RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Category 5 Hurricane Sarah Makes Landfall

Photos shamelessly stolen from the Patriot Room’s piece entitled Category 5 Hurricane Sarah Makes Landfall.

It’s kind of amusing when the Vice President of one ticket garners a larger audience than the opposing party’s Presidential candidate. This must be especially annoying to a Narcissist like Barack Obama.


Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post219 Comments »

Comment by William L. Donlon | 2008-09-06 00:28:59

Tax probe into long time Clinton supporter was started during the Primaries.

The Tax probe into Charles Rangel, 15th Congressional District of New York, was started by Obama Operatives after he refused to defect in February.

Rangel, the head of the “Ways and Means” Committee is the most powerful Black man in America.

Rangel’s influence at a brokered Dem. Convention was feared and the Obama Campaign was looking for “leverage” to use against Rangel if it got tough in Denver.

Convention over, probe over, Pay back taxes and a fine and move on.

No one will notice—RIGHT???

Yeah! Like we are not all adults here and need the facts of life explained.

Well it didn’t go un-noticed by the PUMAs Barack!

Other Clinton supporters report they have been similarly threatened by Obama.

It was meant to send the chilling message, “if they can do this to Rangel, what can they do to you”???

Down load this post and e-mail it to everyone out there who worked for Clinton.

“To be for warned is to be for armed”.

I have nothing but the highest respect for Charles Rangel who never caved.

Comment by mimi | 2008-09-06 01:01:26

Link please… with regard to the fact that 0bama’s campaign initiated the probe into Rangel’s taxes in February because he refused to defect.

If this is true, then there’s a reason Percy Sutton spilled the beans in a March interview on 0bama’s connection to al-Monsour and the Saudis. Rangel, Sutton, Dinkins, Paterson(the father of the governor) are all buddies.

You people don’t seem to realize, 0bama is apparently blackmailing a lot of Dems. He’s holding the Party hostage.

Comment by Hillary'sSimplytheBest | 2008-09-06 01:11:21

ok, that’s just sick. Mac needs to take this O’bloodsucker out for good.

Comment by Paul F. Villarreal | 2008-09-06 04:16:40

There’s good news on that front. Obama’s ambitious ‘50 State’ strategy is rapidly contracting as he cedes more and more states to McCain:

http://www.thenewstribune.com/Tacoma/24hour/front/story/473166.html

Ads have now been pulled from Georgia, and the purported ‘map changing’ of Obama is being further exposed as the lie it has always been.

And Palin has only just come on the scene to steal votes from Obama bin Biden.

Here’s where things are at, for real:

- The race will come down, very likely, to OH, MI, and PA

- The only 2 states that BHO may pick up from Kerry (252 EV’s in 2004) are IA & NM. That would give him 264 EV’s, and give McCain 274.

McCain = president.

If McCain wins either MI or PA, he almost certainly will be the next President.

So, what do we have to do?

1. Pound MI, PA and OH. Volunteer, write local papers Letters to the Editor, etc. Drive to these states and help canvas. Anything.

2. Help prevent ACORN-led voter fraud. There are already reports of an Obama scheme to ship IL voters in to OH to vote on Election Day, similar to busing that took place in the Democratic primaries. Help shut this down, and not just in OH. If you see suspect voter registration taking place, report it. If you can volunteer to be trained to help prevent voting fraud on or before Election Day, do it.

On junk sites like 538 dot com, you will hear utter crap about how everything has to break just so for McCain to win.

False.

Right now, McCain is poised to win. Forget about the national number. State to state, he is set to win the EV contest. If the election were held today, McCain would be the President. Again, BHO would only, for sure, pick up IA. He would likely pick up NM. He would probably win MI and might win PA.

And he would still lose, with 264 EV’s.

This is one reason the Palin pick was so good. First, consolidate your base. After that, start picking off Indys and female voters, bit by bit, state by state. This is how to do it.

