RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Palin’s Speech A Home Run For Most

sarah.jpgDrum Roll, please….. Governor Sarah hit a homerun! She never yielded the floor for one minute. At times she was snarky, took a few hits at Obama and just kept the crowd at the Republican National Convention on their feet. As for me, I was doing a happy dance bruised ribs and all! Here is what the blogs and news sites are saying about the the bulldog herself! And she is a bulldog, tough strong and like you or me.

Hockey Mom delivers….from MACLEANSCA.blog. More from them.

She was combative and she was funny — sometimes snarky — and the crowd here clung to every single word. I can’t help but think she’s a plus on the ticket. And I can’t get over how much she looks like Tina Fey.

“I love those hockey Moms. You know, they say, the difference between a hockey Mom and a pitbull?… Lipstick!

She delivered her big line perfectly:

“Since our opponents look down on that experience let me explain to them what the job (mayor of her hometown) involves. It’s kind of like being a community organizer… except with actual responsibility.”

The opinion on this blog located in Canada is just this:

Maybe I’m the only reporter in Canada to think this, and maybe it’s because I’m here in the Republican bubble, but I think this pick brings a lot of pluses to the ticket — mobilizing the pro-life and Christian base at a time when Obama was enjoying an “enthusiasm” edge in on-the-ground organizing; rejeuvenating the ticket that looked like an old white guy; and piquing the interest of women… I’ll be surprised if they get a lot of the hard-core Hillary voters — they’re too far apart on the issues, but after watching this confident and combative speech, and seeing the hearty endorsement from the security uber-hawks like Giuliani, I think a lot of independent women are going to tune in to hear more from Palin.

“>Bolson on… Observations and opinion on “We the People…” gives us highlights of the convention throughout the evening, It is his headline about Governor Sarah Palin, that takes your breath away.

Sarah takes aim and comes out guns blazing!

He continues to express his true and unadulterated feelings about The Speech,

In what was clearly the most anticipated political speech this year–and perhaps in decades–Alaska’s Gov. Sarah Palin took center stage, stepped up to the plate, and knocked one of out the ballpark. We’re talking out of the park and across the street and into the woods. Joe Biden must have had dry mouth and pangs of personal and professional jealousy while watching Palin’s performance.

She was poised, powerful, on point, at times a pitbull with lipstick, and definitely ready for prime time. She was, the Democrats worst fear come true. Authoritative but seemingly approachable. Fiery but obviously friendly. Tough but too classy to swim and swirl around in the muck, mud, and the mire that the mainstream media loves to wallow and whine in.

Bolson felt the following quotes from Governor Palin’s speech were perhaps the best and most memorable,

About her experience: “I was mayor of my hometown. And since our opponents in this presidential election seem to look down on that experience, let me explain to them what the job involves. I guess a small-town mayor is sort of like a ‘community organizer,’ except that you have actual responsibilities.”

About her reason for running for vice president: “I’m not a member of the permanent political establishment. And I’ve learned quickly, these past few days, that if you’re not a member in good standing of the Washington elite, then some in the media consider a candidate unqualified for that reason alone. But here’s a little news flash for all those reporters and commentators: I’m not going to Washington to seek their good opinion - I’m going to Washington to serve the people of this country.”

About her running mate, Sen. McCain: “Here’s how I look at the choice Americans face in this election. In politics, there are some candidates who use change to promote their careers. And then there are those, like John McCain, who use their careers to promote change.”

The Moderate Voice had this to say about McCain first,

John McCain just found his new attack dog, and I think we’ll all want to get bitten.

The Voice gives us an interesting perspective on Governor Palin:

Yet when Palin savages Obama as an unaccomplished community organizer, it’s like watching Reese Witherspoon in “Legally Blonde” take down her smug, self-satisfied ex-boyfriend in law school. How can you be mad at a woman who says the only difference between hockey moms like herself and pit bulls is “lipstick”?

Michael Crowley at The Stump wasn’t very generous towards Governor Palin and had this to say. He actually found some of her criticisms toward Obama over the top. (I thought they were appropriate and hitting at Obama’s soft spot.) Here is what Michael said,

I completely misjudged how negative she would be. Her lines about Obama were brutally cutting and possibly over the top in places. But she’s a far better messenger than an angry white man. (Note, by the way, how both Rudy and Huckabee employed a tone that was more bemused than angry. That’s the modern GOP’s favorite trick–comedic ridicule in place of outright nastiness.)

