RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Barack Obama’s Revolutionary Buddies

(bumped up by SusanUnPC)

Why do folks who sought the violent overthrow of the U.S. Government want Barack Obama as President? Aaron Klein broke news last week with this tidbit:

One of the main founders of the Weathermen terrorist organization is a signatory to an independent organization acting to ensure the election of Sen. Barack Obama, WND has learned.

The group in question, Progressives for Obama, also includes among its ranks many former members of the 1960s radical organization Students for a Democratic Society, from which the Weathermen splintered, as well as current and former members of other radical organizations, such as the Communist Party USA and the Black Radical Congress.

In its creed, first published in March in the Nation magazine, the Progressives for Obama founders state their organization descended from the “proud tradition of independent social movements that have made America a more just and democratic country.

So what you say? Watch this video and then tell me, “so what.”

It is not a question of what Ayers was doing when Barack was 8 years old. No. It is a question of why Barack has hidden the beginning of his relationship with Ayers in the 1990s and why Obama and Ayers became fixtures on two public foundations and why Obama, working with Ayers, steered money to radical groups. Those are the relevant questions.

And what is Obama’s explanation. Just some guy he knew in the neighborhood. Barely knew the dude. Here’s David Axlerod trying to spin this turd:

(Here’s a link to just Axlerod’s ramblings.)

If Americans want to elect a guy who buddied around with an unrepentant terrorist, so be it. But let’s make sure people know the truth before they vote.

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post250 Comments »

Comment by Not Your sweetie | 2008-10-06 09:05:33

Comment by Kelvin Hearts PUMAs | 2008-10-06 09:07:21

No sweetie. The economy needs to be discussed more. That’s why you’re losing.

Comment by Soldier of Christ | 2008-10-06 09:17:07

Who is losing? The gloves are off, child .Your bi-sexual pig is going down with the likes of what we saw last night. The dots were put together for the American people. I had a hardcore democrat in my living room last night and purposely put the Sean Hannity special report, and their mouth dropped. They looked at me and said “OMG, Farranhuk, Bill Ayers and the other muslim guy that helped him in college live right down the street from Obama? What is going on here? What kind of friends that this guy have?

THE DOTS WERE PUT TOGETHER LAST NIGHT—AND THESE DOTS WILL BE HIS DOWNFALL—-HE IS A CELL!!

Comment by Robert | 2008-10-06 09:23:11

hahahhahahah.

Keep thinking that.

You people are funny.

You’re falling off a cliff and you still think you’re on top of the mountain.

Comment by Ferd McBerfle | 2008-10-06 09:28:29

And you dullards are on a bus headed off the cliff up ahead on the far left.

Too bad none of us will take the time to throw you a rope. We’ve already tried that with you slimemolds.

Comment by Denise | 2008-10-06 10:50:10

This is a really positive article about how McCain will win Florida and Ohio etc…. A little long but very insightful.

http://hillbuzz.wordpress.com/2008/10/06/a-word-or-two-or-twelve-hundred-on-new-voter-registration/

Comment by Brandon | 2008-10-06 11:09:42

I have to admit that I had never heard of Ayers before I saw mention of him on this site. So, to me, it is possible that Obama didn’t know of Ayer’s past when he first ran for Senate. If you took a poll and asked the majority of Americans if they knew of Bill Ayers past BEFORE this election, what do you suppose their answers would be?

With that being said, this whole Ayers issue for me means nothing. Why? Because Ayers was never convicted of anything. They could not prove in a court of law that he did anything wrong. So, for people to call him a “terrorist”, is off base in my mind, since nothing was ever proven against the guy. If someone had proven that Ayers did something wrong, and he was convicted of such, then my stance would definitely change.

And as for Palin wanting to bring up Wright again? That is casting stones from a glass house in my opinion, considering the video that is going around the internet of her being “blessed” against the evils of witchcraft. Unlike Obama’s former Church, actual evidence does exist that Palin did hear and support the things her Pastor espoused. Granted, I am not saying that what Wright said in Church is right, because it isn’t. In fact, it makes me sick to see a supposed “man of the cloth” talk that way. But, I have seen no credible proof that Obama was there for those services. You could speculate that he was, but that is all it will be. Show me a tape of Obama actually there for a service when Wright preached the crap he has become known for.

