RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

TALES FROM THE FRONT

793px-2008_wash_state_democratic_caucus_17c.jpg

Approximately a year ago thousands of committed volunteers attended “Camp Obama,” a four-day indoctrination program, geared at teaching pre-screened Obama volunteers grass roots organizational strategies.  

The training, which specifically focused on the caucus states, taught volunteers to be “ruthless,” “take risks,” and win at all costs. Obama’s campaign and Camp Obama’s strategy which focused on the vulnerable caucuses and the early primaries worked. 

Obama only lost 1 out of 14 caucuses, a staggering achievement, especially when he lost 21 out of 38 primaries and scored a statistical tie in popular vote.   How did he accomplish such an astonishing string of victories that would eventually define the Democratic Primary? 

At www.caucusanalysis.org, a new website devoted exclusively to the 2008 Democratic caucuses, you can read Tales from the Front, stories told to sites founder, Dr. Lynette Long, by participants in all 14 caucus states.  Here are excerpts from  the website. For complete statements and a mathematical analysis of each state, go to www.caucusanalysis.org.

FROM IOWA

I live in Davenport, Iowa - Precinct 23.  I arrived at our precinct caucus at 6:30.  At 6:50 pm, over 75 people of African American descent came walking in, past the tables and sat in the Obama section.  I knew one of them from my canvassing.  I knew another one who did not live in this precinct!  And aside from the 4 or 5 families that live on Hillandale Road, there are no other black people in this unusually white precinct and one of those black couples were in my Hillary section.  The results were Obama 3, Clinton, 2, Edwards 1!  It was impossible for me to argue since the precinct chair was an Obama supporter from another precinct.  A very large bus was seen in the parking lot afterwards carrying these folks back.

FROM IOWA

You probably have heard about the busloads coming in from over the IL border, but you may not have known about the busloads coming in from the NE border. North Omaha and Omaha itself are two of the three places in NE — Lincoln being the third — where there’s over 5% African-American population. Obama’s campaign offered people things like I-pods and free stuff– t-shirts, clothes, shoes, and at least two free meals on the Nebraska side.

FROM KANSAS

There were a lot of young people there and a lot of black people.  We do not have that many blacks in this county.  El Dorado is a small town of about 12,000 and it is the largest town in the county.  There are probably only a handful of blacks that live in El Dorado.  I work with the school district and travel to the high school, middle school and elementary schools and believe me, there are very, very, few  black students.

FROM MINNESOTA

There was NO voter registration for the MN caucus… no identification was checked so Obots were going from room to room voting over and over again giggling all the while doing it. 

FROM NEVADA

Throughout this mess of a process, hostility built to a degree I found truly alarming.  Some overenthusiastic BHO supporters formed a gauntlet in the hallway outside the registration area, on the way to the ballroom, within the zone in which campaigning was prohibited.  Any HRC supporter was subject to verbal abuse, ridicule and, eventually, physical assault.

FROM NEBRASKA

Nebraska was totally chaotic and each precinct location had a different way to do the caucus. In Nebraska, 18 precincts where crammed into one high school in Sarpy county. When I got there, it felt like I stepped into a Third World voting situation. They were trying to determine whether people could actually participate in the caucuses or not, and then it seemed like they just gave up on that and just let anyone participate. There was a gym at the high school where about 5 precincts met. A person was supposed to fill out their preference on a slip of paper and then turn it in. They tried to run it like a primary instead of a true caucus, just take out any semblance of order and guards against voter disenfranchisement that a normal primary would have. I found a pile of these preferences slips just sitting on a table where anyone could pick them up and fill them out.

FROM TEXAS

I was at the Texas Caucus and the Obama supporter’s took the Packets as early as 6:30 AM which they were told not to do, They never let go and then when time came to vote they took over the precinct by some of them pushing the people that were supposed to run it across the room to chairs. They called in incorrect totals for Obama instead of correct ones. He actually had 4 delegates and they called in 19 delegates.

