Here are some examples of your “rapier wit.” I understand that some are responses to others.

“Good to know you guys are keeping your focus on the important issues: finding as many scary black people as possible to associate Obama with! Eyes on the prize, and all that…”

“(stop me if I’m not writing with sufficient intelligence for you), and in fact (that’s in reality, I mean, not in your fantasy world) In your happy little delusion land, Obama is in trouble. ”

“You are living in a dream world. Seriously. You haven’t the faintest clue what you are talking about this year. ”

“Don’t wade into waters you do not understand, beebop.”

“But hey, you continue to delude yourselves that Obama is “toast,” “unelectable,” “cannot win.” You have a few more months to have fun with your cute little fringe hate site before you have to return to reality.”

“You PUMA people, honestly, are a fucking joke. Your numbers are utterly miniscule — not even a rounding error in national electoral calculus — the traffic numbers on your network of sites are not growing (yes, we are watching, just in case, and they aren’t; NQ peaked right when Larry was promising a whitey tape and dropped way back down after the tape failed to surface). The vast majority of HRC voters will wind up voting Democrat this fall, for the simple reason that, hello, they’re Democrats. Unlike you hate site clowns”

As to your effect on free speech, please consider that many of the people that post here were driven off Democrat blogs for nothing more than differing from a pro-Obama perspective. It is hardly surprising that they feel hostile to people that come in here using the same tactics that conquered their earlier homes. I have experienced it first hand. Analytic posts containing no ad hominem, racist, sexist, or homophobic commentary were removed because they did not agree with the Obama party line.

Furthermore, locales that offered refuge were then flooded with the now f(l)amed Obamabots, such as happened in this thread today from you, though your commentary is less insulting or extreme. This ties into my point about the assault on freedom of speech. By flooding/polluting refuge blogs, or getting them shut down, Obamabots inhibit freedom of association by crashing the party.

In this regard, Democratic sites were sanitized of discourse so they could provide Obamaesque meditative drones. Fine. We want our drones as well, but Obama supporters craving the rough and tumble discourse that their sites disallow feel the need to harass us.

Finally, we would both be foolish if we thought that the more egregious posts were not the work of black ops people employed/motivated by those that want to discredit this blog.

Yours,
Steven

Since, he has disposed of all his positions.

If they only knew….