We are in the perfect position to win this election. Things could not be better. There’s still plenty to be done, but right now everything is set-up for Mr. Illegitimate to be defeated, along with the corrupt DNC. And then we can take the party back that was stolen from our majority.

It is all right there for us. Go out, embrace the McCain/Palin ticket — if only to help us clean out the infected DNC — and help bring this victory home.

This thing is much further along than many realize. We only need to finish strong and the nightmare that is Obama will be gone, permanently.

Comment by Bellevue_NW_Voter | 2008-09-06 07:13:52

You wrote: If you can volunteer to be trained to help prevent voting fraud on or before Election Day, do it.

How? Where?

Comment by MG | 2008-09-06 10:34:34

Contact your local County Clerk-Recorder (CA) or the Elections Office in your State.

MG

 
 

Comment by pasmalltowngirl | 2008-09-06 10:45:52

After I read your post, I went to John Mcain’s web sit to order a sign for my yard.

This area, as with most of Pa. is predominantly Democrat. I am a registered Dem. I will proudly display a McCain/Palin sign in my yard.

Our country, our children, our future will always come before any political party. I can assure you, that even though, Pa. is a Dem. state, we are Americans first and always. I find it very unlikely that Obama will win Pa. We are not bitter people who cling to guns and religion. We are very proud people, proud to have the privilege to live in this great country. We are fighters, we will fight for the freedom and safety of our country, we will fight for our children’s future.

I will be voting for McCain/Palin as a registered Democrat, to send a strong message to the DNC. I will also be mailing my change of party affiliation on the same day, I will be changing to an Independent.

I recommend that everyone go to John McCain’s site and watch his video. It brought tears to my eyes. Country First !!!

http://www.johnmccain.com/convention.htm

 

Comment by Andy | 2008-09-06 12:17:19

 

Comment by Andy | 2008-09-06 12:18:54

 
 
 

Comment by Peggy Sue | 2008-09-06 02:14:29

And this is why I’m voting Republican for the first time in my life. The Democratic Party needs to be disinfected and hosed down. It’s repulsive.

McCain/Palin ‘08

Comment by standard | 2008-09-06 07:33:48

Congratulations. Your comment made “Gem of the Day” at
httpCOLON//newwavedemocratsDOTwordpress.com/comment-of-the-day/

 
 

Comment by karen for Clinton (sigh, McPalin now) | 2008-09-06 05:11:46

William Donlon and mimi,

This Rangel investigation being from ob makes total sense. That Percy Sutton outted something like that was very curious, I thought maybe his age was a factor and he said too much.

My ex-husband worked in the early 70’s in Percy’s borough president office, so I am well aware of what fine men they both were and I’d bet still are today.

Dinkin’s wasn’t the greatest mayor, but he too was a good man and he got my vote, as did Jesse.

Jesse wanting to cut off ob’s nuts - this is just the type of thing that would make him want to do it.

Jesse fasted to atone for the remark and then got sick to his stomach, literally.

If Jackson, Rangel, Dinkin’s etal know then lots of people know and it will come out.

So who sent them to destroy Rangel? OBAMA FITS, he has done it before, it is his Modus Operandi.

And a whole lot of NY’ers are not going to forgive and forget that.

Comment by mimi | 2008-09-06 12:31:26

0bama’s trying to destroy Rangel, that’s clear. He probably wants Bill Perkins to run for it. The Assemblyman who said “Harlem’s not Bill Clinton’s personal plantation.” Before I let that happen, I’ll run for the seat myself.

Comment by trixta | 2008-09-06 13:44:45

If I were a NY-er I’d vote for you, MIMI!

 
 
 

Comment by getfitnow | 2008-09-06 06:35:24

There was a story in NYTimes online yesterday re: Rangel and “sweet” mortgage terms on villa. I just looked at headline and didn’t read the story.

 

Comment by athy | 2008-09-06 11:13:00

That is one of my major concerns about Sen Obama’s campaign…Who is really in charge–the DNC puppetmasters OR the puppet (and his REAL masters) …

The DNC may have chosen Sen Obama as the Democratic pre-ordained nominee for the presidential election however… HOW WELL DID THEY VET HIM??? Does the DNC think it controls (or can control) Sen Obama and his associates? What influence will the DNC have over Sen Obama IF Sen Obama becomes president?

