“Do Whatever You Must To Trick Former Hillary Supporters Into Voting For Barack”
By Uppity Woman on September 27, 2008 at 8:00 AM in Bamboozling, Barack Obama, Current Affairs, Hoodwinking, Obama's Thugs
Freedom Fairy tipped me off to this post that appeared on HuffPo. I found a link to a copy of it posted by OTY at Dr. Lynette Long’s place.
No kidding. You can’t make this shit up. Somebody actually wrote this in a moment of delusion or something. Apparently, the writer also imagined that the post wouldn’t get back to us. It’s also another typical example of how surrepticious, insincere and downright dishonest Obama people can be. Note the word “trick”. This person is apparently still hallucinating that all of us Hillary supporters are “downscale” and “low information. It could be she’s just rattled from one of Barack’s Vibrating Cell Phone routines. At least we don’t pretend we can stand Barky.
These people are a real day at the beach! I guess this is a hyped-up version of break her jaw and then come home with flowers.
Brilliant. Great idea. Work on that will ya? See how well it works out for you. Trick This.
Do Whatever You Must to Trick Former Hillary Supporters into Voting for Barack
Eat Crow? Hell Yes, to Win This Election
The Obama team is suddenly making a huge effort to gain women’s votes, but many die-hard Hillary supporters — dozens of my acquaintances — remain bruised and confused. The fact that Palin is on the ticket when HRC wasn’t even vetted may turn out to have been the major gaffe of Axelrod and Company, and the tipping point of this tight election.
If you’ve been an outspoken Obama supporter from the beginning, it’s time to make amends with Hillary supporters you know. Arguing with, or browbeating them to get on board is counterproductive, but showing you’ve come around to respecting Hillary may ease their hurt enough to do the trick. (Even if you don’t mean it. This is politics.)
Here’s what you can do:
Eat crow. To get started, memorize this phrase, take a deep breath and say: “Now that I see how unqualified Sarah Palin is, I realize how I misjudged Hillary Clinton. Even Biden said she would have made a great vice president.” Saying you wish she were the presidential nominee may go too far, and you may not be able to get it out. But if the Hillaryite brings it up, don’t argue, and see below
Let the HRC voter vent.You may have to draw on every bit of patience you have. You may have to hear once again how unfair it is that the Repubs chose Palin, and the Dems ignored Hillary, and that the party would assuredly be ahead if she were anywhere on the ticket. You may have to hear old-news complaints about sexism and Jack Cafferty’s curmudgeonly comments, David Shuster’s pimping Chelsea insult, the Monica mentions, the tougher debate questions for Hillary. Do not look like you want to run and soak your head in vodka, even if you do. Do not talk unless asked. Listening without argument is the major way to keep this potential voter attainable.
Act empathic. Nod your head in agreement when the subject of Palin or Chris Matthews or Keith Olbermann’s Hillary-bashing commentary is mentioned. Learn these phrases and use them every so often: “I imagine it must be hard.” “It must seem unfair.” “I know, you wanted to see an accomplished woman as president in your lifetime.” “I can understand your being hurt (sad, mad, furious, despondent, livid, resentful, apoplectic, intransigent, inconsolable, red-faced, nauseous, wretched, shit-faced”). Again, do not argue. Just listen.
Do not praise Obama.I know, this seems ridiculous, but now is not the time in this chain of events. Also, do not praise Michelle or their daughters. If the HRC supporter praises, agree and move on. This is not so much about Obama as it is the closure about Hillary’s run, which remains a wound to some. Take a breath, and move to the next step, which may be the hardest.
Praise HRC.Never mention her flaws. Be gracious and do not bring up her vote for the war, or her “dirty campaign.” Do not allude to Bill. Instead, try to find something you can praise with some conviction — some version of “By the end of the campaign I could understand why people were so enthusiastic about Senator Clinton (not “Hillary”). I saw her toughness, her brains, her heart.” “She is gracious and helpful in defeat.” And especially, “Sarah Palin is no Hillary Clinton.” You may have to go back to steps one and two. Nobody said this would be easy.