I disagree of course I think she was truly positive in most parts but hard hitting on Obama, he deserved it though after the bashing he and his surrogates gave Governor Palin all week.

The Trail has reactions from women around the country.

From Michigan,

Linda Beebe, 59, a voter in Michigan, had been leaning toward Sen. Barack Obama before Palin’s speech on Wednesday night. Before the Alaska governor had even finished speaking, though, Beebe had changed her mind.

“Could we drop off McCain and just have her?” Beebe said in a telephone interview. “She’s talking about the things that concern myself and people I know. I know there’s a big world out there, but if we’re not healthy at home, how can we help outside home? She sounds pretty good.”

There is this from Connecticut. I have to disagree with the assessment, I didn’t find her smug, I find her very genuine. She appears to be the type of woman who will not genuflect to the aristocracy. She is independent, moves to the beat of her own drummer!

Laura Bates, 45, of Madison, Conn., the reaction was more muted. “She gives a good speech, and she’s talking to the people in her audience — but she seems antagonistic, and I’m not impressed,” said Bates, who supported Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton in the primaries. “I’d say it’s about 100 percent I’d vote for Obama at this point. She hasn’t really said anything constructive … and she’s been a little negative and smug.”

And from my home state of Massachusetts….this woman knew she was voting for the McCain ticket beforehand.

After supporting Clinton in the primary, Lang said, she had been undecided until last week.
“Today I’m voting for McCain,” Lang said. “I think it’s a smart move for him to pick a woman, because all of us who have voted for Hillary Clinton have no one to vote for.”

In Virginia, Bridget Brophy played hostess to four members of the Network of Enlightened Women, a conservative women’s book club at the college. All were eager to hear from Palin after nearly a week of news reports that had shaped their first impressions. Three of the women were outspoken and described what they liked.

Lauren Brown, a third-year law student, said: “The ethics reform bill was one of her first goals. That impressed me.”

“I kind of liked her better because she was supportive of her daughter,” said junior Melissa Barron, as she chomped on double-chocolate chip cookies. “She has a really strong family.”

“I feel like she’s just made of something really strong,” Brophy said.

Then there is this from inside Xcel Energy Center,

When Palin finally did make her introduction, Nagel approved of what she saw — and heard. Nagel once coached a high school speech and debate team, and she liked how Palin defended her family without sounding defensive. She stood up on her red folding chair at the end of Palin’s speech and leaned in to take a picture. “She started with the family and then moved on, just like everybody should do,” Nagel shouted above the roar of the crowd. “She’s a woman, and she showed she’s tough. She attacked Obama. She touched on all the issues. We love her.”

Said Cassis, a state senator from suburban Detroit: “This is history. The Democrats had a chance to put a woman on the ticket, and they punted. Not us. [Palin] is elevating women just by her presence. I will always remember this.”

And finally from Indiana we had several residents weigh-in. Here is more on that:

But Sue Struss, 48, expressed appreciation of Palin’s family values. “She has a family, her husband has two jobs — they’re clearly American people, not some rich people,” said Struss, a lifelong Whiting resident and the manager of the bar, which is adorned by an American flag in twinkling lights, wood paneling, and Bud and Miller pendants.

But Sue Struss, 48, expressed appreciation of Palin’s family values.

“She has a family, her husband has two jobs — they’re clearly American people, not some rich people,” said Struss, a lifelong Whiting resident and the manager of the bar, which is adorned by an American flag in twinkling lights, wood paneling, and Bud and Miller pendants.

John Lawson, 44, a chemical engineer at BP, said working-class Whiting residents are torn between the traditional Democratic support of labor and the traditional values represented by Palin. “She’s facing the same challenges as a lot of Americans — a pregnant daughter, a disabled son, balancing work and family,” he said.

Many residents of the little town were more enthralled with the Cubs game, only one bar was watching the convention. One military veteran weighed-in on the speech.

Charles White, 48, an out-of-work house painter who is a military veteran, said he thought the speech was uninspiring and showed hopelessness among Republicans. “I go by body language, and if you feel you have a good running mate, you’re going to be pumped up,” he said of McCain. “McCain just chose her because she’s a pretty face, and none of the men would go with him because they know he’s going to lose.”

This is a sentiment I have seen served up by veterans over the years. They haven’t accepted that women serve our country too in combat and on Naval ships. I disagree with him all together. Governor Palin hit a home run last night, there is no doubt. I can’t wait to see her sweep Biden off the stage in debates!

It is really an upside year. I have always viewed the Republican Party as being the totally sexist party. That just isn’t so this year. Democrats are miring in their sexist muck!

