RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Late Night Open Thread * NOW’s Time is Now


Is that a cornball title or what.

What’s goin’ on? (I drop my g’s too sometimes.)

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post260 Comments »

Comment by HARP | 2008-10-06 23:35:41

Cuda is winning them over one by one.

 

Comment by Alan | 2008-10-06 23:39:24

I found a William Ayers reference to Obama via Google’s Book preview page.

Check out page 82 in Bill Ayer’s “A kind and just parent” book.

http://books.google.com/books?id=-fjb7_3Qjy4C&printsec=frontcover&dq=A+Kind+and+Just+Parent&sig=ACfU3U3Rulv3RU-AFLDui8ZU-XW81GyK6A#PPA81,M1

Comment by Vicki | 2008-10-07 00:21:50

Did anyone see CNN’s Anderson Cooper tonight? Over on FreeRepublic (I know, I know) there’s a thread saying he did an expose about 0bama and Ayers that proved that 0 lied nonstop about his relationship.

Just wondered. If/when I find a video link I’ll post it.

Comment by joe | 2008-10-07 00:51:51

Check out the SNL sub-prime clip that was mysteriously dropped down the memory hole by NBC. The billionaire couple is a real couple that helped to collapse Wachovia Bank. And good old George Soros makes an appearance. Some are speculating that NBC was threatened with a lawsuit and they deleted any reference to it on the website. But someone saved it from the Internet shredder.

http://patdollard.com/2008/10/it-is-here-the-banned-snl-skit-cannot-hide-from-louie/

Comment by Vicki | 2008-10-07 01:42:21

He had to take it down due to “copyright” concerns, yeah right.

 
 
 

Comment by Susan1968 | 2008-10-07 00:24:55

I sent your Amazon book link to Sean Hannity & other journalists.

I especially liked the way Ayers mentioned Farrahkan and Obama are his neighbors and that “The Fruit of Islam” (Fraahkan’s army) provides security for the entire neighborhood.

Must be why Obama wanted to buy a house there.

 

Comment by jrterrier | 2008-10-07 06:36:26

I thought I read somewhere that Obama gave a blurb with a positive review of Ayers’ book — something that would show one more link between the two.

 
 

Comment by elise | 2008-10-06 23:40:14

It feels so good to see someone (anyone) from NOW coming out in support of Sarah Palin. That org. has been completely worthless in this election and, in fact, I have recieved some emails from them adding to the attacks based on her lack of experience. They ignored the pathetic record of Obama and he is running for president.

Comment by Snickers | 2008-10-07 00:38:26

I am a former state president of the National Organization for Women. I am still a state officer and on the executive board in my state. I was appalled that the National NOW PAC chose to endorse Obama/Biden instead of sitting this one out. I have contacted Mandell and told her I support her. I am voting McCain/Palin. This election has been a disgrace and has revealed that misogyny and sexism is still acceptable behavior in this country. NOW could have taken a leadership role and made a statement about this, instead the NOW PAC chose to implicitly and tacitly endorse this behavior by endorsing Obama/Biden. I will not renew my NOW membership.

 

Comment by Ai1een | 2008-10-07 02:05:22

I wrote N.O.W. several times during the primaries about their lack of action when Hillary was being attacked. Their LACK OF ACTION for the first viable woman candidate in our history was REPREHESIBLE and UNEXCUSABLE.

When N.O.W. began using membership money to send out their attack ads on SARAH PALIN I wrote them a blistering letter of condemnation and basically told them they would never get one more cent out of me for as long as I lived - and I MEAN it (nor will NARAL).

As I told them: In my opinion, a TRUE FEMINIST IS ONE WHO RESPECTS, HONORS AND UPHOLDS ALL WOMEN - EVEN THOSE WHO CARRY A DIFFERENT BELIEF SYSTEM FROM ONE’S OWN.