Many things worry me about Sen Obama’s candidacy and the most obvious is the following:

http://www.barackbook.com/
Obama facebook

We dont want ANY of these people getting anywhere Washington DC, our Constitution, or our Bill of Rights.

These are all close associates of Sen Obama.
Sen Obama owes many people many favors…what are they expecting as repayment?

If Sen Obama wins…who will really be in charge of our country?

 
 

Comment by gerard "Barracuda" Nedich | 2008-09-06 02:27:24

isn’t he the slimeball that had 4 (yes 4) rent controlled apartments from a huge corporation? and he was using one of the apartments as his office which was illegal?

the ny times did an expose on him a few months ago…

he was furious…

a. hillary
b. mccain

america first!

Comment by athy | 2008-09-06 11:26:06

Gerard-

Pure speculation here on my part however…I do wonder how many months Sen Obama’s campaign sat on that information before it decided to pull it out and use it against Rangel when he refused to follow along?

What Rengel did was wrong.

Would it have come out in the open if he supported Sen Obama’s campaign?

How many other politician’s have had this tactic used against them to get them to support Sen Obama?

If any of these pols were ‘blackmailed’ (xtra marital affairs, coke habits, kids on drugs, illegal non Us citizen as employees, took bribe 10 years ago…WHATEVER) by Obama campaign to gain their support in his race for the presidency-you do realize that they are ‘in his pocket’ forever…
If they succumbed to any blackmail at this early stage, Sen Obama OWNS THEM….period.

Look back at this race…are there any endorsements of Sen Obama made by any politicians that just left you shaking your head asking…”what the hell?
How,why,when? ”

Dig a little deeper as to why these politicians may have supported Sen Obama.

Get facts…ask about what specific policy ideas of Sen Obama converted these die hard Democrats to throw their support 100% behind Obama so early, so very early, in the campaign.

Read old interviews-not the stuff they are saying today.

Comment by mimi | 2008-09-06 12:41:51

0bama has a nerve! He lives in a Rezko glass mansion. Throwing stones at Rangel? Don’t make me laugh! What a freakin hypocrite.

I can’t believe that the Dem let this punkass prick get away with this shit.

We have to rebuild the Party.

 

Comment by trixta | 2008-09-06 13:47:11

If Obama wins this election, he will begin a purging every Dem that did not originally support him! He will then control the Party fully. We can’t allow this to happen.

 
 
 

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-09-06 04:11:57

Charlie Rangel sat with Hill and Chelsea during Bill’s RNC address–the one where Mrs. O looked like she had shit on her lip.

In contrast, Charlie, Hill and Chel looked like they’d just come from Happy Hour and discovered they’d won a free trip to the Bahamas on top of it all–they looked simply overjoyed.

Gotta wonder what THEY know!

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-09-06 04:13:43

Pardon, DNC address, not RNC. Funny how they all look alike now….

Comment by karen for Clinton (sigh, McPalin now) | 2008-09-06 05:13:58

he he,

2000 and 2004 they were the rethuglicans

2008 it is the dimocrat obamacrats.

 
 
 

Comment by standard | 2008-09-06 07:35:16

Charlie Rengal is a brilliant politician who has done NY proud.
This harassment is making me puking sick to my stomach.

Comment by Woman Voter | 2008-09-06 07:55:51

Charles Rangel is simply the best and such a gentleman and one that served his country too. I hope he is fine and that this too passes. He will always be a class act!

Comment by trixta | 2008-09-06 13:53:21

Too bad Rangle was the one to force HRC to finally end her campaign. (Rememeber, she did not concede after the final primaries took place in June.) A few days later she gave her last primary speech.

I, too, was intrigued that he sat with HRC and Chelsea at the convention. They looked like they were having a blast!