I am the type of person who prefers hard evidence, rather than speculation that cannot be proven.

Comment by katmandu | 2008-10-06 11:18:32

Ayers has admitted many of his misdeeds. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F02E1DE1438F932A2575AC0A9679C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=print His wife did time because she protected her friend who participated in an armed robbery.

The couple turned themselves in to authorities in 1980. While some charges relating to their activities with the Weathermen were dropped due to prosecutorial misconduct[21] (see COINTELPRO), Dohrn pled guilty to charges of aggravated battery and bail jumping, receiving probation.[22] She later served less than a year of jail time, after refusing to testify against ex-Weatherman Susan Rosenberg in an armed robbery case.

Comment by Brandon | 2008-10-06 11:37:08

Thanks for the link, but it seems that Ayers says one thing one minute, and then another the next. From what I read, he admitted to bombing the Pentagon, but then clarifies that the Weathermen did. So, you are left with the question of which story of his to believe.

Here is my problem with this connection. Obama is not responsible for what Ayers may or may not have done decades ago. I cannot fault Obama for a friendship with Ayers as long as they are not doing anything wrong today. I know that some people don’t see it the same way as I do, and that is fine. I am just stating my position.

Comment by don tufts | 2008-10-06 12:02:14

brandon how old are you 15 or 16 grow the hell up.i am 55 and i remeber what those scum wanted and that was the overthrow of the united states.THE ONLY REASON AYERS AND DOHRN ARNT ROTTING IN LEVANWORTH IS BECAUSE OF J EDGAR HOOVERS INSANITY OF DOING NON COURT ORDERED WIRETAPS.also ayres has pushed a radicalization of the schools and the teaching of social justice.why dont you find out what ayers means by that before you open your pie hole again.

(Comments wont nest below this level)

Comment by Brandon | 2008-10-06 12:16:39

No, actually I am 39, and up until I saw Ayers name on this site, I had never heard of him. That may be because I don’t live in Illinois, but the fact still remains that I had never heard of him.

Personally I would have to question your age as well, since I don’t see too many people who claim to be your age acting like children throwing around petty insults.

 

Comment by Mr. Natural | 2008-10-06 12:31:40

No, actually I am 39, and up until I saw Ayers name on this site, I had never heard of him. That may be because I don’t live in Illinois, but the fact still remains that I had never heard of him.

Sweetie, not living in Illinois is no excuse. Obama’s radical-chic pals in the Weather Underground detonated bombs nationwide. State borders didn’t stop them. They were equal opportunity wackos.

 

Comment by Morgan | 2008-10-06 12:35:58

I don’t know how you can hypothesize that Obama didn’t know about him– his political career was launched in Ayer’s living room.

Do you ever wonder what guys like Ayers, Wright, Pfleger, Rezko, Pritzker and all the rest see in him? Any concern at all? Guaranteed they know Obama better than you do.

 

Comment by Brandon | 2008-10-06 12:47:46

Ayers never came up in history classes when I was in high school, and in my own reading growing up, I never ran across his name. Thanks for throwing the “sweetie” comment in there. That always makes me laugh.

What Wright and Ayers see in Obama is of no concern to me. If I was to vote for Obama, what would matter is what I see in him. Others people’s opinions do not hold any sway on what I think, or how I vote.

 

Comment by BettsAZ | 2008-10-06 13:42:55

“Ayers never came up in history classes when I was in high school…”

That’s because your teachers were “educated” by professors like Bill Ayers.

 

Comment by One Small Vote for McCain | 2008-10-06 22:23:09

Brandon, Brandon, Brandon, you are a hoot and a fraud. Move to France or Russia…they are already set up as ultra socialist or authoritorian…which ever suits you best. Don’t drag my America into you’re idea of a societal sespool of collectivism. Also, don’t forget to let me know who you work for and I’ll make sure you get a raise and a promotion…not.

 
 
 
 

Comment by kat in your hat | 2008-10-06 11:28:35

“So, to me, it is possible that Obama didn’t know of Ayer’s past when he first ran for Senate.”

