Hillary Supporters Meet with John McCain
By NoBO on June 18, 2008 at 5:10 PM in Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Carly Fiorina, Chicago, Current Affairs, DNC, Delegates, Democratic National Convention, Dems4McCain, Disenfranchisement, Fox News, Hillary Clinton, John McCain, JustSayNoDeal.Com, Keith Olbermann, Michigan, Misogyny, NObama, Obamedia, PUMA, Qualifications, Republicans, Sexism
Something extremely unusual happened on Saturday afternoon, Flag Day, June 14. A group of about 75 Democrats, ardent Hillary Clinton supporters, met with Senator John McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee for president. Was this some sort of fringe group? Not at all. Just a small cross section of the Democratic party–black, white, Hispanic, Asian, male, female, straight, gay, Liberal to Centrist. So why were we visiting the Arlington, Virginia, campaign headquarters of Senator McCain?
Why We Were There
During a primary season that lasted six months, nearly 18 million voters chose Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton to be the presidential nominee for the Democratic Party. That was more votes than for any primary candidate in American history, and 300,000 votes more than the presumptive nominee received. During the last four months of the campaign, the punditry and the commentariat relentlessly urged Hillary to quit, despite the fact that she was so close in the popular vote and the delegate count.
Never before has any candidate been so incessantly hounded by members of the political commentariat. Not even candidates who were several hundred delegates behind like Ted Kennedy in 1980 who took his fight all the way to the convention. How come no one tried to hound him out of the campaign? The most common answers are sexism, DNC bias, and hatred of the Clintons.
Sexism
The appalling incidents of misogyny and sexism against Hillary exhibited by many members of the broadcast and print media, both male and female, were legion during this campaign. There were daily sexist jokes against Hillary during the monologues of both Jay Leno, the worst perpetrator, and David Letterman. The worst broadcast network was NBC and the worst cable network was MSNBC, with CNN a close second.
The sexism was used as a weapon by stations owned by NBC which include MSNBC, CNBC and several local stations. General Electric owns NBC so the question is, where did the order for the bias originate, GE or NBC news? Who’s the bad guy in this, the head of NBC News or the CEO of GE? My vote for worst person in the world goes to Keith Olbermann. This article in The New Yorker sheds some light on him: ONE ANGRY MAN.
Most commendable throughout the campaign was Fox News Channel, a station that actually lived up to its slogan, “Fair and Balanced.” A special shout out goes to CBS’ Katie Couric who made a point during her Evening News broadcast of noting the immense level of sexism used against Hillary throughout the campaign. Brava!
Millions of women are outraged at all the sexism and misogyny and take it personally as an attack on them, not just Hillary. They weren’t just attacking a female candidate, they were attacking all women. They were attacking the progress an entire generation of women thought they had made, as my wife put it.
DNC Bias and Hatred of the Clintons
As if the sexism wasn’t bad enough, Hillary was also placed at a disadvantage by her own party throughout the campaign, starting last year. A proposal was passed that went beyond the DNC rules and stripped MI and FL of all delegates for violation of the timing rule. Since those states heavily favored Hillary, she was immediately placed at a disadvantage. It didn’t matter that three other states also violated the timing rule.
A meeting of the Rules and Bylaws Committee (RBC) at the end of May resulted in the seating of all the delegates from those states at the convention, but with half votes, similar to the original DNC sanction for a timing violation. The half vote provision should not have affected superdelegates, but the RBC had no interest in abiding by its own rules.
What really angered Hillary supporters was the arbitrary way in which 59 uncommitted Michigan delegates were assigned to Obama while four earned, pledged delegates were taken away from Sen. Clinton, and given to Obama. That was an outrageous violation of the DNC charter, a blatant disregard of fair reflection, the basic tenet of the party.
That was the last straw for many of Hillary’s supporters, who immediately left the party as a result. Numerous new Web sites and blogs sprang up. To get an idea, see Just Say No Deal.