Know your anti-female McCain political facts.Here comes the logic. Make a cheat-sheet if necessary. If Palin can get past her ignorance about The Bush Doctrine and the Constitution in prime time, you can learn these few talking points. Remind HRC supporters that several Supreme Court nominees (and Roe v Wade) are in the balance. Discuss McCain/Palin’s ultra-conservative record, and stands on right- to- life, guns, creationism, you name it. You’ll need to do some homework here. Wikipedia and Google are there for you at all times.
Know your anti-female McCain emotional facts. If the above doesn’t do it, remain low-key, with a pleasant visage. Remind HRC supporters that McCain left his disfigured first wife who waited loyally for him and raised their children alone, to have an affair with Cindy, the current, rich, much younger wife. But aha, continuing this behavior, he probably cheated on this trophy with blonde lobbyist, Vicky Isenman. (Where is this woman? In a rendition prison in Syria till after the election? Hello, National Enquirer.) Remind the Hillary fan that McCain called his $300k-suited trophy wife the C- word in public, and has a notoriously terrible temper. And worst of all, and leave this for the climax of this entire exercise: McCain publicly laughed at the allusion to HRC as a “bitch” and — lowest of the low — made that public Chelsea Clinton ugly joke when she was just a teen.
Know your Palin political and emotional facts. Emphasize that Palin is against almost everything that Hillary stands for. List these things. Be sure to mention that she called Hillary “a whiner.” Then ask, “Do you really want this undeserving woman to break the glass ceiling before someone as deserving and qualified as Hillary Clinton?”
If you did your best but it didn’t work, leave the door open. Don’t lose it and attack the HRC supporter for being stupid, intransigent, short-sighted, emotional, unpatriotic, and thinking with her nether regions, even if those feelings are coursing inside you. Do not use the term “bitch,” even though McCain did.
Hillary supporters may not want to tell you that you’ve reached them. Assume it will take a few tries. And even if these voters don’t admit they’ve changed their minds, at a minimum, your attempt at taking one for the team may influence them enough to keep them from voting for McCain, or bad-mouthing Obama’s so-far wobbly candidacy.
If each die-hard Obama supporter could convince even one disgruntled HRC supporter that he or she respects Hillary Clinton, it just might help secure this election. Even if you still don’t like HRC, consider yourselves citizen-patriots, suck it up, and do your part to save our country. And fast, please.
Was this written by a woman?
This article has GOT to be satire.
Please tell me it’s a send-up…
If it’s not, oh my god, why don’t they just cut to the chase and tell the 0bots to slip a roofie in the Hillary supporter’s drink before they drag her to the polls and force her to vote for Zero.
UFB.
I think its true, because on the GTN site Zee mentioned to one guy that he never said any thing nice about Hillary during the primary and was thus suspicious. AMEN, now it makes sense why they are busy reaching out to Hillary supports that are women (while telling us about the bad that Palin represents) and hanging out at women sites. WOW!
Kill the $150 Billion ACORN payout in Bail Out Bill in Congress!
If you believe that Congress should stop putting earmarks and pork in the Bail Out Bill please sign the petition attached below.
http://www.rallycongress.com/americansforleadership/1228/a-call-to-the-house-and-the-senate-“-do-not-add-ear-marks-into-the-bail-out-bill-or-you-will-not/
Note: Use the Free option to send.
Thanks,
[ADMIN: Please don't post this again. You've posted it in every thread. And I don't like the idea of suggesting to our readers that they sign a petition, giving out their personal information without knowing who's going to get hold of that information. Also, online petitions are never taken seriously because anyone can create a list of names. It is best to write directly to one's senators and representative -- http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov ]
I just sent letters from myself and my husband. I think this is very important and a great system to use. I hope everyone jumps on this and we get ACORN and earmarks out of this bill.
I wish we could send similar letters to CNN, MSNBC, NBC, ABC, etc protesting their biased reporting of the candidates. ANyone know how to do this?
This morning just before signing in I was thinking that the US media has almost completely become a “state controlled” outlet as in Russia, Cuba, and other communist and socialist contries. And if Obambi is elected with the radical Dem congress we now have lead by Pelosi and Reid they will pass the “fairness doctrine (which is an oxymoron) and we will officially have a state controlled media.
I agree with you!