It is a sad day (or year) in hell to see that the NATIONAL ORGANIZATIoN FOR WOMEN has failed so miserably in this fundamental premise of feminism. It is a even bigger testament to Ms. Mandell that she was able to “overcome” the vicious mindset of N.O.W. to think for herself and stand firm to her personal beliefs. I’m incredibly proud of her - it’s not easy to do; no matter how old we get, there’s always peer pressure - our professional organizations are just another form of high school.

 
 

Comment by scorbs | 2008-10-06 23:42:49

I’m personally pleased that some officials in NOW get it.

 

Comment by scorbs | 2008-10-06 23:45:20

Don’t forget what naral did to Hillary which was inexplicable when O’s and her records are compared.

 

Comment by beverly leslie | 2008-10-06 23:55:39

Thank you Shelly Mandell from Now.

There’s a special place in hell for women who don’t support other women: Ms. Albright’s response was a tad ridiculous.

Comment by Brendy | 2008-10-07 00:04:04

Ms. Albright’s response was a tad ridiculous.

**

I agree; how utterly childish. So what if Albright doesn’t support Palin’s “PARTY”, should should have appreciated her comments (kinship between women) and kept it at that or SAID NOTHING AT ALL. Big jerk! (I was gonna - I mean ‘going’ to add some unflattering (sp?) adjectives but I decided not to - since I’m a nice, decent person ;)

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-10-07 00:38:44

Oh she only did that cause of Henry Kissinger correcting Biden…Aaaaand it is childish…Maddy I thought you were bigger than that…sheeesh!

 

Comment by FranSC | 2008-10-07 01:01:31

I have quoted Madeline Allbright many times with that statement that I have loved. I was startled as well to hear her retort to Sarah Palin’s reference to the statement. This is especially curious when Madeline Allbright wrote about her close friendship with Senator Jesse Helms who was quite chivalrous toward Ms. Allbright.

 
 

Comment by Ai1een | 2008-10-07 02:09:09

beverly leslie -
That is the absolute PERFECT reply to Ms. Albright’s “response”! You hit the nail on the head! THAT HAS TO BE SENT IN TO GRETA -

Comment by Eden | 2008-10-07 04:07:30

 
 
 

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-10-06 23:56:44

I think Shelly Mandell is amazing and courageous. She is one of my new heros.

 

Comment by fif | 2008-10-06 23:57:27

Thanks for posting this Susan. I asked in the Ani thread if anyone has contact information for this woman, because she must be getting slammed by critics. If someone can post it, we can send our support for being courageous enough to recognize Palin’s strength as a woman, despite ideology.

Comment by beverly leslie | 2008-10-07 00:39:22

If you google her name and los angeles info. will come up.

 

Comment by Snickers | 2008-10-07 00:49:47

fif,
Go to the California NOW page, on the left side are California NOW Chapters, click the button and scroll down to the LA chapter and you’ll see Shelly Mandell’s name.

 

Comment by FranSC | 2008-10-07 01:12:23

Exactly. Feminism is NOT just about liberal women who are democrats. The women’s movement was a bipartisan effort. It is NOT just synonymous with Roe v Wade. The women who have slammed Sarah Palin are NOT feminists. Feminists are about enriching the lives of all women - not some selected women.

Palin is furthering the cause of women by virtue of how far she has come. I am happy to have the opportunity to support a conservative woman. Even if Hillary were in the campaign now, I would NOT be slamming Palin. Like Bill Clinton, I would be saying, “She is a formidable candidate, but I just don’t agree with some of her views.”

 
 

Comment by candy | 2008-10-06 23:59:34

All the news is just so depressing I have to vent here. How is it that the polls reflect support for the neophyte foes up as the economy worsen? What is the correlation here? It’s such an absurd conclusion for people to make–economy goes down so votes should go to Nobama. Nobama is no solution to the economic problems.

Still, it is just so depressing to see that McCain might not win, not because of his lack of qualifications or Nobama’s merits, but because of some outside factor for which neither man can control.

