Michelle Obama Off Tape
By Bud White on June 13, 2008 at 10:30 AM in Barack Obama, Clinton, Current Affairs, Hillary Clinton, Jewish voters, Larry Johnson, Michelle Obama, Minister Louis Farrakhan, Obama, Stokely Carmichael, White People, Whitey Tape, hate speech
by Bud White and Medusa
I will “use all of my present and future resources to benefit [the Black]community first and foremost
Regardless of the circumstances underwhich I interact with whites…it often seems as if, to them, I will always be black first
there is a distinctive Black culture different from White culture.
[A] Black person may have all White friends and prefer these friends and their activities to those with Blacks without the individual believing that he/she is White
Are these the long-awaited excerpts from Michelle Obama’s “whitey” rant? No, these gems of racial “tolerance” come from her Princeton thesis. As the Obama campaign unleashes its Orcs to stifle dissent and cover-up Michelle’s greatest hits, we believe an analysis of Michelle Obama’s public statements and writings offer plenty of material to understand her views on race, with or without the audio tape.
Like archaeologists uncovering artifacts to decipher a culture, we view Michelle’s extant words as a crystallization of a worldview which can be examined to understand her views on race in America. Michelle Obama wrote the quotes above in her Princeton thesis on race and in it acknowledges that that she is influenced by and utilizes the definition of black “separationism” offered by Stokely Carmichael and Charles Hamilton in their 1967 screed Black Power: The Politics of Liberation in America. She writes:
Stokely Carmichael guided Michelle Obama’s thesis on race? This is very important. Carmichael was not a mainstream academic source in his times. He was not the Henry Louis Gates, Jr. of the 1960s, writing scholarly, brilliant works on black America. In fact, Carmichael, the Honorary Prime Minister of the Black Panther Party, espoused a violent black separatist philosophy which was diametrically opposed to Dr. King’s and the Civil Rights Movement’s struggle for integration and equality.
In his 1966 article entitled What We Want, in the New York Review of Books, Stokely Carmichael wrote, “about plots to ‘get Whitey‘” saying that “Black people don’t want to ‘get whitey,’” and in a 1969 article entitled Toward Black Liberation, Carmichael talks about racial incidents as “Git Whitey” “sensationalism.” Christopher Hitchens writes:
I remember poor Stokely Carmichael quite well. After a hideous series of political and personal fiascos, he fled to Africa, renamed himself Kwame Toure after two of West Africa’s most repellently failed dictators, and then came briefly back to the United States before electing to die in exile. I last saw him as the warm-up speaker for Louis Farrakhan in Madison Square Garden in 1985, on the evening when Farrakhan made himself famous by warning Jews, “You can’t say ‘Never Again’ to God, because when he puts you in the ovens, you’re there forever.”
Consider for a moment that Michelle Obama built her thesis on the philosophy of a man who believed that “Before a group can enter the open society, it must first close ranks.”
Next consider her statement that she will “use all of my present and future resources to benefit [the Black] community first and foremost.” [Emphasis added]
Lastly, remember that the Obamas spent 20 years as active students of Jeremiah Wright’s odious racist rants. Think about that in mathematical terms. If they attended church for two hours weekly, that’s 2,000 hours of Jeremiah Wright, or one full year of working at a job 40 hours a week. That’s a lot of “United States of KKK-A.” The Obamas were, until recently, members of a church which describes itself in explicitly racial language:
We are a congregation which is Unashamedly Black and Unapologetically Christian… Our roots in the Black religious experience and tradition are deep, lasting and permanent. We are an African people, and remain “true to our native land,” the mother continent, the cradle of civilization. [emphasis added]
In other words, the Obamas were active participants in a black separatist church, a church which explicitly emphasized skin color over salvation, heritage over faith, one group of people instead of the universality of spiritual needs.The ideology espoused from this church may sound innocuous to Obama’s supporters. But it’s an important question, in a diverse nation of 300 million. Do we want a couple in the White House whose stated influences include Stokely Carmichael and Jeremiah Wright instead of Martin Luther King? Or someone who said:
For the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country
Really, Michelle? Is it because Barack is so wonderful that only now you’re proud of your country or is there another reason you’re proud for the first time? Please tell us the reason. Or as Christopher Hitchens asks about Obama:
If there is a reason why the potential nominee has been keeping what he himself now admits to be very bad company—and if the rest of his character seems to make this improbable—then either he is hiding something and/or it is legitimate to ask him about his partner.
