RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Obama’s Delusional Campaign: Seized by Demons in Their Heads

Obama’s campaign doesn’t need fundraisers or organizers. It needs a team of psychiatrists—and quick. Obama has decided it’s just fine to give the cold shoulder to Hillary Clinton and her 18 million voters—and to former President Bill Clinton—never calling them, or including them in development of strategy, and excluding the most capable political people who worked for them, while pretending this is “party unity.” As Groucho Marx cracked, “Who are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes?”

What possible excuse can Obama invent to justify his continuing mistreatment of Hillary and his disrespect for the greatest president for African-Americans since Lyndon Johnson passed the civil rights and voting rights acts?

In case Obama has forgotten, under the Clinton administration, poverty was reduced 25 percent—one-quarter—with more than 7 million people moved from welfare to work—and 22 million new jobs created—and family incomes and real wages increased for the first time in a generation—and crime reduced by more than 25 percent.

Yes, that Bill Clinton, the one Obama smeared as a racist.

Yes, that Hillary Clinton, the one Obama smeared as racist, too, for stating the historical truth that Lyndon Johnson was essential in passing the civil rights acts and that we need a president on the side of civil rights to make them real.

And if it so happens that Obama is elected, he will be judged by those Clinton benchmarks—a president he dismissed as not producing change compared to…Ronald Reagan—who blocked progress for African-Americans.

Now what possible alibi can the Obama campaign offer for continuing to poke Hillary and those 18 million voters in the eye?

Chuck Todd, NBC’s political editor, explained today on MSNBC’s Morning Joe. According to Big Tent Democratic, on Talkleft.com, Todd has been talking to the geniuses of the Obama campaign. Here’s what they told him:

On Morning Joe, Chuck Todd said that the “feeling in Chicago,” presumably referring to the Obama campaign, is that Hillary Clinton is seeking treatment that she would never have given Barack Obama had the roles been reversed. If they REALLY believe that, then they are fools. If Hillary Clinton were the nominee, Barack Obama would have been the vice presidential nominee a month ago. I can not believe Todd is passing on this foolishness.

But Chuck Todd is not the problem. He’s just relating the unbalanced state of mind of Obama’s campaign.

Let’s follow their whacked out thinking. They fantasize that Hillary would cut them out and dump on them if she were the nominee. Therefore, it’s legitimate for them to cut her out and dump on her and her supporters. Make sense?

Had Chuck Todd consulted with any psychiatrist he would have learned that the Obama campaign suffers from what Freud identified as neurotic “projection.” Projection is a defense mechanism by which negative impulses, motives and actions are displaced onto others, especially on those serving as the objects of those negative feelings and attacks. Projection can be a fantasy rationalization and lead to full-blown paranoia. It is also obviously a form of denial.

Unless treated, the symptoms will worsen.

Obama’s campaign doesn’t have a theme song, except maybe for Ludacris’ foul-mouthed jingle calling Hillary a “bitch.”

Wouldn’t this one from Gnarls Barkley be an appropriate theme song for the Obama campaign?

Check out this video of Gnarls Barkley’s great song, “Crazy.”

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post255 Comments »

Comment by DiamondTiger | 2008-08-07 12:01:21

I am just blown away how most of the country has become completely unhinged by Gumby. I’m still wondering what happened….the pod people.

Comment by valsthewoman | 2008-08-07 12:47:25

I VISTED CLINTONS WEB TODAY AND FELT SICK TO MY STOMACH. SHE ANSWERED 12 QUESTIONS THAT WERE MEANINGLESS TO THE PUMA RISING. I CANNOT AND WILL NOT EVER VOTE FOR THIS SELECTED NOMINEE BO S AN INDONESIAN CITIZEN. HE IS A FRAUD!
http://www.hillaryloyalistnowformccain.com

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-07 12:52:19

Oh, calm down, Francis.

And stop with the ALL CAPS.

Clinton is doing what a smart politician does–behaving in a dignified manner.

