RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

While Obama Attacks and Takes Lobbyists’ Money, McCain/Palin Propose Reform

Our nation’s financial crisis is dominating the news today — and it is in these times of crisis that we find out what our leaders are made of.

It is highly ironic that Barack Obama chose to respond to today’s shocking news by attacking McCain while McCain/Palin are proposing a reform of federal regulations. Obama is also blaming the Republican party for our nation’s crisis.

Yet it is Barack Obama who is the #2 recipient of lobbying handouts, out of 354 lawmakers, from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. (Don’t miss Jennifer Rubin’s excellent post today, “Whoops!: “The Agent of Change, it seems, didn’t exactly walk the walk on this one.”) Here is “Crisis,” the new McCain/Palin TV ad:

Here are the script and fact check list from the McCain campaign’s press release:

ANNCR: Our economy in crisis. Only proven reformers John McCain and Sarah Palin can fix it.

Tougher rules on Wall Street to protect your life savings.

No special interest giveaways.

Lower taxes to create new jobs.

Offshore drilling to reduce gas prices.

McCain - Palin.

Leadership, experience, for the change we need.

JOHN MCCAIN: I’m John McCain and I approved this message.

AD FACTS: Script For “Crisis” (TV :30)

ANNCR: Our economy in crisis. Only proven reformers John McCain and Sarah Palin can fix it. Tougher rules on Wall Street to protect your life savings. No special interest giveaways.

· John McCain: “And Under My Reforms, All Aspects Of A CEO’s Pay, Including Any Severance Arrangements, Must Be Approved By Shareholders.” “In times of hardship and distress, we should be more vigilant than ever in holding corporate abuses to account, as in the case of the housing market. Americans are right to be offended when the extravagant salaries and severance deals of CEO’s — in some cases, the very same CEO’s who helped to bring on these market troubles — bear no relation to the success of the company or the wishes of shareholders. Something is seriously wrong when the American people are left to bear the consequences of reckless corporate conduct, while the offenders themselves are packed off with another forty - or fifty million for the road. If I am elected president, I intend to see that wrongdoing of this kind is called to account by federal prosecutors. And under my reforms, all aspects of a CEO’s pay, including any sever ance arrangements, must be approved by shareholders.” (John McCain, Remarks, Washington, D.C., 6/10/08)

· John McCain And Governor Palin Will Reform Our Mortgage And Financial Markets. “Fixing Fannie and Freddie, and reforming our mortgage and financial markets, is critical to getting the housing market and the entire economy moving again. A great deal of the savings and wealth of American families is wrapped up in the value of their homes. A house has traditionally been the wealth-building course to retirement. The housing industry employs millions of Americans. One of us, John McCain, said over two years ago, ‘If Congress does not act, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose.’” (John McCain and Governor Sarah Palin, Op-Ed, “We’ll Protect Taxpayers From More Bailouts,” The Wall Street Journal, 9/9/08)

· John McCain And Governor Palin Will Address The Role Speculation Is Playing In Energy Prices. “Congress already has investigations underway to examine this kind of wagering in our energy markets, unrelated to any kind of productive commerce, because it can distort the market, drive prices beyond rational limits, and put the investments and pensions of millions of Americans at risk. John McCain believes that where we find abuses, they need to be swiftly punished. To make sure it never happens again, we must reform the laws and regulations governing the oil futures market, so that they are just as clear and effective as the rules applied to stocks, bonds, and other financial instruments.” (McCain-Palin 2008, “John McCain’s Lexington Project: A Comprehensive Plan To Break Our Dependence On Foreign Oil,” Press Release, 6/25/08)

· John McCain Fought For Financial Transparency In Stock Option Expensing. “U.S. Senator John McCain (R-AZ) today offered an amendment to the Accounting Reform Bill that would require companies to record the stock options that they grant to their employees as an expense on their financial statements. His floor statement follows: ‘Mr. President, I rise today to offer an amendment that requires companies to record the stock options that they grant to their employees as an expense on their financial statements. If companies want to claim these expenses as a deduction for tax purposes, they ought to be noted as expenses on a company’s income statement. We must end the double standard for stock options.’” (Office Of U.S. Senator John McCain, “We Must End Double Standard For Stock Option,” Press Release, 7/11/02)

· John McCain Has Long Fought For “Transparency Of Our Financial Markets.” “As the incoming Chairman of the Commerce Committee, I plan to conduct rigorous oversight over those aspects of corporate governance that fall under the panel’s purview. I also plan to pursue further reforms that are desperately needed such as expensing stock options. We have an obvious, pressing obligation to investors to ensure the transparency of our financial markets. Reform is a process. It is not a one-time fight.” (Office Of U.S. Senator John McCain, “McCain Declares Reform Crusade Continues,” Press Release, 11/14/01)

ANNCR: Lower taxes to create new jobs.