WHAT? Bill Ayers and his father were/ are powerful people in political circles. Ayers and Dorhn are legendary in Chicago, and in their circles. There is no way on the planet that Obama did not know who these people were. Michelle knew Bernadine Dorhn at their law office before Barack even met Michelle.

“With that being said, this whole Ayers issue for me means nothing. Why? Because Ayers was never convicted of anything. They could not prove in a court of law that he did anything wrong.”

WRONG. Bill Ayers is “unrepentant” remember? He ADMITS to doing everything and is NOT SORRY about it. AND the reason he was not convicted is because of prosecutorial misconduct…and the FBI botched the case. It WAS NOT because they couldn’t PROVE anything. Even Bill Ayers said he was “Guilty as sin and free as a bird.” He wrote a book about, and has been in documentaries and news interviews discussing everything he did. Where have you been. He talked about how the weather was on the day he bombed The Pentagon.

“And as for Palin wanting to bring up Wright again? That is casting stones from a glass house in my opinion, considering the video that is going around the internet of her being “blessed” against the evils of witchcraft.”

Yes, the guy who did that blessed against witchcraft in Kenya. GUESS WHAT? Barack Obama’s entire paternal FAMILY is in Kenya. You really want to go to KENYA? Raila Odinga? 1200 killed, 300,000 displaced because of his election caos? This man is Obama’s cousin, the one who wants to introduce Sharia Law, the one Obama campaigned for IN KENYA? Want to talk about Obama’s entire Muslim family, or how much Obongo “Roy” Odinga HATES the USA? Or how about Obama’s brother living in squalor? You want to talk aboutt he “strange” witchcraft in Kenya? In Obama’s family village? You need to do your own research.

“But, I have seen no credible proof that Obama was there for those services. You could speculate that he was, but that is all it will be. Show me a tape of Obama actually there for a service when Wright preached the crap he has become known for.”

Obama already admitted to knowing and hearing Pastor Wright saying controversial things in his mega race speech. Were you not listening? 20 years in that church and you think Obama had no clue? What planet are you on? What about Meeks, and Phleger, and Farrakhan? You think Obama didn’t know they all preached black liberation theology as well. The point is not so much what Pastor Wright SAID. The WHOLE ENTIRE CHURCH was a black liberation theology chuch based on James Cone!

Comment by NoBamaNoWay | 2008-10-06 17:04:27

heh heh. smackdown. good job kat.

 
 

Comment by No Way, No How, NoBama | 2008-10-06 11:33:53

The guy not only admitted to his terrorism, he couldn’t say it wouldn’t happen again! Ayers has radical beliefs–in the 60, 70’s, 80’s, 90’s and today. Why is it so many of Obama’s friends want to “change” America? They always have!

As for Wright–Obama heard the beliefs espoused by his preacher in thos 20 years, and they just happen to be similiar to all of his other friends!

Either you are too young and dumb to know what they all have in common or you think just like them.

Comment by Brandon | 2008-10-06 11:52:20

You’re missing my point. Prove to me Obama believes what Wright or Ayers believe. That is what I am asking for.

I am a member of the Catholic Church, and all my life I have heard how being gay is an abomination. Not to mention their stance on abortion. I went every week most of my life (not as often anymore), yet oddly enough, I don’t share those beliefs. Now, how is that possible?

Unless you can prove to me that Obama actually believes what these other people do, then you won’t change my mind. Do you see what I am getting at?

Comment by Buzz Latte | 2008-10-06 11:55:37

“I will stand with the muslims.” - Barack Obama

(Comments wont nest below this level)

Comment by Brandon | 2008-10-06 12:02:36

And what is wrong with Muslims? Or are you of the belief that all Muslims are terrorists? I know a few Muslims, and they are upstanding, decent human beings.

 

Comment by NoBamaNoWay | 2008-10-06 17:14:47

you know some *american muslims?* i suspect. muslims in their own native countries are a whole different bunch of people, and if you think they’re so great, why don’t you move to the muslim country of your choice. don’t let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

 
 

Comment by konrad | 2008-10-06 12:18:38

Brandon… are u kidding me. I went to college in the states and could not stand those people for 10 minutes…. I am black. You had to knwo what was up being in that church. Obama is slim shady and I can’t believe the USA has gotten so desperate adn lost that they are falling for one of these guys. Oh well once you vote for him, he’s all yours….you own him.

