RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

The Larry Sinclair Saga

Up to this point we have stayed away from the Larry Sinclair story. Larry alleges he did drugs and had consensual sex with Barack Obama. The Obama folks have gone crazy over the Sinclair allegations. Larry had a press conference today at the National Press Club. It was well attended. Shortly after the press conference ended, Larry was arrested. (I am sure this will encourage other folks to come forward and speak out (snark).) Here is Larry’s statement. Decide for yourself.

Good afternoon, my name is Larry Sinclair and I am a former recreational drug user and trafficker, a convicted felon for crimes of forgery, bad checks and theft by check. I am also an American who loves this country and I cannot stay silent regarding Barack Obama knowing what I know.

Today I will discharge my obligation as a citizen to witness this knowledge to you and raise questions for others to investigate and consider. I am going to briefly describe my background, my experience with Senator Obama in 1999, what appears to me to be a coordinated effort to discredit me and finally a list of questions. After this brief statement, I will take and try to answer any reasonable questions.

Background

I am 46 years old and I currently reside in Duluth, MN. I am a US Citizen, and I have made mistakes in my lifetime. I have been convicted and served prison sentences for writing bad checks, forging checks, using stolen credit card numbers in Arizona, Florida and Colorado. These event’s occurred over twenty (20) years ago between 1980 thru 1986. After going public on the internet with these claims against Senator Obama earlier this year, I became aware of a warrant out of Florida from 1986 which I have resolved and it has now been dismissed. I also have an active “Colorado Only” warrant for alleged “Theft and Forgery”. I am not ignoring this warrant but am addressing it with the Court in Colorado as well as with the DA’s office. I have a pending motion to dismiss this warrant which I am waiting to have calendared by the Colorado Court.

I have lived and worked under three different names. My birth name is Lawrence W. Sinclair. Later on, I had my name legally changed first to La-Rye A. Silvas, and then La-Rye Vizcarra Avila. The last two were legal name changes granted by the court in Penal County Superior Court, Florence Arizona. I legally returned to my birth name in the Fremont County District court, Canon City, Colorado in 1997. Obama Incident

I flew out of Colorado Springs, Colorado to Chicago on November 2, 1999, arriving in O’Hare early in the morning of November 3, 1999. I went to the Chicago area to attend the graduation of my god son (my best friend’s son) from basic training from the Great Lakes Navy Training Center. I made reservations at the Comfort Inn and Suites in Gurnee, IL based on location to the Navy Training center. On November 5, 1999, I hired the services of Five Star Limo. I had hired them for both November 5 and November 6. On November 6, 1999, I asked the limo driver – whose name I now reveal for the first time – Paramjit Multani, if he knew anyone who would like to socialize and show me Chicago. Paramjit Multani understood that I was not looking for someone who knew Chicago and would enjoy socializing. Paramjit Multani said he knew someone who was a friend of his.

On November 6, 1999 after picking me up at the Hotel in Gurnee– and this is significant – Paramjit Multani used his cellphone to make a call. That call was made to then-Illinois State Senator Barack Obama to set up an introduction between me and Senator Obama. Upon arriving at the bar and exiting the Limo, Senator Obama was standing next to Paramjit Multani and I was introduced to Senator Obama. Later that evening at a bar which I believe was called Alibis, I mention I could use a line or two to wake up. Senator Obama asked me if I was referring to “coke” and after stating I was, Obama stated he could purchase cocaine for me and then made a telephone call – and this too is significant — from his cellphone to a presently unknown individual during which Senator Obama arranged the cocaine purchase.

Senator Obama and I then departed the bar in my limousine and proceeded to an unknown location where Senator Obama exited the limousine with two hundred fifty dollars ($250) I had given him and returned a short while later with an “eightball” of cocaine which he gave to me. I did ingest a couple of lines of cocaine, and shortly thereafter Senator Obama produced a glass cylinder pipe and packet of crack cocaine from his pants pocket and Obama smoked the crack cocaine. I performed fellatio on Senator Obama in the limousine during the time Senator Obama was smoking crack cocaine, after which I had the driver take me to the my hotel, The Comfort Suits, Gurnee, Illinois.