This is why I will consider the rumor of the infamous tape as a smear until it is released. There is plenty of info on Michelle Obama and her beliefs already. So to followers of Obama, I concede. The so-called ‘whitey’ tape is a smear and will do harm to Hillary and McCain if it turns out not to be true. But if it is true and is released well, then let’s talk.
Why in the world would it harm Hillary or McCain?
If/when this tape is released it will cause great harm to ob’s run for the highest office in the land.
Rightfully so. Not only does it mesh with what MO has said all along but Ob’s denial of it existing will cause his already enormous credibility problem to become the fairy dust it actually should be.
If this tape turns out to be nothing more than smear it will only hurt those who started the rumor if we ever even find out who they are.
Hillary or Mac aren’t responsible for what their supporters say.
Larry would gain credibility if it is true and would lose some crediblity for passing on things from sources he deemed reliable.
Like I’ve said a dozen times, to me the tape isn’t going to sway me one way or the other. The truth or lie of the tape is not important for me.
You are right but as you probably know already supporters of Obama are trying to tie this to McCain and Hillary. I do believe Larry is speaking the truth about the folks he trusts who are informing him of the tape’s existence.
they always try to blame everything on someone else, IT IS WHAT THEY DO. No accoutability. Why all the defenses out there saying “no, she didn’t say whitey she said ‘why’d he’”. Pathetic. Who says they even deserve the benefit of the doubt anyway, isn’t this “presidential” politics, anything goes, get out of the kitchen…if they cannot handle it simply step out of the way and let the real adults run the show.
funny how I hear this from everybody. “All does is blame everything on someone else. never accepts the blame for their mistakes”.
Nice discourse on this site. Let’s talk about rumours while there are many other worth while debates to have.
then go to another site, wtf to you.
By MCCAIN February 25th, 2008
” Michelle Obama does not look into a crowd and see Americans. She sees black people and white people eternally conflicted with one another.
That is a very divisive view for a potential first lady that would do untold damage to race relations in this country in a Barack Obama administration. Michelle Obama’s intellectually refined racism should give all Americans pause for deep concern. “
I have no idea what Larry Sinclair may or may not produce at his press conference next week, BUT what I find interesting is that the venue has been expanded by 4 times it’s original size!
Apparently there is greatly increased interest from foreign media outlets and this is one of the reasons for the venue being expanded to 4 times it’s original size.
There are UNCONFIRMED rumors that Rev. Wright and Manning will be speaking also, that could be interesting to be sure. The gift that keeps on giving taking another kick at the can, oh please let that be true, lol.
http://www.press.org/calendar/calendarday.cfm?whatday=18&&whatyear=2008&&whatmonth=6
http://press.org/facilities/meetingrooms.cfm
Original room booked: Lisagor Room 608 sq ft accommodates 50
New room Booked:Holeman Lounge 1,833 sq ft accommodates 200
Excellent. Thanks for the heads up, I’ve been keeping an eye on that event myself.
Should make for interesting reading…
the significance of the name of the new lounge is not lost on me…
Hole-Man lounge
Cause when she see a crowd of White People cheering on her Husband…. she’s smiling wide —> Cause she got you all—Bamboozled !…BAM … she feels justified….She got your money, she got your support and she’s thinking she got the whitest thing of all— The White House…..
All you are going to see of Michelle Obama is her SMILING…..She got you ( white people ) BACK—> Got your money, got your Support, and a future bright with even more Money—> Thank you ObamBiBots…..for your Blind Support and Mostly————–> YOUR MONEY !
So if I don’t think just like you I’m not welcome here? That must make for some good debate.
Then pick a topic and debate it.
Lots of whining out you….but no debates that I’ve seen.
Ya, hypocrite.
So grtphoto you just want to talk about rumors?? Well I heard Hillary is a lesbian. Want to talk about that?
My father never voted for a dem because he worked hard. I never voted for a dem, because I went to college, worked hard, saved and invested. The dems want to take from people who followed the rules in order to achieve the American dream and give it to lazy, irresponsible people. My wife doesn’t work. She hasn’t since we married. She doesn’t need welfare, equal pay, abortion rights or any of that socialist crap. She is well taken care of by me–her husband. Republican women are far more free than dem women. Your women are all married to Uncle Sam. They have to FIGHT for everything. When women relearn their proper place, they will be much better off.