(Comments wont nest below this level)

Comment by Brandon | 2008-10-06 12:30:17

What people are you referring to? Blacks, or Muslims?

And I never said I was voting for Obama. In fact, I am leaning more towards the Libertarian Party, since that is where most of my political beliefs lie. For the record, I have never voted by party, but rather person.

I am posting over here, because the topic is fascinating.

 
 

Comment by Morgan | 2008-10-06 12:40:33

Brandon, prove to me that Obama believe ANYTHING. Or tell me something you think he believes, that you support. That’s a ridiculous standard. You use the evidence you have.

A guy that tells me that he specifically and carefully sought out Marxists to associate with, and then hangs out with Marxists in the future, yet you want to go ahead and just believe that it’s just accidental association? You go ahead with that.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 

Comment by bemused | 2008-10-06 13:31:25

Then if you’re such a good Catholic you know that only G-d knows what is the truth in people’s hearts; you are using this to excuse yourself from having to look at Barry Soetoro’s association of years with these people and tacit, if not spoken, approval. Yet normal people would figure this out and leave. The most charitable interpretation I can give for your dogged refusal to “rush to judgement” is that (a) Soetoro is a total imbecile to not realize what is going on around him, or else he does agree and is smart enough to know that admitting it would kill him politically; (b) you are a total imbecile not to see that people do associate with those they agree with, or you are a clever troll making a sophistic argument. Tell it to Aquinas.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 

Comment by BettsAZ | 2008-10-06 13:56:49

When you sit in a church for 20 YEARS that spews hatred of America, whites, and Jews, and you say that the preacher is your “spiritual mentor”….

What is it with people that cannot connect the dots with the magnitude of unscrupulous characters with connections to terrorists/convicted Chicago crooks/Racists:Rev.Wright,Louis Farrakhan,Black Panthers,ETC.???

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 

Comment by Johnny at Work | 2008-10-06 11:54:20

SDS and the Weather Underground had their foudation in Columbia University. It is impossible to go to Columbia and not know who Bill Ayers and the Weather Underground were. This is espececially so for someone who has Community Organizer and Political aspirations.

Columbia University has several web pages on SDS and the Weather Underground. It is woven into the fabric and history of the school.

Just like at Notre Dame, everyone knows who Knute Rockney, the Gipper, and Rudy were, when you attend Columbia, you know who Bill Ayers and the Weather Underground were.

 

Comment by chris | 2008-10-06 12:18:24

There’s some repors he knew of Ayers via his mentor Davis in Hawaii before he left for college. And I’d take bets his mommy talked about Ayers too. Ayers was her kind of people. There has also been mention of his knowing Ayers at Columbia. No way can anyone think he didn’t know aabout Ayers and his background.

 

Comment by chris | 2008-10-06 12:18:24

There’s some repors he knew of Ayers via his mentor Davis in Hawaii before he left for college. And I’d take bets his mommy talked about Ayers too. Ayers was her kind of people. There has also been mention of his knowing Ayers at Columbia. No way can anyone think he didn’t know aabout Ayers and his background.

 

Comment by Lisa | 2008-10-06 12:52:28

Why is it relevant whether or not Obama was in the Church during Wright’s sermons? The reason Obama should have spoken out was because Wright’s comments were to quote BO, “inflammatory and appalling,” not because they came to light in the middle of a campaign. Harldy a profile in courage. And sorry to disillusion you but Bill Ayers, while not convicted (due to a tecnicality, if I’m not mistaken), took full responsiblity for the bombings and said he wished he could have done more. Is that evidence hard enough for you Brandon?

 

Comment by Postmaster | 2008-10-06 15:17:51

I knew of William Ayers and I lived in Wyoming. Where did Obama live? Well, huh? How could anyone living in Chicago NOT know of William Ayers?

 
 

Comment by kat in your hat | 2008-10-06 11:09:58

Kelvin…

Please, please, let’s just talk about the economy. You know the big scary economy problem the liberal democrats helped cause, and the liberal media keeps concentrating on.

