RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Goddess I Love a Fighter

Today Hillary stated what many of us have been secretly wishing for. She said that she would be willing to take the nomination fight right to the convention should Florida and Michigan want to contest the DNC decision.

Clinton may take delegate fight to convention

Hillary Rodham Clinton says she is willing to take her fight to seat Florida and Michigan delegates to the convention if the two states want to go that far. In an interview with The Associated Press, Clinton was asked whether she would support the states if they continue the fight.

The presidential candidate said Wednesday, “Yes I will. I will, because I feel very strongly about this.”

When I read stuff like this I get all choked up. Because Hillary is willing to do what is right regardless of the odds against her. That is something I respect and admire to the core of my being.

But as usual the Obamedia has this all distorted to begin with. They always restate the source of the problem but then they do the unforgivable. They always twist it around to make it seem as if awarding Hillary for her wins would be a slight of some kind toward Obama.

Both states were stripped of their delegates because they voted early, violating national party rules. Clinton won both states; Barack Obama’s name wasn’t on the Michigan ballot.

I think it is about time that we stood up and DEMANDED that the Obamedia report the truth instead of their spin. We need to remind everyone that the reason Obama’s name wasn’t on the ballot in Michigan was because HE TOOK IT OFF THE BALLOT!

And in my book, if you remove yourself from an election you lose the right to contest the results of that election. It’s only common sense.

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post271 Comments »

Comment by gigglechick | 2008-05-21 16:35:34

SWEET! I SO want it to go to the convention!! Fight on, Hillary!!

also… i have Hillary gear that I am donating proceeds to her campaign… the latest is the electoral map with how she’ll beat mccain

http://www.cafepress.com/gigglechick/5112889

Comment by A.Citizen | 2008-05-21 16:43:56

 

Comment by It's Not Me | 2008-05-21 16:51:00

I really like your HTML code t-shirt. Very clever.:)

Comment by gigglechick | 2008-05-21 16:54:03

thanks :} you might just be the first one to “get it” — haven’t sold any of that design. the others have been doing quite well though.

Comment by splashy | 2008-05-22 22:35:08

I’m thinking about buying one of those since I am a website designer. :-D

 
 

Comment by pm317 | 2008-05-21 17:22:43

Is it on that page? I did not see it.

Comment by gigglechick | 2008-05-21 17:25:30

yes i have a bunch on that page.

 

Comment by It's Not Me | 2008-05-21 18:17:25

Comment by gigglechick | 2008-05-21 18:25:17

(thanks! i felt funny posting another link to my designs :}

 
 
 
 

Comment by standard | 2008-05-21 17:10:03

Hillary will not get GORED.
They tried to make Al look like a fool for fighting.
Clinton is spitting in their faces.
She is one ALPHA FEMALE!

Comment by It's Not Me | 2008-05-21 17:19:17

That’s a fact! I think the DNC and the DC elites don’t quite know how to deal with this strong, relentless, WONDERFUL woman! They must be beside themselves trying to figure out what the hell went wrong. LOL! She was suppose to be long gone by now.

Comment by PaganPower | 2008-05-21 18:34:18

I think you are absolutely right. They thought they knew her. They thought they could take her out. And they were wrong from the start.

Hillary is my champion. She fights like no other politician I have seen in my lifetime including her husband whom I admire and appreciate greatly.

Comment by Tom Plumb | 2008-05-21 18:35:18

They are absolutely befuddled.

I think they were set up from the start, too stupid to figure it out.

Still too stupid to figure it out.

 

Comment by fran | 2008-05-21 20:07:33

Even Carl Bernstein said, “Obama has got a real problem. Hillary has a very strong movement.”

Who’s got the movement now???

 
 
 
 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-21 17:18:42

NPR : ALL THINGS CONSIDERED…..just did a story on the groundswell of Clinton supporters…..msm is startin to pick it up…..Yeah ! All The Way To Denver !

 
 

Comment by Hillraiser429 | 2008-05-21 16:37:00

Amen. Both Edwards and Obama’s people told voters via their websites and by going door-to-door that a vote for “uncommitted” was a vote for them. THAT IS CAMPAIGNING! They broke the rules and STILL claim the moral high ground.