When my 88 year old Mother showed up, who can hardly walk on her walker, and they took her walker away from her when she said she was there to vote for Hillary. They said you are in the wrong place old woman; this is an Obama precinct, and you need to go across town. When I saw what was happening I called the police.  Blog post no quarter evelyn

FROM TEXAS

As an eye witness at the Precinct and Senate District Conventions, this is how Obama won many caucuses. First of all, vast numbers of Obama supporters were bused in to the conventions. They were loud and intimidating. Texas Democratic rules state that each person who participates in the Precinct Convention should have voted in this precinct and sign-in personally on a formal sign-in sheet. So many Obama people showed up, that there were not enough sign-in sheets available, so when the conventions ended, there were many sign-in sheets for Obama filled out in the same handwriting, not signed-in as specified. As Hillary supporters, we obtained copies of these sign-in sheets from all over south Texas, Harris County in particular. We laboriously compared the names on the sheets to see if the person who attended the precinct convention had voted in the primary election. Many listed Obama people had not. We then cross-checked the names of the Obama people to see if they lived in the correct precinct. Many times the Obama people did not come to the correct precinct and often appeared on sign-in sheets, as being present in several precinct conventions at the same time (a violation of the space-time continuum).

FROM THE TEXAS CONVENTION

I walked into the Nueses,Texas County Convention only to discover that I was already there as an Obama delegate.

FROM THE TEXAS CONVENTION

They shoved Obama signs in Clinton delegates’ faces, three inches from the nose, called them racists, and told my friend that she had to move from her third-row seat in one meeting and go sit in the back.  She also said that the proceedings were heavily laced with black power speeches by preachers as well as public officials.

FROM WASHINGTON STATE

What I saw was at least 3 trained group agitators — Since my MA is in group dynamics and group facilitation I recognized when someone is using techniques that I have been trained in. If such individuals were planted in ALL precincts, along with bringing in ringers — then ALL caucus results are bogus. For this sort of intensive origination to take place in a rural area — this means that a vast amount of money was spent to manipulate the results of the caucus. The Obama supporters kept changing the number of delegates — subtracting Clinton delegates and increasing Obama delegates, each time they claimed someone had changed and they had to do "complicated" math and that’s why Clinton kept losing delegates. There were NO Clinton supporters checking the Obama "math".

Read full accounts at www.caucusanalysis.org.

Contact DrLynetteLong@aol.com

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post265 Comments »

Comment by Phishmelt | 2008-08-21 18:27:53

and they think the hillary supporters who attended the caucus to get screamed at are going to vote for obama. they did more harm to the party than they did good.

If this is the type of new party obama was talking about i’m outta there.

Comment by Paul F. Villarreal | 2008-08-21 18:43:44

Thanks so much, Lynette, for your hard work on this issue and the site. This is exactly what we need to do, expose the fraud, so that it doesn’t happen again.

Many Hillary supporters from the caucuses will never support Barry, as Phishmelt correctly points out.

Team McCain has released its second video ad of the day, ‘Housing Problem,’ discussing Rezko and Barry’s Rezko Mansion:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChCz1gnuIcI

Pass it on, favorite it and spread the word!

Comment by fif | 2008-08-21 19:24:15

I’m glad McCain is not shying away from these issues. If the MSM won’t do their job, let the Republicans expose the truth. Someone has to.

Comment by Hillary Harridan | 2008-08-21 19:36:18

That was fast! Johnny on the spot.

 
 

Comment by katmandu | 2008-08-21 19:57:58

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/news/080820_NBC-WSJ_Released.pdf

In the latest NBC/WSJ poll, Hillary would have a 6 point lead over McCain. Obama has a three point lead.

Tell that to the delegates.

