The 2008 Weblog Awards
Vote for NoQuarter, finalists for "Best Political Coverage"!
You can vote every day.
No registration required!


RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

“Obama Love”

ARLINGTON, VA — U.S. Senator John McCain’s presidential campaign today released its latest web video entitled “Obama Love.” The video highlights the media’s love affair with Barack Obama — or as MSNBC’s Chris Matthews says, that “thrill going up my leg.”

CAVEAT: No Quarter does NOT endorse Sen. McCain. But, do I ever agree with this video’s depiction of the media treatment of Obama.

McCain’s campaign invites you to “Vote For Your Favorite Love Song For “Obama Love.”

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post151 Comments »

Comment by Can't stand Obama crybabies. | 2008-07-22 15:34:03

Marvelous video!

Comment by TeaMug | 2008-07-22 15:36:45

I watched this video earlier, I laughed then as I do now, after watching it again!!

Spread this video about!!

Comment by Can't stand Obama crybabies. | 2008-07-22 15:43:29

Gosh, and this is only the beginning!

Comment by roseeriter | 2008-07-22 16:17:12

Gag me with a spoon! What is that matthew man’s love for Obama???

I do not understand that kind of idolotry of anyone. Just don’t get it and I sure don’t feel it.

NOBAMA!

Comment by Can't stand Obama crybabies. | 2008-07-22 17:44:51

Yes, you saw it with your own eyes…chrislove.
The type of love that makes you want to hurl chunks.

 

Comment by mahaska | 2008-07-22 17:53:50

He had the hots for bush too. No wonder he can’t keep a woman.

 
 
 

Comment by Lezident | 2008-07-22 19:30:22

honestly the mccain campaign and the GOP groups are doing a better job with the anti-obama videos than the PUMAs and Dem groups are. their videos are just crafted better. the one dem set of videos that are pretty good is the “tell obama he can keep the change” campaign.

 
 

Comment by tish | 2008-07-22 16:15:06

MORE WONDERFUL DEMONS I MEAN DEMS,,,ARE THEY ALL ADULTERS?
SEN. JOHN EDWARDS CAUGHT WITH MISTRESS AND LOVE CHILD!
Vice Presidential candidate Sen. John Edwards was caught visiting his mistress and secret love child at 2:40 this morning in a Los Angeles hotel by the NATIONAL ENQUIRER.

The married ex-senator from North Carolina - whose wife Elizabeth continues to battle cancer — met with his mistress, blonde divorcee Rielle Hunter, at the Beverly Hilton on Monday night July 21 - and the NATIONAL ENQUIRER was there! He didn’t leave until early the next morning.

Rielle had driven to Los Angeles from Santa Barbara with a male friend for the rendezvous with Edwards. The former senator attended a press event Monday afternoon with L.A. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa on the topic of how to combat homelessness.

But a months-long NATIONAL ENQUIRER investigation had yielded information that Rielle and Edwards, 54, had arranged to secretly meet afterward and for the ex-senator to spend some time with both his mistress and the love child who he refuses to publicly acknowledge as his own.

The NATIONAL ENQUIRER broke the story of Edwards’ love child scandal last year, when Rielle was still pregnant and Edwards was still considered a strong candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination.
Both parties denied the NATIONAL ENQUIRER report and a close friend of Edwards’ came forward and said he was the father of Rielle’s baby. But sources told the NATIONAL ENQUIRER a far different story - they revealed that Edwards was engineering a massive cover up of his shocking infidelity.

Sources came forward after that story appeared and told The NATIONAL ENQUIRER that Edwards and Rielle had met secretly several times, so that he could see his baby and continue his relationship with Rielle.
The NATIONAL ENQUIRER learned that one such meeting was set for yesterday and observed the secret meeting.
At 9:45 p.m. (PST) Monday Edwards appeared at the hotel, and was dropped off at a side entrance. NATIONAL ENQUIRER reporter Alan Butterfield witnessed the ex-senator get out of a BMW driven by a male companion and stroll into the hotel.
Said Butterfield: “Edwards was not carrying anything. He walked in alone. He was wearing a blue dress shirt with the sleeves rolled up. He was looking around nervously before he entered the hotel.