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post157 Comments »

Comment by Kelvin Hearts PUMAs | 2008-09-04 22:10:15

It was a good speech… for neocons. And maybe a few hundred or so PUMAs. I gotta go. Good night now….

Comment by whoframedrudy | 2008-09-04 22:23:48

“And maybe a few hundred or so PUMAs.”

What was the margin in Florida in 2000? Was it 50 votes or 60?

Comment by Paul F. Villarreal | 2008-09-04 23:19:27

Here’s another young, female PUMA with an M.D. talking about Palin’s speech and what Palin means to her and America:

‘Hot, smart women LOVE Sarah Palin:’
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpI_5elcJtQ

Remember the ‘old, unattractive women’ like Clinton?

That’s gone.

This woman is all Palin, and she is a lifetime Dem, AND and M.D., AND a Playboy model.

You’re toast Obama. It is OVER.

Another video my brother did — he took the smackdown Buchanan gave Chris Matthews, wrapped it up with damning footage of Matthews ranting about HRC, and then added his own hilarious commentary. Check it out:

‘Is Chris Matthew’s Sexist? Pat Buchanan OWNS Matthews in explosive showdown!!’
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkg3A_j6itU

Ha ha ha. Matthews got PUNKED!

We’re winning against the forces of sexism. YES!

Comment by mimi | 2008-09-04 23:29:00

OT

I just heard a man named Jon Meacham say on Charlie Rose that he only thinks 3 of Hillary’s female supporters will vote for McCain because of Palin and if he found them he would buy them lunch.

I say we need to contact him at

charlierose@pbs.org

Just to let him know that there a whole lot of hungry women who could use a nice lunch.

I’m tired of these people on air trying to play down the amount of Hillary’s supporters who will be voting for McCain. I already sent my email. Whatd’ya say PUMAS, let’s break this guy’s bank.

Comment by Paul F. Villarreal | 2008-09-05 00:17:53

Meacham is a moron, and if I recall correctly, he’s tied up with Newsweek, which is in bed with MSNBC.

He’s biased, eff him.

Comment by MaryPat | 2008-09-05 02:53:28

Right, Paul. Meacham is the big-cheese editor at Newsweek, which just last week published one of the most outrageous articles of the campaign–a column by Jacob Weisberg which argued that if Obama loses, it will be ALL because of racism. Period.

And Michael Crowley is such a little wuss. First of all, he looks all of 16 years old. And secondly, this is a political campaign, not a church social. If Obama can’t stand the heat–and Sarah sure is packin’ it–he should get out of the kitchen. I’d rather have Sarah staring down Ahmadinejad than that whiner Barry any day–she impresses me as a tough cookie. All Mahmoud would have to do is ridicule the color of Barry’s tie and he’d be running off to regroup behind one of those starifoam Greek columns.

 
 

Comment by navyvet48 | 2008-09-05 04:30:24

I e-mailed Charlie Rose three Clinton supporters who are voting for McCain/Palin….all women! He will find them now!

Comment by wodiej | 2008-09-05 05:01:17

I just e-mailed him too. what an ass….

 
 
 

Comment by elise | 2008-09-05 00:12:55

That’s amazing, Paul and thank you so much for posting it. How I wish someone in the Democratic Party had done that for Hillary.

Comment by Paul F. Villarreal | 2008-09-05 00:16:59

Thanks, Elise.

I wish it had been done for Hillary, too.

But, we won’t let it happen to two women in the same election.

;)

 
 

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-09-05 01:17:47

Excellent article from Gerard Baker writing for the Times Online (UK.)

From The Times
September 5, 2008
Sarah Palin: it’s go west, towards the future of conservatism
Her thrilling convention speech showed that the Governor of Alaska is a force to reckoned with. But she might be more than that
Gerard Baker

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/gerard_baker/article4677799.ece?Submitted=true

The best line I heard about Sarah Palin during the frenzied orgy of chauvinist condescension and gutter-crawling journalistic intrusion that greeted her nomination for vice-president a week ago came from a correspondent who knows a thing or two about Alaska.

“What’s the difference between Sarah Palin and Barack Obama?”

“One is a well turned-out, good-looking, and let’s be honest, pretty sexy piece of eye-candy.

“The other kills her own food.”

Comment by dpvegas | 2008-09-05 04:56:38

McCain’s trump card…and it’s brilliant!