 
 
 

Comment by fif | 2008-09-06 09:00:14

You are wrong to say that he never caved. After Hillary won the final primary, and gave that speech saying she wanted to hear from her supporters and “would talk to Party leaders” about how she would more forward (ie: should she take it to the Convention floor), it was Charles Rangel that strongarmed her to drop out. He made a public statement that was critical, saying she needed to declare for Obama. I am a New Yorker, and I was very disappointed by his capitulation.

Comment by mimi | 2008-09-06 12:47:05

I’m a New Yorker and I was too. But given what I have learned and the fact that none of the SDs all over the country were going to support Hillary in a brokered Convention, it really didn’t matter what Rangel did at that point.

Face it, 0bama stole the Primary.

 
 

Comment by sjl106 | 2008-09-06 09:57:47

obama and his thugs are sleazes, they threatened all of the members of the CBC who supported Hillary and though it was mentioned once or twice by the media they never did their jobs.

 

Comment by Andy | 2008-09-06 11:58:22

William Donlon:

Could you please post some links?

 
 

Comment by Seattle Moss | 2008-09-06 00:31:32

I love strong Women!!
Gives me that tingly feeling up my leg

Comment by red_sleeves | 2008-09-06 01:40:57

http://www.tmz.com/2008/09/05/convention-hangover/

Kind of cool. Although, I did give Biden a sympathy vote. I’d have a beer with him, …..as long as he is paying.

Grab a beer with
Palin 43%
Obama 28%
McCain 16%
Biden 13%

Biggest disappointment
Biden 34%
McCain 33%
Obama 19%
Palin 14%

Biggest star
Palin 51%
Obama 45%
McCain 3%
Biden 1%

Comment by matchles | 2008-09-06 11:41:31

Voting for the person we’d rather grab a beer with did us wonders during the Bush-Kerry election.

Comment by red_sleeves | 2008-09-06 23:39:14

You’re correct…

Kerry would have shat gold bricks and we’d all be millionaires in perfect health with the whole world lining up to give us hand jobs.

 
 
 

Comment by red_sleeves | 2008-09-06 01:42:39

 

Comment by red_sleeves | 2008-09-06 01:48:42

Comment by Bellevue_NW_Voter | 2008-09-06 07:18:10

Been out for a while.

 
 
 

Comment by athena | 2008-09-06 00:31:54

Oh you know this is killing “the One” and Oprah…..

Comment by Pink Panther | 2008-09-06 00:32:38

Neither Obama nor Oprah look well these days. They look tired.

Comment by BlueTopaz | 2008-09-06 00:42:44

This makes me very happy! 2 racists facing reality.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha….HA!

 
 

Comment by Hispana | 2008-09-06 01:26:54

May Oprah stress and eat her way to a new size 100. I think that she will pay as US Mag did. No one is looking at this behavior and taking it with a grain of salt.

Comment by AnnieCarmel | 2008-09-06 02:16:59

Gretawire had a vote tonight as to whether Oprah made a mistake saying she’s like to have Sarah on her show but because she doesn’t want to play politics on the show, she’d ask her for after the election. No matter that she had Barry and MEchille on twice before the primary and has done nothing but promote and shill for him.

I believe the vote was 97% for mistake. Many comments saying that Sarah shouldn’t do Oprah and that after the election she wouldn’t be available because she’d be too busy getting up to speed as VP! HAAH! So much for Harpo. Her ratings are sinking as I type.

 

Comment by tzada | 2008-09-06 06:54:16

I think the reason she had the Olympians on here show (I thinks she did or will) is to try and get them to endorse Sir Barks a Lot.

 
 

Comment by tillthen | 2008-09-06 05:35:50

Fuck Oprah, She knows what Obama is, that he is implicated in murders, that he had limo sex with Larry Sinclair, the business with Rezko,

OPRAH KNOWS ABOUTH ALL THIS AND STILL SHE SUPPORTS THIS POS!! SO MUCH FOR HER HUMANITY. SHE’S A RACIST JUST LIKE BARKY. PAY BACK TIME? FUCK HER.