My friends at Free Republic have posted their thanks to Hillary supporters. Keep up the good work. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1992769/posts
VOTE MCCAIN! KEEP TRADITIONAL VALUES STRONG!
Hillary supporters, especially women, have expected the backlash if Obama looses the GE. They will blame someone, and it will be women., black, brown, and white. I am not a proponent of voting for McCain, but I will not waiver in supporting Hillary.
It is really hard to be a “good loser” when someone gets 18 million votes. Such a “loss” actually makes one feel like a “winner”.
It is not Hillary’s job to get her faithful to “endorse” Obama. It is his job, and it appears that he does not intend to put this on his action item agenda. Putting her in such a position is sexist within itself.
The backlash will come. We are just seeing the preface of the history books coming our way. Best to fight backlash with foreshadowing.
I wouldn’t regard it as backlash. I would regard it as “taking the credit”. And if they want to treat us worse, well there’s always another election.
Yes, I agree. We can “take the credit” for getting her in office, before the backlash ensues.
Yes, we shouldn’t waiver in support of Hillary. It doesn’t matter that she lost the nomination, let’s keep supporting her instead of uniting the party as she is asking us to do. Lets keep being petty sore losers and help McCain win the general.
I mean she did win the popular vote (well if you don’t count states that count and count states that she said shouldn’t count). It doesn’t matter that the Democratic Primary isn’t determined by popular vote but by delegate count. Let’s keep trying to change the rules. I mean after all isn’t that Obama’s slogan, “Change”? Isn’t he implying by that that we should try to change the rules every chance we get. After all we couldn’t win by
Let’s do all we can to help Obama lose so the backlash will come and then we can say “I told you so”. So what if our country will be even worse off than it is today, at least we get to say “I told you so”.
As far as I’m concerned, What-the-F**k, Hillary won the nomination with the popular vote, and the electoral college vote–she would have had the delegates, and the superdelegates if the primary had been done in a fair way (not disenfranchising FL & MI while ignoring the other states that broke the rules…and allowing for the ridiculous–utterly stupid–caucauses in states that will vote for McCain).
It’s so easy to despise and loathe Obama’s campaign, his supporters, and the DNC for making this primary a travesty. Obama deserves to lose, and lose big-time for that reason alone, but also because he’s completely unprepared and unsuited for the WH, and because neither he nor his wife can truly represent all Americans.
I saw this on a protester’s sign about GB but I think it will work for you. It said “Like a rock but Dumber”. This seems to describe your knowledge of the election process in America. Before you make a statement google your sources better. The Electoral College is for the Nov. election not the selection of a person. All you closet racists need to get over it. Your person lost and ours won. The only travesty is how bitter HRC supporters are about the lost. Never cut off your nose to spite your face is a good saying for what all you want to do in Nov. Look at this election for what it can do for our country. We have a chance to get us back on the right track again. Please don’t throw it all away because your candidate lost. You must have been hell as a child and lost playing a game to a smarter opponet.
Well, not-so-Skilledcraft, ignore the electoral college votes at your own peril.
It’s typical of Obamabrats like you to resort to insults. I care not for what you think.
You’re backing the wrong horse.
Comment by Skilcraft59 | 2008-06-14 08:36:25
All you closet racists need to get over it. in one breath then comes out with this funny
Please don’t throw it all away because your candidate lost. You must have been hell as a child and lost playing a game to a smarter opponet.
and wonder why we will not vote for your person!
My father never voted for a dem because he worked hard. I never voted for a dem, because I went to college, worked hard, saved and invested. The dems want to take from people who followed the rules in order to achieve the American dream and give it to lazy, irresponsible people. My wife doesn’t work. She hasn’t since we married. She doesn’t need welfare, equal pay, abortion rights or any of that socialist crap. She is well taken care of by me–her husband. Republican women are far more free than demoncrat “women”. Your women are married to Uncle Sam. They have to FIGHT for everything. When women relearn their proper place, they will be much better off.
My friends at Free Republic have posted their thanks to Hillary supporters. Keep up the good work. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1992769/posts
VOTE MCCAIN! KEEP TRADITIONAL VALUES STRONG!