The following day, November 7, 1999, Senator Obama appeared at my hotel room where we again ingested cocaine and I again performed fellatio on Senator Obama. Significantly, both the driver’s telephone call to Senator Obama and his call to the drug dealer should appear on the driver’s and Senator Obama’s cellphone billing statements. Fall 2007

In September 2007 I contacted the Presidential Campaign of Barack H. Obama, to request solely that Senator Obama publicly correct his stated drug use record to reflect his use of crack cocaine with me in November 1999. When I made that first contact I left with the Presidential Campaign of Senator Barack H. Obama a telephone number for the campaign to return my call. The first number I provided was a Texas cell phone number. From the period of Labor day weekend 2007 through November 18, 2007 I did rovide a total of four (4) different call back numbers to the Obama campaign, as I had moved and had changed the numbers to reflect locally my place of residence at the time. In late September to early October 2007, I received a call from a male who identified himself as a “Mr. Young” stating he was calling in regards to calls I had made to the Obama campaign. This first call was in fact an attempt by “Mr. Young” to obtained from me the identities of anyone I had contacted concerning my 1999 allegations against Senator Obama. This first called shocked me in that this “Mr. Young” asked me why I had not asked Senator Obama to disclose the sexual encounters I had with Mr. Obama in 1999. I was shocked as I had never mentioned to the campaign or anyone working for the campaign any sexual encounters as my call was prompted by drug allegations only. The call ended with “Mr. Young” stating I would hear from someone in a few days.

In mid to late October 2007, I received a second call from this “Mr. Young” at which time I clearly became aware that this individual was personally involved with Senator Obama rather than just an employee of his campaign. The tone of the conversation had a sexual nature. “Mr. Young” did not once advise me how he obtained my phone number which by this time had now changed to a Delaware number.

In late October 2007, I received a text message from the gentleman identified as “Mr. Young” in which he stated he was intimately involved with Senator Obama and that Obama was discussing with him and his pastor how to publicly acknowledge Senator Obama’s drug use in 1999 and that Obama wanted to be sure I had not discussed the sexual encounters or drug incidents with any media at that time.

In mid to late November 2007, in another text message from “Mr. Young” , he advised me that Senator Obama will publicly correct his statement as to he last time he used drugs and I did not need to concern myself with publicly disclosing it myself. The last contact I had with “Mr. Young” was in early December 2007 when he made it clear to me that Senator Obama had no intentions of publicly acknowledging his 1999 use of crack cocaine and that “Mr. Young” was in fact doing nothing more than milking information from me for Senator Obama’s use.

I later learned that a Donald Young was the choir director of Reverend Wright’s Trinity United Church of Christ – Obama’s now-former church — and was openly a homosexual. I also learned that he was murdered on December 23, 2007. I have cooperated with the Chicago Police Department in this matter by providing them the telephone numbers I was using during the fall of 2007 and I release them now publically in the hope that someone may be able to connect the dots between these telephone numbers and Mr. Young. Those numbers are: 954-758-1105; 956-758-1885; 956-758-8002; 302-685-7175; 612-466-1043. 2008

In what I now realize was a naive and un-counseled decision, I posted in January 2008 a video on YouTube.com where I related the above information regarding my liaisons with Senator Obama in 1999. The response was overwhelming and I quickly became the recipient of what in hindsight appears to have been a coordinated attack on my character with ever increasing falsehoods circulating on the internet.

In response I agreed to take a polygraph test from Whitehouse.com. The results of that test have been partially revealed to the end of labeling me a liar and taken as gospel by all. I would like to make the following comments about that polygraph test. First, I have been subsequently advised that Whitehouse.com was a website dedicated to anti-Clinton pornography until earlier this year. Second, I have now come to understand that lie detectors are junk science at best which is why courts of law refuse to use them. Third, a review of the results by George W. Maschke, Ph.D. of AntiPolygraph.org raises serious questions about the legitimacy of the examination. Indeed, overlooked by almost everyone is that hitehouse.com’s own examiner, Dr. Gordon Barland, observed that on the drug question regarding Senator Obama that the computerized score found that there was less than a 1% probability of deception by me. That’s about as high a passing score as one can possibly attain.

