the Dem nominee, whatever happens.

Hillary wants us to take this country back, and you never really supporter her values or her vision if you act like a paid troll McCainiac.

Hillary Knows Best!

Comment by Frank | 2008-05-21 14:32:50

Shut up. Fool.

Comment by Be smart like Hillary! | 2008-05-21 14:36:36

The ‘fools’ are those who reject Hillary’s wisdom.

If you won’t honor her voice and her insight, go back to Free Republic since you are obviously a paid McCainiac troll.

Real Hillary supporters will do the smart thing and vote Dem in Nov.

McBush’s third term is the real enemy.

Comment by Frank | 2008-05-21 14:38:58

Shut the fuck up, dipshit. I honor MY OWN VOICE and MY OWN BELIEFS and they do not, in any way, jive with Obama’s bastion of greed and narcissim. With your logic, all of Edwards’ supporters would have honored his idiotic decision to endorse Obama. How did that pan out?

 

Comment by Cindy | 2008-05-21 14:49:24

You are so Obama it stinks to high heaven. Obama people are so obvious.

 

Comment by speaktruth | 2008-05-21 15:28:30

I agree it would be awful for the country to have McCain as president.
However, it would be awful for the Democratic Party to have Obama. To me he is another Republican.
Our country is in such a terrible mess. It requires an especially strong, experienced and competent president. I have not have heard one specific idea from Obama about what he would do to fix this mess. Not one. There is nothing he has ever accomplished to give me confidence that he has any idea what to do. For me it’s not his associations that are the biggest problem. It’s that I’ve seen nothing to satisfy me at all that this guy has any idea what to do to fix the economy, which is our biggest problem.
That aside, I think he’d do more than McCain, just because he’s a Dem instead of Repub. McCain will just continue the robbery of the people by big business. I fear so will Obama, but it won’t be as blatant.
But if Obama gets in we’ll be telling Dem Party they can continue to ignore us, to continue to put up empty suit rock stars.
I don’t think they’ll allow Hillary to get the nomination at this point.
I still wonder about a third party. One that actually is strong, does something. How much chance is there that it could win with Hillary?

Comment by Hmmmm | 2008-05-21 20:40:21

Maybe, if the Democrats are so willing to lose the White House, we should consider throwing our coordinated strength behind McCain, IN RETURN FOR compromises from him on the issues we care about, like the Supreme Court, Iraq, healthcare, education, economy, etc. Remember, Abraham Lincoln was a Republican. We don’t have to be Democrats if the Democratic party won’t represent us, and would rather give away the White House to McCain than fight for it–and get nothing in return for the give-away.

 
 

Comment by Strawberrybitch | 2008-05-21 15:34:16

Are you for real? Go Away. You don’t have what it takes to be a concern troll. Go over to LGF and take a few lessons.

 

Comment by Strawberrybitch | 2008-05-21 15:50:31

This one is an especially patronizing little fuck, isn’t he folks?

 
 

Comment by Lester | 2008-05-21 15:35:46

Ditto!!!!!!!

 
 

Comment by so saddened | 2008-05-21 14:35:21

go away, repetitive troll. we saw hundreds of such posts last night.

hillary or mccain. no other option

Comment by Yes We Will! | 2008-05-21 14:46:27

Last night Hillary said:

That’s why I’m in this race: to fight for your future. And that’s why, whatever happens, I’ll work as hard as I can to elect a Democratic president this fall.

You know, the state motto of Kentucky is, “United we stand, divided we fall,” words that have a special place in our history. They inspire American revolutionaries to unite the colonies, to defy an empire, and create a new nation, to invent a new form of government, of the people, by the people, and for the people, and they bound our nation together in service and sacrifice, even in our darkest hours.

We will come together as a party, united by common values and common cause, united in service of the hopes and dreams that know no boundaries of race or creed, gender or geography. And when we do, there will be no stopping us.

We won’t just unite our party. We will unite our country and make sure America’s best years are still ahead of us.

Thank you. And God bless you, and God bless America.

You dishonor Hillary if you vote for McCain.

Then again, you are nothing but a paid McCainiac troll.

Hillary & I will take this country back for the Dem nominee without you.