If you can’t “get” that, you’re either stupid, or a troll.

If Obama implodes, she’s there to step in. If he doesn’t, he’ll lose in November and she’ll be tanned, rested and ready four years from now.

Anyone who wants her to stomp her foot and cry is an idiot and an asshole. That’s what Team O does, see?

Comment by Francis | 2008-08-07 13:56:25

Sorry that wasn’t me but it’s nice to know you all have been thinking of me since my banishment.

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-07 22:29:18

Francis, you have more names than Your Messiah. Go pull your pud, you frightened little troll.

Actually, no. Feel free to hang around. See, you’re a HARBINGER.

If Barack were winning, you wouldn’t be here.

 
 

Comment by norrismorris | 2008-08-07 16:47:19

Yes, agreed. Also if Clinton does not behave in a concilliatory manner she will become irrelevant politically.

She is still a loyal Democrat and as such it’s her duty to back all Dems running for office in entire country as well as BO.

It is totally naive to think that politicians musn’t compromise, and frankly her First job is that as Senator from New York which she is totally aware of.

If she cannot be seen as a team player she has no political capital, or future.

It would be good if our bloggers would study up on how political parties are constructed, and a good course in Civics would further inform them as to how our cities,states,and federal government function and what their responsibilities are.

Comment by Mary | 2008-08-07 17:50:53

On the other hand, norris, if Obama is perceived as snubbing the Clintons–as in, “we don’t need them or their supporters to win,” HIS political career will be over.

 

Comment by sakel | 2008-08-08 12:39:17

NorrisMorris, thanks for civic lesson 101.

Absolutely, politicians will become irrelevant (not Hillary) if they don’t work in a conciliatory way conducive to working both sides of the aisle with the other party members. And Hillary needs no lesson from ANYONE on this issues.

Hillary and McCain established an excellent working relationsip at the Senate. They went together to Baghdad in 2005 and John McCAIN PRAISED SEN. CLINTON when asked if she’d make a good President.

“Sen. Hillary Clinton I am sure will make a great President”—Sen. John McCain to Time Russert, Meet the Press ‘05 interview (Iraq)

 
 
 

Comment by Dawnelle Leona del Puma | 2008-08-07 12:52:23

WHOA Larry!!

That was a really HOT song! Loved all of it! Thanks!

Comment by Ellen D. | 2008-08-07 12:59:25

As an animator, I loved the visuals. My mom however, might pick this old song as an ode to Democratic choices in the past:

I fall in love too easily
I fall in love too fast
I fall in love too terribly hard,
for love to ever last…

 
 

Comment by Lin | 2008-08-07 13:01:29

relax. i don’t think you get it at all.

 

Comment by Gloria | 2008-08-07 13:33:37

It sure was disappointing after the buildup by Paul on last night’s PUMA blogradio show….

Comment by CountryFirst | 2008-08-07 14:03:37

I missed the live chat at noon - but just now went to the site to read and I thought I must be missing something - all I could see was that Hillary was stumping FOR Obama. Did I miss something?

 
 

Comment by MMiller | 2008-08-07 15:15:48

I just hung the phone up with the LaRouche Dems and they said that HRC was threatened. She was told if she continued she and her family would be murdered.
I think this is imortant to note for all of us. Look at what’s happening to the banks. Obama is in the thick of it. he is owned by the banks.
Can you imagine thet would threaten her life?

Comment by WaitAMinute | 2008-08-07 15:48:47

Your tin foil hat is getting too tight! Loosen it a bit…

 
 
 

Comment by ndree | 2008-08-07 14:13:14

Truth the Democratic Party needs to be dumped, and dissolved for GROSS INEPTITUDE. Nothing else would suffice.