Finally, in February 2008 I was told anonymously that Dan Parisi of Whitehouse.com received $750,000 from the Obama campaign through AKR Media to organize an effort to publically discredit me. When I confronted Dan Parisi with this allegation, he did not deny it but instead withdrew the second exonerating polygraph report of Dr. Gordon Barland, failed to post the video of my polygraph as he and Whitehouse.com promised they would do, and even removed posts from their web site altogether, claiming that they had “had enough of the attacks by Sinclair’s supporters and Sinclair himself.”

The polygraph results - as misrepresented – were immediately seized upon by the blogger community and I became the subject of vicious lies about me. I was forced to file a lawsuit in an attempt to stop those lies about me that have been circulating. That lawsuit sought to obtain the proof of what I was saying about my contact with Senator Obama through subpoenas for the identities of the anonymous bloggers so they could be linked to the Obama campaign and relevant records of the cellphone companies to prove the truth of my allegations. To date, though the lawsuit is now over ninety days old, Judge Kennedy has refused to permit the suit to move forward so this evidence may be obtained. Conclusion

In sum, you can discredit my story and then make your decision on who should be the next President of the United States. The burden is now off me as I have told my story without the distortions that have been intentionally heaped on me in what my lawyer tells me is an ad hominem attack – shoot the messenger so you don’t have to hear the message he is bringing. I am now done. It is for others to find the corroborating evidence of my story by locating the limousine driver – Paramjit Multani – and the telephone numbers related to Donald Young and/or Senator Obama. I leave you with these questions that I have asked of Senator Obama but which he – who wants to be the next President of the United States – has refused to answer:

1. Why won’t Senator Obama provide his cellphone numbers and telephone records for all his personal and official cell phones held by him for the time period of November 3, 1999 thru November 8, 1999, when we met?

2. Why won’t Senator Obama provide his cellphone numbers and telephone records for all his personal and official cell phones held by Senator Obama or September 2007 – December 23, 2008, the murder of Donald Young?

3. Why won’t Senator Obama provide all email communication both personal and campaign related to and/or from AKP Message & Media from January 18, 2008 through February 29, 2008 for Senator Obama, David Axelrod and David Plouffe?

4. Why won’t Senator Obama provide proof of all payments made from AKP Message & Media, Obama for America, David Axelrod, David Plouffe, and Senator Obama’s accounts for the period of January 18, 2008 through February 29, 2008?

On my website – larrysinclair.org – you will find the documents that I have referred to in this statement. A copy of the home page for that website is attached. Thank you for your time and attention this afternoon and I will now take any questions.

And, here is a snippet of the press conference:

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post892 Comments »

Comment by Pavlov's Dog | 2008-06-18 22:22:05

Where is the “whitey” video sparky?

Comment by Madam DeFarge | 2008-06-18 22:25:29

Three gay men in Obama’s church will never tell.

Comment by Kent | 2008-06-18 22:48:13

But where’s the whitey tape??

Comment by Joe | 2008-06-18 22:53:20

Why don’t you ask McCain’s campaign manager?

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-18 23:33:55

So much to choose from he has. The whitey tape over here or the crack smoking man sex allegations over there. Decisions, decisions … so many decisions.

Comment by Quartermaster | 2008-06-18 23:42:48

Lime green background? Or make Rudy Giuliani, who I claimed had no national security experience, my point man on national security? Decisions decisions.

We come for the tape, Larry. Where’s the tape?

Comment by Joe | 2008-06-19 00:26:21

Admit it, you’re here for crack cocaine, just like your Messiah.

Comment by btintaos | 2008-06-19 09:27:31

Buy Crack Obama.