Comment by PamFlorida | 2008-05-21 17:18:45

Did BO change his name to “Uncommited”? That would be the only basis for his claiming rights to those votes. Reminds me of a child saying “That’s not fair, I wasn’t ready.”
Most states don’t have ‘uncommited’ on the ballot. What is the purpose of voting uncommited? How has MI. assigned those votes in the past?
Is that like BO voting “present” in the Il. senate? Sort of like, “I’m here but I’m not going to tell you what I think”?
Food for thought.

Comment by fran | 2008-05-21 20:10:02

The MSM is also not honestly reporting the truth about WHY he took his name off the ballot: it was a political maneuver to make Clinton look bad to Iowa and NH voters. Can we ever look forward to the day when they will actually tell the truth about this opportunist?

 

Comment by fran | 2008-05-21 20:14:21

Isn’t she fabulous?! It’s been such a pleasure to watch Hillary become such a radiant leader through this process. Meanwhile, Obama, 14 years her junior, is exhausted, making mistakes, and “bored.”

 

Comment by SueB. | 2008-05-22 01:39:10

Have you read the DNC Delegate Selection Rules? I have. 12.A.
“All candidates for delegate and alternate in caususes, committees, conventions, and on primary ballots shall be identified as to presidential preference or uncommitted status at all levels of a process that determines presidential process.”
Heck, I thought about running as an uncommitted delegate once.

Before you go spouting off it might do you some good to actually research what the hell you’re talking about. Ya think?

 
 

Comment by PaganPower | 2008-05-21 18:36:27

Obama broke the rules in Florida too. As far as I am concerned Obama doesn’t deserve a single delegate from either state. Not one!

Comment by mary C. | 2008-05-21 22:58:38

He sure did! I live in Jacksonville and he had ads running on the cable channels for a week before the vote.

 
 

Comment by cc | 2008-05-21 18:51:24

let’s NOT forget that Obama’s the one who blocked a revote in Michigan! He had his chance for Michigan to vote again and he NIXED it. That’s HIS problem.

 
 

Comment by my friends | 2008-05-21 16:42:44

This is awesome! The Democrat Party is going down in flames this year! YOU GO HILLARY!

Comment by Nathan | 2008-05-21 16:57:17

Blame Obama, not Clinton. It’s because of her that we have any chance to salvage it.

Comment by Tom Plumb | 2008-05-21 18:12:15

eh, I see using K** to clean the sink out.

WTH wants losers like those behind Obama?

 
 
 

Comment by terri | 2008-05-21 16:45:29

OT but I see Jimmy Carter is now talking openly about OBAMA’S VP choice. He’s advocating Sam Nunn–from Georgia! Guess that’s what the DNC used to win Carter over. He also said he doesn’t think a Clinton/Obama ticket would be the best thing for the Democrats! These people have all lost their minds. Obama/Nunn? Who’s going to vote for that?

Not buying anymore Jimmy Carter books or tapes.

Comment by It's Not Me | 2008-05-21 16:53:05

Sam Nunn for VP??? Jimmeh has lost his freakin’ mind. He needs to go hammer some more nails and STFU.

Comment by Isolde | 2008-05-21 17:11:00

Sam Nunn for Cheney of the United States.

 

Comment by Clara Barton | 2008-05-21 18:48:22

Let him take Sam Nunn. He’d lose anyway, and why do we want to throw away a perfectly good Democrat, one with a future, on a lousy top of the ticket? There are a couple I really, really don’t want to see wasted on him.

 
 

Comment by Jeremiah "God Damn AmeriKKKA" Wright | 2008-05-21 17:30:28

I am sure in some twisted way they are thinking the COmbination of their annointed Messiah with a Nunn on the ticket would reassure catholics and christians everywhere that this is the devine ticket.

Clearly its subliminal pandering to those bitter people who cling to religion.

Comment by beebop | 2008-05-21 19:10:56

I like the way you think …. ;)

 

Comment by Susie | 2008-05-21 19:27:16

Catholics have been voting Hillary.

 
 

Comment by ChrisXP | 2008-05-21 17:47:46

Sam Nunn is a good VP candidate. But, the problem is Sam Nunn is like Zell Miller — a conservative Democrat.