Please, whatever you do, don’t talk about something the Obama camp wants you to NOT talk about.

Please, continue to be distracted with the economy…please…it helps Obama. Don’t inform the voters…they don’t need to know who Obama is.

 
 
 

Comment by Kelvin Hearts PUMAs | 2008-10-06 13:23:54

Delusion is the opiate of these PUMA masses.

Comment by Mr. Natural | 2008-10-06 15:42:34

Servility is the opiate of Obama’s lemming hordes.

 
 
 

Comment by Brandon | 2008-10-06 11:20:25

Hannity’s program did not change people’s votes. It reinforced the beliefs of those who were already going to vote for McCain.

It’s a little late for the supposed gloves to be coming off now, considering early voting has already begun.

These types of attacks against Obama have been public for about a year, and with the exception of the Wright issue, they did not make much of a dent, so what makes you think they will make a difference now, when nothing in the stories have changed?

How dare Obama live down the street from Ayers and the others. What is this world coming to? You know what? I live down the street from a few paroled murderers and child molesters. Guess that makes me one of them, huh?

I also find it a bit odd that you go by the name of “Soldier of Christ” on here while calling people “bi-sexual pigs”. How very Christ like of you.

Comment by lark | 2008-10-06 11:42:12

Her name soldier of Christ has nothing to do with Christ. That in itself shows how shallow you are and how easily it is for you to believe the Obama rhetoric when it doesn’t have anything to do with reality and all to do with building imaginary goals.

Comment by Brandon | 2008-10-06 11:56:08

That what exactly does that name mean? Is there another meaning to the name of Christ that I missed?

 
 

Comment by Maverick | 2008-10-06 11:44:24

Here’s a video about wright that’s being shown in Penn and MI etc.
It’s put out by countryPAC for McCain.
He has all types of Pacs working hard for him.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6E0ycYEGtqU

 

Comment by Irwin | 2008-10-06 14:09:28

Brandon, No one is trying to be Christ like except Obama and he is not Christ. Guilt tripping people won’t work here.
What a person has done in their life, who they hang out with does say who they are. Things are connected in life.Open you eyes. Obama could have spent with people who collect stamps or are meditators or construction workers or horticulturists. Who did he choose to associate with ? Radical Activists. That says a whole lot to people who understand humannature.

 
 
 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-10-06 09:36:26

Hmmm….Kelvin Why is DNC general counsel and TERRORIST LAWYER defending Barky in Berg v. Obama lawsuit? Thanks for the article Larry…Barky sure has interesting friends…and so does the DNC. check out Uppity’s latest

Comment by justme | 2008-10-06 10:28:02

Lets make it easier for u Kelvin & Robert just take a long walk off a short pier.

You should be ashamed of yourself supporting someone who associates with such people.

If that is your theme, move somewhere else and leave the rest of us with the Maverick and The Barracuda to lead the way.

Our service men & women did not fight to keep us all safe for the country to be handed over to radicals…..
How many days have you served your country?

Thank you to all our millitary….

Comment by Kelvin Hearts PUMAs | 2008-10-06 13:25:48

I’m afraid that you’ll beat us to it.

 

Comment by Kelvin Hearts PUMAs | 2008-10-06 13:39:10

These people are friends of McCain: G. Gordon Liddy, David Duke, Charles Keating and John Singlaub. I’ll match the dirt on these guys against Wright, Rezko and Ayers any day of the week.

Comment by Ferd McBerfle | 2008-10-06 13:48:42

You’re still the same young snip, always whining about the other candidate. That’s the common practice fallacy, pinhead, and is patently illogical. Own your candidate, crap artist.

Comment by Kelvin Hearts PUMAs | 2008-10-06 14:11:18

Be objective and look them up. McCain and Palin have dirt on them as well. But I guess since only Obama defeated Hillary, he’s public enemy #1, huh?

Comment by Donna Brazile | 2008-10-06 14:13:33

Don’t worry teenie weenie, I’m sure Barky still has a place in his heart for the small things you have to offer.

Stop the hate!