 
 

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 00:29:09

We’re not sure. It really depends how many man whore crack addicts BOBO could have handed the tape it off to.

 

Comment by Ai1een | 2008-06-19 01:49:38

Larry never once said he had the whitey tape. In fact, he always went out of his way to say that he did not have it & had not personally seen it. However, why don’t you ask Democratic Strategist and strong supporter of Barack Obama, Bob Beckel. HE CONFIRMED THAT THERE WAS A “WHITEY” TAPE as told to him by what he called his totally reliable Republican resources. Bob Beckel LOVES Obama - he does not want there to be a “whitey” tape, believe me and yet he said there IS a whitey tape out there. Larry never claimed to have the whitey tape so you might want to quit rehashing the Grand Inquisition night after night. It only reinforces everyone’s belief in your profound ignorance.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 01:59:57

Please don’t try to confuse the BOBOweenies with facts. They have talking points to talk and point.

 

Comment by undercoverblackman | 2008-06-19 02:14:00

Actually, Aileen, Bob Beckel said on Fox News’ “Strategy Room” on Sunday that the “whitey” tape was an unfounded rumor that he’d tried to “knock down,” and he criticized Fox for having GOP smear artist Roger Stone on their air spreading the lie.

So you are woefully ill-informed, milady.

Comment by Karma | 2008-06-19 02:23:48

Bob Beckel was trying to back pedal.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4RwE9QWhtE

He first statement wasn’t about ‘knocking down’ a smear, but reporting that he was concerned.

Comment by undercoverblackman | 2008-06-19 04:47:29

Ah. Right you are. Now… why would Beckel “try to back pedal” if he were convinced that the “whitey” tape exists? Wouldn’t that make him look like an idiot when the tape is eventually released?

(Comments wont nest below this level)

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-06-19 06:27:30

Quit trying to deke and change the subject. Crack cocaine and illicit sex with a man TOPS WHITEY.

 
 

Comment by Karma | 2008-06-19 11:35:51

No, it would make him cautious.

Larry Johnson has actually been more cautious about the tape, unfortunately reading comprehension isn’t a strong suit among Obama trolls. ;)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 

Comment by stodghie | 2008-06-19 09:27:47

i saw the original statement. you are a liar.

 
 

Comment by whatiswrong | 2008-06-19 08:41:25

What are we supposed to make of this and then the absence of any tape -

“New and dramatic developments. This is a heads up. I’ll post the news Monday morning by 0900 hours. Now I know why people who have seen the videotape say it is stunning. Barack’s headaches are only starting.”

Well his headache didn’t start now did it?

 
 

Comment by roseeriter | 2008-06-19 04:42:13

Now the obamabots apply DIVERSION tactics.
If there is a whitey tape it PALES in comparison if Larry Sinclair is telling the truth. Sure is a lot of details for a lie.

If Nobama is still doing crack that would explain a lot of the hems and haws when he speaks without a teleprompter.

Comment by undercoverblackman | 2008-06-19 04:49:41

“Sure is a lot of details for a lie.”

But just the right amount of details for a psychotic delusion, no?

Comment by Tyrione | 2008-06-19 14:08:06

But just the right amount of details for a psychotic delusion, no?

Is this a professional evaluation or your laymen’s attempt at impersonating a psychiatrist?

 
 

Comment by Karl Rove | 2008-06-19 11:08:40

“If there is a whitey tape it PALES in comparison if Larry Sinclair is telling the truth.”

And if Larry Sinclair isn’t telling the truth?

What next, pray tell, will be the next “outrageous accusations!!” that you’ll all cling to like shit on a stick?

“OBAMA’S SECRET THREE WAY WITH NORQUIST AND DeLAY ON FLOOR OF SENATE!”

“OBAMA PERSONALLY TRANSPORTS ILLEGALS INTO COUNTRY TO WORK ON MITT ROMNEY’S LAWN”

“OBAMA FLEW PLANE INTO WTC”

You guys are utterly hilarious. You make the tin-foil industry proud.