Here is a link to a media contact list:
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=111
I added La Raza (translation:”The Race”)to my list…they are entrenched in our Tucson public schools teaching the students to hate America and promote taking America back for Mexico. They have bussed students to pro-illegal rallies on school time to march with the Mexican flag…while there is an uproar amongst a lot of citizens, this is a very liberal city with both local news papers in bed with the pro-illegal groups.
I added La Raza also.
I actually got a letter back from Sherrod Brown — one of my Senators — who is on the banking committee. Not the form letter crap, but a more specific form letter saying that the original was bad law. Keep this up. It is obviously having some impact.
I sent a non-form letter separately saying that I would vote AGAINST Democrats until I could no longer pull a lever.
Click on the link in my piece. The link to the ORIGINAL column is there. It’s real. It happened. I just make it a policy to never link directly to Huffpo. But the real piece is there if you click on my link. Like I said, you can’t make this shit up.
Actually this is not the First “advice”. I posted another one awhile back that was equally ludicrous.
Lea Lane - sounds like a woman!
I had convinced myself that if it was not satire, it had to be written by a man. Silly me.
Ok I updated it and included the actual link, much as I hate sending traffic there. So now you KNOW it’s real without having to click on two links instead of one.
uppity — the Huff Post article seemed to confirm how much Obama and his crowd hate women. There is nothing they can say that will ever get me to vote for Obama. 42% of Hill Dems have said they would not vote for Obama and that number has held steady since June. When you trash a woman we admire and when the party tells us we aren’t needed and they can replace us–ITS OVER. Obama pissed in his chips–and I do so hate pissed in chips.
here’s an interesting post form your ink to huffy poo. If it’s true, then BOBO hasn’t evolved much past his teen age years.
legalgal See Profile I’m a Fan of legalgal I’m a fan of this user permalink
Obama made a HUGE mistake in announcing his VP choice that remains unaddressed. He was so injured and infuriated by Hillary over the 3am White House ads when she dared to question his ability to lead. So what does he do? He sends her the news, and the rest of us, that she is not his choice - in a 3am cell phone text. Guess he got to show her which phone she was answering. He still doesn’t get this as an unspoken but very telling fact about how he deals with rejection.
What happens when he’s dissed by unfriendly types. Will be make sure to get even? We’ve got one of those already in the White House.
Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 PM on 09/25/2008
Actually, after Obama was handed the nomination by the DNC in June, the Ozombies were already employing these ridicuous methods. I responded then to the slimy DK posters that I respected them more when they were attacking HRC supporters . . . that their new-found love for HRC just sounded desperate and phony.
I guess they didn’t like my response at DK and was thus banned summarily from the site. I checked a couple of weeks ago, but I still can’t post—not that I really want to because I’ve been boycotting this and other pro-Obama sites for a while now. I’ve said the same things on MyDD but have not been banned thus far. Still it gets pretty nasty there.
Hmm, the ones in my neighborhood need to get with the program, then.
They’re still taking shots at me and calling me a Republican and a sore loser.
My dumbass nephew still sends articles mocking Hillary. They go straight to spam.
I don’t think the kind of people attracted to blogging for Obama are capable of “eating crow”.
This OBAMBI CHEATING PRACTICE should be read by every Hillary supporter.
Remember when Obambi said in March:
“I can have all of Hillary’s supporters if I get the nomination, but she won’t be able to get any of mine!” — ha!
Well, it’s arrogance payin’ back time for Sweetie!
Mary, do you have a cite for that? I’d like to share that with the “Hillary supporter talking points” when talking with my fellow Hillary supporters about why they should discount these far-too-little, far-too-late attempts.
If women had stuck together and supported Hillary like blacks came together for Obama, she would be the Democratic nominee. As for Democratic unity, look how the party treated Hillary during the primaries and remember who Obama is and what was said about Hillary and her supporters.
and he now assembles a “truth squad” in McCaskill’s state to insulate himself from Kharma
btw, hope: great name!
You people are letting your little snit block out the big picture. Time to let go of your petulance. The world can’t handle another four years of republicans.
What’s the matter Obot - worried about your unqualified messiah ? I have seen more and more of you over here on Larry’s site - must be getting scared.