BOYCOTT GENERAL ELECTRIC AND OPRAH

Comment by MG | 2008-09-06 11:09:03

Yes! I sold all of my stock holdings in GE. (Note to investors: GE is going

d
o
w
n

MG!

 
 
 

Comment by James | 2008-09-06 00:34:21

She’s getting more love than Senator Clinton, that’s the part I don’t like. But as long as Obama is not elected, it’s cool.

Comment by athena | 2008-09-06 00:38:45

Well that is required to detract from Mr. Fancy Pants!

 

Comment by MaryPat | 2008-09-06 01:04:20

I hear that McCain’s speech also had as many viewers as Obama’s spectacle at Invesco Field. And here Barry and the DNC spent all that money on fancy Greek columns and fireworks. Snicker…

It appears that the voters may have had enough of staring at shiny objects. The real woman running for VP on the Republican ticket is so much more compelling than Senator Smoke and Mirrors.

Comment by Shine My Shoes Barky Boy | 2008-09-06 01:06:08

No - McCain had MORE. And this despite it being boycotted by the democratic black supremacy television channels.

[ADMINISTRATOR: YOUR USERNAME IS RACIST. YOU ARE BANNED.]

Comment by Brendy | 2008-09-06 03:58:27

Yes, McCain had MORE VIEWERS and LESS t.v. stations picked it up than Obummers! LOL!

 
 

Comment by sjl106 | 2008-09-06 10:07:16

McCain beat obama’s viewership by 500,000 people and 4 less stations that covered the convention, go figure…LOL

 
 
 

Comment by cdo | 2008-09-06 00:51:32

Obama’s sorry routine got old a while ago. (he is STILL using that lame “my name is funny sounding” shtick…yawn)
The media has a new shiny. Good for PUMA if this gets McCain over the finish line.
My only concern is cleaning up the god awful mess inside the DNC. We have no party until that happens.
Palin’s ability to remain a player on a long term basis will not be apparent for quite awhile.
We know Hillary will be around, thats good enough for me.

Comment by Dhyana | 2008-09-06 01:53:31

I don’t see how electing McCain is going to be good for Americans, and don’t see how electing Obama is good for Americans. I’ll sleep like Rip Van Winkle for 4 years. Hopefully we’ll have good candidates from both parties that give us good choices instead of holding our noses.

Comment by silverfox | 2008-09-06 10:31:04

dhyana….

McCain will be good for Americans because he has trust factor that is completely absent from obama.

may not agree with him in all things, but he has record that speaks for well for him. also, he is the most active bi-partisan republican or democrat, and that fares well for us all.

what has obama got….more flip flops than a beach in summer.

no record of record, and a bunch of bums in his immediate corner.

i’m no republican, but i am definitely no obamacan

guess that makes me a McCain Democrat.

time for caution to the wind, and pray for the best for the most. this is what my intuition is strongly urging right now. more will be revealed later.

then Hillary in 4 yrs. and a rebuilt dem leadership.

Comment by csuzeq | 2008-09-06 16:25:46

I like to be referred to as a Clinton democrat.

 
 
 

Comment by tzada | 2008-09-06 07:07:04

Yea I put that crap right up there with his stupid “silly season” remark. Is he gonna stare down Putin telling him this is just “silly season”? How infantile, non presidential. Is he gonna flip him off too?

Right now he is declaring war on Pakistan.
http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/photo/2007/08/01/PH2007080102579.jpg

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/01/AR2007080101233_2.html

To me he looks like a man deranged, scary and crazed.
Do you want his hands on the red button?

 
 

Comment by fred | 2008-09-06 00:58:24

Root is no fan of the Democratic nominee: “A vote for Obama is four years of Karl Marx, and no one should be happy about that,” he told us and a few genial young libertarian activists over cocktails. “He’s a communist! I don’t care what anybody says. The guy’s a communist…. And his mother was a card-carrying communist, and he says she’s the most important person in his entire life; he learned everything from her.