 

Comment by Ferd McBerfle | 2008-10-06 14:17:27

I am objective, little turd. Oblockhead is unfit, unqualified, and a danger to the Republic. We need nothing else to justify a vote for McCain.

It says a lot about you that you support a candidate with ties to homegrown terrorists.

So, green one, put that jimson weeed in your pipe and smoke it in lieu of chugging any more Kool-Aide.

 
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by kgirl1028 | 2008-10-06 10:38:55

ok Kevin let’s talk economy First America’s economy get’s hijacked by fannie mae and Freddie and whose pocket is it sitting in? why obama’s. hmmmm wonder how it got there. And why did the democrats want obama’s pals of acorn to get 20% of the bail out money, and why are embers of freddie mac and fannie mae on obama’s advisory board, i mean didn’t they rob us blind enough once. let’s talk economy. Screw bush, turns out the dems have been robbing our asses blind as well.

Comment by kgirl1028 | 2008-10-06 10:40:11

Like sarah said never again, never again.

 
 

Comment by Perry Logan | 2008-10-06 10:55:15

I think Kelvin has a point. What a wonderful world, when we can learn from our trolls!

PUMAs and anti-Obamites all over the web are working this Ayers thing to death, but I’m convinced that the Ayers connections simply don’t matter to voters, except for those on the political right, who would never vote for Obama anyway.

This is a strategic point I’m making. I’ll bet that Ayers doesn’t make moderate or liberal voters see red, as he obviously makes right-wingers see red. Not everyone in America thinks protesting an illegal war was so bad, or that Obama’s connections with him mean doodley-squat. That’s just the reality.

This problem is occurring a lot at NQ these days. We are not consistently attacking Obama in areas that will convert voters. Much of what we’re doing will mainly convince people who are already convinced, and go right by the people we need to convince.

Comment by Perry Logan | 2008-10-06 10:56:49

Here’s my approach–showing people that Obama is really a neocon: :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvNkRJ1x-6g

Comment by Zee | 2008-10-06 11:31:58

While I agree Ayers is not going to matter to many, there is no way I’m opening yet another Perry preening in front of the camera forever video.

Rezko ought to be enough make everyone see red. Slumlord who took the public money Obama gave him and let people freeze in condemned buildings while he and Auchi, Hussein’s bagman, conspired with Michelle Obama to carve up a historic property so the Obamas could cut a deal to afford it.

 

Comment by beebop | 2008-10-06 11:36:28

We know you’re approach …. they have been posted here ad naseum …. I have used up my rolaids for a life time ….

 
 

Comment by No Way, No How, NoBama | 2008-10-06 11:38:40

Protesting a war by making bombs filled with nails with the intention of killing an maiming people? Where Bernadine Dohrn said that “dig it” in reference to the manson murders and that the killers ate in the presence of their dead bodies and shoved a fork in them? Those little protestors?

 

Comment by Ivory Bill Woodpecker | 2008-10-06 11:39:52

Dammit, Logan, Ayers and his ilk did not protest an illegal war by legal, peaceful means. They committed terrorist acts. What part of “terrorist” do you not understand?

 

Comment by lark | 2008-10-06 11:47:41

Ayers connections simply don’t matter to voters

It has to do. Because he also said of his willingness to meet with Chavez without preconditions. So when he meets with foes, including Putin, what comes out of his meetings will be the things that he picks up from them that he will start promoting here. Yes or no?

 
 

Comment by joseyJ | 2008-10-06 11:09:06

Obama doesn’t discuss the “economy.” He just promises lots of candy and no school on Fridays and the media leads the dumbed down electorate to believe him!

Obama truly is an affirmative action candidate - given a pass by the media from the gito.

 

Comment by Ginger | 2008-10-06 11:30:07

Go to CSPAN and watch the commitee meeting now on…..it’s awesome. The repubs are pissed and heads will roll………this is great stuff and fingers are being pointed.

 

Comment by cynic | 2008-10-06 12:32:50

What amazes me is that they’re not losing by a landslide, although it’s always possible the ground is shifting far more than the polls currently suggest.