 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-08-22 06:14:39

FASCIST IS AS FASCIST DOES….Thankyou Dr. Long. I’m from Texas and saw the Texas Hornswaggle myself. Teenagers who were not eligible to vote showed up at the caucuses and caucused. One of them was proudly bragging to her pal, my daughter who had just turned 18 and was excited about voting and caucusing for Hillary. My daughter was astonished and said to her friend in front of the group that She should be ASHAMED of herself and that she had committed VOTER FRAUD akin to what happens in 3rd world countries. This girl was part of a group of about 8 teenagers in an Urban precinct. This illegal caucusing happened all over the state and Rove’s christian camper bubbas enabled it….WHY ?
Because Hillary Clinton is the first candidate in a long time who really could’ve brought the Republic back into the Tent.

*** EXPOSE THE FRAUD. OBAMA IS A FASCIST AND UNFIT FOR POTUS ***

 
 
 

Comment by barbara | 2008-08-21 18:30:42

*BREAKING* Lawsuit Being Filed Today in Philadelphia *MEDIA ALERT* [Update]
August 21, 2008 · 56 Comments
I have just received word that a lawsuit will be filed today in Federal Court challenging Barack Obama’s qualifications to be President.

I am told that ALL MEDIA should report to the U.S. District Courthouse in Philadelphia in approximately one hour.

US District Court, Eastern District of PA
601 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19106-1797
Ph: 215-597-7704

It is currently 3:30 PM EST.

UPDATE: The motion will be for an emergency temporary restraining order prohibiting Obama from running for president, and enjoining the DNC from nominating Obama as the Democratic presidential candidate.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: barry soetoro, lawsuit, obama

Comment by Cixelsyd | 2008-08-21 19:23:10

ahem…

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html

In June, the Obama campaign released a digitally scanned image of his birth certificate to quell speculative charges that he might not be a natural-born citizen. But the image prompted more blog-based skepticism about the document’s authenticity. And recently, author Jerome Corsi, whose book attacks Obama, said in a TV interview that the birth certificate the campaign has is “fake.”

We beg to differ. FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship. Claims that the document lacks a raised seal or a signature are false. We have posted high-resolution photographs of the document as “supporting documents” to this article. Our conclusion: Obama was born in the U.S.A. just as he has always said.

Comment by catherine | 2008-08-21 19:54:33

How interesting that this appears right after Obama’s return from Hawaii…oh and is’nt Factcheck.org owned by Annenberg?

Hmm, sounds like a conflict of interest. The American people have a right to demand that the original bc be provided to federal electoral authorities as proof and NOT to an organization that
is involved in a current controversy re some sealed documents detailing its involvement with Obama, Ayers and ACORN.

 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-08-22 06:20:53

Ehemm….Cixelsyd….This aint’ just about the COLB which aint’ the same thing as a Birth Certificate….
Check out the Questions….And currently in America It is still LEGAL to ask Questions.
Barry has a hard time answering the most simple questions….The kind on your average job application.

 
 

Comment by Kelvin hearts PUMAs | 2008-08-21 19:27:08

Per Factcheck.org. Obama keeps a certified copy of his birth certificate at his campaign HQ. They have photos of the certified document as well. I guess this kills that eligibility lawsuit, huh?

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html

DaliyKos is running it too:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/8/21/181318/079/418/572147

Comment by Katmoon | 2008-08-21 19:31:50

I don’t know, I would think the courts like to have a hard copy, but that’s just my opinion. If the law suit goes thru, all he has to do is bring it in/ or have another certified one sent. Not sure what the court would decide.

Comment by Katmoon | 2008-08-21 19:34:16

Should have added, not sure if the state requires a copy in the courtroom is what I am saying, if the case is heard. Don’t know if a court considers FactCheck an expert for this, or if the attorneys would have a problem with it.

Comment by Cixelsyd | 2008-08-21 19:38:46

This might be a good time to discuss “burden of proof.” As in, it is the burden of the party filing the lawsuit to produce competent evidence to prove their case. Accusations aren’t enough.