Comment by Brendy | 2008-10-07 00:11:01

candy - since the current president is a republican, any and all major problems (like this mortgage/stock market thing happening) will always be blamed on THAT party. Since McCain is a republican - they’ll pin this mess on him EVEN IF HE’S ENTIRELY DIFFERENT in his approaches or ideas or even if he constantly voted AGAINST Bush on each and every issue - he’d still get blamed. It’s not right - I know. McCain IS NOT BUSH - but the easily led think so. And, of course they can’t think on their own. And to think that Obummer attracted ‘highly educated’ voters???

 

Comment by AnninCA | 2008-10-07 00:12:20

CBS has Mac within 3 points, which is a 9 point drop for Obama in a week.

McCain is definitely not out of it.

Comment by Seattle Moss | 2008-10-07 00:19:16

What we saw with McCain’s speech today was what we can expect tomorrow night.

McCain has been retooled!

I have been talking to several people who had been for Obama that are now supporting McCain.

They are fearful!!

By election day Obama and his minions will be Chavez

Comment by AnninCA | 2008-10-07 00:30:56

If Mac can put forth a clear and direct recovery plan that makes sense and is NOT in senator talk……he’ll win.

Obama has yet to really talk about this crisis and how to handle it.

Comment by Seattle Moss | 2008-10-07 00:37:45

The narrative has been written!
Obama and the democrats have lost Americans a trillion dollars. Obama was missing in action. McCain sought legislation to stop the subprime debacle and suspended his campaign when it came time to pass a bill. Obama showed no leadership by not getting democrats to pass the bill the first time out.

The solution is not to raise taxes as Obama wants..

History shows that raising taxes in this environment causes
“The Great Deflation”
which is far worse than a depression.

 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-10-07 00:51:27

I’ve been reading on blogs that Barky won’t be able to keep ANY of his problems with the economy…and that McCain can keep most of his because the key to his plan is to cut waste and build indusry at home…Feds are goin on a diet under Macdaddy!

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-10-07 00:52:19

meant to say promises…scuse

 

Comment by AnninCA | 2008-10-07 01:13:17

Well, he’s been given 2 chances to revise the plan, and he hasn’t changed a thing.

I about flipped out when he said, “pre-school education is very important and not off the table.”

boy, that said it all.

Comment by dpvegas | 2008-10-07 06:24:51

Pre-school education? And what if both parents are out of a job? Seems to me that the bare necessities would be the top priority.

 
 
 
 

Comment by Brendy | 2008-10-07 01:30:47

McCain seemed to have ‘mojo’ in that New Mexico speech. He didn’t stutter, “ah” or “uh” around (like you-know-who, even tho’ ‘you know who’ IS getting better (thanks to Hillary); he stated what he wanted to say in clear understandable sentences and he got directly to the point AND HE WAS FIESTY and HIGH SPIRITED - that’s the part I loved! He seemed like he was determined and that he is SERIOUS about keeping America AMERICA and looking out for all of us.

 
 

Comment by Newly Independent | 2008-10-07 00:41:16

I’m cool as a cucumber. I know that John McCain will become POTUS in a few weeks.

Maybe it’s because as a former Democrat, I remember being thoroughly convinced that John Kerry would win four years ago. He was ahead of GWB in virtually every MSM-generated poll for months. Democrat voters were worried to death about the Iraq war & the economy. GWB had stolen the 2000 election - and there was still alot of bitterness about that. I didn’t think that any American in their right mind would still be interested in a Republican being President at that point.

The rest is history.

And history is about to repeat itself on November 4th.

Comment by AnninCA | 2008-10-07 01:14:57

Different time, in my opinion. I will always believe that people lied to exit pollsters. They voted for Bush, and they were Dem, and it was because of the war. People loathe to change horses in midstream in a war. They feel “unpatriotic.”

No such benefit to Mac this time.