BTW, the Founding Fathers were the revolutionary thinkers of their day, in case anyone has forgotten. If “revolution” is defined as challenging the status quo and the tyrany of wealth and privilage to get back to economic common sense, equality of opportunity, and the rule of Constitutional law, count me in. Our votes are our Constitutionally authorized weapons.

 

Comment by stodghie | 2008-10-06 14:18:47

kevin welcome to the big leagues. clearly you and barky aren’t ready. go to the corner and whine!

 
 
 

Comment by Arabella Trefoil | 2008-10-06 09:12:46

Acorn’s activities contributed to the current economic meltdown.

Domestic terrorist Ayers and his radical pals support Obama in every way, including financially. Hannity’s report showed the American public who Obama’s backers are. These people are thugs who want to destroy America.

No wonder Obama and his bots are running around like fleas on a hot skillet.

Comment by Maverick | 2008-10-06 11:35:29

The markets have come to the sobering realization that Nancy Pelosi’s $700 $850 billion rescue plan won’t work quickly to unfreeze the credit markets, and that many banks are still having difficulty gaining access to cash.

Where’s the money? Gone to ACORN and SOROS?

The high-risk subprime mortgage social engineering community service experiment by left-wing ACORN and Obama has created the largest financial crisis since The Great Depression. The full reach of the corruption and scandal may never be known but those who created it must not be rewarded. The architects, primarily left-wing Democrats, created laws, took donations, looked the other way and instead were too busy overseeing donations to their own presidential campaigns and robbing main street blind. Now these same left-wing Democrats blame everyone else and get up on their high horses and say, “we are here to save you” from the crises they created.

 

Comment by beebop | 2008-10-06 11:39:55

They wouldn’t be here freaking out if they weren’t concerned that with less than 30 days to the election and after keeping the truth out of the press for more than three years, they aren’t willing to do WHATEVER. IT. TAKES to keep the lies in play. PUMA now equals NOBAMA ….

 
 

Comment by scorbs | 2008-10-06 09:15:23

Why don’t the repubs point out that Obama could create MORE wars, not fewer? His supporters believe he’ll get us out of Iraq (which is highly doubtful), but also 1) Obama has threatened to bomb Pakistan, 2) doesn’t think Iran is a threat and 3) has promised aid to Kenya and other African nations where we could get involved in wars. He already caused a civil war over there by getting involved in local politics.

Why don’t you point out more his World Poverty Act, where he’d give billions of taxpayer dollars to impoverished nations. I don’t think half voters even know what Obama’s plans are. Instead of promising to balance OUR budget, he wants to give away billions to impoverished nations.

Comment by Soldier of Christ | 2008-10-06 09:41:37

scorbs

They have pointed these things…but the american people only listen when “there are scandals”. This country listen to smears instead of substances and with Obama we have to hit him with the kitchen sink so the american people can see he bleeds and he is not the Almighty.

 
 

Comment by jwrjr | 2008-10-06 09:15:53

Call Orkin! There is an infestation of trolls here. These are the particularly disgusting kind that believe their own propaganda.

Comment by jd4hill | 2008-10-06 09:17:30

Be happy. Whenever you see a lot of them trying to take over the thread — it means they are terrified.

 

Comment by Maverick | 2008-10-06 11:38:58

The trolls are paid to say what they say. Then they’ll vote for Mac on Nov 4, when their troll job ends.

 
 

Comment by Shiloh | 2008-10-06 09:17:05

This is all playing out by design. Why do you think republicans wanted Obama to be nominated so badly? They knew the kind of crap he was hiding and they knew that come October they could disclose it. Obama never had a prayer.

Comment by Arabella Trefoil | 2008-10-06 09:23:58

Comment by Pennsylvania goes RED! | 2008-10-06 09:40:36

The n0bama camp is trotting out the dusty Keating 5 playbook. That is ancient history, McCain was exonerated, his constituents in Arizona keep electing him to the Senate, and oh BTW McCain is also co-sponsor of landmark campaign finance reform. The only thing the n0bama campaign is doing with this Keating 5 rehash is:

1)opening the door for scrutiny of n0bama’s past

and 2) proving that n0bama’s only contribution to the political landscape is sliming his opponents.

Besides that he doesn’t have a whole lot to offer.