Some excerpts from the conversation:

Matt Welch: So tell us what we should know about Barack Obama that we don’t?

Wayne Allyn Root: I think the most dangerous thing you should know about Barack Obama is that I don’t know a single person at Columbia that knows him, and they all know me. I don’t have a classmate who ever knew Barack Obama at Columbia. Ever

continue reading here: http://countusout.wordpress.com/

Comment by Shine My Shoes Barky Boy | 2008-09-06 01:10:59

[ADMINISTRATOR: YOUR USERNAME IS RACIST. YOU ARE BANNED.]

Does anyone doubt that possibly Barack could have gotten into Harvard with a C average because he’s black, where as I, white, couldn’t get into the same school with a B-plus, A-minus average? And yet his wife says that America is a terrible nation unfair to minorities! I say, Au contraire!

This is a must read.
http://countusout.wordpress.com/2008/09/06/wayne-allyn-roots-million-dollar-challenge/

Comment by Shine My Shoes Barky Boy | 2008-09-06 01:17:58

[ADMINISTRATOR: YOUR USERNAME IS RACIST. YOU ARE BANNED.]

This is the original link.

http://reason.com/news/show/128461.html

It’s really amazing what one does not know about Obama. It’s really amazing this has been kept so far from the media and the public attention; it’s amazing all we have is a couple of books more fantasy and fiction than fact; it’s amazing all this goes on and no one in the MSM reacts.

Comment by Heather | 2008-09-06 02:15:40

Yes, where are the old friends of Obama? Why don’t they come forward to testify about him, like the old friends of people like Palin, Hillary and John McCain do? Obama has NO personal references. At least none that are presentable. Has he spent his whole life trolling the gutters for Rezko types and having one-nighters with Larry Sinclairs? Has he thrown everyone he ever knew under some large form of transportation? Is he a desperate loner?

I mean, folks, none of these options looks particularly savory.

Comment by chris | 2008-09-06 10:19:00

You know I have wondered that for a long time. Where are all the people from his past that are his friends? He hardly ever even has family with him except for wife and kids. This is a more than curious interview from someone at the same college when he was. I read before that he did get into Harvard via legacy and Mansour. True or not I don’t know. However, there is way too much in his background, both known and unknown, that should be brought out to the public. It is incredible that the MSM can sit on this stuff and no one calls them on it. They’d rather pick on 17 year olds who are not even running for anything. What bunch of asses they all are. I hope this gets thrown all over the net. Send it to Hannity, Rush, Beck, Dobs and Greta and maybe they will pick it up. Here’s hoping anyway.

Comment by Zee | 2008-09-06 16:13:38

Me, too, chris…did he have any girlfriends? Or boyfriends, perhaps?

I don’t care for these Libertarians with their racist overtones, but it is a fact there is a HUGE cone of silence around Obama’s past.

WHY?

 
 
 

Comment by Heather | 2008-09-06 02:21:41

Hey go to votesmart.org and look at Palin’s published letters and declarations. You will see that she is a fiscal conservative who has exercised line-item vetos very thoughtfully with an eye to reducing expenses and putting money in the bank for Alaska’s future. Every veto reflects a lot of investigation. Her budget letters describe meetings she has held with the sponsors of projects and with affected communities, and how she has carefully divided up the budget requests into those that can be granted, those that should be funded another way, those that are redundant, etc. These documents, all on the public record, indicate that she is VERY thorough and very fair.

Meanwhile Barky’s documentation from his IL Senate days is strangely missing. As are his transcripts from Columbia. As is his birth certificate.

 
 

Comment by hank48188 | 2008-09-06 10:51:54

This is a GREAT READ, this guy is from the same class as Obama at Columbia and knows many people from that school and NONE OF THEM ever remember Obama. Obama is a complete FRAUD

Comment by trixta | 2008-09-06 14:01:09

Instructors would know & remember him. All universities have required courses, so it shouldn’t be difficult to talk to those instructors at the very least.