 

Comment by Disgusted | 2008-08-07 16:57:30

This is a bit OT. I came across this video entitled Convention Crasher. It is posted on Fox News. I can not link the exact video so you need to hit videos then Convention Crasher. To me it makes a lot of sense. Imagine this: even if Obama comes out of the roll call vote with the needed delegates, how will it look for him, when the whole nation hears the roll call? California, How do you vote? Hillary Clinton. New York, How do you vote? Hillary Clinton. New Jersey, How do you vote? Hillary Clinton. So on and so forth. Idaho, How do you vote? Obama. Alabama, How do you vote? Obama. The fact that Obama took an asswhipping in huge democratic states will be on full display for the world to see. This will add even more doubt to the already shakey notion that Obama won fair and square.
http://www.foxnews.com/video/index.html

 
 

Comment by bayareavoter | 2008-08-07 12:03:39

I’m still shaking my head that the Dems pushed this arrogant flip-floppin’ fraud on us. In a country of 300 million people the 2 choices we have are this thug and Mr Magoo?

Obama is so full of his precious self he will realize too late that he should have kissed and made up with the Clintons.

But remember Donkey Brazile told Gore to run away from Bill Clinton because of a sex scandal in spite of the fact that he had huge popularity ratings and support. I hope her good advice bites her in the a** again.

Comment by roseeriter | 2008-08-07 12:30:04

Bush made me ashamed to be an American and the mind blindness by Obama’s supporters make me ashamed still.

I yearn to feel proud to be American again at least once more before I die.

Comment by scott in jupiter | 2008-08-07 12:39:54

Give MIchelle O’Angry a call she can help you out.

America has problems but that is a dumbass thing to say.

Comment by roseeriter | 2008-08-07 12:47:26

Fuck you scott. Your the dumbass bot koolaid person unable to think for yourself. Grow Up!

Comment by valsthewoman | 2008-08-07 12:49:09

 

Comment by JoeVet | 2008-08-07 13:08:59

I rarely use the Fungu words but let’s face it, the Obots or Idiots.

 

Comment by WaitAMinute | 2008-08-07 15:51:17

Nice. Anger control problems?

 
 
 
 

Comment by Karma | 2008-08-07 13:58:14

Geez…I’m starting to wonder what real or perceived slight the Clintons did to Brazile?

You would think that she would learn from her mistake to have Gore run from Clinton.

Either way, she has had it out for them for years rather than admit her mistake or dislike. She is running Obama down the same path as Gore to prove she is right about stabbing the Clintons in the back.

Comment by 935 Lies | 2008-08-07 15:07:29

The REAL “sin” of both Clintons, to Donkey Brassiere, Dean, Jimmy Carter et al is that they appear to have a good time governing and that they don’t really give a rat’s ass about the Good Will of the chattering classes or the culturally vapid and deficient who require assurances from Dowd or Olberman or Couric or the NYT Style Section to externally validate their feelings.

“TailGate?” - Well, MOST of the world thought it was pretty funny that we had a Pres who was still spry enough to collect a header or two from a fat girl.

Clinton economy - Shot the shit out of that Laffer Curve fairy tale, didn’t it? RAISE taxes and the economy gets better? Who’d a thunk it?

Paula Corbin Jones - I have a collection of Paula Corbin Jones jokes from what I call the “Hillary’s Hilarity Collection.”

Q: What’s the difference between Paula Corbin Jones and a trampoline?

A: Most men remove their shoes before jumping on a trampoline.

Many, many, many of My Fellow Americans have the souls of dung beetles and shit for brains .

Ergo, the Great Mahogany Bhagwan.

Or:

“Gary Hart with funny ears.”

Oh, this could go ona and on, but I see Nurse Nasty and the Doc approaching with the battery charger and the gurney, so it must be lunch time now…

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-07 22:42:59

Gary Hart with funny ears?

Gee, is there a Donna Rice/Monkey Business out there waiting to be plastered over the tabloids?

 
 

Comment by Just A Thought | 2008-08-07 19:53:46

The Clintons did nothing to Brazille, or any of the other DNC losers.

Brazille and the others made themselves fools by running away from, and shunning, the Clintons.