This isn’t CNN or MSNBC blog where they kiss Obambis ass and let you Obots run rampant and won’t post any negative comments - this is Larry’s blog and he lets us speak up !! Go back to the CNN blog Troll.
Mel - Too bad. I’m not an O-Bot, but I sure do believe that McCain is finished. And after that Palin fiasco “… Putin… where is he going … , ” which has to be one of the funniest interviews ever ever, there will be no “UP” for McCain.
This is a great site, and Larry has done a good job. The funniest thing I have found about this site, is the anger. I have never seen so much profanity, and childish “anti-obama” name-handles. It reminds me of fifth grade in San Francisco at St. Gabriel’s Grammar School. Where are the nuns to tell you all to grow up.
GROW UP!
You are wrong - while Obama did better in the debate then I expected him to - the public knows he had alot more time than McCain ( who was actually doing his job in Washington) to get ready.
If Palin knocks it out of the park next week -
Obama is the one who is finised. I’ve watched a video of Sara Palin debating and she is quite good - I am hoping she will suprise many people.
Also Zogby had McCain up 48 to 46. Rasmussen and
Gallop within 3 - so don’t know what you are talking about Phil - it is still a Horse Race.
Virginia + 5 for Obama, Florida -1.
Its the individual states that are important. McCain’s leads in these states that Bush won by 8 or 9 have McCain just by 1 or 2.
Now on the other hand, Obama should be much higher, but my predictions, as it is Obama’s to lose, is that its a 58-60% Obama Victory.
The big problem is not McCain - its Palin. I never had a problem with McCain until he selected Palin. And her sell-by date has come and gone, and the polls show it.
LMAO!!
Less than one week away….OCTOBER.
Check back with us then and we’ll discuss the pll results. Better yet, you could leave your pager number and we’ll send you a text message at 3 a.m.
phil
you don’t know what you’re talking about .. .it’s obama that’s the problem and biden is well past his sell by date for sure biden is so full of gaffes it’s pathetic!
mccain/palin
nobama ever!
If Palin was so ineffective, why would Obama and company, which includes MSM, work so hard to smear her?
I thought the debate was a draw - that people who had already decided could find things to support their position and the undecideds would remain so. The thought that kept going through my mind was that Bush was the one who lost because he couldn’t hold a candle to either of these two guys. Hopefully the debate helped restore confidence in our country, both here and abroad.
I spoke to a friend this morning who was a Hillary supporter, but supported Obama after she lost. My friend thought McCain was too much of a warmonger and that Palin was a terrible pick. So I was shocked when she said she thought Obama was terrible in the debate and was impressed by McCain. She is clearly wavering now.
We are not as disliked abroad as some might think. I lived in a Muslim country for nearly 3 years right in the middle of this war. When we moved back to the U.S. my husband got an e-mail from one of his Muslim co-workers that said “despite our religious, cultural, and racial differences I have much respect for you. YOU are MY American Idol.”
mccain beat obama and will win in november “the bradley effect” will prevail in addition to the fact that that the repugs have an october surprise that will reveal the fraud for what he is . . a fraud!
mccaib/palin 2008
Mel - Obama + 6 in todays (Saturday) National Poll. Iowa Obama +5, Virginia 5+, as well.
Oh well, only statistics, like your 18 Million I guess!
really? you only seem to be cheing polls that favor cherry-pick your own candidate.
From Realpolitics.com - a conservative site.
Colorado 50.2 44.8 Obama +5.4
Ohio 45.1 46.3 McCain +1.2
Florida 46.0 47.6 McCain +1.6
Pennsylvania 48.2 43.8 Obama +4.4
Missouri 45.8 49.0 McCain +3.2
Virginia 48.0 46.2 Obama +1.8
Rasmussenreports provide the most consistent polling however, but realpolitics is the best at summing up all the data.
Phil the only state you listed where McCain has to do some work is Colorado. remember McCain didn’t even campaign last week.
He campaigned until Wednesday, but the campaign still ran ads, and both Palin and He did interviews. And his handlers were phoning around - isn’t that campaining?
if it is then BOBO campaigned in Florida during the primaries after taking the pledge not to.