Anyway, does he think McCain’s campaign wasn’t expecting Keating 5 to resurface? McCain will be able to respond to that questioning. How’s n0bama going to reply to the Ayers questions?

Comment by Arabella Trefoil | 2008-10-06 09:42:53

Comment by jwrjr | 2008-10-06 09:50:01

He will scream “swiftboating!” and pound his fists and feet like the spoiled child that he is. It is not “swiftboating” when it is TRUE. But that won’t stop the brain-dead trolls from spreading the toxic waste.

Comment by Pennsylvania goes RED! | 2008-10-06 10:39:37

He will yell swiftboating and fall back on the “r” word offense, and yes the brain dead trolls will eat it up.

But the undecideds want answers. Deflecting attention by screaming “swiftboating!” won’t work.

Did Kerry ever come up with a substantive response to the swiftboaters?

 
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by blog force one | 2008-10-06 09:18:42

Larry you should scour the NYC leftist newspapers for photos and articles from the time of Obamas attendance at Columbia U. I am sure you will find something incriminating there! Also the Yippie paper run by Dana Beal may have something as well . Also to be investigated is his Autobiographies and who helped him write them ..

Comment by No Way, No How, NoBama | 2008-10-06 11:46:11

I could have sworn I saw Obama sitting next to Ayers on Hannity’s show last night…am I the only one who thought there was a striking resemblance if that wasn’t him? The photos seemed to have been from the 80’s.

 

Comment by chris | 2008-10-06 12:33:49

Probably all been scrubbed like everything else in his past. Where are his friends, his school records, his thesis, his medical records, his Harvard admissions/records, his bc, etc. etc. etc. If America doesn’t wake up and realize what makes this man tick and who controls him, then we really will be in free fall to a third world socialist country. Talk economy and policy all you want, but there are issues here of legality, character and who is really controlling this election that are far more important in the long run. Frankly, i think the financial mess was meant as the distracion from the facts coming out about Obama. A planned financial mess that he will supposedly solve therby absolving him from his past. Don’t be fooled America. He is the evil you want to eliminate. No Obama for POTUS if you value our country.

 
 

Comment by The Robot | 2008-10-06 09:19:10

Kicking off a Senate campaign in the living room of persons who brought harm to fellow Americans in the form of domestic terrorism - who wish they had done more? This is good judgment?

Obama is clearly unfit to lead at any time.

No wonder the O’s are freaking out. Their false messiah is becoming exposed.

Comment by Galt, Master Thrall of Planet Triskelion, Proprietor of the NQ Popcorn Concession | 2008-10-06 10:53:23

No wonder the O’s are freaking out. Their false messiah is becoming exposed.

Obama’s fig leaf removed and behold the eunuch.

 
 

Comment by jd4hill | 2008-10-06 09:20:34

It is also amazing that he hopey/changey people want to pretend they are actually interesting in the economy and our welfare as a nation.

They follow a leader who is clueless on these issues and has offered absolutely no leadership on either.

If they really cared about any of this, they would have supported Hillary in the first place, not this fraud.

 

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2008-10-06 09:21:18

Brokaw calls Ayers a “member” of the Weatherman…neglecting to add he was the leader of it?

Does anyone recall who Bill Ayers endorsed the Anarchist’s Cookbook?

Comment by jwrjr | 2008-10-06 12:38:58

Sort of like calling Hitler a ‘member’ of the National Socialist Party.

 
 

Comment by bloodymary | 2008-10-06 09:22:23

By the way it is no longer the Democratic Party. It is now known as The Campaign for Change. Remember this The Campaign for Change formerly The Democratic Party. Not a bad post [DELETED BY ADMIN]

Sincerely yours,
BloodyMary

 

Comment by jd4hill | 2008-10-06 09:22:30

Even Bill Clinton was on the news several times making clear that the Republicans wanted more regulation and the Dems wouldn’t hear of it.

Interesting.

Comment by Maverick | 2008-10-06 12:10:59

The infighting remains. The parties are so polarized. Dems have gone off the deep end.
I can’t remember the party being this radical.
Republican strategist says Obama and the Dems want us to lose the war in Iraq. SEE VIDEO.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0zIhCaQRWU