Comment by Zee | 2008-09-06 16:15:33

Then why hasn’t it been done, long ago?

Cone of silence.

 
 
 
 

Comment by Dhyana | 2008-09-06 01:55:51

A vote for Obama is four years of incompetence, like Bush, and a vote for McCain is four years of a divided government that will go nowhere. I prefer the divided government, but not by much.

Comment by RepublicanChick | 2008-09-06 02:04:58

At the rate Obama is going, the Democrats may end up losing Congressional seats as well. There’s nothing like cheering for our divided government to go nowhere.

We’ve already acheived that marker these past two years. No thank you!

Comment by RepublicanChick | 2008-09-06 02:05:42

acheived should be achieved

 

Comment by Patrick Walker | 2008-09-06 07:47:50

Actually, this may not be the case. A month ago or so the pollsters were basically saying that the Democratic brand was going up and the Republcian brand was going down. What was interesting is how they mentioned these trends not affecting their Presidential nominees.

The Democratic brand was not lifting Obama and the Republican brand was not sinking McCain.

Comment by VinceP1974 | 2008-09-06 11:52:19

I dont claim to have any data.. but i think if the media keeps up it’s insane bias, and if the McCain can get people to see the danger of Obama, and/or if something comes up that shows Congress inaction in face of a crisis… there just might be a switch back.

Did anyone anticipate the 1994 switch? I dont remember

 
 
 
 

Comment by tzada | 2008-09-06 07:11:40

I sent that article to Drudge last night. Everyone of us needs to send it and get this message out.

 
 

Comment by cdo | 2008-09-06 01:00:27

I don’t watch tv, wasn’t there another Bill O’Rielly interview tonight?
Anyone see it if there was?

Comment by red_sleeves | 2008-09-06 01:33:31

Not tonight.

The interview will air in three more parts, at 8 p.m. ET Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday.

Comment by PewL | 2008-09-06 10:58:51

Bill Oreilly also starting on Tuesday nite, with Ayers Rev Wright,and who Obama really is..Should be a good week on Fox…imo

 
 
 

Comment by Shine My Shoes Barky Boy | 2008-09-06 01:00:43

[ADMINISTRATOR: YOUR USERNAME IS RACIST. YOU ARE BANNED.]

I don’t get it - Hill didn’t even get to get her votes counted? They whipped her into calling for an ACCLAMATION for Cheap Suit? This is democracy? What’s the matter with the media? How come nobody is calling the DNC and Obama out on this? Don’t they see he’s stolen/hijacked the entire party?

And they don’t get it either when everyone runs to the Sarah camp - they don’t get it.

Are they all brain damaged or what? Are they deliberately trying to conceal this from as many voters as possible?

And the new wave of vitriol is more vicious than ever. What drives these people?

Comment by Dhyana | 2008-09-06 01:57:18

Why go over old news? Oh I see, you’re a Republican troll.

Comment by karen for Clinton (sigh, McPalin now) | 2008-09-06 05:20:44

There is no old news obama troll. POTUS isn’t running for community organizer.

sheesh, these obots don’t have a clue.

 

Comment by stodghie | 2008-09-06 12:10:21

dhyana, take your head out of that dark place and come into the light. yeah, that’s right you! shame on you. go do some real homework besides the barfy spot! we know better and all you are to us is a good laugh. that’s right we laugh at you.

 
 
 

Comment by mimi | 2008-09-06 01:04:41

Obviously, a coup is being planned. There’s no other explanation.

 

Comment by Laura | 2008-09-06 01:17:04

She looks like Angelina Jolie in one of her action flicks , in this picture.

Comment by Shine My Shoes Barky Boy | 2008-09-06 01:20:48

No one see Rene Russo in the profile? As Rene looked in Tin Cup?

[ADMINISTRATOR: YOUR USERNAME IS RACIST. YOU ARE BANNED.]