As for hatred of the Clintons, that’ll have to be another article for another day. Whatever the reasons, there was nothing to warrant the treatment Hillary received during this campaign. Also, nothing warranted the savagely brutal treatment that Hillary’s supporters received at the hands of Obama supporters, both online and in the field.
Bloggers and diarists supporting Hillary were called all sorts of names and dangerous attempts were made to uncover identities. Campaign workers in the field were subjected to name calling, harassment, and sexist remarks by SEIU members in Pennsylvania. Never before had Democrats been subjected to such treatment by fellow Democrats.
As Lou Dobbs often says, what in the world is going on here?
What’s going on is a blatant attempt to seize control of the Democratic party on behalf of the so-called Liberal Elite. They’re the far left of the party that despises the Clintons for their centrist views, despite the fact that Bill Clinton was the most successful Democratic president in 40 years. No other Democrat won as many electoral votes in those four decades and he was the only two-term Democratic president. Democrats lost 7 out of 10 presidential contests in the last 40 years.
Now, the far left is attempting to seize control of the party, taking over and remaking the party in Obama’s image, in a ruthless attempt to oust the Clinton faction. They’re even going so far as to move the DNC to Chicago and force party members to work for the Obama campaign. Should they be successful, there will no longer be a Democratic Party, just the Obama Party. And the co-mingling of DNC and Obama staffs–and possibly funds–will undermine election law limits.
Senator Clinton suspended her campaign for the nomination on Saturday, June 7. She said she endorses Sen. Barack Obama and that we, her supporters, should support him. Sorry, Hillary, as much as we love you, many of us cannot do that.
We have come to know Sen. Obama far too well to be able to support him in any way. Some of us have already changed our party affiliation, some to Independent while others have switched to the Republican Party. Many of us have joined the PUMA movement which originally stood for Party Unity My Ass.
We’ve had it with the far left, the Liberal elitists, with Obama and his mean, vicious, thuggish supporters.
We all continue to support Hillary and still want her to win the nomination, hoping against hope that something will happen to change the minds of wayward delegates who have gone astray from our Liberal ideals. We’re hoping they will come to learn the true nature of Sen. Obama so that they will shy away from him the way we have. We don’t trust him and can never vote for him. We think Sen. Obama represents a threat to this country, that he’s far worse than president Bush.
So, while Sen. Obama is planning to build a new basketball court in the White House, some of us are exploring our options. Many of us are considering voting for Senator John McCain.
Meeting With Senator John McCain
A bunch of us attended a special virtual and real town hall meeting for Hillary supporters on Saturday, June 14. It was part of his “Citizens for McCain” grassroots effort. We thought the Senator would be elsewhere and that it was to be a conference call event. We didn’t learn until the night before that Sen. McCain would actually be there. It was held in the McCain for President headquarters in Crystal City, in Arlington, Virginia. RNC Victory Chair Carly Fiorina, former CEO of Hewlett Packard, accompanied the Senator.
The women with McCain’s team were very impressive and extremely nice. They understood we were lifelong liberal Democrats who were considering voting for a Republican for the very first time. I tried to explain that it wasn’t out of anger or disappointment but out of fear for our country.
It was a very good meeting, full of Hillary’s supporters, many of them from NYC, in full Hillary regalia. John McCain made a short statement about his policies and positions, followed by lots of Q&As from attendees in Arlington, and conference call participants, mostly women from Ohio and Pennsylvania. Sen. McCain was very complimentary of Hillary, making a special point of complimenting her on her campaign.
Everyone was very pleased to be there, and Sen. McCain was in good spirits. The questions were all very good, and McCain’s answers were clear, concise, and direct. There were also some good laughs during the Q&A. One of the callers was a fire chief from a town in Ohio. McCain said he’d like to come visit and be shown around town. The caller happily agreed.
After the Q&A, McCain mingled with the crowd, signed autographs, and spent quite a bit of time chatting with individuals, including Harriet Christian, whom you may have seen being ejected from the May 31 RBC meeting. John McCain knew who Harriet was and was very happy to see her and she him.
