RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Seriously, Is Obama Just a Puppet?

We first learned who was behind Obama and his inspiring speeches months ago. Those very speeches that excited the crowds, and drew people in. Those very speeches that many people voted for. Despite the fact that he ever really said anything more than just *hope* and *change*, people saw JFK, MLK and RFK all rolled into one. All because of his moving oratory, early on in the primary. But as I said, we learned who was responsible for those speeches.

Obama’s Speechwriter: A Baby Faced, 26-Year-Old White Guy 

So, Obama is really, really successful at reading a teleprompter, and delivering someone else’s words. A puppet, you might say. 

Then we learned that Obama was regurgitating words originally given by his friend Patrick Deval. Not once, but many times. 

And we not only learned about *borrowed* speeches but also borrowed phrases. 

“Sí Se Puede” or “yes we can” is from the United Farm Workers. 

 “Together we can” was the campaign slogan of Deval Patrick in 2006

“Fired Up! Ready to Go!” is from the NAACP in South Carolina, used by Jondelle Harris Johnson in the Civil Rights marches. 

“We are the ones we’ve been waiting for.” is a Hopi Indian saying, used by Alice Walker as the title of her book.

But now we learn that not only is Obama a puppet when it comes to giving speeches, but his foreign policy isn’t his either. I knew he had very little foreign policy experience, if any, but doesn’t he have to do anything?? A cast of 300 prepare him daily? Who are these people that are affecting our foreign policy? Shouldn’t they be running for office, or at least vetted, since they are doing all the work? 


A Cast of 300 Advises Obama on Foreign PolicyEvery day around 8 a.m., foreign policy aides at Senator Barack Obama’s Chicago campaign headquarters send him two e-mails: a briefing on major world developments over the previous 24 hours and a set of questions, accompanied by suggested answers, that the candidate is likely to be asked about international relations during the day.One recent Q. & A. asked, for example, whether Mr. Obama supported the decision by Iraq’s prime minister, Nuri Kamal al-Maliki, to include a timetable for American troop withdrawal in any new security agreements with the United States. The answer, provided to Mr. Obama with bullet points, was yes — or “a genuine opportunity,” as he put it in a speech on Iraq this week. Behind the e-mail messages is a tight-knit group of aides supported by a huge 300-person foreign policy campaign bureaucracy, organized like a mini State Department, to assist a candidate whose limited national security experience remains a concern to many voters.   

I do take some comfort in knowing that many are from the Clinton White House and from Hillary’s staff. (funny how Obama always wanted to distance himself from the politics of the past, and from the Clinton’s, but he always surrounds himself with people from the Clintons years.) 

I know all candidates, and all Presidents have advisors. I know they all have speech writers. But, if you take away Obama’s great speeches, and you take away his foreign policy advisors, what is left? Seriously. He has not accomplished anything. Nada. Zilch. And the LITTLE that he does do, now, (give speeches or comment on foreign policy) is totally scripted and provided by someone else. And when he speaks to groups like African Americans about taking responsibility, he is threatened with castration. And when he has taken a firm stance on an issue, he completely FLIPS and FLOPS on them - FISA, NAFTA, the surge in Iraq, campaign finance, guns, abortion… 

Well, I think we have a pretty good idea of what happens when Obama is left to his own devices. Here are some new ones: 

“Great” Moments in Presidential Speeches: Obama

Another Barack Obama Gaffe: A Civilian Army? (what is that all about??)

The Real Barack Obama, The Flip Flop Kid

The Obama Iraq Documentary: Whatever the Politics Demand

Barack Obama “Uh” Count 

And of course, the classics:

Obama VS. Robert Gibbs on the surge

Obama on Iran

 The Game of Expedience

Obama Just words - just speeches - just think

Obama on Lobbiest bill

Obama on the Race Card

Obama Claims He’s Visited 57 States

Obama on his dad and the flag?

Barack Obama Sees Dead People

Obama’s Memorial Day Gaffe

Obama in Sunrise 

Obama rally in Sioux Falls

Obama on Rezko

Obama Gets Afghanistan Language Wrong 

So, again I ask, is he just a puppet? A flip flopping, do nothing, know nothing, present voting, change jobs every two years, never having accomplished anything, hangs out with bigots, racists, and terrorists, gaffe machine, judgment lacking, slumlord buddy, vain, pandering puppet. 