Poor Phil, we select our presidents by the electoral college, not polls.
these polls don’t even include mccain’s triumph over obama in the debate!
mccain/palin 2008!
Philly, the only polls that matter is November 4th.
I will be sooo happy when people like you get your comeuppance.
Unlike Obama and his “I have a bracelet’ comment or his 57 or 48 or however many states he thinks there are.
He had to look at the bracelet to read the name.
That would be coming from your fellow-travelers, the obamabots. This site is fine when these drags on society aren’t around. My analysis is that your observational skill are el zilcho, goob. Go over to your friends at HuffPo is you want to post this sort of drivel.
If you have to deny you’re an obot, you are, indeed, an obot.
Well, I’m no Obot but even I can see things are swinging Bambi’s way.
No one is paying attention to the details anymore (even tho I wish they would).
MOST are only sure of ONE THING and that is they do NOT want republicans in charge of ANYTHING for at least 4 yrs.
IT could be just about anyone with a D this time around. And the more Bambi looks reasonable (that’s the highest bar he needs to pass for the D’s) the easier it will be for him.
I am sick to my stomach over it but I’m afraid it’s true. It’s NOT just the media. It’s everyone I know under 35 and every D I know (except 3 now) will be out in force to kick the R’s to the curb this year!
sorry
and I’m really sorry they screwed Hillary
(maybe she’ll find a way to keep bambi in check but I’m more worried about his sicko wife)
ack
Pretty disgusting that they’ll vote for Obama because “he held his own” or he was “good enough” during the debate. Sure doesn’t take much to become the leader of the free world anymore.
Did anybody see those people on Fox who said they were undecieded, but BO sawyed them. I don’t buy that for a moment. I think think they are democrats who don’t want to vote for him.
I don’t know. I used to think Luntz was in the tank for Repugs and then I started watching his shows and was thinking it was pretty even.
If someone asked me right now I would be honest and say
I don’t KNOW if I’ll be voting (that is the truth)
even though I’ve filled out my absentee ballot I’m waiting until I see Palin vs Biden
but I’ll never vote for BHO
maybe they would ask me to participate if I left that last sentence out of the interview!
lol
I saw that segment and it was complete bs. Those folks were not undecided, they were Obama plants. No one watches a debate as an undecided, then afterward starts booing one candidate. How stupid does Fox think everyone is?
Don’t worry, after that bailout deal is finished we may soon hear more about the way this thing was about to go before McCain rolled up his sleeves and did his job. Obama? On the campaign trail–he can be reached by phone if needed, which he isn’t!
The markets are in dire need of stability so much of the back room fiasco has not come to light. Lawmakers are in an emergency session as we speak. Pelosi wanted to push the original proposal and go home but she doesn’t want the country to see her turn out the lights this time.
“It’s everyone I know under 35 and every D I know (except 3 now) will be out in force to kick the R’s to the curb this year!”
Perhaps you are too young to remember but it was that way in 2004 with Democrats voting for Kerry to kick out Bush - all the Dems were SURE they would win - and Bush still won.
Just because you know a bunch of people under 35 doesn’t mean jack. Most of this country leans red in the best of times. Even moderate Democrats have a hard time getting elected president. That’s the truth of it.
Older people are the consistent and reliable voters and they are less likely to vote for Obama. Younger people are just not very reliable voters.
My older son is 33 and an Obama supporter but he is not even registered to vote! He keeps saying he will get around to registering. I used to encourage him to register. Now I say nothing.
My daughter is a registered Obot. She is 28. However she did not vote in the primary and in 2006 she wasn’t sure if she was voting at the right polling place. Oh, well.
My middle son is registered and I am pretty sure he will vote. So that is one out of three younger Obot voters who I am sure will vote. What I am absolutely sure of is that this old bitter Hillary harridan will vote for McCain.
Rita, my dear husband was going to vote for Obama in the primary. I just didn’t mention it to him and he forgot to vote.
Now he’s voting McCain. The Ayers thing did it. He’s a liberal, but he’s a law and order type.
Stay positive! I have been voting for over 40 years dem; this year, it’s McCain.