Comment by ulahane | 2008-06-19 11:10:58

That Obama just broke his promise on public financing? Oh wait, that’s not an accusation, that’s documented.

Comment by Karl Rove | 2008-06-19 12:00:40

How does that answer the question:

And if Larry Sinclair isn’t telling the truth?

What next, pray tell, will be the next “outrageous accusations!!” that you’ll all cling to like shit on a stick?

So much outrage towards Obama’s public financing issue. I trust you will be addressing McCain’s own public finance issues as aggressively as Obama’s, no?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by jack, too | 2008-06-19 00:01:44

The limo driver called Obama.

Nuff said, whitey!

 

Comment by alee21 | 2008-06-19 07:04:13

keep on topic: this is sinclair.
Obamaites are deluded and delusional, following like sheep their cult leader.

Comment by Darwin | 2008-06-19 07:17:41

Wow, it’s true. This is the freak-show website. You people do exist, but your lines will not. Natural selection has a way of ending your contributions to the gene pool.

Amazing.

Comment by bodemokrat | 2008-06-19 07:31:24

Hey Darwin, Barry should be more concerned about us ending our contributions to the DNC and his lame-o cmpaign-o!
please remember BOWL big time in November!

Comment by Tom Hilton | 2008-06-19 10:30:26

Hey Darwin, Barry should be more concerned about us ending our contributions to the DNC and his lame-o cmpaign-o!

Oh, I imagine they’ll do just fine without that $1.37.

 
 

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 07:55:25

The opposite is actually true. If we’re truly as recklessly idiotic as you suggest, then our genes triumph. Such is life. As for you, Darwin…
We all sprang from apes, but you didn’t spring far enough.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Leisa | 2008-06-18 23:30:09

Dear Pavlov’s Dog,

Are you really using a conditioned animal as a posting name?

Do you salivate as KO or Mathews do at the mere thought of reporting a smear against Hillary?

Drool all you want at the idea that you are somehow discrediting this site…

Many know that the MSM is refusing to do their job yet again… just like when GWB was pushing for action in Iraq…

 

Comment by Give Me Hill | 2008-06-19 00:24:36

Hmm, I’m not sure what to make of it. (And I am the farthest thing you can get from being an Obama supporter!!) I live in Gurnee, where Mr. Sinclair said he stayed because of the proximity to the naval base. It’s about a 15-20 minute drive, and there are closer motels to the naval base. The other things I question are, why would the limo driver call Obama, a public official to bring what Mr. Sinclair was “looking for”? And, again with the geographics, Gurnee is an hour from Chicago, I certainly know that. A public official traveling an hour to bring someone an illegal substance? It’s certainly possible, and I wouldn’t put anything past Obama at this point, but I’m not sure how likely. If only we could see the phone records I feel the story would hold more water. At the same time, however, I’m not sure Mr. Sinclair is just doing this for publicity… so I’d love for the phone records to be released. Until then, we can only (unfortunately) speculate.

Comment by Joe | 2008-06-19 00:40:38

If you are dying of a brain tumor as he reveals in his press conference, you don’t really have much reason left to lie in public, especially if your last days are going to be turned upside down by the Obama zombies craving to tear you to shreds.

BTW, a couple of pictures from the press conference were posted at hillaryclintonforum.net. Looks like the Obama zombies will have a harder time trying to squash this sordid story about their Savior.

http://tinyurl.com/3w3j2h

Comment by schtum | 2008-06-19 01:12:07

Unless of course, he’s lying about the brain tumor. The crimes he’s been convicted of–writing bad checks, forging checks and using stolen credit cards–are all just different forms of lying. The man is a convicted liar. Let’s see his medical records.

Comment by Ms. Independent | 2008-06-19 02:17:22

Don’t bother arguing facts with this crowd. This website was derided by none other than the New York Times for the obviously fake “whitey” tape. It continues to lose credibility by talking about this story which is frankly so unbelievable that a toddler should be able to see through it.

Comment by Joe | 2008-06-19 02:23:25

Then why are you here if you think this and the people in it are so beneath you, Ms. Elitist?