What does he stand for, really? We thought he was very left. But now he is moving further and further to the right. We can’t look at his voting history, because it is very un-telling (130 present votes on tough issues- intentional, me thinks) We can’t look at his resume because it is very, very short - he has spent more time campaigning then serving in the Senate (146 days). And his state senate job was part time, meeting 55 days a year.  

Hell, we can’t even look at his birth certificate to know if he is who he says he is! We can’t even look to his books for information, because they are full of mistruths, and fictitious characters and situations.

I can’t figure out if he is super calculating and dangerous, or a puppet.  

But, who is controlling his strings? 

Published at American PUMA in Italy

 

 

 

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post194 Comments »

Comment by Paladin | 2008-07-21 08:11:38

C’mon, I know you are constantly hammering Obama about any and everything he does, how about SOME balance. Is there even one small thing good about this guy, his policies and his followers? Unless you find some balance, you (NoQuarter) will soon be viewed as irrevelant. Perhaps you already are.

Comment by roseeriter | 2008-07-21 08:18:15

Can’t find balance if there is none.

NOBAMA

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-07-21 08:53:35

Seriously! What IS IT about OBAMA lemmings that makes them TRY and FORCE you to say good things about their master otherwise they MUST insult you for your clear thinking with reasoned examples and links to prove it.

IT MAKES THEM START SHAKING UNCONTROLLABLY!

It’s a default reaction to their bad programming I’m afraid! NO ability to think outside their odd looking box. (their default reaction phrase, “you are a racist and/or bigot” for not ADORING their Master Clown!

WONDERFUL job Gal in Italy!!

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-21 09:06:35

I doubt the troll paladin even let his/her eyes even look at any of the videos or other proof of his master’s many flaws.

 

Comment by NObamaNoHow | 2008-07-21 10:37:17

It’s because they’ve invested so much of their own identity in their candidate and they can’t bear the thought that if he’s hollow that mightmake them hollow, too.

I feel sorry for them, but not sorry enough to ignore Obama’s obvious lies.

 
 

Comment by destardi | 2008-07-21 09:30:11

SaraInItaly!

Great post…full of information.

(From your favorite Destardi! :P)

Comment by sarainitaly | 2008-07-21 09:36:50

 
 
 

Comment by don tufts | 2008-07-21 08:18:33

as far as most people that belong to this coalition there is nothing good or redeeming about obama.if you think we are irrevelant then go back to pro barky sites.

 

Comment by Chicago Joe | 2008-07-21 08:19:59

Sorry, he has no accomplishments. His greatest accomplishments are a couple of books that are supposed to be fact but include a fair amount of fiction. He has coasted on his relationships. For a nobody from nowhere, he was able to exploit his relationships to include some of the most powerful people in Chicago. He gerrymandered his Illinois senate district to include some of the wealthiest areas of the city so he could exploit the lakefront liberals. Oh, that’s it! He is a world class, calculating manipulator who uses people and relationships for personal gain. Cuz he hasn’t done much for the people. He had done what he can for HIS people.

The American people are in serious jeopardy of having the worst judgment on earth…two Bush terms and then this figment of his own imagination?

It is making me sick to watch any press coverage on this Iraq trip as he “pretends” that he actually is someone these people need to meet.

Comment by N. Lee | 2008-07-21 08:39:39

Actually he has some accomplishments. He accomplished to line the pockets of his buddies in Chicago and displace thousands of low income AAs in his Chicago district. He accomplished a selected nomination from the DNC and he has accomplished to hoodwink every kool-aid drinker in his support group.

Comment by NOBama in August | 2008-07-21 09:02:17

He also accomplished destroying the DNC and creating a great amount of dis-unity in what a few months?

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-21 09:09:24

The Democratic Party is about 183 years old…Obama destroyed it in about 6 months, I guess you can call that an accomplishment.

Comment by sarainitaly | 2008-07-21 09:24:11

if that wasn’t so sad, and true, it would be really funny. ;O)

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by katmandu | 2008-07-21 08:23:03

Okay, I’ll bite. Good things about Obama (from someone who will not vote for him):

1. On the surface, many of his stands are progressive. (We just don’t know what he really believes.)
2. He did overcome a horrible upbringing and made something of himself.
3. Has has, on some occasions, spoken unpleasant truths before hostile audiences (like speaking about black churches’ homophobia).

But there’s too much of a void for me to trust in, and he appears super expedient.

Comment by pm317 | 2008-07-21 08:33:37

Horrible upbringing? I am not sure. How many can say that their mother stuck with the unwanted pregnancy and raised the kid and grandparents who gave him a nice home and education? He seems to have thrown that side of his family under the bus in his quest for adopting an abandoned father’s heritage for his own political expediency.