What in Gods name are you talking about? First off why are you connecting Clinton and McCains name as if they are allied? And second the entirety of the democratic party is looking to gooper operatives as the source of this smear. I have not seen one word anywhere from a person suspicious of Clinton involvement.
As to the truth and Larry. If there was a tape, a DVD, a charcoal sketch of this I think a desperate GOP would be blaring it on every outlet in the country.
I am deeply disappointed in Larry. I once enjoyed reading his posts at the TPM cafe. Now I am concerned for his mental health.
I heard they’ve been playing it at fundraisers which would make sense. The sensationalism of it alone would fetch a hefty price of admission for a screening. The Republicans must be loving this.
“why are you connecting Clinton and McCains name as if they are allied?”
Perhaps because the Hillary supporters are doing a great job of smearing Obama. (Yes smearing, not vetting.) The republicans really don’t have to do that much, they’re just sitting back and letting the sore loser Hillary supporters do all their work for them.
So…..does this mean that Obama supporters will stop smearing McCain’s first wife?
And don’t forget, Obama’s supporters continues to maliciously smear Hillary and Bill.
yup, that whole Hillary wants BOBO murdered smear was the smear of all smears, the lie of all lies.
The most heinous insult for me and one, among many, that drives my vengeance is the relentless attempt to label Bill and Hillary Clinton as racists.
Such will go down in history as one of the most vile political assasinations ever!
Such was a lie then, and it is now. Actually the polar opposite of who the Clintons are and always have been.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1992769/posts You are welcome here–Hillary supporters. We respect what you are doing.
I was worried there for a while about my taxes going up. But, Hillary and her supporters are working overtime to help McCain.
The Grand Old Party, the Party of Lincoln, Coolidge and Reagan doesn’t have to stoop to using a wanted felon to smear Obama. I suspect this is a vast LEFT WING conspiracy. Thanks. Dems have a long history of racism. I don’t understand how blacks can vote for dems after all the evil they have done . http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1992769/posts
My father never voted for a dem because he worked hard. I never voted for a dem, because I went to college, worked hard, saved and invested. The dems want to take from people who followed the rules in order to achieve the American dream and give it to lazy, irresponsible people. My wife doesn’t work. She hasn’t since we married. She doesn’t need welfare, equal pay, abortion rights or any of that socialist crap. She is well taken care of by me–her husband. Republican women are far more free than demoncrat “women”. Your women are married to Uncle Sam. They have to FIGHT for everything. When women relearn their proper place, they will be much better off.
My friends at Free Republic have posted their thanks to Hillary supporters. Keep up the good work
VOTE MCCAIN! KEEP TRADITIONAL VALUES STRONG!
If she said that stuff, they can attach it to anybody they want. Killing the messenger isn’t going to erase the words.
Besides, Barack Obama is running out of people to blame for everything.
Karen if it walks like a duck and talks like a duck — its a duck. This is the way Michelle Obama feels about the majority of this country and these are the people we Americans could give all this power to.
There is a tape out there because this is the way Michelle Obama speaks. To put this in you college thesis means you don’t care where you voice your bigotry. Check out Obama’s book Dreams of My Father. Its full of racist rants. This couple is perfect for each other but not for the USA.
That’s right, we don’t want any racist person as president. Well unless it Hillary or McCain.
WTF, F**k O**.
see, you’re still smearing Hillary while you whine and whine and whine like a good little BOBO boy.
Wtf — It’s offensive to troll around here with that name. I suggest you that using a decent name so that we can elevate the discourse here.
How does “Barry” sound?
As I recall, the black panthers used to say that the only position for a woman in their movement was horizontal.
This would explain the rampant misogynistic behavior of the Obama campaign.
Republicans for McCain welcome Hillary supporters. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1992769/posts You are welcome here–Hillary supporters. We respect what you are doing.
I was worried there for a while about my taxes going up. But, Hillary and her supporters are working overtime to help McCain.
So then why is Obama responsible for what his supporters say? You all are always saying those Obama supporters are why you cannot support the candidate. Or blasting Obama for something stupid a surrogate says.He is no more responsible than Hillary or jackass McSame. he cannot control what comes out of anyone’s mouth but his own.