“Once inside, he interestingly bypassed the lobby and ducked down a side stairs to go to the bottom floor to catch the elevator up - rather than taking the elevator in the main lobby. He went out of his way not to be seen.”
Meanwhile, Reille had reserved rooms 246 and 252 under the name of the friend who had accompanied her from Santa Barbara, Bob McGovern. Reille was in one room and McGovern was in another with her baby. This allowed her and Edwards to spend time alone, a source revealed.

Edwards went out of the hotel briefly with Reille, was observed by the NATIONAL ENQUIRER and then went back to her room, where he stayed until attempting to sneak out of the hotel unseen at 2:40 a.m. (PST). But when he emerged alone from an elevator into the hotel basement he was greeted by several reporters from the NATIONAL ENQUIRER.

Senior NATIONAL ENQUIRER Reporter Alexander Hitchen asked Edwards why he was visiting Rielle and whether he was ready to confirm that he was the father of her baby.
Shocked to see a reporter, and without saying anything, Edwards ran up the stairs leading from the hotel basement to the lobby. But, spotting a photographer, he doubled back into the basement. As he emerged from the stairwell, reporter Butterfield asked questioned him about his hookup with Reille.

Edwards did not answer and then ran into a nearby restroom. He stayed inside for about 15 minutes, refusing to answer questions from the NATIONAL ENQUIRER about what he was doing in the hotel. A group of hotel security men eventually escorted him from the men’s room, while preventing the NATIONAL ENQUIRER reporters from following him out of the hotel.

Said reporter Hitchen: “After we confronted him about seeing Rielle, Edwards looked like a deer caught in headlights!

“He was clearly surprised that we had caught him at this very late hour inside the hotel.

\ “Some guests up at this late hour watched the spectacle in amusement from a staircase nearby.”

Meanwhile, Rielle’s friend McGovern also refused to answer any questions from the NATIONAL ENQUIRER or offer any explanation for her meeting with Edwards.
The Edwards “love child” scandal drew international press attention after the NATIONAL ENQUIRER published a blockbuster investigation about the politician in our Dec. 31, 2007 print edition.
We reported that Rielle, a woman linked to Edwards in a cheating scandal earlier last year, was more than six months pregnant - and we reported that she told a close confidante that Edwards was the father of her baby!
Edwards denied the affair and that he was the father, and in a bizarre twist, a close friend of his, Alexander Young, said he was the father. Young, 41, was married at the time with three children. The NATIONAL ENQUIRER has learned he still is married.
Sources told the NATIONAL ENQUIRER exclusively that Edwards had engineered a massive cover up of the affair and love child scandal and that Young was taking the blame for his good friend. At the time Rielle had been relocated from the New York area to Chapel Hill in Edwards’ home state of North Carolina, where she was living in an upscale gated community down the street from Young. Strangely, Young even had Rielle to his house for dinner with his wife and kids, the NATIONAL ENQUIRER has learned.

Young has been extremely close to Edwards for years and was a key official in his presidential campaign.

Rielle is a self-described filmmaker whose company was hired by a pro-Edwards group called One America Committee. She was paid $114,000 to produce videos for Edwards’ campaign and worked with him on those videos.
Reporters from other media outlets asked Edwards about The NATIONAL ENQUIRER report during a campaign stop in Columbia, S.C.
Edwards responded: “The story is false. It’s completely untrue, ridiculous,” adding: “Anyone who knows me knows that I have been in love with the same woman for 30-plus years.”
Rielle issued her own statement, saying in part: “The innuendos and lies that have appeared on the Internet and in the NATIONAL ENQUIRER concerning John Edwards are not true, completely unfounded and ridiculous.”
But a source told the NATIONAL ENQUIRER: “Now that it seems to have blown wide open, Rielle may get her wish - all she wants is for John to marry her and for them to live happily ever after with their baby. She’s tired of running and living a lie.”