Comment by chris | 2008-09-06 10:24:58

I’m jealous that someone who’s had 5 kids can look that good LOL. Brains and beauty, great personality and sense of humor, tough and capable. She’s the whole package that’s for sure. Males and females can find a lot to like about her. She brings a lot to the McCain ticket. Unlike Ob, she is a real person not some shadow man.

 
 
 

Comment by William L. Donlon | 2008-09-06 01:27:51

Sara Palin is to the Woman’s Rights Movement What Obama is to the Civil Rights Movement.

AAs have had two years to get used to the change Obama represents, but Women have had less than a Week.

Both have benefitted from their movements.

Both have been able to believe and dream things their movement founders could not.

Both are well educated, talk sass to power and are talented in their own right.

Each has evolved beyond their mentors.

Because of those who toiled in the “Movements” each is part of the first generation that has been able to “cash in” with college educations, a confidence and a self respect their mentors could only hope for.

They are to the Founders of Their “Movements”, what the “Boomers” were to their Mother and fathers of “The Greatest Generation” who fought WWII.

Bill, Hillary and Jessy are founders, Barack and Sarah are their beneficiaries.

In 2008 the torch has been passed.

That reflex you are feeling to hold on, that instinct not to let go, is the same mixed feeling every parent feels when the child leaves home.

We all crave change even as we fear it.
We all know that all change is not good just as all movement is not forward.

But America is founded on change and so are our social and cultural institutions.

Look at the nations like Cuba that do not have free elections and then look at those that do.

An election is change by it’s very nature.

The river you crossed in the January primaries is not the same river you seek to re cross in the general election.

The very waters have changed,in temperature, speed and debth.

Clinton and her supporters have done more to bring about this new dynamic than any one else on the field.

I’m proud of what Hillary has accomplished, but like Moses before her, there is no guarantee that she will get to the Promised Land.

Just her children..

Comment by LogicallySpeaking | 2008-09-06 06:01:14

In 2008 the torch has been passed.

I can’t really agree with the torch being passed.

 

Comment by Roninstia | 2008-09-06 06:06:56

Very well said, William. I concur. I am one of the unwashed masses of ignorant, baby boomer feminists. Seeing the presidential glass ceiling shattered before I die is more important to me than almost any policy issue. (The one that would have clinched my vote is Hillary’s universal healthcare plan. BO’s is BS.)

McCain/Palin ‘08

Comment by voterinexile | 2008-09-06 10:09:04

shattering the glass ceiling is an issue.

 
 

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-09-06 08:46:12

OH PLEASE….this isn’t “separation anxiety.”

The torch has been passed, all right–Donna Brazille passed it to Howard Dean, and he used it to light the fire that burnt the goddamned HOUSE down.

Now we are homeless, and now we are PISSED.

Howard can take that torch and shove it up his ass.

Comment by stodghie | 2008-09-06 12:13:16

i say burn down the house and start over. there are some good folks. rangel, lee, etc who can lead the aa congressional group. as for those who dissed clinton, i have no use for them. let them wander in the wasteland for all i care.

 
 
 

Comment by matchles | 2008-09-06 01:50:58

Palin totally fits into the republican mold; I can see why you guys like her so much. She is already so adept at lying. Such a strong reformer, hiring a lobbyist to secure 27 million dollars for the 7000 people in her city.

As governor it is even better, she lies about her support for the “bridge to nowhere”. Only cancels the project after the media calls congress on the bill. Then she goes on to steal the $220 million dollars in federal funds meant for the bridge, keeping it within the state.

You poor people are so deluded if you think she is anything close to the “reformer” you claim she is.

Comment by RepublicanChick | 2008-09-06 02:01:45

Barack totally fits the Democratic mold. I can see why you like him so much. He is so adept at lying. Such a strong advocate for “hope and change” in this “post racial” political world. He was a community organizer that did what? Potentially robbing millions of dollars earmarked for the children of Chicago? Beautiful!

As state Senator, he felt no need to take a clear position on various issues. He lies about his relationship with William Ayers and Tony Rezko. And those are just the two white guys from Chicago that I’ve mentioned. Many others, but so little time.

You little