Comment by educatedwhitewoman | 2008-07-21 08:41:55

Are you kidding? His Indonesian stepfather was an oil executive. He went to the nicest prep school in Hawaii while living with grandma & grandpa. His grandmother, who raised him from 10 years of age, was a bank VP. Affirmative action helped land him stints at an Ivy League college and eventually a stint as Harvard Law Review editor, the first candidate to receive that job, NOT on merit, i.e. grades, but because of his minority status; as editor, he never wrote one article for the review, a first! After his tenure, they even changed the rules, requiring that the editor write an article.

 
 

Comment by olivia1998 | 2008-07-21 08:35:24

His background was rich and luxurious. Filled with private schools and all the trimmings. He was spoiled rotten by his Grandmother. There is no record of student loans, food stamps or scholarships in Obama’s name. His Grandmother paid for everything just like Bushie
You have been bamboozled just like you are with his magic fantasy tour.

Comment by katmandu | 2008-07-21 09:03:27

But material comforts are only part of the story. His father sounds like he was a nutjob (though Barack had almost no relationship with him –)… http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-431908/A-drunk-bigot–US-Presidental-hopeful-HASNT-said-father-.html

And if he was so happy with his mom, as he alleges, why this?

“And when Mr. Obama asked to stay in Hawaii for high school rather than return to Asia, she accepted living apart — a decision her daughter says was one of the hardest in Ms. Soetoro’s life.” http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/14/us/politics/14obama.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

I grew up in somewhat humble surroundings, but I’d take a conventional small town upbringing over his global wanderings.

I wish you had read my many postings on this site against Obama. There must be hundreds of them. I have not been bamboozled, and as I stated many times I will not vote for him.

Comment by NOBama in August | 2008-07-21 09:08:35

He has had it better than most people on this board.

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-21 09:19:48

You are a kind hearted person katmandu, that is why you empathsize with Obama’s childhood. The sad thing is I don’t think Obama is capable of returning the favor. That being said, you’re right, he’s had some tough things in his childhood, but if you look in the biographies of millions of other people you will find hardships. Some succumb to these hardships, some overcome and do great things, and others, like Obama wear these on their sleeve and use their victim status as a tool to manipulate people and the system for their own gain.

Comment by sarainitaly | 2008-07-21 10:18:13

I don’t even believe his descriptions of his childhood from his books.

I have read many accounts online from his childhood friends, and co-workers, and family members who contradict his recollections, all the time.

I think he tried to create his story, and make it more dramatic and difficult than it really was.

The media constantly says he was raised by a single mother, living on welfare or food stamps.

His grandparents raised him, while he attended private schools, and she went to university. He had friends, and skipped school to party and screw off. His friends always describe their lives ad normal.

 
 
 
 

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-07-21 10:44:41

He sure was a fat little kid. Looks like he ate well.

 
 

Comment by NOBama in August | 2008-07-21 08:54:07

Don’t fall for this plea of being fair to Obama, when all the pro-obama sites were absolutely hateful towards Hillary.

 
 

Comment by Betty | 2008-07-21 08:31:25

Comment by Donna Brazile | 2008-07-21 08:34:13

He can almost dunk a basketball!

Boohay!

 
 

Comment by Obama is a bum | 2008-07-21 08:35:07

There is nothing positive about Obama and if you don’t like it — tough.

I am willing to donate to Obama if he wants to purchase some land in Guyana and move there with his zombie followers. Let history repeat itself.

 

Comment by wodiej | 2008-07-21 08:35:47

Oh, I know a big good thing about him…his ABSENCE.

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-07-21 10:57:00

HA!! I agree with THAT!

 
 

Comment by Emma | 2008-07-21 08:48:37

Maybe besides his charisma and oratory powers there is nothing outstanding about him in terms of his qaulifications to be president.

This site is not irrelevant. It is part of what healthy democracy is. People have the right to question.

If you can think of anything that unequivically qualifies Obama for the presdencey or is “good” about him why not post it and answer your own question?

Comment by NOBama in August | 2008-07-21 09:13:12

Maybe besides his charisma and oratory powers there is nothing outstanding about him in terms of his qaulifications to be president.

I can’t even give him that. He was boring before Oprah told us he wasn’t.

 
 

Comment by NOBama in August | 2008-07-21 08:52:46

How many pro-obama sites said good things about Hillary? (of which there are many)

 

Comment by Mirlo | 2008-07-21 08:58:46

Hey, Sara, good article and thanks for all the links.