Here she is on Fox discussing her meeting with John McCain, for whom she will vote despite his position on abortion. McCain’s position is irrelevant because he said he wouldn’t have a litmus or ideological test for judges. They just have to be qualified. He voted for Breyer and Ginsberg, for example. He held Roberts up as an example of the type of judge he would nominate.
He was very personable and easy to talk with. He reminds me a bit of Harry Truman. My father once walked along with him on one of his regular walks around the White House block. That was back when you could have that kind of access to your president.
The Senator even posed for some group photos, and I managed to snap a few with my iPhone.
Click here to view the Web gallery. (Note the display options at the bottom and the download button above the photos on the left.)
As you can see, the Hillary supporters were very upbeat. I didn’t take detailed notes of the meeting because it was being videotaped and I thought the video would be available on McCain’s Web site at some point.
Hillary supporters there were appalled at what our party has been doing lately and one of the staffers also expressed horror at the DNC’s move to Chicago. What might Obama do to this country with a compliant Congress? We’re looking to McCain as a last resort but we also want to see Hillary reenter the fight. I overheard some Hillary women talking about how much they wish they could still have a woman in the White House.
I know it’s pure fantasy but I’d like to see Hillary protest what’s happening with the DNC and how Obama’s taking it over, remaking it in his own image. I’d like for her not to support Obama at all and start railing against him and the party. Yes, just a fantasy because it looks like Hillary and Barack will be getting together onstage June 26 for a fundraising event.
What impressed me about Sen. John McCain was how forthright he was, how decisive and direct in his answers. No hemming or hawing, no ums or uhs, just simple, direct answers without equivocation. In other words, he sure didn’t come across as someone trying to sell you something, or someone who tailors what he says to who’s listening. Carly Fiorina talked with us after the event, after McCain left, and told us that what we had seen was the real John McCain. I’d have to agree.
I would have absolutely no reservations about voting for him if his opponent is Obama. Meanwhile, I’ll continue to do everything I can to promote Hillary and to defeat Obama, the illegitimate one.


And all of you will know that, because of your passion and hard work, you helped pave the way for that day. So I want to say to my supporters: When you hear people saying or think to yourself, “If only, or, “What if,” I say, please, don’t go there. Every moment wasted looking back keeps us from moving forward.
(APPLAUSE)
Life is too short, time is too precious, and the stakes are too high to dwell on what might have been. We have to work together for what still can be. And that is why I will work my heart out to make sure that Senator Obama is our next president.
(APPLAUSE)
And I hope and pray that all of you will join me in that effort.
- Hillary Clinton, June 7, 2008.
Hillary is not a Goddess (even though she would make a good one). Our country comes first. We must save it from the spineless incompetenet one (i.e., Obama).
The media would tear into her like a pack of animals
if she said anything critical of little OBambi.
She has worked herself to nervous exhaustion and put
up with almost a year of pummeling.
I would ask anyone to go through the hell they would
put her through.
It’s up to us to continue rallying for her, and to
expose Barakula.
Hillary has no choice but to work for Barry. She’s hoping we, her supporters, can read between the lines and hold firm. NoBama Ever!
Exactly, Hillary has to do what she has to do to get her Party back on track. We have to do what we have to do to keep the Country safe from the inexperienced one. They are complementary efforts in the end.
But she didn’t release her delegates and actions speak louder than words.
Let’s show our support by doing the opposite of what she says. Then she’ll know how loyal we are.
We are not blind loyalist like the bots. We haven’t had our brain removed.
LOL You forget she also said she and McCain bring a lifetime of commitment and service but Obama brings a speech. Also, replay her “endorsement” speech. I found it very intersting when she ended with the trademark McCain phrase, “My friends…”
You see Danny, it’s hard for you to comprehend, but we THINK FOR OURSELVES. We do not mindlessly follow an mythical leader, a false messiah. We actually read history, and social policy. We actually research policies and analyze our options. I know it is much easier to go to a big (bussed in) rally and chant someone’s name, but we actually find that shallow and empty.