The freak gave himself away. Anyone indoctrinated in that liberal America Hating town is a certified Kool Aid drinker.
Hell, they don’t even need to drink the Kool Aid. It already courses from their veins. They are a source.
I lived in that Liberal Mecca Wasteland for 25 years. It used to actually be “Progressive”. But now it’s full of America Hating vile.
It’s a “Safe Haven” for violent criminal illegal aliens. No Joke. SF and Berserkely have “Safe Haven” status in their charters now, and it includes protection for violent criminals.
Obama is safe there.
Half of our problem in San Francisco is we get the runaways from incestuous relationships ( from cities like yours), drug addicts, nuts, and losers that couldn’t make it out here. Its why our budget is so higher - higher than the State of Alaska, but that’s not hard to accomplish either
We are a great city, diverse, and mixed politically. Its still the number one destination for many in the world to visit. Within an hour of the city are beautiful beaches, redwoods, canyons and mountains.
You obviously dont know what you are talking about. And should I also remind you that in San Francisco, we have great house values. A house purchased in 1980, going for 1.5 million. Lots of good liberals here obviously - we read, and knuckledrag rarely, although it is fun to log on here and imagine the knuckledraggers on the other side of the keyboard, thinking up witty things about Obama.
The interesting thing about McCain and Palin is that all you have to do is just play back the feed - no editing, and its funny alread. MST3000 could have a great time with Palin talking about Putin!
[ADMIN: WHAT A FINE EXAMPLE OF AN OBAMA SUPPORTER YOU MAKE -- HURLING GRATUITOUS, GROSS INSULTS. We won't miss your mindless attacks.]
LOL, wow. $1.5 mill houses. Yes, that’s truly “in touch” with the average American. I guess that’s why housing prices in the Bay Area plummeted as foreclosures increased.
They probably pump kool-aid through the drinking fountains in their schools.
If I were you, I would brag about the “Palin fiasco” — we have been dealing with the fiasco that is the gaffe-meister Joe Biden on a daily basis. This boob may have experience in the Senate but his problem is he opens his mouth and gets in so much trouble — he could start an international incident. I have feared this for years.
And when Joe Biden campaigns down south telling peple they need to vote for Sen. Obama becaues he is black — well, if he the only reason he thinks we should vote for him is because he is a ’symbol’ — it sounds to me like that’s the team that is desperate.
Gee Phil, I guess you are a little backward yourself for spending time on a site you believe is childish. Given the heaps and mounds of ugliness and name calling by the Obamites during the entire primary and continuing thru the GE, its no wonder we dont vent a bit with our own name inventions. Notice an important difference, we arent spending time on pro-Obama sites doing the name calling. NQ’ers and other independents are reading articles here and commenting here, so if you are looking to find a reason to be overly-sensitive, well perhaps you’ve found it. btw dont visit HuffPost because it’s really ugly. And you might really get your feelings hurt.
McCain finished? Hardly, he is just getting started kicking Obama’s sorry little butt. Ive never seen anyone running for office that went through so many facial expressions during a debate. Obama has got real thin skin, he can dish it but he cant take it.
who’s talking Phil Murphy, Obama’s campaign Financial manager, always begging for money for Obama’s Campaign. How’s the money begging going Phil Murphy?
Liar! You send me mail all the time begging for money fro OBAMA CAMPAIGN! It’s signed phil Murphy finance manager. OBOT PAID TROLL IDIOT DEK SiCKIN
Phil,
You have posted quite frequently on this site. I have responded to many of your “hit and run” posts where you make far-fetched statements and then move on.
My responses have always been to the point, fact filled and with links.I have asked you nicely in a variety of ways to respond by refuting or confirming my responses to you.
To date…I can not locate ANY response from you to my comments.
What does that tell you Phil?
It appears to me that you are trying to promote an image of ‘Sincerity and concern (Gee…where have I seen that before…hmmmm-oh yes-Sen obama is doing the same thing!)
Your tone is becoming more polite and flattering with each of your posts =while at the same time you make ridiculous generalizations-with no support whatsoever for your comments.
Gee, Phil…if you are a genuine blogger seeking to contribute to or learn from the discussion-then…why dont you ever respond to any legitimate questions posed to you by bloggers? WHy do you ignore all ‘non-emotional, fact based blogger comments?