Comment by Ms. Independent | 2008-06-19 02:45:45

It makes me laugh.

 
 

Comment by Karma | 2008-06-19 02:48:18

Oh you mean the NYT that carried the Bush Admin’s water about the Iraq war?

That NYT has insulted this site? LOL

It doesn’t matter if Sinclair is lying or not, the real issues with Obama still stand.

Ayers, Auchi, Rezko, Pritzker, Palmer, Exelon, Daley, etc

Comment by Ms. Independent | 2008-06-19 02:51:31

Yeah, those issues haven’t really panned out either so if by “Stand” you mean are completeny tenuous, then I guess maybe there’s a problem. Me, I deal with facts.

Comment by Karma | 2008-06-19 03:09:23

Those issues haven’t panned out!? LOL

Thanks for letting me know, just what type of ‘facts’ you prefer.

 
 

Comment by Ms. Independent | 2008-06-19 02:57:40

By the way, not so much “insulted” as “exposed”

Comment by Karma | 2008-06-19 03:13:00

How exactly do you expose an October Surprise as a lie in May/June when they tape hasn’t been released? LOL

 
 

Comment by beebop | 2008-06-19 06:02:33

The former home of Judith Miller? PUHLEZE … Jayson Blair, anyone?

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 07:57:49

Ha ha ha ha. The NY Times should promote William “Always Wrong” Kristol to editor.

 
 
 

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-06-19 06:40:08

Obama lied about his neighbor Ayers, five billable hours to ‘that individual’ Rezko, never hearing a discouraging word from Rev. KKK Wright…

Do you see a pattern here? Larry S. isn’t running for president of the United States.

 

Comment by ultra | 2008-06-19 11:32:34

Not just the NYT. Even Michelle Malkin said that Larry Johnson is not to be trusted.

http://michellemalkin.com/2008/06/03/where-is-the-purported-michelle-obama-whitey-video/

 
 

Comment by alee21 | 2008-06-19 07:06:18

schtum-
Sounds like you may have a brain tumor, let’s see your medical records.

 
 

Comment by hillarylover | 2008-06-23 13:47:15

But sinclair failed the lie detector test and has a history of extortion.If you take this mans word for anything it says much more about you than it does about him!

 
 

Comment by NURSERATCHET | 2008-06-19 02:14:34

I THINK YOU BETTER READ/LISTEN TO THE STORY AGAIN. YOU HAVE TOO MUCH MIS-INFORMATION. THE LIMO DRIVE TOOK LARRY TO DOWNTOWN CHICAGO WHERE HE WAS INTRODUCED TO OBAMA BY THE DRIVE. OBAMA DID NOT GO TO GURNEY UNTIL THE NEXT DAY. THE DROVE TOGETHER IN THE LIMO TO PICK UP THE COCAINE AT OBAMA’S DIRECTION. AND WHY WOULD ANYONE GO THROUGH THE HELL AND DEATH THREATS AND PERSONAL SUFFERING FOR 9 MONTHS “FOR PUBLICITY”. GOOD GRIEF!

Comment by hillarylover | 2008-06-23 13:52:23

Why did so many people say the clintons were guilty of murder and drug dealing??Dont you remember the good old days of whitewater and the rose law firm??What is wrong with you people youl believe ANY disgusting rumor thrown into the wind?

 
 
 

Comment by Kneecap | 2008-06-19 01:56:17

“The Obama folks have gone crazy over the Sinclair allegations.” lol. Larry Johnson: being a morbidly obese, pathetic loser, so you don’t have to.

Comment by Perry Logan | 2008-06-19 06:09:34

Sounds like we stepped on a corn.

 

Comment by alee21 | 2008-06-19 07:07:11

Did someone kneecap you? Is that why you are whining away?

 
 

Comment by alexei | 2008-06-19 08:45:43

The Obama followers continue their cry for “the tape, the tape” and of course Larry has consistently stated that the tape would be out after the Dem convention. The Repubs know when to release their ammo and not “shoot their wad” too soon (or they would be facing Clinton).