It’s like asking Joe Lieberman to be his VP.

http://www.bookrags.com/biography/sam-nunn/

His 1981 ratings from Americans for Constitutional Action (conservative) was 71, while Americans for Democratic Action (liberal) gave him a 35. These figures do not explain Nunn’s Democratic Party values nearly as much as does his membership in the D.L.C. (Democratic Leadership Council). He founded this organization in 1985 with other moderates such as Charles Robb, Joseph Biden, and Lawton Chiles to restore the South and West, as Nunn put it, to “… the mainstream of American politics”; other goals were a strong national defense, commitment to arms control within reason, and retention of civil rights gains. Among other D.L.C. members, Nunn was perhaps more conservative, as evidenced by his early support for the Strategic Defense Initiative (known popularly as “Star Wars”) and aid to anti-Communist “Contra” forces in Nicaragua.

That would cause the Neo-Libs to riot! Marky must be getting nightmares, too!!

Comment by PaganPower | 2008-05-21 18:38:38

Agreed. Nunn is way conservative, especially for a Democrat.

 
 

Comment by cc | 2008-05-21 19:01:33

it’s really too bad for Jimmy, but obviously senility has set in. He’s just as sexist as anyone I’ve ever seen and as we can see he’s sooooo living in the past.

 
 

Comment by Joe Beese | 2008-05-21 16:46:40

Oh, she’s going. I think we can count on that.

But she would go even if she gets FL and MI seated as-is. [heh heh - not very likely] She would simply change her rationale - yet again - to “the delegates can switch at any time”. As indeed they can.

She still won’t get the nomination, of course. And she’ll forfeit all those millions of dollars she loaned her campaign - since federal election law says such loans can’t be paid back after the vote. That will be a nice consolation prize for having to put up with her for a few more weeks.

See you at Obama’s inauguration.

Comment by Scarlet Oh Hairy | 2008-05-21 16:54:18

Not so fast Joe Beese. Obama needs our votes out here to get into that inauguration ball. Without us, he’s toast. Remember that! And we are pledged here on this site to forgo voting for Obama. We are also determined to support a schism in the Democratic Party. Then what will Democrats do without millions of voters who are fed up with having an inexperienced, naive, unelectable young man shoved down our throats?

Comment by Joe Beese | 2008-05-21 16:59:12

Well, I know that’s the position here. Who knows? Maybe you’re right.

But perhaps you’ve noticed the lingering resentment against Jimmy Carter - more than a quarter of a century after the fact - for what is perceived to be the damage he did to the party?

That’s putting his face on Mt. Rushmore compared to what Hillary’s legacy is going to be if we lose this election. Whether you think it fair or not, she’s going to perceived as having pointlessly kneecapped our strongest candidate in decades out of her narcissistic sense of entitlement.

Comment by Tom Plumb | 2008-05-21 17:05:52

Indian call center slow today?

I don’t even read your crap anymore, that is how insignificant you are.

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-21 17:27:02

Yeah the english is better than the usual GAZA trolls….lol

 

Comment by **== President & Commander-in-Chief Hillary Clinton **== | 2008-05-21 17:52:59

I don’t read his poop either.

 
 

Comment by BJinChicago | 2008-05-21 17:10:07

It is Obama and his followers who have split the party. It is the DNC leadership that has split the party. Trust me, people will be writing about this election for years to come. No matter how the media tries to spin it; our words, our journals, our diaries will be lurking in cyberspace to set the record straight.

Comment by cc | 2008-05-21 19:03:42

funny screen name - gee wonder what that’s in reference to….

 
 

Comment by LandOLincoln | 2008-05-21 17:23:40

Oh, do stop whining, you silly little person. Hillary Clinton is doing what she can to save what’s left of the Democratic party from power hungry, cynical $ellouts like Howard Dean, John Kerry, and–sadly–Teddy Kennedy and Jimmy Carter.

You know–the old farts who think they have to destroy the party to save it (for themselves)?

Well, it’s not working. We’re taking it back–and you lot can go back to yer video games and yer circle jerks.

See you in Denver, wimpy.

 

Comment by Jeremiah "God Damn AmeriKKKA" Wright | 2008-05-21 17:33:39

If Obama is our strongest candidate in years, the democratic party should disband and the democratic leadership should engage in mass ritual hari kari.