Why are your comments always one-sided?
Just wondering…
And Phil…
Have a great day.
The only problem with this article’s “Tips on How to Persuade
the bitch’sHillary’s Supporters” is that 0bots could NEVER follow this recommendation:0bots just can’t contain their hatred of the Clintons. Some kind of weird and virulent OCD takes over when the word “Clinton” is even mentioned.
0bots make rightwingers look like rank amateurs in the Clinton-hater playoffs.
Right on Bracelet - and love your name!!
When Obambi said that “I have a bracelet too” he reminded me of a six year old !!
Funny how that “six year old boy” won the debates. Time gave him an A- to McCain’s B-.
And McCain had to win. Now that Palin is back in the closet for a ROM upgrade for next debate, John can concentrate on getting a better set of facial expressions for the next debate so he doesn’t look so desperate.
He will have to think of another strategy instead of canceling the campaign, like, ” I need to go to Ft. Knox to count gold bricks to stop their devaluation!”
lmao!
time is in the tank for obama, just like the rest of the media/msm, or maybe you forgot the countless front positive covers of obama.
You are full of crap Phil - Time/ AOL /
CNN / CBS/ MSNBC are all in the TANK FOR
WAFFLES - OBAMBI.
The real people do not listen to the media any more - they lied to us about W, they lied to us about Iraq and they dahm sure lied about Obama - had they done their job and reported the Reverand Wright, Ayers, and Rezko connections - your precious Obambi would not even be the nominee.
Go back and play on CNN or MSNBC with all the other Obots !!
Mel - Sounds like you better retune your aluminum foil hat to get a better signal, as the world of the MSM must be out to get you.
Duck, run, and hide, and water the mushrooms please!
Hey phil–Please take my advice and study the Obama “tricks” a little more. Honestly, you guys are as stupid as Obama. Do you stutter when you lie, too? I heard that’s one of the nasty side effects of the kool-aide. Take it slow…drink slowly and in small amounts. Ok?
Yes. Phil forgot the critical and time-honored TIP #3:
Hey Phil, go away and let us vent for a year or so. Maybe President McCain will help us JUST GET OVER IT!
Maybe you should watch this Palin Video. Especially where she talks about Putin flying over head “.. where is he go-en!”
Ah, very good. Now you are following the script:
From the anti-HRC until we need her supporters Bag of Tricks, TIP #8
Phil Murphy acts like that little college student who hacked Palin’s email a couple weeks ago. William Ayers probably paid him to get on the internet & blog for Obama.
Sorry - 52 year old, retired administrator of a Hospice in San Francisco. I have worked with computers though since late seventies - DEC, Prime, Unix, you name it.
Funny though how I dont need to use funny names and poddy talk to discuss politics.
What is it with this site that brings out the baby talk, and poddy talk to discuss politics?
Yeah you’ve made your lame joke repeatedly.
You think were are childish….we got it.
The probelm is at this point, you are coming off like Uncle Chester who is friends with Gary Glitter.
Give it a rest….it is just plain creepy at this point.
we are
You were 53 the other day. Saying you were an administrator of a “hospice” sounds nice, except that hospice is a concept, not a building. Not denying that some nursing homes offer hospice care to suck off Medicare, but if you managed a “hospice” it was more likely a group of home visitors. And funny how you mention the old computers. I suppose you’ll say you worked on Sigma VII next.
FInd a post where I said 53. I will be a couple of months though.
Go do some research on San Francisco Hospices. Check out Coming Home.
Hospice is a philosophy, but also a location. We provided Medi-Cal and Medicare Hospice services to people in their home, nursing home, RCFE, etc…
Sigma VII - nope. Dont even know what that is.
I apologize, you did say 52.
As to Coming Home, it is practically famous among hospices. Too bad it isn’t the one where you are mentioned:
http://www.growthhouse.org/report.html
ASCII text version
Growth House, Inc.