Comment by AF catfish | 2008-10-07 01:33:33

Just in the last day I’ve noticed a turnaround in the press since Palin started hammering the Bill Ayers issue. Apparently CNN’s Anderson Cooper nailed Obama for lying about how well he knew Ayers, Time’s Mark Halperin is pointing out Obama’s Ayers lies.

I credit Palin - she highlighted Obama’s relationship with Ayers, and then when the AP called her racist for doing so, she said the AP is wrong and kept hammering. This woman will not be cowed. Also, she’s helped by Barky who wore out his race cards a few weeks ago, even SNL nailed his race-card routine.

Comment by Bellevue_NW_Voter The Renter | 2008-10-07 05:06:44

In recent times, I don’t know that there has been a better effort at the “attack dog” portion of the VP nominee’s job, than Sarah is putting forth in this election. She first established herself as a likable girl-next-door sort, and now she’s making jabs laced with humor.

I’ve seen the same tactics work time and time again when used by women in the board room. Keep the faith, folks.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by noproblama | 2008-10-07 03:25:59

Unfortunately, America usually gets the kind of leaders it deserves.

Damn but I’m tired of paying for stupidity of others.

 
 

Comment by kat in your hat | 2008-10-07 00:01:43

YO. Google is doing some gimmick where you can look back at their old indexes for an anniversary?

This is 2001:
http://www.google.com/search2001.html

Can we find anything that maybe wasn’t scrubbed, it’s supposed to be original google searches.

Comment by kat in your hat | 2008-10-07 00:12:03

YO!!!

Use the link above. Type Obama Ayers, etc etc.

It’s a blast from the past, a clean look at 2001 google before things were added or scrubbed!

Here’s that juvenile reform Obama and Ayers worked on:

From 2001 google:

http://www-news.uchicago.edu/releases/97/971104.juvenile.justice.shtml

Should a child ever be called a “super predator?”
A panel at the University of Chicago debates the merits of the juvenile justice system
Children who kill are called “super predators,” “people with no conscience,” “feral pre-social beings”–and “adults.”

William Ayers, author of A Kind and Just Parent: The Children of Juvenile Court(Beacon Press, 1997), says “We should call a child a child. A 13-year-old who picks up a gun isn’t suddenly an adult. We have to ask other questions: How did he get the gun? Where did it come from?”

Ayers, who spent a year observing the Cook County Temporary Juvenile Detention Center in Chicago, is one of four panelists who will speak on juvenile justice at 6 p.m. Thursday, Nov. 20, in the C-Shop of the Reynolds Club, 5706 S. University Ave.

The panel, which marks the 100th anniversary of the juvenile justice system in the United States, is part of the Community Service Center’s monthly discussion series on issues affecting the city of Chicago.

The event is free and open to the public.

Ayers will be joined by Illinois State Sen. Barack Obama, Senior Lecturer in the University of Chicago Law School, who is working to block proposed legislation that would throw more juvenile offenders into the adult system; Randolph Stone, Director of the Mandel Legal Aid Clinic at the University of Chicago; Alex Correa, a reformed juvenile offender who spent 7 years in Cook County Temporary Detention Center; Frank Tobin, a former priest and teacher in the Detention Center who helped Correa; and Willy Baldwin, who grew up in public housing and is currently a teacher in the Detention Center.

The juvenile justice system was founded by Chicago reformer Jane Addams, who advocated the establishment of a separate court system for children which would act like a “kind and just parent” for children in crisis.

One hundred years later, the system is “overcrowded, under-funded, over-centralized and racist,” Ayers said.

Michelle Obama, Associate Dean of Student Services and Director of the University of Chicago Community Service Center, hopes bringing issues like this to campus will open a dialogue between members of the University community and the broader community.

“We know that issues like juvenile justice impact each of us who live in the city of Chicago. This panel gives community members and students a chance to hear about the juvenile justice system not only on a theoretical level, but from the people who have experienced it.”