· John McCain And Governor Palin Will Keep Tax Rates Low. Entrepreneurs are at the heart of American innovation, growth and prosperity. Entrepreneurs create the ultimate job security — a new, better opportunity if your current job goes away. Entrepreneurs should not be taxed into submission. John McCain will keep the top tax rate at 35 percent, maintain the 15 percent rates on dividends and capital gains, and phase-out the Alternative Minimum Tax. Small businesses are the heart of job growth; raising taxes on them hurts every worker. (McCain-Palin 2008, “John McCain’s Jobs For America Economic Plain,” Press Release, 7/7/08)

· John McCain And Governor Palin Will Cut Taxes For Middle Class Families. John McCain will phase out and eliminate the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) — a tax that will be paid nearly exclusively by 25 million middle class families. Repealing this onerous tax will save middle class families nearly $60 billion in a single year. Under John McCain’s plan, a middle class family with children set to pay the AMT will save an average of over $2,700 — a real tax cut for working families. (McCain-Palin 2008, “John McCain’s Jobs For America Economic Plain,” Press Release, 7/7/08)

· John McCain And Governor Palin Will Double The Personal Exemption For Dependents. John McCain believes the tax code should be less of a burden on those, whether they are mothers and fathers or single parents, who are trying to raise a family. He proposes to raise the personal exemption for each dependent from $3,500 to $7,000. (McCain-Palin 2008, “John McCain’s Jobs For America Economic Plain,” Press Release, 7/7/08)

· John McCain And Governor Palin Will Establish Permanent Tax Credit Equal To 10 Percent Of Wages Spent On R&D. This reform will simplify the tax code, reward activity in the U.S., and make us more competitive with other countries. A permanent credit will provide an incentive to innovate and remove uncertainty. At a time when our companies need to be more competitive, we need to provide a permanent incentive to innovate, and remove the uncertainty now hanging over businesses as they make R&D investment decisions. (McCain-Palin 2008, “John McCain’s Jobs For America Economic Plain,” Press Release, 7/7/08)

· John McCain And Governor Palin Will Allow First-Year Deduction, Or “Expensing”, Of Equipment And Technology Investments. American workers need the finest technologies to compete. Expensing of equipment and technology will provide an immediate boost to capital expenditures and reward investments in cutting-edge technologies. (McCain-Palin 2008, “John McCain’s Jobs For America Economic Plain,” Press Release, 7/7/08)

· John McCain And Governor Palin Will Reduce The Federal Corporate Tax Rate To 25 Percent From 35 Percent. A lower corporate tax rate is essential to keeping good jobs in the United States. America was once a low-tax business environment, but as our trade partners lowered their rates, America failed to keep pace. We now have the second highest corporate tax rate in the world, making America a less attractive place for companies to do business. American workers deserve the chance to make fine products here and sell them around the globe. (McCain-Palin 2008, “John McCain’s Jobs For America Economic Plain,” Press Release, 7/7/08)

· John McCain And Governor Palin Will Ban Internet Taxes. John McCain has been a leader in keeping the Internet free of taxes. As President, he will seek a permanent ban on taxes that threaten this engine of economic growth and prosperity. (McCain-Palin 2008, “John McCain’s Jobs For America Economic Plain,” Press Release, 7/7/08)

· John McCain And Governor Palin Will Ban New Cell Phone Taxes. John McCain understands that the same people that would tax e-mail will tax every text message — and even 911 calls. John McCain will prohibit new cellular telephone taxes. (McCain-Palin 2008, “John McCain’s Jobs For America Economic Plain,” Press Release, 7/7/08)

ANNCR: Offshore drilling to reduce gas prices. McCain - Palin. Leadership, experience, for the change we need. JOHN MCCAIN: I’m John McCain and I approved this message.