A representative for Reille had no comment on last night’s meeting with Edwards

Comment by roseeriter | 2008-07-22 16:20:50

I knew that’s why Edwards dropped out. And if anyone payed attention to his drop out speech in New Orleans where Elizabeth and Kate stood behind him and Elizabeth would not look at her husband.
I knew it.

Comment by d2d | 2008-07-22 16:37:30

he always gave me the eebie jeebies. never took to him like so many other ds in my state.

but this, now this is funny. sneaking up a stair well and then hiding in the men’s restroom. all the while guests from the hotel sat in the stair well witnessing the spectacle.

he’s finished with thank goodness!

maybe now Elizabeth can be true to herself and endorse Hillary’s nomination at the convention. now that would be sweet! nothing like a woman scorned; especially in such a public way.

Comment by NoBigotry | 2008-07-22 16:41:55

I think I will wait for a better source than the itchy tish and the National Enquirer. Especially as the NE has taken down its article.

How low do you lot go especially given this is a site of Hillary and McBush lovers?

Comment by JoseyJ | 2008-07-22 17:12:32

 

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-07-22 17:57:37

Who cares about the Breck Boy, anyway? He’s as much of a joke as Obambi.

Comment by standard | 2008-07-22 19:34:27

Elizabeth is so far superior that idiot.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by fif | 2008-07-22 17:29:34

Well if it’s the NATIONAL ENQUIRER THEN IT MUST BE TRUE! God, Trish, that’s really scraping the bottom of the barrel.

 
 

Comment by SirScud | 2008-07-22 16:46:33

 
 

Comment by NObamaNoHow | 2008-07-22 15:35:48

Pardon me while I throw up my waffle.

Comment by tzada | 2008-07-22 16:06:46

oh yea I agree….my stomach hurts and I feel like vomiting. Here is another one called connect the dots

http://www.eyeblast.tv/Public/Video.aspx?rsrcID=2036

 
 

Comment by kp | 2008-07-22 15:35:54

Way to go McCain campaign! Show the world just how silly the msm has been for this man.

 

Comment by katmandu | 2008-07-22 15:38:37

Ana Marie Cox, the original Wonkette, is no Obama fan. Writing over at Time now, after laying out Obama’s double talk on the surge, she had an incisive comment:

http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2008/07/obama_explains_it_all.html

[this is the quote she was commenting on]

“Here is what I will say,” Obama said, “I think that, I did not anticipate, and I think that this is a fair characterization, the convergence of not only the surge but the Sunni awakening in which a whole host of Sunni tribal leaders decided that they had had enough with Al Qaeda, in the Shii’a community the militias standing down to some degrees. So what you had is a combination of political factors inside of Iraq that then came right at the same time as terrific work by our troops. Had those political factors not occurred, I think that my assessment would have been correct.”

[snip]

“Well, you were saying that it would not make a significant dent in the violence,” Moran said.

“In the violence in Iraq overall, right,” Obama acknowledged. “So the point that I was making at the time was that the political dynamic was the driving force between that sectarian violence. And we could try to keep a lid on it, but if these underlining dynamic continued to bubble up and explode the way they were, then we would be in a difficult situation. I am glad that in fact those political dynamic shifted at the same time that our troops did outstanding work.”

Ms. Cox’s response:

So… it’s not that the surge was successful, it’s just that violence decreased and the political dynamic became more manageable. Sure.

Of course, what the relative success of the surge (or whatever) really means is that Obama won’t have to talk about Iraq pretty much ever again. McCain has often said he’d rather “lose an election than lose a war,” but I don’t think he thought he’d be on the winning side of a war and lose the election anyway.

Comment by Martin | 2008-07-22 16:19:25

Ms. Cox is still, like so many Obama neophytes, still speaking out of the side of her mouth when “critical” of the Anointed One!

Can’t they just admit Obama was wholey WRONG on the surge, refuses to agmit it, and now is headed for DISTASTROUS LOSS in November???

The “audacity of hope” for this charlatan’s election is just becoming plain ol’ audacity…and America is just getting more sick of it day by day!