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-05-21 20:40:00

Hara kiri, and the actual term is seppeku.

Harry Caray is a dead, drunken sportscaster who landed in Chicago after an unfortunate incident in St. Louis.

Comment by Taters | 2008-05-21 22:01:14

 

Comment by SueB. | 2008-05-22 01:43:49

That was Harry Caray Jr.

 
 
 

Comment by Scarlet Oh Hairy | 2008-05-21 17:43:39

Joe Beese,

If the Democrats should lose the general election in November, it could be said that their complete refusal to thoroughly vet their candidate was the number one reason for their embarrassing loss.

If damaging material emerges in the next few weeks or months with regard to Michelle Obama, or even perhaps regarding Obama himself, the general public will question the leadership of the Democratic Party.

To say that Hillary’s legacy would be gravely tarnished by Obama’s demise is ridiculous and demonstrates your dismal understanding regarding how women feel about her. Obviously you have absolutely no connection to how deeply admired Hillary Clinton is to her supporters. That is why she now has within her possession a movement of her own. She has exhibited great strength of character. If you hadn’t noticed, she is now a role model for millions of women who will now aspire to even greater heights.

When we women, once again, rewrite the HERSTORY books, Hillary Clinton will go down as one of the greatest of American women. She will share the stage with Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Sojourner Truth, Lucretia Mott and Eleanor Roosevelt.

She is a maverick! Don’t step on her because if you do, you step on all of us who love and cherish her greatness!

Comment by cc | 2008-05-21 19:08:02

Scarlet, it’s not just dem women that admire Hillary. On fox I’ve seen numerous female conservative anchors and contributors comment on how they used to be against HRC, but seeing her stand tall this election despite the being punched in the gut over and over again has changed their opinion of her. alot of them now say they are truly impressed with Hillary’s perseverance, strength and determination to keep fighting. I personally think Hillary is an absolutely AWESOME role model for millions of women worldwide.

Comment by Hope | 2008-05-21 21:55:52

cc
Absolutely!:)

 
 
 

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-05-21 17:48:01

What does that matter? Obama trashed her character and her husband’s legacy already.

She’s got absolutely nothing to lose. That’s why he should reach a compromise quickly on this unless he’d like this to turn into a worse mess.

He has the power. He can compromise.

Comment by Scarlet Oh Hairy | 2008-05-21 18:07:02

He can trash her all he wants, but he cannot control the outcome. No one controls everything and no one has all of the power.

He has the power? He thinks he has it. All we have to do is organize and cut him off at the throat.

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-05-21 18:21:14

He has the power to compromise. He has his argument in front of the committee, which he could withdraw.

Sorry I wasn’t clear.

 
 

Comment by stodghie | 2008-05-22 01:08:00

in fact obama has the illusion of power and what little influence he has is short lived. obama is on the end of order giving by the power brokers.

 
 

Comment by Stop Obama/Marx 08 | 2008-05-21 18:22:21

The selfish Obama kneecapped the last successful two termed democratic president.
Obama is also to blame for the attempted ousting of the democrat FDR wing of the party.
By injecting race the Obama people have set back relations 30 years.
Hillary was By far the strongest candidate but poor little Obama had to have his election despite having no experience.
Obama and his minions in the MSM and DNC plus the 57 states of Islam are going to loose.
The people of the United States are rising up against this hostile takeover!

Hillary will win in November!!!

Comment by cc | 2008-05-21 19:09:28

I pray you are right! Obama and his cronies are a bunch of scrary, creepy dudes.

 
 

Comment by Lyn | 2008-05-21 18:31:29

Don’t blame Hillary and her supporters, Blame the fools in the DNC that would choose a candidate with ties to terrorists, Rezko, Auchi, Odingo and sat in a racist Anti American church for 20 years and expect to win. Hillary is the one that can keep the Dems from going down in flames, but if Obam is the Nom then many people will pick McCain because he is the better choice.

 

Comment by PaganPower | 2008-05-21 18:43:17

You are so totally wrong to blame this debacle of a nomination process on Hillary. Hillary obeyed the rules. Obama didn’t. Hillary tried to find some way for Michigan and Florida to revote. Obama stood in the way. Obama started the race baiting. Hillary didn’t.