· John McCain And Governor Palin Will Expand Offshore Drilling To Reduce Gas Prices. McCain: “But I also believe that lifting the moratoria from offshore drilling or oil and natural gas exploration is something that we should place as a very high priority. And again, I don’t want to dictate to the states what they should do, but I think that the states can be provided with additional incentives such as a greater share of the revenues than is presently the case.” (Sen. John McCain, Remarks At Press Availability, Arlington, VA, 6/16/08)

· CNN’s Frank Sesno: “Expectations Of More Production Can Send Prices Down.” FRANK SESNO: “Obama’s criticized McCain for saying more drilling would have a positive psychological impact. But there is psychology in energy markets, worries about soaring demand in China or supply disruptions in Nigeria send prices up. Expectations of more production can send prices down.” (CNN’s “Situation Room,” 6/26/08)

· Harvard Professor And Former Council Of Economic Advisors Chairman Martin Feldstein: “Increasing The Expected Future Supply Of Oil Would Also Reduce Today’s Price.” “Any policy that causes the expected future oil price to fall can cause the current price to fall, or to rise less than it would otherwise do. In other words, it is possible to bring down today’s price of oil with policies that will have their physical impact on oil demand or supply only in the future. For example, increases in government subsidies to develop technology that will make future cars more efficient, or tighter standards that gradually improve the gas mileage of the stock of cars, would lower the future demand for oil and therefore the price of oil today. Similarly, increasing the expected future supply of oil would also reduce today’s price. That fall in the current price would induce an immediate rise in oil consumption that would be matched by an increase in supply from the OPEC producers and others with some current excess capacity or available inventories. Any steps that can be taken now to increase the future supply of oil, or reduce the future demand for oil in the U.S. or elsewhere, can therefore lead both to lower prices and increased consumption today.” (Martin Feldstein, Op-Ed, “We Can Lower Oil Prices Now,” The Wall Street Journal, 7/1/08)

· BMO Financial Group Global Finance Strategist Andrew Busch Wrote That Long Term Solutions To Energy Such As Drilling Can Have A Short Term Affect On Markets. “We need longer term plans to solve the longer term energy problems of United States. In case you aren’t familiar with how markets react, a coherent, logical plan of action towards providing long term solutions will have a positive impact now on the price of energy. Why? Because it will shift the short term psychology of the market away from doom and gloom towards a light at the end of the tunnel scenario. We only need to look at President Bush’s lifting of the moratorium on off-shore drilling to see an example of this in the markets. Did this act significantly change the short term outlook for oil? No, but it changed the discussion on the subject at a time when it was needed. In turn, this aided the shift in market psychology back to some fundamentals like demand…..which is dro pping.” (Andrew Busch, ” Busch: Long Term Energy Plans Can Be Short Term Solutions,” CNBC’s “Guest Blog,” http://www.cnbc.com/id/25803361, Posted 7/22/08)

· Omer Bhatti, The Head Trader At WorldSpreads, Said That The U.S. Offshore Drilling Plan Will Help Lower The Price Of Oil. OMER BHATTI (Head Sales Trader at WorldSpreads): “I think the offshore drilling plan that was agreed in the U.S. kind of helped the scenario to create that pullback scenario.” (CNBC’s “Worldwide Exchange,” 7/28/08)

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post203 Comments »

Comment by 30yrdem-not any more | 2008-09-15 11:36:58

watching McCain on Fox now…no link at fox on line to watch…not that I can find anyway…

Comment by 30yrdem-not any more | 2008-09-15 11:39:22

 

Comment by oh no no no bama | 2008-09-16 05:17:25

On this list Lehman Brothers was Obama’s third largest supporter.

http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?articleId=281474977263615

Change you can believe in.

 
 

Comment by John Smith | 2008-09-15 11:37:36

Obama is only ahead by 5 in NY. If this holds true over the next few weeks this election will become very interesting.

Comment by 30yrdem-not any more | 2008-09-15 11:41:18

Yes it is…I hope McCain takes NY….

Comment by Patti | 2008-09-15 11:43:51

I plan on voting for McCain and I live in NY, in a PRO REBUBLICAN area..

 
 

Comment by SusanUnPC | 2008-09-15 11:41:51

Yes. New Jersey too. Wild, huh.

And Obama’s slippage is affecting down-ticket races in NY and NJ.

Comment by Berserk Ohitler is the embodiment of pure evil | 2008-09-15 11:48:46

RCP national average has McCain up by 2!

 

Comment by Andy | 2008-09-15 12:35:58

SusanUnPC: do you understand VA politics? Today SurveyUSA released a new poll 9/12–9/14 that has Obama up by 4 (from McCain up by 2 & 4 so it’s an 8 pts differential).