 

Comment by Kate | 2008-07-22 16:23:58

Obama sure has backhanded it to our troops. The sheer arrgogance to not only suggest but assert that our brave and determined guys had little or nothing to do with the success that is now Iraq. Oh I know, we are not supposed to call it a success just yet but c’mon, our guys have pulled it off. BECAUSE of the tenacity and bravery of our guys the rest of the country has calmed down. It would not have happened by itself as Obama would have it. This insult to our guys is just way over the top. He’ll say anything, insult the country, appease every Eurofool on the continent but he goes way too far when he says that our guys were just standing by while “political forces ” changed the war. What the hell does he think drove those political forces…one of his sickening speeches??? NO NO It was our hardworking resilliant,smart,courageous guys on the ground walking the streets putting themselves at risk again and again and doing everything they can to keep the peace and security for everyone. The political sitiuation has changed ONLY because they were there.
The truth is that the far left is the only group left that will unquestioningly follow Obama. He has lost so many of us and now has to play it all up for the far left and the DNC. That bunch never did anything BUT insult our troops. Hillary would NEVER have insulted our troops. She would support them to the hilt and still have them out of there with honor at the first opportunity. Why? Because everybody on the ground in the entire Middle-East would know that in the first place she is nobody’s fool,she actually knows what she is talking about, she means what she says and has the toughness needed to see it all through. Hillary 2012

Comment by Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy | 2008-07-22 17:20:02

Kate, you are ABSOLUTELY right - Hillary has been fighting for our troops, and our veterans, not dissing them…

The video is great, though it kinda made me want to throw up - EWWWWW!!! I just don’t get it, I really don’t…

 
 

Comment by mahaska | 2008-07-22 17:56:11

he has a point, all right. It’s next to the hole in his head.

 
 

Comment by vera possumus | 2008-07-22 15:39:04

I so can’t wait for the backlash this November.

 

Comment by Jackson Pearson | 2008-07-22 15:39:09

“Obama Love” = Pathetic HOPENOSIS

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-07-22 16:12:35

 
 

Comment by fred | 2008-07-22 15:40:10

Heard Obama like rap, can someone makes me a rap called That Bitch Obama got 99 problems and the PUMA’s are 1

 

Comment by NoBigotry | 2008-07-22 15:40:32

CAVEAT: No Quarter does NOT endorse Sen. McCain.

* Not a single argument in favor of Hillary since she started backing Obama.
* Not a single attack on the McWar flip flops on every issue - but continued attacks on Obama.
* Everyday a rehashed talking point about “Obama the Muslim”

All of this from a self declared Republican previously employed by the CIA.

I guess you are being clever by not endorsing McBush, he needs you like he needs the endorsement of Haggee or Bush.

Comment by TeaMug | 2008-07-22 15:43:32

Oh, shut the fuck up!! you are sounding like an old record, on and on and on….

Hillary for President

Comment by NoBigotry | 2008-07-22 15:52:42

Comment by TeaMug | 2008-07-22 15:43:32

Oh, shut the fuck up!! you are sounding like an old record, on and on and on….

Hillary for President

Et Tu.

Hillary for President - she is no longer running, so maybe in 2016.

So what are the Rethugs attacking Obama for?

1. People want to vote FOR him and not against him.
2. He is a very powerful, convincing speechmaker.
3. Fellow World Leaders respect him.
4. Our “enemies” think they may be able to work with him.
5. FAUX news currently hates him.

Comment by Stalin | 2008-07-22 15:59:38

 

Comment by Lou | 2008-07-22 16:12:21

No one has the REQUIRED PLEDGED DELEGATES to win the nomination. They have to vote at the convention for the nominee.
Obama is not the nominee.
The news just says so but they lie.
Hillary suspended not ended.
She was FORCED BY POOPOSI and Rangel to go out and speak about unity.
It works both ways.
SUPRISE!
MAKE A MENTAL NOTE OF THIS POST!!!!

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-07-22 16:14:27

I’d tell him to take a mental note, but I see he’s out of paper.