In my not so humble opinion Hillary is the only reason to vote democratic this fall. She is the only candidate I will support. And I am quite certain that there are lots of people just like me.

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-05-21 18:45:58

I second that and I’m ready to march (I too am disabled)

I will find a way. For Hillary!
For counting ALL VOTES!!!

Primary OR General
Same / Same

form/machine/voting station/state certificationnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

deedeedee!

 
 

Comment by Clara Barton | 2008-05-21 18:50:39

Strongest candidate in decades? Gack. You’re really besotted, aren’t you?

Comment by stodghie | 2008-05-22 01:09:12

clara take a hike. there is a nice cliff nearby. practice your dives dearie.

 
 
 
 

Comment by It's Not Me | 2008-05-21 16:57:04

You are so delusional. BO isn’t going to be the nominee. He can’t win the GE. Have you seen the electoral maps? The DC elites may be the most ignorant people on earth, but they don’t like losing elections. Hillary WILL BE the nominee. DEAL WITH IT.

See you at Hillary’s inauguration.

Comment by not likely | 2008-05-21 19:45:54

Even if Hillary is the nominee, just like BO she will alienate a significant portion of the electorate making a ge victory problmatic at best. She will lose the AA vote as well as the under 30 vote even though the MSM doesn’t give them the same air time they do the white vote. Moreover, not only will she lose the under 30 vote many younger voters are unwilling to accept another Bush or Clinton even if it means riots or worse. I think what you meant to say was see you at McCain’s inauguration.

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-05-21 22:11:56

The AA vote is primarily in red southern states. Those states were never in play anyway. Then if Obama isn’t on the ticket its a good chance that Hillary would receive 90% of their vote just like all democrats before her.

There are many more shoes to drop on Obama and when most of the truth is out, Obama’s stock will drop accordingly. His political career will go in flames just like the Hindenburg.

 

Comment by Hope | 2008-05-21 22:27:37

She does not have those voters now and is winning the electoral college against McCain, gaining any % at from the fringe of the party will only boost her numbers.

Comment by stodghie | 2008-05-22 01:10:46

you actually sound like your koolaid was spiked. don’t you know the rules don’t blog after one glass of koolaid.

 
 
 
 

Comment by Ellen D. | 2008-05-21 16:57:12

Are you one of the Obama sweet talkers that wants my support?

 

Comment by stodghie | 2008-05-21 16:59:27

it will be you, michelle and him with one of those crowns made out of cardboard box.

 

Comment by cc | 2008-05-21 19:02:21

in your dreams

Comment by stodghie | 2008-05-22 01:11:50

actually obami and the rest of his crew like you are nightmares to the american people. shame on you!

 
 
 

Comment by Jerad | 2008-05-21 16:47:19

All that can be said about this situation is straight from Hillary herself:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OsYnegoV28

 

Comment by katmandu | 2008-05-21 16:47:34

Presidents are fighters; presidents do what is right; Hillary should be President.

Comment by PaganPower | 2008-05-21 18:44:27

 
 

Comment by JP | 2008-05-21 16:48:18

I just heard that one of Obama’s campaign guys is going to take over at the DNC. A guy named Tewes. Is there any way we can stop that?

Comment by **== President & Commander-in-Chief Hillary Clinton **== | 2008-05-21 17:55:23

Just heard? Provide a link if you want people to take this seriously.

Comment by PaganPower | 2008-05-21 18:48:55

Comment by cc | 2008-05-21 19:12:25

well…..I for sure won’t mind leaving the party in June if this is true. good riddance dnc…you continue to suck.

 
 

Comment by Susie | 2008-05-21 19:42:20

I read it too. Don’t remember where.

 
 
 

Comment by troll free zone | 2008-05-21 16:48:26

Darlin’ simply put,
the odds aren’t against her. only the hype.

 

Comment by ginaswo | 2008-05-21 16:55:32

RIGHT ON!!!!
ALL THE WAY TO DENVER AND THE WHITE HOUSE BABY!!

BOOYAH!!!

HILLYEAH!!!

 

Comment by my friends | 2008-05-21 16:57:38

the odds aren’t against her. only the hype.