 

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-09-15 13:57:17

The Democratic brand is damaged in NY. Eliot Spitzer earlier. David Paterson was well-received, but I think he is vulnerable in the next election. The NYT called for Charlie Rangel to step down. It’s getting pretty bad, and Obama only makes it worse.

 
 

Comment by Arabella Trefoil | 2008-09-15 11:51:02

Obama will get New York into “toss up” territory by the end of September.

 

Comment by oy | 2008-09-15 11:57:19

I believe it is nearly impossible for McCain to win New York. Yet, the very fact that Obama has to fight him there (which is even more unexpected than Minnesota) is a very bad sign for his campaign, which will have to spend some cash to keep his lead in the state.

Comment by PhxNickD | 2008-09-15 12:14:48

I do not think the Republicans have any hope of winning NY and they are probably not spending to much money there. But, Obama is now in a situation where has to spend a lot more of his money there and it has to come from somewhere, meaning less money for states like CO, VA, NV.

Comment by Patti | 2008-09-15 12:21:06

Neither of them have been around this area of NY.

I think NY will give BO a run for his money. He hasnt campaigned in the state. He just assumed everyone would follow him after Hillary won the primary.

I say HA

Comment by Arabella Trefoil | 2008-09-15 12:36:39

I say HA HA HA.

Obama is going to have to spend a lot of money in New York. He is in for a big shock.

New York will be in the “toss up” category by the end of September.

 

Comment by joanie in Brooklyn | 2008-09-15 12:50:10

Agre completely. I say “Ha!” too

 
 

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-09-15 13:59:40

McCain has one campaign office in Long Island, but if the polling trends continue… just imagine! If McCain or Palin showed up in NY, Obama would soil his pants.

 
 

Comment by mimi | 2008-09-15 12:25:43

Sorry oy, but it’s not impossible. The latino vote will be very crucial for 0bama if it stays this close. One swing of the pendulum in this community toward McCain and 0bama’s toast. If he splits the latino vote, there will be a problem. If were McCain, I’d spend my money on some good Spanish advertising. Palin could really appeal to latino women who are very oriented toward motherhood/family. Many are also Catholic so abortion rights is not an issue for them. Her raven looks don’t hurt either.

Also, it’s looking like NY women are a factor as well. There are a lot of upstate Republicans and in the city, look for Staten Island to be red. It always is.

In the beginning I didn’t think my vote would matter. But my motto is now a prophecy for 0bama:

WIN WITHOUT ME!

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-09-15 14:02:18

There are a lot of special needs children among minorities in NYC, because of lead paint, asthma from the pollution and inadequate public schools with rampant ADHD cases. Palin could make inroads there, especially among Hispanics who are Catholic.

 

Comment by lburg | 2008-09-15 16:25:31

Another Hillary supporter turned McCain voter (though I can’t go so far as to say supporter) who thought my vote wouldn’t matter anyway because I live in NY. Swing state? THAT is good news!

 

Comment by TeakwoodKite | 2008-09-15 21:13:53

They don’t call it the Empire State for nothin’.

As long as BO has chosen to spend Money for support he will only recieve IOU’s.

I can barely containt myself thinking about all those SD’s and Dem’s doing the “take the money and run” dance.

Hey BO! See ya, wouldn’t want to be ya!

 
 

Comment by Jaycephus | 2008-09-15 12:51:42

Well, if Obama’s ads keep pushing voters away, McCain won’t have to spend any money in NY to win NY. McCain could be saying: “By all means, Obama, spend MORE money in NY.”

 
 
 

Comment by Kim | 2008-09-15 11:41:29

I just read a great article over at savagepolitics.com titled “Birds of a Feather.” Sorry, I don’t know how to make a clickable link.

Comment by 30yrdem-not any more | 2008-09-15 11:43:40

right click on the address at the top of your page, it turns blue,left click, copy, come here, left click, paste.

Comment by Kim | 2008-09-15 11:49:41

Thank you, 30yrdem.

Comment by 30yrdem-not any more | 2008-09-15 11:54:55

I hope it works for you..

 
 

Comment by 30yrdem-not any more | 2008-09-15 11:59:39

I did that wrong
left click, right click, right click

Comment by TeakwoodKite | 2008-09-15 21:17:07

then a left click past TM scroll till you get south of Houston st and right click in front of ….hey!
Was that BO on skidrow that I just scrolled past?

:) Dam mice.

 
 

Comment by McCain/Palin breaking the many cracks go McCain/Plain | 2008-09-15 14:53:55

Just copy past it.Go to link right click and the click copy.Go to your email and copy there to send to your delf or copy paste here.