Comment by Cindy | 2008-05-21 14:54:59

Hey “Yes We Will”,
We are WOMEN. Not stepford wives.
It’s Hillary or nothing.
But, nice try, wuss breath.

Comment by Lou | 2008-05-21 19:06:27

It’s Hillary or the highway.

Obama has made people hate him.
He is the most hated man in America today.

The trolls just make it appear that Obama has support. He really doesn’t.
trolls are paid hacks.

 
 

Comment by Ellen D. | 2008-05-21 14:57:24

How much does Obama pay you for this stuff?

Comment by Strawberrybitch | 2008-05-21 15:37:48

Ellen, not enough if you ask me. BARKY, needs to get his money back.

 
 

Comment by PDMM | 2008-05-21 15:13:20

Yes We Will, you are clearly a NObamabot troll, oh are you one of those 400 paid bloggers for Barry??? If you really believed in Hillary you would simply know that most of us will never vote for BO. He doesn’t deserve my vote. Like I said, Hillary may ask, but we don’t have to follow like freakin’ lemmings over the cliff. I have always voted for the person. And I am disgusted that BO is a Democrat. He disgusts me.

 

Comment by Uppity Woman | 2008-05-21 15:28:03

Hillary & I will take this country back for the Dem nominee without you.

Dear Yes We Will,

No You won’t.

Comment by Uppity Woman | 2008-05-21 15:29:07

We will take this party back AGAIN just like last time you off the cliffers tried this. We will take it back in four years. Then we will talk about Hillary again.

 
 

Comment by Strawberrybitch | 2008-05-21 15:36:16

She’s talking about herself. Christ. Get a clue, spanky.

 

Comment by apishapa | 2008-05-21 15:59:23

Fortunately for this country, unlike Obambots, Clinton supporters are by and large not robots. We think for ourselves. Though we support Hillary and are convinced she would be the best President for this country, we are not obligated to follow her every command. We respect her, but we disagree on this.

We oppose Obama for very good reasons and those reasons will not go away. It is not just that we like Hillary better (we do), but we truly feel an Obama Presidency would be a catastrophe for our nation. We are Americans first.

No matter who tells us different. He is a bad candidate and he would be a terrible President. I won’t vote for him. I don’t care who asks me to.

 

Comment by layla | 2008-05-21 17:08:35

Ha! I saw the speech, she actually said..elect a dem president, whomever SHE will be.

Obamabots, don’t you dare act now that you are giving Hillary credit for ANYTHING. Most of us are not voting for Obama no matter what. Deal with that and live with it in the bitter fall.

Most of your ilk said they would not have voted for Clinton either if it was reversed.

Comment by BJinChicago | 2008-05-21 18:19:44

Yes, whoever, she will be…

 
 
 

Comment by Sugar | 2008-05-21 15:09:04

That’s right! Hillary or McCain. There isn’t enough time in a year for Obama to change my mind and at this point, there are only about 5 months left to the general. So, if he is handed that nomination, this is one vote he can kiss goodbye!

 
 

Comment by Northwest rain | 2008-05-21 14:58:50

Do NOT speak for Hillary — TROLL.

GO TO HELL — Just like the jerk who claims to be from Hawaii — GO TO HELL.

 

Comment by PDMM | 2008-05-21 15:09:34

Hillary may ASK us to support BO IF he steals this nomination, HOWEVER it doesn’t mean we have to vote for a man so unqualified to be POTUS that it’s painful, not even funny. NObama. Never.

 

Comment by Tom Plumb | 2008-05-21 15:22:18

hey,troll boi, (really an old man) can you do an ascii finger?

psssst–

it’s the key…

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

 

Comment by Windy | 2008-05-21 15:32:46

Not happening!