Funny, lately there are a lot of trolls writing the first comments, to preemptively disrupt a comprehensive discussion.

Things must be getting quite hot, judging the strong reappearance of probama trolls. Makes me feel confident, folks.

 

Comment by Uppity Woman | 2008-07-21 09:13:21

We will know we are irrelevant when characters like you stop showing up.

I know the answer to what Barack Obama stands for!!! Pick me! Pick Me!!!

He stands for Hopey-Changey!

Comment by sarainitaly | 2008-07-21 10:13:21

And he even stole the *change* thing from Hillary.

She used *Ready for Change - Ready to Lead* and he ripped it off, and created *change you can believe in*

He was ripping her off, and calling her unbelievable (a liar) from the very beginning….

 
 

Comment by Joe | 2008-07-21 09:24:11

You just demonstrated the truth of P.T. Barnum’s old saying, “There’s a sucker born every minute.” Clearly, there was a bumper crop of suckers when you were born.

 

Comment by destardi | 2008-07-21 09:27:56

Can you say ONE good thing about bush?

I can’t.

obama=bush.

I was right about bush, I’m right about obama.

How’s that for the real deal?

Comment by Chicago Joe | 2008-07-21 09:38:29

I was right about Bush, too. I couldn’t believe that he could possibly have a chance at being the nominee, just as I felt about Obama. But the American people pay so little attention to actual facts that the Madison Ave. Michigan Av.campaign for Obama had been perfectly pitched for them. They are only watching the “commercial messages,” courtesy of our lax and shameful corporate stooges in the MSM.

Tragic.

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-07-21 10:52:45

My friends were so convinced Al Gore would win, and I jut ignored that whole election. I wouldn’t say anything when anyone talked about politics, and they would finally ask me point blank, “Do you think Bush will win?”

I just said, “Yes.” And everyone would get all excited and outraged, then they’d challenge me and ask why. I’d say, “I don’t care for either of them. I prefer Gore, because I voted for Clinton.” Everyone gushed and agreed. I continued, “Because they’re stupid. In the end, people vote on very simple things like, “Because his dad was the President, and he’s been groomed for the job.”

 
 

Comment by sarainitaly | 2008-07-21 09:39:14

I feel the same way! I knew where Bush would take us.

I remember telling people back when it was Gore v bush that Bush reminded me of the Martin Sheen character in Dead Zone. I couldn’t believe people couldn’t see him for what/who he was/is.

Same goes for Obama.

 
 

Comment by CJ | 2008-07-21 09:35:57

The only good thing about Obama is that speech he made in 2004 saying he was not qualified to be President!

 

Comment by britgirls | 2008-07-21 09:44:29

Oh, please educate us on “one little thing” he’s done. Seriously, I really would like to hear about it. I’ve asked Obama supporters again and again why are they supporting him. The only response I got was the e-mail debunking the claim that he’s a muslim.

I don’t give a shit whether he’s a muslim or not (I’m an atheist myself). His close 20-year relationship with Rev Wright DOES bother me.

C’mon, tell why you’re supporting him. Tell us HIS merits.

 

Comment by tzada | 2008-07-21 10:10:53

An empty suit has no substance, and hey what can you say about this suit?
1) too thin
2) too girlie
3) stammers, stutters without a telepromter
4) takes credit for others work
5) whines
6) race baits
7) phrases things in a childish way
8) lies, then cannot keep his lies straight
9) poses throwing his nose in the air
10) wears purple/blue lipstick or is related to Arafat?
There is more, much more but I will leave it for now.
Even the laundry cannot help this empty suit, it’s too dirty for Goodwill. At the rag factory this white woman once worked at, all cheap suits went into what was called shoddy…
Please don’t call me racist. I once voted for Obama in the Florida primary, but hey my vote doesn’t matter. Obama conned me once but NO OBAMA EVER! The shoddy pile is in the bin, yeah that one right next to the trash.

 

Comment by C.S. | 2008-07-21 10:44:52

Well, uhhh, he’s good to his…uhhh, white grandmother, uhhh, no, he..uhhh… called her a racist… wait, I’ve got it! He, uhhh, let’s Michelle say anything she wants even when it…uhhh…damages his campaign…uhhh, “presidency”.

 

Comment by Tricia Spiegel | 2008-07-21 11:17:17

Balance.

I think he is nice-looking.
I think he reads a great speech from a teleprompter.
He was smart enought to get a law degree.

That’s about it.