Comment by Katmoon | 2008-08-21 19:45:09

Cixel,

You could be right, I don’t know exactly what type of case it is that is being filed, so there in lies who has the burden, like you said.

Comment by Cixelsyd | 2008-08-21 19:50:28

The party seeking the injunction ALWAYS hs the burden. If all they have is accusations and speculation, the injunction will be denied.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Hillary'sSimplytheBest | 2008-08-21 19:37:15

Factcheck.org has a conflict of interest in covering Barack Obama because they are owned by The Annenberg Foundation.

 

Comment by Dr. Kate | 2008-08-21 19:42:05

Factcheck.org has a conflict of interest: Obama, Acorn and the Anneburg Challenge.

its another fake certificate, and they will have to produce it again at trial. ha ha

 

Comment by simanov | 2008-08-21 20:12:44

Bullshit, the shadow on the certificate is conveniently placed to hide the fact that the embossed seal is not there in the wide shot. The close up of the seal was taken from another COLB.

Comment by simanov | 2008-08-21 20:33:35

And a flash wasn’t used to not dig into the shadow.

 

Comment by Zee | 2008-08-22 01:12:30

Oh, yeah, hold the BC at an angle so nothing can be seen on it, then have little closeups.

Why not just one GOOD shot of the certificate?

Nice try!

 
 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-08-22 06:23:58

Kevin, This is about Discovery Motions. In the filing of the law suit Obama will be required to produce documents for discovery and these are extensive and routine. Obama will have to convince a judge why He shouldn’t have to produce these in a hearing. This will be interesting.

Comment by Kevin | 2008-08-22 06:28:29

wca
its kelvin
not kevin
that would be me
and how is the mildly facist state of Texas this fine morning?

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-08-22 07:31:37

Sorry kevin….TYPO OOPS ! didn’t mean to offend as you are one o’ favorite commenters….scuse’
The mildly Fascist state of Texas has gotten plenty o’ rain and is now returning to it’s heat index that is biblical in hellishness….chuckle…
How’s the weather in your backyard ?
Gotta love that Lawyer Berg….chuckle….

*** DISCOVERY IS A BITCH….BARRY….***

 
 

Comment by Kelvin Hearts PUMAs | 2008-08-22 13:44:45

Somehow I doubt that. Why should he produce anything? To satisfy you PUMAs. He’s a federal employee. He just didn’t walk off of the street and ran for president. All his identification and citizenship information is on file and has been documented. The first thing you do as a presidential candidate is verify your citizenship to determine eligibility. Per Article 2 of US Constitution eligibility must be proven prior to him running.
http://www.2008electionprocon.org/pdf/USConstitution_Article2.pdf
http://www.2008electionprocon.org/howtopresident.htm#constitution
Also, Obama practiced constitutional law. He himself would know that he would not get away with cheating the system. This case will be thrown out and the lawyer presenting the case should be disbarred.

 
 

Comment by Bigtime | 2008-08-22 06:38:50

Any credible links? One owned by Annenberg and the other hate site is not trust worthy either.

Nobama!!

 
 
 

Comment by insix | 2008-08-21 18:30:59

HAHAHA So it begins! I thought it was going to start after BO is Nominated! I guess MAC could not help himself!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjC2AlWy6CI

Comment by jadwiga | 2008-08-21 18:57:10

Thanks to TexasDarlin’ and other’s extraordinary work and research into his elegibility. God bless them.

 

Comment by yttik | 2008-08-21 19:14:40

ROFL! Good one, McCain. I guess old age and treachery really does beat youth and beauty every time.

Bad move, Obama. If I were you, I would have avoided any mention of houses or mansions.

 
 

Comment by Northwest rain | 2008-08-21 18:31:01

The caucus experience HARDENED my determination never to vote for Obama/Soetoro.

The Obama thugs are vicious — we do not want that sort of authoritarian monster let loose in America.