 

Comment by Wyoming Dem | 2008-05-21 17:38:56

If Hillary called me personally on my cell phone and asked me to vote for Obama I would respectfully decline. I have already resigned from the Democratic Party (40 years of only voting Democrat…) Obama is an inexperienced, criminally associated, devisive and racist candidate and he will never, (DNC do you hear me???)NEVER get my vote. I am sick-to-death of hearing that bumbling baboon, Howard Dean and the absolutely rabid and caustic Donna Brazil state over and over and over again “the Clinton supports will get behind the nominee.” What freaking planet do these morons live on? They have no idea what is about to hit the Democratic party. Thousands, (and that is reality) of CLinton supporters plant to resign from the party on a specific date should the DNC nominate Obama. And while I am at it, I am sick of being called a racist simply because I see through the empty, devious and elitist suit that is Obama. I can think of at least 25 reasons not to vote for him and the color of his skin isn’t one of them.
Between the DNC and the mainstream media, Obama has been forced down the throats of voters and I simply refuse to swallow.

 

Comment by terri | 2008-05-21 19:02:48

The Obama should have smarter than to offend half of the voters in his own party. Americans don’t just GIVE candidates what they want, Americans expect candidates to earn their support. Oh that’s right, he’s black so if we don’t vote for him, we’re racists. He would have the distinction of being the first Affirmative Action nominee–don’t “interview” him to see if he’s qualified, just hand him the nomination based on his race.

 

Comment by PssttCmere | 2008-05-21 20:41:31

wow….how covert….NOT

 

Comment by Mike | 2008-05-21 20:51:21

Notice the English and phrasing of the trolls. Obama’s campaign has literally outsourced his trolling harassment force.

A few weeks ago encountered several in a blog, awakened a friend with an IP checker, he entered blog, found 4 Indian and Phillipino IPs.

Below 2 examples of confrontation:

Just for the record: Kizeem is not posting from a US ip., nor US time zone.

Probably not a US voter. Just “an out-sourced” Obama “harasser” as mentioned in the comment about the Obama “clog the blogs” posters.

Guess he/she works the mid-night shift!

Posted by: Mike | Apr 5, 2008 7:25:28 AM

To Mike,

You make me laugh. There is nothing like Obama outsource ‘harasser’, whatever you mean. For your info, I am going to be in PA on 4/22/08.

So, see you there.

Posted by: Kizeem | Apr 5, 2008 7:32:00 AM

 

Comment by Nellie | 2008-05-21 22:06:06

No Bama ever!

 

Comment by wry | 2008-05-21 23:42:06

Oh now we vote for Barack and his nasty low class wife to “honor Hillary”?

Bullshit. I honor myself and my country by voting against that fraud.

 
 

Comment by standard | 2008-05-21 16:08:48

AMEN!
Clinton WILL NOT lose because DNC f*ked up!

Tonight on Fox, Rove talks about the KY and OR election. I’m giving them my viewership because they have thus far provided the only balance in our primary.

Rove has been accurate- so far.
I’ll watch him, and hope that he continues avoiding partisan interest and manipulation.

 

Comment by LIBERTY IS FREEDOM | 2008-08-26 12:37:59

When I first discovered the word “CORPORACRACY”. It was like a shining light of truth on what you and your husband and prior Presidents had stretched the plasticity of the internal workings of population to achieve. The “DESTRUCTION” of “LIBERTY”.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You have stolen from the Retired Military personnel thru legislation You have lined America up for “advanced Socialism”. Your Party members (i.e. Rostenkowski did ignored violations of law by those who work in positions of authority).
Your regimes of government have caused overwhelming loss to me personally. Moreover, my pleas are shoved in my face and would be shoved up my as s if your authority agents could.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You have supported corrupt Judges who have made false entries in records. In addition, the list go’s on.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Citizens have no rights. Liberty has been diced. Your thought process needs to be adjusted in a Prison Camp. Then reintroduced to society thru Prison internment adjustment. Then a couple years of deplorable deprived existence in some desert Country, that lacks water.
Then, just maybe then, you could have some concept as to what “ induced oppression “ delivered from a psychopath is like.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Isn’t that interesting?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I scraped for what I have maybe it time for you to do some scraping. Let us discover who the criminals are?

 
 

Comment by jwrjr | 2008-05-21 13:16:57

And these idots at the DNC think that the voters of FL and MI will obediently vote for Obama after Dean anoints him.

Comment by Kourian | 2008-05-21 13:55:15

David Axelrod is an expert at marketing and opinion manipulation. He and his colleagues know people better than they know themselves. Do not underestimate the power of the Dark Side!