Comment by meileen | 2008-07-22 16:37:24

thanks for the laugh!

 
 

Comment by jwrjr | 2008-07-22 17:37:19

NoBigotry should make a mental note of this post? With what?

 

Comment by mahaska | 2008-07-22 17:59:21

You know those people don’t really believe in the shit they write here. They are paid, given a script and when they’re done, go and play with their play stations. They run ads to hire these trolls and set them loose. They are less than nothing.

 
 

Comment by Pollpatrol | 2008-07-22 16:14:05

1. People want to vote FOR him and not against him. - WRONG. Half the party wanted someone else

2. He is a very powerful, convincing speechmaker. AND? How does that make him a good leader. Not to mention now we all know that half his motivational speeches were written for Deval Patrick.

3. Fellow World Leaders respect him. RESPECT WHAT? His media image? He is a junior senator with no experience and no record who can’t even unite his own party.

4. Our “enemies” think they may be able to work with him. Again, NO SUBSTANCE. He is an image, they have no idea whether they can “work” with him.

5. FAUX news currently hates him. Because the other networks have failed to be objective in any way. And that’s why millions of Dems are now watching FOX news.

Obama is making an absolute fool of himself in Europe, this whole self indulgent trip will backfire. Stop wasting your time here and go campaign for him in Ohio.

Comment by scott in jupiter | 2008-07-22 16:41:38

“He is a very powerful, convincing speechmaker.”

WHY does everyone continue to push that bullshit. Turn of the teleprompter and he becomes a brick. UMMMM AHHHHH OHHHH whatever Hillary said.

Comment by DAB | 2008-07-22 17:14:27

BO’s interviews, press conferences and many town hall meetings are pathetic. Speeches only go so far for a real President. The day-to-day stuff is where its at most of the time.

 

Comment by Northwest rain | 2008-07-22 17:15:35

I’d give him a “D” for his oratory skills.

The words are not his — he is merely reading a speeching — the speech is not from his heart.

He is like a guy who is practicing to be a tent preacher guy — who is just copying someone else.

BOBO is not original, he copies and mimics other’s work.

 

Comment by mahaska | 2008-07-22 18:00:54

Please, he is a terrible speaker. Sounds like he’s gonna fall asleep at any moment.

 
 

Comment by timepassages | 2008-07-22 17:16:23

This is good, we want to vote for him, not against him? Notice my website? can you figure that out?

He is a good speaker, yes if you drink the kool aid, and have just left the 8th grade, you might believe him.

Our enemies might be able to work with him? Ok, he can talk to all of them. Like Iran, Cuba ect…

Faux may hate him, but maybe you should look at why? At least hannity doesn’t getr chills up his leg when Obama speaks…
http://nativeamericansagainstobama.wordpress.com/

 
 

Comment by Reaper | 2008-07-22 16:14:13

1. People want to vote FOR him and not against him.
2. He is a very powerful, convincing speechmaker.
3. Fellow World Leaders respect him.
4. Our “enemies” think they may be able to work with him.
5. FAUX news currently hates him.

A.What People? The Delegates from Michigan who never voted for him?

B. He is a cry-baby narcissist who waited until the last day to employ a cabal of lawyers to knock Alice Palmer off the ballot with signiture challanges. That’s Not power, it’s cowardice…he would not face her in a fair election.

C. World Leaders like him? Who? Maliki? Maliki travels to Tehran to be told what his opinion is. Ahh and I guess Hamas likes him too.

D.Yes the Enemies of America are licking thier Chops.

E. Sadly it was Fox News who Defended Democracy by allowing Hillary to give her Policy Positions. I know this irritated Obama and supporters, because they like no competition. It helps him win, when it’s a one man game.

Thanks for Playing!

Comment by fif | 2008-07-22 17:38:42

Then LEAVE LEAVE LEAVE LEAVE LEAVE LEAVE LEAVE IF you don’t like it. I don’t go to OBOT sites and spend my days spitting into the wind.

p.s. Hillary is only doing what she has to do to get her health care and other agenda items through. She knows, better than anyone, exactly who/what Obama is.