Comment by Steve1 | 2008-08-21 19:45:03

News is reporting that two McCain campaign offices, Co. & NH, were mailed envelopes containing white powder substance…Would not put it pass it-that the Soetoro, AKA Obama wannabe thugs are at it again. This is a script directly out of training manuels from Robert Mugabe thug supporters from Zimbabwe!

 
 

Comment by PewL | 2008-08-21 18:33:13

Sorry off Topic again

Mccains office receives two envelopes with white powder substance..

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/08/21/mccain-office-receives-envelope-with-white-powder-threat/

Comment by Irish1139 | 2008-08-21 18:44:28

Gee, can we guess who sent those envelopes with the white powder.

I just hope the powder was benign.

 

Comment by That's above my pay grade Obambi | 2008-08-21 19:07:39

Is Obambi’s FRIEND Ayers up to old ways yet again, would not surprise me at all. Perhaps Ayers has progressed from BOMBS to WHITE POWDER.

Comment by Hillary Harridan | 2008-08-21 19:38:12

Obama and Ayers have been into white powder since the 70’s.

Comment by jwrjr | 2008-08-21 22:28:44

Obama wouldn’t be mailing that white powder … unless he plans to report the McCain offices to Drug Enforcement authorities.

 
 
 
 

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn Amerikkka Wright | 2008-08-21 18:34:28

hmm having posting difficulty with youtube videos.

 

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn Amerikkka Wright | 2008-08-21 18:37:54

Obama put out an add criticizing McCain for not stating how many houses he and cindy own. MacDaddy just struck back:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjC2AlWy6CI

Looks like the punking from Saddleback is going to continue.

Score another one from Big Mac.

 

Comment by btintaos | 2008-08-21 18:39:18

I remember Hillary dropping hints about this toward the end of the primaries. Remember the times she’d mention that Obama tended to win caucuses and she won primaries? I didn’t take them as a hints at the time, but in retrospect that’s what they were.

Off topic, but has anyone been watching CNN? It’s like they snapped out of a deep sleep. Suddenly, they’re airing Obama’s laundry including; Annenberg, Obama’s real estate deal, Rezko, and suggesting that Obama NEEDS Hillary now. It’s so surreal. Good, but surreal.

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn Amerikkka Wright | 2008-08-21 18:42:46

If they pressure Hillary into joining the bottom of the ticket she is screwed.

They will claim its her negatives that cost him the election.

DON’T DO IT HILL!!

LET HIM SINK OR SWIM ON HIS OWN MERITS!

Comment by PewL | 2008-08-21 19:01:15

She’s too good for the bottom of any ticket..I can’t see her ever taking the VP job….Don’t count out the Clinton’s..

Top of the Ticket or Nothing

 

Comment by Khan Krum | 2008-08-21 19:49:48

Absolutely. He’s mortally wounded already — what do you think he’ll be like in a month or two? That abortion issue will kill him with Middle America alone. Hillary should wait until 2012.

 

Comment by politicsnootch | 2008-08-21 19:55:27

funny comedian on youtube making fun of the Democrats choices this year, and Obama’s VP pick:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5GaaD2-Whs

 
 

Comment by insix | 2008-08-21 18:42:53

The house of cards is falling!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Comment by vinnie | 2008-08-21 18:51:36

CNN is still infotainment…don’t believe it. It’s all about ratings because FOX will sweep if they air the nasty dirty stuff…no one wants to see Wolf Blitzer be Barry’s cheerleader everyday.

 

Comment by Solidarity | 2008-08-21 18:51:41

I will never be able to thank you for what you all have done here. I am a grown man and I am almost overwhelmed with emotion to the point of tears. Thank you all.

 

Comment by simanov | 2008-08-21 18:59:33

Panic and desperation are the only explanation, serves them right. I think one of the beneficiaries of this campaign is Fox news. For years millions of people bought into the rest of the media’s attacks, only to discover now, that although leaning to the right, you can still get more balanced information there.

 

Comment by Bugs Bunny | 2008-08-21 19:00:22

it is most likely because they are so in the tank that they see it as the only remote chance obamprah has.
maybe viewership is down.