Good lord. You guys are good at projecting. Hillary and YOU ALL blame the media for her loss, not her horrible campaign. Hillary blamed MEN for her loss, not her horrible husband who dug a hole for her. That is not playing the victim? hahaha
Excuse me while I go laugh at your palpable envy.
Quiz: What do George McGovern, Mike Dukakis and Barack Obama have in common?
Answer: Their zealot followers pissed off the electorate.
This has nothing to do with why you all hold Obama responsible for what his supporers say but not Hillary or McCain.
Way to deflect though.
Back to sipping your kool-aid. It may be a different brand, but it’s kool-aid nonetheless.
Query: What do Hillary and McCain have in common?
Answer: Just about everything.
What do Barack Obama and Osama Bin Laden have in common? They both have friends that BOMBED THE PENTAGON
jim aaron….right on the money!
Someone, on an earlier thread, coined the term: “Obama bin lying”…I think it’s funny.
BOBO bin lying
OMG JIM — I can see that as the perfect 527 ad!
Well done DNC, you definitely backed a winner. Not.
So by your logic — Mr. FUCK face — if we don’t have Senator Clinton to vote for — we might as well vote for McCain!!
You Obamabots are the dumbest bunch of half wits to come along in ages.
Obama cult members who use cult-speak.
ALL of the Obamabot nitwits belong in a nut house.
amen, as a hillary supporter in texas i saw first hand the divisiveness of the obama campaign, they left no room for unity, they are incredible hypocrites. you reap what you sow.
You are so right. Hillary supporters join us here where you will be able to post without harrassment. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1992769/posts You are welcome here–Hillary supporters. We respect what you are doing.
Sensible… Let me ask You this. Do you Hold Barack Obama responsible for What His Supporters say ?? (… or do ??)
Because from what I have seen on this site that is the perception of Most.
President Obama ‘09
http://www.fightthesmears.com/
If this tape turns out to be nothing more than smear it will only hurt those who started the rumor if we ever even find out who they are.Hillary or Mac aren’t responsible for what their supporters say.
Larry would gain credibility if it is true and would lose some crediblity for passing on things from sources he deemed reliable.Sensible… Let me ask You this. Do you Hold Barack Obama responsible for What His Supporters say ?? (… or do ??)
Because from what I have seen on this site that is the perception of Most.
President Obama ‘09
http://www.fightthesmears.com/
LOL you’re stuttering you’re so enraged
bullshxx! this should be the reason you know the tape is totally accurate as to what michelle really is. dang, you are really stupid even for a troll.
I will “use all of my present and future
resources to benefit [the Black]community
first and foremost - Michelle Obama
How dare Obama call ANY white a racist after the above garbage from his wife Michelle Obama. I’m outraged that a black can be so obviously racist yet it’s ok.
Blacks know full well they can be racist to a greater degree than any other race and Michelle Obama has given them even more empowerment to do such with her comments (above).
If Obama had been any race other than black he would not have gotten away (so far)with the things of his past and present. When he does get called out on an issue his Obamabots buffer him , like lemmings they merge.
By doing this buffer scenario Obama himself has given his flock a sense of being, a purpose, a false purpose of course but the lemmings don’t care, they are deceived into thinking their purpose is noble. When Obama is done with them, then they get tossed under the bus.
It’s a sad commentary indeed when the lemmings converge for a false prophet of HOPE, lol.
There is nothing racist about any of the comments attributed to Michelle Obama and you have NO idea what she was talking about without reading her thesis or at least a few paragraphs of her thesis.
There is a black community and she has every right to support it. That does not mean she would not support the greater community. In fact, since the black community is a subset of the larger community she is helping both.
Has anyone noticed the parenthesis around the word (black)? That means it’s implied and she didn’t say it.
Do you know what an ellipsis is? (…) That means the quote has a big missing piece of text.
Do you know what a thesis is?
STOP trying to make a mountain out of a mole hill. This is such obvious BS. People should mistrust bloggers and pundits who deliberately mislead them instead of thinking, “Ya. That’s what I wanted to hear along.”
By the way, when did Senator Obama ever call anyone a racist?
If her thesis wasn’t under lock and key, there would be no parsing of it. If she’s/he’s not concerned about the content, why the big hushhush … you see? You logic is just not working here.