Comment by kat in your hat | 2008-10-07 00:13:57

Comment by kat in your hat | 2008-10-07 00:22:08

NO QUARTER!!!!

Get to 2001 Google! Do searches, I am finding crap I have never seen before.

Comment by kat in your hat | 2008-10-07 00:39:19

2001 Honorary Celebration Committee
Harvard Alumni:

Barack Obama, Franklin Raines, et al….
http://web.archive.org/web/20011218011828/www.law.harvard.edu/alumni/celebration/committee.shtml

Comment by kat in your hat | 2008-10-07 01:24:13

Comment by kat in your hat | 2008-10-07 01:35:45

2001 google

“THE CYNICAL COVENANT
OF FARRAKHAN AND QADDAFI”

(scuse the uppercase)

http://web.archive.org/web/20010503085434/www.jewishpost.com/jewishpost/jp0202/jpn202c.htm

Comment by kat in your hat | 2008-10-07 01:47:00

2001 google

Want to know Farrakhan’s dream, and how much money Gaddafi planned to give to Farrakhan to make it come true??

http://web.archive.org/web/20001211024200/www.sn.apc.org/wmail/issues/960202/wm960202-19.html

 
 
 

Comment by AF catfish | 2008-10-07 01:47:34

Hey that’s a good one Harvard’s 2001 bio of Obama:

Senator Obama serves on the boards of several organizations including the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, where he is chairman, the Joyce Foundation, the Woods Fund of Chicago, the Center for Neighborhood Technology, the Chicago Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under the Law, and Public Allies.

 

Comment by jbjd | 2008-10-07 02:04:28

This is dynamite. BO meets (?) Mr. Raines, CEO of Fannie Mae, at a gathering of black HLS alumnae in 2000 and, 4 years later, Mr. Raines takes ‘early retirement’ from Fannie Mae, which at the time was already under investigation for questionable accounting irregularities. Then, in 2008, WaPo indicates Raines is advising the BO campaign, a charge Raines subsequently denies. However, no one ever mentioned these 2 had previously met and, as a result, never questioned the extent of their relationship. Kudos to you for this work. Get this to everyone before the debate.

 
 

Comment by Brendy | 2008-10-07 01:34:30

kat in your hat - PLEASE email any and ALL stuff you come across to FOX NEWS (esp. Hannity); Brit Hume is good, too. And, LOU DOBBS on CNN.

(I love ‘Cat in the Hat’ Dr. Seuss; is that where you get your ‘name’ from?…Thing One and Thing Two…)

 

Comment by witness08 | 2008-10-07 07:55:25

And you may never see it again
MAKE A SCREEN SHOT OR PRINT OUT !!!

Comment by Cat in NJ | 2008-10-07 12:44:38

Or save the document as an Adobe PDF … on my Mac, I go to “file”, then “print”, then “save as PDF”. Most likely same for PC .

 
 
 
 

Comment by socalannie | 2008-10-07 00:52:23

Ayers isn’t just radical…he’s truly creepy. Thanks for sharing.

 
 

Comment by Bellevue_NW_Voter The Renter | 2008-10-07 05:12:02

This is funny in light of Obama’s decision to forego government financing:

“Working with Senator Paul Simon in 1998, Senator Obama was one of only four legislators who crafted and passed Illinois’ toughest-ever campaign finance reform law.”

http://web.archive.org/web/20011222150605/www.senatedem.state.il.us/obama/

 

Comment by Bellevue_NW_Voter The Renter | 2008-10-07 05:40:23

More curiosity. Wasn’t Obama listed as becoming a member of the Joyce Foundation board in 1998? There’s an article apparently from 7/96 listing him as a member of the board and containing various trivia about its activities around that time. Not available on google 2008.