They are angry at themselves but take no responsibility for their ineptitude, and need someone to scapegoat for their failures. Otherwise they would have to admit to being the losers they are.

Therefore, they blame the Clintons, the only true Dem winners, for not saving them from themselves.

In other words the Clintons, then as now, despite their horrendous treatment, should have stepped in and saved all of the self-righteous fools from committing political suicide based upon their own ignorance and prejudice toward the Clintons.

They are all ego-maniacal losers, still without a clue, and still trying to blame the Clintons for their own stupidity, and lack of judgement.

 
 
 

Comment by sfhillary | 2008-08-07 12:04:46

Crazy like a fox, maybe. You’re a pro, Larry — surely you realize that Obama is going to win this election, and probably fairly easily? And surely you understand that he really would be crazy to offer HRC the veep slot? Just to take the most obvious reason — surely you understand that Bill Clinton will never assent to the amount of financial background checks that would be required. And god bless the Clintons, I think Bill was probably our greatest president since FDR, but they come with lots and lots of lots of baggage. Obama’s doing just fine, and I’m confident he’ll make the right choices for his inner circle.

Comment by bayareavoter | 2008-08-07 12:09:16

why should Sen Clinton even consider the VP slot with the fraud? Let him lose on his own. When it comes down to November it will become a matter of trust–and people won’t trust an inexperienced pretty smile with a resume as thin as the paper it’s printed on. They’ll vote for McCranky. I will never vote for BO.

Comment by JoeVet | 2008-08-07 13:11:45

curiously, which bay area? i originated from north bay of sf. a lot of idiots voted for that tard. and, who could ever imagine dumber candidates running for president in the new millenium?

Comment by andySF | 2008-08-07 22:57:07

I am from SF. Lucky me, I am uneducated, therefore must use my brain to think.

Well, people who think with their brain, not emotion can’t honestly vote for Obama.

But then, if you’re like sfhillary who’s rich(he said) and probably drive a big v8(environment caring), symbolism is more important than substance.

 
 
 

Comment by HARP | 2008-08-07 12:10:25

Surely you understand THAT YOUR AN IDIOT.

Comment by sfhillary | 2008-08-07 12:30:49

I think you mean YOU’RE an idiot, not YOUR. LOL.

Comment by HARP | 2008-08-07 12:36:25

He may look like an idiot and talk like an idiot but don’t let that fool you. He really is an idiot.

 

Comment by scott in jupiter | 2008-08-07 12:43:22

Great grammar lessons from someone with the screen name “so fuck hillary”.

 

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-08-07 12:46:26

sfhillary, what does the sf stand for: shut the fuck hillary.:

Anyone who thinks like you or even support that IDIOT, is indeed an IDIOT.

Comment by JoeVet | 2008-08-07 13:15:39

i think that acronym would be sfth. so, maybe you need glasses?

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-08-07 15:10:56

Oh yeah, and maybe you need an enema ’cause you’re full ot it, Obama-butt.

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-07 22:49:37

Every time a bot posts, they are transmitting their fear that the Inevitable Messiah is not so inevitable.

Think about it–if your candidate was a sure winner, would you even waste your time trading insults with the opposition? I sure wouldn’t.

I’d be dancing in the streets, happy as hell, if my candidate were sailing to victory.

Every post from one of these idiots, getting rude and snarky, is IMPORTANT. They are, in effect, messages to us from the Obama Camp–and the messages are saying “OH FUCK…our CANDIDATE IS TANKING!!! Shit, shit, SHIT!!!! We need to try to discredit and shut up all these people who don’t like him…we have to CONTROL THE MESSAGE!!! Awwwww, SHIT!!!! Make them STOP, Ma, make them STOP!!!”

Or words to that effect.

Laugh when you see them. Let your heart lift with every snarky, shitty comment they make.

The more they post, the lower Obama is in the polls. The correlation is obvious. It’s demonstrable, too.

I love the smell of frightened, pissy, angered troll in the morning! You should, too–it’s as sweet as summer perfume…or autumn pot-pourri!!!