Like a suit.
Do you always let Barack Obama do your thinking for you?
No, I like to mix it up– in this instance I was quoting Hillary Clinton.
They don’t know how to read between the lines, either.
NOBODY tells me who to vote for. NOBODY.
Here’s another quote for you.
“I’m sick and tired of everyone blaming everything on George Bush. If the news media and the liberals in congress hadn’t bashed him at every turn, he would’ve been able to do all kinds of good those country.” — My husband yesterday
Now, I have loved and been faithful to my husband for 12 years, but he has never been able to influence my vote, which has mostly gone to Democrats. Why in the world would I let some kind of blind loyalty to politician or a political party influence my vote? As someone else has already said, I’m an independent thinker. It’s one of the privileges of living in America.
Lordy, my fingers got away from me. I meant to say “all kinds of good for this country.”
We knew what you meant, Lucinda. You made a good point.
I’m going to support No Deal by buying some of their junk.
Have you seen the T-Shirts?
I LOVE the variety a lot! It’s an array of attitudes, from your true McCain fans to 2nd amendment folks, to sort of hip ones…
My fave: Vote Democrat It beats thinking.
yes, my friends, hrc does know how loyal we are AND that we are independent thinkers who still have free will. danny…you can take your boring posts elsewhere. you are wasting your precious little mental power which you’ll obviously need to pay homage to your lying corrupt false messiah.
Explain to me, Danny, how coming here and harassing us is going to make us want to vote for Obama?
Hey Chavez-
First, if any of my posts were harrassing, I apologize.
As to whether my posts will convince anyone to vote for Obama: there’s a good chance they won’t. But a guy can dream, right? Mostly, I just wanted to find out first hand why so many Clinton supporters are now backing McCain– a candidate who disagrees with her on almost every major issue.
As an aside, for a bunch of people who claim to be independent thinkers, and who call Obama supporters drones, you’re not very welcoming of someone posting opinions that differ from yours.
f u
Danny, just one answer. TRUST!!!. You don’t have to agree on every single issue to select a Candidate of your second choice.
And…your point?
Consider yourself a lot luckier than we were. We got banned from places you hail from. That’s why we came here. So you will excuse us if we aren’t impressed.
You can dream yes. Dreamers adore Barack Obama, don’t they? But the truth is, we don’t trust him with our country. We don’t trust him with our lives. And we don’t trust him with our rights as women. It doesn’t get anymore hopeless than that, which is kind of odd for a guy who pimps the Hopey Changey plan a lot.
Comment by Danny | 2008-06-18 17:31:55
Let’s show our support by doing the opposite of what she says. Then she’ll know how loyal we are.
EFF U
In the name of Porky Pig, Ya-ba-deeb-a-deeb-a-deeb-a-dee, piss off, Obama.
NomNomNom,
Well spoken.
Well-written Piece, NoBo!
It should be linked from every worthy blog on the web.
Funny that we still get e-mails from her campaign managers stating that she is still in it to win it.
I am so sick of ignorant people like you. What a leech you are. Typical paid sleazy Oblahma supporter. I am disgusted with your ilk. This is not a effing popularity contest you moron. I support experience over sleazy Chicago politics. Obama has no experience and a disgusting history. This no longer is an issue of D -v- R, it has to do with running the country you @ss. If you are stupid enough to vote for some slime from Chicago, you are screwing the rest of us. So PISS OFF you freak.
Country before party. Clinton or McCain ‘08
Roe v. Wade gets thrown in my face all the time by Obamabots. Yes, Obama supports abortion, it’s true. He also supports partial birth abortion. Early abortion is one thing, while killing a fully developed fetus during delivery is another.
She did really well didn’t she? Considering they bullied and threatened the shit out of her.
Hillary also said in March 2008, that like her Senator McCain would bring a lifetime of experience to the Whitehouse and Senator Obama……has a speech he gave in 2002.