 

Comment by Bellevue_NW_Voter The Renter | 2008-10-07 07:00:53

$$$ connection between the Chicago machine, TUCC … and real estate (”the church today is probably one of the largest developers in the city”?):

http://web.archive.org/web/20011014185221/www.chicagoreporter.com/2000/9-2000/church/church1.htm

Close ties to City Hall are not unusual for some of the city’s most influential African American clergy, especially in recent years, The Chicago Reporter found. During Daley’s 11-year tenure, 14 of Chicago’s largest black congregations and their nonprofit affiliates have received $9.8 million in city payments, records show.

The funds help run day care programs, build affordable housing and administer social service programs. Four of the churches got no city money. City support for the 14 churches and their affiliates has increased steadily in the past decade, from $449,699 in 1989 to $1.7 million last year, records show. Some congregations also received interest-free loans or tax credits from the city.

[...]

The 9,200-member Trinity United Church of Christ, at 400 W. 95th St., has garnered the most city funding of the 14 churches—$5.4 million—which includes grants for child care, meal programs and AIDS ministries. The city gave Trinity $218,492 in 1989, and funding has increased every year, to $1.1 million last year.

“If money is available, with no strings attached, we’re willing to cooperate with government agencies to benefit the community,” said the Rev. Melbalenia D. Evans, Trinity’s executive minister. “We do not help the city get votes. That would be a string that would be unacceptable.”

Bowen helped Carter Temple navigate city agencies after the church purchased an abandoned building at 7901 S. State St. in 1998. Williamson convinced 6th Ward Alderman Freddrenna M. Lyle and the city’s Department of Planning and Development that his church had a viable plan to construct senior housing and lure businesses.

The church is seeking federal funding and city tax credits to finance the project, according to Cook County Circuit Court files. A final decision is pending.

“The church today is probably one of the largest developers in the city,” Bowen said. Since January 1999, churches have purchased 23 lots from the city for $1, according to the Department of General Services. The institutions typically use the lots for day care facilities and affordable housing, Bowen said.

Starks calls this “plantation politics,” the practice of throwing out insubstantial gifts to appease—and quiet—the most influential members of minority communities. The city provides funding for church-based programs, he said, in return for political endorsements and muted criticism.

“Nothing’s illegal about it, but you can’t get [funding] unless you’re part of the group,” Starks said.

[...]

Rev. Al Sampson has never sought the help of Bowen or Daley, and his church receives no city money. On a steamy Sunday morning in August, Sampson, a short, stout man wearing a white dashiki, encouraged the 35 worshippers at his Fernwood United Methodist Church, 10057 S. Wallace St., to honor God as the source of their power.

“Give me my daily bread,” Sampson said. “That’s D-A-I-L-Y, not D-A-L-E-Y.” Working up a sweat, he added, “God is the source of our breath. Not Daley, not [Chicago Public Schools Chief Executive Officer Paul G.] Vallas, not [Gov. George] Ryan. God.”

[...]

He has remained a harsh critic of Daley, particularly the administration’s work with black churches. “The tragedy of black churches in this town is that they operate off privileges, not power,” Sampson said. “They have the power to make a change, but they’d rather work for Daley and the politicians to get privileges.”

Through Bowen, Daley has lulled black ministers into complacency, Sampson said. Many have accepted the administration’s argument that they are equipped to provide social services but not to promote long-term business development, he said.

 
 

Comment by MG - PUMA | 2008-10-07 00:06:20

Really funny SNL skit about the housing bailout and George Soros. Soros is described as “the owner of the Democratic Party.” Skit gets good about 1/2 way through. Enjoy!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhBEdgrOXxA

MG- PUMA

Comment by socalannie | 2008-10-07 00:29:14

This was hilarious! Thanks for sharing. I read somewhere else that SNL pulled it from their website. Glad its on youtube.

 

Comment by AnnieCarmel | 2008-10-07 01:51:17

Nice to know we’re not the only ones thinking that Soros has been making mischief with the currency/financial markets to benefit his puppet.