And news flash: HE DOESN’T WRITE HIS OWN SPEECHES. The rest of us do not find him inspiring or prophetic. His speeches bore the hell out of me with their faux preacher rhythms and Axelrod produced MLK/RFK/JFK mimicry. Sell it somewhere else.

 

Comment by mahaska | 2008-07-22 18:03:02

He’s like the traitor in the castle in films. The one who leaves the gate unlocked for the enemy to sneak in.

 
 

Comment by Obama is a bum | 2008-07-22 16:15:53

What rock did you crawl out from under?

1. I’m voting against Obama and so are millions of others.
2. Disagree. I don’t see anything powerful about his speaking ability, he could probably benefit by joining a Toastmasters club. The only thing he convinced me to do is not vote for him.
3. Disagree. There is no reason for a world leader to respect a compulsive liar who has never accomplished anything.
4. Our enemies may think they can work with him because of their knowledge of Obama’s close friends such as Ayers and Wright.
5. If anyone hates Obama they have valid reasons.

Comment by hank48188 | 2008-07-22 16:40:15

I am voting for McCain because that’s what I can do to STOP OBAMA. Obama is a fraud, McCain said it today. “Obama would rather lose a war if it helps him win the election” McCain was the only person backing the Surge, I thought it was crazy, I didn’t think it would work but I WAS WRONG, so was Obama, but he doesn’t have the guts to admit he was wrong. McCain said he would rather lose an election but win the war, not like Obama, he’s all about self-promotion.

Comment by DAB | 2008-07-22 17:16:45

I agree with you totally. I am actually gradually getting to like McCain so that my vote will be more than just voting against someone.

Comment by fif | 2008-07-22 17:40:33

Read his bio, “Faith of My Fathers,” and you’ll like him even more. He’s an interesting character who comes from a long lineage of true patriots. He’s also feisty and rebellious–I trust that.

 
 

Comment by gmanedit | 2008-07-22 18:18:19

Hank, you weren’t crazy or wrong. What worked was our paying the Sunnis not to fight against us.

 
 
 

Comment by Lou | 2008-07-22 16:16:21

Everyone hates him. You are out of touch. America hates Obama. Only the extreme left, 50% AA’s and kids love Obama.
EVERYONE DESPISES OBAMA BECAUSE
HE IS A THREAT TO NATIONAL SECURITY AND HAS NO IDEA WHAT HE IS DOING. MAKE A MENTAL NOTE FO THIS OKAY?

 

Comment by c.jenkins | 2008-07-22 16:49:19

i agree, adolph hitler.

 

Comment by Ferdberfle | 2008-07-22 16:56:38

Nobigotry stammered:
“1. People want to vote FOR him and not against him.
2. He is a very powerful, convincing speechmaker.
3. Fellow World Leaders respect him.
4. Our “enemies” think they may be able to work with him.
5. FAUX news currently hates him.”

Response

1. Hahahahaha
2. He reads teleprompters, dipstick
3. He is not a world leader so the term “fellow” is a meaningless statement
4. So he’s going to work with enemies, huh?
5. FAUX news hates everything.

AND

6. If you had a brain, you’d play with the tiny thing.

Comment by fif | 2008-07-22 17:42:14

OF COURSE our enemies would prefer to work with him: they know they will have an advantage over someone who is completely ill-equipped. They do not want a strong, knowledgeable opponent. Duh.

 

Comment by mahaska | 2008-07-22 18:05:57

Jesus H. he isn’t a world leader. He’s a wannabe from god knows where. He’s nothing.

 
 
 
 

Comment by Angry Michelle | 2008-07-22 15:47:28

No, we’re just bitter and are clinging to our religion and guns.

Comment by barack who? | 2008-07-22 15:59:51

I’m so bitter I just sent Larry a donation.

(Sukks to have money to spread around to PUMA groups and all anti BO sites.)

;-)

Comment by Angry Michelle | 2008-07-22 16:07:31

I’m so bitter, I’d like to claw Bill’s eyes out.