 
 
 
 

Comment by Just A Thought | 2008-08-07 19:58:00

Yep!, SF-You’re an idiot would be absolutely correct.

 
 

Comment by WaitAMinute | 2008-08-07 15:54:07

surely you understand that you cannot spell.

 
 

Comment by Firefly | 2008-08-07 12:10:29

You’re an idiot, bot.

On November 5, I and millions and millions and millions of others will be doing the happy dance on bambi’s political grave.

Comment by sfhillary | 2008-08-07 12:32:47

Not sure why you call me a “bot,” unless in your mind, by definition, anyone who supports Obama is a bot. Whatever. If you read anything other than Koolaid posts on PUMA sites, you would understand that the odds of McCain winning on November 5 are pretty low. But no problem — you tell yourself whatever you want.

Comment by JML | 2008-08-07 13:03:16

Have you seen the polls?

And the Republicans haven’t even really hit Obama yet. They are rubbing their hands together in glee, knowing they have info on-hand, at-the-ready, to swiftly knock Obama off his self-perceived perch once the conventions are over.

Obama as the nominee will in retrospect make Kerry and Dukakis look good.

Comment by JoeVet | 2008-08-07 13:17:54

average people might forget things but not the GOP types: Oboreme is going to be a relic of the past sooner than later.

 
 

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-07 13:07:09

Wow, another scared troll. Why am I not surprised?

Keep whistling in the dark, ya pudpuller.

It won’t help your tanking hero.

 

Comment by Firefly | 2008-08-07 13:08:56

Your pernicious, smug, smarmy arrogance is exceeded only by your grand stupidity.

And, since you are obviously in denial about it, let me make it clear for you: Yes - ANYBODY who backs bambi IS A BOT.

No intelligent, aware, rational, compassionate HUMAN could ever support the FRAUD that is oblowme.

You and your despicable playmates have destroyed the democratic party - your aim, no doubt. The good news is that you soulless bottom-dwellers have destroyed yourselves and your futures in the process.

Obama will not only lose, he will be discredited, humiliated and destroyed politically for the remainder of his unremarkable life. And you and your sorry band of bots will spend the remainder of your sorry lives screaming “Nobody likes us ’cause everybody’s a racist!” as the rest of the world laughs.

Comment by JoeVet | 2008-08-07 13:19:11

love’n the thought and images of that!

 

Comment by WaitAMinute | 2008-08-07 15:59:06

you are so full of love and hope and joy. thanks for your inspiring post.

 
 

Comment by lmv | 2008-08-07 13:10:52

Honey, I’ll …. type … really … slowly … so … you’ll … understand.

Even … the … MSM … (except MSNBC) … have … realized … that … Barky … can’t … win.

He’s … not … really … tied … because … of … the … Bradley … Effect. He’s … actually … losing … to … McCain.

Don’t … bet … your … allowance … on … Barky … to … win … in … November.

Clear, snookums? Good. Now, run back to dkos. Of course, they have so many idiots, they probably haven’t missed you.

Comment by JoeVet | 2008-08-07 13:20:13

 

Comment by RunningDogLackey | 2008-08-07 13:58:17

“I am completely committed to helping Senator Obama become the next President of the United States and urging all of you to do the same.”

Hillary Clinton, today

Comment by WIldChild | 2008-08-07 14:05:16

It would be great if BOBO would keep his word like Hillary does.

 

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2008-08-07 16:15:27

With all respect to Senator Clinton, the urge I get is pull the string for McCain.

By supporting “run flat tires” BO, which to a great many people is against their self interest, I am doing what many millions of Democrats and Indies will do on 11/4/08.

Telling BO to Sod OFF.

Look, I heard an interview this AM with Lanie Davis on Don Imus, and he wants to tell everybody think “5-4″. It sounded like the poor man had Chinese finger cuffs on.

Sorry Lanie, I ain’t buying that crap after BO had to TOLD not to vote for John Roberts.