 
 

Comment by wry | 2008-10-07 00:10:34

This is how I explained it to my dear brother. “Jack, I realize I’m a feminist more than a democrat.”

Sarah Palin’s life choices are what our fore mothers fought for. Her choices, and Senator Clinton’s and Dick Cheney’s daughter and her partner. Choice for all women, not just some politically correct ones.

I admire this woman for her bravery and principles.

 

Comment by Hillary or Bust | 2008-10-07 00:11:25

Now that you’ve mentioned Shelly Mandell and NOW here, expect to see some of the self-loathing Palin hatin’ “feminists” come here to comment. They’ve been hitting my site all day, saying the most sexist things. I am ready for them!

Comment by KathyNeocon | 2008-10-07 01:12:49

You Go Girl!!

 

Comment by Northwest rain | 2008-10-07 02:01:18

feminism isn’t owned by liberals or progressives.

Women are women’s worst enemies.

When I got married I kept my surname — and it was ALWAYS the women who gave me a hard time and some told me that it was “illegal” to use my own last name.

The world is upside down — I do believe that the poles have switched and north is south and south is north.

Comment by dpvegas | 2008-10-07 06:40:11

You know, it’s legal to use your legal, given name. To legally use your husband’s name, you have to legally change your name on accounts, documents, etc.

I’ve been so ashamed of the reaction of a lot of people to Gov. Palin. Just skimmed through some of John Dean’s stuff, and he’s got me madder than a wet hen. I’ve enjoyed reading some of his writing about Bush/Cheney, but evidently he’s gotten caught up in the partisanship…except now he’s totally flipped to the Dem side. Guess I should’ve known his judgement wasn’t so great, since he was associated with Nixon.

 
 
 

Comment by Skiron | 2008-10-07 00:15:46

Sarah Palin is going to fight for the middle class? WTF?

Comment by Freedom Fighter | 2008-10-07 00:18:21

When did Sarah Palin make it to middle class? Todd Palin only graduated high school. And her income compared to most politicians is definitely lower class.

Comment by Johnny at Work | 2008-10-07 00:20:34

And yet even little Trig has more class than you!

 

Comment by Paul3triple | 2008-10-07 00:24:21

but i thought you were fighting for the middle class?
She is middle class. Ya know when you picked biden you bragged about his wage compared to others.
She IS the middle class.
But you are the guy who said obama is a god and you think Letterman,Stewart,and Olbermann are political analysts.

It is funny that you show how you really feel about the middle class and small town america.
You really despise us and just look at us as a means to an end.
That will be your fall.
Your polls are always so important, CBS has obama dropping 9 points in a week.

Comment by Freedom Fighter | 2008-10-07 00:27:54

How come every time I cite CBS as a source, you guys tell me it’s not a reputable source?

Comment by AnninCA | 2008-10-07 00:34:17

LOL*…..I don’t really pay too much attention to their poll, but it still is one that shows a definite swing back.

I think there will be movement tomorrow.

 

Comment by Paul3triple | 2008-10-07 00:34:23

I don’t give a flip about the polls. But you do. That is why i cited it.
Fighter of your own freedom

 
 
 

Comment by andySF | 2008-10-07 00:32:12

Didn’t your master said that anyone making more than 250k are filthy rich?

When making around 150k consider low class?

Are you saying that if someone did go to college, they can’t become anything more than low class?

You sounded just like your master, talking with two face and 4 pipe holes.

Comment by andySF | 2008-10-07 00:38:39

Didn’t go to college, typo.

 
 

Comment by Brendy | 2008-10-07 01:39:41

FF: Hey, Elstupo - that’s EVEN BETTER that you think Palin is not middle class; she SHOULD connect with even MORE people. Oh, excuse me - maybe not; those lower than middle class, other than the honest, hard-working poverty-level people who ACTUALLY WORK FOR A LIVING, expect their welfare checks - what, the first of the month? These are your Obummer supporters!