 
 
 

Comment by mpr | 2008-09-15 11:42:12

John,
When I read about the NY poll this AM it blew my soxs off!

I thought the one state metric was NJ. Gore was +15.7, Kerry 6.7% and if BOT was < than Kerry the entire Ohio valley was John and Sarah’s.

Well…move over NJ…and HELLLO NEW YORK!!!

 

Comment by Andy | 2008-09-15 11:43:47

There has been a lot of talk about McCain co-opting Obama’s message of change. But I think they are mistaken: McCain has come up with a much more powerful
and appealing message: REFORM. That is what they are talking about.

Reform is a more powerful word for implicit in it is the idea of making something that exists work better. Change is a more radical but iffy word: many are still asking change for what ? And even BO’s supporters cannot explain it. On the other hand, reform that’s easy
to grasp quickly. Reform and “shake things up” is a very appealing and powerful message; and imo it beats “change”.

Comment by tek | 2008-09-15 11:51:53

Yes, I’m afraid Obama’s change would not include the mainstream population and senior citizens would have to leave the counry or be hunted down like dogs. I’m old enough to remember that the mantra of the student revolutionaries was to kill everyone over the age of 30. There were even movies based on that theme. NPR ran a story today about a guy who’s writing a book about how he wishes the boomers would just disappear because IHO we are spoiling his life, taking stuff that he wants for himself, etc. Greedy little bastards.

Comment by NoTrollZone | 2008-09-15 13:36:38

I thought barack the crack head’s motto was:
change you can believe in

but the signs at his rally of the ignorant say
change we need

what’s up with that? While I was dodging seeing the _______, was the motto changed? You know like changed. like change.

change we need?

that’s pretty lukewarm there obambi.

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-09-15 14:07:05

He killed Hope, too.

‘Change We Can Believe In’ was a dig at Hillary who started with the Change message.

That won’t work with McCain, because you can’t convincingly call him a liar.

So now it’s “Change We Need.”

Because people are like, “What change? Why change?”

It’s an advertising gimmick.

Comment by Leisa | 2008-09-15 14:10:39

Now it will be, “We need YOU to change…”

 
 
 
 

Comment by richasis | 2008-09-15 12:15:40

ABSOLUTELY!

 

Comment by vinnie | 2008-09-15 12:21:10

I agree. Anything can be a “change”, including the weather. REFORM, that’s what Mac and Paling should be driving home with the voters.

Comment by jwrjr | 2008-09-15 13:17:57

GWB brought “change” to the country. See how well that worked out?

Comment by Leisa | 2008-09-15 14:15:50

GWB was also a uniter, not a divider…

The parallels of Obama and Shrub are plain as the ears on their eggheads…(I think they both have ears that are fun for cartoonists to exaggerate).

 
 
 
 

Comment by 30yrdem-not any more | 2008-09-15 11:46:29

The Chickens Come Home
http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/

There is an old Puritan ethic called “living within your means.” In modern times the idea of Puritans and being “puritanical” have come in for much satire and even derision. But it is a fact (just as it is a fact that abstinence is the best practice for avoiding unintended pregnancy and STDs) that living within one’s means is the best way to avoid financial calamity.

Too many have ignored this ethic and bought houses they could not afford and their salaries would not support. Too many lending institutions were happy to lend them the money out of a misplaced faith that home prices would escalate without end and that if disaster occurred the federal government could always bail them out.

This would be understood in the Puritan era as greed. Many are now paying the price for their greediness and failure to live within their means.

We should not fear failure. It is often an excellent teacher if one is open to being taught.

Comment by tillthen | 2008-09-15 12:07:17

Thank you, Great message for everyone.

Comment by Rev. Wright, can you fix my garlic nose? | 2008-09-15 13:02:00

The loosening of credit enabled people to succumb to the fearmongering that they’d be priced out of the real estate market forever. Unfortunately, they trusted the smooth talk of unscrupulous lenders instead of their own better judgment.

I heard on the radio that Obama made a statement referencing the Great Depression. During the worst years of the Depression, unemployment was at 25%.
We may be on the threshold of a recession, but the reality of the Great Depression is much worse than what we are currently experiencing.

After all, the young Obots are fully equipped with their Ipods and all the latest tech bells and whistles, are they not?