If you look at Senator Clintons “suspension” speech she is not telling her supporters to vote for Obama….she told us “18 million of you from all walks of life - women and men, young and old, Latino and Asian, African-American and Caucasian, rich, poor and middle class, gay and straight - you have stood strong with me. And I will continue to stand strong with you, every time, every place, and every way that I can. The dreams we share are worth fighting for.”
Read between the lines…..Hillary is telling us not to give up the fight. “You” appear to be giving up…..”we” are not.
Could you increase the font size, please.
thank you for this post. I was on the conference call and I too came away very happy with my decision to vote for Senator McCain.
I taped the call and have played it for several friends and family members who have gone to join the McCain website and they too have decided to vote for McCain in November!!
Excellent news! We need to spread the word far and wide (it will be easy recruiting, especially when the alternative is a spineless incomepent - - - Obama).
Can you post it somewhere so we can listen to it? I’d like to hear what McCain has to say myself. If he comes off angry and cranky or whatever.
Why? You’re the one who said he got as far in the Navy as he did by affirmative action.
Yeah look at that five year POW promotion he got!
What do you care? You’re another drone who wants to play the Oblahma ‘proveitproveit’ game. I would say do your own research but you are going to attempt to screw the rest of us by voting for the corrupt Obama so who cares what you want. Piss off. Anyone is an improvement of Obama.
John McCain needs to take someone with broad appeal as his running mate. Sarah Palin or Charlie Crist are two strong contenders.
I will support the country first over any party!
Vote McCain in 08′!
I agree that Sarah and Charlie should be on McCain’s short-list.
Save America from Obama . . .vote McCain!
Sarah Palin is a first term Governor of Alaska who weakens McCain’s environmental positions, will come across as a trophy veep to pander to Hillary voters, and she is pregnant with her fifth child (one has Downes.’) McCain needs to win conservatives, and they especially won’t like that last part. Before she was Governor, Sarah Palin was mayor of Wasalia. Are you impressed? No one is. She has a future, but not now. Let her be Governor for a while and raise her babies.
I like Palin on the surface. You guys should do blogs on the options for a Repub VP. I could do more research on my own, but I find the information here pretty good.
Charlie Crist is great and a popular Governor, but McCain doesn’t need too much help with Florida. I’m thinking Gov. Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota will be his veep. THey’re good friends, he has blue collar roots and Conservative creds, and he would help secure the battleground Great Lakes states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Minnesota. He and McCain are good friends, and he’s reputedly a policy wonk who would enjoy the Vice Presidency.
I like Pawlenty, too.
I will say what I admire most about Palin is her strict adherence to ethics.
Although, you’re right, Hope Floats. I think she may be viewed as the token female for Hillary voters
Hi Hope,
I think Palin’s 5th child is born and it is the one with Down. I’m not sure because I’ve only been paying attention to Republicans since April of this year.
For those who are interested in disability issues, Christ is very good on Autism issues. There has been a whispering campaign that he is gay…of course since I was a democrat for 30 years until last week, if he were gay, I’d like him more.
I saw Pawlenty on Fox (the only station I watch now) and he seemed articulate and looked good in a mid western kind of way - but I know nothing about him.
Politicians are used to dealing with dishonest and self serving people, most of them fall into that category. Clinton must support Obama-it’s called political expediency, something Obama does very well. As a voter I don’t need to engage in it. So if Clinton tows the line with the DNC, I’ll understand but I won’t and I’m sure millions out there are like me in that regard.
I found the Larry Sinclair transcript…
http://reflections-in-tyme.blogspot.com/
Was he arrested today on his outstanding fraud warrant?
Apparently. Political arrest? LOL*
His statement is very straightforward, but I haven’t seen anything on the follow-up questions.
We’ve seen it. Ad nauseum.
SEE THIS:
http://www.obama-wire.com/
If you vote McRecession in November have four more years of failed Bush economics, from a Candidate who was happy to admit he knew nothing of Economics and have on your conscience every family that loses their home as a result of Rethug incompetence.
McCain is our only option (obama is a spineless unqualified incompetent).
Cynthia McKinney is also an option. And unlike McCain, her policies are not polar opposites of Hillary’s.