BO is a LOOOOOOSER. He was back to calling people idiots today….no brains, no class, no experience, no communication skills to speak of….he is a first class wanker.

 
 
 

Comment by s. hall | 2008-08-07 13:52:17

sfhillary — phone it in next time.

 

Comment by Chelsea Patriot | 2008-08-07 14:38:34

Hey, Gang!

Stanley Anne is giving Free Head after Russian Class to All Good Party Members in the Fourth Floor janitor’s closet!

Comment by andySF | 2008-08-07 23:04:06

This is a paid Otroll. Always foul mouth and sexist! Never any discussion. Obots are trying to smear this site.

 
 

Comment by WaitAMinute | 2008-08-07 15:56:27

you do realize that you will be celebrating a person with a 100% voting record against women’s reproductive rights? One who cannot even use a computer but will guide this country in this technological age? Who abandoned his hurt wife to take up with a younger, richer woman? Yes, you really love this country.

 

Comment by Postmaster | 2008-08-07 17:52:08

you’re fooling yourself, Obama will not win.

 

Comment by Just A Thought | 2008-08-07 20:15:20

SF - You are called a bot because of such ridiculous messianic statements like: “surely you realize that Obama is going to win this election, and probably fairly easily?”

And, like this: “Obama’s doing just fine, and I’m confident he’ll make the right choices for his inner circle.”

In the first instance, only a bot, or an absolute fool, would make such concrete pronouncements given the current status of the race, and Obama’s stagnated campaign.

In the second instance, given all of the people that are “not the people Obama knew”, or in some cases “hardly knew”, yet were integral elements in his life for decades, and are now discarded like yesterday’s newpaper, your statement is ridiculous.

It is very hard to suddenly accept Obama as being unquestionably able to make the correct choices under any circumstances.

Your readiness to disregard reality in both instances, again, means you are a bot or an easily deceived fool.

 
 

Comment by RunningDogLackey | 2008-08-07 13:56:39

Actually, there’s about 4,000 of you, Web-wide, if you add up all the Alexa stats.

 

Comment by WaitAMinute | 2008-08-07 16:01:21

millions and millions? More like a few thousand. Looking in your rear view mirror?

 
 

Comment by Fenelon spoke | 2008-08-07 12:14:48

You have got to be kidding?!! You mention Bill Clinton not being able to come through the finacial background checks. Do you have ANY idea how many records Obama has refused to offer-academic records, medical records, passport, a birth certificate that doesn’t appear to be forged? Obama appears to be doing some major league hidiing of info.

Comment by ndree | 2008-08-07 14:18:04

STATE SENATE RECORDS. A big ole empty O == Zero!!!!

Comment by Lyn | 2008-08-07 16:31:34

college records

 
 
 

Comment by wodiej | 2008-08-07 12:17:00

surely you jest??

 

Comment by Faustina | 2008-08-07 12:21:00

This line of reasoning reminds me of an old boss of mine. The only thing that saved him was the statute of limitations.

 

Comment by Uña de Gato | 2008-08-07 12:22:45

And stop calling me Shirley!!!

 

Comment by Zeke | 2008-08-07 12:26:03

Believing your bullshit is an activity you’ll find over at Stop the Schmears not here, you dumb turd. Obama is circling the drain, your head is up your ass and all is still going according to my nefarious plans!
GFY

Comment by sfhillary | 2008-08-07 12:35:58

GFY? Really? That’s the level of discourse here now? I see you guys are reaching your proper intellectual level.

FYI, Obama is not “circling the drain” — he was definitely sliding for a week or so, but that has leveled off, McCain’s embarrassingly juvenile negative ads are backfiring, and Obama is moving back into a small but steady lead. Here are the most recent relevant national polls from the past two or three days:

http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1829948,00.html (Time, +5)
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/general_election_match_up_history (Rasmussen, +2)
http://www.gallup.com/poll/109312/Gallup-Daily-Obama-46-McCain-44.aspx (Gallup, +2)
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5ijClHoidEl8XEJMJoUooHU1R_nmgD92D2ET01 (CBS, +6)
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/08/06/obama.polls/ (CNN Poll of Polls, +5)

Live in a world of PUMA delusion if you want. In the real world, Obama is winning, has been ever since the end of the primaries, and probably will be winning all year, and probably will win in November.