She’s real, she’s not the usual, run-of-the-mill pol, whose whole life has been one election after the other. She’s gone from the PTA to the VP, and she’s got a union husband, unpapered at that, to boot.

She doesn’t have to read reams of research to try to guess at what working people are like. She is one.

And with her, the Republicans have yet again taken something away from the Democratic Party–they’re now the party that supports women. And they’re now brazenly opposed to mysogony (forgive my spelling, it’s late and I’m actually ticked).

Way to go Dean, Pelosi, Reid, Brazille, and all you other elitist boors in what used to be the working people’s party, my party.

 
 
 
 

Comment by Fritz | 2008-09-04 22:52:12

Yeah really Kelvin? Aw what a shame! OK good night! LMAO

[If this doesn't prove Obamajugend are all underage I don't know what does haha.]

 

Comment by Seattle Moss | 2008-09-05 01:12:43

Kelvin
Post and run..
You’re a wimp!!

 
 

Comment by MrMike | 2008-09-04 22:10:40

Said Cassis, a state senator from suburban Detroit: “This is history. The Democrats had a chance to put a woman on the ticket, and they punted. Not us. [Palin] is elevating women just by her presence. I will always remember this.”

Says it all doesn’t it?

Comment by red_sleeves | 2008-09-04 23:58:50

This is pretty nasty.

http://downspalin.blogspot.com/

I don’t understand how a normal person could put so much time and effort into being a complete and total asshole.

Comment by Ivory Bill Woodpecker | 2008-09-05 02:36:58

Even more than Obama’s own inadequacies, his asshole supporters like that “downspalin” sumbitch are why I will not vote for Plastic Jesus.

 
 
 

Comment by fred | 2008-09-04 22:18:25

John McCain earned the right to lead this country, he’s served it almost died for it. He has my support. Why would I bypass a man who have suffered and fought for this country for a gawd damn American hater , done nothing for country , but all for self Barack Obama……Hell NO

Comment by Barack Obama is Tom Cruise's Favorite Bitch | 2008-09-04 22:54:27

Yeah that really profiles it.

 
 

Comment by katmandu | 2008-09-04 22:20:31

Back to back home runs. The closing minute was the most inspiring McCain I’ve ever seen.

Comment by 30yrdem-not any more | 2008-09-04 22:43:18

There is a McCain video that I think shows the real McCain, I have tried to catch him on the stump where he takes questions, here is the video…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-QYIP7o2-A&feature=user

 

Comment by joe | 2008-09-04 22:57:51

Yah, that was very unusual for McCain. Great ending. He also went after the GOP at its own convention!!! BHO would not go after his party in his own neighborhood, let alone take on the corruption in the entire national apparatus.

This one is over lady’s and gentleman. The BHO campaign has no outs here - if anyone can hypothesize one, let me know.

Also, hearing him actually tell the POW story almost had me in tears. He never does that and it is so powerfully effective. This is truly a great man of integrity and honor. There campaign was right — this isn’t about policies, it’s about personalities. The GOP wove a narrative of love and service to the country - and not just any country, but that great shining city on the hill which is the destination of all men who wish to be free.

I am extremely proud to be an American tonight. Thank god for people like John McCain!!

 

Comment by Shine My Shoes Barky | 2008-09-04 22:59:19

Yeah that was intense.

 

Comment by matchles | 2008-09-04 23:30:19

Yeah it was, too bad it took him an hour to get to it.

 

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-09-04 23:52:40

The end of McCain’s speech was like the coach addressing his team in the locker room before they go out on the field and win the Superbowl.

 
 

Comment by Beckley | 2008-09-04 22:21:53

Palin is far from perfect but she is an excellent pick. What a lady! McCain/Palin will have my vote, partly because I find the thought of an Obama presidency truly horrifying. I have cried tears of hope this week, the first tears I have ever shed over any election.

Comment by Shine My Shoes Barky | 2008-09-04 23:00:37

For once I’m not pissed at Diebold hehe!

Comment by Cath | 2008-09-05 00:15:07

Shine My Shoes Barky -

So, it’s OK to steal elections Diebold-style?

If that’s the attitude, I DO question your patriotism, whether you’re for McCain or Obama.

Comment by AnnieCarmel | 2008-09-05 00:29:27

I take it that goes for stolen primaries too…without Diebold?

 
 
 
 

Comment by georgia | 2008-09-04 22:23:29

 

Comment by Indyvoter | 2008-09-04 22:25:32

Palin’s great. A winning ticket in my view.