 

Comment by TeaMug | 2008-07-21 11:25:26

whats the bet it is one of Tylor Marsh’s drones.

NoObama

 

Comment by timepassages | 2008-07-21 12:19:07

 

Comment by Undercover Black Man | 2008-07-21 12:46:28

Find some balance? Dude… this is why it’s called “the politics of personal destruction.” They must hammer Obama on everything (even when it makes them look stupid… as in attacking him for using speechwriters!) They must mock his name. They must insult his wife. They must spread the “whitey” tape and Larry Sinclair lies.

They are character assassins. It’s what they do.

Comment by mr. natural | 2008-07-21 13:33:36

Tell ya what, undercover…

If Obama had taken the FISA vote to stand tall for America’s Constitution the way Nelson Mandela stuck up for human rights in his earth-moving “This is a cause for which I am prepared to sacrifice my life, if needs be.” speech, Obama would have earned my respect.

Instead, Obama has earned nothing.

 
 
 

Comment by Katmoon | 2008-07-21 08:12:30

Strings and all, looks like they are set in advance to do what they want to: Must be nice to be so sure in advance.

Primetime Convention activities Monday, August 25 through Wednesday, August 27 will continue to be held at the Pepsi Center. The final day of the Convention on Thursday, August 28, including the nomination acceptance speech of Senator Barack Obama, will be held at INVESCO Field at Mile High, also located in downtown Denver. Daytime Convention events, including meetings of the Democratic caucuses and councils will continue to be held at the Colorado Convention Center

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-07-21 11:02:10

it’s THIS kind of dereliction of duty from the DNC that sent my MOM over the edge to change her PARTY after SIXTY FIVE freeeeeakin YEARS HOWIE!!!

DO YOU UNDERSTAND HOW HUGE THAT IS???

MUCH MORE HUGE THAN ANY MINORITY FLAG RAISING PARTY!

TRUST ME!

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-07-21 11:08:01

My MOM btw is no bitter ignorant hick!

She is from INDIANA
Born on a farm w/6 brothers and sisters
Was a Deputy in Crown Point for 10 yrs
Quit work to raise 2 kids
When we moved to FLA & when I was ready for 1st grade she went BACK to work for the local school system (since she had a degree anyway) and ended up retiring from there 20 plus years later, now retired and widowed and FEELS TOTALLY BETRAYED by the party.

Nice going DNC

 
 
 

Comment by PS | 2008-07-21 08:13:37

13 minute video about BO….long, but informative

Comment by TeaMug | 2008-07-21 11:28:24

where? link please

 
 

Comment by pm317 | 2008-07-21 08:14:09

Good post. Scary, isn’t it? In fact in a debate he said he was not an operational (details oriented) guy (read another Bush)and he will hire advisers. So it takes 300 advisers, it looks like to get him ready everyday. Who are they? Are people voting for HIS judgment and integrity or his army of advisers’? 300? I would laugh if it was not serious, scary and definitely sad (for America).

 

Comment by PS | 2008-07-21 08:16:07

Comment by TeaMug | 2008-07-21 11:30:10

oh, I posted this video somewhere on another thread. Interesting, scary

 
 

Comment by roseeriter | 2008-07-21 08:16:59

Some of his backers: Zbigniew Brzezinski (he seems to have a vendetta against Russia) and his son Mark;Susan Rice, Richard Clarke,the Rockefellers, Dennis Ross;Soros, Gene Sharp;Goolsbee and Howard Dean- to mention a few.

Google them. Basically they are the equivalent of the right wing neocons. Most of the above are wall street protectors among war-mongers. Research the Trilateral Commission and Brindenberg (sp?) group.

Obama is most definitely a puppet on many strings.

Comment by K. Wynne | 2008-07-21 08:23:45

roseriter,

That’s “Bilderberg” group. And you are absolutely correct about his backers. They are the flip side of neo-cons and the BO supporters are acting exactly like the bush supporters did when we tried to warn them against supporting him!

Deja vu all over again.

 

Comment by hank48188 | 2008-07-21 08:54:25

These people are the Internationalists, when you see Ziggy Brzezinski and George Soros you know the deal, it’s Jimmy Carter Lite, at least Jimmy had done something in his life, Obama has spent his entire life promoting himself, this is his 6th election in 12 years. He knows how to seek out people that can help him, that’s all that matters. He sucked up to Bill Ayers and got positions on the Board of the Woods Fund and the Chairmanship of the ANNENBERG CHALLENGE GRANT. I think Obama is a person damaged by his abandonment by both his Father and Mother and it made him a “people pleaser”, unable to take a stand on anything because it won’t please everyone, he likes to be all things to all people.