Comment by Leisa | 2008-09-15 13:36:49

Let us not forget that real estate agents and mortgage brokers work on commissions…

When we moved to North Texas five years ago, we had a real estate agent and mortgage broker trying to push houses on us that we could not ever realistically afford on our budget. The taxes alone were over $1000.00 a month.

Both the real estate agent and the mortgage broker made all of the cases for why we could have it all.

Needless to say, we found a different real estate agent and mortgage broker.

 
 
 

Comment by ginaswo still says no Uhhbama | 2008-09-15 12:11:13

yes 30yr!! my Dar God Bless Him, taught me if I didnt have enough money for soemthing I couldnt afford it and had to wait and save. He told me the only thing I should ever buy without all the money was my house and then to get a fixed rate. And I did and am grateful to my Dar today :0)

good old fashioned salt of the Earth common sense and loving according to your means not your dreams :0)

 

Comment by beebop | 2008-09-15 12:11:59

AMEN … and I am at the point where I believe that people who stay behind in a MANDATORY evacuation should have to pay to be rescued. I have to pay for an ambulance to the hospital and it is an emergency …

 
 

Comment by tek | 2008-09-15 11:47:07

It’s always interesting to check out TL and see what crap they’re spewing. They have it that McCain is totally clueless on the economy and the Dems can now sweep in and take the lead. Unfortunately, the MSM has it that both candidates are struggling to address the economic issues. If the Dems had a brain they would have Hillary on the ticket and she would be sweeping everyone else under rug!

So sad.

Comment by dpvegas | 2008-09-16 04:17:50

Even more interesting is that the Dems have had two years in Congress with which to address all these issues. What have they done? Write stern letters. So not impressed.

 
 

Comment by Mel | 2008-09-15 11:47:38

With the collapse of the banking markets over the week-end, who is a major political person we can point a direct finger at?

Obama, after all let’s not forget his own words in Israel last July, “I am proud of the actions of the banking commitee, and it is my commitee”

Just words Obama?

Comment by Berserk Ohitler is the embodiment of pure evil | 2008-09-15 11:50:15

That’s not the committee I once knew.

 

Comment by bmc | 2008-09-15 12:01:44

ROFL….So, how now, Sen. Obama, what is YOUR BANKING COMMITTEE going to do about the banking crisis that happened on your watch?!

Senator Obama said, trying to impress Israeli reporters, that he is a member of the Senate Banking Committee, as he took credit for the passage of legislation regarding Iran.

“[Obama] was trying to brag about how tough he was on the Iranians, and he said his committee, the Senate Banking Committee, had passed a resolution … that would have caused American firms to divest of Iranian interests. And the trouble is, he’s not on that committee. … And he didn’t vote for it…”.
Indeed, the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs membership roster does not list Obama’s name.

But during a news conference, which aired live Wednesday morning during CNN Newsroom, Obama seemed to embellish his resume:

“Now, in terms of knowing my commitments, you don’t have to just look at my words, you can look at my deeds. Just this past week, we passed out of the U.S. Senate Banking Committee, which is my committee, a bill to call for divestment from Iran, as a way of ratcheting up the pressure to ensure that they don’t obtain a nuclear weapon.”

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brad-wilmouth/2008/07/25/fred-barnes-calls-out-obamas-latest-senior-moment-gaffe

 
 

Comment by Arabella Trefoil | 2008-09-15 11:54:56

When I think of Biden’s home state Delaware,I think “credit cards” and “high interest.”

Maybe it’s just me.

Comment by McHope | 2008-09-15 12:08:23

Well Biden just went on and on about the economic failures in his stump speech and jobs lost in Deleware. Seems to me he is just highlighting his own lack of action.

On FOX, Obama waiting to react to economic issues., continuing to blame McCain. Useless.

Also Lindsay Lohan endorses Obama. She is worried that Lipstick on a pig will overshadow real issues. Well she is the epitomy of lipstick on a pig

AND…
Obama campaign flatly denies making any statemnet about delaying tropop withdrawl.
End of story?

Comment by ohio | 2008-09-15 12:20:30

Well, I just e-mailed fox on the Iraq article and said it needed to be up and on their newsite with the commentators 24/7. As a military mom, I demand it. I heard the “we didn’t do that” and told them it better not be dropped. I’ll e-mail them every hour on the hour if need be. Then I’ll take to the street. I’ve had enough of this fraud.

Comment by Leisa | 2008-09-15 13:42:45

Remember the NAFTA denials?

Obama should be toast… why he seems to survive these credibility issues is a mystery to me.