 

Comment by sowsear | 2008-08-21 19:12:13

But Fox, for some reason, declined to run the $2.8 million ad on about Ayres????

Comment by csuzeq | 2008-08-21 22:07:39

Something bigger up their sleeves?

 
 

Comment by rw | 2008-08-21 19:15:26

Nice way CNN worked to place the inexperienced Obama on top of the ticket. Now they see he has a snow ball in-his-place-in hell chance of winning the general so they are going to manipulate to pressure for Hillary to take second place…I don’t think so.

I hope this list of case histories gets compiled and sent to some investigative government against voter fraud office. Perhaps also to some citizen rights group, to a publisher, as a chain email so the world sees what happened in the US, etc.

Comment by Kelvin hearts PUMAs | 2008-08-21 19:44:45

Now it’s CNN’s fault that Hillary lost? You guys are really reaching now.

Comment by Steve1 | 2008-08-21 19:48:50

Kevin-Sip some more Kool-aid!

 

Comment by OBSP | 2008-08-21 19:54:30

No it’s not the media fault, but they did hurt her. It was the Jessie Jackson rule where the delegates were awarded based on appeasing his black ass. There is no way 30,000 people in Iowa should determine the POTUS, which under the dem system it basically does.
I smell troll and it’s kind of stink, go shower and go to bed. You know it’s past your bed time.

 
 

Comment by CJ | 2008-08-21 20:38:39

I saw Hardball tonight and the panelists were saying that the only way Obama can bring in Hillary supporters is for Hillary to go out and really stump for him. I was so pissed. Why does Hillary always have to carry the ball for this freak? She’s done enough!

Obama doesn’t know what it is like to run a campaign where there is opposition. He is used to his Chicago tactics taking care of his opponent. This is new ground for him so he has to lie, cheat and steal. Hence the caucaus fraud. I know he has peeps in the Diebold organization too. God only knows what November is going to look like.

Comment by Ferdberfle | 2008-08-21 20:43:38

This situation begs the question: If Obama needs her to win, then perhaps she should be on top of the ticket. She wouldn’t need him.

Comment by catherine | 2008-08-21 21:28:27

And somebody in the DNC leadership should have figured that out a longggggggggggggggg time ago!

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-08-21 21:31:56

amen Catherine!

 
 
 

Comment by karen for Clinton | 2008-08-21 21:14:49

Ob has Joe Andrew at Diebold. He was a chairman of the DNC in the past. He originally came out for Clinton then switched to ob and went on CNN to promote him by spewing constant lies. Right after he switched to Ob, Joe got a big job at Diebold.

It made me shiver.

Comment by Zee | 2008-08-22 01:20:25

omfg.

I wonder if Mark Crispin Miller will quit huffing the hopium and cover this? And cover this caucus info?

At least we have some of the heavy hitters of electoral fraud research….Paul Lusiak, for one.

And thank you, Dr. Long, for posting this story.

 
 
 
 

Comment by csuzeq | 2008-08-21 20:16:33

They still put a positive spin on things for Obiedumba. Then the pundits defend him. My hope is that people’s ears perk up and then they hit the internet for more info!

When Rezko was mentioned during a debate by Hillary, I had no idea what that was about. I started reading the trial in the Chicago papers and it just didn;t smell right and made Obielyin look like a liar and player. It just went downhill by then. With Osohighonmyselfa that is how it goes, one thing leads to another, to another, to another and so on. Then you know you will never vote for him.

Definitely, I do believe Hillary was giving hints throughout the primary and Bill most definitely did in that interview he did recently.

As for CNN changing their coverage a bit, it is building and I predict they will slaughter Ostupidfraud as soon as the convention is finished next week!

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn Amerikkka Wright | 2008-08-21 20:20:44

Yeah I actually started reading up about the candidates at that debate where Hillary mentioned Rezko.