So true. She can make up that delegate deficit by turning to the people! We can shut this convention down! If Hillary can’t be nominated, then neither can Obama! Just say the word, Hillary, and we march!

 

Comment by calli sweeti | 2008-05-21 17:01:35

Hillary makes me proud to be an American woman. CNN is using a speech writer for JFK to compare Obama to JFK. CNN makes me gag with their propaganda shows. I hope Wolfie is embarrassed for himself. Obama is no JFK!

Comment by BJinChicago | 2008-05-21 17:16:09

Calli,

Please stop watching them; you are increasing their ratings and doing bad things to your health and well-being. Do what, HRC said, shut them out. They are insignificant. When we watch them, they get a paycheck. When we stop and ratings go down, they get the boot.

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-05-21 17:29:46

I agree. I find that blogging on hillary sites, checking the news, and watching Monk reruns keeps the blood pressure steady. :)

Comment by beebop | 2008-05-21 19:24:36

The only thing I check them for at all is stock quotes … anyone have any ideas how to avoid that?

Comment by SueB. | 2008-05-22 01:50:43

CNBC on mute.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by JMS825 | 2008-05-21 17:04:00

Obama keeps using the “I was not on the ballot in MI” but correct me if I am wrong in the general election if Nadar or Bell cant get their name on a ballot in a state we dont give them trophy votes do we?

Comment by Hope | 2008-05-21 22:33:10

That is Obama’s strong suit, any hint of trouble..run the other way and create a distraction.
I wasn’t in church that day
I wasn’t on the ballot
I didn’t have time to visit Kentucky
But look over here:
John Edwards likes me
75,000 people came to see me..NOT
I crown myself the winner in Iowa
what a joke!

 
 

Comment by Diane | 2008-05-21 17:05:23

I just read an AP article stating:

“Obama plans to contest the final three primaries in Puerto Rico, South Dakota and Montana, but he is already moving on, well into the early stages of a general election plan that will take him to other critical swing states in the coming weeks.”

Can he “contest” the remaining primaries?

Comment by Tom Plumb | 2008-05-21 17:08:11

Boy, that campaign is loonytoons.

A lot of internal problems with Obama’s people, huh?

Couldn’t happen to a better bunch of guys.

 

Comment by calling all toasters | 2008-05-21 17:21:21

“Contest” means compete in, enter the contest.

Comment by Diane | 2008-05-21 17:23:22

Oh. I thought they meant he was going to dispute or challenge the remaining primaries. I wouldn’t put it past him to try. Thanks.

 
 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-21 17:21:45

WTF….is Obama trying to block those primaries….HUH ?

 

Comment by PamFlorida | 2008-05-21 17:35:28

Maybe he meant he’ll still campaign in those primaries.
However, I recently heard a BO surrogate, maybe Plouff, say that Puerto Rico doesn’t count because it’s not a state!
It’s spin, controlling the narrative to depress voter turnout. If people think it’s over, they will stay home-except for the hardcore Obama devotees.

Comment by Clara Barton | 2008-05-21 18:56:40

Puerto Ricans won’t stay home. They love to vote! If there’s an election, they come out to vote.

 

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-05-21 22:20:55

Well neither is Guam, but Obama and his people were all over that. Including soiled ballots. They were loving all 4 delegates, now that spit at 63 - perhaps another tsunami is headed his way.

 
 

Comment by stodghie | 2008-05-22 01:13:34

that means he isn’t showing up and then whining when he doesn’t win. you gotta learn to understand “what obami meant.”

 
 

Comment by ChrisXP | 2008-05-21 17:10:32

Today Hillary stated what many of us have been secretly wishing for. She said that she would be willing to take the nomination fight right to the convention should Florida and Michigan want to contest the DNC decision.

Word up!

Let’s get a Million Women march ready as well. First time in a generation, since the ERA push, that a HUGE rally of women protested about equality and justice!

Let’s educate not hate!

Comment by It's Not Me | 2008-05-21 17:25:29

A Million woman march is a FANTASTIC idea! I would go!

Comment by Diane | 2008-05-21 17:28:58

I’d go too. I’ve got breast cancer and if I’m going down, I wanna go out with a bang and leave one last shining example for my teenage daughter!!!