Comment by wodiej | 2008-07-21 09:02:04

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-21 10:17:01

Sorry, I hate to disagree. He’s not a pleaser, he’s a user.

 
 

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-07-21 10:56:43

Zbig and Soros were behind Kerry, too. Johnson and Nye were behind Edwards. They pop up every few years, pushing a new candidate. It’s always a doozie, too.

 
 

Comment by Deke | 2008-07-21 09:10:20

The Brzezinski Group is also advising the McCain campaign so don’t expect much difference in foreign policy. That is another example of the entire political process being out of the hands of the voter. Special interests will be represented no matter who is elected. McCain has at least shown some independence in the past. Today’s NYT has a front page article about that.

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-07-21 11:10:15

He has Mark Brzezinski, but I don’t know who else. These creeps will always find their way behind the scenes, and any President will find a lot of people whispering in his ear. Sometimes several people at once. Obama does not stand up well under pressure. He does not like being criticized. I could see him getting real bitter and withdrawing from all decision-making, consoling himself with all the goodies he can pilfer for himself and his adoring throngs (lots of parties and maybe a basketball court!) McCain on the other hand is known for showing a bit of independent thinking. He is experienced and has first hand knowledge of how our military works while we’re in two wars. It’s an open and shut argument. If we had preferred a happy balance between the two, we could have chosen Hillary, but nooooo…

 
 

Comment by Uppity Woman | 2008-07-21 09:16:06

Zbig. the guy who helped make sure the Taliban stayed right where they are. We ought to dress him up in a buhrqa and ship him over there with is ankles showing and see how well that works out for him.

Zbig. The guy who told Jihadists, “God is on your side”.

zbig. The guy who took photo ops with Osama Bin Laden, “Freedom Fighter”.

We know what zbig likes. I guess Obama likes what zbig likes since he admires his advise so much.

Comment by Anee | 2008-07-21 10:17:38

Zbig, father of the loon daughter on MSNBC with Morning Joe, she led the pitchfork mob that went after Hillary any chance they could. They make me puke.

 
 

Comment by tzada | 2008-07-21 10:17:52

add jimmy carter, george soros

 
 

Comment by jus messin wit you man | 2008-07-21 08:20:46

Obama’s rise to the top? Shit floats. Nuff said.

 

Comment by candymarl | 2008-07-21 08:23:21

Who knows who or what this guy is. He won’t tell us and the media don’t care to ask.

How many advisers does it take to teach Obama foreign policy?

No one knows that either.

 

Comment by antifish | 2008-07-21 08:23:29

I agree that Obama is a puppet. The similarities between him and George W. Bush are frightening. Clearly, Axelrod is Obama’s Rove and the one actually putting on the show.

As for who is pulling the strings, we need only look at those instrumental in selecting him in defiance of the majority will. That would be Dean (strong-arming the Rules and Bylaws Committee and non-elected superdelegates), Pelosi and Reid (strong-arming the elected superdelegates) and Kennedy and Kerry (providing access to their massive fund-raising networks). I shudder to think where they would take this country with the unfettered power of controlling their personal marionette in the White House.

Comment by K. Wynne | 2008-07-21 08:59:11

Do you think it’s a coincidence that Pelosi is also in Soros’ pocket? That’s why she did not stick up for Hillary nor did she lift a finger to push the DNC to defend her, as they did for BO.

This is an orchestrated coup to take over from the inside.

Comment by hank48188 | 2008-07-21 09:08:13

For quite a few years Soros had been the DEMS biggest Money Man, and money does talk. I think he’s the biggest backer of MoveOn and I’m sure he funds other groups as well that fit HIS AGENDA

Comment by dnesser | 2008-07-21 11:51:52

BINGO! It’s George Soros. The Main Sponsor of MOVEON and the DailyKos. I wish someone would check out all those “small” donations to see where they are coming from. We know Rezko and Auchi found ways to put Money into Obama’s Senate Race, and I’m sure Soros is putting more in than known.

 
 
 
 

Comment by glennmcgahhee | 2008-07-21 08:24:20

I heard it explained yesterday on CNN to my surprise. The Invesko Field acceptance speech is happening because they are afraid. Very afraid of Hillary’s supporters who will count for half the people occupying the Pepsi Center. They wouldn’t want there to be any opposing views so they hope to drown out those calling his nomination the fraud that it has become.