 

Comment by PhxNickD | 2008-09-04 22:27:57

I am ready to vote McCain - Palin ticket with no reservations. I need a Sarah bumper sticker to put over my Hillary ticket.

Comment by God Damn Michelle Obama | 2008-09-04 22:31:57

Me too. I will not vote for Tony Rezko, William Ayers, Michelle Hussein Obama, Reverend Jeremiah “God Damn AmeriKKKa” Wright and Donnie McClurkin.

 

Comment by Shine My Shoes Barky | 2008-09-04 23:01:36

Put ‘em side by side. Hill is still a hero.

Comment by Lochos Vestu | 2008-09-05 01:32:22

Exactly! How dare you replace Hillary with Palin? What a jerk!

HILLARY OVER PALIN, ANY DAY, ANY TIME, ALWAYS!!!

 
 

Comment by Marie | 2008-09-04 23:27:17

Looks like Obama will force Hillary to attack Sarah.
http://www.newsday.com/services/newspaper/printedition/thursday/nation/ny-usclin045828629sep04,0,4322864.story
I hope PUMAs can see through Obama’s dirty trick.
McCain/Palin 08 means Hillary 2012!

Comment by PewL | 2008-09-04 23:38:46

I hope Hillary says No its not My Job anymore…

Comment by Dan | 2008-09-05 00:04:07

Unfortunately, she can’t. She has to play the part of “the good soldier” for the Democratic Party if she wants a second chance at the brass ring in 2012. But she won’t do any more campaigning for Obama than she absolutely has to do.

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-09-05 01:19:42

I hope he’s reconsidering paying off her campaign debt.

 
 
 

Comment by Patti | 2008-09-04 23:52:33

Dontcha just love how they attack her, even when asking for her help.

 

Comment by yoman | 2008-09-05 01:30:39

HILL would be a MORON if she Campiagns for Obama, after what Ombots did to her and Bubba

 

Comment by C.S. | 2008-09-05 08:25:54

What I got from that article is that Senator Hillary Clinton is fine with the Democratic party as long as she knows her place and that place is campaigning for Soertoro/Obama.

And, that place is not about to change in 2012 unless something is done in 2008. We know that from the way the Democratic primary and convention was manipulated to shut Senator Clinton out. Just like the first Bush election, this one was messy and just like the 04 election, practice will make next time easier to hide. Unless a major shakeup occurs in the Democratic party immediately the Soertoro/Obama faction will keep control and become stronger and will probably have less trouble keeping Senator Clinton out in 2012 with or without an Soertoro/Obama win.

The idea of a Vice President Palin just might be that something to shake up the Democratic party because there is no other female candidate with Senator Clinton’s loyal support to fend off a Palin presidential run in 12 or 16. Because, as hard as it is to admit that women still haven’t attained equality, and that this election isn’t a referendum on the Bush presidency, gender bias is what the fight is about!

When two women from opposite parties receive the same treatment by one faction of the Democratic party that’s strong antidotal evidence that any research can quantify.

Don’t buy the “bait and switch”, this election the Soertoro/Obama faction of the Democratic party is still your foe and if you simply can’t vote for McCain/Palin please find a 3rd party and vote for their presidential candidate. The larger percentage third parties collectively receive the louder your message of disagreement.

 
 

Comment by Rolo | 2008-09-05 11:27:52

Ditto. I will enthusiastically vote for McCain.
Hillary is out of the race now. Concentrating on getting rid of Obama must now be the priority.

 
 

Comment by jwrjr | 2008-09-04 22:31:12

She doesn’t take herself too seriously. Refreshing. As opposed to Obama / Soetoro who does take himself too seriously.

 

Comment by jeanniejo | 2008-09-04 22:35:03

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/09/04/philip-j-berg-obama-lawsuit-update-obama-served-dnc-served-obama-not-qualified-to-be-president-update/

Philip J Berg Obama lawsuit, Update, Obama served, DNC served, Obama not qualified to be president, * Update *

Comment by PhxNickD | 2008-09-04 22:37:26

ok but why isn’t this stuff anywhere on the news? there has to be someone out there that would be interested in a story like this.

Comment by 30yrdem-not any more | 2008-09-04 22:56:41

Check out this site, he is in contact with the guy who brought the case….

look on the right for links in red.
http://www.americasright.com/

Comment by Marie | 2008-09-05 01:18:16

I’m really afraid this could be a set-up.
Remember the Rather-gate?
What if Obama’s handler AxelRove is setting a trap? Once they present a legit birth certificate, we won’t be able to attack anything anymore.