I had no idea who Carmichael was but when I just yelled over to my MOM and asked her…………. she said “Stokley Carmichael? who was guided by him?” she jumped up and came over to read and is NOW sufficiently upset and convinced that there is NO WAY we want MO anywhere NEAR the Whitehouse if this is how she feels.
Mom says “this should immediate disqualify ANY ONE from political office and being the wife of the candidate is especially dangerous as wives have MUCH influence over their husbands!”
of course I agree
IMMEDIATELY Disqualify
She didn’t write that she was guided by him, but that she was using his definition of a concept.
Perhaps you never wrote an analytical paper and don’t get what she’s doing. You could use Hitler’s definition of Nazism in a paper to, you know, define and delineate Nazism. It would not mean you agree with it.
Michelle Obama reminds me of Aunt Esther from the
old Sanford an Sons show.
Is that a smear or free speech?
Please enlighten me commrades.
This is completely off topic, but there are some pics here of Father Pfleger worth checking out. Also, scroll down for a peak at the Crap Cannon.
http://patterico.com/2008/06/12/exclusive-kozinskis-porn-images-from-judge-alex-kozinskis-web-site/
@Clydesloppers “But if it is true and is released well, then let’s talk.”
If the tape turns out to be true, which I think it is very likely, then we will not talk we will demand she be burned at the stake and we will run Obama out of the country.
Frankly, if someone doesn’t release that video immediately, I would hope NO ONE would ever mention it again. It’s looking like a bad joke right now.
One more article on “does the tape exist” and not a soul will care if it is ever released. It’s reached “chicken little” status and the sky is NOT falling.
Amen. She knew and was guided by someone who at times used the term whitey. This is a story? Where’s the tape? Not one person has come forward to say they heard this tape. All we hear is that someone spoke to someone who was told that they know someone that heard the tape. What a crock.
Hey. That woman ain’t too literate. LMAO
zOMG! HALP US BAROK O’BOMBA– WE R STUCK HEAR N ALTOONA!!!!! SAV Uz!!!
LOL
Love it…
Must say, I LOVE the photos of Michelle in this article. I hope that front page one is used over and over and over again the way the Hillary opposition used photos that caught her with a surprised look they could exaggerate into looking crazy.
I will download the photo and use it as much as I can.
Maybe you can lock yourself in the bathroom with it, Bcuz!
and hope your mother doesn’t catch you!
I have PhD too and I know that Michelle Obama had a wide range of people to choose from for her thesis. Of the three she chose, Stokely Carmichael is one.
What Carmichael said isn’t shocking, in it’s context of Black Separatism.
What’s shocking is that some idiots think it would be nifty to have a racist First Lady whose world view includes the extreme racism of Carmichael, Farrakhan, Wright as well as her own clear distrust and dislike of White people.
WOWEEE, Bud White and Medusa!
Fantastic post.
The thing that bothers me most, is that this would be dismissed as “racism” for even delving into the subject.
But if it’s factually based…how can it be so easily ignored/dismissed?
Thank you for this post!
It is true destardi. On one of the websites, no quarter I think they have a copy of MO thesis. She is so racist!!!
She is unworldly.
The two are the black equivalent of the Beverly Hillbillies.
The perfect couple to lead mainstream America.
that’s why everyone thinks O is as bad a letter as W and BOTH look like mirror images of Alfred E Neuman.
medusa — can you imagine if these two got into the White House with all their hatred–they would make the entire country bow and scrape to them.
I can’t see my post…
Niether can I…
If you mouse higlighted a section to paste or proofread it might have been erased had you hit backspace and enter buttons at about the same time…
but folks are replying to a specific point I made… wierd.
Can you see it now. heh.
Seriously, sometimes that happens.
still can’t.
Oh well, the point I tried to make is that the passage from Michelle Obama may sound “shocking” outside of academia… inside it isn’t all that uncommon. And Henry Louis Gates, Jr. has written a lot worse.
Applying “the-shoe-on-the-other-foot” test to any other politician, this would make obama toast in the media darlings’ eyes. But since even virulent racism is fogiven obama — what’s next, fraud, murder, subversion? — I’m eager to see the media lay down the red carpet for the second coming of Strom Thurmond to American politics. Only this time, it’s us whiteys who need to stand up and defend our heritage!
exactly right.