Comment by tek | 2008-09-15 14:22:40

No mystery. He is the corporate candidate this time around. Prepare to see him sworn in after the Black Panthers and Black Muslims corrupt the voting process to throw the election to him.

My husband was listening to NPR this morning. They interviewed blacks on Obama’s campaign. The people they talked to said they wished Obama would start talking about issues they could relate to. They didn’t know what things like “earmarks” are!

 
 
 

Comment by SJ | 2008-09-15 12:34:23

I was waiting on Biden to talk about the situation today but all I heard from his is nonsense about Mc Cain, big news all over the Media on the economy and all Biden could say is John did this and John did that, what a total waste of time.

 
 

Comment by ginaswo still says no Uhhbama | 2008-09-15 12:12:33

oh not just you!

we call him Biden *D-MBNA

 

Comment by hank48188 | 2008-09-15 15:32:08

Biden sold his house to an Exec from MBNA, the credit card company. It sold for the asking price, $1,200,000. That was probably $100,000 over market value but they like Joe at MBNA, they are his biggest Contributors.

Comment by athena | 2008-09-15 17:35:23

Excuse me……but how did Biden afford that house? He only makes like what? $200,000 a year. (He made 2.2 million over 10 years. You do the math. That kind of salary won’t buy you even a $650,000 house.

 
 
 

Comment by Berserk Ohitler is the embodiment of pure evil | 2008-09-15 11:59:19

Go PUMAs go!

Clinton Supporters Never Say Die
By Shawn Zeller, CQ Staff

Three months after closing her presidential campaign, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton remains a major factor in the race. The big question is how many of her supporters in the Democratic primaries will transfer their enthusiasm or at least their votes to the party’s nominee, Sen. Barack Obama — especially now that Sen. John McCain is running with a woman, Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska, as No. 2 on the Republican ticket.

Pollster William Arnone, a former Clinton adviser, has found that many of the New York senator’s backers are still at risk of defecting to McCain. He surveyed 328 of Clinton’s “most fervent” supporters during the week of the GOP convention in St. Paul and found that 77 percent planned to vote for Obama, 11 percent back McCain, and the rest are either undecided or plan to stay home.

Comment by PhxNickD | 2008-09-15 12:09:35

This is one statistic that has never deviated much since PA (do not recall polls before that). Polls consistently were saying ~23% of Clinton supporters would not support Obama.

 
 

Comment by tek | 2008-09-15 12:03:22

Also, the article downstairs proves that the Democrats refused to impeach Dubya because they wanted the country to be in critical shape so they could stage a coup of their own. That’s why they pushed the Clintons out, they are true democrats, true patriots, true Americans. The Clintons are not far left, they are moderate. Durbin & the boys couldn’t have that, so they dug up Oblahma.

 

Comment by doc99 | 2008-09-15 12:04:52

Captain BS responds, “Hope, Change, Just Speeches, Fired Up.”

 

Comment by Mamatx | 2008-09-15 12:05:25

Comment by Berserk Ohitler is the embodiment of pure evil | 2008-09-15 12:18:08

That’s a GOP site (not the McCain campaign directly) and makes all the connections us PUMAs have been making for a long time: Ayers, Rezko, etc. From that site was a link to a new RNC radio ad.

Transcript:

To listen to the RNC’s new radio ad, click here.

:60 Radio Advertisement

Title: “Change Or More Of The Same?”

VO: Change or more of the same?

That’s the argument Barack Obama has been trying to make.

What about pork-barrel spending?

In 20 plus years in the Senate, John McCain has never sought an earmark. Not once.

As Governor, Sarah Palin vetoed nearly half a billion dollars in wasteful spending and cut earmark requests by hundreds of millions of dollars.

Barack Obama?

In three short years in the Senate, Obama requested nearly a billion dollars in earmarks.

Nearly one billion dollars. That’s over a million dollars for each day he’s been in Washington, D.C.

And Joe Biden?

Biden has been requesting earmarks for decades.

John McCain – Never requested an earmark.

Barack Obama – One billion dollars in earmark requests.

You decide… Who represents change?

John McCain and Sarah Palin will shake up Washington. Barack Obama… more of the same and opposed to real reform.

Comment by Judy L. NC | 2008-09-15 13:44:14

I thought it was a joke - wtf?

 
 
 
 

Comment by bmc | 2008-09-15 12:15:27

Comment by Rev. Wright, can you fix my garlic nose? | 2008-09-15 13:14:21

The Democrats’ margin has shrunk in each presidential election since Bill Clinton won in 1992, and Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry’s 144,000-vote margin was the smallest of all.