If i hadn’t watched it i would never have even thought to look it up.

I am sure a lot of the veiwing public said rezko huh? and promptly forgot it.

The MSM has failed to do its job of adequatley covering this and oh so many other lovely stories about the Fauxbama.

I imagine in my happy view of the world that they realized that they had two months after the Selection and are holding all the good stuff for when a lot more people are actually tuned in.

 
 
 

Comment by Peniel | 2008-08-21 18:41:54

All the time I was doing my primary vs caucus research, I had one head-shaking moment after another.

Now, I’m reading all the stories of caucus fraud and irregularities … and I’m having one head-shaking moment after another.

Unbelievable!

Lynette, you’ve done a superb job!
— peniel cronin

Comment by Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy | 2008-08-21 18:49:33

Hey! Aren’t you the one who did the definitive work on the primary/caucus injustices?? If so, your work is FANTASTIC (again, if not disturbing).

Wow - two great researchers in one place!! Amazing!

Comment by Peniel | 2008-08-21 19:23:46

Yes. Dr. Long has included my final report under “Caucus Statistics”. It is chock-full of new info throughout.

And I’ll tell you, the statistics on primary vs caucus - plus now the documented stories of irregularities and outright fraud have GOT to get the eye of the superdelegates.

If they turn a blind eye to so much info … then hopefully the Democratic base will hold each of them responsible - by remembering when that superdelegate comes up for election (if applicable).

One thing for sure, Howard Dean has got to go!!! What a disservice he has done to our Party and to Hillary.

btw Reverend Amy, you’re actually irreverent in a wonderful way!
— peniel cronin

Comment by Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy | 2008-08-21 19:35:44

Why, thank ya!! That is a great compliment coming from you!

The final report you did is really amazing. I encourage everyone to go take a look at it.

I sure do hope this info gets to the appropriate people. It has been incredibly frustrating that there is so much documentation to back up the ways by which Obama got where he is. The DNC has definitely turned a blind eye and deaf ear to the evidence. It just boggles the mind…

I cannot believe I was ever happy that Howard Dean was going to be the Chairman. That is a faint memory. How can someone do so much damage in such a short time??

In any event, thank you (and Dr. Long) for the work you have done in order that truth will out. Well done!

 

Comment by pm317 | 2008-08-21 20:41:38

Thank you for documenting all the stats about caucus versus primary.

 

Comment by Zee | 2008-08-22 01:35:15

Thank you Peniel, also!

 
 
 
 

Comment by Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy | 2008-08-21 18:44:45

Dr. Long, this is just incredibly disturbing. That the will of the people has been so subverted during this Primary season is just plain shocking. I think we all felt caucuses were not great, but what you have reported (great website, too, btw) is criminal, is it not? And if it IS, how does this info get out to get proceedings started? At the very LEAST, this info needs to be in every newpaper across the land…

Excellent work…

 

Comment by athena | 2008-08-21 18:44:47

Yep saw agression in my Precinct in Dallas. ALso Obama supporters tried to sign in voters during the primary for the caucus taking place later in the evening. That is a HUGE No-No!

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-08-22 06:30:31

Athena….OakCliff was a disaster…..

 
 

Comment by vinnie | 2008-08-21 18:48:39

I attended 4 caucuses in Colorado and each one got worse and worse in terms of organization. Although I didn’t experience anything other than verbal intimidation and rudeness, there were others who had stories to tell. I’m forever disgusted and if anyone had told me this would happen amongst Democrats, I would have said they were crazy. Live and learn as they say. Barry will never get my vote because I have a thing against cheaters.

Comment by AF catfish | 2008-08-21 18:56:19

Who was doing the verbal intimidation - were they young people? And were they insulting Hillary? Were they African American?

 
 

Comment by JohninCA | 2008-08-21 18:49:29

The attack by the O team just lets McCain counter with Rezko ads, like he should have been doing anyway.

The other side will soon learn that when Republicans get attacked, they generally don’t go off wind surfing.