 
 
 

Comment by Shine My Shoes Barky | 2008-09-04 23:05:18

 
 

Comment by TwoTermObama | 2008-09-04 22:36:33

All I know is my pet wolf cried something awful throughout the whole speech. I thought it was just her abrasive, nasally Sally Fields speech, but he was really upset after having read this the day before:

Sarah Palin, the governor of Alaska and John McCain’s vice presidential pick, is an enthusiastic hunter who has proposed legislation and cash incentives to encourage aerial wolf gunning, the controversial practice of shooting wolves from an aircraft. Do people in Alaska really shoot wolves from planes?

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-09-04 22:41:50

So now because you have a sh@#y selectate in Obamasoretoro….you have to go after the state of Alaska??? Wow, so that’s what desperation looks like!! Obamasoretoro is losing BIG in NOvember. NObama in NOvember!

Comment by Fritz | 2008-09-04 22:50:45

But what oh what will all the O-teenz™ do with themselves? LOL

 
 

Comment by Ronnie & The Daytonas | 2008-09-04 22:44:14

That little TTO
He’s really lost his mind
Goosed out by a cheap suit
And those worn out lines
Listen how his gasket blows now
Listen to him WHINE
C’mon turn it off, wind it down, go to bed TTO

(TIme for bed, young man! It’s way past your bedtime! You want to be wide awake tomorrow for Uncle Sponge Bob, don’t you? You can have Daddy’s sex toys in bed if you want but now YOU MUST GO TO SLEEP!)

 

Comment by beebop | 2008-09-04 22:44:44

Can we get you a ticket on Air Alaska? I’d certainly pitch in a fiver or so just to shut you the hell up. Just sayin’ if anyone else is up for it, I’ll start a puma er …. kitty for one ticket for likes it both ways here …

Comment by Shine My Shoes Barky | 2008-09-04 23:08:15

 
 

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-09-05 00:10:47

Yep. Hunters shoot animals. I had my family donate to a fund that would stop this practice of aerial shooting, but it is one of a few things I disagree with SP on. It is the job of Congress to stop this. I guess she gets her Senate vote. But if you would like to give money to a group that would put an end to shooting wolves and bears from planes, go here:

http://www.care2.com/news/category/animals

Comment by AnnieCarmel | 2008-09-05 00:43:39

Wouldn’t you be surprised if Sarah and her father hunted from a plane? Seems to me they are more like the old style guys…on the ground. At least they don’t hunt only for sport…they actually use for food. But I’m with you about the “sport” of killing from a plane with high powered scopes, etc.

It wouldn’t be for me…I’m down to mostly Salmon, grains, vegies and fruits…mostly because of the lack of food safety with beef, chicken, etc. But I don’t play food Nazi for anyone else…I do have friends though who are rabid on the subject of meat eating. Even had one who tried to be a “Breatharian”. That only lasted for a couple of days. LOL. A couple really have their knickers in a twist over the Mooseburgers. Well, this is California after all where all the nuttiest of nuttiest reside. And too, they’re for Barry so it’s easy to be outraged when you don’t go along with the cult.

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-09-05 01:23:12

I am vegetarian, though I stray on holidays when I’m invited for dinner. I love animals and used to canvas for the Sierra Club.

 
 
 

Comment by Obama is a bum | 2008-09-05 00:59:58

If Obama gets elected then the wolf will always be at the door.

 

Comment by Marie | 2008-09-05 01:22:58

I’m a card carrying PETA member.
Obama and his wife eat meat. Factory farming is just as cruel as killing wolves.
So unless you and Obama and his wife are vegan, don’t even pretend you actually care about wolves.

 

Comment by no vote for Oblabla | 2008-09-05 01:51:51

Obammunist voted to allow live and viable infants born after botched abortions to be shoved into steel pans, placed in closets and left all alone to die slow and agonizing deaths. This is called infanticide…

Since you bring up your pet wolf I’ll bring up my pet dog who was so loving, protective and caring with her babies. If anyone other than us, her immediate family, even got close to her pups she would have torn them to shreds. My dog is way smarter than Obammunist.

BTW TTO why are you here?

 

Comment by Ted Kennedy's Swim Coach | 2008-09-05 11:30:31

Only if the plane has the Obama faux presidential seal on it! LOL

 
 

Comment by carpetride | 2008-09-04 22:39:14

 

Comment by NoBAma | 2008-09-04 22:42:29

Two Term Obama spreading more nonsense. Palin wants to control the wolf population that’s running rampant and killing other animals. Her plan makes sense to me.