Comment by Tuppence 411 | 2008-07-22 16:30:17

ROFLMBO! MEchelle is pyscho. I remember the convention in 2004, she was interviewed with Barky Nobama right afterwards. I have forgot exactly what she said or did, but I clearly remember her being so bitchy and condescending to him. On national TV! “Whoa! Get that woman some zoloft and midol!”

 
 
 
 

Comment by Susan Nunes | 2008-07-22 16:04:56

Larry Johnson didn’t write the post.

 

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-07-22 16:23:07

At this point, the DNC is trying to prevent Hillary’s name from being thrown into nomination at the convention. This is not the same as the traditional roll call. Most PUMA’s have made it clear that until this has been rectified, they are prepared to vote for John McCain, because (1) they see him as the more trustworthy candidate and responsible choice (2) they refuse to reward the DNC and their selected nominee for unethical behavior during the primaries and on. (3) Hillary can possibly run again in 2012.

Comment by YONOBAMA | 2008-07-22 16:44:12

Even if he “allows” Hillary to have a roll call and her name is put in nomination, I’m still not voting for his ass. I’m a PUMA but I will never vote in any way, shape, or form on a ticket that has his name on it. I don’t want him anywhere near the White House or foreign affairs.

Comment by mahaska | 2008-07-22 18:07:37

I wouldn’t spit on him if he was on fire.

 
 
 

Comment by JoseyJ | 2008-07-22 17:16:17

Chris Matthews was on Leno last night practically begging the public to vote for Obama.
That tingle has moved up - wayyy past his leg.

 

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-07-22 18:00:58

 
 

Comment by fif | 2008-07-22 17:36:10

Then LEAVE LEAVE LEAVE LEAVE LEAVE LEAVE LEAVE IF you don’t like it. I don’t go to OBOT cites and spend my days spitting into the wind.

p.s. Hillary is only doing what she has to do to get her health care and other agenda items through. She knows, better than anyone, exactly who/what Obama is.

Comment by DoroB | 2008-07-22 20:25:28

I don’t go to OBOT cites and spend my days spitting into the wind.

Obots are scared and desperate.

 
 

Comment by dgr | 2008-07-22 18:12:16

can’t you see its the lunatics running the asylum here, and we are damn crazy too, all because of the thought of that clown Barack Obama getting too close to the Presidency of These United States with the help of the crooked Chicago machniery and a complicit press.

One thing I will say though, my elderly fellow Americans see through this clown with X-ray vision, and they notice the press is in bed with him too. My Middle aged fellow Americans, notice this too. The young ones, well, they can turn easily back to being our spoiled docile kids, especially when they see their parents and grandparents are truly worried about what is going to happen if this clown gets elected. Money out of our pockets is money out of theirs.

We said “Thank You Hillary, we’ll take it from here”. And now our mission is to take Obama down to the mat so hard, he’ll never be able to stand for office outside of Chicago for the rest of his life. Hillary won’t need to get her hands dirty, she has gotten right back to work in the Senate, looking out for our rights, which is more than we can say for Barack Hussein Obama II

 
 

Comment by Diana | 2008-07-22 15:40:38

I think after Denver I’m going to volunteer to help out McCain. I’ve made one donation to him and the RNC, but I’m going to hold off on more till I see what happens. They did nail it in this video.

 

Comment by kenoshaMarge | 2008-07-22 15:41:05

Brilliant ad! I’m not a McCain fan but his campaign nailed the media with this one. Could they look less like journalists and more like adolescents?

Cripes I even found myself agreeing with Tucker Carlson! It takes some real hacks to make Tucker Carlson look professional. Congrats too Lee Cowan and Chris Matthews for do just that.

What a joke our media has become!

Comment by StrawberrybitesBarky | 2008-07-22 16:21:13

Hahahahahha Marge, good to see you again. But you’re right, I thought Bushworld was bizarro world, boy, was I wrong. Obamaland is Bushworld on crack, with a little acid thrown in for fun.