Why did you Obama followers come out with that ridiculous explanation of Michelle saying “Why’d he” if there was no tape?

Comment by Why'd He | 2008-06-19 13:00:50

So what happens when there’s no tape after the convention? and still no tape in October?

Are you like one of those crazy End of the World folks who keeps coming up with excuses why the rapture hasn’t happened as you predicted a thousand times over?

 
 
 

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-18 22:22:07

Sorry……we sorta hijacked the other threads. :)

 

Comment by Tumby J | 2008-06-18 22:22:09

The arrest was related to Sinclair’s past criminal record:

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11164.html

Comment by NURSERATCHET | 2008-06-18 23:50:33

NO, SORRY WRONG. NOT RELATED TO COLORADO AT ALL.

Comment by schtum | 2008-06-19 01:05:41

IT’S IN ALL CAPS SO IT MUST BE TRUE!

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 07:59:14

Some people have eye trouble… ?

 
 
 
 

Comment by Medusa | 2008-06-18 22:25:29

It seems like a lot of information and disclosure from someone just making stuff up. He’s been hauled off to jail, so it doesn’t seem like he has much to gain from this story, if it is false.

One thing that jumps out at me is the lack of documents and information that BO has released, including his medical records. Why not?

I don’t know if the story has merit but it seems like it would be fairly easy to prove one way or the other if some neutral party would check it out.

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-18 22:27:07

ohhhhhhhhhhhh…….I never knew why you guys wanted his medical records. I see where you’re headed now.

Comment by beebop | 2008-06-19 06:09:16

First — you are using a jacked screen name.

Second — medical records from a candidate whose parents died young, who is a heavy smoker (formerly), and has bragged in a novel about drug use should be mandatory.

Third — anyone on the downlow not using condoms would be an ass …

Comment by TheViking | 2008-06-19 10:06:11

OMG — I pray to Jesus that Obama didn’t catch HIV from his illicit gay sex days — If he did, it was WHITEY trying to bring him down like Uncle Wright says!

 
 
 

Comment by Tumby J | 2008-06-18 22:29:49

Because the last thing you want to do responding to unsubstantiated rumors is give them traction by reacting to them.

Comment by Mel | 2008-06-18 22:38:46

Like Rev Wright and Nafta and Ayers….lol

Comment by Tumby J | 2008-06-18 22:46:03

Right…those are substantiated events, which lots of people could verify.

Who’s backing up Sinclair on this one? Considering he failed his lie detector test, I think the number of people currently stands at 0.

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-18 22:52:07

The Limo Driver….someone published the guys information on the other thread. He’s a cab driver now.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-18 23:40:51

apparently tumby gets together in a group when smoking crack and having paid man sex.

 
 

Comment by Leisa | 2008-06-18 23:42:03

Yes, the company that offered to give the lie detector test did just happen to have a vested interest in having him fail the test…. in the tune of $100,000.00…

I used to work for a security co and happen to know that these tests can be manipulated, just as polls and academic “studies” can be made to report what ever the researcher wants to report.

:/

 

Comment by John House | 2008-06-19 03:30:09

Let’s see:

Wright: When the bulk of us savvy bloggers were talking about Wright and pointing towards Hannity’s and Carlson’s exposés about Wright and Obama’s Church they did in 2007 in JANUARY AND FEBRUARY, you asshole Obamatrons called us rumormongers and mudslingers. FAST FORWARD TO MARCH 2008.

NAFTA: When the inklings of Goolsbee’s conversations came out, asshole obamatrons got scared. When the facts were being HASHED out, i.e., substantiated, you asshole Obamatrons called it smearing. Yet the final story is that Goolsbee DID tell the Canadians that Obama’s NAFTA talk was “just talk”.