Comment by RepublicanChick | 2008-08-07 12:41:33

Obviously you took a vacation last week when Senator McCain was ahead.

Comment by sfhillary | 2008-08-07 13:04:49

I’ve been busy, yes, but McCain wasn’t ahead last week. In the national numbers he briefly achieved a tie, but it didn’t hold; Obama is back into a small lead.

 
 

Comment by simanov | 2008-08-07 12:42:30

Sounds like you live in one of those seven imaginary states.

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-08-07 12:49:56

Yeah, the states of Confusion, Delusion, Projection, Hate, Anarchy, Paranoia, and Megalomania.

Comment by Newly Independent | 2008-08-07 13:34:33

“Yeah, the states of Confusion, Delusion, Projection, Hate, Anarchy, Paranoia, and Megalomania.”

LOL!!!

Really.

Obama is done in November. And even many who back Obama secretly acknowledge that he will lose to McCain.

Only the clueless few like those who still troll for Obama here delusionally believe that Obama will win the White House. And they “cling” to cheap media hype and faulty polls to support their deluded beliefs in Obama’s “inevitability.”

 

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2008-08-07 16:22:48

he was definitely sliding

ewww!

Whoah God only knows, God makes his plan
The information’s unavailable to the mortal man
We’re workin’ our jobs, collect our pay
Believe BO’s gliding down the highway, when in fact BO’s slip sliding away

…..

*Deep Truths…nailed it!

 
 

Comment by lmv | 2008-08-07 13:26:51

That was good. LMAO.

 
 

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-07 13:23:42

Scared, scared, troll. Types a ton of bullshit. Offers a bunch of cherry picked links.

No one reads it.

Go away, little troll.

Every post you make here demonstrates your stomach-twisting fear. You know this is a site in opposition to your candidate, yet you come here, trolling, snarking, goading…WHY? Are you paid? Are you desperately trying to convince people to believe your bareass emperor has a few shreds of clothing on? Are you doing it to beat back the terror, that your hero is going to lose, and lose big?

You’re not going to change a single heart or mind. You’re not going to change a single vote TOWARDS Obama.

You might convince a few third party/write-in voters to say, Awww, fuck it–and vote for McCain INSTEAD.

It sucks being you–your idol is going to lose. Why? Because he’s stupid, just like his supporters. Because he’s arrogant and rude, just like his supporters. Because he exercises profoundly poor judgment…just like his supporters.

You don’t build a party by chopping it in half–Obama quite obviously doesn’t understand that. And neither, it’s clear, do you!

Comment by RunningDogLackey | 2008-08-07 13:59:52

You tell ‘im, CF! Bloody troll bastard.

 
 

Comment by getfitnow | 2008-08-07 16:39:06

The CBS poll over sampled dems and under sampled indys. This is the same crap that went on during the primaries.

 
 

Comment by 935 Lies | 2008-08-07 15:23:43

“Circling ze Drain?”

Mais non, M’sieur!

His Most Emminently De Luxe Self, Field Marshal The Reverend Doctor President for Life Idi Amin Dada ObamaYoMomma is SO cool and SOOOOOO Transcendent that he is NOT and HAS NEVER BEEN subject to the Coriolis Effect.

If you’ll just refer to his Web site, under WORM #762, you’ll see that he explains: “That’s not the Gaspard-Gustave de Coriolis I knew for the last 216 years.”

So, you see, being freed of the shabby traditions of Physics by Hope and Change, we can expect The Mahogany Bhagwan to NOT circle the drain, but, instead, go DIRECTLY from the bowl, through the S-bend and into the shit tank!