 

Comment by Andy | 2008-10-07 07:46:51

Exactly AnninCA. The question is why was Freddie M & Fannie M. allowed to do so.

 

Comment by Andy | 2008-10-07 07:49:11

FF: you are an elitist punk. That is by definition what middle class is. You obviously belong to the “upper” middle class.

All your comments are such a waste, you are really dense….

 
 

Comment by Seattle Moss | 2008-10-07 00:29:46

Sarah Palin and John McCain are not going to raise my business taxes which have a direct impact on the folks that work for me that are middle class.

Get it!!

Comment by AnninCA | 2008-10-07 00:36:03

A lot of people don’t get that part of Obama’s tax plan.

BTW, did you hear Biden say that he would NOT raise capital gains until it hit 250,000?

I did. And it blew me away. Since when did he change that?

Comment by Paul3triple | 2008-10-07 00:41:34

capital gains have nothing to do with income.
It is a tax on investment capital.
If you want to buy some investments, Obama will hit you for double what it is now.

Obama also says he is not going to raise capitol gains on business.
BUT someone should let him know that business pay income tax, not capital gains tax.
HE is sneaky with his wording.

Comment by AnninCA | 2008-10-07 00:49:02

I know what capital gains tax is. So you’re saying that Biden misspoke about his own tax plan?

*eek*

Sometimes, I think these guys really have no clue.

Comment by Paul3triple | 2008-10-07 00:51:23

i would say misleading not misspoke.

Comment by AnninCA | 2008-10-07 01:00:28

Well, shoot, that’s too bad. I was actually perked up when I heard that.

He’s going to kill, kill small investors and retirees with this capital gains tax.

Comment by beebop | 2008-10-07 05:09:45

If there is anyone out there MAKING money, please send them my way …. paying capital gains is starting to look appealing!

 
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Skiron | 2008-10-07 00:38:09

Oh please. It just means you as a business owner might not be getting that third Lexus. Or maybe you’ll spend two weeks in the Cayman’s instead of three this year. Boo frickin’ hoo.

Comment by andySF | 2008-10-07 00:43:22

And you actually think that wealthy American will be driving Lexus? Not very high information are you?

For you to think that the wealthy in this country will be hurt by this economy more that the poor tell me all I needed to know about your intelligent. You and Obama are of the same stock.

 

Comment by Seattle Moss | 2008-10-07 00:47:38

You’re such a dumb ass!!
Many of us invest in our companies and employees. You have absolutely no concept of what it takes to keep a manufacturing plant in operation. The electricity bills the equipment costs or the price of raw materials.
Since you’re so stupid…
I wouldn’t hire you to sweep the floors!

Comment by Skiron | 2008-10-07 00:53:00

That’s quite alright, I wouldn’t work for a PUMA if I didn’t have two nickels to rub together, because I’d know a company run by that type of brain-dead mentality is bound to fail sooner or later.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-10-07 00:55:30

Everything is bound to fail sooner or later.

 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-10-07 00:56:04

Hmmm…Skiron dating a goat doesn’t make you a very desirable job applicant…lol…High demand for those skills in GAZA so stay there

 
 
 

Comment by Paul3triple | 2008-10-07 00:49:58

so you think a family filing jointly with 3 kids in New york city or any urban area with HIGH cost of living making over 200,000 is in the caymans?
Who is really out of touch?
You guys are about an inch deep.

 

Comment by Seattle Moss | 2008-10-07 00:51:15

The first car these Anti-American obots think of are always foreign..
Well dumb ass..

I buy American!!

 

Comment by Hillary or Bust | 2008-10-07 00:54:50

You’ve obviously never owned a business. I had a small business with a partner and one employee once. Earning $250K in one year will NOT buy you a Lexxus when you need to pay more than one person. We’re not even including expenses in there.

 

Comment by Brendy | 2008-10-07 01:50:11

Oh brother! Skiron must think making $65,000 - $100,000 a year is rich!!! Yeah, I thought s