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-09-05 00:12:44

Also, if you live in an area where wolves and coyotes attack livestock, house pets and children, you might consider adopting a Great Pyrenees or a related breed. They are hard-wired for the job.

Comment by dpvegas | 2008-09-05 05:20:20

Now I get it. Controlling the wolf population makes sense.

I’m from Idaho and when I was young, ranchers got a bounty put on cougars and wolves. I didn’t like it, but since I had family who were small ranchers (you easterners would fall over at what a “small” ranch consists of), I understood it.

 
 
 

Comment by EightBelles | 2008-09-04 22:45:26

The CBS evening news with Katie Couric showed a clip of Gov Sarah Palin’s rousing acceptance speech–the part where Palin talks about being proud to be an American in good times and in bad. The clip was followed by Michelle Obama’s “For the first time in my life I’m proud to be an American” buzz killer. The two speeches were as different as day and night. For starters, Sarah Palin looked energized and proud to be tapped for the honor of serving her country as VP, while Michelle Obama came across as bitter and depressed. I was frankly surprised CBS had the chuzpah to roll out this Michelle anything but All American moment. I have to give CBS credit. Could it be the MSM are starting to come out from under the ether?

Comment by Fritz | 2008-09-04 22:49:53

I think CBS have always been a bit leery of Kool-Aid.

 

Comment by mimi | 2008-09-04 23:36:39

Just may have to start watching Katie.

 

Comment by Dan | 2008-09-05 00:06:30

Seriously … I simply can’t believe that CBS would do that. Maybe there’s hope for them after all.

 

Comment by J.J. (The Puma) | 2008-09-05 00:09:22

I think this is Katie Couric behind this. Remember she made a comment during one of her newscasts about the sexism against Hillary. (Earned her a worst person in the world from Keith).

 

Comment by Obama is a bum | 2008-09-05 01:05:52

micHELLe has always been a bitter black woman who hates US and hates white people. No matter how the Obama campaign trys to package micHELLe to change that image for the sake of Obama winning an election, she is and always will be a racist snob.

Comment by 935 Lies | 2008-09-05 02:20:18

I enthusiastically return the favor to her.

 

Comment by dpvegas | 2008-09-05 05:23:39

And she married a bi-racial man, and had children with him. Is she the reason he keeps his family hidden?

 
 
 

Comment by Fritz | 2008-09-04 22:46:07

This article’s a bit late. Susan covered this in stellar fashion earlier. But of course if it means a diaper change for Two Term Obama then it’s worth it. LOL

 

Comment by Fritz | 2008-09-04 22:48:32

As Lynyrd Skynyrd used to sing:

No no more Obama!
To our country we’ll be true!
No no more Obama!
Lord we’re coming home to you!

 

Comment by candymarl | 2008-09-04 22:51:11

I think Palin was terrific. I noticed the biggest applause McCain got at times was when he mentioned her.

I watched videos of McCain and he does best one on one and in small crowds. Obama is just the opposite. He seems to need large adoring crowds. He’s visibly uncomfortable in one on one situations.

Palin never claimed she or her family were better than any other American family. That resonates.

 

Comment by olivia1998 | 2008-09-04 22:54:30


Great speech McCain

 

Comment by fred | 2008-09-04 22:56:19

how could anyone justify voting for Obama over McCain? The man has earned the right to lead. He chose to serve his country and paid dearly. Reminds me of how they passed up Hillary after all her service to our country for do nothing Obama. The question is not whats wrong with our politicians it’s what wrong with our people. How do you reward a mother fucker who has done nothing, but attend a hate the man church, befriend every creep that hates America, and committed the largest election theft in America’s history? you make him President. The Americans people voting or considering voting for Obama is demented

Comment by 30yrdem-not any more | 2008-09-04 22:59:27

I agree…
McCain/Palin’08

 

Comment by palin is a nutty zealot and mccain's a sell-out! | 2008-09-05 00:30:57

mccain HAS NOT earned the right to lead. i heard none of his leadership plans during his speech: the bulk of it was about his military service/pow experience, uh, almost 40 years ago.

mccain is not running for “4-star general”; he’s running for president. and the last i heard, having one’s limbs broken by the enemy does not automatically qualify one for president. the left gets it: mccain is a war hero and we are all — left, right, and center — incredibly proud of him, but you righties need to face it: mccain is “dubya, redux,” and tonite during his convention speech, even the crowd wasn’t excited about him…the unease was palpable. i actually felt sorry for him up on that stage…i don’t understand why, at almost 72 (and he’s an “old” 72), he’s putting himself thru this…he deserves better than the inevitable november defeat he will face.