Comment by dgr | 2008-07-22 18:17:08

Ah, I can’t see him using Acid… some fat lines and a couple fatties, yes. Prob some meth and whippits and amyl nitrate too

 
 
 

Comment by Bell'Artista | 2008-07-22 15:43:19

Yeah!!!!!
Crazy Fun Johnny Mac!!!

I am LOVING this

Coming, o the UberDork will attempt to stop incoming missiles with his HUGE Bloated Ego in Saffat!
Wow!

 

Comment by fred | 2008-07-22 15:45:28

America Held Hostage by the Race Card
Kerry use ” Tar Baby” to aide Obama in a win
Video here:
http://countusout.wordpress.com/2008/07/22/obamas-racist-surrogates-play-race-cards/

 

Comment by jus messin wit you man | 2008-07-22 15:47:41

In case you missed it before, check out this link for Chris Matthew’s Leg.

http://chrismatthewsleg.wordpress.com/

Comment by TrainWreckObama | 2008-07-22 15:53:40

That feeling in his leg was Keith Dobermann peeing on it.

Comment by OBSP | 2008-07-22 17:23:04

Dam, that was funny!

 

Comment by dgr | 2008-07-22 18:24:38

naw, his leg, referred to the singular, was his so-called manhood whizzing down his pant leg. dress right, dress left, which side no matter here. Or maybe he was referring to a third appendage, sometimes referred to as “leg” during bragging. maybe that was the appendage that was really tingling.

Chris Matthews has thrown many years as a successful and respected journalist down the tubes for and all he got for it was his wet pants.

 
 
 

Comment by one eyed jack | 2008-07-22 15:50:59

Media? What media? We do not have a media today, there is only the propoganda machines bought and paid for by the elitist.

 

Comment by Obama is a bum | 2008-07-22 15:51:42

If Obama gets in the White House we will all be feeling pains up our left arm into our heart.

Comment by Reaper | 2008-07-22 16:19:12

It’s will cost us an ARM and a Leg.

Chris might want to give up the one with a nerve condition!

:)

 
 

Comment by democracyfirst | 2008-07-22 15:53:29

I’ve been waiting a long time for someone to put something like this out. Looks like the Repubs are finally getting into gear. This is also to our advantage obviously.

 

Comment by OhVoter | 2008-07-22 15:56:17

Oh my God, the irony is just too much! I was watching CNN just now and Blitzer was discussing this ad with guests and asking if the media was in the tank for Obama (not his exact words). The guests both said no, not really. And then in the middle of one of his guests speaking about this ad, CNN broke in mid-sentence with breaking news — all the dramatic music and Breaking News logos. It was Obama arriving in Israel and his short statement to the media. BREAKING NEWS that Obama landed in Israel — breaking into a discussion of whether the media is in LOVE with Barack Obama. It was too funny!

Comment by TeaMug | 2008-07-22 16:03:32

Thats interesting because I knew Obama landed, well over and hour ago or more. I read it on an Israel Newspaper, online.

CNN are really slow or they planned to add that into the middle of the discussion!!

 

Comment by Angry Michelle | 2008-07-22 16:13:14

Why can’t I just eat my bagel.

 

Comment by fif | 2008-07-22 17:45:58

Just like their “self-analysis” of whether or not the media was sexist in their primary coverage.

“Do YOU think we were sexist?”

“No, no, I don’t, do YOU?”

“Absolutely not.”

I don’t watch any of them–it’s all a joke.

 
 

Comment by Susan Nunes | 2008-07-22 15:59:55

It’s a good video, but quite honestly once Obama is the official Democratic nominee, you will see the media do a 180 in support of the person they truly love, and that’s John McCain.

The McCain campaign is being too impatient with its suitors.

 

Comment by katmandu | 2008-07-22 16:01:32

The perfect headline from a Chinese newspaper:

http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90780/91343/6456101.html

Obama’s “intern” trip to Mideast, Europe

Comment by TeaMug | 2008-07-22 16:05:37

Thank You China!!

Comment by barack who? | 2008-07-22 16:12:04

Re: Obama’s two soft ribs: