RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Obama & Friends: History of Radicalism (3 of 3)

This is part 3 of a three-part posting of the six videos that comprise every segment of Hannity’s special last night on Barack Obama’s disturbing associations throughout his adult life. See part one of today’s re-posting of videos 1 and 2: “Obama & Friends: History of Radicalism (1 of 3)” and part two with videos 3 and 4, “Obama & Friends: History of Radicalism (2 of 3).” This posting contains the last two videos, parts 5 and 6 of the Fox News special:

Part 5 of 6

Part 6 of 6

Please share your comments about all six parts here.

::::::::::::

Note: Here are links to the important comments posted by our readers in open threads last night, during and after the show: first thread, second thread, and third thread. (Readers continued to comment throughout the night.)

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post262 Comments »

Comment by Matthew Weaver | 2008-10-06 13:36:41

Now that you’ve hopefully watched all six parts, what is missing? I know we’ve talked about a number of items linking Obama to felons, terrorists, racists, and hate-filled preachers, but even this picture is very incomplete.

Comment by Matthew Weaver | 2008-10-06 13:38:47

For example:

In another press release (one of several) from 2002 (http://chronicle.uchicago.edu/020110/mlk.shtml) s the following:

Obama to speak for MLK Jr. Day
By Carrie Golus
News Office

Barack Obama, State Sen. (Illinois), is this year’s speaker for Martin Luther King Jr. Day at the University.

The annual public service honoring King will be held in Rockefeller Memorial Chapel beginning at noon, Monday, Jan.21.

Obama, Senior Lecturer in the Law School, earned his law degree at Harvard University, where he served as the first African-American president of the Harvard Law Review. During the 1980s, Obama directed community-organizing projects in low-income communities in New York and Chicago.

In 1992, he headed Illinois Project VOTE!, a statewide campaign to increase voter registration and turnout in poor and minority communities.
In 1996, Obama was elected to the Illinois State Senate for the 13th legislative district. He currently serves as Democratic spokesperson for the Public Health and Welfare Committee and co-chairman of the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules. He also serves on the Judiciary and Revenue committees.

Obama’s memoir, Dreams From My Father, was published by Times Books in 1995.

The Coordinating Council for Minority Issues, the Martin Luther King Jr. Day Committee and Rockefeller Memorial Chapel staff members organize the festivities for Martin Luther King Jr. Day at the University. For more information, call (773) 834-4672,

[emphasis added]

Note in this press release the statement that Obama did community organizing in New York! This is the first time I’ve seen this reference. Plus Project Vote! What else is out there that Obama has omitted to share?

Comment by breeze | 2008-10-06 13:41:50

THE RALLY IN FLORIDA

Sarah got quite a few digs in about 0Zero’s
‘friendships’…..

IT WAS A THING OF BEAUTY IN CLEARWATER, FLA.

THIS MORNING!!!

The spectators formed a white, red and blue
humongous flag upon the bleachers!!!

Sarah wasn’t too shabby, either….

WHAT A GLORIOUS MORNING!!!

No, no rock bands, beer and/or hotdogs…..

SARAH IS BIG ENOUGH OF A STAR, HERSELF!

 

Comment by savage | 2008-10-06 14:44:14

you’re emphasis is baffling. Getting people to vote is bad how?

Here’s a fact, McCain voted AGAINST the MLK holiday.

Comment by Matthew Weaver | 2008-10-06 14:46:07

What are you talking about?

Comment by bemused | 2008-10-06 15:18:33

There was a strong sentiment in AZ not to add MLK day, just because it would be another paid holiday and it was felt by some to be an economic strain they couldn’t take (obviously, most survived). There were heated debates over how many holidays we really needed and if we shouldn’t take one off to add MLK. I’d say Mac was yielding to that home pressure, and it really was more about money than anything.

 
 

Comment by Marian | 2008-10-06 15:04:51

Many of us school teachers were against the holiday as we felt that it was honored more while in the school setting and that too many used it as a day to do little or nothing by the majority.
Another day to close the fed buildings but we also gave the same concern when it came to November 11th.
The only day they did not mess with is we are allowed to still call Dec. 25th Christmas it was not moved to a weekend to be celebrated on the following Monday.

 

Comment by AyersAmericasTerrorst | 2008-10-06 15:07:15

Who else was in NY, “organizing” in the 80’s?
Bill Ayers had finished attacking the US with bombs, he then went on to conquer from within.
Ayers and Nobama were in NY, “organizing” with whom?

Comment by athy | 2008-10-06 15:19:14

AyersAmericasTerrorist-
Perhaps this article may provide some insight into what Sen Obama was doing in NY during his college years…

http://www.deepjournal.com/p/7/a/en/1497.html

16 May 2008 |
The men behind Obama: interview with Webster Tarpley

By Daan de Wit

An excerpt:

-I have always wondered, where do these candidates for presidents come from? Is there a grooming process? You actually say Obama has been recruted by Zbigniew Brzezinski as a student on Columbia University?

Webster Tarpley: Yes. This is the interesting about Obama’s biography, that he has these lost years and the lost years where nobody knows anything about what he was doing, we’re not even sure where he was. 1981, 1982, 1983 his last two years in college. He was a Junior and a Senior at Columbia University, actually Columbia College at Columbia University in uptown Manhattan, Morningside Heights. He had started his career at Occidental College near Los Angeles after going to a very expensive private school in Hawaii, the Punahou School. If you go back to 1981, 1982 - you can do this with the help of Samuel Huntington’s Book on American politics, which I quote in my own book, which is called Obama, The Postmodern Coup, the Making of a Manchurian Candidate. If you look in here you will see that they were already sort of summing up their experiences under Carter and they were looking ahead. Huntington is explicitly looking ahead to 2010 and 2030, in other words he believes that there’s gonna be a crisis of ungovernability, what he called the ‘creedal passion period’.

Political upsurge and economic breakdown perhaps. All of this starting around 2010, which is now where we are, we have reached that point.

My guess is that Obama was recruted by Brzezinski at Columbia 1981, 1982, 1983.

You cannot notice this positively, because Obama in his memoires, he has got this thing called Dreams from my Father, he tells you everything about himself, he tells you about marihuana, cocaine, almost heroine, but not quite, tells you all this stuff, but when it comes to Columbia University he tells you nothing.

It’s exactly puzzling, because why would he tell you about marihuana and cocaine, which are bad and than not tell you about his career, with this wonderful Ivy League prestigious elite Columbia University, he doesn’t say anything about it.

The same thing is what The New York Times found. The New York Times, trying to do the life of Obama, they focused on his years in New York City, because they’re from New York and they couldn’t find anything.

They couldn’t find out what courses he took, who his friends were, anything that he did, he doesn’t seem to be in the yearbook, it’s all very strange. Chicago Tribune which is very, very favourable to Obama did the same thing, could not find anything about those years at Columbia.

Now they’re two possibilities. One is that he’s hiding homosexual activity. Obama, I think, is pretty well established to be a bi-sexual, he’s accused by Larry Sinclair of homosexual encounters with crack-cocaine. We can talk about that in a minute.

But I think the deeper level is what he’s covering up in terms of his contacts with Brzezinski.

Obama was a politic’s major with his speciality in international relations and a thesis topic that was Soviet nuclear disarmament.

Now that has Brzezinski written all over it. In those years Brzezinski was on the campus at Columbia, he was the head of the Institute of Communist Affairs, an anti Soviet thinktank.

It seems to me extremely likely that he was recruted by Brzezinski at that point. Meaning that he has been indoctrinated for 25 years. If this is not true, I would invite Obama to tell us the full story of his years at Columbia and he has said zero.

No friends, no professors, no transcript, no nothing. It is the biggest obsessive secrecy that we’ve seen. It’s comparible to, you know Bush has tried to hide his drunk driving record. In this case Obama won’t let you know what he did at Columbia. He should be saying, ‘Oh I’m proud, I was an A-student, I wrote this wonderful thing’, the highlight of his early career was to go to Columbia.

So, he doesn’t do that. What this means then is: 25 years of indoctrination and grooming. With Carter they only had 5 or 6 years at most. They’re from 1970, 1971, 1972 until 1976 when he won the presidency. In the case of Obama I think you’re looking at a 25 year process where they were guiding his career.

Comment by AyersAmericasTerrorst | 2008-10-06 18:05:39

Very Imformative, thank you.
Although, I disagree with the author about the 25 year grooming period.
Frank M. Davis was grooming him in Hawaii. There are articles that Ann Dunham kept in touch with obama sr. who was busy trying to force marx/leninist theory into Kenyan politics, which opposed his mentor, Tom Myoboy(sp). Moreover, there is evidence that the Madelyn and Stanley Dunham were active in the Washington State Comm. Party and then again in Hawaii.
Obama has been groomed for a lifetime. Which is why he shows no values of his own, other than Black Supremacy/Nationalism, wrapped in the garb of marxism/leninism/ and nation of islamism. (Nation of Islam and Farakhan are more Black supremacists rather than orthodox muslims. Salafi muslims call N.O.I and Farakhan kufr, or infidels and have asked that a fatwa be issued against them.

FARRAKHANISM

More deserving to be called the Nation of Kufr, this cult has used black nationalism as its momentum in finding recruits. with elements of Muslim and Christian beliefs

The most prominent of the pseudo-Islamic groups in America was “The Lost Found Nation of Islam” which became known in the news media as the “Black Muslims”. This group’s beginnings are somewhat shrouded in mystery. A foreigner, by the name of Wallace Fard Muhammad, of uncertain origin, taught what he termed Islaam among Blacks in Detroit from 1929 to 1931. Following his disappearance in 1931, the most prominent of his students, Elijah Poole (1897-1975) secured leadership of the group and claimed that Fard was actually God in person and that he, Elijah, was the messenger of God sent to Black Americans. Elijah taught that Black people were gods, and White people were devils created by a Black scientist. Heaven and Hell, according to his teachings, are on earth in this life and there is no resurrection for the physically dead. [Black Muslims, pp. 72-78] Although Elijah claimed that the Qur’aan was the book of Muslims, he mostly referred to the Bible in his teachings. Actually, the main text of the cult was a book composed of some of his speeches and newspaper articles which he called Message to the Black Man in America. [Elijah Muhammad, Message to the Black Man in America, (Chicago, ILL: Muhammad’s Temple no. 2, 1965)]

http://www.allaahuakbar.net/nation/farrakhanism.htm

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Five Thirty | 2008-10-06 13:44:57

I’d like to know more about Sen. Obama’s involvement in the politics of Kenya.

Comment by Galt, Master Thrall of Planet Triskelion, Proprietor of the NQ Popcorn Concession | 2008-10-06 13:48:47

Ask the media digging through dumpsters in Alaska if they might spend at least some of their time in Kenya.

Comment by Matthew Weaver | 2008-10-06 13:52:37

Forget Kenya, focus simply on Chicago. Look at Obama’s circle—Wright, Meeks, Pfleger, Jones, Rezko, Jones, and more. Who do all these share but missing from Obama’s connections?

Farrakhan.

I’m sorry, I don’t think this is true. Obama spent too much time becoming part of the Chicago scene to have not associated with Farrakhan. Where is this info?

Comment by AyersAmericasTerrorst | 2008-10-06 15:11:58

Doesn’t farakhan live in nobama’s neighborhood?
Right down the street from Ayers and NObama?

His office is: The Nation of Islam National Center 7351 South Stony Island Ave. Chicago, IL. 60649.

 

Comment by mimi | 2008-10-06 23:35:02

Actually, Matthew, that is the most glaring clue. The absence of any connection to Farrakhan. In my mind, it proves that 0bama has been groomed for a very long time.

Think about it. Didn’t Jackson’s connection to Farrakhan go a long towards destroying his reputation so that when he made his run for the WH and registered 7 million people he could not live down his Hymie Town remarks nor his association with Farrakhan whom he refused to repudiate.

It’s like the murderer who wipes his fingerprints from the scene of the crime.

This is deliberate. Why associate with everyone else in this group yet not Farrakhan?

Because it would have been the one thing that would have bought his presidential hopes down before they started.

 
 
 

Comment by Maverick | 2008-10-06 14:42:00

Fraudbama is on the phone daily with Odingy Odinga as witnessed by campaign workers and has been in close contact since the beginning of the Primary election.

 

Comment by athy | 2008-10-06 15:25:59

Five Thirty-
I’d like to know what Sen Obama thinks about REPARATIONS FOR SLAVERY.

Although the topic of race was brought up constantly in this campaign by Sen Obama & his handlers, the topic of reparations for slavery was never discussed.

What is Sen Obama’s position on this issue?

http://archives.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/africa/09/01/durban.slavery/index.html

Interesting article (see below) which may allow us to infer what Sen Obama’s position on reparations issue MIGHT BE:

http://www.newsweek.com/id/128633/page/1

“When Barry Became Barack” by Richard Wolffe, Jessica Ramirez and Jeffrey Bartholet
NEWSWEEK 3/31/08 Issue

I found this story very interesting however I was quiet surprised when I reached the last page.
The author recounted a story that was passed on to Sen Obama by white family members concerning an incident at a waikiki bar involving Sen Obama’s bio-dad Barry Sr.

“Barry’s white grandfather and several other Hawaiian friends take Barry Sr. to a Waikiki bar. It’s a joyous scene, everyone eating and drinking “to the sounds of a slack-key guitar,” when a white man with a booming voice announces to the bartender that he shouldn’t have to drink “next to a nigger.” The stunned clientele expects a fight. But Barry Sr. smiles and quietly lectures the man “about the folly of bigotry, the promise of the American dream, and the universal rights of man.” In response, the shamed white man gives Barry Sr. $100, in apparent payment for his sin of racism. Even the young Obama found the tale hard to believe. But many years later, he recalls in “Dreams From My Father,” he got a phone call from a Japanese-American man who had been a classmate of Barry Sr.’s in Hawaii. Unprompted, the man told Obama the same story. Obama says he was struck by the man’s tone of “disbelief—and hope.”

I have wondered for a while now why , although Sen Obama talks about certain race issues he omits discussion on a VERY IMPORTANT RACE ISSUE: Reparations for slavery. You can imagine my surprise when I got to the last page of the Newsweek article. I am prompted to re-ask my question.

Reparations for slavery both in the U.S and in Africa- Last year Sen Obama supported the very controversial 3rd ward Ald. Dorothy Tillman in her runoff against an independent candidate. Tillman is one of the most important and outspoken U.S advocates of reparations for slavery.

http://www.suntimes.com/news/miller/309639,CST-EDT-MILL23.article

SunTimes Commentary- “Will 3rd Ward politics affect Obama’s presidential race? “ by Rich Miller 3/23/07

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorothy_Tillman

What about Sen Obama’s position regarding reparations for slavery from western and ex-colonial European powers for Africa and African nations? During the 2001 UN-sponsored World Conference against Racism, many African nations demanded an apology-plus other things- from ex-colonial European nations for the role they (European nations) had in promoting the slave trade.

Why doesn’t Sen Obama ever discuss this very important ‘race’ issue.

Also, I had read somewhere that John Conyers was working on a bill in Congress to facilitate this ‘reparation process’.

Has anyone heard anything similiar? If so, please pass on links to your source.Thanks…

 

Comment by A Woman for Palin | 2008-10-06 17:27:50

Five Thirty,

I want to know that also. We need to know whether Obama has undivided loyalty to the United States. Remeber, he even can not show a U.S. birth certificate.

New York Times is more interested in Palin daughter’s pregnance than Obama’s political activities in a foreign country!!! NY Times and the media alike are absolutely shameless.

 

Comment by mary | 2008-10-06 18:25:13

530

Obama spent $50,000 to campaign in 2006 in Kenya (with Dick Morris) to help his Luo cousin Raila Odinga, the Marxist Islamist who promised to instal SHARIA LAW for all girls and women in Kenya. Last December cousin Odinga’s gangs, having lost the election, rioted, burning 50 churches and burning alive dozens of families and raped hudnreds of village children and women. 200,000 internally displaced Kenyans were the result of Odinga’s murderous riots.
Condi Rice allowed Obama to write a (what else?) a SPEECH TO STOP CARNAGE IN KENYA. Obama of course obliged.
Odinga had been supported by all extremist Islamist Sharia law-supporting muslims.
Kenya was a 90% Christian country. Odinga’s gangs were the minority.

the Presidnet of Keny complained officially re Obama’s “Interference in Kenya’s sovereign affairs…Obama is just an immature, INEXPERIENCED SENATOR”…The European press and BBC carried articles on Obama’s UNPRECEDENTED INTERFERENCE IN A FOREIGN COUNTRY’S AFFAIRS!
He should have resigned as Senator!

 
 
 

Comment by Freedom Fighter | 2008-10-06 13:40:31

Looks like all the talk about Senator Obama’s associations has gotten the Sarah Palin smear merchants working over time.

http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ayers-dohrn-obama-tie-shouldnt-be-dismissed/

Too bad, the American people won’t buy it.

Comment by breeze | 2008-10-06 13:43:49

You want to bet, ff?

They sure loved it in Clearwater this morning!!!

Comment by dems4barr | 2008-10-06 14:35:42

are you seriously gonna claim a campaign rally reflects the feelings of the entire American public. come on, you know better than that. at least the polls are looking up, right? he’s only down a measly 8 points

Comment by Jules | 2008-10-06 17:18:28

Yes, we’re aware that the polls are currently showing that 8% more of the American people are fine with voting for a guy who pals around and does business with terrorists in a post 9/11 world. Don’t you ever wonder why the terrorist groups want him elected? The Russians? The Iranians? Why the terrorism experts say electing a Democrat in 2008 would be disastrous and that terrorists consider Obama their ‘friend’.

I wouldn’t be celebrating yet if I were you. Just remember that if Obama gets elected and the unthinkable happens, it will rest in part on your shoulders because you fell for his lies. The information is there for you…you’re just choosing not to look at it.

 
 
 

Comment by Matthew Weaver | 2008-10-06 13:46:27

It is not a smear if it is true. Anyway, had Obama been vetted before being coronated by the party as nominee, we wouldn’t be here talking about this today. Obama’s past is remarkably unknown to this day–he hasn’t released his medical records, his school records, hasn’t been honest about is work and activities in the 80s-through today, hasn’t explained any details about his 3-week visit to Pakistan in the early 80s, and more. There is a lot more to learn about Obama and since he has preferred to lie, mistate, and omit about his past, it’ll all come out drop-by-painful-drop.

Comment by Freedom Fighter | 2008-10-06 13:55:22

Did you read the article I linked to? They are now trying to connect Bernadine Dorhn to Charles Manson. McCain is really losing it.

Comment by Matthew Weaver | 2008-10-06 14:01:45

I skimmed it but I don’t follow with your “McCain is really losing it.” That seems to not be the case at all. In fact, I’ve heard more than once today about how the Obama campaign is “coming unglued”. Anyway, once the dust is settled, I suspect Obama will be down significantly. He has only words that have turned out to be lies more often than not. McCain, by comparison, has actions. Big difference.

Comment by Freedom Fighter | 2008-10-06 14:06:52

So you think trying to connect Bernadine Dorhn to Charles Manson is no big deal? Who next? Osama bin Laden?

Comment by Matthew Weaver | 2008-10-06 14:09:12

Well, how about explaining Obama’s late admited 3 weeks in Pakistan in the early 1980s? Maybe not Osama directly but indirectly is highly likely. Plus there are others through who one might suggest, however tenuously, that there is a connection through shared associates.

 

Comment by Ferd McBerfle | 2008-10-06 14:10:52

After all the crap your Anointed One has dished out, I think you protest way too much, little fussbudget.

 

Comment by Geoff | 2008-10-06 14:28:48

Dohrn did strongly support Manson publically back then, FF. Try reading a book.

Comment by AnnieCarmel | 2008-10-06 14:57:27

She stated she admired Manson. No one is saying she was there stabbing Sharon Tate although she thought it was cool.

 
 
 

Comment by Diana L. C. | 2008-10-06 14:34:50

I’m urging a little patience here. These trolls are people who have to do this, but I am thinking they are a little frightened that they, too, have been bamboozled. It’s a little sad trying to cling to one’s unfounded notions about the glory of the One.

What I’m noticing here where I work is NO ONE talking about Hannity’s show last night. There may be several reasons:

1: Few saw it, and the ones who did are afraid to bring up the inforamtion at work, where we’re all supposed to keep our politics to ourselves.

2. Again, few saw it, but the few who did will be emailing or talking with friends and family who are sympathetic with them and telling them what they saw and heard. It will take a while for all the information Hannity gave out to sink in with the general public.

3. Many know nothing about the show. They may know only a little, if anything, about the NYT whitewash. They are just smugly going along thinking everything is as it was with the campaigns a week ago.

4. Many are just waiting for the debate tomorrow to see if anything comes of this whole thing.

We’re (including trolls, are here blogging because it’s big to us at this point. It will take time to sink in.

Comment by Touchet | 2008-10-06 15:22:51

People saw it but believe me, they won’t risk talking about it at work.

 

Comment by Thinker | 2008-10-06 18:58:25

These trolls are people who have to do this, but I am thinking they are a little frightened that they, too, have been bamboozled.

- I think so too Diana. They have to know by now that there has been a whole lot of bamboozling going on, but Obama is the one doing it.

 
 
 

Comment by Dr. Kate | 2008-10-06 14:08:28

hello? Dohrn saw Manson as a perfect symbol for her revolution. She is connected to him, DORK! I would suggest it is you that is coming unglued as all the dots are connected.

why do you think barky is now claiming he knew nothing about ayers and dohrn? Just because of this stuff.

with friends like barky’s why does america need any more enemies? Ayers and dohrn hate america. they have dedicated their lives to bringing us down. that’s why they like barky. he is nothing but a tool.

Comment by Freedom Fighter | 2008-10-06 14:30:45

According to wikipedia:

Dohrn was criticized for a comment she made about the Charles Manson led Tate-LaBianca murders in a speech during the December 1969 “War Council” meeting organized by the Weathermen and attended by about 400 people in Flint, Michigan: “Dig it! First they killed those pigs and then they put a fork in their bellies. Wild!” Dohrn also charged that her fellow left-wingers showed themselves to be scared “honkies” for not burning down Chicago when Black Panther leader Fred Hampton was killed, and urged her audience to arm themselves and be “a fighting force alongside the blacks.” Dohrn’s husband, Bill Ayers has written that Dohrn was being ironic when she made the statement.

The sleazy wingnuts took her words out of context. Dohrn was not being serious, she was just being ironic.

Comment by Ferd McBerfle | 2008-10-06 14:37:09

The sleazy wingnuts took her words out of context. Dohrn was not being serious, she was just being ironic.

Irony my ass. And Wikipedia is no place to get informqation free-dumb. Try again, only this time use a reliable source.

 

Comment by Ferd McBerfle | 2008-10-06 14:39:17

Dohrn’s husband, Bill Ayers has written that Dohrn was being ironic when she made the statement.

Wow, there’s an objective point of view, huh, free-dumb? You are so stupid.

Try again.

 

Comment by Jules | 2008-10-06 17:30:24

Dohrn was not being serious, she was just being ironic.

Oh well hell then, go have tea with her. Leave your children with her and her husband. She sounds like a lovely lady. So she made the FBI 10 Most Wanted List. What a hoot!!

You are truly a kook.

 
 
 

Comment by destardi | 2008-10-06 14:16:19

Duuude.

How the f*ck do you go from an article on a right-wing blog, which points (factually mind you) of an essay written by Dorhn about the Tate murders, to “mccain is losing it, and now they’re trying to connect them with manson”.

1)Are you saying Dohrn didn’t write the essay?

2)Where does ANYthing at pajamas directly say Dorhn is connected to the Tate murders?

3)Where is John McCain’s hand in all of this?

You’re smoking crack.

 

Comment by Diana L. C. | 2008-10-06 14:23:56

We don’t need to “try” on this one since many of us are old enough to remember these things.

Comment by Pennsylvania goes RED! | 2008-10-06 16:04:34

Yes.

I was a little young, however I recall the zeitgeist of the late 1960s.

These children just don’t have a clue.

 
 

Comment by Jules | 2008-10-06 17:24:34

They are now trying to connect Bernadine Dorhn to Charles Manson.

Maybe because here is a quote from Dorhn about some of the Manson murders:

“Dig it! First they killed those pigs and then they put a fork in their bellies. Wild!”

So would you do business with this lady’s husband, who is just as bad? Oh, what the hell, right? We know you don’t care, you freak.

 
 
 

Comment by jwrjr | 2008-10-06 13:48:15

Judging from the troll infestation, the smear merchants attacking Sarah Palin are working overtime. And the American people aren’t buying it.

Comment by savage | 2008-10-06 14:46:41

dissent troll. Internets 101.

 
 

Comment by Ferd McBerfle | 2008-10-06 13:57:09

What the American public won’t buy are your overwrought talking points, Free-dumb.

Besides, we can see you lily-white battle flag with yellow strip coming. Fighter, my ass. You’re a keyboard warrior living in your Mommy’s basement, just like Kelvin, Robert, ee, Little Debbie, and the rest of you useless trolls.

Go post somewhere where your single-digit IQs will fit right in.

Comment by Galt, Master Thrall of Planet Triskelion, Proprietor of the NQ Popcorn Concession | 2008-10-06 14:00:34

The trolls are going to need colostomy bags when you are through with them Ferd.

Comment by Ferd McBerfle | 2008-10-06 14:05:54

LMAO. That or a course in Logic 101. I am sick of the idiots and I’m after them. They are vermin.

Comment by Galt, Master Thrall of Planet Triskelion, Proprietor of the NQ Popcorn Concession | 2008-10-06 14:13:35

Baracktoberfest is off to a great start judging by the troll infestation pandemic.

Comment by Ferd McBerfle | 2008-10-06 14:30:03

They’re like rats on a sinking ship except they won’t blame the Captain–it’s the deck chair’s fault.

 

Comment by csuzeq | 2008-10-06 14:39:35

And listening to McCain on CNN right now! CNN!. He is going full speed after Barky and the corwd is going wild!

Happy October!

Comment by Galt, Master Thrall of Planet Triskelion, Proprietor of the NQ Popcorn Concession | 2008-10-06 14:51:33

Its about time Mac go after Opampers. Republicans, PUMA and indy’s will be cheering him on to victory and quietly in the background Bill and Hillary will be laughing their asses off.

 
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by lark | 2008-10-06 14:01:23

Too bad, the American people won’t buy it.

Get ready to feel the pain for no freedom and for not fighting. I bet you will suffer worse than all of us here in this forum. That’s the way with life.

Comment by 30yrdem-not any more | 2008-10-06 14:04:34

Amen to that lark.

Comment by Seattle Moss | 2008-10-06 14:09:04

Spot on lark!

Personally most of us are mature and established in life. My main concern is protecting my workers and their families.

One thing is clear…
Marxist wishing Obamabots have never experienced the horror of living in a totalitarian society.

They should be careful what they wish for!

 
 

Comment by savage | 2008-10-06 14:48:11

you sucked on the Stranger’s blog brawl. just FYI.

 
 

Comment by Medusa | 2008-10-06 15:17:27

Keep in mind this comment made by “Freedom Fighter.” He’s not worth responding to.

Comment by Freedom Fighter | 2008-09-25 22:28:03

Senator Obama is a gift from God, there is no need to look at his resume.

 
 

Comment by 30yrdem-not any more | 2008-10-06 13:43:01

Hannity did a good job but the Obama camp is now saying Obama didn’t know Ayers was a terrorist.I am not f’n kidding you…they say he didn’t know. After they say they are friends, some are saying Obama does not even know Ayers…one big lie coming from Obama.

He goes after McCain on the 5 and has 1 of them working for him..Gleen…
Keating Five Member is Obama Surrogate

And you have this guy telling people to sell.

Jim Cramer: Time to get out of the stock market

I used to like Cramer…I wonder why he did this??? He is a dem.

Comment by Freedom Fighter | 2008-10-06 13:48:27

Why would Barack Obama know they are social activists? Do William Ayers and Bernadine Dorhn advertise that fact openly?

Comment by ohio | 2008-10-06 13:53:23

Obama knew because he too is and was a socialist. Unless Obama isn’t as “intelligent” as he would like for you to believe. Maybe someone should have asked him what kind of newspapers he read. Would have been a fair question. I mean, I’m a year older than he is and I knew about Ayers and Dorhn, and I’m from the midwest, so you are saying that Obama didn’t know? yea, right!!! There goes that “intelligent theory”.

 

Comment by Ferd McBerfle | 2008-10-06 13:53:25

Is your Anointed One a dufus or what? If he didn’t know, then he is by all means unqualified to be President. It is his business to know. Nice try, Goob, but you *really* need to own your candidate and stop making excuses for him.

 

Comment by 30yrdem-not any more | 2008-10-06 13:54:07

Yes they did in interviews in the late 90’s. Connie Chung interviewed them and they said they both wished they had done more. And also who doesn’t know who Ayers is? Everyone in America knows who he is and what he did in America. If he didn’t know he is pretty damn dumb.

 

Comment by Gal from Tex | 2008-10-06 14:03:30

Ya know FF it boggles the mind how anyone can call a friend someone of Bill Ayers’ and Bernadine Dohrn’s character. The man who is an unrepentant homeland terrorist. The woman who ADMIRES Charles Manson.

And if these facts do not bother you..what does this say about YOUR character? You must be either very young or very stupid or of the same sociopath tendency. Get help!

 

Comment by trails | 2008-10-06 14:23:37

Most intelligent people have heard of Ayers and Dorhn. What does that make Obama? Really, I think his response that he didn’t know their past would, on its face, make Obama too ill informed to be POTUS.

Comment by Maverick | 2008-10-06 14:48:29

Reply to up post troll>It makes Fraudbama a dangerous communist.

We need to “defeat” the entire
Democrat Party and start over with new blood.
Did you get this on Fraudbama’s pediphile childhood mentor Matt?It turns out that Obama’s childhood mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, was a communist…
http://www.aim.org/aim-column/obamas-communist-mentor/

 
 

Comment by Diana L. C. | 2008-10-06 14:46:57

Read some earlier threads with links to articles from Chicago all the while O and Ayers were on boards together. There was plenty of information about Ayers in the Chicago paper, assuming O really cares to read anything but teleprompers.

And what about Ayers statements on the actual day of the 9/11 tragedy in New York?

Give us a break–For someone who is young and impressionable, I would ask that question. Obama is supposed to be aware enough to be the leader of the Free World.

I’ve always been a little nervous about these Gen X and Gen y, and Millenial people. I taught some of them–not history, mind you, not my subject. They cheated their way through classes, copying answers, not doing their reading. They would ask really surprising questions that absolutely showed their cluelessness: “Ummm, did Vietnam come before or after World War I?”