Upon his arrival there, the aerobic and anearobic bacteria will say, “YOU’RE THE ONE WE’VE BEEN WAITING FOR!,” and, “YES, WE CAN!”

Bon Voyage, Mahogany Bhagwan…don’t bother to write!

 
 

Comment by Dan | 2008-08-07 12:27:08

Troll alert.

 

Comment by helen | 2008-08-07 12:29:27

I do hope this was snark.
Doing fine for his inner circle?
How about doing fine for the people of this country?

COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY ALWAYS

PUMAS AND BUBBAS RULE

 

Comment by cdo | 2008-08-07 12:33:58

sf–a little curious where you are drawing your conclusions from. Obama’s polling lately is quite disturbing. He is losing ground, not gaining it. And those numbers come at a time when democrats outnumber republicans and the mood of the country is as favoarable to a democrat as it will ever be. Also, he is currently outspending McCain 7-1 in ads, McCain hasn’t even started his campaign in essence. Obama’s favorables are dropping because of his own missteps.
His recent concession to supporting the full seating of MI and FL should tell you something.
Not selecting Hillary as VP was a pretty dumb move. He needs Hillary’s voters. If you are ASSUMING independents and undecided voters are going to break largely for Obama, I’d love know your reasons.

What you are trying to say about Bill I have no idea…of course he would assent to having his financial records checked, his wife was running for President. So that statement is totally absurd, though in keeping with a typical Obama supporters CDS syndrome.

Comment by sfhillary | 2008-08-07 12:40:52

See my links above. There is no question that Obama was sliding in the polls for at least a week; at his low point a week or so ago, the best numbers had him and McCain in roughly a tie nationally. As you can see from the links I offered above, he has since moved back into a small lead in a number of national polls. And the state by state numbers as applied to the electoral college have never stopped projecting an Obama victory. And all of that doesn’t even take into account the ground/organizational game, which will hugely favor Obama.

Not to mention the fact that McCain is an absolute train wreck of a candidate and campaign. Go look at Intrade or any of the other political betting sites if you want to know what the pros think.

Comment by Donna Brazile | 2008-08-07 12:43:34

What the S F is back!

As the Obama campaign likes to respond:

“Whatever.”

Stop the hate!

 

Comment by Vonay | 2008-08-07 12:54:09

….and this when a democrat at this time should dbe 20 points ahead.

BO is a fraud and liar.

Oh yes, whu doesn’t Bo release All of his records for the American people?????

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-07 13:30:20

Hell, Dukakis was up by seventeen around this time!!!!

Even Kerry had a decent lead.

I guess there’s only one thing to say–The Big O can’t even hold a candle to Helmet-Tank Mike!

He’s going to get his ass handed to him. His trolling little pals here, and his acolytes, will whine about racism, vote fixing, voter suppression, Diebold, you name it.

They won’t state the obvious, though: Shitty, arrogant, lousy, obnoxious, divisive candidate.

This should have been the Democrats’ year. Thanks to Obama, it won’t be. The fucking jerk.

Comment by Steve in KC | 2008-08-07 14:48:42

Sometimes I think the reason so many of the O-kids, the political newcomers, actually believe his victory is inevitable is because they have been raised in the “new” PC school systems where “everybody gets their turn.” Everyone gets an “award” for just showing up. They can’t imagine a loss by their “cool” candidate to an “old guy.”

Let’s see, now… how many “cool” Democratic contenders, supported by the “youth vote” have had their sense of inevitability shattered on an early Wednesday morning in a leap year November? And I’ve always voted Democratic so I should know the answer to this one… let’s see, for me it started with George McGovern. All the kids were crazy about him. How many states did he win? As I recall, he didn’t even win his home state. Just lonely liberal Mass.

 
 
 

Comment by catherine | 2008-08-07 12:56:00

SF- Does it make you proud to be supporting a fraud? Says a lot about your intelligence and morality.