 

Comment by JohninCA | 2008-08-21 18:52:40

My apologies for the off topic comment; should have stayed on the subject of Obama’s young, well indoctrinated Red Guards.

 

Comment by OBSP | 2008-08-21 19:01:31

Rookie mistake, how could he even mention a house. Since a lot of republican and indy’s did not pay attention to the primary races and knew nothing about Dirty Tony, he handed him that opening on a siver platter.
Also according to Politico, McCain does not own the homes, his wife does. McCain should have known that and did a Kerry. Like Kerry, he and his wife did not file jointly and he should have said, I don’t own homes, my rich wife does.

Comment by RepublicanChick | 2008-08-21 22:23:46

After the Keating 5 scandal, the McCains had to separate the holdings because of Cindy McCain’s business interests.

Comment by Just Wondering | 2008-08-21 22:54:22

Did that include Cindy and her father’s $359,100 investment in Keating’s shopping center project?

And what about Keating & Associates’ “perfectly legal” $112,000 contribution to John’s campaign fund? I suppose that had already been spent getting John reelected. Just water under the bridge, or over the dam, or whatever…

Comment by RepublicanChick | 2008-08-21 23:23:14

In the end, McCain was cleared by the Senate Ethics Committee of acting improperly or violating any law or Senate rule, but was mildly rebuked for exercising “poor judgment”.

It was obviously poor decision on his part, but I think Obama runs the risk of having his own “issues” rising up. If you are involved with shady people, it will eventually bite you in the butt.

We await to see the same thing regarding Senator Obama’s dealings with Tony Rezko, CAC, Acorn, and whatever else is waiting to surface.

As for your conclusion below that Obama doesn’t have it in his DNA to go negative, I think you’re obviously a kool aid drinker.

Obama and his minions treatment of Hillary during the primaries was horrific. He should be grateful she’s even speaking to him at this point. He most certainly doesn’t deserve any generosity.

 
 
 
 

Comment by Just Wondering | 2008-08-21 23:02:41

Alas, the consensus is that Obama will have a harder time attacking John, because “personal attacks just aren’t in Barack Obama’s DNA”. I’m afraid that really does put Obama at a decided disadvantage when it comes to mud-and-shit-slinging.

Since the republicans are obviously going to go that route pedal-to-the-metal, he’ll probably need to allow that sort of war to be waged through surrogates.

A hard-hitting VP would be very helpful.

Of course, the other killer combo would be Obama and Clinton together on the ticket. Hillary is tough. And it wouldn’t play very well if the McCain campaign was forced to turn their smear machine on Hillary.

I won’t be caught totally unawares if that turned out to the the surprise democratic strategy to deal with all the lies.

 
 

Comment by blog force one | 2008-08-21 18:50:26

the huge amt of cash funnelled thru acorn by the obama campaign for “sound systems” totalling over 600 tousand dollars is very suspicious and it is my belief that these funds were then channeled to john edward’s atty fred Baron for use in thr Reille Hunter lovechild coverup. Fred baron is also a major Obama fundraiser and John Edwards has a very close relationship with Acorn! follow the money!

Comment by Bigtime | 2008-08-22 06:54:00

Fishy does not begin to describe the smell coming from all the money The One has run thru ACORN.

Nobama!!

 
 

Comment by pumapower | 2008-08-21 18:52:04

Note that the only caucus state that Hillary won was Nevada, and this was because she was able to mobilize the service union in time to take a caucus win. However despite her caucus win, she did not claim delegate lead in that state. So in essense, she ‘lost’ the only caucus state she won.

Obama is NOT democratically elected. Obama, his supporters and DNC leaders, gamed the primary to select him as the nominee.

 

Comment by AF catfish | 2008-08-21 18:52:49

Would love to hear more about “group dynamics”:

What I saw was at least 3 trained group agitators — Since my MA is in group dynamics and group facilitation I recognized when someone is using techniques that I have been trained in.