That’s why I always say PA is barely blue, or at least purple. The article says it will come down to the Philly burbs. I guess we’ve got our work cut out for us then!
:-)

Comment by Boxer Mum 06 | 2008-09-15 13:41:38

Here is one Democrat residing in the Philly burbs (Montgomery County) that is proudly voting for McCain/Palin and greatly enjoying the many new McCain signs that pop up every day :)

Just saw 3 “Women for McCain” signs pop up in my neighborhood over the weekend.

Comment by Rev. Wright, can you fix my garlic nose? | 2008-09-15 13:46:46

That’s good - maybe PUMA?

I’d give you my contact info so we could brainstorm, but unfortunately the bots are out tonite…

Comment by Boxer Mum 06 | 2008-09-15 14:18:02

I spoke with a neighbor (Iraq veteran) and he was reluctant to post his McCain sign in his yard until he saw MINE! HA! And I’m a democrat!

He gave me the number of the guy in my district who is organizing folks. I’m going to call him and volunteer to drive seniors to the voting centers so their voices will be heard on election day!

I asked my neighbor if he thought they would care if I was a democrat and he laughed and said “no maam!” :)

 
 
 

Comment by TeakwoodKite | 2008-09-15 21:43:39

ACORN squash is a popular dish in the Philly burbs I hear.

 
 

Comment by Judy L. NC | 2008-09-15 14:15:06

I have a hard time believing this line:

First, far more people vote in a primary.

Comment by karen for Clinton (sigh, McPalin now) | 2008-09-15 17:58:37

Who said that?

Not even close. Way less people vote in primaries.

18 million dem primary votes for ob has to translate to 60 million general election day votes for him to win, which even with pets and dead people he is going to have a hell of a time reaching that huge amount.

30 million this year was high for the Dem primary, but that is still roughly half of the General turnout.

 
 
 

Comment by 30yrdem-not any more | 2008-09-15 12:21:16

Election 2008: Utah Presidential Election
Utah: McCain 64% Obama 32%
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/utah/election_2008_utah_presidential_election

The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey in Utah finds John McCain leading Barack Obama by a two-to-one margin, 64% to 32% (see crosstabs).

In June, McCain was ahead by a 52% to 33% margin.

McCain’s #’s continue to go up

Comment by Andy | 2008-09-15 12:24:55

I just saw VA numbers though; SurveyUSA has Obama up by 4: what do you make of this? I don’t understand VA politics much.

Comment by Patrick | 2008-09-15 12:30:48

I saw this too…It seems like an odd one, a bit of an outlier (sp?) like yesterday’s Diageo national poll.

Rasmussen will release a new Virginia today at 6 p.m. If it mirrors that kind of movement, then it is legit, if not, I’d pass it off as an odd outlier.

Take care,
Patrick

Comment by Andy | 2008-09-15 12:49:04

Thanks for the info on Rasmussen; the jump seemed to big ( from -4 to +4 but also if you look at the movements of the various groups men seemed to have gone from +11 McCain to a tie !! I find that hard to believe …

http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReportEmail.aspx?g=c3b77d5f-0d1a-4f6e-b195-ae05355e8eb8

 
 

Comment by 30yrdem-not any more | 2008-09-15 12:46:54

I know BO has been registering voters there very heavily, I don’t see the #’s on how many dem-rep -indy were polled…
http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReportEmail.aspx?g=c3b77d5f-0d1a-4f6e-b195-ae05355e8eb8

Comment by Andy | 2008-09-15 12:50:03

You are right I was looking for the same and they have no info on that…

 
 
 
 

Comment by Andy | 2008-09-15 12:23:41


Barack Obama who is the #2 recipient of lobbying handouts, out of 354 lawmakers, from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

This is scandalous. It is absolutely amazing BO has had the face to attack HRC on lobbysist.

BO serves at the pleasure of BO politcal career.

Comment by Jaycephus | 2008-09-15 13:14:04

This is just crazy. A pseudo-corporation with govt-selected boardmembers, such as Jamie Gorelick, who give ‘lobbyist handouts’. Obama is the number two recipient? The whole thing is atrocious. And the entire thing ought to be the biggest scandal being covered right now, and all Republican and Democrat politicians involved in it ought to be being called to task right now by an ‘unbiased’ media.

But I doubt there will even be a peep about any improper activities until well after the elections. Too many critical ‘battlegrounds’ at stake.