and how many more palin family secrets are we going to have to endure until the first tuesday of november? i’ve almost gotten used to the hunker-down position i’ve assumed ever since mccain chose her as his running mate. hey, i’m a liberal and i love watching the “palin family white trash circus” and it’s entertaining how she’s managed, in 6 days, to take the “values” out of “family values,” but she’s become an embarrassment! just out of the much bally-hooed “maverick” spirit we keep hearing about, mccain should’ve already asked her to tender her resignation. the “maverick” sold himself short by cow-towing to his party’s rabid and homophobic conservative base, aka the evangelicals. had he wanted to leave a real legacy, even if it had meant defeat in november, he would’ve insisted on his true choice: joe lieberman. mccain’s a sell-out and has always short-changed himself when push comes to shove. historically, the republican party has “done him wrong.” he’s been their b*tch the last few presidential cycles, and 2008 will be no different.

the evangelical right has taken the republican party hostage…it started in 2000, and it’s happening again. it’s to the detriment of the republican party, but they deserve it if they continue to cater to a very small segment of this country. did you see all the white faces at the convention? all those forced smiles, strained grins…i felt uncomfortable for them. and the tv cameras had a helluva time finding any kind of diversity in the crowd — the republican party needs to address why this is — they need to look inward.

mccain was always willing to do that, but it takes more than one man to heal a corpse, rotting from the inside…but also, conversely, he himself voted 95 percent of the time with bush…the “maverick” went into the sunset years ago and we’re left with this old, very well respected patriot who should be enjoying his golden years with more dignity. he had his chance, but it was years ago, and his time to be president has passed.

the independent and undecided voters are smart enough to know that palin’s religious zealotry is not what they want. you can give a religious fanatic a nice, new outfit and shiny shoes, fix her hair and have her practice using a teleprompter, but the wise can see she stands for “do as i say and not as i do”: her statement about bristol when announcing bristol’s pregnancy was that it was bristol’s choice to have her baby and they were very proud of her — it’s nice that bristol has that choice; but with a bush-palin administration and a few new conservative supreme court judges, the rest of america will have that choice taken away from them.

palin’s speech on wednesday catered only to the far right; it was mean-spirited and toxic, and offered no solutions. (and don’t call me a sexist, because criticizing someone who happens to be female is not sexist. it’s possible to actually not like a candidate for their political position, never mind their gender, and that’s the case in this situation. she’s smarmy and patronizing. she’s like that kid you knew at school who thinks she’s the smartest kid in the class and lets you know it, when actually people are only talking to her because her parents have a swimming pool.)

after a few days of palin’s convention speech being replayed and after the mccain-palin defeat in november, all the cable channels will be playing palin’s convention speech, in retrospect, asking their audience, “what was mccain thinking? what was the republican party thinking?”

if the republican party wants a theocracy, where only christianity is allowed, a patriarchal society is instituted, and women are forced to forfeit rights over their own body, have at it. because that’s what the party, under mccain “the sell-out” and palin “the religious zealot,” want it to become.

did the viet cong steal mccain’s balls? let’s go on a search-and-recovery tour to find them…i smell road trip!

Comment by 935 Lies | 2008-09-05 02:28:18

Anyone ignorant enough to confuse the PFLN (Popular Front for the Liberation of Vietnam, or, “Viet Cong” - operating in South Vietnam) and the NVA (North Vietnames Army, an agency of the North Vietnamese government) is too stupod to continue stealing oxygen and certainly unqualified to have an opinion on the matter.

Probably most other matters, as well. Most eighth graders can spell “kowtow.”

>>> did the viet cong steal mccain’s balls? let’s go on a search-and-recovery tour to find them…i smell road trip!

I smell dipshit.

Comment by mccain will lose in 2008 | 2008-09-05 10:47:03

hey, “935 Lies”:
“stupid” is not spelled “stupod”…ya got that, stupid?

and the viet cong had operatives in both north and south vietnam, numb nuts.

your candidate needs to give it up…if he was such a great candidate, your party would’ve chosen him over bush in 2000…but no, in 2000, bush’s karl rove was too busy smearing mccain’s reputation…where were all of you then, eight years ago, defending mccain?

you’re showing yourself for the re-thug-lican sychopant that you are, s-t-u-p-i-d.