In your dreams, dumbsh^t. I’m voting the guy who’ll kick your guy’s a$$. Dems aren’t my party any more, I’m now registered Independent. You don’t have a clue what my views are.
I’m not giving up my right to vote, thx. And I’m making sure the guy who thinks I don’t have a right to vote for my own candidate and have it count for my candidate goes down.
Hey NomNom-
You’re right, I don’t know your views. I guess I assumed you were a Clinton supporter, and therefore that you agreed with Clinton on issues like health care, taxes, Iraq, and education– issues where Clinton and McCain differ starkly. Then I assumed that you’d want to support someone who agreed with the Clinton positions rather than the McCain positions. I can understand that you don’t want to vote for Obama, but I don’t see how supporting McCain will advance any of the ideals Clinton fought for. Clearly I went wrong somewhere, feel free to explain how (preferably without calling me a dumbsh^t).
We do not trust Barack Obama with our country.
We do not trust Barack Obama with our lives.
We do not trust Barack Obama with our rights as women.
We do not trust Barack Obama’s political intentions.
Hope this clears things up.
I guess I assumed oops.
Clearly I went wrong somewhere Ya think?
Cynthia McKinney? Are you serious?
She’s more along the lines of Michelle Obama than Hillary Clinton. She’s just another white hater.
Some of us actually know who Cynthia McKinney is. She is another radical leftist. She has been known to praise Hugo Chavez.
Does no one remember the stink she made about having to (let’s all gasp here) actually walk through the metal detector at the Capitol building. Oh, horror of horrors.
She had a completely different hairstyle, and she was so incensed that the guard didn’t recognize her that she punched him in the chest when he asked for her ID.
Is this the best you can lure us with? Cynthia McKinney is Obama in drag, without the pretense of social graces.
No to Obama, no to McKinney.
Yes to Hillary or McCain!
Danny, Danny, Danny,
We don’t need your suggestions. We don’t want your suggestions. Don’t you get it, we like to think for ourselves, and we’ve made up our minds. Nobama. McCain 2008 unless Hillary is our nominee
Yes, you’re right..because someone who knows “nothing” about economics, even though he’s been a Senator for over 20 years, while Barackula is in his first term of the national senate..after 10 years as a part-time state senator (yea, look that up), is worse than a guy who
USES THE WORST TABOO IN AMERICA, RACE, to divide the party and gain votes.
Yes, that just DRIPS with class, and “unity.”
“Fairy tale” racist?
“LBJ and MLK” racist?
Reagan=good?
Bill Clinton=bad?
McCAIN 08, because he’s no obama! (Hillary 2012!!!!)
Pardon me, but when did Obama use the word “racist” in his reaction to the “fairy tale” comment or the LbJ/MLK comment (which frankly was a pretty weird road for Hillary to be going down to begin with). When EXACTLY did Obama specifically USE race to “divide the country”. There is more projection here than in a movie theater.
He used his surrogates. So he didn’t get any of his own shit on him. Those days will be gone soon.
Can’t you come up with a different set of words. This stuff is beginning to sound like a broken record. At least utilize the richness of the language. Or are you not allowed to think for yourself?
If you vote for Obama in November and he is elected, expect the biggest rush out of the stock market and other investments that you have ever seen. We may be in or close to a recession now, but it’s nothing like you will see if Obama becomes our president with a democratic majority in congress.
you really should make an attempt to know what McCain is about instead of ranting about some point the dems try to tell you is fact.
i was on that tele-conference call also — all I want to say is that these Obots repeating the non-sense that BHO and the Dems put into their heads for them to recite ad nauseam that McCain is the same as Bush need to wake up and think for them selves and maybe go out and read some of the facts before regurgitating obama bullshit. if these bots had a brain they might look a little deeper and see just how much BHO is more like Bush then McCain. As a conservative democrat I have absolutely no reservations about voting for the better candidate, so my vote for McCain is not a protest vote. There are numerous other ways that I am showing my protest against the democratic party for what they have done.