Directory of San Francisco Bay Area Resources for
Grief And Life-Threatening Illness
(ASCII text version. Last Update: 13 May 2008)
Crossroads Home Care And Hospice
320 Judah Street, Suite 7
San Francisco CA 94122
415-682-2111; 888-CROSSROADS
415-682-2112 fax
crossroads_hospice@msn.com
Provides skilled nursing and palliative care services to
terminally-ill persons in their own residences or in congregate
settings. Does not operate its own residential facility but will
contract with congregate service providers and private individuals.
Has been in existence since January 1996. Provides one-on-one grief
counseling and makes referrals to grief support groups. Provides
general referrals related to terminal illness support. Works with a
general population that includes clients affected by AIDS. Medicare
and MediCal certified.
Fee for service; Medicare certified.
Phil Murphy, President
There’s another Crossroads location, with a storefront type building I don’t know how to post a picture of,
(415) 682-2111
(415) 682-2112 (Fax)
1109 Vicente Street # 104,
San Francisco, CA 94116
http://www.sfhospice.com
Products & Services:
Counseling
Hospice Services
Occupational Therapy
Physical Therapy
(the internet link seems dead).
This location has an old history, but things about service don’t change that much:
http://web.userinstinct.com/3337905-crossroads-home-care-hospice.htm
1997 ? data
SHORT TERM HOME HEALTH AGENCIES
Services provided by CROSSROADS HOME CARE AND HOSPICE, INC:
Dieticians (Number of full-time equivalent dieticians employed by a facility): 0.25
Program participation (Indicates if the provider participates in Medicare, Medicaid, or both programs): MEDICARE AND MEDICAID
Registered nurses (The number of full-time equivalent registered professional nurses employed by a provider): 4
Srv: occupational therapy (Indicates how occupational therapy services are provided): PROVIDED UNDER ARRANGEMENT
Srv: pharmacy (Indicates how pharmacy services are provided): PROVIDED UNDER ARRANGEMENT
Srv: physical therapy (Indicates how physical therapy services are provided): PROVIDED UNDER ARRANGEMENT
Type of facility (Indicates the category which represents the type of facility): ALCOHOL AND/OR DRUG HOSPITAL
Aide training/competency programs (Indicates how the agency provides home health aide training and competency evaluation programs): NEITHER
Branch operation indicator (Indicates if the agency operates any branches): No
Change of ownership indicator (Indicates if a home health agency has undergone a change of ownership since the last survey): No
Hha qualified for opt (Indicates if a home health agency is qualified to provide outpatient physical therapy/speech services): No
Home health aides (Number of full-time equivalent home health aides employed by a home health agency or hospice): 0.50
Hospice indicator (Indicates if the home health agency also participates in the Medicare program as a hospice): No
Social workers (The number of full time equivalent social workers employed by the agency): 1
Srv: appliance and equipment (Indicates how appliance and equipment services are provided by a home health agency): PROVIDED UNDER ARRANGEMENT
Srv: home health aide/homemaker (Indicates how home health aide services are provided by a home health agency): COMBINATION
Srv: medical social (Indicates how medical social services are provided): COMBINATION
Srv: nursing (Indicates how nursing services are provided): COMBINATION
Srv: nutritional guidance (Indicates how nutritional guidance services are provided): PROVIDED BY STAFF
Srv: speech therapy (Indicates how speech therapy services are provided): PROVIDED UNDER ARRANGEMENT
Subunit indicator (Indicates if the agency is a subunit of another agency): No
Subunit operation indicator (Indicates if the agency operates any subunits): No
Srv: laboratory (Indicates how laboratory services are provided): PROVIDED UNDER ARRANGEMENT
Compliance: plan of correction (Indicates if a provider is in compliance with program requirements based on an acceptable plan for correction of deficiencies): COMPLIANCE BASED ON ACCEPTABLE POC
Compliance: status (Indicates if a provider or supplier is in compliance with program requirements): IN COMPLIANCE
Current survey date (The date of the health or life safety code survey, whichever is later. the “official” survey date for the provider): Apr 1997
Eligibility code (Indicates if a facility is eligible to participate in the Medicare and/or Medicaid programs): ELIGIBLE TO PARTICIPATE
Participation date (The date a facility is first approved to provide Medicare and/or Medicaid services): Apr 1997
*************************
However, none of this proves or disproves that you are this Phil Mu