Obama knows the stupidity of his minions in regard to history. That is why he feels he can get away with this and why he is working so hard to get the mentally ill and drunkard from homeless shelters and all the young people to vote. He wants to counter the numbers of older people voting because he knows they know something. It’s why during the primaries the O people were quite cruel to the older Hillary delegates. (Don’t say it didn’t happen!)

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-10-06 16:18:27

Read some earlier threads with links to articles from Chicago all the while O and Ayers were on boards together.

This is what’s so striking about Obama’s comment today about not knowing Ayers. Does he mean not knowing his past about the bombings? Surely that would have come up in conversions between two because Ayers is proud of his terrorist past.

If he is saying that he doesn’t know Ayers that well, then how do you get to be chairman of the board, without any experience, if you Ayers did not KNOW YOU.

This response is bordering on crack cocaine user’s logic.

 
 

Comment by McKatmoon | 2008-10-06 15:15:20

You need to answer those questions, you are supporting him, we already know the answers. Stop deflecting.

 

Comment by bemused | 2008-10-06 15:23:49

Only when their mouths are open.

 

Comment by NoBamaNoWay | 2008-10-06 16:48:44

OMG. it was only all over the news everywhere, certainly in chicago. there’s no way obama could have associated with them for more than a week without knowing.

 
 

Comment by athy | 2008-10-06 16:59:38

30 Yr dem not any more
we need to send the Obama campaign this video.
Maybe it will help to jog Sen Obama’s memory?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79fC0jAi2gc

As one can plainly infer from the facts presented in this video- there is NO WAY that Sen Obama could not have known about Ayers.Most damning is the Connie Chung interview towards the end of the video.

Sen Obama was not 8 years old when that interview took place. He should have known about Ayers.
I will take the liberty of paraphrasing an astute NQ blogger who posted on an earlier thread:

If Obama didn’t KNOW what Wright was preaching, and Obama didn’t know who Bill Ayers was, and he had no idea of Rezko’s business dealings, and he didn’t know about Meeks or Phleger or Khalidi or any of these other people, we are NOW supposed to give him the keys to the white house and access to the nuclear bomb codes?

So, when we find out he was lunching with bin Laden, or Ali Atwa or Ayman Al-Zawahiri we are supposed to believe that he didn’t know who they were?

So, again - is he a liar or an idiot?

 
 

Comment by Steven | 2008-10-06 13:49:48

Judge-One transcript of you and Ayers.
Obama-“That’s not mine.
Judge: One credit card receipt for money signed by Ayers.
Obama-I’m telling ya baby, that’s not mine.
Judge: One warranty card for House down the block to Ayers.
Obama-I don’t even know what this is! This sort of thing ain’t my bag, baby.
Judge-One book, “Terrorists and Me: This Sort of Thing Is My Bag Baby”, by written by Obama

 

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-10-06 13:50:38

FYI

For those SARAH fans she’s got a live rally goin in in FLA right now! Connie Mack is just now speaking.

Here is the link to cnn live blog

She’ll be on soon. FINALLY CNN is covering her rally! I’ve looked for days and they rarely cover them. The JERKS!

Sorry to interrupt! Thought some who are current would like to know.

GO Sarah!
GO John!

PUMA W00T!! :-)

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-10-06 13:53:34

also once you get to the link provided

just click on the tab at the top that says

LIVE VIDEO

and once it loads pick which live feed you want

there is always one of Bambi but rarely of Sarah!

YIPPEE!!

 

Comment by breeze | 2008-10-06 13:56:01

IT WAS A THING OF BEAUTY IN CLEARWATER, FLA.

THIS MORNING!!!

The spectators formed a white, red and blue
humongous flag upon the bleachers!!!

Sarah wasn’t too shabby, either….

WHAT A GLORIOUS MORNING!!!

No, no rock bands, beer and/or hotdogs…..

SARAH IS BIG ENOUGH OF A STAR, HERSELF!

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-10-06 14:05:13

awesome! She’s in Estero right now. SW FLA she must be working her way South?


that’s the link

 
 

Comment by Urban Hillbilly | 2008-10-06 14:18:58

Must see TV!

Is Palin competing with Bill Clinton in Florida today?

 

Comment by Urban Hillbilly | 2008-10-06 14:23:19

HOT STUFF!!!

SHE IS COMING ON NOW!

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-10-06 14:25:26

they turned it OFF!!!!!!

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-10-06 14:27:17

ok it’s back on

the BAS
tards!

Comment by savage | 2008-10-06 14:50:23

tards!

show some respect. how old are you?

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-10-06 15:00:12

respect to who? CNN? no

and it was BASTARDS
but I split it up

so what?