Ayers: When Taylor Marsh brought up Ayers BEFORE Clinton did in the debates, you asshole Obamatrons pitched a fit about how it wasn’t relevant because Ayers is now a professor. As if you’d never heard of professors with BAD CHARACTERS. Someone setting off bombs and then saying that they didn’t do enough? Ought to be stripped of their teaching credentials. That is NO role model for young minds. Oh but hey, I’m sure if Tim McVeigh hadn’t been such a hick/had been an intellectual and had somehow gotten out of prison to earn a teaching degree, it would’ve been all right? Right?

You asshole Obamatrons are INSANE. It frightens me to think that I might’ve actually at one point been a “far left progressive”, if this is what it means to be a “progressive” today.

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 03:31:51

actually, u frighten me more.

Comment by NY still loves Hillary | 2008-06-19 07:09:17

Good! Be afraid. Be very afraid.

 
 

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 08:08:08

I was thinking of the Unabomber. He was quite intelligent but still very very crazy. Why couldn’t he teach at U of C? No rich, evil father.

 
 
 
 

Comment by HillaryDidWin | 2008-06-18 23:34:07

How do you know it’s a RUMOR..Have you or any media person ask OBAMA…NO…if it’s a lie..why has he not sued Larry Sinclair for Slander…This is why I believe Larry Sinclair…but you go back to repeating the yes we can cheer and maybe one day you will wake up from your coma state and have a mind of your own!

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 02:45:36

Oh, baby, stop hitting the Grade C bait these sub-Prime clowns dish up.

Make this your mantra, re: Obamabots

“Fuck ‘em, they’re trash.
Fuck ‘em, they’re trash.
Fuck ‘em, they’re trash.
Fuck ‘em, they’re trash.
Fuck ‘em, they’re trash.
Fuck ‘em, they’re trash.
Fuck ‘em, they’re trash.
Fuck ‘em, they’re trash.”

See? Wasn’t that simple?

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 03:33:07

wow, how original….

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 08:09:27

but not off base.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by HillaryDidWin | 2008-06-18 23:15:55

Why would two US marshals show up for a bench warrant from CO that was only limited to within 30 miles of the state with no order for extradition back to CO?? Such a small thing considering Larry Sinclair was in fact in contact with CO regarding the warrant and was taking care of the issue…so Why was he arrested…Ask Obama!!

From his website and from todays press conference this man has admitted every illegal thing he has ever done and has not hidden anything…This man must be telling the truth…Now..let Obama pony up!!

Comment by Whatever | 2008-06-18 23:33:01

Well, actually they were from NJ. If you want to believe Sinclair, that’s fine, just don’t believe it because you hate Obama.

Comment by HillaryDidWin | 2008-06-18 23:36:53

Well..I don’t hate Obama..Nice to meet you..Mr. Know it all!!

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 03:35:37

yeah, u really sound convincing…lol!!!!!!!!!!!

Can I have some that Hater-ade too?

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-06-19 09:30:23

I hate him and Obamabots.

 

Comment by TheViking | 2008-06-19 10:10:34

Hate is the New Common Sense I believe…

 
 
 
 

Comment by NURSERATCHET | 2008-06-18 23:54:52

THERE WAS NO COLORADO BENCH WARRANT.

Comment by Air heads are Everywhere! | 2008-09-17 00:52:19

If there was no bench warrant then he could not have been arrested by any authorities, yet the records indicate he was. Stop lying trailer trashhead!

 
 
 

Comment by rosered56 | 2008-06-19 01:03:02

If this story is true, there may be others like Larry Sinclair that shared drugs and had sex with Obama.
Surely Larry would not be the only one he was doing it with. Maybe others will now come forward with more proof on Obama’s addiction to causal sex and drugs. Who knows!

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 02:48:18

Limo hummers from guys and crack smoking?

Is Hope-a-Dope a freaking REPUBLICAN, or what?

Comment by Zee | 2008-06-19 11:33:50

Bingo. He hearts Reagan.

 
 

Comment by Air heads are Everywhere! | 2008-09-17 00:54:36

How do you know there weren’t others. One of his two Pakistanis best buds was a homosexual. Maybe in NYC he was living with other Gays. He won’t answer questions about his time there. What or who was he doing?