Hmmmm Bush Cheney Oil tax give away Bill, compare the candidates:
McCain vote: Nay
Obama Vote: Yea
Who has failed policies and follows Bush?
Isn’t it a shame there are records to actually prove what politicians say vs what they do?
yup…..and I already know his word is worth absolutely nothing.
He doesn’t even explain his flip-flops. He just flops and then refuses to address the issue.
Flip-Flop on NAFTA is now, “Heated rhetoric of a typical campaign.”
So that means, I should pay no attention to him whatsoever now, too. It will later just be “heated rhetoric of a typical campaign.”
I’ll base my vote on the real voting record of real politicians…..no upon image or “heated rhetoric.”
If I remember correctly, it wasn’t just “heated rhetoric”. This position was written in flyers and mailers from the Obama campaign.
The Obama campaign used President Clinton’s support for NAFTA Senator Clinton. It was an attack launched heavily in the press by the Obama campaign.
If I remember correctly, it wasn’t just “heated rhetoric”. This position was written in flyers and mailers from the Obama campaign.
The Obama campaign used President Clinton’s support for NAFTA against Senator Clinton. It was an attack launched heavily in the press by the Obama campaign.
What the hell do you Obama knows? Not a thing about anything but gratuity.
If you vote Obomba in November have four more years of failed Bush economics, from a Candidate who was happy to lie that he knew everything and have on your conscience every family that loses their home and women who can look forward to more sexism as a result of Rethug and Demotraitor incompetence.
Stay out of US politics, UK. Go back there and be racist in your own hole.
Obama’s advisors are all neocons. Austin Goolsbee is straight Chicago School. He just took on Jason Furman, the biggest Wal-Mart lover ever. Hillary got heat for her board position, but she was retained for four meetings a year. She was a strong advocate for women bein promoted to managerial positions. She also learned quite a bit about macroeconics. Still, Obama called her a NAFTA-lover and job remover. Three days after she’s out, he is “a free market guy.” All about globalism. I bet that’s what he and Bloomberg met on earlier. No VP shot, but for some economic advice and future favors, they likely worked out a deal. However, Bloomberg is not an adviser. McCain at least has a good diverse team. Don Luskin, very libertarian, a bit of a gold bug, big skeptic of the Fed. Pete Peterson, Reagan boom a “mad, drunken bash” and thinks steep tax increases on income, gasoline, tobacco, and alcohol, on top of a 5 percent consumption tax, are necessary to put the government’s finances in order. Jack Kemp who is on the PPT and the guy who turned Reagan onto supply side economics. McCain’s list may very well reveal a refreshingly nonideological approach to policy making that will prove popular in our post-partisan era of change and the future. It is a very sensible yet open-minded approach that I find refreshing after McCain admitted the economy is his weakest point. He has good advisers, better than Obama’s.
It might be interesting to know that someone in the UK likes Obama, but this is an American election.
Your Prime Minister, Gordon Brown shares the political stripes of Obama. The UK is also on the brink of a recession with their own housing, banking, and energy crisis.
And their food sucks.
Haven’t you heard? George W. Obama doesn’t know anything about economics either. His economic advisors have been semi-retired for the last 15-20 years and G.w.O. is credited with having 50 year old economic ideas.
I wonder if the Obamaniacs will boo Hillary when she appears with Obama!
probably…..that’s OK. She was shunned badly when she showed up to AA events. The Obama campaign made sure of that.
Events HE didn’t show up to.
Hell, I don’t need any convincing. I would vote for any Senators with more than 1 term on their belt over BO. Nuff said.
143 days of “experience” in the Senate with zero accomplishments.
Yes Obama did, he passed a Bill to recognize the Demcray of the Congo and a Bill renaming a Post Office, two vital pieces of legislation needed to make America strong and and and…..
Shit Kool Aide wear off meltdown…..lol
Obama himself has said that he lacks experience
http://youtube.com/watch?v=4gexyfVpFMU
That was probably “heated rhetoric” too.