Comment by MessyMarcy | 2008-05-21 14:21:39

The Dark Side should not underestimate our anger.

Comment by Northwest rain | 2008-05-21 15:01:39

That is for damn sure!!!!!!!!

After months of attacking Hillary and thus ALL women — we will not forget nor forgive!

 
 
 
 

Comment by ccwarrior72 | 2008-05-21 13:17:20

Obama is being supplied tons of money by Former electricity minister, Aiham al-Sammara worth 650 million, Saddam and Rezko business party Nadhmi Auchi worth 2.7 billion, and our own George Soros. What are these people planning , some ELITE power structure. Maybe an America payback, one thing for sure it don’t include us…Politicians, superdelegates, friends everyone turning on each other for the money. There selling the country for their own GREED

Comment by Kourian | 2008-05-21 13:59:06

our own George Soros

I was surprised to learn this. Born in Budapest and educated at LSE and Oxford.

Comment by ChrisXP | 2008-05-21 15:44:06

Why? Reds and Pinkos have been in those schools since the 1920s. COMINTEL even recruited there.

 

Comment by terri | 2008-05-21 19:05:28

Why surprised? Everyone knows he’s not an indigenous American and he’s Hungarian. His partner in crime is Arianna Huffington who is also of eastern European extraction. Wasn’t she some kind of Madame in CA when she ran against Ahhhhnold?

 

Comment by Lou | 2008-05-21 19:14:52

The audacity of this is that George Soros formed Move-on.org to aid Former Pres Bill Clinton fight the rove attack machine. He’s another traitor.

 
 

Comment by Tom Plumb | 2008-05-21 15:24:10

Funny, I found a gas bill addressed to an Alsammarae in my mailbox, yesterday.

Really.

Will coincidences never cease….

 

Comment by terri | 2008-05-21 19:07:25

This is why none of us should vote for Obama if he’s the nominee. There is some diabolic plot afoot and Obama is the lynchpin–the puppet. It’s more sinister than Rupert Murdoch’s takeover of the Republican Party.

 
 

Comment by SusanUnPC | 2008-05-21 13:18:09

The fix is in. Four of the truest words ever written.

Oh, here’s another four words: FUCK YOU, Democratic party!

HELL OF A RANT, MediaGirl — and so glad you’re standing up for Larry. We’re all getting attacked. I’m now an infamous racist and the only person worse than me is, horrors, Taylor Marsh.

Fuck ‘em all. KEEP RANTING.

Comment by Kourian | 2008-05-21 14:12:08

Susan!

I’ve just figured out how the Obama campaign works. It’s like the thuggees in Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom. They’ve all drunk the blood of Kali! I found this link at Taylor’s: [CLICK HERE]. Go see what went on there - if you dare.

KALI MAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

 

Comment by Iron Man | 2008-05-21 14:59:38

You kiss your mother with that mouth?

Comment by Tom Plumb | 2008-05-21 15:25:48

You kiss yours with that stupid ass…

 
 

Comment by Nellie | 2008-05-21 22:21:54

Susan

That is awful. So terribly sad that rotten excuse of a person, Obama, has destroyed the minds and sanity of other people.

Surely you realize the Zoids will need extensive de-programming, so you don’t buy their lousy mis-labeling right?

 
 

Comment by Mike Howell | 2008-05-21 13:25:10

BASTA!

It’s too late for a new party this election cycle, so I’ll vote for McCain.

Any other vote is a vote for Oblowme.

We need to plan now for 2012.

Comment by **== President Hillary Clinton **== | 2008-05-21 13:29:22

Why are so many people sure the rules committee is going to commit political suicide on May 31?

There’s plenty we can do to sway them and I refuse to be a pessimist and will fight on.

Hillary has shocked a lot of people including some of her own supporters so why abandon her now at her greatest time of need?

Naysayers are called naysayers for a reason. I ain’t no naysayer.

Lets see Hillary through this all the way to her nomination!

Comment by apishapa | 2008-05-21 13:57:39

Because anything else involves acknowledging that they screwed up big time. Not these assholes. they will put on a little dog and pony show, but whatever they do, it will involve screwing Hillary and the voters.

They certainly will not follow the RULES a